Cool News
There's Definitely More Channing Tatum In The New Trailer For G.I. JOE: RETALIATION!!
The Kidd here...
Well, Paramount certainly held up their end of the bargain, adding more Channing Tatum to G.I. JOE: RETALIATION, as evidenced by the film's new trailer (via Yahoo!). How much more is yet to be determined until we get to see the finished film at the end of March, but I think it's safe to say he doesn't get whacked in the first 10 minutes anymore.
There's not much else new to see here, as just about all of this footage was a part of the film's previous marketing campaign before the movie was pulled from the 2012 summer calender about a month before release.
The ninjas fighting on the side of the mountain and the city destruction still look pretty cool, but I'm still not exactly optimistic for the rest of the film. Pushing it back a whole year for post-conversion 3-D is hardly the stuff that instills confidence.
I hear what was shown at BNAT was received fairly well though, so maybe there is hope for a fun popcorn flick to come from this yet.
-Billy Donnelly
"The Infamous Billy The Kidd"
Follow me on Twitter.
Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus-
+ Expand All
-
...I can't find a single damn to give about this movie.
-
Because there's no better time to release a $200 million movie than during March Break when your target audience is away on vacation. Just ask John Carter.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:28 a.m. CST
COBRA flags on the White House guarantee my attendance. COME ON.
by spacehog
I don't care what year they eventually release this in or why; that image alone is genius. Weird to see how much the effects quality is all over the map; compare the ninja mountainside stuff (which I swear I read somewhere is 100% CGI, which blows my mind) to the shot of Bruce Willis in the doughnut-ing car. I know different effects houses handle different shots, and it's two completely different kinds of effects, but that's some huge disparity right there.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:28 a.m. CST
Channing Tatum sucks! I was excited that he wasn't going to be in this. Dammitt!!!!
by yeah i'm a jerk!
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:30 a.m. CST
So is there a male stripper scene added to this GI JOE
by Samuel Fulmer
Maybe Shipwreck can come out on stage and dance to In the Navy by the Village People.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:30 a.m. CST
Wow. I was excited for this before summer. After this trailer, I'll never see it.
by Mr. Moe
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:33 a.m. CST
Instead of Academy Award Nominee Channing Tatum, will he be advertised as People's Sexiest Man Alive Channing Tatum?
by openthepodbaydoorshal
-
...is to include Olivia Munn boobs.
-
But it's probably going to suck, if the first one is any indication. I guess you never know though.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:34 a.m. CST
Tatum has what? 2-3 seconds more footage in the trailer? For all we know it's still in the beginning (shown out of sequence) and he still dies.
by googamooga
We can hope.
-
I loved the first movuie, can't wait to see the sequel!!
-
That's when I'll be seeing it, if at all
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:40 a.m. CST
The first one was one of the worst movies I have ever seen...
by Mikey Wood
...so, yeah...not in any hurry to see this.
-
I have been watching this trailer for over a year now
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:41 a.m. CST
Over the top Action? Unrealistic Plot? Cheesy Dialog? Sounds like GI JOE to me
by wohomerhoo
-
GI JOE has RED's Willis and more CGI than a Transformers movie. Still, it looks so much better than "Wild Wild West 2013".
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:43 a.m. CST
CHANNING TATUM STILL DIES IDIOT!!! THEY JUST SHOW HIM MORE IN THE TRAILER!!! YOU THINK THEY REWROTE THE WHOLE FUCKING MOVIE FOR 1 ACTOR!!! you fucking dumbass........
by wannabedirector
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:44 a.m. CST
Why do they keep showing the lame on-liners? This isn't James Bond. Tatum is lame, but he was the bomb in The Eagle, yo!
by Stereotypical Evil Archer
-
Got me pretty good. Especially the reaction.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:45 a.m. CST
CHANNING TATUM SUCKS JUST LIKE HE SUCKS IN JUPITER ASCENDING!!! OVERRATED!!! BY A DONKEY SHIT!!!!
