Cool News
Capone reviews Paul Thomas Anderson's THE MASTER in 70mm!!!
Hey everyone. Capone in Chicago here.
I know a lot of people are going to walk out of the latest from writer-director Paul Thomas Anderson and think that they need to see it one or two more times just to get to the film's deeper meanings and the sources of its underlying tension. If I may be so bold, I don't think that's necessary; I think this may be Anderson's most in-your-face, on-the-surface work, and I don't level that as a criticism. I just sincerely doubt any additional digging is required; the scenes as they play out make the themes clearly and precisely evident.
And while we're talking about things that aren't necessary or relevant, can we drop the Scientology discussion? THE MASTER is not a film about scientology or L. Ron Hubbard. Sure, Anderson borrows some of the dogma and practices of the relatively new religion, but the film isn't some classless exposé. Between this film and THERE WILL BE BLOOD, it's become clear that Anderson has a fascination (some might call it a healthy disrespect) for religious leaders. He seem less interested in what they're preaching and more in how they're preaching it. He also explores the idea that there is the thinnest of lines between being a spiritual guide and a crazy person.
There were times in THE MASTER where I simply had to tune out what Philip Seymour Hoffman's Lancaster Dodd (frequently referred to as "the Master" by his followers) was saying because it didn't matter. This is an examination about his methods, how his delivery sells his beliefs, and the ways he draws people into his science-based following. Dodd twists the will of people seeking something different than worshipping long-dead icons; he's selling them the future. A kind of time travel is the basis of Dodd's practice, and it's beyond fascinating watching Hoffman bring people (including me) under his spell. I recall people complaining that they thought Hoffman's talents were wasted in his relatively small role in MONEYBALL. If you really thought that, you weren't paying attention. When he locks eyes on you, you're caught; and in THE MASTER, he has the unblinking eyes of a hunter.
Adopting a look that reminded me of a middle-aged Charles Foster Kane, Dodd meets his match when confronted with Freddie Sutton (Joaquin Phoenix), a former Navy man fresh out of World War II (the film is set mostly in 1950) who has no trouble getting into one mess after another at every turn. Freddie was psychologically damaged from what he experienced during the war, and now he wanders the country aimless and drunk off homemade liquor. He is on a first-name basis with trouble, and that eventually leads him to stow away on a boat inhabited by Dodd, his wife Mary Sue (a riveting Amy Adams) and a few dozen guests at their daughter's wedding. He wakes up hungover in a bed, and is told that he now works for Mr. Dodd. With little argument, he agrees.
It's clear from the start that Dodd has taken on Freddie as the ultimate challenge. At one point, Dodd makes says if Freddie is not cured of his wicked ways then it is they who have failed him. Freddie's scars run deep, and using a series of questions and exercises (called "being processed"), Dodd wants to reveal the spirits from Freddie's past (past lives is a big part of this religious referred to as "The Cause"), cast them out, and fortify his new friend for the future.
THE MASTER is at its most electric and searing when Hoffman and Phoenix share the screen, and although they appear together many times throughout the film, there are three key scenes that are the highlights of the movie. The first is that initial processing sequence, in which Dodd rattles off a series of questions (often repeating the same questions four or five times) and Freddie responds in kind. In that brief exchange, we learn more about Freddie than we do anywhere else in the film, both because of what he's saying and the way he shifts nervously in his chair.
Watching Phoenix is this role is one of the greatest experiences I've had observing an actor on screen in many years--his crooked smile; his wavy, slicked-back hair that he constantly runs his hands through; his voice, which alternates between mumbling and screaming; his shifty, violent eyes; and his general air of equal parts charm and menace. But the reason all of these physical cues are the most compelling is that they reveal something broken behind Freddie's eyes.
The second great Hoffman-Phoenix scene takes place in adjacent jail cells, where it becomes clear that Freddie does not like being restrained or caged. The final exchange takes place near the end of the film in Dodd's cavernous office, and it is in that scene that this unlikely pairing has its clear and painful break, and we discover truly if Dodd's processing and exercies have done Freddie any good in the long run.
THE MASTER is Anderson's most impressionistic work, and by that I mean that there's very little by way of a plot. Considering what a masterful storyteller Anderson is, this may be the most divisive issue with audiences. What he has done instead of telling a traditional narrative is given us a series of sequences and images that, when added up at the end, paint portraits of its two leading men. You might think that's what all movies do, but after you see this one, you'll think again.
But THE MASTER isn't only about men. Just from the one secret screening in California recently, the word was out that Amy Adams was the biggest surprise of this film, and that is 100 percent correct. Adams actually plays two roles: the public and private faces of Mary Sue Dodd, who spends much of the film dowdy and pregnant sitting beside her husband nodding in agreement and offering adornment to his already flowery words. But when they are alone, out comes the warrior woman who fears that her husband's small but growing kingdom will tumble before it really takes off. She's as much a part of his success as he is, and if you don't think so, wait for a particularly telling scene in a bathroom. Men are so easy to figure out sometimes.
