Cool News
AICN COMICS REVIEWS: AVENGERS VS X-MEN! LAST OF THE GREATS! DOROTHY OF OZ! REBEL BLOOD! BLUE BEETLE! & MORE!!!
| Issue #53 | Release Date: 3/21/12 | Vol.#10 |
(Click title to go directly to the review)
Advance Review: AVENGERS VS X-MEN #0-1
SUPER CROOKS #1
REBEL BLOOD #1
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #682
BLUE BEETLE #7
Advance Review: DOROTHY OF OZ PREQUEL #1
YI SOON SHIN #1-4
LAST OF THE GREATS VOL.1
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #682
THE HARPIES as published in THE JAMES BOND OMNIBUS 003
Advance Review: AVENGERS VS X-MEN #1
AVENGERS VS X-MEN #0
Writers: Brian Michael Bendis & Jason AaronArt: Frank Cho
Publisher: Marvel Comics
Reviewer: Johnny Destructo
"It all begins HERE!"
Or, if you're to pay attention to the Marvel publicity machine, it all began during THE CHILDREN’S CRUSADE. Or if you're to pay attention to the Marvel publicity machine contradict itself, it all began during AVENGERS: X-SANCTION. Strange how things don't actually begin in the ...you know...beginning. With number 1. Instead we get a prelude to a prelude to a prelude.
So here we are, in our 3rd prelude. And, shockingly, it was a hell of a good time!
The best part of this pretty exciting issue though was Frank Cho's art. This fella could draw a manual on the most grotesque STD's and produce something amazing. He's pretty good, is what I'm sayin'. Though his Hope does come across a little bit older than she should and the car crash in the beginning of the issue is a teensy bit static. Everything else though, is beyond beautiful. I even like how he has his own very specific way of drawing Cyclops. You can see, which this depiction why Wolverine calls him Slim. And the ladies. Cho can draw him some ladies.
On top of amazing art though, why else should you buy this issue? How about M.O.D.O.K. and creepy dinosaur robots? How about The Vision's first interaction with the Scarlet Witch, now that she's back? How about the Serpent Society? Headbutts! Jet-packs! Teenage girls with giant burly man-bodies! Oh, and Frank Cho drawing stuff. That's there too.
I've been bored with the idea of this crossover since I first heard about it, but boy-howdy, did I enjoy this issue more than I thought I would.
I actually enjoyed it more than I enjoyed the ACTUAL beginning of this story: AVENGERS VS X-MEN #1. And speaking of which:
AVENGERS VS X-MEN #1
Writers: Brian Michael Bendis, Jason Aaron, Jonathan Hickman, Ed Brubaker, Matt FractionScript: Brian Michael Bendis
Artist: John Romita Jr. (pencils), Scott Hanna (inks)
Publisher: Marvel Comics
Reviewer: Johnny Destructo
Whelp, this one didn't tickle my comic buttons as much as issue 0 did, but this was still a pretty ok start.
An unidentified crashing object starts off this issue, causing quite a bit of horseplay, and the way the Avengers respond and ward off potential disaster was pretty pulse-pounding to read. Then we get a pretty intense scene of Scott training Hope. But then...there's an essentially needless scene of Cap and Iron Man going to the President with their suspicions, which is probably only there to catch up any new readers. And then a needless scene of Cap going to the Jean Grey School to talk to Wolverine. And then a scene of the X-men talky talk talking, all to get us to the pretty unbelievable scene of Scott taking the first swing at Captain America?!? Weeeird. Scott truly has turned into a douche-nozzle.
I realize that if we were to take into consideration how these characters would ACTUALLY deal with each other, we wouldn't have a giant cross-over called AVENGERS VS X-MAN, because they would somehow work together to reach a mutually beneficial outcome instead of fighting each other in a clichéd manner. But"Avengers Brainstorm an Intelligent Solution and then Snuggle with the X-Men" is a MUCH less dramatic title, and would sell far less copies, and so, we must put even more disbelief into suspension. Because hey, it's superhero comics.
All this is to say, if you're reading a comic book called AVENGERS VS X-MEN, you aren't reading it for allusions to the current political climate, or anything even remotely intellectual. You're reading it to watch Avengers and Mutants punch each other in the grill. And this is what you get, but for a book about Avengers and Mutants getting ready to punch each other in the grill, you could do a lot worse!
Also, I should mention that I didn't know anything about the Marvel AR app until I tweeted Brian Michael Bendis about it and he dropped the knowledge on my face. So, scattered throughout the issue are little red AR blocks. Apparently, in April, you'll be able to download the Marvel AR app, and scan these little blocks, to get more inside info on the behinds the scenes? Kind of like VH1's pop-up video, I assume? I'm sure there's a more contemporary reference I could have made, but I so rarely get to mention Pop-Up Video in my reviews, so...
Also, there's just one thing I have to mention about the Jim Cheung cover. A good portion of the heroes on this image are seemingly yelling at each other, I think? But because all of them are dead in the eyes, everyone just looks like they're yawning at each other. Am I crazy? Hopefully this isn't indicative of how this whole series is going to play out ;)
Anyhoo, these first 2 issues of this giant, needless crossover in a time of rampant crossover fatigue is actually off to a pretty fun start. It's already better than FEAR ITSELF, so that's something.
JD can be found hosting the PopTards Podcast, drawing a weekly webcomic, discussing movies, comics and other flimflam over at www.poptardsgo.com, graphically designing/illustrating for a living, and Booking his Face off over here. Follow his twitter @poptardsgo. His talkback name is PopTard_JD. He is also now co-hosting another Comic Book discussion show on Party934.com alongside Bohdi Zen. They discuss comics and play music, check it out live every Saturday from 4-5pm.
SUPER CROOKS #1
Writer: Mark MillarArtist: Leinil Yu
Publisher: Marvel Icon
Reviewer: Optimous Douche
If Millar’s well-documented history and blatant public statements about hating superheroes rubs you the wrong way, move right past this review of SUPER CROOKS. If you know Millar and actually read the title of the book, it’s pretty damn easy to determine the traditional antagonist/protagonist relationship flip-flop you’ll find inside.
The real question is whether Millar’s formulaic switcheroo can entice those that don’t hate his superhero hate, like myself, but merely find themselves lukewarm to his past endeavors of deconstruction.
I really haven’t hated anything Millar’s done in the past. Short dialog and lots of swearing don’t bother me in the least; many times I prefer this approach for its reflective realism of today’s speech patterns. So I don’t hate Millar in concept; I’ve merely felt past endeavors have fallen way short on execution.
NEMESIS, at the end of the day, was the Michael Bay equivalent of comics – cool concept, lots of explosions, but characters as thin as a communion wafer. KICK-ASS was a poor deconstruction of the Batman vigilante mythos for missing a very essential element to the backstory – training. Batman did way more than throw on a wet suit before he decided to fight crime. Millar compounded the problem by making the kid a comic fan. Worse yet, it was a kid with a reading disability, since he obviously missed all that time Batman spent travelling around the world TRAINING to be a crimefighting bad ass.
SUPER CROOKS is something different and expertly dodges my word bullets of characterization by weaving together a cool concept with honest-to-God real people who have “real world” problems along with the fantastical ones. I’ll gladly put SUPER CROOKS on par with excellent material like 1985 versus my past two examples.
The book opens by introducing to the main “bad guy” of SUPER CROOKS, a “hero” by the name of Praetorian. Despite being adorned in Americana and kicking in the teeth of a group of bank robbers, Praetorian is not a wholesome embodiment of mom, dad and apple pie. With a foul mouth and cavalier concern for the safety of average citizens, Millar establishes the heroes of the SUPER CROOKS universe as bullies of the highest order. Yes, they are technically doing the right thing, but as with all things in life we have to ask, “Do the means justify the end?”
Once in detention we meet the book’s hero, an average Johnny who has the ability to channel and discharge energy. Millar establishes early that the justice system in the SUPER CROOKS world is more revolving door than the dime bag docket in New York City. Crooks come and go out of prison despite the severity of their offenses.
Before anyone decries that SUPER CROOKS is a WANTED or NEMESIS knock-off, think carefully. While thematically they live in the same galaxy, to make this comparison would be like trying to compare James Bond to an NYPD beat cop. WANTED and NEMESIS slated their bad guys as untouchables that lived at the top of the world’s food chain. With SUPER CROOKS, superpowers and those that would use them for ill-gotten gains are commonplace. We learn this by being introduced to the next member of the SUPER CROOKS team, Carmine. Even crooks grow old and like most people who rely on physical fortitude to get their job done, Carmine now has to use his mental muscle to pilfer the coffers of others. Carmine makes a bad choice by trying to scam the Vegas tables with the help of a psychic who can see 30 seconds into the future. Just like our real world casinos have instituted safeguards against card counting, and (if rumors are true) are still run by the mafia, the same is true in SUPER CROOKS. Carmine, like countless card counters, gets greedy and the casino offers him an ultimatum in a scene of mafia muscling that involves some imaginative teleportation. Basically, Carmine has less than a month to pay the casino back tenfold.
Now, our next scene is where the book truly sold me. Johnny finally gets released from prison and tries to reestablish some of his old connections, mainly the woman that who was the reason for Praetorian putting him behind bars again. There was genuine love in these pages as Johnny tries to explain to his ex-fiancée, Kasey, why he committed the heist that day even after they both agreed to go straight. Like so many of us, Johnny merely wanted the best for them as they started out in life; who hasn’t made a similarly myopic choice in the name of love? Carmine finds Johnny and Kasey and we slowly learn that he was once their mentor. Faced with a seemingly impossible task, especially on US shores, Johnny and Kasey agree to help Carmine out of his predicament by travelling overseas to where there are no superheroes.
Now, you might ask why superheroes are only specific to America, or at least not in their destination of choice--Spain. Well, I don’t have an answer. Frankly, if your willing suspension of disbelief can’t roll with the fact that there are no Superman-level heroes in this world, you might be better served getting your Millar fix in one of the other slew of titles Millarworld will be releasing this year.
Yu’s pencils are enchanting. He tackles the action with a flair for intense angles and cinematic flow. Again, though, it’s the quiet moments that won me. In the diner with Kasey you didn’t need to read one word bubble to understand the intense regret the couple has over the years they lost. Likewise the scenework with Carmine exhibited true fear and, again, regret at being caught.
