Logo

Cool News

PROMETHEUS Pics Hit EW, And They Are... Interesting?

Published at:  Nov 22, 2011 10:09:27 PM CST

Beaks here...

We know Entertainment Weekly is a haven for shitty photoshopping (remember that atrocious AVENGERS cover?), so let's not judge the above image too harshly. Going off the footage I saw at Comic Con, the film's lighting is far more muted (i.e. closer to the original ALIEN) than what we're seeing here. I understand why studios debut pictures in EW, but is the inevitable bad buzz worth it? I'm sure Vanity Fair would be thrilled to premiere something like this.

As should be obvious from the watermarks, Bloody-Disgusting has all of the pics, and they give us a basic sense of how Ridley's tweaked the ALIEN aesthetic (with an assist from H.R. Giger). That PROMETHEUS is more about discovering the origin of life on Earth - which then ties into the ALIEN universe somehow - is intriguing,  Despite the shitty quality of these images, I'm still very excited for this film.

PROMETHEUS hits theaters June 8th, 2012.



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:10:42 PM CST

    First!

    by surf ninja

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:11:04 PM CST

    First

    by cenobiteme

    Really stoked to see this!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:11:22 PM CST

    Looks interesting.

    by surf ninja

    Can't wait!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:21:02 PM CST

    I'm fucking in

    by pedrom

    give us a trailer already!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:22:22 PM CST

    Looking forward to this one. Not worried about the pics.

    by lonegun

    I expect the production design to be spectacular. I just hope the script is great. The characters need to be up to scratch, like the ones in the original ALIEN or in THE THING.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:23:03 PM CST

    Why do i get a LOST IN SPACE/MASS EFFECT vide?

    by killik

    and from organic,alien eggs we go to metalic,bullet-shaped boxes.sigh.BUT we got to "finally" learn what was with the derelict and the Jokey.yeah.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:23:19 PM CST

    PROMETHEUS pics hit... EW! Are they interesting?

    by margot_tenenbaum

    Eeeeeewwwwwwww

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:23:45 PM CST

    Teaser trailer is at this link....

    by ari_gold

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrfualW_UEw

    Reply to Talkback

  • But this looks pretty interesting. I'm a sucker for any "origin of life" themes, and Ridley Scott is one of the greats. So I expect this will be awesome regardless of whether it ties in to "Alien."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:28:47 PM CST

    a portion of the trailer leaked the other day...

    by neotokyo

    bloody disgusting had linked to it; not sure if the source has been pulled yet, though. you couldn't see much of anything, but it looked intriguing nonetheless. definitely looking forward to this one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:33:37 PM CST

    yes i saw the leaked bits

    by pedrom

    no sound, bad quality and all. Movie's due next year and outside of alien fandom, i dont think anyone knows about this production.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:33:55 PM CST

    FUCK THIS SHIT !!!

    by killik

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:33:55 PM CST

    ari_gold - Here's your fixed link...

    by darth_kong

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZ5TajZYW6Y

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:34:44 PM CST

    Hmmm. Yeah, I just don't know about this.

    by mr. nice gaius

    I mean...I love the cast but...no.

    Yeah...

    ...um...

    ...no.

    Hmmm...











    ...damn, I don't know.

    Reply to Talkback

  • ah,Hollywood with your big budget,"serious" genre movies.at least she will kick more ass than the token-chick from the Thing remake.right?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:50:03 PM CST

    that and the gay anal rape from Alien Harvest script

    by killik

    i wonder if the Space Jokey is going to start yelling:

    " Squeal like a pig. Weeeeeeee! "

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:54:27 PM CST

    Well, that’s certainly a large head.

    by franks_television

    So it’s got that going for it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:55:03 PM CST

    Way too clean.

    by sebastianhaff

    Everything these days is sanitized and squeaky clean. Pisses me off. In real life I'm something of a germophobe, but I'm a weird kid. Real life is dirty, and movies ought to reflect that more. Get some blood and dirt and grime on those actors' faces, stat. And dammit, why are they all baby faced youngsters? Can we get anyone in these major blockbusters who's old enough to grow some pubes? Fuck. This shouldn't be that difficult. Movies are hard enough to make as is, why fuck them up more with this WB horseshit?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:55:55 PM CST

    God created man in His own image..Genesis 1:27

    by gotilk

    And that image contained elements pasted from images culled from other films/promotional images.

    Wow, that's some bad photoshop in that top image. I know it's probably already been said 1000 times by now (but oddly not at bloody disgusting.... deleted comments? or just lower IQ at that site? which is it?) but that's some BAD bad photoshop.

