Cool News
Quint has seen Andrew Dominik's crime thriller KILLING THEM SOFTLY starring Brad Pitt! Cannes 2012!
Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with some thoughts on Andrew Dominik’s Killing Them Softly, a crime picture about the repercussions of a high dollar mob-run poker game robbery.
It was a surefire bet, this film. Dominik’s The Assassination of Jesse James, also starring Brad Pitt, is gorgeous, touching, well-acted and just experimental enough to make an old genre feel fresh on the screen. It’s not perfect, but it’s a substantial movie.
So when I left the theater unimpressed by Killing Them Softly it was a bit of a surprise to me. Like Jesse James, it’s a good looking picture. Like Jesse James, there’s a nice experimental edge to the movie. Like Jesse James, Brad Pitt is pretty great in the film.

The movie’s not bad, but it was disappointingly on the nose. Set during the 2008 election, when the US economy was falling into the shitter, there’s an overt political parallel that would have benefited from being in the background instead of almost a narration of the events of the movie. It felt like Dominik didn’t trust the audience to pick up on the similarities between political and gangster bureaucracy, so we have to start the movie on a shot of side-by-side Obama/McCain campaign billboards and have political speeches overlaying every other scene.
But subtle isn’t exactly the name of the game in this movie. When Brad Pitt, an expert hitman brought in to figure out the identity of the robbers, comes in they play Johnny Cash’s When The Man Comes Around. See, because he’s the man and he’s comin’ around.
I usually like it when films go big like that, but for whatever reason in this film every time they did it felt forced to me. Minus that little trip-up, everything with Pitt is golden. You buy him as the ultimate fixer that knows his shit, can figure out every angle and is just as adept at political maneuvering as he is at exploding some poor bastard’s head.
My main trouble with the movie is that it’s ultimately a very small story that would be fine if they didn’t waste so much time on the two hoods, an Australian bum and a thick-accented Bah-stin type that would usually be played by an Affleck.
These two guys, played by Scoot McNairy and Ben Mendelsohn make the first impression of the film as their hiring is what kicks off the plot. I wish I could love them both because if I did then I would be writing a glowing review instead of a “yeah, it’s good, but I’m not in love with it…” review.
Of the two, McNairy actually grew on me because there was a resolution for his character so it feels like the time I invested in him went somewhere. He has some scenes towards the end of the movie where I understood why he was cast. The over-the-top cartoon he was playing earlier disappears into an honest to God empathetic character. Mendelsohn never gets to cross that line. He starts as a dickish druggie loser and ends a dickish druggie loser. It’s a one-note character and unfortunately it was a note that I didn’t much care for.
If these characters were the focus of the movie then I’d be frothing at the mouth angry, but if there’s one thing Dominik got right it’s the supporting cast.
Even though looking at the film objectively they could have lost every scene James Gandolfini is in, completely excise his character from the film, and the plot wouldn’t change one iota, Gandolfini is so good that I was happy every second he was in the film.
Ray Liotta gives probably the best supporting performance in the film as the patsy, a pathetic specimen that is just smart enough to execute some really stupid ideas. He gets beat to hell and back in the film and it’s an interesting twist for Liotta who usually plays the one giving the beatings, not receiving them. He plays his character like a big dumb dog and somehow becomes the most sympathetic person in the movie.
And then there’s Richard Jenkins, who has grown into one of my favorite working character actors over the last few years. He plays a kind of middle man between the big bosses, who want the robbery situation dealt with, and Pitt’s Jackie Coogan. He’s uptight, over-worked and easily stressed… in other words it’s the perfect role for Richard Jenkins. He’s the character that most obviously connects the government/mob parallel since he can’t authorize anything without getting a board’s approval and it forces Jackie Coogan’s job to slow to a crawl.

Like I mentioned above, Dominik’s filmmaking work is top notch, I just didn’t like a some of the character work and casting choices he made. Visually it’s a very inventive, sharp and bloody film, it’s just one that took about half an hour for me to start investing in.
Mixed reviews are the hardest to write because if you focus too much on what didn’t work it sounds like you flat-out hate the movie and if you focus too much on what does work it sounds like you liked the movie and are just nitpicking it or looking for an excuse to not like it.