I’ll buy any #1 Millar puts on the shelves. His panache for high concepts that offer a skewed view of this genre intrigues me every time. More often than not, though, the high concept lacks the support of the human drama to flesh out an actual story. SUPER CROOKS is the best of both worlds: high concept that remembers people, not events, truly drive a story.
Optimous has successfully blackmailed fellow @$$Hole BottleImp into being his artist on Average Joe. Look for Imp's forced labor on Optimous brain child in mid-2012 from COM.X. Friend Optimous on FaceBook to get Average Joe updates and because ceiling cat says it's the right thing to do.
REBEL BLOOD #1
Writer(s): Alex Link & Riley RossmoArtist: Riley Rossmo
Publisher: Image Comics
Reviewed by Humphrey Lee
While I consider myself one of those people that likes to think they will read/watch/play anything, as long as it is good, I also completely admit there are some storytelling genres I just do not wish to partake in all that much. Horror is a primary example of this as, well, even I am not completely sure why. I like suspense, I like some appropriate amounts of violence, and most good horror usually has a supernatural or science fiction slant to it as well. Not to make this review about genre and preference dissection; I guess it comes down to my not finding a terrible amount of horrific tales that have balance between the elements I mentioned, or that aren’t skewed to just a “gross out” factor, or that a lot tend to be kind of plot-light, and so forth. So, basically, all of that was a big old build up to say I was open-minded toward REBEL BLOOD but it would do some winning over.
Now, usually this is where the review usually does the “But boy am I ever wrong!” twist but, nah, I liked this okay. Right off the bat this book introduces us to our main character by having him blow the faces off of mutated wolves that apparently ripped a once cute blonde girl in twain, which is a nice statement up front for where this issue/mini-series is willing to go. It also showcases the main reason why I was interested in giving this book a shot, that being Riley Rossmo’s artwork, which I have come to be a big fan of over the spans of COWBOY NINJA VIKING and THE GREEN WAKE. Like the opening sequence it is depicting, his art is a very visceral thing full of bold, scratchy lines that pack a lot of energy in them and come together to form some very dynamic stuff. It really is one of the most expressive styles out there and usually makes the price of admission worth the chance.
The rest of the book has some admittedly interesting concepts at play, but nothing completely grabbed me outside the violent bits and some character insights on our lead, Chuck. Chuck is one of those kind of mopey types after a work incident took him from being a full-fledged fireman to being a fire spotter out in the wilderness. He then proceeds to be somewhat distant about this and the world in general, including a wife (girlfriend?) and kid he has been kind of shitty about supporting and interacting with since the incident. Obviously, getting back to them becomes his main thrust after his first encounter with the lesion-sporting meat marauders that turned the blond girl into a red stain on the snow. And since we all know now how I feel about that part of the book that essentially leaves us with a plot that is somewhat typical but that could be a bit sneaky depending on how things play out.
Basically, there was one other bit, besides the art exhibition, that I found intriguing and that was Chuck’s weird daydreaming tendencies when he’s on his way to, presumably, save the day for his lady and child from these types of rabid beast. Some involve some grandiose fantasies and some involve some pretty odd schadenfreude enjoyment at their possible plight, which is, well, disturbing. So, if anything, that adds an interesting element of our “hero” at the least being aloof, at the most being, well, a douchebag, but it seems like, end of day, this indeed is a horror book that is mostly focused on arterial spray but shows hints of more. As is, for the unusual direction and wonderfully illustrated gore, I can find myself giving this a tentative go ahead to try if that sounds like your bag. If this mutates into something more on top of that, which there are possibilities of, then all the better.
Humphrey Lee has been an avid comic book reader going on fifteen years now and a contributor to Ain't It Cool comics for quite a few as well. In fact, reading comics is about all he does in his free time and where all the money from his day job wages goes to - funding his comic book habit so he can talk about them to you, our loyal readers (lucky you). He's a bit of a social networking whore, so you can find him all over the Interwebs on sites like Twitter, The MySpaces, Facebookand a blog where he also mostly talks about comics with his free time because he hasn't the slightest semblance of a life. Sad but true, and he gladly encourages you to add, read, and comment as you will.
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #682
Writer: Dan SlottArt: Stefano Caselli
Publisher: Marvel Comics
Reviewer: The Writing Rambler
Dan Slott, you sir are a bad, bad man. After years of botched stories and retcons and all other types of web headed tomfoolery we finally have someone in charge of Spidey’s main book that gives a damn. Time and time again you show us that you take pride in telling good Spidey tales and AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #682 is yet another prime example of that.
After much hype from Marvel’s marketing team, the “Ends of the Earth” story arc has begun and from the taste were given in this first part, it looks like it’s going to be as global of a fight as promised. This story starts off as a nice contrast to the recent “Spider Island” arc, which not only confined the story to Manhattan Island itself, but also was smaller in the sense that it was something focused on Peter more than Spider-Man. We’ve seen him overcome having his powers made useless and now Slott is prepping us to watch Peter have to use every asset available to him. There’s also some great weight added to the issue by bringing in the question of Doc Ock’s motives this time around. Can a man on the verge of death truly change? Is there some redeeming quality hidden under years of over the top schemes? These types of questions are what elevate Slott’s take on Dock Ock here to a new level.
To match the quality of the story Stefano Caselli delivers some of the best Spider-Man art in the past few years. His hard work contains so much effort and detail and it pays off by giving us beautiful scenes where even background characters look stunning. The pages where the Sinister Six members are simply watching Doc Ock speak are prime examples of this. You’ll find yourself going back to just enjoy the personality he brings each character, even while they add nothing to the story this first issue.
The Spider-Man Dan Slott has developed over time feels like the one we should be getting at this point in his history. As Marvel reminds us on the front cover, this is Spidey’s 50th anniversary and after 50 years of stories it’s nice to see Peter’s advancements. We get to see the man Peter has grown up into. No longer the same old stories about the Daily Bugle and him fighting local enemies and bank robbers, Slott’s Spider-Man is advanced and his peers see him as the genius he’s always been. It’s the level of respect that Slott shows the character that makes his run on AMAZING SPIDER-MAN so great. He generally cares about giving us all good Spider-Man stories and for that alone this is worth picking up. If you haven’t picked up AMAZING in a while, now’s the time.
You can follow The Writing Rambler on his blog here and follow on Twitter @Writing_Rambler !
BLUE BEETLE #7
Writer: Tony BedardArtist: Marcio Takara
Publisher: DC Comics
Reviewer: The Dean
I have a long history of not reading the BLUE BEETLE, which is interrupted with the occasional occurrence of my reading something with the Blue Beetle in it. I knew Ted Kord well enough to care when he was shot in the head by Maxwell Lord, and I think it’s cool that the Dan Garret Beetle was the first superhero Jack Kirby ever drew (note: This is not a typo! The Golden Age‘s BLUE BEETLE under Fox Comics spelled his name with one ‘t’ while the Silver Age’s Blue Beetle under Charlton was Dan “Double T” Garrett. Also note: nobody actually called him “Double T”), but that’s pretty much as far as any iteration of the BLUE BEETLE and I go. That being said, I consider myself part of the target audience for this New 52 version of the character, and 7 issues later, I’ve been pretty pleased with what Tony Bedard has been putting out every month.
Jaime Reyes is a big part of this title’s success, I think, and Bedard does a great job capturing a classic Spider-Man vibe with the whole inundated teenager thing. Bedard pushes the Spider-Man feel a little further in BLUE BEETLE #7 by taking Jaime and “bugsuit” to New York. Here, Jaime hopes to avoid Paco, his friend and sometimes scarab-possessed foe, and maybe run into a few helpful metahumans along the way. Instead, things get just a tad worse for Jaime, since the only metahuman he runs into is the total opposite of helpful, and leads to the debut of an interesting new nemesis for the budding hero. While the story so far is entertaining enough, it’s a pretty basic template that we’ve seen many times before, but in no way do I intend for that to be a knock on Bedard’s BLUE BEETLE run thus far. By keeping it simple, Bedard gives readers a chance to familiarize themselves with the rich cast he’s built up in BLUE BEETLE so far, and to enjoy the often humorous, sometimes deadly misunderstandings between Jaime and Kahji Da - the stern, mission-oriented scarab that found a host in him.
The relationship between these two is what keeps me coming back every month, and it reminds me a lot of Peter David’s awesome CAPTAIN MARVEL run from the early 2000s (since that’s now two Marvel references for a DC series, think of it as a remake of ALL OF ME starring Hal Jordan and Sinestro. If you’ve never seen ALL OF ME, you can think of it as Firestorm, I guess…).
Marcio Takara handles the artwork for BLUE BEETLE #7, and is carrying on the nice work of Ig Guara on the series so far. Like Bedard’s writing on the series, the art is nothing groundbreaking, but it’s a lot of fun, and has a similarly safe, classic feel to it. I honestly don’t think I paid much attention to the art until I read an earlier BLUE BEETLE issue after a morning spent rereading old CRIMINAL issues and catching up on Scott Snyder’s SEVERED – two series with a gloomier mood to their artwork that Guara’s livelier pencils pulled me out of nicely. I make sure I have an issue of BLUE BEETLE close by now anytime I go to read MONOCYTE.
So if you find yourself looking to replace a recently dropped title in the near future, I’d recommend giving BLUE BEETLE a shot. This isn’t the best comic on the shelves, but it doesn’t really try to be either. Bedard and Guara (or Bedard and Takara for this one) are putting out a consistently entertaining comic, and that’s better than a lot of other teams out there can say. This may not be immediate “classic run” material for older comic shop vets, but I can easily see this being a favorite among newer generations of comic book fans, creating a much needed anchor of young readers for this long time B-lister.
Advance review: In stores today!DOROTHY OF OZ PREQUEL #1
Writer: Denton J. TiptonArtist: Blair Shedd
Publisher: IDW Publishing
Reviewer: Lyzard
Having reviewed the first issue of NO PLACE LIKE HOME and without ONCE UPON A TIME filling my need for more L. Frank Baum awesomeness, I turned my attention to DOROTHY OF OZ PREQUEL #1.