    Still VERY MUCH looking forward to this, and obviously do not blame Scott or anyone in the production of the film itself.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 10:56:08 PM CST

    How are any of you NOT looking forward to this?

    by clabog592

    Ridley Scott returning to sci-fi is the stuff geek dreams are made of. The giant head alone should be enough to make everyone here excited. I mean, just look at how creepy and bizarre that is! Really really intriguing.

    And clearly, the photoshopped pictures aren't an accurate representation of what the actual film is going to look like. Everyone needs to stop being a cynic and actually think about how awesome it is that a movie like this is being made for us fans.

    My most anticipated movie release of 2012! Right after The Hobbit, of course.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:11:48 PM CST

    I wonder....

    by wormcheck44

    if it will be marketed at all as an ALIEN affiliate when the trailers start a coming???

    Reply to Talkback

  • So they have to put their own watermark on it? That's absurd.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:28:52 PM CST

    Others beat me to it re: Bloody Disgusting watermarking EW scans

    by wookie_weed

    It's as bad as AICN reporting on another website reporting on a magazine spread.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:31:40 PM CST

    Why is the cast so good-looking?

    by wookie_weed

    Seriously, look at the cast, they're all babes and hunks.

    It's the best thing about Alien... everyone looks like a normal person. Even Weaver in her underwear. I bet no one in Prometheus has a Dallas-beard, either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:32:48 PM CST

    Obviously it's an Alien prequel and a Stargate sequel

    by wookie_weed

    Guy Pearce plays Daniel Jackson's great grandson.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:33:37 PM CST

    Space Jockeys made humans. Space Jockeys also make aliens.

    by tallboy6t6

    There's your big mystery right there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • It'll make up for Alien 3, 4, and the Predator crossovers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:40:09 PM CST

    Small but valid point made over at BG

    by d o o d

    If this is set before the first Alien film, how comes the costumes are more advanced. Would've been nice to have the small details taken care of!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:43:35 PM CST

    beaks:

    by mentaldominance

    You saw the comic con trailer? And it was not colored like this?

    I thought these magazine pictures looked too stark as well.

    But then I thought - The grabs from the comic con trailer don't look that way.

    The new horrid leaked cel phone grab doesn't look that way.

    And then I remembered how Ridley said he will have to grit his teeth and film

    it too bright so that they can lower the brightness in post.

    So is it possible that these magazine pictures are simply pre post?

    Maybe this is how they lit it originally before it gets graded?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:47:25 PM CST

    Abe Sapien rebreathers

    by moosemalloy

    -- just kidding, it's going to be great.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:49:17 PM CST

    And yes the top image especially looks Photoshopped!

    by mentaldominance

    Look at Fassbender's head - look at all their heads.

    The shit looks doctored.

    IF SO, WHY?

    And why would Ridley let them do it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Whereas that EW pic seems to have 'shopped 8x10 promo headshots on spacesuits.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2011 11:52:26 PM CST

    I have no idea what I'm looking at.....

    by notcher

    And I love it. Well, not the first image which looks horribly amateur, but the other pics look sweet. Can't wait for a trailer of any kind on this one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nostromo was like an old beat-up truck with low-income blue collar workers behind the wheel. Prometheus is probably the cream of the crop, the jewel of the fleet and the best ship that money (and Weyland) can buy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:13:14 AM CST

    That movie will be better than A3,A4 but it is no way

    by killik

    going to be better than A1,A2.FACT.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:15:23 AM CST

    lostboytexasshole

    by rhuragh

    Oh fuck. Are you kidding? Shit fuck son of a bitch. You aren't kidding. How the fuck did Lindelof get involved in this? FUCK. Now he's going to fuck up Aliens too? Fuuuuuuccccccccckkkk.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:26:33 AM CST

    Scott said fans of the original Alien are...

    by barrock

    Really going to be happy with the last 15 minutes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:31:27 AM CST

    lol it looks like Fassbender's head's about to fall off.

    by wookie_weed

    The Communist Party of China doctors better fake propaganda photographs than EW, and they do it with 1960s Soviet technology.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:38:38 AM CST

    PG-13 or R... have they decided yet?

    by wookie_weed

    Ridley Scott admitted at Comic-Con he's shooting for both ratings. I mean seriously, if they go with the PG-13 version, they may as well stop working on the film and destroy everything with fire.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:41:48 AM CST

    LOVES Alien, Love Ridley Scott BUT

    by roarsloudly

    This movie has me worried. REALLY worried. Hopefully it is a great film because just good WON'T be good enough.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:42:57 AM CST

    Here we go, Ridley admitting he's filming PG-13

    by wookie_weed

    http://bit.ly/tpVQZV

    He also said at Comic-Con he's still shooting scenes for an R-rating version, but everything he said sounds like FOX is pushing for the PG-13.