One of Anderson's constant strengths is his ability to cast smaller supporting roles perfectly, in addition to his leads. THE MASTER is loaded with great work from the likes of Kevin J. O'Connor and Laura Dern but keep your eyes on Jesse Plemons ("Friday Night Lights"; OBSERVE AND REPORT) and Ambyr Childers as Dodd's grown children from a previous marriage. They know more about their father than anyone in this film, and when Plemons says to Freddie that Dodd is "making this up as he goes along," it feels shocking even thought we've been thinking it all along.
I also liked Rami Malek as Childers' new husband. He is so loyal to Dodd and the Cause that we wonder who he thought he was actually marrying on that boat. He's the closest thing we get to blind faith in the movie, and that made it impossible to take my eyes of him.
I don't want to spend too much time talking about the 70mm presentation of THE MASTER I got to experience, because the sad fact is most of you will not see the film projected as such. I do plan on seeing the film again, projected in a more traditional fashion, for comparison's sake. But there is no way to accurately describe the way the several shots of a ship's wake on the clear blue ocean looks in 70mm. There is a depth and richness to it that is simply irreplaceable by any level of digital filming or projection. But I suspect the film's gorgeous cinematography by Mihai Malaimare Jr. (a relative newcomer who worked with Francis Ford Coppola on YOUTH WITHOUT YOUTH, TETRO, and TWIXT), coupled with Jonny Greenwood's hypnotic score, will look pretty stellar in a multiplex as well. Still, if you have the opportunity to see the film in 70mm ever, do so; the results are noticeably different and staggeringly gorgeous.
Here's my advice. Simply watch THE MASTER the first time around. Don't try to decipher or interpret or assign meaning. Just observe the characters as you would any other film. Let their eccentricities amuse you, explosive personalities shock you, and motives become clearer as the film goes on. If you're on the look out for a contortionistic plot, you may leave being wildly disappointed--it just isn't there. Even a subplot involving Freddie's hometown sweetheart that he left behind when he went to war, which I had assumed would teach us a great deal about who he was before the war, has very little to offer beyond an interesting conversation. THE MASTER is Anderson stripped down to the barest of plot, leaving a great deal of room for some of the greatest performances and camerawork he has ever held up for our intake.
I'll leave you with this: Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe a world of possibilities and hidden meanings will be opened up to me as I revisit he film two or three more times. I'd love to be wrong about that. But here's the thing: I don't think that it will change my deep affection for this movie if that is true. I suspect THE MASTER works at every level--as a simple story of two men of different minds, or as a thesis on faith, love, the mind, religion, time, maybe life itself. The most important thing is that Anderson never forgets to keep us guessing and entertained. If a filmmaker can surprise me as to what will happen next and how I'll feel about it, that's more than half the battle. And it's certainly enough for me to recommend seeing it, at least once.
-- Steve Prokopy
"Capone"
capone@aintitcool.com
Follow Me On Twitter

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus-
+ Expand All
-
The experience was great. The crowd was remarkably well-mannered and I agree that the film is very rich and viewers will be rewarded by additional viewings. I can't say enough good things about Joaquin Phoenix's performance. http://www.cinemixtape.com/movie-reviews/the-master/
-
Five years later how does that work? Also he was in the Navy what sort of scars could he have What they ran out of sweet rolls and coffee at the Chow hall?
-
When we first meet Freddie, he's on a ship and the war is literally ending. I said "most" of the film takes place in 1950. And I'm talking about psychological scars, and when you see the movie, your question will seem silly.
-
that this isn't playing near me!
-
Sorry I got Fat fingers.
-
I look at him in these trailers and clips and he just looks like he chewing scenery, like he has something to prove. "Oh, look, I'm back as an actor after trying to play everyone for fools and no one appreciated my genius." Narcissistic ass! That being said, I will likely see it because I am a PTA fan and a fan of Phillip Seymour Hoffman. I'm sure it'll succeed in spite of Phoenix and his bullshit.
-
Was there last night and feel pretty much the same! Only thing was, isn't Freddy's last name Quell in the movie? It says Sutton on IMDB, but I remember it being Quell in the movie.
-
Was the last thing anyone in the Navy in the pacific during WWII was worried about.
-
Its one of the most disgusting, criminal groups in the world.
-
More men died on ships than Marines at the horrific battle of Guadalcanal. I think it was around 4,000 men blown up on decks, drowned below decks, poisoned by toxic gasses in engine room fires, etc. Read history. It's important. There was one battle in WWII in the Pacific where 100 Navy men were eaten by sharks after their ship sank. Bad shit happened even for "sweet roll" eating Navy men.