First things first--read the fine print. I never read the series DOROTHY OF OZ and was quite lost when I started the comic. The Wicked Witch of the West is gone, along with Dorothy, who has returned home. IDW, are you sure you didn’t mean “sequel?” But apparently this discrepancy is explained on the title page, where at the very bottom in tiny font there is a paragraph explaining the timeline of the original series, along with where this “prequel” picks up between the L. Frank Baum book and the comics.
So, when does this story take place? “This story tells what happened in Dorothy’s absence and made her return necessary,” which is where the first few comics began. This means that despite Dorothy being on both variations of the cover, she never once appears in this issue.
In fact, the first major character we are introduced to (besides the evil flying monkeys) is a completely new character to the tale. The Jester is supposed to be the sister of the Wicked Witch of the West, who has now claimed her castle and is preparing to take over the Emerald City. Now, I did some research (and by research I mean clicking on various links on Wikipedia) and I could find no reference to such a character. There are numerous other witches, some in the novel that were omitted in the film versions. Others appear in the numerous sequels. But the Wicked Witch of the West never had a brother nor is there any character by the name/description of the Jester in any of the stories.
As you can see, by the time I got around to grasping “The Jester and the Magic Scepter,” I was already quite a bit lost. That being said, I could care less if the Jester wasn’t a part of the canon. He’s a fun character. Think of him along the lines of Yzma from THE EMPEROR’S NEW GROOVE--funny but still a threat. He appears quite ridiculous, constantly hurting himself in a slapstick manner, but at the end of the issue you witness how dangerous his power can really be.
The middle portion of the comic focuses on that famous trio: the scarecrow, lion, and tin man. The Wicked Witch of the West’s broomstick has been stolen, unbeknownst to them, by the flying monkeys who are working for the Jester now. The lion is no longer cowardly, though he seems to be compensating for this. The scarecrow takes advantage of his newfound brains to pull a CSI on the crime scene, while the tin man has a panic attack as he is not use to having emotions yet.
Overall, it would be best to describe the comic as simple. The story isn’t layered too deep, nor the artwork rather complicated. However, the designs work, even if the flying monkeys have mohawks usually sported by punk bands. But I’m not saying there is anything wrong with this level of simplicity. There is enough tension and mystery to push the story along, but the comic is able to explore and set up the characters and the worlds easier because they don’t have to break away from the plot. The comic is a fast read, and by fast I mean I read through it the first time in less than five minutes. DOROTHY OF OZ PREQUEL is not my usual cup of tea; I like my fairy tales darker, but my preference should not be a reflection of the quality of the comic. It’s cute and funny, and that is all that should matter.
Lyzard is actually Lyz Reblin, a senior screenwriting major with an English minor at Chapman University. Along with writing for AICN, she has been published twice on the subject of vampire films.
YI SOON SHIN # 1-4
Writer: Onrie KompanArt: Giovanni Timpano and Adriana De Los Santos
Publisher: Onrie Kompan Productions
Reviewer: superhero
I really should know more about world history. I’m actually a big fan of historical documentaries. My Netflix cue is stacked with documentary film after documentary film. But I have to confess that most of the stuff that I focus my viewing time on tends to relate to the subject of 20th century: American history. I’m ashamed to admit that I haven’t really delved all that much into the history of the rest of the world. It’s not that I’m ignorant of it; it’s just that I don’t know the specifics of world history as well as I should.
When someone handed me a comic book at Wondercon about a war that occurred in Korea during the latter part of the 16th century I have to say I was pretty interested in it--especially since, as I’ve said, I don’t know as much about the history of the Asian continent as I would probably like to. It also helped that the comic itself looked very well produced when I leafed through it.
YI SOON SHIN is the story of an admiral who served in the Korean navy during what is now known as the Imjin War. During this period of conflict Japanese forces invaded Korea. Unfortunately, the Korean king and his advisors didn’t take the threat of an incursion from Japan seriously and were completely unprepared for their onslaught. Japanese forces decimated the Koreans and things deteriorated so badly that the Korean monarch actually fled the capitol city instead of standing his ground against the invaders. Only one man stood between the Japanese hordes and the complete devastation of the Korean people. That man was YI SOON SHIN.
Of course, I’m sure that many of the accounts in this comic series are exaggerated but I’ll be damned if the creators of this book didn’t make one hell of great comic out of YI SOON SHIN’S military experiences. Writer Ornie Kompan does a great job of taking a series of actual historical military engagements and crafting a compelling storyline out of them. In Kompan’s hands SHIN’s exploits during this war are crafted with just the right amount of action, drama and character development. While I’m sure that the actual YI SOON SHIN’s story is the stuff of legend in his native Korea, writer Kompan takes the fantastical parts of his myth and is able to ground them with elements of humanity. YI SOON SHIN the comic is a terrific example of comic book storytelling.
The artwork in the book is very proficient, although I think that colorist Adriana De Los Santos does most of the heavy lifting as far as the visuals of the book are concerned. It’s not that artist Giovanni Timpano does a bad job, but his art is overshadowed by the heavy “airbrush” aspect of De Los Santos’s coloring technique. In any case, the comic itself is visually appealing and could stand proudly among some of the comic book art being produced by most of the major comic publishers today.
YI SOON SHIN is an excellent read. It’s something unique in today’s comic book market and I can’t imagine any discerning comic fan would be disappointed by it. It’s a terrific achievement and should be sought out by readers looking for an epic storytelling experience.
Discovered as a babe in an abandoned comic book storage box and bitten by a radioactive comic fan when he was a teenager, superhero is actually not-so mild mannered sometime designer & cartoonist, Kristian Horn of Los Angeles, California. Some of his work can be seen at www.kristianhorn.com and check out his blog at www.parttimefanboy.com. You can check also out his webcomics at www.babybadass.com and thediplomatics.com, which is currently in development.
THE LAST OF THE GREATS VOL.1
Writer: Joshua Hale FialkovArt: Brent Peeples
Publisher: Image Comics
Reviewer: Ambush Bug
I waited for trade to read THE LAST OF THE GREATS, and having done so, I’m kicking myself for not reading this series sooner. Joshua Hale Fialkov has become one of my absolute favorite writers in today’s comics. I knew this after reading ECHOES, TUMOR, and ELK’S RUN, but he cemented my faith in his with the excellent new I, VAMPIRE series at DC. Here, Fialkov proves that there might be nothing the writer can’t write well as he tackles superheroes for the first time.
The story focuses on a world much like our own that all of a sudden discovers the existence of a family of superheroic entities. Of course, our first reaction is awe, and given human nature, our second is to destroy these alien visitors. The entities, dubbed the Greats, warned the world of a coming danger, but were wiped out by the armed forces. Lo and behold, the danger arrived and the world with its tail between its knees comes to the last of the Greats, who lives in a snowy fortress in solitude, for him to save them. Of course, the Last of the Greats is not very happy about this.
Though we’ve seen this scenario of a Superman-level hero tossed into a real world situation before with SUPREME, SUPREME POWER, NU UNIVERSE, and the excellent A GOD SOMEWHERE, Fialkov adds something new by allowing us as the reader to feel this resentment the Last feels. At first, you understand why the Last is so pissed off. But as the story goes on, you are doubly ethically twisted as to who you want to root for because Fialkov makes the Last such a ruthless and diabolical character.
This is where Fialkov’s skill as a writer shines through the brightest. He is taking you on an emotional journey here through the Last’s disappointment in the human race, his resentment for them for killing his brothers and sisters, and then his horrible retaliation by being everything the world wants him to be, all the while subtly kicking the world in the nuts for being so reliant on one quick solution to their multiple problems. Fialkov does a great job of exploring the current quick fix culture in this series, holding a mirror to the reader and forcing them to examine their own reliance on higher power to do things that they could do themselves.
At the same time, Fialkov does go into Garth Ennis territory by injecting some pretty raunchy moments here and there. Most readers will take Fialkov to task about the man on man rape scene. I’ve heard folks say this was put into the story for a shock, but honestly, the subtext was there from issue #1 regarding the complicated relationship between the Last and Beaumont (the Last’s liaison with the outside world); this despicable act was just a brutal result of that. I was much more skeeved with the fact that the Last has sex with Oprah than the events of issue #4.
As a whole, THE LAST OF THE GREATS serves as a fantastic dissection of the human condition regarding our dependence (or need for dependence) on a higher power to get things done. With straightforward and somewhat old school art provided by Brent Peeples, THE LAST OF THE GREATS is indeed one of the great miniseries of the year. If Fialkov can write complex superheroics this well, I’d love to see what would happen if they let him loose on the rest of the DCU.
Ambush Bug is Mark L. Miller, original @$$Hole/wordslinger/reviewer/co-editor of AICN Comics for over ten years. He has written comics such as MUSCLES & FIGHTS, MUSCLES & FRIGHTS, VINCENT PRICE PRESENTS TINGLERS & WITCHFINDER GENERAL, THE DEATHSPORT GAMES, WONDERLAND ANNUAL 2010 & NANNY & HANK (soon to be made into a feature film from Uptown 6 Films). He is also a regular writer for FAMOUS MONSTERS OF FILMLAND & has co-written their first ever comic book LUNA: ORDER OF THE WEREWOLF (to be released in October 2012 as an 100-pg original graphic novel). Mark has just announced his new comic book miniseries GRIMM FAIRY TALES PRESENTS THE JUNGLE BOOK from Zenescope Entertainment to be released in March 2012. AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #682
Writer: Dan SlottArt: Stefano Caselli
Publisher: Marvel Comics
Reviewer: Henry Higgins is My Homeboy
Burning Up.
It feels like only yesterday since “Spider Island” took over the New York-based heroes titles, and already, it’s time for a new “Event” to take place for Mr. Parker. However, this is the big one, the one that’s been building since #600. Eighty-two issues later, and Dr. Octopus has finally begun his final gambit against the world. Slott manages to make it more self contained than “Spider Island”, but what remains to be seen is if he can match that story, which by all accounts was phenomenal.
Writing: (4/5) I’ve said before that I predict Slott will go down as one of the finest writers in the webhead’s near fifty year tenure, and it’s mostly due to his amazing grasp on the character. Peter has finally earned some confidence, and nothing shows that off more then within the early pages of this issue. As Peter walks through the streets of New York, he reflects on his own recent advances in the world, not Spidey’s. It’s a great little scene that shows Peter finally enjoying being a real, productive adult.