    Alien and Aliens were both R. All the other films were R, except for Anderson's critically acclaimed AvP.

    If Prometheus is PG-13, what terrible fucking waste.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:43:30 AM CST

    Looks like it's designed to resemble Jim Burns's art.

    by dennis_moore

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:46:40 AM CST

    If Prometheus is PG-13, they should set it on a farm

    by wookie_weed

    Where an old guy keeps the aliens in a barn. It'll be awesome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:48:48 AM CST

    =Really going to be happy with the last 15 minutes.=

    by killik

    let me guess.an alien bursts from the Jokey's chest while piloting the alien spaceship with the eggs,then the alien spaceship crash lands in LV426 and the warning beacon starts emitting.

    And all that thanx to the heroic female protagonist who saves our planet by breaking an egg and letting loose a facehugger in the spaceship.She also informs the Company about the location of the crash landed ship,which explains how the Company knew about the derelict and the alien in the first Alien movie.


    That spaceship was traveling towards Earth with the purpose to drop all those eggs there so that they could infect the human population and annihilate it in a matter of days.

    You see the Jokers had created the humans but they also had created the aliens.and seeing how pathetic and weak the humans turned out to be (or an evolving threat to them) ,they decided to eradicate them and replace them with the perfect killing machines: the aliens.

    yeah.and Deckard is a replicant.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:52:38 AM CST

    I agree with @wookie_weed - everyone's too pretty.

    by kevred

    Everyone, in both pics, and no one more so than Theron. Come on, Scott, don't tell us you've whiffed on that basic rule. Don't give us something pretty and empty.

    If Scott hadn't been making crap for so long - and I include Gladiator in that, a deeply stupid, cliched wreck - I'd be more optimistic about this. I hope I'm wrong and that revisiting this material is bringing a new (old) level of inspiration. I would love for this to be a slice of movie magic that dazzles me.

    But look at movie history. Realistically, what are the odds that going back to Alien & Blade Runner-ville are going to produce anything of value? Very, very low. We've been burned too many times.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:53:04 AM CST

    Will the last 15 minutes be R?

    by wookie_weed

    That may be what Ridley's saying when he says Alien fans will be happy with the last 15 minutes. Anyone under the age of 15 will have to leave the cinema when the last 15 minutes begins.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:57:45 AM CST

    Did R hurt Alien and Aliens?

    by wookie_weed

    Nope, huge box office hits.

    So what the fuck is FOX smoking to want a PG-13 Prometheus?

    Ridley Scott filming two ratings at the same time just doesn't bode well. It's either 100% one way, or no filming at all. And I'm sure as hell not waiting for an R-rated Bluray -- give us an R-rated Prometheus in cinemas, Ridley.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:00:21 AM CST

    @kevred, I'm more worried about the PG-13...

    by wookie_weed

    lol, like i haven't posted about it. :-P

    Yeah, the good-looking cast doesn't do it for me. Alien felt like I was watching real people in space -- the Prometheus cast makes me feel like I'm watching good-looking actors playing make-believe. That's a big problem.

    Shit, I sound like a hater, which i'm not. I'm still looking forward to Prometheus, and I'm hoping it brings back the magic of Alien. I've just got major worries at the way FOX is getting their way -- reminds me of Alien 3.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:01:45 AM CST

    About the Bloody Disgusting Watermarks

    by red_cloak

    This is how it works, people; the watermarks show you that BD got the scoop early, even if they're only magazine scans. People will be now aware that BD is fast to get interesting news, which should increase their profile and in theory their traffic. It makes sense, right?

    The pics look good, more colourful and not as 'realistic' as Alien, but still, promising.

    Reply to Talkback

  • ... I think you're good-looking! But you know what I mean about Prometheus's good-looking cast. ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:03:28 AM CST

    PROMETHEUS IS GOING TO BE PG-13?!?!?!?!?!?

    by killik

    BWAHAHAHAHAHA.

    pg-13,young studs in the cast,a token-female who looks like she came out from a beauty shop,the clean,sterilized environment,space suits which are too advanced for the sole purpose to look cool and so on.

    Prometheus = Thing remake.the difference is that the original creators are involved in this project.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:05:56 AM CST

    Harry Dean Stanton's face has character ;-)

    by wookie_weed

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:06:51 AM CST

    I'd never tell him that in person though

    by wookie_weed

  • The evil queen in that snow white movie, a corporate bitch in prometheus... something her agent isn't telling her?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:12:54 AM CST

    PG-13 Aliens

    by wookie_weed

    "Get away from her you... monster!"