by wannabedirector
-
"General Hawk, it's Doc at Headquarters. Duke's come out of his coma!" <p> - I"m calling this right now.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:49 a.m. CST
MOVIE DOESN'T LOOK THAT BAD EVEN WITHOUT CAPTAIN DICKHEAD IN IT!!! OVERRATED ACTOR!!! HE SUCKED IN A MOVIE ABOUT MALE STRIPPERS AND HE IS THE SEXIEST MAN ALIVE!!! LMFAO if you can't crush it in that movie, your career is a turd waiting to be flushed.....
by wannabedirector
-
Is that Cobra's satellite, the giant threat in the movie, probably the Big Thing The Joes Need To Stop blowing up in the trailer? Hopefully they need to split into teams and travel the world to find the parts before Cobra does. Now that I would watch.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:57 a.m. CST
And WHY IS TATUM CHANNING a star???? He's frigggggin CROSSEYED!!!!!!!!
by JMoe
-
TATUM CHANNINGS name in the movie shouldn't be Duke, it should be CROSSEYED!!!!!
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 11:59 a.m. CST
Forget SNAKE EYES, the new hero of GI JOE is CROSS EYED!!!!!!!
by JMoe
the end
-
Dec. 12, 2012, noon CST
take it easy on him being cross-eyed, a handicap is never to make fun of, he is just a dickslap of an actor and its all downhill from here with that turd of a career......
by wannabedirector
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 12:02 p.m. CST
Even THE ROCK looks like he's forcing a smile for this movie . . . .
by JMoe
-
Isn't he into ass play with T. Cruise?
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 12:09 p.m. CST
who needs Cobra - we're living our own Commie takeover of America - most are too blind to notice.
by cozy
-
This film is called G.I JOE:Retaliation and after you see it, you’ll know the name and what it stands for.
-
This could work, in a A-Team movie sort of way. The Good: 1) There seems to be more emphasis on the vehicles. For my money, G.I. Joe was always about the awesome vehicles. The figures/characters were kinda secondary, IMHO. I like that they seem to be trying to walk that line between plausibility and fantasy that the earlier 80s toys had (like the Skystriker and the Rattler), rather than the rediculousness of the first movie's exo-suits or the later toys that started to get really silly (remember the eco-warriors?). 2) Cobra doing the big, take-over-the-world-with-satellites thang that Cobra does so well. This is very good. Let Cobra be Cobra, and let G.I. Joe be G.I. Joe. 3) Bruce Willis FTW. 4) Ray Stevenson is in it. Win. 5) Ray Park as Snake-Eyes is always a win. The Bad: 1) Jonathan Pryce has a tendency to get a wee bit TOO campy when playing a villain. In Tomorrow Never Dies he started off well, but he descended into cartoon territory by the end of the movie. As such, I dunno if I believe him as the US President. He's better as a small, flustered character like good 'ol Sam Lowry. On the other hand, it might work for a movie like this. The Middling: 1) I don't really care one way or the other about Channing Tatum. He doesn't work as a G.I. Joe leader/commander, but he's fine as a random G.I. Joe character. Plus, I'd simply be a little annoyed if they killed off Duke, regardless of the actor playing him. 2) I'm not a huge Dwayne Johnson fan, but he looks like he could be fine. In my mind's eye though, I think of Roadblock as more of a Bubba Smith type of character, you know? 3) Adrienne Palicki? Meh. She's fine, but not a terribly strong or memorable actor. Basically, I PREFER to see two STRONG actors as Duke and Scarlett, along with a nice love triangle between Duke, Scarlett and Snake-Eyes, a la G.I. Joe Resolute, but whattayagonnado? Here's hoping they hire Warren Ellis to write G.I. Joe 3!
