Mr. Beaks Checks The Vital Signs Of WORLD WAR Z!
There is no blood in WORLD WAR Z.
This was my main takeaway from the footage Paramount screened of its $170 million summer tentpole last Friday. I’ve been watching zombie films most of my life, and I can’t remember the living dead ever going about their flesh-gnashing business in such a tidy manner. From the opening Philadelphia onslaught (where Brad Pitt and his family find themselves stuck in traffic, fleeing a CG horde of panicked humans and rabid once-were-humans) to the frantic Jerusalem siege (on display in the above-embedded trailer), I kept waiting for the carnage to match the gritty, hand-held aesthetic adopted by director Marc Forster. Curiously, even for a PG-13 movie, not a drip of the red stuff. If there is blood, they're definitely holding it back.
Given the highlight-reel nature of the footage (which played like a preview of scenes from next week’s WORLD WAR Z), I couldn’t get a genuine feel for whether the film works as a drama. If I’m to trust what we were shown, Forster is going to be shuttling UN employee Pitt all over the world in a two-day scramble for patient zero. Find the source of the disease that's rapidly turning people into zombies, and, at the very least, humanity will have a vaccine that will stop the spread of the virus. Seems like an awful lot to accomplish in two days, but it's the movies!
While the characterization and plotting seemed perilously thin, I’ll give the movie the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to a wrongheaded presentation, but I still can’t get over the sterile quality of the action. During the Jerusalem siege (which played like a run-through for a truly harrowing set piece), a young Israeli soldier gets bitten by a zombie. You see a brief close up of the allegedly mangled arm before Brad Pitt chops it off (the film’s rules state that humans have a twelve-second window from exposure to zombification). There’s no blood, no discernable abrasion, maybe raised skin, but you’re so confused by that point - why isn't there blood everywhere - that the shot has lost all intended value. Once the arm is severed, the stump is dressed, and you see a red stain underneath cloth. That’s it. At this point, you’re acutely aware that you’re watching a sanitized-for-the-ratings-board movie. Again, that’s fine as long as you’re invested in the characters and the drama, but, sadly, I’ve yet to see any indication that, beyond my natural inclination to root for Brad Pitt (who gamely introduced last week’s presentation), I’m going to care about any of this.
Marc Forster sat for a twenty-minute Q&A following the presentation, and he promised the assembled journalists that the film does have a lower gear. “It does take a break and become more reflective. It’s not what you guys saw here.” Forster answered all questions about the lengthy production process (production began in July of 2011, and there have been significant rewrites/reshoots), and why he departed from the “oral history” structure of Max Brooks’s novel. (FYI, this was a group Q&A. I only asked two of the below questions.)
Where are you in the editing process right now?
We are about two weeks away from locking picture.
What kind of rules are there for the zombies?
The rules all say head shots kill them. There’s a line in the movie also, which is not in [the footage], but sort of, “Spines are divine, but knees are just fine.” Basically, if you hit them in the knees, they start crawling or in the spine and so on. But it’s the same rules. Head shots kill them.
There’s a lot written about changes made to the third act and doing some reshooting of scenes.
We shot the movie and put it together and we all felt the ending wasn’t what we wanted it to be and could be better. We showed it to the studio and [we], as the filmmakers agreed. [We] made a proposal, they agreed and we went back and did some additional shooting. We are really happy now with the result.
Is it a big difference from the original?
I think towards the ending it’s a big difference, a different ending, yes. I prefer it. I think it’s more powerful and really works in the favor of the story.
In so many zombie movies, and especially stuff like The Walking Dead, we see these hero shots of the zombies in zombie makeup, and sometimes they have personalities that are lent to them. But in this, it seems like they are more like a force of nature. You don’t give too many identities to these people, and the people who are turning into zombies. Do you have those moments or is it more, like I said, a force of nature?
No, we do have those moments, but you didn’t see them in this version. We do have these moments of identity with zombies, one-on-one as well, later in the film. But at the same time, the idea was that the zombies came out of nature, sort of this flocking, swarming or sort of [like] George Romero films of the ‘70s, where the zombies were such a great metaphor for consumerism. For me, the metaphor was more about overpopulation today and less and less resources, and this swarming of them is almost like them going after the last resources, especially when the feeding frenzy starts.