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 6:45 p.m. CST
yes always a good sign if you have to see a movie three times to maybe like it
by Rupee88
no thanks I'll pass
-
Anderson seems to be abandoning the playfulness of his earlier work in favor of giant serious pieces of art. Normally I'd be all for this but more and more I'm appreciating films about humans that have a genuine warmth for and playfulness with humanity. Even giant pieces of art. I hope Anderson's big abstract works can bring back some of the black comedy of Boogie and Magnolia in the future. They are some of his greatest tools as a storyteller.
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 7:07 p.m. CST
Hoffman was under used in Moneyball. Not only did the story treat the coach as an idiot, who had nothing to do w/ the success of the A
by GQTaste26
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 7:08 p.m. CST
of the A's. Ok, it was Billy's story but come on. He was totally underused. I would have said, he shaved his head just for that?
by GQTaste26
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 7:09 p.m. CST
This is what QT should be doing. You know, evolving as a writer/director? Maybe i give Quention too much credit but he continues to do silly or zany material. This guy is getting it done.
by GQTaste26
PTA is the true master of this group of directors.
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 7:11 p.m. CST
This review does worry me that this will get more mixed reactions than I thought.
by Randy
Sounds like one of those super arthouse films that internet critics love, but a lot of mainstream ones hate and audiences never embrace. You never know, PTA is great, but this sounds like a film that a lot of people will find disappointing.
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 7:21 p.m. CST
Japanese submarine slammed two torpedoes into our side, Chief.
by iampain
...So, eleven hundred men went in the water; 316 men come out and the sharks took the rest, June the 29th, 1945. Anyway, we delivered the bomb. -and the sweet rolls.
-
You are a silly head.
-
when every religion is just as full of shit, just as keen on abusing it's members and just as eager to make money while doing it as the church of scientology.
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 7:37 p.m. CST
I know a lot of people are going to walk out of the latest from writer-director Paul Thomas Anderson and think that they need to see it one or two more times just to get to the film's deeper meanings and the sources of its underlying tension.
by Valenni
And already AICN are defending Paul Thomas Anderson!! Grats!! If it were Paul W.S. Anderson, then they would kill him before seeing the movie!! PTA could shit on harrys face, film it, release it and AICN would herald it a classic!
-
PSH is playing a version of L. Ron Hubbard and 'being processed' is the same as auditing in Scientology with the bullshit E-Meter. Scientology is a vile and bullshit 'religion' just like many others. Please stop mincing words and pretending that this movie is not a blatant indictment of Scientology because it absolutely is and Joaquin's character represents all the poor fuckers sucked into it.
-
what's your point?
-
Still, AICN is on the payroll....
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 7:40 p.m. CST
jamf - and scientology has not committed genocide or engaged in war or slavery or child raping or torture or burning people at the stake
by AntonStark
the people who give scientology shit are usually people who believe in religions that have done the things i listed above Scientology is a con, obviously, but at least it's not an evil con
-
Your right of course, he is talentless (and putting his pecker in Milla, unlike we two) but my point is... AICN have their favorites. Thats all. :-)
-
is when the Indianapolis sank.
-
Lookup Operation Snow White. Then lookup the Sea Org (i.e. Slavery) And the difference between religions and Scientology is that religions don't pump you for information and then blackmail you with it until penniless and then have you spend your life in service to them. There are two types of people... those who aren't Scientologists.. and blooming idiots.
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 7:56 p.m. CST
So in other words, he's ripping off Terrence Malick this time around?...
by Badltnt310
...as opposed to Scorsese (Boogie Nights = Goodfellas with a Raging Bull ending scene) and Altman (Magnolia = Short Cuts) this time? He must have seen 'Tree of Life', loved the film stock and story structure in it, then said to himself, "Time for me to make another original film so that AICN crowd can reconfirm me as the generation's vanguard of cinema."
-
Good Artists Copy; Great Artists Steal -picasso
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 8:24 p.m. CST
If the religion in question was Christianity, then you, Capone, wouldn't be so quick to skirt the issue of it in the film. Afraid someone from Hollyweird will pull your press pass in the future if you mention it?
by Angry Mike
I already know you will deny that, but its obvious the topic is uncomfortable for you.
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 9:02 p.m. CST
Ineresting that its less about Scientology that everyone thought it would be.
by Lovecraftfan
-
to anything released this year? beasts of the southern wild seems like a dark horse...but could rack up some noms. is The Master oscar material? directing, acting, cinematography & or score?
-
Joaquin Phoenix is a lock for a nomination. I'm not sure about Hoffman, though, because he's a co-lead with Phoenix and has the less flashy of the two roles. Cinematography and direction nominations are likely. The screenplay might leave some people cold, though. I disagree with Capone about Adams. She does a fine job, but the role isn't very substantive. Even when she's present in scenes, those scenes are all about Hoffman's character so she doesn't get lots of dialogue. To the poster who lamented a lack of black humor in PTA's most recent work: it's not missing in "The Master."
