June 1, 2012, 1:55 a.m. CST
June 1, 2012, 1:56 a.m. CST
June 1, 2012, 2:04 a.m. CST
by Andrew Coleman
Nothing is wrong with that. It's why I'm seeing it.
June 1, 2012, 2:06 a.m. CST
June 1, 2012, 2:12 a.m. CST
June 1, 2012, 2:15 a.m. CST
I was wondering, do you think they cast her solely for ticket sales or because she's a cute, young, known actress? Or both? Or neither? I also think she's a good actress outside of the Twilight films. But it is hard to think of her as a sword wielding warrior. Maybe a few more of these types of roles will help combat this.
June 1, 2012, 2:26 a.m. CST
"...Finn decides to molest Snow White a little." >_<
June 1, 2012, 2:29 a.m. CST
or at least not with anywhere near the budget
June 1, 2012, 2:40 a.m. CST
by Bass Ackwards
Wow that is a really fantastic (and fucked up) idea that totally makes sense in this world, the kind that makes you wonder how no one ever thought it up before (unless someone had).
June 1, 2012, 3:20 a.m. CST
by Fa Fa Fooey
Loves me some Charlize...
June 1, 2012, 3:25 a.m. CST
Guess you won't be seeing The Hobbit then?
June 1, 2012, 3:27 a.m. CST
I have to say I had very low expectations when going into this film. As most of you will agree with me, Kristin Stewart has about two facial expressions she uses throughout any given time in the entire movie. The way she expresses joy, love, happiness, and even shedding a tear in one scene all are just about the same look. Now there was one scene in the film which I enjoyed where Thor was fighting a big ugly Troll underneath a Troll-bridge. This scene looked very much like anything out of Lord of the Rings in terms of quality. CGI has become so commonplace now that it is to be expected to look great. However I think the Director should have used some of his CGI budget and enhanced Kristin Stewarts facial expressions like what was done to Jim Carrey in The Grinch. Now as I said above Thor fights a Troll and gets his but whooped. The Troll gets defeated because Kristin Stewart walks up to it and gives it her famous expressionless stare. I know I would run away in the same manner if I was being stared at by her. So in that sense the movie had some realism thrown in. I do have to say I was pretty tired after a long day of work when I went to go see this movie, so I had trouble at certain points staying awake as it gets pretty slow and drawn out between action scenes. I give it a 7 out of 10.
June 1, 2012, 4:34 a.m. CST
...is Kristen Stewart fairer than Charlize Theron?
June 1, 2012, 4:49 a.m. CST
I'd still like to see this in a theater for the visuals = matinee fare.
June 1, 2012, 5:48 a.m. CST
Kristen The One Note Basilisk Stewert fairer than Charlize Theron!?! My Irish arse is she!!!!
June 1, 2012, 5:59 a.m. CST
He could probably play all 7 as wholly unique characters.
June 1, 2012, 5:59 a.m. CST
I ound it laughable that 2 guys(from Twilight) was fighting over her and willing to die for her. She aint ugly but there no way is she gorgeous, hot, pretty, or whatever. And to make her Snow White?! Get the fuck outta here. Guess this is the first time I'm rooting for the evil queen!
June 1, 2012, 7:19 a.m. CST
There's 'suspension of disbelief', and then there's 'give me a fucking break!'.
June 1, 2012, 7:46 a.m. CST
Oh, yeah..saw this last night. Skip any scene without Charlize in it. Trust me.
June 1, 2012, 8:45 a.m. CST
by Stereotypical Evil Archer
Stewart should only play stoners.
June 1, 2012, 8:54 a.m. CST
June 1, 2012, 9:04 a.m. CST
...because Charlize makes K. Stew look like a little boy.
June 1, 2012, 11 a.m. CST
I'm tired of having characters like Elizabeth Swann, who, in spite of having no training that we know of suddenly know how to fight with swords and captain a ship full of brigands. If the Wizard of Oz was filmed today, I guarantee you Dorothy would wind up in a fight against the Wicked Witch's guards, dispatching several at a time with a spectacularly choreographed sweep of her lance. She'd slay at least one of them as he ran at her from behind, without having to even look at him. She would in fact look pointedly away from him just to prove her badassness. The poster with Snow White holding a daggar and wearing pants makes me think "Where's Snow White? Is that the 'huntsman'?" Not that I'm a chauvinist, mind you. I just want the classical fairy tale formula. I want a female lead like Lily in Legend.
June 1, 2012, 11:21 a.m. CST
I thought the same thing about Keira Knightly in that. King Arthur movie.
June 1, 2012, 11:39 a.m. CST
by Admiral Nelson
Posting this again, because I simply can't get over how jaw-droppingly ignorant his review was. "Fair" means "fair complexion, not "equitable" (why the hell would an evil queen give a rat's ass about "equity?") Changing the definition of words just to fit Harry's own lack of education is just ignorant -- a dog doesn't magically become a cat just because I call it one. At the time this story was written, "light-skinned" was synonymous with "beautiful" and "pleasing to look at." Even today, people in India or China often equate light-colored skin with being more beautiful -- the darker your skin, the lower your status, because it means you have to work in the sun. It's both class and race mixed in one ugly, bigoted package.
June 1, 2012, 11:59 a.m. CST
Perfect example. I'd forgotten about that movie - haven't even seen it. Should I spend my time on it?