Are they given some sort of superpowers? They seem to jump further, they run faster...
No, no, they don’t have any superpowers.
I meant more so than a regular human, the way they are able to jump and fall.
No, they just don’t know the difference of height and stuff. They just go because they don’t know the building is ending. They just keep moving, wherever they move, they just keep on moving. They just don’t know any boundaries.
So maybe not super, but more enhanced, like speed? I mean, those guys were running pretty fast and bouncing off things...
Yeah, when the feeding frenzy starts, they just run, but not faster than any human being.
Can you talk about Brad Pitt’s character and why he has the expertise that they need here?
Brad Pitt’s character was a U.N. employee and his expertise comes from working in a lot of global places which were in crises - Africa, Bosnia, and so forth. I think you guys saw where the captain gives him his resume, and he was able to basically always come out alive of these places with crises and was able to either identify the problem or the issues at these places. So at this point of the story, it is up to him to go on the quest to find patient zero, or find the root of the problem, and they feel like he is the right person to assist one of those scientists to find the root of it all.
Could you talk a little about the 3D conversion process?
You saw it in the trailer. For me, it was important to be able to work in that process - and we did a lot of tests - and still be able to work in the handheld motion. Ultimately, when you have faster cuts and the character is more handheld, then sometimes… you can go less in-depth, because your eye doesn’t have to adjust. But I think it’s a fun process, and it’s something I would definitely want to explore more and try in the future.
I’m curious what the time frame is in the movie. Is it something that takes place in a few days or over a month or two?
It’s basically a couple of days. It’s pretty compressed.
One of the most common scenes that we see in the zombie genre is when somebody hides their bite, and they have that huge moment when you have to decide if you’re going to shoot your loved one. In this film, it looks like it takes about 8 seconds for that conversion to be made. What was the motivation behind that?
It’s twelve seconds. When you see the entire film, there are some people who turn faster than others, but it’s sort of this idea of how a virus also mutates. We all sort of based it in biology, in a sense that some viruses start to mutate very fast and sometimes it takes a bit longer - like when you saw the countdown in Philadelphia, it takes twelve seconds, and then he comes to another place where someone reports that it takes longer, So he’s trying to figure it out. That’s one of his quests.
How much did Max Brooks have to do with the movie?
I met Max a couple times when we just spoke about the book and his intentions and I think, ultimately, he just gave his blessings. He hasn’t seen the finished film yet, because I want to show it all finished. He has seen some of the material, but I am looking forward to showing it to him. I hope I get his blessings.
Did you get UN or CDC advisors to work with you on the accuracy of the film?
Yes, yes, we did have some advisors.
In all of the clips I’ve seen of this, including this, Brad Pitt has not been doing any of the killing. Does he get involved in the killing at some point?
Yes. Yes. [Laughter]
And how many zombie actors did you use?
It depends. Sometimes up to a hundred zombie actors, and in some of the crowd scenes, like fifty with excellent makeup up in front and fifty with sort of a B-group, where they’re sort of background. But usually 100 people, because it takes a long time in makeup. Sometimes people have to be there at 3 AM for us to be ready to shoot at 8 or 9.
The woman that plays the wife of Brad Pitt, will she have a bigger role, than kind of the helpless wife?
Yes. She is stuck on the ship when he leaves, but we’re always coming back to her. I wouldn’t call her the helpless wife. I don’t think that’s the definition.
I saw her kick the zombie in the face in the beginning, so I figured...
No, she gets more active as well.
QUANTUM OF SOLACE was a pretty big movie, and this one looks way, way bigger. What kinds of challenges does that present?
It’s a very different thing. In QUANTUM, you’re dealing with a genre, it was a film that has existed over many years. Here you’re dealing with a genre which has been done many times, but you’re trying to find a way in that’s still new and fresh and different, that you don’t repeat what other people have done and have a new perspective to it. I think in this one, what was really great about this film is it’s a global epidemic. You can make a global film, which affects so many countries and affects sort of this worldwide epidemic. Zombies are great metaphors for the times we live in today, and that’s what I always find fascinating about them. It’s like THE WALKING DEAD, you know, the unconscious, and the metaphors for them are just really something I was inspired by.