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 10:51 p.m. CST
More "on the surface" than Boogie Nights? I doubt it
by I_Snake_Plissken
And, I'm not saying that's a bad thing - Boogie Nights is still my favorite film of his (but I still haven't seen There Will be Blood - need to do that).
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 10:52 p.m. CST
First 15 minutes of Punch Drunk Love? The annoying in cinematic history
by I_Snake_Plissken
Not a horrible movie, but a damn annoying start.
-
Aug. 17, 2012, 10:55 p.m. CST
First of all, xiphos_2 can go fuck himself. Crack a fucking history book you fucking retard.
by Ironhelix
Now that I have gotten that out of my way... how exactly is this NOT based on Scientology? Sure looks and sounds an awful lot like it.
-
thx bro, appreciate the opinion/observation.
-
Chewing scenery is solid proof that Phoenix is great actor. He doesn't play himself, he isn't a character actor, he's an actor who loses himself in roles. I get upset at this whole idea that people have that Heath Ledger's The Joker was the best example of method acting ever. Sure, Daniel Day Lewis and Heath Ledger are great actors....but they don't follow method acting. Strasberg never talked about getting that far into a role.
-
P.T. Anderson is the son of Ghoulardi (Ernie Anderson), so therefore, anything he is remotely involved in is golden. Actually, he has proven himself to be among our country's greatest Filmakers, with "Punch Drunk Love" being his only weak spot. That, of course, may have more to do with my inability to watch anything with Adam Sandler in it, though.
-
I think loosely inspired by... I wish it was more bang-on, biodrama. Get Jack Parsons and witchcraft/luciferianism in there. The "soul-cracking", the "commodore messengers" (underage girls in mini-skirts to catch LRH's ashes). Check Sex + Rockets by John Carter, good read, as is the Playboy interview w/ LRH's son. What I've seen on screen seems TAME in comparison.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 1:07 a.m. CST
Dang, talkback a$$wipes, let's challenge PTA to make something cool and scary.
by CodeName
He can make pretentious long-a$$ important films.. but can he make a movie to BEAT the first Kubrick Shining? My money is on... you all own me.
-
I love to go back to Hard Eight, Boogie Nights, and occasionally Magnolia, but nothing later than that really. He's a a hell of a director of actors, there's so much he does right as a director, but he's abandoned interesting narrative for plodding character study and obtuse themes lately. I hate how art directors think offering their comments on the big mysteries of the universe makes their work important. These are the things I'll figure out for myself without the assistance of a movie, thank you very much. And as a true athiest I truly consider any exploration of religious themes as an utter waste of time. The raining frogs were truly the beginning of the end for me and this man's work.
-
will remember him getting his face shit on for an eternity, in fact, i bought the dvd.
-
if you bought the dvd, you should know/listen to the 2 commentaries...Casey Afflecks & then Affleck, Phoenix, & rest of cast. his friend didn't shit on his face...it was all a set-up...ground up coffee & chocolate passed through a tube taped to his friends/assistants back. the whole doc was a farce/faked.
-
He's pretty much the only Brit that did not come from theatre. As far as method I always found that method acting wasn't the greatest way to go about things because the actor that does it seems like he acts in his own little World apart from the rest of the cast and it doesn't feel organic. My preference are more in line with natural acting, you go in there, you say your line and acts the way you could if you would be in your character's place. That's why I prefer the actors from the pre-method generation, Bogart, Peck. Lancaster, etc...Also I think Lewis' acting in There Will Be Blood worked I thought because the movie was almost a biography, the camera was on him throughout and his interaction with other human beings was minimal.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 5:26 a.m. CST
THE MASTER is not a film about scientology or L. Ron Hubbard.
by elsewhere
Could have fooled me.
-
What the fuck is wrong with this site?
-
It is dammit. PTA may try to hide it, and state not, as you do Capone, but it is. Sorry, but dress something as alternate as you like, but the basic facts are there!!
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 7:02 a.m. CST
I really fucking hate it when critics try and tell me how to watch a movie
by David Duchovny
Ebert has some cred and might be able to get away with that shit once in awhile because he's seen like 100,000 movies and knows what he's talking about--but from anyone else it comes off as lecturing douchebaggery.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 8:21 a.m. CST
Now he needs to tackle the whole not even a shrine or candle on side of road to know Jesus existed till 200 years after his death then they made him up thing
by UltraTron
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 8:24 a.m. CST
Hey look everyone I've found an old book with all the answers to life's mysteries. Just put down any new thoughts or theories you don't need those anymore. I have just the thing.
by UltraTron
Just believe.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 9:01 a.m. CST
the press is really going easy on Romney's mormonism, btw
by zom-bot.com
i want to know if our next president (shudder) really wears magic underpants that he thinks will protect him from harm. I guess one of the first things he can cut is the secret service budget.
