Quint loves Seven Psychopaths for celebrating the art of screenwriting and the awesomeness of the Walken!
Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with a few quick words on Martin McDonagh’s new flick, Seven Psychopaths. Unlike Affleck’s Argo, which seems to be getting fairly unanimous love from my colleagues, McDonagh’s film seems to be a bit more divisive.
Oddly, both films celebrate the art form of cinema. Argo highlights the industry and pre-production and Seven Psychopaths is a very focused deconstruction of the struggles of screenwriting.
Colin Farrell plays an insecure, drunk screenwriter desperately trying to craft a story out of a good title as the world around him starts to mirror his concept, bizarre characters and all.
In my Argo review I praised that film’s character actor ensemble and did a roll call. Here’s the roll call for Seven Psychopaths: Christopher Walken (that would be enough in any other movie, but he’s one of the leads!), Sam Rockwell, Tom Waits, Woody Harrelson, Abbie Cornish, Gabourey Sidibe, Michael Pitt, Michael Stuhlbarg, Kevin Corrigan and Harry Dean Stanton. I left out Colin Farrell from that list and that might have been a bit unfair because for a leading man, he has a lot of character actor traits. Just look at his bizarro world performance in Daredevil if you don’t believe me.
Christopher Walken in particular hasn’t had a role as perfectly tailored for him in years. There was a period of time where Walken was appearing in everything, big and small, and then he kind of dropped off the map. He was still working, but not omnipresent as he was for the decade after Pulp Fiction.
Walken’s Hans doesn’t just go for the weird, funny Walken, but also plays to his dramatic strengths as well. There’s a scene where he sits down with Woody Harrelson’s Charlie that has Walken delivering a line that works on at least three different levels. There’s a depth to his character here that was a very welcome surprise.
His particular cadence and personality have made him kind of a goofy actor in most films, but people forget that he’s one of those rare actors that can easily portray comedy (The Rundown), tragedy (The Deer Hunter) and menace (True Romance). This role lets him play to all his strengths.
And he gets to play with some other fantastic actors. Walken getting to spend most of the movie playing with Sam Rockwell is one of the reasons I unapologetically took to this movie. Those are two of our best working character actors and both of them are playing rather complex people who seem innocently silly on the surface.
Farrell has a bit more work to do as a character. While he is without a doubt the main character, he has to spend most of the movie as the observer. He’s playing McDonagh, or at least an exaggerated version of him, as I imagine the writer/director was during the writing of this script.
He probably had the exact same journey that Farrell’s Marty did (and I don’t think that name is a coincidence). Writers can be struck with paralysis as they struggle to get a coherent mix of their ideology and understanding of storytelling down on the page. Making Farrell’s character that exact guy, a pacifist trying to write a movie about psychopaths, forces him to be the straight man as the world gets crazier and crazier all around him.
From a writer’s perspective, this story is incredibly smart. I mean, half of the movie is the writer sitting between literal representations of both sides of his mind. On the one side is Rockwell, who is all about the big, over the top audience satisfying violence and on the other is Walken, a man who has every reason in the world to embrace that, but has a concrete moral character that can not be swayed no matter how much he enjoys listening to Rockwell go off.
The theme of the movie is exactly represented by its three leads. That’s such an incredibly smart bit of writing. It’s simple, but easy to overlook if you just want to go for a fun time at the movies.
And the movie is fun. And funny. It is one of those kinds of movies I feel was made specifically for me, from concept to casting to final product. It’s like I was the focus group for this one.
So, I love this one. Hopefully some of you guys got to catch it this weekend and can let me know if I’m all alone with that opinion or not.
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
+ Expand All
Oct. 14, 2012, 7:11 p.m. CST
THO, it DOES bog down a bit in the 2nd act and the ending is a bit of a .........meh... But overall, it's just so well written and performed I didn't care.
Oct. 14, 2012, 7:13 p.m. CST
Saw this immediately after work on Friday. McDonagh delivers a film every bit as satisfying as In Bruges, which I thought was the best film the year it came out. He is firmly atop my list of must watch directors!
Oct. 14, 2012, 7:48 p.m. CST
by Dan Anthony
The charm of the actors and wit and cohesion of the dialog held it together. Very cool film, and agree with Quint completely.
Oct. 14, 2012, 7:51 p.m. CST
My wife and I both saw it this afternoon. While it may not be everyone's cup of tea, there was quite a bit of laughter throughout the theater. If my wife stays awake an engaged during a movie, thats saying something.
Oct. 14, 2012, 7:53 p.m. CST
You're right Quint. It's funny and smart; two traits that we usually don't get together these days.
Oct. 14, 2012, 8:17 p.m. CST
Sorry Quint... I mean I enjoyed it well enough, but it just seemed too Tarantino-esque. For me, the thing that made IN BRUGES work was the contrast of the quaint European backdrop, and Brendan Gleeson's earnest appreciation of it, with Farrell's anguish and the looming violence. In this, everything was sort of pitched at the same level of winking "outrageousness," so it all paradoxically came off as kind of self-conscious and dated. Again, it was entertaining; I laughed, I cringed; but I just felt I'd seen it all before.