What did Brad bring to the role and how did you work with him to kind of craft the character and his viewpoint?
Brad and his company, Plan B, bought the book and developed a screenplay before I got involved. He was always very hands on in developing it and working with it, and he’s an iconic movie star who has made such smart choices throughout his career and has such amazing tastes. For me, it was really a fantastic collaboration working with him because we share a lot of similar sensitivities. Developing this was just incredible, a lot of fun, because I never worked with an actor who was also a producer. It worked out really, really positively and so I enjoyed the process tremendously.
The book has a reputation for being more reflective, and everything we’ve seen here seems pretty brisk and fast. Does the movie ever sort of take a break to absorb more of those elements of the book?
Yes, it does take a break and become more reflective. It’s not what you guys saw here.
Sort of along the same point of trying to break out of the zombies and do something original, how are you able to use the public perceptions of zombies as a sort of starting point, where you don’t have to say, “Well this is what zombies are and this is how they work.”
I think there are all different kinds of zombies and lots of people who prefer slow zombies versus fast zombies and vice versa and so on. I think there’s a whole debate there, and as you will see in our film, how the story unfolds… you can get a taste of both, but you have to see the entire piece.
One of the most popular TV shows right now is THE WALKING DEAD, which is extremely violent. Are you concerned that going for a PG-13 is going to make it a little tame compared to what people expect from weekly TV viewing of zombies?
No, because we approach [our zombies] in a different way. I consciously designed the film in that way, and so I think we will overcome that.
Given the length of the production process, having to rewrite, reshoot, and all of that kind of that stuff, how do you keep it fresh for yourself?
I always try to stay objective, and to remove myself from the process and look at the film again. I must say it was really refreshing and actually a great thing that we redid the ending, because I never did that with any of my other movies so far. I realized that a lot of the great directors that I admire from [Ingmar] Bergman to [Federico] Fellini were always shooting, then going into the editing room, and shooting again. This process, back and forth, I think that was a really great thing that we were able to do that, and that the studio allowed us to do that. I think it made the movie better, and I think that sort of gave us a different reflection of it, because when you’re really in it and sometimes doing it, sometimes it gets so overwhelming that you might, for a moment, have to take a step back and see… how it feels altogether.
It seems like some of the more modern zombie movies have shied away from the actual term, the ‘z’ word. Is there a challenge to reclaim the word and avoid the sort of campy aspects to what we think of?
The idea is how I conceived the film, but how I felt the book was as well, is that the film should feel very real, that it could happen right now in the world we live in, and to make it as real as possible and sort of create that, because I didn’t want it to feel camp. I wanted it to feel very real, that it could happen actually to us today.
To that end, are there zombie movies in this world?
Yes, I think in this world, there were definitely zombie movies and there were actually characters in the film that talk about zombies as well.
Back to the other question, this is going to be PG-13, so you have to avoid blood and gore.
But most of the gore and blood, when you see the whole movie, I avoid it on purpose, intentionally.
This is just for my own pure personal curiosity. I love the shot of the zombies climbing up the wall. I think that’s a great new money shot injected into the pantheon of zombie movies we’ve never seen before. Tell me there are more surprises for us.
Yes, I think there are more surprises. [Group laughter] But, if I spoiled them, then there’s no more surprises.
Well, the airplane in there...
You saw in the new trailer, they put the airplane in there. That was not a surprise, but there are a few more left. You haven’t seen that in a zombie movie before, outbreak on an airplane.
That wasn’t the Israeli soldier [who got her hand cut off]?
The infected person on the plane. Was that the Israeli soldier with the hand cut off?
No, no. It was a different zombie.
What were some of the locations you shot in for the film? Did you actually go to Israel?
No, we shot in Malta for Israel. I went to Israel for casting purposes and went to Jerusalem a couple times, but we were shooting in Malta.
You mention that the film takes place over the course of a few days. Do we start seeing the breakdown of electricity and the infrastructure as the picture goes on?
Yes, there is a breakdown of infrastructure. I mean some of it is still working and some is breaking down, but yes, you will see that.