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 12:26 p.m. CST
I liked Scarlett in the last one and I'm bummed she's killed off. I like the blowing up of London scene in this one.
by Margot Tenenbaum
Never liked the Rock and I haven't liked Willis since the Fifth Element. I'll rent this just like I rented the RISE OF THE COBRA SURFER. plinkett <3
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 12:26 p.m. CST
This is the closest thing to a REAL G.I.Joe we're going to get.
by Deceased Fan
I'm still excited.
-
This one's got 0%.
-
Anyone else disappointed that one man didn't turn out to be Pa Kent? PA KENT: Well, son, you should probably just let those ninjas nuke-fuck the planet rather than endanger your G.I. Joe codename...
-
I would buy her a lobster dinner. Word.
-
that first movie looked nothing like GI joe at all.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 12:47 p.m. CST
Push the date back another two years so people can forget it's a sequel.
by Christian Sylvain
-
I will never see a film where London is destroyed like this! Why not destroy New York? Clearly no one likes that city anyway.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 12:53 p.m. CST
How does Bruce keep from sliding in the back of that El Camino at the end?
by Somerichs
Pretty cool trick...
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 12:55 p.m. CST
yea this is finally starting to look like GI Joe
by DidntPullOutInTimeCop
or Action Force as it was called here back in the day. Just wish the movie title head honchos here had the balls to call the movie that, just for nostalgia. GI Joe: Action Force
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:02 p.m. CST
Remember when the Workaholics went to see GI Joe 2 last year.
by kindofabigdeal
When they shot the show they didn't know that it was going to be pushed back. Wonder if they will work that into next seasons show.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:02 p.m. CST
And thsi talkback needs more "I've been staring cross eyed for about a month now."
by kindofabigdeal
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:14 p.m. CST
so wait u puit more chanum tater in the trailer but no tanum chatter butt shots?
by vulturess
isnt that what he's known for?
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:16 p.m. CST
The Rock is a stud. Reminds me of that friend you had in high school who was a senior and made sure no one fucked with you when you were a freshman, because every guy in school rolled over when he walked by.
by Particularly Hard Vato
Seriously- the guy has no "douchebag" factor whatsoever...
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:18 p.m. CST
RE: "Forget SNAKE EYES, the new hero of GI JOE is CROSS EYED!!!!!!! "
by Stalkeye
LMMFAO In spite of Tatum getting additional scenes, I still hope his character (Duke) gets killed off. Just my 2 cents.
-
(or is that something I need to do on my end?)
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:22 p.m. CST
Hated the 1st one but the Rock's involvement has me optimistic.
by Wcwlkr
As far as Channing Tatum my impression of him changed after 21 Jump Street. Loved him in that and Haywire so I'm cool with him being added to the action. It made no sense to off Duke anyway. If they couldn't do it in the 80s movie you can't do it now LOL.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:24 p.m. CST
Though I like the Lupe Fiasco better than the Jay-Z cut. It's funny that they'd choose that song that speaks of the horrors of Child soldiers.
by Wcwlkr
Just goes to show that the hollywood marketers don't actually listen to the words of the songs they choose. They just here it's got that militiristic sound to the beat that the kids listen to nowadays LOL.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:30 p.m. CST
Wow, Dwayne does not look happy to STILL be promoting this movie
by AntonStark
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:45 p.m. CST
Didnt' they show the Space Weapon explode at the end of that trailer?
by Rob
They showed the ending!
-
Honestly, I was kind of meh about the trailer up until that point. (Ah, for want of a Carbombya joke.) I'm still not feeling the 3D revamp, however, but that's me.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:50 p.m. CST
@particularly hard vato, good observation about The Rock - and great screen name, btw!
by kevred
One of the best I've seen here. Well done.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:53 p.m. CST
The CG here looks more fun than it does in Man of Steel. And it looks like two movies - GI Joe, then it turns into Red 2 with Willis & The Rock
by kevred
It already seems odd to have Bruce Willis and this suburban stuff shoehorned into a big popcorn CG action fest. Trying to also shoehorn more Tatum into the film seems like the tipping point to turn the film into a mess. Which, to the 10-year-old in me, is too bad, as this has the look of what could be (or could have been) a fun, endearing big-dumb-action spectacle. Looks way more interesting than the first one. But I'm getting the feeling they never really knew what they wanted the film to be, and now are even confused about who it's supposed to star.