The threat itself is completely within Dr. Octopus’s capacity, and its motivation is simple, but effective. It also makes for an interesting moral dilemma, as it will force the heroes to decide whether an all-out terrible man should be allowed one act of altruism (mind you, one he shows off by almost wiping out a chunk of the globe). It also presents a nice back and forth for Peter, especially thanks to his work at Horizon Labs opening the flood gates for conflict. Is this any more dangerous than the time machine door that was created issues ago? I hope Slott plays on this angle, and I believe he will.
Slott has made wonderful headway with the supporting cast of this title, but he seems to be taking a step back with Jonah. It was nice seeing his portrayal deviate from the typical angry old man who yells at everyone and more into a committed mayor who yells at everyone. But turning him into the great threat to Horizon Labs feels shallow. His motivation, while in tune with Jonah’s character, doesn’t really fly when Jonah didn’t attempt this same maneuver on other organizations that have put John at risk.
Art: (4/5) To be honest, I’m a big fan of Caselli’s art. It always looks dynamic, leaves room for grandeur but consistently has fantastic small moments. It blends a certain cartoony appeal with the more realistic designs. The few small hints of action in this issue flow incredibly well, and look very good. His best moment, though (and this may have something to due with my current residence in Chicago), comes during Doctor Octopus’s show of power. Look at the man screaming in pain when it cuts to Chicago. With one man, Caselli shows the clear agony he’s in. It’s tremendous. And the rest of shot shows off Caselli well, managing to make each and every person in the spread have a very clear response.
Frank Martin Jr. matches the art well, with bright colours and clear and appropriate shadowing. The art for the book looks well throughout. Well, almost. My biggest problem is the new suit unveiled this issue, and...I do not like it. At all. It managed to sap a great deal of excitement out of me. It’s too bulky, too odd looking, too complicated. Art in Spider-Man books is often great, partly due to the simplicity of Spider-Man’s suit. Even most of his alternative suits have a certain dynamic sense to them. This? This one just looks silly.
This is counteracted, though, by the fact that Spider-Man’s “Goblin Glider” looks like a giant Spider Tracer. And that’s so ridiculous I love it.
Best Moment: I fucking love that Spider Glider. I want Spider-Man to always have that at the ready.
Slott? Can you please find an excuse to have Spider-Man fight Green Goblin, and pull that out? Please? I just want to see Norman, after years of being built up as the evil Tony Stark, have to deal with the fact that his nemesis stole his glider idea.
Worst Moment: The suit.
Overall: (4/5) A good start to what is hopefully a triumphant story.
THE HARPIES as published in THE JAMES BOND OMNIBUS 003
Writer: Ian FlemingAdapted by: Jim Fleming
Illustrator: Horak
Publisher: Titan Books
Reviewed by: superhero
"The Harpies" is the first story in the about-to-be published JAMES BOND OMNIBUS 003. Because my own personal schedule does tend to get in the way of reading and reviewing comic books at times, I've decided to break down this edition of the JAMES BOND OMNIBUS and review each story on its own, the reason being that I feel badly that a publisher will take the time to send me a collection and it'll be weeks before I'm able to consume the volume as a whole and by then the release date has come and gone. So for the next couple of weeks I'll be presenting reviews of each chapter of the JAMES BOND OMNIBUS 003. It is a bit of a different way of doing things, but we here at AICN Comics have never been known to do things in the "proper" manner and I hope some of you readers out there will indulge me in this tactic of reviewing a book."The Harpies", to me, is very much what you’d expect from a James Bond story. To be fair, I’ve never actually read one of the novels, but having seen just about every Bond film made I can safely say that this particular entry in the James Bond mythos is something that at least fans of the films would certainly enjoy.
The story opens with a mysterious figure hitching a ride on top of a truck in the middle of the night. When day breaks and the truck arrives at its destination it’s discovered that the stowaway was actually a woman and that she’s died during her unfortunate journey. At about the same time a scientist holds a press conference stating that he’s invented a horrible weapon that he calls a “Q-Ray”. At the gathering he claims that the weapon is so terrible he’s decided to destroy it before it can be misused by any of the world’s governments. A female gang of kidnappers wearing what look to be Batgirl costumes equipped with miniature rocket packs then captures him as the press conference wraps up. The local police and MI-6 make the connection that the kidnappers are actually an all-female splinter group of the “Maggia” that call themselves “The Harpies”. What’s the connection between the female corpse, the scientist, and The Harpies? Well, that’s up to our man Bond to discover, isn’t it?
"The Harpies" is classic Bond all the way. Scientists with doomsday weapons, sexy and lethal bond girls, infiltration of the crazed villain’s stronghold…it’s pretty much a straightforward little spy tale that encapsulates everything that’s fun about the genre. There’s nothing too complex here and some of the developments are entirely telegraphed but the story itself was entertaining enough that I didn’t mind the lapses into predictability. All in all, "The Harpies" is a fun little adventure that is very much in the vein of the original Bond films or the old classic AVENGERS TV show.
The most impressive aspect of this story and, indeed, the whole book in general is the artwork by someone who is only credited as “Horak”. Horak’s style is so terrifically bold and original that I can only imagine that it must have stood out like a neon sign at the time that these strips were originally published. His (I’m assuming it’s a him) illustration technique is some sort of weird combination of Alex Toth and Howard Chaykin. The panel composition is masterful and Horak is able to do such dynamic stuff with his linework that I would find myself staring at panels and trying to figure out exactly what tools he was using to get the effects he was achieving. I actually really wished that Titan Books had published this book in a larger format so that I could get a better look at Horak’s artwork. If anything I’d say the art in this collection is worth the purchase price alone. It’s just completely different than anything I’ve ever seen published from this era.
Next week in the JAMES BOND OMNIBUS 003: RIVER OF DEATH!
AVENGERS VS X-MEN #1
Writers: Brian Michael Bendis, Jason Aaron, Jonathan Hickman, Ed Brubaker, Matt FractionScript: Brian Michael Bendis
Artist: John Romita Jr. (pencils), Scott Hanna (inks)
Publisher: Marvel Comics
Reviewer: KletusCassidy
What we know so far is that the Phoenix is coming and Captain America & Ironman believe that it’s found a new host and is coming to earth to claim said host and burn Earth to a smoldering piece of charcoal. I’m hoping this comic series doesn’t end up the same way…heh heh…sorry. This series is basically something that people have debated time after time; who would win in an all out brawl between the two premier superhero teams in the Marvel Universe and I am definitely someone who is all about seeing these teams kick each others @$$es BUT I still find myself wondering; 1.Where the hell the villains are (again), I mean they have to be trying to capitalize on this situation, right? And 2, is it really necessary for these two teams to be fighting each other?
The positive side of this book is that the story flows pretty well and avoids a lot of the things I dislike about some of Bendis’ writing, there’s no lengthy dialog, the comic is straight to the point and the action starts early and sustains throughout the book. While this isn’t as great of a first issue as the SIEGE or AVENGERS DIASSASEMLED first issues (in my opinion, some of Bendis’s better event comics), it’s still a somewhat satisfying read because it gets to the point rather than dancing around it. The negative side is, and this may be a personal problem of mine but here goes, that I am having a hard time believing that damn near ALL of the Avengers (Spider-man, Daredevil, Dr. Strange?!?) think it’s a good idea to attack the X-Men just because Cyclops is being a dick (again) and doesn’t see things the same way as Captain America & Ironman. Also, how is fighting each other going to stop the Phoenix from obliterating earth? Namor makes a good point about Captain America coming to Utopia (I call it Mutopia) suited up and ready to fight, which was that he was already planning to do battle rather than figuring out how they can work together to solve the riddle of the Phoenix (heh).
So you have a cosmic being so powerful that it has Galactus sleeping with a nightlight on and the only people that can do something about it are fighting each other?!?! I realize this is a personal problem which other people may not care about but I figured it was worth mentioning why I’m not fully behind this issue. I am totally stoked about these individual fights but I also want good motivation for them, I mean why wouldn’t Cap just say, “Hey we know the Phoenix is coming, lets work together so Earth isn’t destroyed…remember that whole CIVIL WAR thing, where all the heroes fought for days, destroyed NY and then I cried…well uh…I don’t want to do that again.” I will say that I have faith in Hickman & Brubaker, so if they’re involved, I think there will be some cool stuff to come out of this series but right now…I’m not sold (yet?!?).
The art…ugh...the art…Romita Jr. used to be a guy that I looked forward to seeing his art every time and I’d buy just about anything with his name on it (still true to some degree) but man…there are parts of this book that look very rushed. There are also parts of this comic that look really muddy and smudged, I don’t know if it was a printing problem or an inker problem but the first 8 or so pages of this book look bad (aside from the parts with Spider-man weirdly enough). Once a certain cosmic character who was feared dead shows up, the art gets better, but if it is a printing problem MARVEL needs to tighten the fuck up if they expect Ol’ Kletus to shell out $4 every other week for this comic. Why they didn’t go with Oliver Coipel or Jim Cheung for every issue is a mystery to me but I guess we can’t have it all.
I’m not trying to sound like a hater because this book isn’t terrible, but between the muddy first 1/3 of the book and the asinine actions of both Cyclops and Captain America, I can’t really say I’m super excited for next issue but I am curious as to how this will play out. I know I sound somewhat negative but FEAR ITSELF left a crappy taste in my mouth and in my wallet, so now I feel like I need to be extra critical if I’m going to spend $50 on something, especially since the comic store I work at is closing and I’m getting laid off (pour out a little liquor for Ol’ Kletus...).
I’m not going to lie, I am stoked about the fights that have been teased but I’d also like a good story and art to accompany the fighting. I would have liked to see Hope kidnapped by Mr. Sinister or Dr. Doom or The High Evolutionary or Kang or Thanos or all of the above in hopes that they could harness the power of the Phoenix for their own devious purposes thus forcing the heroes to rush to fight a evil threat all the while having the Phoenix hanging over their heads en route to destroy earth, thus ramping up the tension. This also would have satisfied my need for some real high level villains (not Norman Osborne) to get back in the fucking game instead of sitting around watching BREAKING BAD in their underwear eating a block of cheese.