-
There are plenty of hateful anti-religious bigots/deprogrammers posting here. Get out of the 70's peeps. I am interested in this movie though. And even more interested in why he was motivated to make it. I also like this guys attitude on directing. Very much "do it yourself, screw film school ect.." very independent thinking.
-
Aside from the bad writing, this article screams for proofing and editing.
-
I will have to drive a ways to see this one, but it will be worth it. Wish I could see the 70mm print!
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 11:05 a.m. CST
Does anyone know what song is playing in the full trailer at the end? It's like a song from the 1930's or 40's. Thanks!
by notcher
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 11:33 a.m. CST
Asking Tarantino to evolve and do a serious movie is asking Tarantino to not be Tarantino.
by notcher
QT and PTA are both phenomenal filmmakers in their own ways. If Tarantino all of a sudden made let's say "There Will Be Blood," I'd honestly be disappointed. Tarantino does what he does and that's what makes him so good. Directors have styles, and QT has his, he's on a damn fine role and "Django" will be another one.
-
Capone is a scientologist. That is all.
-
Yeah, just like every other religion in the world.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 12:48 p.m. CST
What did our cells build all that extra space in our brains for? To store infinite carot delusions after they had mistakingly evolved the cerebral cortex
by UltraTron
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 12:49 p.m. CST
or to evolve out conscious byproduct into a preserved state in the fabric of some kind of Higgs field
by UltraTron
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 12:50 p.m. CST
The Ultra Theory of Everything. Coming soon from ain'titcool books
by UltraTron
-
It depends on whether or not you include the one-on-one auditing sessions the audience undergoes during the mid-movie intermission. Auditing? Oops, I meant "processing".
-
...to be about scientology (and other cults).
-
you wrote the following "a former Navy man fresh out of World War II (the film is set mostly in 1950) who has no trouble getting into one mess after another at every turn." To a reasonable reader that would mean 1946 maybe 47 to stretch the point. You wrote something that doesn't make much sense to reasonable person. your reply is logically flawed since you wrote that when we meet Freddy he's on ship and the war is "literally" ending.(what instead of figuratively ending?) So he's STILL in the Navy when we meet him as in serving aboard a ship of the line(guessing here) and not FRESH from the Navy as in discharged, right chief? And for god sake its THE NAVY obviously you never served. life aboard a ship, even in WW2, is sweet simple duty since sailors are simplest minded motherfuckers you will ever meet. Fresh hot food, showers, movies Christ on a crutch it's not like he was saintly USMC Infantrymen having to climb over the bodies of his friends to take out a Jap machine gun nest on some shit hole island in the south pacific, he was IN THE NAVY.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 2:34 p.m. CST
Anyone Who Thinks Scientology Isn't Evil is Willfully Stupid
by Aquatarkusman
They just do it on a micro-level, although they're probably only a decade or so away from pouring money into politics (thanks, Citizens United): See Paul Haggis' expose from a couple of years ago (and he was near a lifetime member). http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/02/14/110214fa_fact_wright
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 3:05 p.m. CST
Ok so apparently you were thinking about bowling when we audited you. Therefore you suffer from inadequacy issues. I'm prescribing the full regimen of bullshit
by UltraTron
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 3:06 p.m. CST
In the bright side it's a fuck load fresher bullshit than your previous religion
by UltraTron
-
Not completely sure it was ww2. It could have been Korea.
-
It sounded to me like they were saying 'Quill'.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 6:07 p.m. CST
I want to know if our next president's (shudder) father was really was a Goat Herder?
by duke of url
Or was he just Frank Marshall Davis, radical poet and journalist who was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party zombot indeed!
-
he didn't earn anything there, it was given to him...
-
This doesn't sound that good! Three barn-burner scenes with 2 amazing actors and an anxiety inducing soundtrack doesn't make a great movie. Honestly, I'd prefer to watch a movie about giant robots fighting each other than another Hoffman vehicle about some Scientology freaks. Or There Will Be Blood, again.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 7:54 p.m. CST
Capone, I don't want to read this review because I want to see this movie fresh— but I gotta know, where/how in the motherfuck did you get to see this in 70mm????
by PotSmokinAlien
-
The Shoshanna segments of Inglourious possess more a authentic pathos and imaginative historical evocation than anything in There Will Be Blood. QT may not trade in a shallow veneer of sobriety and poses of gravitas, but he's as serious about making films of the highest aesthetic quality as anyone on the planet.
-
Considering that you're a birther, I will refrain from mocking you. Special needs individuals need all the help that they can get. I'll just say that while I agree that Obama will be our next President, he is actually our, and that means your, CURRENT PRESIDENT.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 9:44 p.m. CST
[watching Hoffman bring people (including me) under his spell] Such insipid writing from Crapone
by golden tribw
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 10:10 p.m. CST
... there's very little by way of plot - Yeah, PTA's the freakin' genius who can't write an ending to his films
by gruntybear
Just like the massively overrated There Will Be Blood, which, too, was a meandering clusterfuck of dull that just ended, saying absolutely NOTHING.