Killing Them Softly is the first movie of the fest that I went into expecting to love and felt let down by. I mean, Dracula 3D is awful, but I didn’t expect it to be genius. Killing Them Softly worked enough to not piss me off, but didn’t send me out of the theater whooping and hollering like I was expecting it to.
Ah, well. Maybe it’ll grow on me with a second viewing.

-Eric Vespe
”Quint”
quint@aintitcool.com
Follow Me On Twitter

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus-
+ Expand All
-
Anyway, despite the awful title I'm still keen to see this.
-
May 23, 2012, 7:53 a.m. CST
So sick of Brad Pitt. A actor of very little substance..
by Baron Von Penguin
If he wasn't as handsome as he is the cunt would never have gotten a break in cinema. Having said that you could argue the same thing about 90% of Hollywood so it's a stupid thing to say but I'm gonna stick by it. He's got fuck all range and fuck all to say. I however have loads to say and I'm very successful and rich too. I've just had the bedroom in my mothers house where I live painted to look like the bridge in the original Star Trek. I've finally succeeded in acquiring a pair of my neighbours underpants and bra and I'll probably put them on tonight when I watch my Quantum Leap boxset. So there, now fuck off Brad Pitt with your shit acting abilities and your pretend interest in architecture.
-
Andrew Dominik is a great director, and despite what some idiots think, Brad is a great actor and has been so consistently for the last 10-15 years.
-
...was boring as fuck.
-
I would agree that Pitt doesn't have much range and he likely coasted on his looks for a majority of his career. But I've grown to respect him lately with his charitable work that I honestly do believe he cares deeply about. That and his family. He seems a lot more grounded and removed from the whole Hollywood schlock.
-
Was the title of this one changed since production completed ? I could have sworn this was due to be called somthing else . Anybody ?
-
I kept confusing it with COOGAN'S BLUFF, but it was still a better title.
-
even though I don't really like the sound of all the big political stuff being shoved into a neo-noir flick.
-
I also like Andrew Dominik as a director, definitely for "Chopper," though I wasn't that high on "The Assassination of Jesse James." Good acting and great cinematography in that one, but both characters just... felt a bit too self-important for me. Wasn't terribly interested in them by the end. Maybe if I saw it again, I'd have a different take. As for "Killing Them Softly," I hope I'll like it when I see it. Sounds like it could've used more focused editing, but maybe I'll dig that aspect of the story. I don't know. Thanks for the review, Quint! Always interesting reading your stuff.
-
Thank you good sir . I had this on my radar but the new title threw me .
-
... with this song? Killing them softly? With this song?
-
While it takes its time I was never once bored with the film. The characters particuraly the sad pathetic Robert Ford were so involving. The freeze frame at the end is amazing,
-
He's fast becoming one of the directors that I'd watch anything they do. He's 2 for 2 in my book so far. Only down side is there seems to be a 5 to 7 year wait for his films! Here's a short clip of Killing them Softly http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xDO37sEovE
-
May 23, 2012, 9:44 a.m. CST
AWESOME POSTER!!! (the closest I've gotten to excited poster-wise since "Zodiac"'s sleeping SanFrancisco poster)
by ChaunceyGardiner
-
May 23, 2012, 9:46 a.m. CST
And really good, judicious review by the way, walking the line - so to speak.
by ChaunceyGardiner
-
That's a perfect description of my reaction to The Assassination of Jesse James - a great looking movie, really well shot, but equal parts great and annoying as fuck. I get that Robert Ford was supposed to be unlikable, but having the protagonist be such an annoying whelp grates on your nerves.
-
May 23, 2012, 10:04 a.m. CST
"...it was disappointingly on the nose" Could someone translate this for me. I've never heard the expression and have no idea what it means.
by HanYoYo
Thank you. Personally I like too many of the actors to not watch this. But it seems Quint wanted to like it but simply didn't. It's ok to hate a film, and for no particular reason. That's how things are, and people shouldn't be ashamed of their dislikes. Nor try and cheat themselves and other by trying to like something.
-
May 23, 2012, 10:57 a.m. CST
Pitt and Johnny Cash doesn't work tbecause Pitt is not the Man
by chien_sale
-
May 23, 2012, 11:10 a.m. CST
an Adam Sandler movie would have used "Ring of Fire" after he eats Taco Bell
by durhay
-
His performance in "12 Monkeys" is legendary. He was fantastic in "True Romance", "Kalifornia", "Snatch", "Seven", and "Assasination of Jesse James". Also, he totally sold "Benjamin Button" for me.