Like I said this comic isn’t terrible but I really Hope (tee hee) that characters’ motivations for fighting one another become a little clearer and the art gets a little better. That being said, I’m in for another issue.
Proofs, co-edits & common sense provided by Sleazy G
Check out AICN COMICS on Facebook and Comixpedia.org!
Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus-
+ Expand All
-
March 28, 2012, 7:49 a.m. CST
I got Avengers vs X-Men 1-4 for my birthday from a friend back in the day
by Autodidact
At the time I thought it was one of the coolest gifts I'd ever received. In those days I thought Michael Silvestri was a god... he was one of the forerunners of what I call "early 90s dynamism" AKA "Image style".
-
did you dibs AvX 1?? I'm sorry sir, didn't mean to step on yer toebits.
-
Actually, i was relieved to see that someone else had similar feelings about that issue...
-
when did avengers vs X-men #0 come out? last week?
-
Really? No one questions the whole "let's attack the X-Men" thing? But these writers are no fools, I'm sure things just escalated waaay too quickly and the grumbling from Avengers who disagree will be forthcoming. JRjr's Amazing Spider-Man run during the JMS stuff was the best of his career so far, but ever since BmB's Avengers #1, I just haven't been as into his art. He used to be my go-to guy too, I'm not sure what it is.
-
Oh man, the art those JMS issues were fucking awesome i'm gonna have to pull out some of that stuff and reread it soon. he also killed it on New Ways to Die...but after that his art went south...maybe he's just being rushed and putting out too much stuff at once? he probably comes through on Spidey because he knows his JR SR will whoop that ass if slacks and messes up the Romita/ Spider-man legacy...
-
March 28, 2012, 9:38 a.m. CST
Dorothy of Oz is based off a book written by...
by CreamCheeseAlchemist
Baum's grandson. I got it when it when was first published around '89 or so.
-
Sorry about you getting laid off. Working in a comic book store always sounded like it'd be fun but all the things like pay, benefits, and job security would bite. Good luck.
-
First, it would have been funny if they put Wolverine on both sides of that cover. Second, this event seems to be the end result of comic book decompression. Back in the day, the Xmen and Avengers would have thrown down for 5 or 6 pages to give the readers a thrill, then they would have all agreed to work together to face the larger problem. Now, those 5 or 6 pages are apparently the whole series. At least they could have done something like JLA/Avengers and have some cosmic whatsis forcing them to fight each other.
-
What's with all these comic book writers who hate superheroes but then write about them anyway? If Millar doesn't like superheroes, there are whole other areas of comic bookery for him to work in (they just don't pay as well). I remember reading Frank Miller saying some such nonsense and ever since, his superhero work has sucked.
-
thanks man, i appreciate it. It was blast working here while it lasted...one of the hardest things I've ever had to do was tell all the comic customers that we were closing... On the good side me and two of my friends are thinking of starting our own comic shop, the one i worked at was a textbook store that just happened to have comics so i did get benefits and all that. We were corporately owned so every time a suit would come in they'd go, "comic books huh...i just don't get it..."
-
Superman is his all-time favorite movie, he even bought one of the original capes used for the film.
-
I've been praising this book for months, glad to see it's catching on. Can't wait for the next part of the story.
-
1,100+ comic shops signed up so SOMEBODY has to be going. I mean, when was the last time an event had this kind of promotion where you could actually eat She Hulk's crotch?
-
For crying out loud. Does this one look like the new movie one or something?
-
March 28, 2012, 10:24 a.m. CST
Hey, Kletus...how does the owner of your LCS feel about digital comics?
by 3774
-
Mark Millar = Michael Bay Geoff Johns = JJ Abrams BM Bendis = Kevin Smith Kevin Smith = Albert Pyun Frank Miller = Roger Corman Alan Moore = Stanley Kubrick Grant Morrison = Steven Soderbergh
-
March 28, 2012, 10:29 a.m. CST
Jaime REYES? So this is DC's attempt to pander for the latino readership??
by gooseud
JUST KIDDING!! (whips off troll mask revealing Goose underneath and runs off cackling Dr Evil-style)
-
I have the comixology app. I rarely even read the free ones, it just doesn't show well enough. Maybe the new Ipad 3 with the super duper screen resolution will make it more fun to read - but then it'll be a while before I shell out for one.
-
They are having the Hell Yeah guys in for a signing next Saturday, so Im pretty pumped for that. They have really done a great job creating a new-customer-friendly culture at their shop.
-
its a great series, but I havent seen anything like that since I bent over to pick up the soap while I was in prison for being wrongly convicted of killing my wife's lover in that hotel room and the warden made me start doing his taxes.
-
The Jester is a character created by Roger S. Baum (L. Frank's gret grandson) in his 1989 book DOROTHY OF OZ upon which the cartoon (and comic) is based.
-
March 28, 2012, 10:37 a.m. CST
Ive always hated Millar and thought he hated both the genre of comics and its fans
by gooseud
But never let it be said I cant admit when something happens that contradicts my previously held beliefs: Superior was really good and didnt have any of bargain-basement-Ennis-isms usually associated with Millar's work. I never would have believed he wrote it, honestly, it was so different from his usual.
-
This cannot be denied
-
Yes, I wrote my review on a bender of no sleep and multi-tasking. I confused Millar and Ennis Carry on...
-
Thanks for the heads up. I've never been a fan of relatives continuing the works of their ancestors. For instance, Dacre Stoker doing that sequel to my favorite book, Dracula. Then of course there is Brian Herbert working on more Dune books. There is a clear difference between the tone of the comics and the original story, but I think that if you are going to do something in this vein then you have to go with your gut and not try to predict what your predecessor would have done.
-
I would have much preferred it if Cheung (who did a pretty good job on Children's Crusade) had done both the cover AND the interiors. JRJR has been putting out inferior work for quite a while now.
-
The opening hero is Supercrooks was actually: The Gladiator. He had a different costume than the Praetorian (although similiar theme) and the Praetorian was only introduced later during the TV news segment. Not a big deal, but maybe might be important later. As for the book, I think it's his best one is a long time. Good intro to the world, the main characters, the big problem, and where the story is going to go. And it was surprisingly light on the type of thing he'll often do, but seems more at home in a Garth Ennis comic. So far, so good.
-
Ugh... great. I hear he's a nice guy, but I do not look forward to his art. Although LEniel Yu, however you spell his name... his stuff looked pretty good in Super Crooks. Way better than his Avengers stuff.
-
Millar doesn't hate superheroes. Look at his stuff. He may put them through the ringer, but they come out on top. And if you read his Marvel stuff? He's knows the characters and their histories. He might get side-tracked by the occasional poop joke (who doesn't?) and his creator owned stuff have difficulty bringing the big idea in for a landing, but he's a fan. Garth Ennis on the other hand...
-
Sorry to hear about your LCS. And your job. That all sucks. We're lucky here that we have four really good shops and all of them seem to be doing pretty good.
-
I don't disagree, but man did those two guys look similar. This is what happens when you read through 40 books straight and then write a review.
-
thanks man...hopefully i can start a shop that will last.
-
That's a strange comment to make. It's nonsensically arbitrary, since I think authors such as Christopher Tolkien would have something to say about it. It's also vaguely contradictory, since you enjoyed the Jester, which was a character sourced from material you weren't even aware. Yet you will dismiss a general source of such material, due to a couple of poor examples. If people can write, let them write. If they can't write, let them fail. And if their 'gut' (as you stated) leads them to follow what they were raised on throughout their life, I'm not one to summarily dismiss it.
-
I had to look back while reading. Their chest emblems are different, but color scheme, uniform style, name root origin? The only real difference I could pick up was Praetorian is crooked and the Gladiator might be an up-standing guy. I figure they must be on a team or something.
-
I think the argument has nothing to do with a progeny's choice of profession, rather riding the coattails of their parents exact idea. If you believe in genetics, one could easily roll with the fact that writers will beget more writers. Where it becomes sad is when those children don't create their own voice and merely ride on the coat tails of their parent's success. Look at Joe Hill. Great writer. Not only has he never tried to continue the story of Carey or The Shining, he doesn't even use Daddy's name. Play on playah
-
is that when they finally bring out the next trilogy? Normally, I don't like it when the relatives start trying to wring all the money out of their ancestor's creation but maybe there are exceptions.
-
...every time I hear the word 'nepotism', I instantly start thinking of that fat politician in O Brother Where Art Thou, and endlessly quoting that movie in my head. It's a clinical medical condition.
-
New York just feels weird in DC. It shouldn't be there. Gotham is New York. There shouldn't be a new york city in the DC universe. It doesn't work for me in the same way the Sentry felt out of place in the Marvel Universe, its inclusion lessens the others.
-
I wanted to start picking up an X title, and after the last thread I did some looking around and decided to go with the first Ultimate X-Men trade coming out in a month or so, and start picking up that series if I like what I read. I ultimately (hee!) chose it for the same reason my boyfriend chose The Ultimates over the Avengers. The threat of actual character death and permanent consequences makes it too gripping to pass up. The endless death-resurrection, depowering-repowering cycles can wear on me. I'm not sure if this is a 616-Miles cross, or a resurrection of the Ultimate Parker Spider-Man, time travel, or something else. For the first possibility, a refresher - The characters in this line exist outside of the regular Earth-616 continuity of the Marvel Universe and therefore do not interact with their original version counterparts. Joe Quesada has reiterated his earlier claim that the two universes will not cross over as that would signify that Marvel had 'officially run out of ideas'. For the second possibility, Marvel keeps stating that 'dead is dead' in the Ultimates universe. It's not only part of the reason I started collecting Spider-Man, it's also the reason I'm buying more titles. If they spoil that, my interest would drop considerably, to be honest. Third possibility, time travel. Sigh. I don't know. I'm skeptical. It opens up a whole new world of possible problems. See second possibility. Fourth possibility - that a 616 version of Miles will be introduced. I have to admit, that would be interesting. But I don't know if it would be compelling enough to make me want to wade into the morass of Spider titles and convoluted (and often poorly reviewed) back story. I guess we'll find out.
-
I thought Metropolis was NY. Looking at a map of the DC USA is always funny when they try to fit in all their extra cities.
