Movie News

The New MAGIC MIKE One Sheet Is Working It For Someone!!

Published at: June 4, 2012, 12:46 a.m. CST

The Kidd here...

Hey, Paramount... guess what? Warner Bros. figured out how to do a movie with more Channing Tatum, and they didn't even have to postpone it nine months to do so. They took a chance and built a film around him, and I'm guessing it'll work out in their favor, since there's definitely an audience out there dying to get their hands on a movie about male strippers. 

MAGIC MIKE hits theatres on June 29, and I'm sure I just made someone's day posting this new poster for the film, directed by Steven Soderbergh. It may look like COCKTAIL with half-naked dudes... but someone's going to appreciate it. 

 

-Billy Donnelly

"The Infamous Billy The Kidd"

BillyTheKidd@aintitcool.com

Follow me on Twitter.

Readers Talkback

comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • June 4, 2012, 12:48 a.m. CST

    women don't come to this site

    by Nuts

  • June 4, 2012, 12:50 a.m. CST

    Like 300 without the battles

    by The_Goddamn_Batman

    And Avengers without the aliens.

  • June 4, 2012, 12:54 a.m. CST

    Just glad it's not 3D

    by beetlegeuse

  • June 4, 2012, 1:11 a.m. CST

    i...i have to see this

    by HASBEER_WILLCHEET

    im buying my ticket right now

  • June 4, 2012, 1:32 a.m. CST

    'Showgirls' for chicks?

    by Tarijeno

    That's what it's looking like.

  • ...its got Tatum,just needs more cowbell.

  • June 4, 2012, 1:40 a.m. CST

    I'm sorry, I thought you just said Steven Soderburgh had directed this?

    by cactusjack1972

    You DID? oh.

  • June 4, 2012, 1:48 a.m. CST

    As a completely heterosexual male

    by Riley Harrison

    I'm comfortable saying this movie actually looks pretty good. I trust Soderbergh enough to tolerate some dancing dudes in exchange for a well done movie.

  • June 4, 2012, 2:27 a.m. CST

    Waitaminute

    by ISeeAllWrong

    I get banned for describing the Magic Mike poster as "gay"? By a man that labelled Will Smith a loud, obnoxious black man?

  • June 4, 2012, 2:30 a.m. CST

    I think it's fair to say...

    by ISeeAllWrong

    ...that Magic Mike intends on drawing a gay male demographic. I don't recall pigeonholing that same audience with any other stereotypical adjectives... "Kidd".

  • June 4, 2012, 5:08 a.m. CST

    Re: women don't come to this site

    by DrkAngl001

    Really!? I've been coming to this site for YEARS - probably longer than you! The poster is okay, no great shakes. Women and their friends will go see it under the pretense of a joke - especially those who wouldn't feel comfortable going to a male revue. They'll get to see what happens without feeling uncomfortable, and nobody will see you blushing in a dark theatre. Some will go to see Joe M because he was in True Blood. They will not bring their boyfriends to see this movie. How well this movie will do is completely dependent upon how well they advertise it.

  • June 4, 2012, 5:43 a.m. CST

    Great... another film full of facehugging and chestbursting.

    by Inexplicable_Nuclear_Balls

    Oh, you mean it's not an Alien prequel? In that case I'd rather not know what kind of DNA will be involved.

  • June 4, 2012, 6:10 a.m. CST

    How did they convince McConoughey to take his shirt off?

    by Mugato5150

    must have gotten him drunk or something.

  • June 4, 2012, 7:23 a.m. CST

    Drkrang, you only THINK you're a woman.

    by cookylamoo

    That doesn't count.

  • ...and it really doesn't look that bad. Plus Big Sexy Kevin Nash?! FTW!

  • June 4, 2012, 8:06 a.m. CST

    I jerked off to this...

    by Cruzboy

    ...in a completely hetero way.

  • June 4, 2012, 8:50 a.m. CST

    Work it all night up in that ass ya butt darts!

    by UltraTron

  • It's fabulous.

  • June 4, 2012, 9 a.m. CST

    Anything Soderbergh makes, I'll see...

    by Nasty In The Pasty

    ...although that Liberace thing will be stretching it.