    Not to mention Hudson wouldn't speak a single word, and Bishop would be torn apart out of sight in a cupboard like C3-PO in Empire Strikes Back.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:17:56 AM CST

    DreadCentral released the pics online first

    by prometheusnews

    (not BD) http://www.PrometheusNews.net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:19:05 AM CST

    www.PrometheusNews.net

    by prometheusnews

    btw for the latest news and updates on Prometheus, visit http://www.PrometheusNews.net

    --V

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:22:31 AM CST

    those are promotional pics

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    and they look great...everyone needs to ditch their aintitcool fanboy cynicism...your membership won't be revoked...you don't have to hate everything

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:23:47 AM CST

    www.PrometheusNews.net

    by prometheusnews

    Then why do they deserved to be watermarked?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:27:25 AM CST

    PrometheusNews dot NET

    by prometheusnews

    I liked the Phantom Menace :)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:31:16 AM CST

    Boobs

    by prometheusnews

    I like em

    www.PrometheusNews.net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:32:03 AM CST

    What do you want to know? darthkong

    by prometheusnews

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:33:54 AM CST

    Beaks... Would You Like Some Whine With Your...?

    by mako

    You sound like a cry baby. First... AICN repo's the pics that Bloody Disgusting put up first... then goes on to complain about the quality of the images.

    Too bad 20th Century just didn't hand you guys over your own amazing images. Boo hoo. It's as if AICN is a second rate wanna be film site that wishes it could have it's own nice and clean images - but instead has to grab scanned images from a magazine to look like they are cool.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:34:34 AM CST

    How they look, think about it.

    by keith maniac

    I think you've got to keep in mind that the crew of the Nostromo were, blue collar, wage jockeys, who had long since got over the novelty of space travel, dressed in utility clothes doing a boring job. These characters, from what has been released, are professional scientists on a no doubt generously funded mission, back at the beginning of outer space exploration.
    I think the difference in the appearance between them and the crew of the Nostromo is 100% intentional, if you think about it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • www.PrometheusNews.net

    Reply to Talkback

  • www.PrometheusNews.net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:40:28 AM CST

    these are all posed promo shots

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    none of these are from footage...they are designed for EW...so relax with the negativity...wait till the teaser...then judge...how many true footage grabs have you all ever seen in Entertainment Weekly?? I've yet to see one

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:43:52 AM CST

    Absolutely.

    by prometheusnews

    Actually don't know where the bitchin is coming from. I haven't analyzed the photos too much myself

    >> PrometheusNews dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:52:44 AM CST

    I think they all look amazing

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    lots of negativity...except we always hear about how 3D films are too dark...yet these pics seem too bright to a lot of people...maybe Ridley realized the 3D darkness issues and shot everything a stop or 2 brighter?? honestly...you can knock Ridley for plot points but has he ever delivered a bad looking film?? NOPE!!! so quit whining about the look because everything he shoots ends up looking perfect

    Reply to Talkback

  • If you want to see said cam images, go to my site and hit "GALLERY"

    >> www.PrometheusNews.net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:58:25 AM CST

    prometheusnews...aka Viscal

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    we get it bro...you've been tagging your site everywhere...we all know about it...relax

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:58:29 AM CST

    Needs more space penises.

    by mr_voodoo_potato_head

    Get with it, Giger.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:06:38 AM CST

    PrometheusNews dot Net

    by prometheusnews

    PrometheusNews dot Net hurrah

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:09:06 AM CST

    where is asi...I want his reaction to this

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    even though these pics are not at all what the film will look like...still a good indication of design...so someone get that Portuguese maniac here STAT!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:11:48 AM CST

    OK I'll stop

    by prometheusnews

    Any questions regarding this movie or the Alien film franchise?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:11:52 AM CST

    prometheusnews - You just put the PIN in the PARTY-HOG.

    by darth_kong

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:14:03 AM CST

    Better than the Theatrical Release, surely.

    by prometheusnews

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:14:51 AM CST

    prometheusnews

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    how come you only have 3 comments on your reporting of this EW story??