-
Metropolis is in Delaware, I think. I have no idea where it resided these days in the new 52. Nor do I care. :O)
-
I believe that was a rumor started by us Chicagoans shortly after The Dark Knight started filming here. I remember that type of talk picking up with its release, and I can't remember where (Ill research more after work), but there was something confirming that Gotham was, like almost all other cities, modeled after New York
-
...lists them as across the bay from each other (Delaware Bay and New Jersey). I've always assumed Gotham was Chicago. I don't know why.
-
March 28, 2012, 1:49 p.m. CST
I always thought of the Flash's town (Star City?) as Chicago
by rev_skarekroe
Gotham and Metropolis are both aspects of New York City, though geographically, I think someone decided Gotham was farther north along the coast than NYC is. More Boston area.
-
Sorry to beat a dead horse, but last week's issue of Wonder Woman was definitely the Comic of the Week. Cliff Chiang is back on art, getting the original feeling back. And big, important stuff happens. Her lack of popularity is really working in this reboot, as Azzarello is given freedom to radically alter the background and past/present history of the Amazons. Very "wow" and highly recommended. I think Ima pass on AvsX, itll come out in trade later and it just sounds too dumb. I want to buy it, but I know I'll hate myself afterwards. Sort of like alcohol, but I still drink too much...
-
Is you IS or is you AINT my constituncy??
-
Since it's the same creative team, I'm betting it takes place in the Ultimate Universe. Also, I'm betting that it involves all the Peter clones from way back that had resulted in the creation of the Ultimate spider-woman (how come they never mention that she is actually Peter without a peter? You'd think there would be a plethora of angles you could do with a character that comes from such a place of possible gender confusion...) Also, also, I too love the threat of permanent deah in the Ultimate universe. It adds tension that you can't find in the regular universe.
-
I remember reading that Gotham was New York and Metropolis was based on Toronto of all places.
-
But isn't Flash's town Keystone City? Either way, I think it's supposed to be Chicago. While Coast City is San Fran and Opal is St. Louis.
-
Wonder Woman was great last week. It's started good and it's just getting better each issue. I'm really liking that comic.
-
Whatever the stand-ins are. The real New York City just doesn't belong in the DC Universe.
-
Bwaahahahahaha!!! Living 45 minutes from Delaware, I can tell ya thSt the idea of superman cruising Wilmington fighting villains is utterly hilarious. Bismarck south Dakota musta had prior engagements.
-
Agreed! Not sure if WW was my favorite from last week, but it was definitely one of my favorites of the series so far. I'm surprised by a lot of the negative reviews that this issue in particular got, but I loved that it was a pretty self-contained story while still pushing the overall arc forward. I think a lot of the hate comes from long time WW fans who are upset my the big changes to her mythos, and Jim Shooter made his view on this version well known, but I'm loving most of these changes and am having a great time with it aside from the occasional confusion
-
The one that took a long-standing construction of female empowerment and feminism (Amazons), and turned them into literal 'feminazi' monsters? That Wonder Woman? *shakes head laughing darkly* No...no thanks. It's probably for the best they aired that ugliness out now, though. I was almost ready to start collecting it. And it was indeed a Where Art Thou reference. I find AICN Comic Reviews a goddamned geographical oddity. 20 miles from everywhere!
-
Apparently it was the nice clean Canadian city that best reflected Superman...
-
What did Shooter say about the current Wonder Woman?
-
March 28, 2012, 2:34 p.m. CST
A good portion of the heroes on this image are seemingly yelling at each other, I think? But because all of them are dead in the eyes, everyone just looks like they're yawning at each other. Am I crazy?
by blackflowerX
No your not crazy, you're spot on...And you're funny as fuck too. Awful cover btw.....
-
Jesse Custer is a classic hero ?
-
Sure, but I think the distinction in Ennis's mind is the tights. That's his line. Jesse Custer is just another man in a long line of men doing what needs to be done, taking action, he's walking the path, whereas Batman is just a weird-o perv who likes to dress up and gets his closeted gay rocks off with psycho-sexual violence--that's what I'm sure Ennis thinks.
-
Seriously? This comic reads like a Lifetime made for tv movie. Somewhere between the Scarlet Witch Soap Opera and Hope's incessant "I'm all grow'd up now" whining, Bendis manages to actually shoehorn in some plot set-up. But wow, what a load of tripe to wade through to get there. The artwork in this issue is meticulously rendered wonkiness. Someone needs to tell Cho that the human spine is not seven feet long.
-
The disposing of male babies has always been a part of the amazon myth. It's not a new facet, just one that has long been ignored by DC's version. It would be silly to take what is currently DC's best (and pretty much only well written) female character and disregard her due to something that has been a part of the Amazon legend for millenium...
-
For all his occasional forays into juvenile crap, no one writes manly men and iconic moments like Ennis. Jesse on the horse reaching down to Tulip, the Saint of Killers on the throne, Butcher going to meet his fate across tge White House lawn, Punisher battling Barracuda. No one writes big moments like Ennis.
-
The first two thirds of PReacher is still one of the best comics ever, it's just since that, to me, ever since then the guy is more concerned with shitting on Superheroes in weird and worn-out ways than returning to actual storytelling
-
The art was nice, but that was a ripoff for $3.99. It took me about 60 seconds to leaf through it at the LCS this morning, and basically nothing happens. It's two brief vignettes, one with Wanda, the second with Hope, and half of the one with Hope has been running as a preview in all the X-books for the last few weeks. I'm a completist, and even I didn't have any problem leaving that one on the shelf.
-
I'd been liking WW but the conclusion of the WW/Poseidon/Hera/Hades smackdown left me a bit confused as to who did what to whom and why. I may have to read the whole arc again but it wasn't too clear on first pass. I did like the idea of Hades as a candle head - I'm not sure why he should be a candle head but it's certainly a unique interpretation.
-
Pink, I can see where you are coming from, but the men don't come off better, they were exploitnig the women and then they get killed, true.... but where do those babies come from? I think the Amazons have always been on this edge, beginning with Hippolyta sacrificing her principles for the love of a man, who only turns around and subjugates her. More recent versions have the Amazons as asexual, with some implied lesbianism. This new version seems more "roots" based than anything, Moulton Marston,iirc, had a lot of psychosexual stuff in early WW and this sort of hearkens back to it. I guess it doesn't bother me as much because, well, its very interesting. Also because I don't think the Amazons have ever been feminist ideals like, say, Helena Bertinelli and I don't think the Amazons are usually portrayed that positively. this is certainly better than, for example, Amazons Attack. But your comments are thought provoking. I agree with hedgehog, I had to read this month's issue to understand the last issue. Hades candle blinded Hera... ok, at last I understand because I was confused and even asked for someone to clarify, but no one did... but now I get it, and this issue is very exciting despite a lack of action.
-
This is really, really long - http://www.jimshooter.com/2012/01/wonder-woman-4-review.html But in short: he's not a fan. and I'm all for renaming Hades 'Candle Head'
-
Psychopaths and warriors are two different things, despite what many modern video games may have led you to believe. Amazons by myth have only accepted female babies, but DC has chosen to go the whole 'rape men and then murder them' route. Casting an entire, formerly-established culture in an entirely negative light with no redeeming qualities is not my cup of tea. They are no longer icons. They are monsters. And the idea that Diana was oblivious to this is beyond believability. Now go back to making lame 'peter' jokes, and posting a half-dozen times in a row. I'll keep my opinion, and you keep yours.
-
Homer, I don't even know where to start. I was using black-belt level Google-Fu to pirate a complete copy of Pomeroy's study and stumbled across this wonderful review of WW, by a man Who Gets It. If you want to, take a long, careful read. http: //tinyurl. com/clq92em It'll result in a TL,DR for mouthbreathers. Which is probably a matter of convenience, since it directly refutes claims such as 'prior legend'.
-
but the raids on villages and taking the men as slaves has been in several versions of the myth from way back, long before DC came along. Now, some have it where they keep the men slaves only until the babies are born and then send any males babies away with the men slaves, but most--if they include the raids instead of just having Amazons seduce strangers and travelers as they happen along--have the men being killed afterwards and any male babies abandoned or killed outright. I know you're very threatened by me, but this is not an attack, just a correction. Look it up, it's part of myth of Amazons. And Wonder Woman really is a good book with a strong female lead. It's worth the read. Honestly, I think this issue was included to answer all the dumb questions people ask about the Amazons. "Where do the babies comes from?" "Are they all lesbians?" "How come they don't have boys?" This story provided answers and can now render the chortling stupidity that usually surrounds Amazons moot.
-
So, the crux of his arguement is the old "every issue should be self-contained and cater to the mythical New Reader?" What can you say to that? I guess he's right, it's been pretty previous issue heavy so far, but... sorry?
-
I'm paraphrasing here, but it seems like 80% of the posts are along these lines: "This is my position, I already know what your going to say in response (insert some anti-woman diatribe that never crossed 90% of the TBer's minds), and I'm just saying I dont care and dont want to hear anything you have to say. In summary, kiss my ass." (Pink throws down microphone Randy Watts-in-Coming-To-America style and walks offstage). Pink just kinda seems like one of those Republicans (in style, not content) who post in every blog they can get their hands on, spoiling for a fight wherever they can find it. Gotta be honest here, I dont remember anyone ever really saying ANYTHING aggressive towards Pink since she came here. People ARE allowed to respectfully disagree with anyone's opinion on any given book without it being the opening salvo to WWIII.
-
My posting here was BORN out of misogynistic trends in comics. It started with the whole Starfire debacle, which led into a fight between myself and the 'Assholes' (their name, not mine) over Jim Lee, who I think is a first-class tool with the way he's repeatedly handled women (due to first-hand experience and the experience of others). Since then I've stuck around, and more or less become fond of these guys, but not enough to stop calling something out when it's not on the level. As far as Joe goes, you must have completely missed his first-class attempt to troll me in the past. I simply don't like him. Probably the same way you simply don't like me. Lucky, none of it matters.
-
I hope you guys will give the return of the Valiant universe a look when they start rolling out. So Solar, Turok and Magnus aren't part of it anymore. Not a total loss. I think it's smarter for them not to try and regain the rights to them either. The amount of meddling Random House kept doing to the Dark Horse books led to the whole line getting canned. Harbinger and XO were my faves anyway. Not the Acclaim Vol 2 reboot books. Those were f'in terrible.