-
Yes, but but this cost 2.5 times more to make than Hunger Games (John Carter cost 3 times as much as HG). Granted, it is being released at the end of the month (like Hunger Games was) and will avoid the ghost-town weekend that is the middle of March Break (unlike John Carter). Being the first movie of that series (and based on a popular series of books) there was high anticipation for Hunger Games. It would have done well regardless of what month it was released. This is a sequel to a movie that had less-than-stellar reviews and only an OK Box Office ($300 million worldwide). There was little anticipation for this movie last year before it got pulled from the Summer schedule. Doubtful the 9 month delay has done much of anything to change that. I doubt it will do as poorly as John Carter. However, I also doubt it will come anywhere close to doing as well as Hunger Games. It may not even do as well as the original, even with the inflated BO that 3D brings.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:58 p.m. CST
I really don't get the Tatum popularity. There's just nothing special about the guy, in any way, at all.
by kevred
I get that a lot of women think he's good looking. But he's good looking in a very ordinary way. There are tons of actors that look as good as this guy, and guys with his body are a dime a dozen in pop culture. Beyond that, he's a complete stiff - like a male Pamela Anderson, minus her personality, charm, and social activism. That shouldn't be enough to make anyone stand out. But then, this is the age of tripe like Twilight and 50 Shades of Gray standing out. It's like the worst of modern repressed-mainstream-women psychology has taken over the entire culture. And I say this as someone whose beliefs could accurately be called feminist.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 1:59 p.m. CST
CHANNING TATUM IS A MONOSYLLABIC MEATHEAD!!! CAN'T BELIEVE SOCIETY HAS FALLEN SO LOW THAT HE AND THAT UGLY FAT FUCK JONAH HILL ARE STARS!!! FUCK THIS WORLD!!!FACT!!!
by CreepyThinMan
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 2 p.m. CST
So the first one sucked (even though it's at least on the same level as the cartoon), but this looks good?!?
by Monroville
Really guys? How can any real "fan" of G.I. JOE "not" have a good, fun, stupid time with the first movie? Sure, Channing was a plank of wood, but we get the terrorist guy actually being able to play a good guy for once, Adabisi from OZ, Super hot Scarlett AND the Baroness, a good pace with lots of action... I just don't get it. And how is it that Stormshadow is coming back when he was deader than dead in the last movie? And Scarlett and EVERYONE from the last movie is dead too? This is along the level of whacking Hicks, Bishop and Newt at the beginning of ALIEN 3 (okay, maybe not THAT big.. but still pretty big). You don't kill off characters that are played by B-list celebs that won't cost you a shitload of money to begin with before, during or right after the opening credits. I think I'll be downloading this one and keep my finger on the fast-forward button.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 2:08 p.m. CST
What they couldn't afford a Jay Z track? I thought it was standard procedure.
by Cedric Ford
-
fucking hate that turdblossom. can't belive he is so many movies, when he can't act to save his life
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 2:27 p.m. CST
I could go for another star wars rumor right now how about you guys
by Stephen
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 2:27 p.m. CST
The white stripes trailer was the best one, good use of 7 nation army
by Rebel Scumb
I still think this movie looks good, was dissappointed it wasn't released last summer. But would be better if it had scarlett, Baroness and destro
-
cowbell makes everything better
-
Forgot his name. The general one. Maybe Dennis Quad?
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 2:37 p.m. CST
CREEPS. I hate Chaffing TaintYum as much as the next guy, but got to admit 21 Jump Street was awesome.
by Deceased Fan
-
Hasn't this been done enough in movies? It's borderline Cliche'.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 2:40 p.m. CST
I WOULD PAY BIG BUCKS TO SEE A MIDDLE EASTERN CITY IN A MASS DESTRUCTION SCENE
by big_dicks_cum_from_small_beginnings
Mecca and Islamabad would be nice for starters.