    Reply to Talkback

  • http://www.networksolutions.com/whois-search/prometheusnews.net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:18:51 AM CST

    But we know are stuff. FACT

    by prometheusnews

    Hicks and Newt shouldn't have died, imo.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:20:32 AM CST

    "our" stuff...and yeah I was just giving you shit

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:21:50 AM CST

    I said I'll stop. But you guys brought up the site

    by prometheusnews

    this site >>> PrometheusNews dot Net

    :P

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:21:54 AM CST

    Hicks and Newt were nonsense characters

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    especially Newt...most people who complain about Newt dying hated her in Aliens...thought she was just another annoying child actor...mostly

    Reply to Talkback

  • this site >>> PrometheusNews dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:23:34 AM CST

    Viscal you're such a cunt

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    a self-promoting unapologetic cunt...but a cunt regardless

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:24:05 AM CST

    Word

    by prometheusnews

    >>> PrometheusNews dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:27:19 AM CST

    HAHA ok

    by prometheusnews

    yes A3 was a mess. But come one now

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:27:42 AM CST

    Hey Killik The 1st shot screams Mass effect.

    by phategod2

    glad to know its not just me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:28:03 AM CST

    lol, those pics are fucking terrible ...

    by ginge_muppet

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:28:04 AM CST

    Come on now

    by prometheusnews

    this site >>> PrometheusNews dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:28:59 AM CST

    disagree kong

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    Alien 3 actually took some chances and got back to the feeling of the original...the entire Ripley story is about how she can never be happy...how her entire life is defined by the creature and she can never escape it...the Alien trilogy is the antithesis of most trilogies...where the first and third parts are more uplifting and the second part is dark...the Alien trilogy reversed that trend and I love that it did

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:30:25 AM CST

    THEY ARE PROMO STILLS!!

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    christ sake...these are not screen grabs...they are staged glossy shots for a mag...and the sets look great

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:31:27 AM CST

    Raskolnikov... not that it was deliberate

    by prometheusnews

    ...Not deliberately planned out that way. The studio just rolled with whatever thought worked at the time. It's not like say how George Lucas plans his trilogies out from the get go.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:34:27 AM CST

    raskolnikov_was_framed

    by darth_kong

    Look. What's a shame is that Alien 3 didn't take more chances.

    It comes across as Vanilla Yogurt to me.

    There's nothing wrong with Vanilla Yogurt its just there.

    I wanted a different Alien 3.

    David Fincher should have passed on Alien 3 and he couldn't because of what it meant to his career.

    He's no Science Fiction Genius by any means. I do LOVE ME SOME FIGHT CLUB though.

    It's still Vanilla Yogurt to me.

    But, I respect your view.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:37:12 AM CST

    H.R. Giger wasn't involved...

    by godoffireinhell

    ...or rather his sole involvement was having a chat with Scott about the film. He will be credited as a "consultant". He didn't actually design a single fucking thing and that huge head should be a dead giveaway. It's a male head. Giger would never allow a male head! It's sacrilege!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:39:06 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by raskolnikov_was_framed

    I actually think Alien 3 was a nobel failure...I think Fincher did a lot right...the rod puppet green screen was a terrible idea...but there were many great performances and it was beautifully shot...the DC was definitely a step up with the whole freeing the Alien storyline...also what I think is the biggest monday morning QB failure is that Resurrection was originally offered to Danny Boyle and he turned it down...how great would this franchise be if the directors were Scott, Cameron, Fincher, and Boyle?? holy shit...Jean Pierre Jeunet is a talented guy...but totally unfit for this universe

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:39:48 AM CST

    darthkong >> OK

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    PrometheusNews dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:43:01 AM CST

    RE: H.R. Giger wasn't involved...

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/41532/hr-giger-board-alien-prequels

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:50:22 AM CST

    This AICN page is missing a pic (should be 3 pics)

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    3rd pic has Charlize and Idris Elba

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:50:28 AM CST

    raskolnikov_was_framed

    by darth_kong

    It's all that French Lumiere Slap-Stick comedy with Jeunet that ruined Resurrection for me.

    It was like watching an Alien movie through a Nickelodeon.

    Did you ever read one of the earliest drafts of Alien Resurrection where at the end of the script I think it's Ripley or Call fights the Newborn on earth with a Harvester that was in the cargo hold of the Betty?

    They basically land on earth and the ending is more similar to the ending of ALIENS. The Newborn was even described as being way different than the TRANS-GENDER creature that Gillis and Woodruff designed/built.

    Not saying that this ending would have saved Alien Resurrection, it definitely would have cost more, but anything would have been better that flushing the newborn out a window toilet-bowl abortion style which I'm sure was metaphorically done on purpose.

    But yeah, Danny Boyle might have been a better choice.