-
exclaim to the heavens about a lack of interest in other people's opinions. So, I want to be clear here.......you dont care about what anyone thinks....UNLESS those thoughts violate whatever vintage 70's-era sexual code of ethics you have chosen to subscribe to (I can practically feel a Burt Reynolds Smokey and the Bandit Stache growing as I read whatever the rant of the day is), at which point everyone else's thoughts become of paramount importance. So do you care, or do you not? Because if you only care on the negative, downside, angry side of things (and not on the more positive, constructive side of things), then its pretty much a no win scenario for everyone else around you, no? If you are this pissed constantly on THIS board (about as intelligent, moderate, and well thought a comics forum as exists), I shudder to think what your reaction would be to the less enlightened corners of the interwebz. But it doesnt matter, because you are above such petty concerns as other people's opinions, right? I have a confession, though, and this is going to severely puncture your highly self inflated sense of persecution and aggrievement: I dont dislike you. You rarely if ever actually talk about comics, so therefore your kind of irrelevant. I would have to classify my feelings more as mildly bemused indifference. It reminds me of a story, when Sting in the early 80's was coming off starring as Satan in Brimstone and Treacle. The Police were touring and Sting had decided that he actually WAS Satan, and was swanning around in true look-at-me diva fashion, acting like some kind of Dark Prince. Finally, Stewart Copeland pulled Sting aside in front of everyone and informed him "Sting, you arent Beezlebub, Satan, The Devil, The Dark Prince, or any of that. To be honest, your just a garden variety asshole."
-
At least I'm assuming she is - she could be another 40 year old guy ogling his collection of Avenger figurines. I haven't actually read the issue of WW in question. I always used to think the DC Amazons were all immortal and WW was the only kid they'd had since Athena put them on Paradise Island (at least that's how it read on the few times I read WW). Obviously, they should come up with a better rationale - whether this is it, I don't know.
-
I'm innocent of all charges. I wish she'd stop attacking me...
-
Anyway, I like the Amazon back story (besides the fact they're always naked and that Wonder Woman still does not wear pants and while I understand how that can be off-putting to female readers, I take those type of things as an unfortunate reality and the price of admission of not just the comic book world, but any kind of historical myth. Paternal past, y'dig? Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Also, whitewashing is bad for the future.) anyway, I like it because of what it did in issue #7. That realization shattered Diana's world view. It made her sisters fallible and I like the potential for change that represents. She's no longer a righteous avenger. She's adrift. I like that the Amazons have a darkness to them, because that gives Diana a chance to grow beyond them and be better than them, so... that's my two cents.
-
hilarious
-
Seriously, Aquaman was out this week. If you need more reviews so that you can touch upon the almighty DCU then you can certainly holler at your boy.
-
i appreciate the kind words and it's a shame because I love his work usually (Jim Cheung, that is). He's a really strong talent, I just noticed the one "whoopsie" about this cover.
-
Sorry, couldn't help but make a UHF reference. I haven't read the new issue of Wonder Woman...in fact I think I'm a couple behind.
-
Sure myth was played with and manipulated in this issue. But I don't know why feminists would want to emulate or idolize Amazons since in most stories they exhibit qualities that are violent, uncivil, and reprehensible no matter what their sex. they are and have always been represented as a race if brutal warriors and brutal warriors do brutal things. The point of the issue was to show how impulsive and misguided Wonder Woman was in assuming those who weren't asking for help needed help. It's a typical "hero assumes too much" tale. Attaching feminine politics to it is reaching to say the least. Personally I love azzarello's take and I feel his treatment of Diana is the most human I have ever read. This is from someone who has been reading WW for over ten years.
-
...I wasn't clear. I care very much about what professionals are feeding into the public consciousness with their product, and how that may effect society, however gradual or subtle that effect may be. I also care about the opinions of people who seem to reflect carefully on things (like Homer), even if they disagree. Generally, trolls and tools don't qualify for that sort of care or consideration. I got a couple of dozen words into Goose's attempt at snarky comedy, and gave up. If he breaks it into a coherent, readable form instead of a giant run-on sentence block, I'll try it again. Believe everything, hedgehog. I'm actually a sweet, delicious neckbeard. Or if you prefer the Xbox trope, I'm a woman, but fat, ugly and/or slutty, because those somehow matter. I'm also a man-hater, and I loath and fear sex. I do own a single figurine. It's a resin fairy of some kind my boyfriend bought me, but hasn't painted yet. Bug, there are several different bloggers now voicing similar thoughts I have, so I'm not a lone nut on this. The difference being, most of them (so far) have been strong fans of the current run up until this issue. Please read the link I posted if you genuinely can't understand the idolized aspect, it may at least clarify it for you, even if you don't (or won't) agree. It doesn't even make sense on a practical level. The method given means that Amazons would lose half their new population with each generation born. JD, you're really not going to comment on the Spider-Men thing? Really? You? And I have no problem being called chick. You'll have to try harder than that. Or I can pretend to be offended. Your choice.
-
And it's 'two weeks' from everywhere, not 20 miles. I can't believe I screwed up a quote from one of my favorite movies.
-
Are you talking about my "Peter without a peter" comment? Are you really mad about that? Really? Do you really not know what I meant by that? Really? You really do NOT know what I'm referring to and yet you are upset about it? HA! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Hilarious.
-
Same page on WW, man. Same page.
-
I was looking at the book again today and I wanted to reiterate that for the first time in a long time, this was a very smoothly flowing comic. It's just a really well put together first issue, a good introduction to a series. It tells you just about everything you need to know and it does it at a nice pace. I'm looking forward to this one and it's been a while since I was last excited about a Millar project. Nobody else but Douche picked this up?
-
I haven't seen anything about Spider-Men yet...I haven't read through all the comments above, so I've missed it. I'll go check out the whatnots. also, I wasn't trying to make you pretend to be offended, I was just referencing the beautifully awful UHF, starring Weird Al Yankovich, and the beautifully racist Michael Richards.
-
I took a quick peek, and it looks like one of the figures is ...Spider-Man. Am I missing something? I'll wait to see who the other Spider-Man is before making any judgements
-
March 29, 2012, 6:20 a.m. CST
Anyone else really enjoy this week's Avenging Spider-Man?
by Poptard_JD
LOOOVED it. it was a little silly sure, but as an art-nerd, it really tugged on my heart
-
...sorry, I'm typing randomly as I hurry to get ready for work!
-
BECAUSE shes the only girl who posts here. While shes being "sexually persecuted", she probably doesnt realize that everyone puts up with her absurd opinions and half baked theories because shes the only girl here and men are, after all, men. JoeN is socially inept and mentally impaired, but look back on his comments over the past 3 months, he has toned it down significantly. Yet people cant wait to call him out. Meanwhile, the only girl here is insulting people left and right, barely even discusses actual COMICS, and generally acting like a complete assclown, and no one says a word. It was long overdue for someone to point this out.
-
Is it good? They are getting ready to do a crossover with Punisher and DD, so I'm probably gonna have to buy the next few issues.
-
Everything hinges on the next issue. It could easily go in a "Ive seen it all before" direction, or it could turn out to be cool. I think the Praetorian is the hinge, actually. If he turns out to be some tweener middle ground character, that could actually be pretty cool.
-
March 29, 2012, 7:50 a.m. CST
"This fella could draw a manual on the most grotesque STD's and produce something amazing." ~Johnny Destructo
by Arafel
WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?!
-
1 DD, 1 Punisher and 1 Avenging Spider-Man which isn't too bad.
-
Really? That sucked. Forget the man-rape, it was just extremely slight, without much characterization or detail (look at how generic and uninspired all the art is). That was not good. Although Fialkov's certainly capable of doing great work, this ain't it.
-
Look, whichever interpretation you prefer, they were a society that rejected men. Period. They begin in a place of misanthropic absolutism. Whether they let their sperm-donors live or not. So that's enough right there to negate any concern about misogyny or "messaging". Would you care if a secret society of men who reject women completely were revealed to have exploited and killed the women they used for reproduction? Fuck no. Same thing.
-
OK, I want to weigh in on this. I don't want to get mired in continuity nits. Continuity and times change plain and simple. We live in a dark time of complete desensitization. The Internet has given us instant gratification in satisfying whatever we please whether sexual, violent or enlightening. Other mediums need to keep pace. Whatever the true roots of the character might be, to make an engaging story in our increasingly exponential capacity to get and absorb information, traditions must be broken. I followed Pink's link (there's a song in that) and the author makes excellent points. Azarello chose one facet of Amazon lore (if we take the author's words as gospel - but for the sake of argument let's do that) and amplified it for a modern audience. Where I deviate from teh author is I don't have a problem with it. But let's explore why I don't have a problem where many women might. It's easy to chalk things up to the misogyny of the male mind. Yes, at some fundamental level we all are. Unless of course you're eunuch. Why? Because it really all boils down to biology and the fact that suffrage and equality are a blip on the radar of human existence. Male fantasies of women are hard coded into our DNA, because that's what it took to make babies over the past tens of thousands of years of our existence. Even the author of Pink's link says that as far back as ancient times, men messed with the myth of Amazons, sometimes empowering them sometimes not so much. Again though, the only way to move past these things is to truly understand why men react in such ways. Mrs. Douche and I talk about this subject a lot. It's caused fights, but eventually through dialog we came to understanding. The Modern Man is basically in a no win situation. We are expected one minute to be rife with sensitivity and understanding, yet the next minute the embodiment of strength...virility...and take what we want attitude. Women I will say are feeling some pain from this as well. At the heart of our mating ritual lies animalistic-like desire. Our entire sex drive is an experience of the senses and very little emotion. Women are the flip side. Not to say a comely appearance isn't important, but it's not as important as it is for men. Look to the billion dollar cosmetic industry if you want to argue my theory. Is this all women? No. But billions of dollars are made off of the norm not the exceptions. Women want equality, but on the whole still want to be desired by men. And therein lies the rub, the logistics of mating and ultimately our sexual desires rely on men being in the power position. We are penetrating the woman plain and simple. To intrusively enter another requires power. It's physics. So before we burn Azzarello in effigy, he's doing the same thing men have done for generations. I actually think this issue was a bit of a male white flag saying, "You know what, I'm going to put the ladies in charge." It's not fun being viewed as the bully, is it?
