Movie News

The CARRIE Remake Adds Julianne Moore!!

Published at: May 14, 2012, 8:56 a.m. CST by The Kidd

The Kidd here...

The more this MGM remake of CARRIE comes together, the more intriguing it becomes with the choices being made. 

While there is no denying that there's a certain amount of skepticism built into the idea of redoing this adaptation of Stephen King's work again (the TV movie didn't go so well), the talent involved in it is enough to raise your eyebrows and have you consider that maybe, just maybe they can make this into something really good. 

Julianne Moore is now official, having accept the role of Margaret White, the mother of Carrie, a part which earned Piper Laurie a Best Supporting Actress Oscar nomination back in 1977. Deadline also reports that Gabriella Wilde, whose lone notable role was as Constance Bonacieux in Paul W.S. Anderson's THE THREE MUSKETEERS, has also been locked up for the film, set to play popular girl Sue Snell, who was originally played by Amy Irving in Brian De Palma's original. 

A tremendous cast does not necessarily make a film, as DARK SHADOWS proves, but with filmmaker Kimberly Peirce calling the shots and Chloe Moretz in the lead, now with Julianne Moore attempted to follow-up Laurie's memorable turn, there's enough to be hopeful about here that, if a CARRIE remake is indeed happening, the least they can do is do it well. 

  

 

-Billy Donnelly

"The Infamous Billy The Kidd"

BillyTheKidd@aintitcool.com

Follow me on Twitter.

Readers Talkback

comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • May 14, 2012, 9 a.m. CST

    FIRST?

    by Astronut

    Hmm.

  • May 14, 2012, 9:01 a.m. CST

    Why?

    by Kevin

  • May 14, 2012, 9:02 a.m. CST

    Looks like you have learned your lesson

    by Jaster Mareel

    Always, always, ALWAYS post hot picks of female casting.

  • May 14, 2012, 9:03 a.m. CST

    who is that in the pic?

    by Rupee88

    not clear

  • May 14, 2012, 9:04 a.m. CST

    That's actually not bad casting.

    by The Shropshire Slasher

    Still no need to remake it.

  • May 14, 2012, 9:06 a.m. CST

    Gabriella Zanna Vanessa Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe aka Wilde

    by Rtobert

  • May 14, 2012, 9:07 a.m. CST

    It's Gabriella Wilde

    by judderman

    Thank God. The talent behind this has mellowed my thoughts on the remake, though I still have to wonder why. I mean Hell, Star Wars and Close Encounters were released in 77 too, and Jaws is 3 years older, but no one's ever contemplated remaking them. Ripping them off, sure, but remakes? Never.

  • May 14, 2012, 9:07 a.m. CST

    Girl in the pic...

    by MrMajestic

    Man that girl in the pic sure looks jailbait-y. *Must control urge to fap*

  • May 14, 2012, 9:08 a.m. CST

    Chloe in the pic?

    by Brian

    She's ALREADY too sexy for her age. Now look at her at 16! Okay, that's not her. And it's not Julianne Moore. Who is she? As for the movie... a very important question a producer should ask before making a movie is... WHY? WHO ASKED FOR THIS? No one asked for a Carrie remake! Yeesh.

  • May 14, 2012, 9:08 a.m. CST

    mrmajestic : out of your league

    by Rtobert

  • May 14, 2012, 9:21 a.m. CST

    Are they going to recreate the *Bung it up* shower scene....

    by Rameses

    with Chloe?....Surprised no one mentioned that!

  • May 14, 2012, 9:25 a.m. CST

    Heard this ages ago.

    by ChickenStu

  • May 14, 2012, 9:27 a.m. CST

    As Dark Shadows also proved...

    by notcher

    Having Chloe Moretz in your film doesn't mean shit either. I hate this idea, remakes are like reruns, we know what's going to happen. And Julianne Moore is annoying as fuck, who cares?

  • May 14, 2012, 9:31 a.m. CST

    by ThatEndDown

    The only thing that will make this remake worth while is if they stick to the post-prom activities in the book — namely the fact that Carrie practically destroys the entire town.

  • May 14, 2012, 9:32 a.m. CST

    Is this Carrie or Lolita?

    by The Outlander

    or CVL: Carrie Vs Lolita?

