Coaxial

Hercules Has Seen USA's New Miniseries POLITICAL ANIMALS, The Latest From JACK & BOBBY/NO ORDINARY FAMILY Mastermind Greg Berlanti!!

Published at: July 15, 2012, 5:18 a.m. CST by hercules

The latest political drama from Greg Berlanti (“Jack & Bobby,” “Brothers & Sisters,” “No Ordinary Family”), “Political Animals” follows a female U.S. secretary of state (Sigourney Weaver) who was also the the wife of the 42nd president of the United States and once ran for POTUS against the guy who gave her her current job.

But her name is not Hilary Rodham Clinton. Her name is Elaine Barrish Hammond.

Weaver is supported by a host of great actors, including Carlo Gugino (“Karen Sisco”), Ciaran Hinds (“Rome”), and Ellen Burnstyn (“Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore”) -- all struggling under the Berlanti’s lazy, trite, undercooked teleplay.

If you’re expecting “The West Wing,” only written by the longtime showrunner of “Dawson’s Creek” (rather than “West Wing” mastermind Aaron Sorkin, the guy who wrote the excellent political dramedies “An American President” and "Charlie Wilson's War"), you expected right.

The “Political Animals” pilot is abominable. It’s packed solid with wretched dialogue, absurd behavior and predictable plotting. A series sequel to this miniseries could run on USA for decades.

Oh, and don’t watch “Political Animals” while playing a drinking game tied to the word “bitch.” You will die.

The Hollywood Reporter says:

... what Animals is trying to do is take The West Wing and turn it into Dallas. And if you don’t like Dallas, that can be a real letdown.…

Variety says:

... initially more preoccupied with what transpires between the sheets than within the halls of power. As such, the super-sized opener contains promise, but primarily feels like someone's idea of an edgy concept -- not so much wild as the hollow product of a skilled taxidermist. …

HitFix says:

... Because "Political Animals" is still being assembled, I've only seen that first two installments so far. The second one is more interested in family squabbles and other soap operatics than the first one is, and it's possible that this is the direction Berlanti wants to take things in for the rest of the run. But with a cast this good, and with so many potentially juicy conflicts already in play, I'm going to take a more optimistic point of view than Elaine Barrish might.

HuffPost TV says:

... both mildly subversive and very enjoyable …

The New York Times says:

... This half-comic, half-serious soap opera à clef could be awful, but instead it is surprisingly fun …

The Los Angeles Times says:

... more "Dallas" than "The West Wing," a high-class, relatively naturalistic, behind-closed-doors soap opera that plays in fairly obvious yet also fairly affecting ways with the space between public face and private pain and is made highly watchable by an excellent cast that finds the human among the hokum. …

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette says:

... The problem is not the concept, it's the execution. … ignores the sound advice given to all writers: show, don't tell. …

The San Francisco Chronicle says:

... an unsavory and silly miniseries … The basic story line could have been workable, if only it had been handled with thought and creativity. … Berlanti isn't interested in depth. Wanting soap and dirt - a lot of dirt - he has fashioned something that's watchable only if you completely divorce it from the realm of credibility. Real-life politics may be a soap opera, but at least it's better written.

The Washington Post says:

... verges right up to the edge of ludicrous with the right combination of salty-sweet and silly-smart. In just two episodes, it exhibits better writing, stronger acting, cleaner momentum and more confidence than most new shows ever find. If the secretary of state’s dysfunctional family and bizzaro politics become too much to bear, then, happily, it’s over after six episodes. ...

The Boston Herald says:

... boorish … Here’s a series begging to be impeached from prime time. Vote with your remote.

The Boston Globe says:

... flawed but addictive … soaps are almost by definition built on types, right? What distinguishes the good ones are colorful performances, scandalous twists, and the age-old reminder that money and power can’t buy love – all of which “Political Animals” has. …

Time says:

... an inconsistent, sometimes ludicrous, but also juicily fun political soap .…

USA Today says:

... seems designed to call the Clintons to mind. Which would be fine if the pair were as interesting as their real-life counterparts … goes down relatively painlessly but that is nowhere near as sharp or as on-point as it needs to be. …

10 p.m. Sunday. USA.

 

Follow Herc on Twitter!!

Follow Evil Herc on Twitter!!

 

 

 


Blu At Last In Nine Days!!

 


Hundreds of Blu-rays Under $10!!

Readers Talkback

comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • ... From the very promo where they try to cast the Clinton-esque family as American political royalty, I knew this was going to be garbage. The Clintons are not political royalty, same with the Bushes. While I'm fond of former President Clinton and Secretary Clinton, both the Clinton and Bush families are more akin to backwater reality show train wrecks, not royalty. Greg Berlanti seems a capable enough guy, but it's clear he knows next to nothing beyond the surface of this country's political dynamics. He should avoid such complex subject matter.

  • July 15, 2012, 8:52 a.m. CST

    Secretary of State seems like its be tough for tv

    by Bass Ackwards

    Given how much traveling the person in tht position does.

  • July 15, 2012, 11:37 a.m. CST

    Nice slam on USA

    by k88dad

    I did enjoy Monk, though.

  • Watch TV shows and movies made ever since the 2008 Democratic Primaries and try to pick out all the passive-aggressive attempts to acknowledge Clinton. Its Fem-Tastic!

  • July 15, 2012, 5:45 p.m. CST

    No aliens with acid blood? I'll pass.

    by F-18

  • July 16, 2012, 7:23 p.m. CST

    Was left cold by Political Animals...

    by WeylandYutani

    The West Wing was interesting because we saw the fictionalized goings on and political back room deals even if they are purely dramatic and only slightly based on the actual White House West Wing. The romantic stuff was kept to a minimum. Political Animals had too much family silliness... sort of like Dallas in DC. Weaver was good as always, I liked Ciarán Hinds' weird Clintoneque ex president and Ellen Burstyn is always fun. But Adrian Pasdar is a poor choice as POTUS – he just seemed like a kid in the Oval Office set. I will give the mini another try next week, because Carla Gugino is still one of the most amazing looking women to ever walk the Earth. but after that I think I'll take a pass if the series does not hook me.

  • July 16, 2012, 7:43 p.m. CST

    Looks like I'm sticking with Breaking Bad then...

    by Kyle DeMattio

  • July 16, 2012, 8:16 p.m. CST

    Dallas/Political Animals Comparison

    by WeylandYutani

    Looks like I should have read the body of this article before posting... My Dallas comment does not seem nearly as witty after reading the quote from the Hollywood Reporter. Hrumf.

  • July 17, 2012, 9:08 a.m. CST

    "Get away from her, you bitch!" (Drinks, dies)

    by MrMysteryGuest