-
I am such a considerate person. I don't know why some people always attack me. All I do is love comics... :(
-
The ad for #2 shows Praetorian drunk at a bar with a girl on each arm, so he's obviously crooked, or at least a "dark" hero, and will probably get in the way of the heist somehow.
-
I bought the first couple of Last of the Greats and was not impressed. I didn't even make it to the rape issue.
-
So why the hell did Millar even introduce the first hero at the beginning? He looks like the Praetorian, sounds like the Praetorian, has never reared his head again and won't in future issues. I'm still pissed at myself for the gaffe on identity, but I can hardly be blamed if everything but the freaking name is the same. (not saying you blame me Joen, just lamenting in general)
-
.....is paramount to avoiding adversarial debate. i believe in the 'everyone is an asshole theory' and i believe you either like on dislike any given person depending on if they are your 'kind' of asshole or not. <p> just to give you an example that has nothing to do with anything being discussed here: every monday through friday at 5:30 eastern standard time i stop whatever i'm doing and watch Pardon the Interruption. why? because i find Tony Kornheiser and Michael Wilbon hysterical. especially Tony Kornheiser. i think that fucking guy is funny as hell. but i know full well that there are people out there that hate T.K. in point of fact, i know some people who love sports talk shows who refuse to watch PTI because they find T.K. so unlikeable. and i can totally see where these people are coming from, i know full well that T.K. can be a asshole. but the thing is, i enjoy watching him because he is MY KIND of asshole. my personal bias plays a big part in my enjoyment of his show. i fully admit it and have made peace with that fact. <p> now, on the other hand, i have a hard time watching the sports talk show Around the Horn, even though i like the host (Tony Reali is the bomb yo!) and the format, i can't get over the fact that, more often than not, Woody Page is on the panel. and Woody Page annoys the shit out of me. he is NOT my kind of asshole. but i know people that think Woody is full of folksy charm and actually like him as a commentator. personally i think the guy is a tool, but again thats my own personal bias at work, i admit it and accept it. <p> now keeping all of that in mind, i personally would rather talk to a belligerent feminist over a socially inept dweeb any day of the week and twice on sundays. but again, that's just me, i'm fully in touch with my personal biases and have no problem admitting them. BUT......i don't think double standards or gender politics have anything to do with it. as i said, it's just a question of someone coming across as your personal kind of asshole or not. and yes, i do believe that my 'everyone is an asshole theory' could being peace to the middle east if everyone just accepted this theory as fact.
-
I think it was because the Gladiator was needed to stop a crime, while it may become apparent later that actually STOPPING crime is not really a concern of the Praetorian. Granted, that's all speculation on my part, and like I said: I hope they're on the same team because that would explain away the theme-bleed going on there, but in the meantime... it was a pretty good first issue, especially for Millar.
-
snore-zzzzzzzzz...snort! mmmurrmmma, whazzat? Huh?
-
Yeah, too many words spent on what boils down to "why can't we all get along."
-
You can talk about whatever you want. So, let's talk comics again... What are the predictions for the next DC title to get cancelled? I'm betting on JUSTICE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL.
-
Justice League Dark Animal Man Voodoo I would hope Justice LEague, but that comic is too big to fail, even though it should.
-
Captain atom
-
Animal Man won't be cancelled soon. Voodoo probably will be, though I LOVE that comic, its one of my favorites. Captain Atom is good, but also a likely cancel. Justice League International is a good choice. I vote for Blue Beetle I wish for Deathstroke
-
I agree with you that biology plays a role, contrary to what so-called gender deconstructionists would have you think. In other words, differences between 'male' and 'female' behavior aren't entirely constructed by society. And let's set the LGB exception aside for the sake of focus, and make this a hetero-centric argument at the moment. You state that men are in a no-win situation, and I can empathize with you to an extent. But what you're talking about seems like situational behavior judgments that come with simply being human. Let's look at the other side of the fence. Ye ol' ancient power dynamic of 'I give myself to you in love and partnership, and in return you accept the consequences' was the de facto standard between women and men. But 'consequences' doesn't simply mean just children. To a much larger extent, it encompasses the sum of our social value as desirable mates in society. The more years and sexual partners we have, the less value we have in a patriarchal view. When it comes to long-term relationships, single men more often than not gain 'market value' as they age. Intellect, maturity, financial security, friends and family typically will only increase. But society considers women only decreasing in 'market value' as they age, because of one aspect alone: the beauty of youth. The obsession of youth and beauty men have, and as a result society in general (which is largely driven and directed by men), fuels all that we do. This encompasses everything from the dating market to the job market, and studies have defined it. Just for a moment, imagine what that's like for someone who gets judged on their attractiveness alone, and is losing it by current society's standards each passing year. Or what if they never had 'it' to begin with? Can you wrap your head around that? It's true that men who look for sex and are attracted to youth and beauty are following a biological drive. But those who treat women as sex-objects instead of human beings, or disregard what women have to say, or dump their wife (who spent her youth on him) for someone younger and prettier aren't following a biological drive. They're just being an asshole. We live in a culture where 100% of the female bodies portrayed in media advertising are only found in 5% of the female population, and the vast statistical majority of rape, slavery, infanticide and domestic violence are inflicted on women. The concept of Wonder Woman and her supporting mythos was specifically born from feminist thought to counter that, as a story device to make girls and women feel empowered. Twisting that fact around, to turn a symbol of aspiration into that which it stood against, flies in the face of ugly reality. If it's not fun being viewed as a bully, then the answer is to stop bullying. Framing a victim as an aggressor may sooth a collectively inflamed, guilty male ego. But at symbolic cost that only makes things worse in the long run.
-
Stuff we want to see cancelled, or stuff we think will get cancelled, or stuff we don't want to see cancelled? More importantly (to me), what titles would you want to see replace those that are cancelled?
-
Don't disagree with a word you say Pink (maybe a few words, on the whole with you though) but again much of what you lament drives back to biology. Men remain sexually interested much longer than females because our bodies are wired to reproduce en mass. Women once they have either had children or their eggs are reaching the bottom of the basket start to have sex solely for pleasure with no biological "pressure" in place. Are men that leave their wives for a younger piece assholes? Yes. But part of that get up and go is biologically driven until the day we die. Hence my eunuch statement earlier. Now, what about the woman that has lost her looks or was never sexually attractive by social mores to start with? If you're into pity parties than the men without power, virility and all of those things should receive the same exact awwww from the beautiful people the beautiful people. They don't though. Those things are not deemed shallow in feminist circles and therefore no one gives a shit when the garbage man can't get laid, yet Oprah will have on every fugly femme from here to Des Moines decrying the imbalance of society. Now, here's the disagreement part. If Wonder Woman was meant to be a symbol of female empowerment because she's a smart and strong female, why does she have a waist that could snap in a strong wind and a Maybeline face?
-
Not what we want to be cancelled, what we think will realistically take a dive.
-
huh? Huh? Whazzat....zzzzzzzzzzzzz-snore...
-
but it WILL be canceled.
-
...it's not the same for the scrawny, pimple-faced nerdlings. Remember, they aren't hammered by the media every waking moment (proven fact) that the sum total of their value of their existence rests on whether or not they are considered wet-dream worthy. And as I pointed out, they're 'value' typically only gets better as they age, not worse. For what it's worth, I consider sex at it's very absolute best when all of society is blocked out, and everything there is about two people totally fades away, until there's nothing left but raw, wordless, never-ending, purely animalistic instinct. I feel like there's a certain truth in those moments that can't be put into words. But maybe it's just me. I think Captain Atom, Blue Beetle, Voodoo and I, Vampire are the worst for sales right now. I'm not sure which one is the 'best of the worst' sales-wise, though. Taking bets now on the WW thing being 'fixed' by involving something with lies, splinter faction extremists, or the sudden ret-con appearance of the Coda....
-
if you notice, I wrote a rave review of the ARTIST, not the writer. though to be fair, I do love me some dog turds. I'm looking forward to Pet Avengers 2: Electric Boogapoops.
-
People who enjoy things. Those people are JERKS.
-
I would think that would determine everything with the possible exception of a critically acclaimed book that DC would keep for the good pub. I keep hearing good things about Animal Man (and I'll check out the trade) so maybe it gets a pass based on that - I sometime suspect Vertigo books have a lower metric than say a superhero book. Does anyone get up to date sales data on books?
-
March 30, 2012, 2:18 p.m. CST
we're going to be interviewing the people behind the ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN CARTOON
by Poptard_JD
anyone have any real questions they'd like us to ask?
-
I can't wait for it, but do you feel like a complete jackass for including the stupid fucking motorcycles or do actually think they're a good idea? I even provided a lead-in for you.
Top Talkbacks
- Harry dives into STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS' spoilers to reveal the truth behind the blockbuster we're seeing! -- 1085 total posts 312 posts
- Has STAR WARS EPISODE VII Landed Its First Non-OT Cast Member? -- 266 total posts 266 posts
- John Ary's Video Review Of The New CAPTAIN AMERICA (1990) Blu-ray!! -- 165 total posts 165 posts
- STAR WARS REBELS Coming To Disney XD Fall 2014!! Chock Full-O-McQuarrie!?!? -- 162 total posts 162 posts
- Nordling Reviews STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS! Spoilers Abound! You Are Warned! -- 1301 total posts 160 posts
- Steven Seagal might be joining THE EXPENDABLES 3!! -- 136 total posts 136 posts
- Kurt Russell and Timothy Olyphant sign up to throw a BONE TOMAHAWK!!! -- 89 total posts 89 posts
- ‘Darkness Will Devour Them All!!’ Sunday Brings Antepenultimate GAME OF THRONES For HBO!! -- 300 total posts 82 posts
- Capone gets Extremis talking to actor James Badge Dale about IRON MAN 3, THE LONE RANGER and WORLD WAR Z!!! -- 50 total posts 50 posts
- Capone reviews STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS and considers the art of messing with canon and why it doesn't bother him!!! -- 588 total posts 49 posts