    Because there are some designs in Alien Resurrection that I hate.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:50:49 AM CST

    What the hell is John Shepard doing there?

    by crooooooow

    Is there going to be a Mass Effect 3 tie in?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:51:44 AM CST

    Yeah, Mass Effect. We get it

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:54:59 AM CST

    I think there is a new site called PrometheusNews

    by barryknowles

    Don't ask me how I know. I just do somehow.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:58:24 AM CST

    Say that a few more times in the exact wat as you just said it, and I'll try it

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    >> Prometheus News dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:58:37 AM CST

    way

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

  • Jesus Harold P. Esquire Christ. I'm being punished for being a Prometheus fan. This ain't fucking Beetlejuice. You say it THREE TIMES.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:07:12 AM CST

    I thought

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    Tim Tebow was the second coming.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:09:55 AM CST

    Sure. See you there.

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:10:49 AM CST

    AlienPrequelNews dot Com

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:16:07 AM CST

    Evangelists must be shaking their heads...

    by marineboy

    ...again. Poor sods, no-one believes in their story anymore.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:28:25 AM CST

    A 2-year old site VS a 3-week old site. See you soon.

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    >> Prometheus News dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:30:29 AM CST

    Have to sleep. Leave a note here:

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1446714/board/flat/191435643


    >> Prometheus News dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:37:16 AM CST

    margottenenbaumhatescats dot co dot uk dot biz

    by margot_tenenbaum

    Up to date news on Andrew Lloyd Webber's CATS direct-to-blu-ray prequel, the tie-in CG anime series and 3d video game produced by James Cameron and Martin Scorsese. I've seen the game and...I've fallen in madly, deeply and unreasonably love with it, and I hate CATS.

    My hate for CATS shouldn't prevent you from liking CATS on Facebook! facebook.com/ifuckinghatecatsfuckyouallpleaseclicklikeforihatecatsatfacebookdotcom

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:53:11 AM CST

    Ahh, Earth to margot_tenenbaum?

    by darth_kong

    Thank you for sharing that sweetie.

    You are a BRIGHT SHINY STAR! ;)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 4:11:54 AM CST

    The main pic with Rapace, Fassbender etc

    by kwisatzhaderach

    is clearly a promo pic taken on set, not a still from the film. Relax everybody.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 4:55:31 AM CST

    Gotta be sexy for Hollywood...

    by evilnerd

    I really miss those Alien Cast types. Real people in "real" Situations. Those days are long gone.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 5:38:43 AM CST

    WHY don't studios theatrically release

    by tbyitbsitbh

    both R and PG-13 cuts of a movie when, as in this case, both are being made? Surely some cinemas would be happy to have (late-night?) screenings of the R version, and then we don't have to see a gimped version first and wait forever for the DVD...er, blu-ray. How hard is that?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:05:33 AM CST

    the prequel technology effect hits again

    by bouncy x

    those spacesuits look awefully modern compared to the ones in Alien which takes place after it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:20:50 AM CST

    one way to look at the more advanced tech

    by wookie_weed

    is that the crew of the prometheus get the very best weyland-yutani has in its r&d department. plus all the good looking people.

    the crew of the nostromo were just looking after a mining vessel. they were truckers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:28:51 AM CST

    but..

    by li75

    man invented god then wrote about how he somehow exists yet we have never seen proof.

    (Its all bollocks)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:32:04 AM CST

    PG-13? Pass.

    by volllllume3

    You used to be the man Ridley? What happened.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:32:28 AM CST

    SCOOP! - Ripleys in Promethues!

    by cartmanez.

    http://leckerhamster.deviantart.com/art/Prometheus-270467841

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:40:07 AM CST

    Wow.

    by burndowntinseltown

    I'm so......underwhelmed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:45:08 AM CST

    Space jockey's??

    by mark31

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:45:33 AM CST

    darth_kong, HOLY SHIT! A GIANT HEAD!

    by lv_426

    Finally some Prometheus stuff to really sink our teeth into until there is a nice high-res trailer to drool over.

    I am going to have to sleep on all this, cause I can't process much of a thought, but let me say, that giant human head statue is very cool looking and definitely Giger-esque. Yes, I know Giger himself might not have designed the head but it looks close enough to me.

    Also, those things we saw a while back, that the astronauts are standing amongst... the "urns" as they were referred to back a few months ago in those other leaked pics, I wonder if those hold humans in some suspended state of slumber?

    Maybe humans not yet fully grown, but not tiny fetuses either?

    Ahh, who knows, my brain is melting..... :)

    Reply to Talkback

  • People who complain about Newt dying wanted her to survive so that she could spend some quality time in a prison full of paedos, rapists and murderers.

    Some people are just weird, I guess.