-
A polite question sir, are you on twitter?
-
I think that's the only time I can describe him as 'great'.
-
Ha! Fuck you Camden market indie rockers!
-
No matter how much more entertaining and satisfying this movie may be than the first one was (and it looks to be that way), it will be overshadowed and RUINED by the idea that characters such as Duke, Scarlett, and Hawk are "dead". There is no way these characters will die unless hasbro and the people behind this movie are on a financial suicide mission. IN the first trailer when its quoted "they're all dead" ... who's to say what or who that is referring to. All of the people on the scene? All of them in that one particular base. All the people at that one particular battle? Clearly ... it's not ALL the GIJOES, or there will be no further movies, comics, stories. This movie is meant to be episodic and so Hawk, Scarlett, they are just away on leave or on a different mission when these events go down. Or perhaps many of the them are jailed somewhere and not "dead". And even if they did go for something as utterly stupid as killing off all the joes as a way to simply justify not getting back the actors to play them, that does not explain where the hell DESTRO and THE BARONESS are during this one.
-
As long as the movie still has 0x the Rachel Nichols I still don't care.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 2:48 p.m. CST
This looks like crap. I have a bad feeling for Masters of the Universe.
by Just_Some_Guy
John Cho should stick with sucking Justin Beiber's weewee
-
BTW. Any "GIJOE" movie without Destro and the Baroness (especially if this is the second movie and STILL no "real" Destro) ... is like having a Harry Potter movie without Harry Potter appearing in it. EPIC FAIL in storytelling.
-
You better come back in March to referee me and zarles. However I have a sneaking suspicion that I'll be eating a bag of dicks.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 3:01 p.m. CST
Killing Channing Tatum early on would have been stealing from Iron Eagle II.
by Fries Against
-
Or nearly the same as the old trailer.
-
Practising the clarinet!
-
Iv'e been taking a bit of a hiatus on a count of a few Whack-job losers who further diminished the Talkbacks to a proverbial Shitfest. (Well at least one received the Banhammer as of late. LMMFAO) Most of you Guys are Cool though. Other than that, Life is good Comrade. Yeah, the first thing that came to mind was the spat between you and Zarles. And i gotta admit, at first i thought he was full of shit too until he delved further into the Screening citing the scene in which Cobra Commander abandons Destro while saying "you're not in the Band". And that sound like something the Director of that justin Bieber Movie would allow to be used. Zarles called it but took your skepticism a bit too personally IMO. But let's all leave as water under the bridge and all agree wether or not the sequel with "Added" footage will suck. Judging from the trailer, They got a few things right especially the satilite weapon that harkens back to the MASS Device Miniseries. Oh, And Cobra Commander actually looks like Cobra Commander. I'm hoping that atleast Retaliation will fare better than Rise of Cobra. Cause Fool me twice... (0:/
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 3:26 p.m. CST
Well, it looks about as good as I'd expect a movie about fucking toys to be
by kidicarus
-
Yeah I actually got confirmation from a trusted friend that the Kicked out of the band thing was true. So I suspect our buddy Zarles was right, but it was the way he said it that I had a problem with. Oh well, I don't mind eating a little crow when called for. Water under the bridge, indeed. Yo Joe!
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 3:38 p.m. CST
the destruction of london is way better than the destruction of gotham city in TDKR
by julia
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 3:42 p.m. CST
The minute I read the words "more Channing Tatum" something strange happened to my special purpose.
by AzulTool
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 3:51 p.m. CST
I wonder if any slutty nerd chicks have fucked channing and screamed out "more, channing tatum!"
by Stephen
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 4 p.m. CST
icarus2, TWITTER IS THE TOOL OF THE DEVIL!!! BUT I AM ON FACEBOOK!!!FACT!!!
by CreepyThinMan
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 4:01 p.m. CST
Delay this an additional 9 months and release it in January 2014
by Deaft0ne
So it can be converted to 4D and have 2 Tatums.