Oct. 14, 2012, 8:59 p.m. CST
by Stereotypical Evil Archer
Martin McDonagh's style of writing is the opposite of Damon Lindelof's. Damon Lindelof's style of using a never explained mythology as the Macguffin is the epitome of lazy, piss pour, shit writing.
Oct. 14, 2012, 9:05 p.m. CST
It's on youtube if you haven't. Go for the NSFW version. Fun stuff. Just like the movie itself.
Oct. 14, 2012, 9:11 p.m. CST
Watched it a few weeks back at a screening. Damn, it was absolutely hilarious.
So this isn't Smokin' Aces 2.0?
Oct. 14, 2012, 10:17 p.m. CST
wishes it was a fourth this interesting, well written and not shitty
Oct. 14, 2012, 10:19 p.m. CST
she's the only reviewer that matters ... writes circles around the next 10 combined
Oct. 14, 2012, 10:20 p.m. CST
Smokin' Aces you didn't care what it was supposed to be about - it was a pure glorification of style and worked well on that level
Oct. 15, 2012, 7:41 a.m. CST
Oct. 15, 2012, 8:16 a.m. CST
My wife and I both felt that the cast meshed perfectly, and that the acting was dead on. There were times, while watching this movie, that I found myself staring at the screen, overcome by what I was hearing.
Oct. 15, 2012, 8:29 a.m. CST
I liked it.
Oct. 15, 2012, 10:01 a.m. CST
Oct. 15, 2012, 10:03 a.m. CST
Oct. 15, 2012, 10:38 a.m. CST
by Andrew Coleman
It will catch on once it hits Redbox/Streaming. Cult classic easily.
Oct. 15, 2012, 11:22 a.m. CST
Oct. 15, 2012, 11:38 a.m. CST
by ass clown
I was on board from the grt go with this movie and loved it. This reminds me of my experience with Jim Carreys the Cable Guy when I was cracking up to a movie that people just didnt seem to get. Fuck other people that didnt find this movie hilarious and amazing.
Oct. 15, 2012, 12:37 p.m. CST
I thought I'd leave this movie in a good mood, but not completely satisfied. But wow, it was amazing. Funny, smart, great acting, great characters, great plot, amazing subplots. Its the best movie of the year so far.
- The Friday Docback Crawls ‘Into The Dalek’!! Reader Reaction For DOCTOR WHO S08E02 Is Here!! + HornOrSilk's 'Breaking Bubbles and Other Stories' Big Finish Audio Review, Clips, And More!! -- 385 total posts 19 posts
- Who is in consideration to take the role of Snake in the ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK remake!?! -- 636 total posts 13 posts
- A Few Promo Images From EXODUS: GODS AND KINGS Bring Ridleyish Spectacle!! -- 203 total posts 12 posts
- WALKING DEAD!! BOARDWALK EMPIRE!! AGENTS OF SHIELD!! STAR WARS REBELS!! SOUTH PARK!! NEW GIRL!! HOMELAND!! GOTHAM!! FLASH!! SURVIVOR!! RESURRECTION!! PARENTHOOD!! BURGERS!! BLACKLIST!! BANG!! VOICE!! SLEEPY!! PERSON!! UTOPIA!! ANARCHY!! Z!! More Than 200 Autumn Premiere Dates!! -- 25 total posts 8 posts
- Abortionist Killers On PBS!! HOUDINI Hits History!! Angie Returns To THE DOME!! New DALLAS, PARADISE, WOLF, WILD, MASTERCHEF, MODEL, NINJA, HOTEL, BEACH, & RAW!! PARTNERS & MISTRESSES Finales!! UNAUTHORIZED SAVED BY THE BELL STORY!! Annaleigh Ashford On CRAIG!! Herc’s Monday TV Talkback!! -- 5 total posts 5 posts
- Fantastic Fest 2014 Trailer Wave Part 2! -- 14 total posts 5 posts
- Will there be a change of roster in Avengers: Age of Ultron and if so, who's gonna be on it? -- 303 total posts 4 posts
- Two More BIG BROTHER Nominations!! The Return Of ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN!! MI6 On PBS!! FALLING SKIES Finale!! New STRAIN, MANHATTAN, MASTERS, NAKED, RAY, RECKLESS, BEACHFRONT, BREATHLESS, KARDASHIANS, WIPEOUT!! No LEFTOVERS Finale!! Herc’s Sunday TV Talkback!! -- 24 total posts 3 posts
- Is this what Doctor Doom looks like in Josh Trank's FANTASTIC FOUR?! -- 312 total posts 3 posts
- Final PICKS & PEEKS of Aug 2014: LEGEND OF HELL HOUSE, Zombies, FOSSE, RATS, Nukes & Teens!!! -- 349 total posts 2 posts