    Reply to Talkback

  • http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/the-fien-print/posts/wondercon-2009-terminator-salvation-rating-hinging-on-moon-bloodgood-s-nudity

    similar thing happened with T4 - apparently it was undecided about PG13 or R then we got that pizza hut ad with the little [PG-13] at the bottom left

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:52:55 AM CST

    raskolnikov_was_framed , ALIEN RESURRECTION

    by lv_426

    "Jean Pierre Jeunet is a talented guy...but totally unfit for this universe."

    I feel the same way.

    What a wasted opportunity for something grander. I mean for fuck's sake, at its core Alien Resurrection was basically:

    The Fly + Frankenstein + The Poseidon Adventure in space with Aliens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Jean Pierre Jeunet is too eccentric to really have done what was needed. Basically as Alien 3 was going for the creeping sense of dread vibe of the original Alien, it was apparent that Resurrection should have echoed the action-packed mixed with horror and adrenaline pumping thrills vibe of Aliens.

    Also, Alien Resurrection just kind of hangs there for no reason. As controversial and flawed as Alien 3 was, at least it had a point. Ripley dying so as to prevent Weyland Yutani from getting an alien specimen for the bio-weapons division. Alien Resurrection, with the new weird Ripley 8 seemed like it was the start of a new Alien trilogy, which is what should have happened instead of AvP.

    Reply to Talkback

  • The officers on board a modern naval vessel have nicer-looking uniforms than guys working on an oil rig or a fishing trawler. That doesn't mean they're somehow anachronistic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:07:17 AM CST

    This film is going to hug face & suck balls. NEXT!

    by sigourneyweavers3dbeaver

  • Although, I do prefer the clunky bulkier ones that were worn by the Nostromo crew in ALIEN.

    The whole sleek non-NASA-ish spacesuit has been done a lot more recently. Big and bulky and battered but functional like in ALIEN looks cooler and more believable to me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:10:11 AM CST

    Alien Prequel

    by mastes360

    The guy who leaked the 19 seconds of the trailer says that the trailer starts with a shot of Ripley from ALIEN with the words "what if the beginning was not the beginning".
    So it seems the film is a prequel whether the producers will admit it or not.

    Reply to Talkback

  • they are also are less bulky thus more flexible and comfortable,lighter and easier to wear and move around,more ergonomic with those placed lights in the chest and in the neck.They dont even look like spacesuits.

    And you are wrong when you say that the crew in Alien were simply truckers.That is a very degrading generalization.You had a captain,officers,a doctor,a scientist,etc.And they were operating an expensive spaceship with a very valuable cargo.Which means that they were trained and skilled to do this kind of a job.They were important assets for the Company,because they did a very important job for them.

    I am not saying that the Nostromo crew should have state of the art equipment but simple truckers,they were not.

    Reply to Talkback

  • The brilliance of Alien and Aliens, and one of the things that was ignored in Alien 3 and Resurrection, was the whole blue collar average man/woman out there in the void of space fighting for their lives against the aliens. There were no galactic overlords, space princesses, dashing space pirates, or womanizing starship captains like in Star Trek, Star Wars, Battlestar Galactica, etc. Alien and Aliens had that extra layer of believability because of the fact that the people we got to watch try and kill the alien(s) looked and acted like normal everyday people that just happened to have extraordinary jobs.

    Even the marines in Aliens fit with this notion pretty well I'd say, which meant that they were characters that we could root for. The prisoners in Alien 3, while certainly still people who did hard work in a harsh environment with few handouts, were hard to relate to because they were not only somewhat indistinguishable for some of the audience with their bald heads and brown coats. There was also the sense that we the audience had to really push aside the notion that they are prisoners, rapists and murderers at that, to be able to root for them.

    Before that though, we had hard working class people in Alien, and in Aliens the blue collar colonists and marines.

    Alien Resurrection just sort of got into silly territory with the mad scientists, Ripley clone, and space pirates.

    Reply to Talkback

  • The Company Science Team are wearing Breast-Plates with the logo similar to the Nostromo "wings" logo and some type of logo that looks like a rising sun?

    The Breast-Plates remind me of the Breastplate of Aaron vaguely connected to the twelve signs of the Zodiac except they didn't use twelve jewels. They just put logos on them?

    The Giant Head in the room suggests a "temple" motif.

    Where are you temples?

    There on your HEAD.

    The reason I say this is because the TWO CURVED PILLARS in front of the HEAD look similar to the Pillars of Hercules or the Masonic pillars Jachin and Boaz connected to the Temple of King Solomon.

    There was other pictures online that showed the two CURVED PILLARS as well. There out there.