  • May 14, 2012, 9:39 a.m. CST

    Not Julianne Moore!

    by John

    Fanta-pants ruins every movie she appears in.

  • May 14, 2012, 10:03 a.m. CST

    Fuckin' Chloe Moretz? Seriously?

    by REMcycle

    So is that the thinking now? If you're going to either try to make a movie or RE-make a movie designed to define it's genre (Kick-Ass, Let me in, Dark Shadows, now Carrie)...it has to have Chloe Moretz in it? So far I think the only film she's been good for was Kick-Ass, and even that's a stretch because you could've put any jailbait actress in there, stuck a mask on her, had her drop a few f-bombs and throw a few daggers and every Basement-Harry would've paid their money to fap in the back row. Hell, it would've been a deal at twice the price for most BNATers.

  • May 14, 2012, 10:26 a.m. CST

    the drooling over Moretz is creepy

    by sunwukong86

    seriously guys stop it

  • May 14, 2012, 10:28 a.m. CST

    I'd rather see a remake of Maximum Overdrive than this...

    by Cinemajerk

    Seriously. What has there been? Like 20 remakes of Carrie so far?! Why? WHY do we need yet another one? Talk about beating a dead horse. This is just getting silly. There a dozens of other Stephen King novels that deserve a movie more than yet another take on Carrie. Booooooooooriiiiiiiiiiing. Pass.

  • May 14, 2012, 10:29 a.m. CST

    I wonder if this will be rated R or PG-13.

    by Mr. Pricklepants

  • May 14, 2012, 10:34 a.m. CST

    Will it be a period piece?

    by Prior Walter

    Ba dum bum!

  • May 14, 2012, 10:36 a.m. CST

    "Shut the fuck up shut the fuck up!"

    by Nasty In The Pasty

    Imagine Moore in hysterical Magnolia mode, and I can totally see her as Margaret White.

  • There's an ocean of Stephen King novels that haven't been adapted to the screen. Hell, there's even Stephen King novels that have been adapted to the screen and came out terrible. Why must they remake one of the few of his movies done right? Lame

  • May 14, 2012, 10:42 a.m. CST

    As long as it sticks closer to the tone of King's novel...

    by mrm1138

    ...and doesn't go for the over-the-top ridiculousness of De Palma's version, I'm totally for it. De Palma milked his version for schlocky suspense, whereas I thought King's book had some really genuine pathos to it. The very last scene of the movie really drives home to me how little De Palma got the source material.

  • May 14, 2012, 10:52 a.m. CST

    Eve was weak.

    by blackwood

    EVE was weak. EVE was WEAK. EVE WAS WEAK. I have little faith that anything in this adaptation can live up to the original, no matter who they cast, who directs it and who is writing the screenplay. Yes, they're throwing a lot of talent at this. But I don't think it matters. The original is every bit as vicious, heartbreaking and scary today as it was. And in the face of modern filmmaking, it seems revolutionary -- nothing made in the past decade is as daring as the films from the 70s.

  • But yeah, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

  • May 14, 2012, 10:57 a.m. CST

    Julianne "Redbeard" Moore

    by kidicarus

  • May 14, 2012, 11:01 a.m. CST

    Will this have a modern setting now?

    by Nice Marmot

    Hell, the scariest part to modern kids would be seeing kids having to shower together at school.

  • May 14, 2012, 11:02 a.m. CST

    Pretty soon we'll have a Blow Out remake with Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone...

    by openthepodbaydoorshal

    with Mitt Romney as the candidate. I know that DePalma doesn't contol the rights, but with Sisters remade a few years back, now this....whats next?

  • May 14, 2012, 11:11 a.m. CST

    read this on chloe moretz's twitter yesterday

    by JAMF

    i should start my own film news site, if this is all there is to it.

  • May 14, 2012, 11:13 a.m. CST

    Oh, and to beat that one TB'er....Aim it at her tits Eddie...

    by openthepodbaydoorshal

    After all, it is Julianne Moore...

