Nordling Says ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER Gives Bad History But Good Fun!
ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER is a tricky movie to review. It’s almost immune to nitpicks because of the general conceit of the movie. “Hey, wait, Stephen Douglas was never engaged to marry Mary Todd!” “Dude, it’s a movie about Abraham Lincoln hunting vampires.” “Um, Abraham Lincoln’s best friend wasn’t a freed slave.” “Lincoln just axed a vampire that shouldn’t exist.” Sneaky work there, Seth Grahame-Smith.
Unless you live under a rock you likely know the plot by now – Abraham Lincoln (Benjamin Walker), when not studying law, running for President, or fighting the Civil War from the Oval Office, was busy hunting down and killing vampires. Ever since his mother was murdered by one (according to historians she took ill and died, but what do they know), Lincoln’s search for vengeance turned into a noble pursuit to save all living men from the tyranny of the undead. From his early days as a shopkeeper’s assistant and budding law student, to his debates with Stephen Douglas (Alan Tudyk), to his wooing of Mary Todd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), to the Presidency, Lincoln fights the unholy minions of Adam (Rufus Sewell), with the help of mysterious Henry Sturgess (Dominic Cooper), his shopkeeper partner Joshua Speed (Jimmi Simpson) and freed slave and best friend Will Johnson (Anthony Mackie).
Is the concept inherently silly? Of course it is. It’s also pretty damn fun. I’ve read critics baring their claws for this one, even before its release, and the movie doesn’t deserve that kind of prejudging. ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER is light and frothy, and while it’s not weighty that’s not to say it’s not entertaining. Timur Bekmambetov never met a slo-mo shot that he didn’t adore, and some of the action scenes, for me, almost approach incoherency, but there’s an undeniable charm to the movie that overcomes that. It’s fun to piece together this alternate history, even knowing how incredibly wrong it is, and Simon Kinberg and Seth Grahame-Smith’s screenplay (based on his book) deviates enough from the source material so that readers will still be surprised. There’s a fantastic set piece, involving a train, some silver, President Lincoln and a bunch of vampires that should have been in the book, in my opinion. People expecting the serious nature of the book (for its inherent retconning of history) will probably be disappointed.
There’s also the matter of Will Johnson, played by Anthony Mackie, a character also not in the original book. In the movie he and Lincoln are old friends; Will was a young slave as a boy and Abraham’s father interceded in his whipping (at one point, the 3D kicks in to what has to be the strangest use for it so far, as the slaver’s whip comes flying at the screen. If only the makers of FAREWELL UNCLE TOM had use of this technology, imagine the horrific results). Once he is freed later in life, Will and Abe become close friends, and though it may be difficult to accept this plot point considering the times, again, it’s about Abraham Lincoln fighting vampires, so minor plot contrivances like that go straight out the window.
It also helps that the movie is well acted for it being what it is. Benjamin Walker has a definite screen presence and comparisons to Liam Neeson aren’t far off the mark (in point of fact, Walker played young Liam Neeson in one of my favorite films of his, KINSEY). But he takes the movie seriously and never lets the audience know that he’s in on the joke. Same goes for Mary Elizabeth Winstead, and Anthony Mackie, who make their performances work through sheer charm and force of will. Dominic Cooper as Henry also brings his own charisma to the movie, and Rufus Sewell hams it up the best way he can as Adam, the head vampire pulling the strings to insure that the undead will have a nation of their own.
However, Timur Bekmambetov constantly undercuts the movie, with so much speed ramping I think the movie would run half the time at regular speed. Aside from the aforementioned 3D whip, he shoots like the mad Russian he is, testing the limits of trigonometry and good taste. There’s an awful lot of jumping, kicking, axing, shooting, and general chaos in the movie, more so than ever was in the book, which does read like an alternative history. I’m curious what this movie would have been like under a more sedate director, but Bekmambetov shoots the hell out of this thing regardless, even when the action is so cartoony as to mock all laws of physics and geography.
It must also be said, sadly, that due to the prevalence of night scenes, the 3D, at least for me, was ineffective; at times the dimming of the screen made it difficult to determine what was going on and Caleb Deschanel tries hard but the frenetic editing and the speed ramping make many of the action scenes too disjointed. It’s a shame because the action choreography is quite good – one sequence in a plantation where Lincoln takes on a cadre of vamps is well staged but really difficult to keep up with.
I guarantee that reviewers are sharpening their knives for this one, and that’s too bad – I hate to use the phrase “Lighten up, it’s a movie” because it sounds reductive, but I think it’s appropriate in this case. Bekmambetov throws everything he can at the material, and the result is at times frustrating, but it’s never dull. There will be a few giggles at some of the clunky dialogue and set pieces but it’s still enjoyable for all that. It’s not a turn-your-brain-off kind of movie – much of the humor is predicated on knowing something of Abraham Lincoln’s life – but it’s entertaining enough and the actors, especially the terrific Benjamin Walker, are having a good time without overplaying their hand. The final shot alone, for me, makes ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER worth the price of admission; it may irritate some people on the right side of the political spectrum, but it’s all in good fun, if you don’t take it (or the movie) too seriously.