-
Aug. 18, 2012, 10:48 p.m. CST
Phoenix = no credibility after his hipster fake hip hop meltdown
by smudgewhat
Or whatever that was. I still don't know and I still think it was dumb. Pass.
-
Really? Your concerned about how the masses will receive this film? Well, do yourself a favor and take that concern right off your worry menu. Go see it. If you like it, tell a friend. If you don't, then tell a friend. Don't go out of your way to worry about what the huddled masses might think of the film, if for no other reason than it's not a real concern of yours and you're just concern trolling.
-
I lost all interest. A real life expose of L. Ron would be way more fascinating than this timid abstraction. Weak.
-
somebody earlier posted the Doc was a fake as said in the commentary, i have also heard from numerous sources that was his extensive PR cover-up. If you watch the documentary, he is FUCKED, seriously i knew kids who listen to ICP in high school that were cooler than him, he definitely could not handle his drugs.
-
Aug. 19, 2012, 3:48 a.m. CST
for the record the Jesus Christ mytho's was derived from early pagan Cthulu worship.
by Balkin Flabgurter
Cthulu.
-
Aug. 19, 2012, 9:32 a.m. CST
Freddie's scars run deep, and using a series of questions and exercises (called "being processed"), Dodd wants to reveal the spirits from Freddie's past (past lives is a big part of this religious referred to as "The Cause"), cas them out, and fortify his
by Gabe Athouse
And that's where I stopped reading. If Capone can't be bothered to proof-read, I'm gone.
-
Aug. 19, 2012, 10:27 a.m. CST
gaygoonie- Maybe thats not the movie he wanted to make
by Lovecraftfan
That's pretty unfair demanding something that was maybe never intended in the first place.
-
He showed a cut to Tom Cruise? I'm a bit surprised by that actually. I know they worked together in Magnolia, it's just I thought Scientology would have advised TC against viewing. Perhaps TC is so far along in his training, so clear, that SPs mean nada. Or maybe the movie cost him $$$ in auditing. I must admit that I know nothing first hand from experience regarding Scientology.
-
I have served in the Marines, and you're talking about the Navy of today, not WW2. Clearly you come from a modern mindset that can't conceive of the days when ships sank and drowned hundreds or were bombed to fiery pieces. Visualize being in the middle of the ocean soaked in oil hearing the screams of sailors burning or getting strafed by Jap planes or gradually dying of thirst. Read some history. Sailors could experience horrifying traumas in that conflict. Sure there was a different quality of life, but that's irrelevant, that's not how PTSD works. Soldiers in Iraq had a fine quality of life in their hootches, with internet and skype, but as soon as they left their position and were targeted by insurgents the trauma kicked in. Likewise being in the Navy or Air Force meant that you could definitely get killed in a ship or bomber or be gruesomely wounded in battle no matter what life was like the rest of the time. Plus your notion of what life in the US Navy during WW2 is stuck in the modern world. You think they had access to movies on WW2 era ships? What did they watch them on, a dvd player? Those ships didn't a movie theater on board. All they could do was sit in cramped bunks and smoke and gamble at cards. Much better than being in the jungle, but also just like being on a floating jail.
-
I saw him on Leno, it was definitely tongue-in-cheek imo.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZTmw26RYJU
-
Aug. 19, 2012, 11:19 p.m. CST
Capone really makes me want to move to Chicago sometimes...
by GravyAkira
Man I wish I could have seen The Dark Knight in IMAX down by Navy Pier. Haven't been to that screen since I was a child back in the early 90's. 70mm is amazing! And I would also like to add that Boogie Nights is probably one of the 25 best movies ever produced. PTA's remaining catalog is incredible as well.
-
Aug. 20, 2012, 9:52 a.m. CST
I was really hoping this would be the Citizen Kane of L. Ron Hubbard, but nobody has any balls anymore.
by SergeantStedenko
Especially in Hollywood.
-
Aug. 20, 2012, 9:57 a.m. CST
What I somehow managed to take away from this odd review is that The Master is nota very good movie, but Capone liked it anyway for the performances.
by SergeantStedenko
Please correct me if I'm wrong, Capone, but your muddled faint praise gives Harry's similar half-heaterdness in some of his reviews a run for his money.
-
What I somehow managed to take away from this odd review is that The Master is nota very good movie, but Capone liked it anyway for the performances...
-
There are a lot of people who deserve to be in the conversation here, but my vote for the best character actor around today is PSH. I cannot WAIT to see this film...