  • May 14, 2012, 11:22 a.m. CST

    "They're all gonna laugh at you"

    by DonLogan

  • May 14, 2012, 11:25 a.m. CST

    why dont they just make Carrie 3 The Ragening Even Harder

    by Daniel

  • May 14, 2012, 11:45 a.m. CST

    Affleck was the bomb in Phantoms

    by _ISITIN3D_

    imjussayin

  • May 14, 2012, 11:55 a.m. CST

    cinemajerk, it's been done.

    by Grammaton Cleric Binks

  • Look, I know this is spam. But I've been coming here since before gordon had a beer and cheated on his wife, and before Kiera Knightly was a sexy tomboy beanpole. I made a film. For 10 grand. Its up for free on YOUTUBE in glorious 1080P. All I ask is that you give it a shot. I can best describe it as white trash Shakespeare. Its a grim little character drama about a heavy metal loving/guitar shredding meth dealer and his flunky cousin who inhabit a trailer in central oregon. It's called THE WOLFMAN's HAMMER. You can see the trailer here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfKochjSsus and the full film here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjLWrxRlmXE I know this is a hustle but it's an honest one. I'm 26 years old and this is my first feature film and I can guarantee that it's one of the best looking, most emotionally effective movies made for that budget. Thanks and take care, -Brad

  • May 14, 2012, 12:06 p.m. CST

    UPDATED: "They're all gonna LOL at you!"

    by Prior Walter

  • May 14, 2012, 12:10 p.m. CST

    They should have made Insomnia, think that deserves a movie.

    by Tikidonkeypunch

    Or that latest JFK assassination book. I actually had an idea similar to that. Maybe I'm tapped into the same wavelength as King.

  • May 14, 2012, 12:17 p.m. CST

    This remake = why

    by grendel69

    Prob just another watered down, emo, mtv style shot piece of shit.

  • May 14, 2012, 1:20 p.m. CST

    I really don't mind the remake

    by David Cloverfield

    Loved the book, but wasn't crazy for the movie. Carrie is not strictly a horror story. Then again, Chronicle did everything I think a Carrie movie should.

  • May 14, 2012, 2:01 p.m. CST

    "they should've cast Streep, the movie would've had a guaranteed Oscar nom."

    by Christian Sylvain

    ^QFT sad, isn't it?

  • May 14, 2012, 2:46 p.m. CST

    HOW COME I ALREADY KNEW THAT?

    by Johnny Wrong

    Oh yes...'cos this isn't a real news site anymore.

  • May 14, 2012, 3:50 p.m. CST

    What's the problem with Julianne Moore now?

    by Krinkle

    She's gorgeous and brilliant. Yeah, fuck her.

  • May 14, 2012, 8:25 p.m. CST

    re the cellarrat.....

    by DANGER_DIABOLIK_

    ....don't do it Sir!!! Don't do it !!!!! Next you'll be saying...what about the Bush...!!!!!

  • May 14, 2012, 9:03 p.m. CST

    This is strange.

    by Yelsaeb

    Most of the time remakes seemed screwed from the beginning, but the casting denotes that this one may have a little bit of hope.

  • May 14, 2012, 10:40 p.m. CST

    What's up with the scratches on that chicks ass?

    by adeceasedfan

    Seems to have the hot psycho down pat.

  • May 15, 2012, 12:07 a.m. CST

    They're all going to fap to you!

    by Walterego

    This reboot is clearly going to sex up the character. Which just makes her another movie about a bad girl with a tough as nails attitude. The original was about a vulnerable, damaged, timid girl who was so mentally abused she was terrified when she gets her period, she is a shell of a person, frightened and victimized. When she finally loses it, it is as though a repressed split personality is taking control. Casting jailbait sex-b-bomb Chloe Moretz makes her just one of the many trying-to-be-a-bad-ass, hyper-mature types which are common in high schools. I fully expect Moretz to casually light a cigarette as she walks away with her back to the burning prom as the bitchy-girl's car explodes behind her.

  • May 15, 2012, 9:03 a.m. CST

    TV version

    by Hipshot

    Was damaged by trying to turn Carrie into an "Incredible Hulk" style series character. The ending was just suckage, which weakened and damages much of the structure that came before. That said, there actually were moments of interest--but it was also too slavish to the original film, actually stealing some of the shots. Doing another version of the book is just standard drama as practiced for almost 3000 years (classic Greek tragedy discouraged the creation of "new stories," preferring to reinterpret the classics) but that's no excuse for making a piece of shit.