-
Knowing not to see this is half the battle.
-
...seriously, a film based on a kid toyline from the 80s. Looks like there is at least an inkling of an attempt to make it somewhat decent. The first one, all crap aside, was better than all three of Bay's attempts. And was that Jinx, the female yellow ninja? This vehicle is the same caliber as Star Trek, all boom booms with little story, and yet this gets more rage than that flacid attempt. Star Trek isn't about fucking explosions, its about exploration along a final frontier...Yo Joe on the otherhand is about explosions and prepubescent wars in your sandbox. So why the fuck not? I hate Tatum as Duke, and if he dies it won't be the first time. Who's to say the other Joes aren't just MIA or something...or for that matter, who even cares? Its not like killing them off is going to effect toy sales. Looks like what I expected...except for the North Korea jab. That shit was funny as fuck.
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 4:36 p.m. CST
Hey, is that Tatum over there?" "Why yes, it is." "What is he doing?" "It looks like he's channing!
by Mr. Voodoo Potato Head
-
really ruins the strict realism of these films for me
-
Dec. 12, 2012, 4:45 p.m. CST
I heard they're digitally inserting Channing Tatum into The Outlaw Josey Wales
by lv_426
That way women can have Josey Wales and Channing Tatum syndrome at the same time!
-
It'd be more entertaining, right?
-
But alas...
-
I mean the look on Marlon Wayans face when she is running on the treadmill is the highlight of the pic. That man came in his pants.
-
Fucking megastar, bitches. Get ready for all the Tatum you can handle (and them some more) over the next 30 years. The man's a Hollywood titan. Cruise did it ten years younger thou. That's why he is still the Greatest Movie Star of All-time (tm). I can't wait for their inevitable team-up. Maybe reboot the Lethal Weapon franchise with these two? /green font
-
That film just fucked up London!
-
http://thefilmstage.com/trailer/trailer-for-guillermo-del-toros-pacific-rim-brings-robot-vs-monster-mayhem/ AICN...a day late and a dollar short evey time.
-
That looked like fun...can almost see what a good Macross film would look like.
-
I'll watch it.
-
Destro is all over the place but Cobra is either walking or standing. If we can't hear him talk, can we at least see him doing stuff?
-
Zartan is the President.
-
I had a nightmare not long ago where it was maybe 15 years in the future...at least. Most of the actor heroes of our past (your Fords, Arnie's, Hanks, Cruise...whoever...most of the big name guys) have either passed on or are retired. The best of them, who you could rely on for solid work, were long gone. New generations have come through, standards have fallen. Channing Tatum accepts an Oscar for Best Actor in a leading role...only because there was no one better than him to compete with. The Gen Y's, today's tweens have grown up and taken hold of leading the world and today's current excuses for thespians and their massive lackings in talent dominate the world's entertainment mediums. Like a talkbacker lamented in the Transformers 4 post, the Dustin Hoffmans of today have no chance against the supposedly aesthetically pleasing though vacuous model / actors / singers that we deal with and endure. The Hoffmans and Gene Hackmans of the world until the early 2000's had 40 years worth of leading and headlining the film industry. Ugly but talented. The best these kind of guys...like Buscemi, Giamatti, etc can usually hope for is a supporting role or go onto TV. With few exceptions. The same happened with music too. Older men like Billy Joel, Phil Collins and Elton John were kings, pop idols to everyone...even teenage girls in the 80's. Can't find that anymore. Too much image, too little substance.
-
...Enough said
-
Being well over the age of 30, i've zero understanding of the relevance of this Tatum entity, so his involvement or lack there of, in this movie means sweet fa to me. But i like Bruce Willis and on that indepth and compelling note I think i'll watch this.