As far as how the footage we just saw plays out, is most of it from the first two acts or is there anything from the third act in there?
The plane going down is sort of part of the third act.
Obviously, adapting Max Brooks’ book is next to impossible because of all of the stories, but for fans of the book, as they’re watching the movie, are there going to be characters or mentions or nods to stories that are in the book?
Yes, like, for instance the Israeli characters, Jurgen Warmbrunn, he is a character and a couple other mentions we have. We tried to incorporate from the book.
What run time are you shooting for?
It’ll probably be a little short of two hours, 1:50 or something like that.
Brad has been quoted in the past as saying he’d like to see a World War Z trilogy. Is that to say this ends on a good note? Is there more story to tell?
Definitely, there could be more story to tell, yes.
Are you worried that zombie fans won’t embrace this film, especially as it has more reflective periods in addition to the action?
You know, there are some more reflective moments from the film, but you can’t, some zombie fans you will not be able to make happy and some zombie fans will embrace it and will love the movie. I think there will always be discussion and a little bit of controversy on every zombie movie, because there are definitely different camps of what people prefer. I hope that most of the zombie fans will appreciate all the new things we added to the movie that they haven’t seen before in this particular genre.
Are you hoping to bring a new audience because the movie is less gory and not everyone is a zombie fan?
For me, this is not just a zombie film. It’s more than that. It’s a global film. It’s a film about a global crisis and I think it’s sort of, in that sense… it’s a zombie film, but it also speaks about some global issues. I think in that sense, I feel it might bring in a different audience, hopefully, as well.
I was hoping you could talk a little bit more about the tone. Obviously it’s very dramatic and there’s a lot of action, but are there lighter moments as well?
Yeah, here and there, sprinkled throughout. But most of it is a pretty intense ride, like on the edge of your seat, pretty much from beginning to end. Even the more reflective moments, when it gets quiet, it’s like the tension comes from somewhere else.
One of the things we saw in the footage, which we don’t usually see in Hollywood blockbusters, was the male hero in the corner while the female had a machine gun blowing people away. So, in addition to this sort of global scale, is gender equity part of the whole aesthetic in the film?
Yeah, the great thing is that Brad’s character, Gerry Lane, is sort of the everyman hero, sort of the anti-hero in that sense. Ultimately, he’s not going to kill unless he’s forced to, and when he’s suddenly in that situation with a zombie where he has no choice. But he’s not your typical hero in that sense.
Have you done test screenings, and what have you learned from them?
That the audience really embraced the film. We did one and they just really loved the movie and it really went well and everybody was very excited. It seemed like the people who read the book were supportive of the film in that audience, and people who were zombie fans thought there were so many new things that they haven’t seen in zombie movies. It was a very successful screening.
Do you have any child zombies? Were they extras ever?
Yes, we had some extras, child zombies.
No baby zombies.
WORLD WAR Z scampers into theaters on June 21, 2013.
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
- 100 Lucky Ones will see AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 here in Austin on April 30th! -- 91 total posts 91 posts
- ‘I Have Something To Say To The People Of Meereen!!’ The Stormborn Returns For Tonight’s Third GAME OF THRONES Of 2014!! -- 126 total posts 49 posts
- Capone feels slightly in limbo about HEAVEN IS FOR REAL!!! -- 526 total posts 29 posts
- Capone desperately wants to pull the plug on TRANSCENDENCE!!! -- 280 total posts 24 posts
- Papa Vinyard Saw THE HATEFUL EIGHT Script Reading Last Night And Here's His Review! -- 38 total posts 15 posts
- ‘Why Don’t We Just Start Our Own Agency??’ Sunday Brings One Of The 13 Final MAD MENs!! -- 32 total posts 14 posts
- Two Images From Michael Fassbender’s MACBETH Movie!! -- 138 total posts 9 posts
- This Week's Saturday Shorts: Parkour, Compliments, and Getting Pooped on! -- 14 total posts 8 posts
- Harry rambles fondly about Eli Roth's THE GREEN INFERNO a real red meat Jungle Cannibalism kinda movie! -- 336 total posts 7 posts
- Watch the Opening 3 Minutes of Joss Whedon's IN YOUR EYES! -- 233 total posts 7 posts