June 1, 2012, 1:30 p.m. CST
by Cheif Brody
Christ...Rule 1 of ANY Snow White film...Snow has to be as hot, if not HOTTER than the goddamned Queen! <p> I can think of 20 actresses hotter & more talented (with more facial expressions) than this girl who is only getting hired because she lucked out and landed that Twilight gig. <p> Studios will soon learn...the only reason the Twilight movies are so popular AIN'T because of Kristin...It's the emo vampire and the were wolf gym rat that are putting millions of 14 year old girls in those theater seats. <p> Stewart's just their (wooden, vapid) stand in for their 2 hour fantasy wish fullfillment experience.
June 1, 2012, 1:48 p.m. CST
by Admiral Nelson
You nailed it completely. Stewart is simply a blank slate which the tween girls can draw themselves on. Perfect summation.
June 1, 2012, 2:18 p.m. CST
and Im not even gonna mention twilight. but she fucking sucked in adventureland. many people here said she did good... so playing a cunt makes you a good character? maybe it was the way her character was written, but she sucked. insufferable cunt. plus, all the "acting" she did was basically a joey potter/katie holmes ripoff from dawsons creek. seriously, she did the hair behind the ear thing more than mrs cruise movie sucked purely because kstews character/acting... ps: lisap!
June 1, 2012, 4:33 p.m. CST
by Ash Talon
I think too many of you may be missing an aspect to the whole "fairest" aspect to the story. <p> Did you ever think that the evil queen is just wrong with the belief that "fairest" means beautiful in a physical (ie vain) way? She's incapable of understanding that "fairest" might be the most beautiful in virtue and moral value. <p> Hence, Snow White doesn't need to be better looking than the evil queen. She shouldn't be. The tale, if it's to have moral relevance to our times, should be about inner worth. Not superficiality. How you guys don't get this speaks volumes to problems in our society. <p> That said, I haven't seen the movie (yet). Not do I like Stewart as an actress.
June 1, 2012, 6:26 p.m. CST
by Cheif Brody
Yes...there's two definitions of "fairest"...the vain one...and the moral compass/inner worth one... And any good adaptation of Snow White's story should include both definitions...and it appears this adaptation has a healthy dose of both meanings.<p> The Queen makes the mistake of asking The Mirror the wrong question. She is obsessed with the "vanity" definition...or "most beautiful in all the land" question...thus, her need for "soul botoxing" throughout the movie...to preserve her gorgeous appearance. Meanwhile her "inner worth" is sorely lacking. <p> Whereas, Snow White represents the other definition of "fairest"... Untouched by evil thoughts & ways even though her life began with tragedy.... but she also happens to be drop dead gorgeous...which makes her the ideal prize for the Queen. <p> The "most beautiful" definition always gets the the top billing in most cases...afterall...one of the main characters in the story is a fucking MIRROR! The most vainity inducing item in the universe....But it's the "inner beauty" within Snow White that always triumphs in the end. <p> That's exactly why that particular Grimm tale is genius...and a classic story for all time. <p> Just saying...Casting Stewart was NOT a genius decision...and will probably keep this adaptation from being the fairest live-action Snow White..."of them all".
June 1, 2012, 9:53 p.m. CST
by Nasty In The Pasty
The visuals are STUNNING throughout, like a mixutre of Ridley Scott and Hayao Miyazaki, and Charlize Theron is HOT as FUCK and terrifying at the same time. The story is no great shakes (one imagines a lot of character-building footage hit the cutting room floor, particularly for the Dwarves), but it's worth seeing for the visuals alone, Theron and Chris Hemsworth kicking ass. K-Stew is mediocre, but name ONE Snow White actress who has been given anything of worth to the character...she's INTENDED to be a gorgeous blank. Loved the Dwarf special effects.
June 1, 2012, 10:20 p.m. CST
But I have to say that I found no chemistry between Stewart and Hemsworth. And ten gets you twenty that the film's ending originally had them more explicitly together, but test audiences didn't like the change from the traditional story. Because that ending looked reshot.
June 1, 2012, 11:35 p.m. CST
Not so much the content or vigor of her speech. They rally behind her because of her purity and courage, rather than her rousing confidence. They will fight to restore the innocence that Snow Whaite embodies and she will lead them not as a warrior but as their spiritual muse.
June 2, 2012, 4:09 a.m. CST
by Bedknobs and Boomsticks
boy/girl-ish face with a pixie slightly upturned nose and sexy legs which she is aware of and always shows--oh, and the awkward/apprehensive lip-bite-y grin she is usually attempting is a bit of a turn on. Would do, most definitely.
June 2, 2012, 10:25 a.m. CST
You say that you are decidedly mixed on the movie, but most of your review is filled with praises for the film. The only detractor you really focus on comes at the end, and its Kristen Stewart? That's it? There's no real mention of how well Thor acts, or if this is really Charlize Theron's movie (as the ads imply) and how well she carries the movie. There's no real discussion of script or plotting or pacing. I guess I expected more from you on why this is mixed, more than just Kristen Stewart didn't deliver in a speech scene that was supposed to be "rousing" but fell flat instead. Did you rush on this one?
June 2, 2012, 2:34 p.m. CST
by Bald Evil
Once you see it, you can't un-see it.