Cool News
Nordling Says ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER Gives Bad History But Good Fun!

Nordling here.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER is a tricky movie to review. It’s almost immune to nitpicks because of the general conceit of the movie. “Hey, wait, Stephen Douglas was never engaged to marry Mary Todd!” “Dude, it’s a movie about Abraham Lincoln hunting vampires.” “Um, Abraham Lincoln’s best friend wasn’t a freed slave.” “Lincoln just axed a vampire that shouldn’t exist.” Sneaky work there, Seth Grahame-Smith.
Unless you live under a rock you likely know the plot by now – Abraham Lincoln (Benjamin Walker), when not studying law, running for President, or fighting the Civil War from the Oval Office, was busy hunting down and killing vampires. Ever since his mother was murdered by one (according to historians she took ill and died, but what do they know), Lincoln’s search for vengeance turned into a noble pursuit to save all living men from the tyranny of the undead. From his early days as a shopkeeper’s assistant and budding law student, to his debates with Stephen Douglas (Alan Tudyk), to his wooing of Mary Todd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), to the Presidency, Lincoln fights the unholy minions of Adam (Rufus Sewell), with the help of mysterious Henry Sturgess (Dominic Cooper), his shopkeeper partner Joshua Speed (Jimmi Simpson) and freed slave and best friend Will Johnson (Anthony Mackie).
Is the concept inherently silly? Of course it is. It’s also pretty damn fun. I’ve read critics baring their claws for this one, even before its release, and the movie doesn’t deserve that kind of prejudging. ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER is light and frothy, and while it’s not weighty that’s not to say it’s not entertaining. Timur Bekmambetov never met a slo-mo shot that he didn’t adore, and some of the action scenes, for me, almost approach incoherency, but there’s an undeniable charm to the movie that overcomes that. It’s fun to piece together this alternate history, even knowing how incredibly wrong it is, and Simon Kinberg and Seth Grahame-Smith’s screenplay (based on his book) deviates enough from the source material so that readers will still be surprised. There’s a fantastic set piece, involving a train, some silver, President Lincoln and a bunch of vampires that should have been in the book, in my opinion. People expecting the serious nature of the book (for its inherent retconning of history) will probably be disappointed.
There’s also the matter of Will Johnson, played by Anthony Mackie, a character also not in the original book. In the movie he and Lincoln are old friends; Will was a young slave as a boy and Abraham’s father interceded in his whipping (at one point, the 3D kicks in to what has to be the strangest use for it so far, as the slaver’s whip comes flying at the screen. If only the makers of FAREWELL UNCLE TOM had use of this technology, imagine the horrific results). Once he is freed later in life, Will and Abe become close friends, and though it may be difficult to accept this plot point considering the times, again, it’s about Abraham Lincoln fighting vampires, so minor plot contrivances like that go straight out the window.
It also helps that the movie is well acted for it being what it is. Benjamin Walker has a definite screen presence and comparisons to Liam Neeson aren’t far off the mark (in point of fact, Walker played young Liam Neeson in one of my favorite films of his, KINSEY). But he takes the movie seriously and never lets the audience know that he’s in on the joke. Same goes for Mary Elizabeth Winstead, and Anthony Mackie, who make their performances work through sheer charm and force of will. Dominic Cooper as Henry also brings his own charisma to the movie, and Rufus Sewell hams it up the best way he can as Adam, the head vampire pulling the strings to insure that the undead will have a nation of their own.
However, Timur Bekmambetov constantly undercuts the movie, with so much speed ramping I think the movie would run half the time at regular speed. Aside from the aforementioned 3D whip, he shoots like the mad Russian he is, testing the limits of trigonometry and good taste. There’s an awful lot of jumping, kicking, axing, shooting, and general chaos in the movie, more so than ever was in the book, which does read like an alternative history. I’m curious what this movie would have been like under a more sedate director, but Bekmambetov shoots the hell out of this thing regardless, even when the action is so cartoony as to mock all laws of physics and geography.
It must also be said, sadly, that due to the prevalence of night scenes, the 3D, at least for me, was ineffective; at times the dimming of the screen made it difficult to determine what was going on and Caleb Deschanel tries hard but the frenetic editing and the speed ramping make many of the action scenes too disjointed. It’s a shame because the action choreography is quite good – one sequence in a plantation where Lincoln takes on a cadre of vamps is well staged but really difficult to keep up with.
I guarantee that reviewers are sharpening their knives for this one, and that’s too bad – I hate to use the phrase “Lighten up, it’s a movie” because it sounds reductive, but I think it’s appropriate in this case. Bekmambetov throws everything he can at the material, and the result is at times frustrating, but it’s never dull. There will be a few giggles at some of the clunky dialogue and set pieces but it’s still enjoyable for all that. It’s not a turn-your-brain-off kind of movie – much of the humor is predicated on knowing something of Abraham Lincoln’s life – but it’s entertaining enough and the actors, especially the terrific Benjamin Walker, are having a good time without overplaying their hand. The final shot alone, for me, makes ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER worth the price of admission; it may irritate some people on the right side of the political spectrum, but it’s all in good fun, if you don’t take it (or the movie) too seriously.
Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus-
+ Expand All
-
You guys have fun.
-
June 21, 2012, 6:31 p.m. CST
But how does it compare to Abaham Lincoln vs Zombies?
by DickBallsworth
Because that one was surprisingly good, all things considered.
-
I saw that in the red Box today, Who in the unhly hell flits the BILL on all the B Movie rip-offs? regardless, It doesn't look like a bad movie and this review seems decent enough... So going to see it...
-
June 21, 2012, 6:54 p.m. CST
All the ads look so very serious, I don't want this movie to be serious
by Tall_Boy6t6
Yeah, Lincoln vs. vampires is a silly concept but, once you get past that, where's the rest of the gag? Or is the gag just "Hey! Look! Lincoln fucked up a vampire!" and that's it?
-
Damn it, a non-awful review from Nordling. I am starting to not hate that guy as much as I did.
-
He ultimately wanted all blacks sent back to Africa. Several actually were sent, hence Liberia. They would call that ethnic cleansing today.
-
June 21, 2012, 8:36 p.m. CST
We need more Nordling and the like here. Unlike some reviewers on here (I refuse to call them critics) Nordling can write.
by P
-
That is all.
-
June 21, 2012, 9:23 p.m. CST
Is John Wilkes Booth a succubus? Is U.S. Grant a werewolf? Is Mary Todd a fairy?
by Queefer Sutherland
I bet George McClellan is a shape shifter!
-
They hate on silly movies like this one. But then defend really shit films like Transformers or some other nonsense... But then go on to hate other solid geek films like John Carter... So let me guess if ALVH does well in the BO it suddenly won't be shitty anymore?
-
It sure would get the kiddies to read more history books, that is for sure.
-
Yeah, it can be depressing if you care a little, too. I don't get it either. I had a blast at John Carter. It wasn't perfect, but it was fun. And it looked amazing, even for a conversion. And somehow they know, without seeing it, that it DOES (not will, does) suck. Oh well.
-
I don't know, tikidonkeypunch. The Kidd's reviews have held up pretty well for me for the movies I've seen. Besides, Nordling actually had good things to say about the Alien Movie That Shall Remain Unnamed, and therefore can no longer be trusted to crap out a worthy review. I'd like a second opinion for sure, but Nordling's doesn't count.
-
June 22, 2012, 12:27 p.m. CST
"some of the action scenes, for me, almost approach incoherency"...gives me reason to pause.
by openthepodbaydoorshal
And I liked Wanted. And no mention that the guy who shot The Black Stallion, The Right Stuff, The Natural, and other beauts did the cinematography? Hmmmmm.
-
June 22, 2012, 1:09 p.m. CST
I've read the book--it was a lot of fun. I'm sure critics loathe the book and the very concept of Lincoln being a vampire hunter.
by bat725
Lighten up.
-
unless he planned on killing them all, then no it doesn't count as ethnic cleansing. And point in fact, he didn't care about slavery one way or another. If freeing the slaves preserved the Union, great. If keeping them as slaves did the same, he was fine with that too.
Top Talkbacks
- JAMES GANDOLFINI 1961-2013 -- 208 total posts 55 posts
- Ages And Genders!! Casting Breakdown For Seven Characters Headed For J.J. Abrams’ STAR WARS: EPISODE VII?? -- 309 total posts 48 posts
- Mary Jane Watson is NOT going to be a part of THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2! -- 290 total posts 28 posts
- A New KICK-ASS 2 International Poster!! -- 67 total posts 15 posts
- Father Geek says MAN OF STEEL is pretty much the best Superhero Movie ever made and I'm not gonna argue! -- 1925 total posts 14 posts
- A Few Nice "Making Of' Pics From THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2!! -- 142 total posts 12 posts
- Sweet knights of Colombus!! A new trailer for ANCHORMAN 2: THE LEGEND CONTINUES has been unleashed!! -- 147 total posts 11 posts
- David S. Goyer And Mr. Beaks Talk MAN OF STEEL Spoilers! DA VINCI'S DEMONS,100 BULLETS And JUSTICE LEAGUE Also Discussed! -- 596 total posts 11 posts
- NOWHERE BOY director Sam Taylor-Johnson signs on to 50 SHADES OF GREY!! -- 56 total posts 10 posts
- ‘It’s The Least Of Your Problems!!’ Hercules Has Seen Tonight’s Big HANNIBAL Finale!! -- 10 total posts 10 posts