-
Aug. 21, 2012, 11:56 a.m. CST
Anderson is close friends with Tom Cruise after Magnolia. He's also shown him the film (The Master).
by openthepodbaydoorshal
Do you think he was going to do an actual slam/expose of Scientology?
-
Aug. 21, 2012, 12:05 p.m. CST
And as much as I love Anderson's work, the big "serious" film I'm looking forward to, beside Lincoln, is Affleck's Argo. Why?
by openthepodbaydoorshal
Not only because its based on a true story, but because of that, John Goodman is cast as John Chambers. That's right. John "Planet Of The Apes" Chambers was involved in a mission to free some of the Iranian hostages. That just blows my mind.
-
Aug. 21, 2012, 1:07 p.m. CST
Respect the cock! Love the cunt! Or something like that I forget. The guy that said he rips everyone off is pretty on the money. Altman, etc
by UltraTron
-
I've not seen Punch Drunk Love, but I have to think that the most annoying opening to a movie ever would be the Director's Cut of "Once Upon a Time in America". I love Sergio, and I love OUATIA, but that phone that keeps ringing through 10-15 minutes of film, through scene after scene, is absolutely crazy-making. It's also very artful and brilliant.
-
Aug. 21, 2012, 5:35 p.m. CST
Does anyone proof read their articles that they post on this site?
by Chris
-
Aug. 22, 2012, 10:22 a.m. CST
We are cells. Cells that have had billions of years to think us up. I say they are a combined consciousness that is our god. They work through whatever means they can to communicate to us the message of spread life. Don't have sex unless it makes more cel
by UltraTron
they may have had time to evolve into the dimensional fabric. Perhaps they found a way to preserve the conscious byproduct produced by the cerebral cortex into a preserved state inside a Higgs or some other undiscovered field. Perhaps the dmt trigger is the final cell signal that empties consciousness into this dimension that is always enveloping us. They hold on to elements inside themselves until needed. They are individual animals. Nobody knows the full extent of their capabilities. Or maybe the vast un-used areas of the brain are for infinite carot delusions that forever trick sentience into continuing it's mindless reproduction of cells' program. Whatever the case it's far more interesting than any bullshit religion could ever touch. It's the Ultra theory. You are living it for real.
-
the release of dmt at the end of your life is all to extend time for a moment that feels like an eternity for the purpose of rewarding the sentience for it's service to cells. The same way sex is your carot reward to keep living and producing more cells. What if heaven is a delusion of the mind that happens in an instant stretched out in the dmt experience. Don't blow your brains out or you might miss the whole point of your cells' program.
-
Aug. 22, 2012, 10:33 a.m. CST
The Ultra Theory of Everything. Coming soon from ain'titcool books. Critics are saying..
by UltraTron
way better than that dianetics bullshit" "Someone should start ultratology!" "I need to get off the toilet before my ass cracks- this book won't let me!
-
Aug. 22, 2012, 1:46 p.m. CST
Actually there is a god in all this. He just has terrible pr people.
by UltraTron
-
Aug. 22, 2012, 1:48 p.m. CST
What do I know? I know I'm a nerd who just got chills and goosebumps on my arms because I accidently thought about bones attempting to charter a ship to find genesis
by UltraTron
-
is definitely felt here. I saw it last night in San Fran and can say that the methods are quite similar to those used in Scientology. HOWEVER, the film neither supports nor eviscerates the "religion". It just observes these two men (animals) in their natural habitat. It's a fascinating piece of work that I believe people will at least come away saying it's not what they thought it would be. There's a lot of humor to be found amongst the crazy. It shares some similarities to TWBB, but this is almost an entirely different beast. The relationship between Dodd and Freddie is more dynamic than that of Plainview and Sunday. Both great in their own right but this one just feels different and a bit more complex. You don't HAVE to see this movie twice to "get it". You'll WANT to see it twice because it's damn good work. Also, it's well worth the extra distance to see it in 70mm. Amazing quality.
-
Because PTA and Maya Rudolph were there, too!
-
Got to meet P. T. but felt pretty bad about it afterward. Maya was super nice and talkative. Movie was excellent.
-
Was he rude?
-
It is a little strange to immediately characterize the real-life alternative to this fictional take as "classless." There's no reason an exposé would be intrinsically classless.
-
Aug. 24, 2012, 10:01 a.m. CST
Anderson's most in-your-face, on-the-surface work" and his"most impressionistic work," with "very little by way of a plot
by ides
The use of impressionism in a film that doesn't lend itself to deeper understanding, especially if there is "very little by way of a plot" worries me. The rest of the review doesn't really get me past this uneasy pairing of observations.
-
It was the way I went about. He was walking back to his seat on the upper floor of the theater and I tried to catch him by saying his name in an unintentionally strong way. It was just nerves. He turned around with this "Oh shit. This is how I die" look. He was nice enough to come over to me. I didn't mean to scare him. I'm sure he gets a lot of crazies. I wanted to ask him about getting on production work but felt weird about the whole thing. But its an incredible movie that does in fact have a plot. Its judt very loose. Its engaging and I think that's what matters most.