-
"on the nose" = "on the mark" I would guess the reviewer expected the movie to not be so predictable. "Paint by numbers" is another way of describing it.
-
May 23, 2012, 12:17 p.m. CST
"On the nose" is a screenwriting term. It means that there's too much exposition, too much time spent telling us this or that, as opposed to showing us. Un-cinematic.
by Pvt. Duke
-
To fuck with Tom Cruise
-
One of the greatest American films of the past decade. And anyone who says that Brad Pitt can't act should just go fuck themselves.
-
May 23, 2012, 12:54 p.m. CST
franky 5 fingers, I have bad news for you, man
by Talkbacker with no name
You lose one of those digits at some point.
-
May 23, 2012, 12:57 p.m. CST
Have I travelled back to the 90's or something? Brad Pitt can't act!?
by Talkbacker with no name
Guess not many people have seen him in anything since Cool World.
-
Wait until I get those diamonds, yo. I can afford a bionic finger.
-
May 23, 2012, 1:26 p.m. CST
Yeah, after watching a ton of movies you get movie fatigue.
by Tikidonkeypunch
Like falling asleep at Thor during my Marvel Avenger buildup. You need to space it out or you may become cynical.
-
Has only seen him in Thelma & Louise, Cutting Class, Growing Pains, and True Romance. Or they are simply a trolling gunt like foetus and nerd rage.
-
How is the score, by Nick Cave & Warren Ellis? Their score for Jesse James is one of the best movie soundtracks of all time, so I'm always excited when they're involved with a new movie.
-
and, ya know, fight club..... deaftone i feel like hes seen only one brad pitt movie, and it was prolly megamind. im really dissapointed that this wasnt awesome. it had everything, director from jesse james (phenomenal film), pitt, gandolfini, jenkins, liotta, and i think some more sopranos vets were in it like frank vincent and max casella. still can't wait though, despite what quint said
-
...as I bet it'll be compared to Killer Joe especially if that turns out to be really good.
-
There's a handful of movies I can watch pretty much whenever. High Fidelity, Wonder Boys, The Assassination of Jesse James---hard pressed to think of more right now. There aren't really any Westerns that step back and focus on a person. The Shootist is the only other movie coming to mind that has the patience and desire to examine. I'm not saying there should be a lot of Westerns that do this, but those that do and succeed have a lot of mileage. Chopper was good too. Hope this will pop up in my area.
-
I'm bummed Quint didn't love this new film but I will still give it a shot because I'll see anything AD puts out at this point and same for BP.
-
huge Dominik fan, bummed to hear about a heavy handed film
Top Talkbacks
- Spoilery early review of MAN OF STEEL!! -- 111 total posts 79 posts
- Holy Crossover!! Magneto’s Boy Quicksilver To Speed About In Whedon’s AVENGERS 2 And Singer’s X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST?? -- 242 total posts 30 posts
- Ron Howard's latest trailer sure is a RUSH!!! -- 41 total posts 12 posts
- That rumor about Sony selling SPIDER-MAN? Don't you believe it for a second! -- 440 total posts 12 posts
- So where is FAST AND FURIOUS 7 going to take place!?! -- 95 total posts 8 posts
- Green-Band and Red-Band trailers for the new Jason Sudeikis & Jennifer Aniston VACATION ripoff, WE'RE THE MILLERS are here!! -- 98 total posts 6 posts
- Lance Henriksen On HANNIBAL!! Ruffalo On KIMMEL!! New WIPEOUT & ANGER!! The Premieres Of SAVE ME And HAVE TO GO!! AMERICAN BIBLE CHALLENGE And GOING TO HELL Finales!! Herc’s Thursday TV Talkback!! -- 21 total posts 5 posts
- Next on the Reboot assemblyline? TIMECOP!! -- 146 total posts 4 posts
- Papa Vinyard thinks that HANGOVER: PART III was a paycheck grab for a buncha people who are already rich!! -- 179 total posts 4 posts
- Please Don't Scream At The New Trailer For Elijah Wood's MANIAC...You're So Beautiful!! -- 34 total posts 3 posts