  • June 4, 2012, 9:32 a.m. CST

    As a completely gay male

    by Arguendo

    I am comfortable saying this movie looks pretty bad. [First] It seems like a movie that is pandering to some imaginary target audience that doesn't exist. As a *male*, I would much prefer my unnecessary shirtlessness in the form of an action movie (e.g., Thor -- which I thought was decent, but not great, though the visuals much improved by Hemsworth and acting by Hiddleston). But a cheesy romance? Not even a romantic comedy, mind you, which at the very least involves some comedy... but a romance? Don't get me wrong -- I'm all for attractive male actors taking their shirts off for no good reason, but there's easily a dozen more interesting ways to get there. Meanwhile, I would guess that many females, while okay with the straight romance genre might be less okay with the "for no good reason" aspect of this movie. I get it -- it's a "hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold" trope with a male. Still dull as a brick. [Second] Isn't Cocktail some movie about Tom Cruise being a bartender? I don't see the connection. [Third] This poster is definitely redonkulous. If I'm generous, I'm saying that they're going for some "self-effacing" vegas-style cheese. But that would be an insult to the posters that they make in Vegas. I see some comparisons to Showgirls, but the Showgirls poster was much more stylistic, if still kinda dull (I suppose the heterosexuals can chime in if I'm incorrect). Yes, these blokes aren't wearing shirts, but nothing about the poster really makes them seem "sexy." Tatum looks much more attractive in the "Step Up" poster than in this poster, even with his shirt on. In both of those other movies, the characters look like they're going to *do something*. There's an implied intent. Looking at this poster, it looks like they just stand around like posable figures that just, you know, stand around. Finally, I know that he's not wearing the outfit professionally (just "professionally"), but seriously, who wears a necktie and a bowtie at the same time. Not to mention that the bowtie is way too large and makes him look like a cartoon. [Finally] I have no reason why I wrote so much about this poster. I suppose I'm a bit insulted that some people might attribute this awful-looking film as appealing (universally) to gay men (I realize that only 2 or 3 talk-backers so far have though... so thanks for exceeding expectations). [Post script] I acknowledge that I don't speak for all gay men.

  • June 4, 2012, 9:37 a.m. CST

    If you're not excited about this movie…

    by Capone

    …well, that's probably the fault of the trailer. But if you've been paying any attention to interviews with Channing Tatum in the last few months (especially when he was doing press for 21 JUMP STREET), he's made it very clear they were going for a SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER vibe (and he wasn't talking about the dancing), which means this film gets very dark at times. I've heard details of some of these moments, and he isn't lying. Very much looking forward to MAGIC MIKE.

  • June 4, 2012, 9:57 a.m. CST

    ... taking a step back ...

    by Arguendo

    ... given Capone's comment, I'll take a step back and try not to pre-judge the movie... I really haven't been following it at all (except for watching the one trailer). All that said, I don't think anything of what Capone mentioned is even implied by the poster, so I do stand by my one statement. This poster is not good. I can't think of a great example off the top of my head, but if you want dark (and "aesthetically" appealing) you can take something like the Solaris poster (if we stick with Soderbergh) or, hell, even the Showgirls poster (a movie, btw, that could be described as "going very dark," if failing on accounts to actually *feel* anything but campy). If the trailer or the poster had implied any of that, I would be much more inclined to see the movie. But something's not translating. Maybe I'm just not that perceptive. I know AICN contributers may differ on their tastes. However, rather than just a non-committal commentary on the poster ("someone's going to appreciate it"), it would be great if the main text acknowledges that the poster (and trailers?) are pretty misleading (if not plain bad) and that there is a movie underneath it all.

  • June 4, 2012, 11:11 a.m. CST

    Its a bit of an uncomfortable experience for me

    by eloy

    I usually dont give a flying fuck about people's reactions towards or perceptions about me, but Im getting to a point where I find it a bit uncomfortable going to these sort of movies that -at least from a first, superficial glance- are not targeted to me. Thing is, I try, within the realms of the possible and always keeping a personal priority list in mind, to keep up with all sorts of cinema coming my way (Hollywood, mostlyI) so everytime I go in to check something like The Lizzie Maguire Movie, Aquamarine or, soon, Magic Mike, I get these glances from the soccer moms in the audience like I'm a pedo or from the douches escorting their girlfriends like I'm gay, they're the KKK and we're still in 60's Alabama. Fuck em all

  • I kid, I kid. As a lazy couch potato, I'm looking forward to this movie getting my wife out of the house for an evening while I kill zombies on Xbox.

  • June 4, 2012, 12:59 p.m. CST

    I bet this set reeked of B.O. 24/7, 52/365.

    by Behemoth

    B.O. and improperly wiped ass. In fact, I'm getting the same scent from my computer screen right now. Oh, wait, my bad. Just shat myself.

  • June 4, 2012, 1:42 p.m. CST

    Haven't seen the previews but I can already tell it needs more Tatum.

    by Tikidonkeypunch

  • June 4, 2012, 5:02 p.m. CST

    They kinda look like the Village People.

    by adeceasedfan

Top Talkbacks