-
I noticed someone wrote they like PTAs films up to Magnolia, and then the character studies aren't as enjoyable to them I'm pretty sure that PT Anderson is going to be someone who will grow, but also he knows when to move on. If these movies are obtuse or too artsy, well maybe his 7th movie will be different. Who's to say Sydney, Boogie Nights and Magnolia weren't a bit of a trilogy, followed up with Punch-Drunk Love, There Will Be Blood and The Master? Or maybe his 7th movie will focus on a boy scout who falls in love with a girl on an island where his camp is right before a big storm hits. who's to say?
-
I easily see major acting nominations and even wins for Hoffman, Pheonix, Dern, and Adams but even if PT Anderson gets nominated he'll probably get shafted yet again. Not that that's a bad thing because some of the best directors never earn a win just like Hitchcock and Kubrick.
-
The only competition he might have is Daniel Day. His performance is one that people will remember much like Daniel Day in There Will Be Blood.
-
Pretty impossible to sit through anything after that. Hard Eight is also great.
-
yet. Magnolia, TWBB, The Master, PDL...no signs of slowing down. Just wondering how he will top the Master.
-
At least PTA knows what cinema is. Unlike Peter "take a look at me" Jackson.
-
Completely boring and relatively pointless. Contrary to Capone's assertions - Anderson absolutely forgets to "keep us entertained" or even challenged. I suspect that Capone really hated it too, but he doesn't have emotional honesty to admit to the ACIN crowd.
-
But also weasily pulls his punches just like Capone here - http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captured/review-the-master-features-searing-performances-around-a-hollow-center
-
Yet another weasily review from someone who clearly disliked it, but can't bring himself to clearly say as much. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/58242 Why is everyone afraid to admit that this film sucks ass?
-
what didn't you like about it?
-
philipkschtick: "what didn't you like about it?" No story arc. No character arc. No character changes or development. No narrative surprises. No real insights into the characters or themes it half-heartedly wants to explore. No depth or interesting subtexts are even remotely suggested. In short, it was completely boring. And I don't mean engagingly slow the way that many great films are. I mean BORING, with no compelling elements at all. Every bit as boring as Clint Eastwood's "J. Edgar" or Gus Van Sant's "Last Days". Yes, Phoenix inhabits his character well. And the cinematography and music were good - but all of this in the vain service of a completely directionless plot. The first 30 minutes suggests some interesting dynamics to come - but they never do. If it was trying to be a compelling narrative, it failed. If it was trying to be a compelling character study with minimal narrative - it still failed. The characters are all ridiculously one note, save for a slight and brief shift in one scene where Phoenix inquires about a past sweetheart in his life. If it was trying to be a non-narrative film which operates on the subconscious or emotional level - it still failed. I'm all for a film challenging expectations, as long as the curve-balls being thrown at the audience are interesting or compelling in even the slightest manner. But that is not the case here. It is a contradiction in terms to say that a film "challenges" us by being boring for no reason or larger artistic end. The film is so blatantly hollow that I have to believe that those who praised this film early don't really believe their own utterances deep down inside. They probably had too much of an emotional stake of wanting the film to be great before seeing it, and can't admit to themselves what they experienced first hand. When Phoenix's farting is the most significant action in the film, you know you are in trouble.
-
And... I really don't know if I liked it or not. It was very interesting and I was never bored, but... I'm gonna have to think about it for a while.
Top Talkbacks
- Spoilery early review of MAN OF STEEL!! -- 182 total posts 150 posts
- Holy Crossover!! Magneto’s Boy Quicksilver To Speed About In Whedon’s AVENGERS 2 And Singer’s X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST?? -- 269 total posts 57 posts
- A review of Refn and Gosling's ONLY GOD FORGIVES, direct from Cannes!! -- 68 total posts 49 posts
- Green-Band and Red-Band trailers for the new Jason Sudeikis & Jennifer Aniston VACATION ripoff, WE'RE THE MILLERS are here!! -- 116 total posts 24 posts
- Papa Vinyard thinks that HANGOVER: PART III was a paycheck grab for a buncha people who are already rich!! -- 197 total posts 22 posts
- Harry dives into STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS' spoilers to reveal the truth behind the blockbuster we're seeing! -- 1424 total posts 17 posts
- That rumor about Sony selling SPIDER-MAN? Don't you believe it for a second! -- 444 total posts 16 posts
- Ron Howard's latest trailer sure is a RUSH!!! -- 45 total posts 16 posts
- The METALLICA THROUGH THE NEVER Teaser! -- 200 total posts 15 posts
- Next on the Reboot assemblyline? TIMECOP!! -- 155 total posts 13 posts