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
+ Expand All
June 21, 2012, 6:09 p.m. CST
You guys have fun.
June 21, 2012, 6:13 p.m. CST
June 21, 2012, 6:24 p.m. CST
by Nasty In The Pasty
June 21, 2012, 6:24 p.m. CST
June 21, 2012, 6:31 p.m. CST
Because that one was surprisingly good, all things considered.
June 21, 2012, 6:53 p.m. CST
I saw that in the red Box today, Who in the unhly hell flits the BILL on all the B Movie rip-offs? regardless, It doesn't look like a bad movie and this review seems decent enough... So going to see it...
June 21, 2012, 6:54 p.m. CST
Yeah, Lincoln vs. vampires is a silly concept but, once you get past that, where's the rest of the gag? Or is the gag just "Hey! Look! Lincoln fucked up a vampire!" and that's it?
June 21, 2012, 7:09 p.m. CST
by shane peterson
June 21, 2012, 7:29 p.m. CST
Damn it, a non-awful review from Nordling. I am starting to not hate that guy as much as I did.
June 21, 2012, 8:15 p.m. CST
He ultimately wanted all blacks sent back to Africa. Several actually were sent, hence Liberia. They would call that ethnic cleansing today.
June 21, 2012, 8:36 p.m. CST
We need more Nordling and the like here. Unlike some reviewers on here (I refuse to call them critics) Nordling can write.
June 21, 2012, 8:47 p.m. CST
by Elwood Blues
That is all.
June 21, 2012, 9:23 p.m. CST
by Queefer Sutherland
I bet George McClellan is a shape shifter!
June 21, 2012, 9:28 p.m. CST
by Emerald Snoggingbottom
June 21, 2012, 9:31 p.m. CST
by Andrew Coleman
They hate on silly movies like this one. But then defend really shit films like Transformers or some other nonsense... But then go on to hate other solid geek films like John Carter... So let me guess if ALVH does well in the BO it suddenly won't be shitty anymore?
June 21, 2012, 9:37 p.m. CST
It sure would get the kiddies to read more history books, that is for sure.
June 21, 2012, 11:12 p.m. CST
Yeah, it can be depressing if you care a little, too. I don't get it either. I had a blast at John Carter. It wasn't perfect, but it was fun. And it looked amazing, even for a conversion. And somehow they know, without seeing it, that it DOES (not will, does) suck. Oh well.
June 22, 2012, 9:07 a.m. CST
June 22, 2012, 11:08 a.m. CST
by Lummox JR
I don't know, tikidonkeypunch. The Kidd's reviews have held up pretty well for me for the movies I've seen. Besides, Nordling actually had good things to say about the Alien Movie That Shall Remain Unnamed, and therefore can no longer be trusted to crap out a worthy review. I'd like a second opinion for sure, but Nordling's doesn't count.
June 22, 2012, 12:27 p.m. CST
And I liked Wanted. And no mention that the guy who shot The Black Stallion, The Right Stuff, The Natural, and other beauts did the cinematography? Hmmmmm.
June 22, 2012, 1:09 p.m. CST
I've read the book--it was a lot of fun. I'm sure critics loathe the book and the very concept of Lincoln being a vampire hunter.
June 22, 2012, 2:44 p.m. CST
by Joe Damiani
unless he planned on killing them all, then no it doesn't count as ethnic cleansing. And point in fact, he didn't care about slavery one way or another. If freeing the slaves preserved the Union, great. If keeping them as slaves did the same, he was fine with that too.
- Beginning of a flood of AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON Comic Con Artwork?!?! -- 135 total posts 52 posts
- There's a new awesome filming location for STAR WARS 7!!! -- 46 total posts 46 posts
- Marvel Debuts Special ANT-MAN Poster For Comic Con! -- 81 total posts 39 posts
- The Bat Cowl from BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE is in the hall! -- 38 total posts 38 posts
- Behold The Blazing New Poster For THE HOBBIT: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES!! -- 190 total posts 26 posts
- SDCC '14: Title logo for WARCRAFT! -- 35 total posts 25 posts
- Sony Says Fuck It, Announces Release Dates For THE SINISTER SIX And THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 3! -- 317 total posts 22 posts
- Marvel sets one additional 2018 release date! -- 79 total posts 18 posts
- EXPENDABLES 3 launches a ton of Comic Con posters! -- 77 total posts 16 posts
- From The Wasteland Emerges A MAD MAX: FURY ROAD Teaser Poster! -- 189 total posts 14 posts