-
Dec. 13, 2012, 5:41 a.m. CST
Still not enough Channing Tatum in this movie...
by annapaquinspussyjuice
-
Dec. 13, 2012, 7:24 a.m. CST
Boycott 3D -- if you see this turkey, see it only in 2D!
by Michael Morning
-
Dec. 13, 2012, 8:14 a.m. CST
Well, the blu-ray had better come with a 'Channing Tatum-less Cut'!!! >:-(
by Forthesakeofhumanity
In fact, why not just leave this newly added Channing Tatum footage for after the credits!?! >:-D
-
She goes to those girly sites where they shorten things for extra cuteness. Totes jels and on the regs, that sort of thing. So in addition to Chan Tates I have Tarder Sauce the cat and Hey Girl... to deal with. However, she just recently ended the 5 year blow job embargo, so things could always be worse.
-
How are they going to get ladies and gay men to go see this?
-
Ok so obviously Duke is the one falling into that water well, gets knocked the fucked out and goes into a coma then in the end Doc calls "The Rock"and says "Duke came out of his coma" Then the Joes look at each other and say "COBRAAAAAA oops ahem YO JOE!!!!"
-
Dec. 13, 2012, 2:17 p.m. CST
haha they need a choice on the blu-ray like those wide screen/full screen dvds but it'll be "less tatum/more tatum"
by Stephen
-
I cannot wait to see this...it looks as awesome as On deadly ground. It's that special.
-
Dec. 13, 2012, 5:38 p.m. CST
This has a real bad 'Under Siege 2:Dark territory' feeling to it.
by peter
-
Dec. 13, 2012, 10:14 p.m. CST
taylor_kitsch_leprosy, I think you're over-analyzing...
by RandySavage
Things today aren't that different from the 90s, 80s, 70s, etc. The Attractive Leading Man/Woman goes back to Hollywood's beginnings... it's almost part of the definition. And there are plenty of A-listers today that aren't where they are for their looks, and a number did get in for their looks, ended up being decent. Tatum is no Gary Oldman, but's he not that bad, and Kitsch was pretty decent in FNL.
-
THAT'S what crap rap music sounds like! A random Jay-Z or Kanye track is the least of your problems if you hate rap music.
-
As does every film. Can't we just use digital technology to put more Tatum in every film every new film? That's the kinda world I want to live in!!
-
Dec. 14, 2012, 4:09 p.m. CST
Thank Feck, 'Creepy Man' it's not just me...he is indeed a Pituitary Retard with all the onscreen charisma of dick cheese
by KillaKane
...Actually that would be a more apt screen moniker for him. The only thing I'd like to watch him in is a tank full of hungry Gators.
Top Talkbacks
- Spoilery early review of MAN OF STEEL!! -- 350 total posts 318 posts
- Holy Crossover!! Magneto’s Boy Quicksilver To Speed About In Whedon’s AVENGERS 2 And Singer’s X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST?? -- 317 total posts 105 posts
- A review of Refn and Gosling's ONLY GOD FORGIVES, direct from Cannes!! -- 108 total posts 89 posts
- Green-Band and Red-Band trailers for the new Jason Sudeikis & Jennifer Aniston VACATION ripoff, WE'RE THE MILLERS are here!! -- 144 total posts 52 posts
- Jon Stewart casts Gael Garcia Bernal for his directorial debut, ROSEWATER!! -- 43 total posts 41 posts
- The Friday Docback Revisits DOCTOR WHO Season 7!! A Fuller Review Of 'The Name of the Doctor,' And More!! -- 39 total posts 39 posts
- Harry dives into STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS' spoilers to reveal the truth behind the blockbuster we're seeing! -- 1444 total posts 37 posts
- Ron Howard's latest trailer sure is a RUSH!!! -- 64 total posts 35 posts
- Tom Cruise Won’t Go Solo For MAN FROM UNCLE!! -- 31 total posts 31 posts
- John Ary's Video Review Of THE HANGOVER PART III!! -- 29 total posts 29 posts