    The design layout, schematics if you will, of the Temple of King Solomon was a physical representation of the SEX ACT. Simply meaning to GENERATE which is what the "G" in Freemasonry stands for.

    I mean, I'm assuming that the URNS or AMPULES contain DNA or GENETIC MATERIAL, I would imagine in the film they somehow generate BIOMECHANOID LIFE.

    The whole design feels very subtlety occult in nature.

    I mean if PROMETHEUS deals with GODS that's what I see in the design.

    Oh yeah the SUN.

    Supposedly the voiceover in the LEAKED TRAILER talks about the SUN and there looks like there was a shot of a SERPENT LIKE BIOMECHANOID.

    The symbol of the SNAKE in ANCIENT CULTURES represents FIVE things and one of them was the SUN.


    Lucifer/Light-bearer - SNAKE

    Wisdom - SNAKE

    Sun Worship/Energy - SNAKE

    Kundalini Force/Fire - SNAKE

    Regenerative Principle/Sex Worship - SNAKE



    The Five symbols that are connected to the SNAKE symbol are all INTERLOCKING and interchangeable of coarse.

    So yeah, it's weird. The whole design feels really OCCULTISH.

    So how does the SUN fit into all this along with the PROMETHEAN FIRE?

    I really LOVE IT.


    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:46:55 AM CST

    Ancient Aliens, the movie!!!!!!!!!!

    by alienindisguise

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:50:21 AM CST

    reminds me of DARK CITY

    by cartmanez.

    http://www.filmcritic.com/assets_c/2010/02/Dark-City-thumb-560xauto-23724.jpg

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:51:14 AM CST

    PG-13

    by chilli mcfreeze

    To be honest I'd say that the original Alien isn't 'R' rated by today's standards, so you could still get a damn fine movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:55:03 AM CST

    Darth_Kong

    by sigourneyweavers3dbeaver

    Thays all good & well, but the idea of a genetically engineered, bio-mechanical weapon sucks. I much preferred the idea that the Alien...WAS A FUCKING ALIEN. That's the point. And it's (peoduction) design was so believable, it made for the best thought-out horror of the late 20th Century.

    Ridley's stripping its mystique away.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:58:05 AM CST

    ALIEN would be rated R ffs!

    by mastes360

    The chestburster, no need to say more. Both the engineers get there heads impolded and all thats not even taking into acount the sheer terror atmosphere that the film has like Dallas when he's in the air ducts, you don't see any blood or anything but the sheer terror that scene invokes would NOT be shown in a PG13 movie.
    I honestly hate it when people stick up for companys like FOX, there is no way this film should be PG13.

    Reply to Talkback

  • I pretty much feel the same way.

    Both Alien 3 and Resurrection feel like they are WANTING to be more than they are.

    Something feels MISSING from both movies. Like they are not totally complete or fleshed-out.

    As far as Fincher is concerned I think he makes great movies about PEOPLE WHO ARE INTROVERTS or SHUT-INS.

    David Fincher never got the character of Ripley.

    He likes his Fight Club characters and Social Network characters.

    I don't see them in an Alien Universe but hey, what do I know.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:07:55 AM CST

    the silly 'A L I E N would a PG 13 today' argument

    by cartmanez.

    even if you edited out the obvious R rated material (chest burster, the F bombs, Brett/Lambert/Park deaths) you would still be left with an R rated film due to the overbearing sense of dread, eerieness, intensity, dark subject matter, the pace, the horrific Giger designs (remember time and numeurous sequels has lessend the horrificness of the Alien/face hugger/derelict designs...those things were terrifying to audiences whod never seen them before)

    Reply to Talkback

  • but ALIEN all the more as that (and The Thing) is the most Horror orientated of all the late 70s/80s) SF chillers

    funny how Alien, Terminator and Predator all started out as hard SF Horror films yet all eventually got diluted to SF Action PG13

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:15:19 AM CST

    sigourneyweavers3dbeaver - CALL ME THE FOOL BUT I BET...

    by darth_kong

    Ridley NEVER shows us where the Space Jockeys or Engineers come from.

    That would be my guess.

    That MYSTIQUE will probably be left in the movie.

    And not so much from WHERE but from WHEN?

    Do they come from another dimension or universe or BRANE like in String Theory or M-theory?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:18:56 AM CST

    There's not nearly enough hate on this thread

    by proevad

    for these horrible fucking pictures. This site has gone to shit. This looks awful. Like a goddamn Stargate sequel (which sucked btw).

    Reply to Talkback

  • And they influenced Alien and Blade Runner.

    I think it's gonna be fun.

    The OCCULT symbolism alone should have you excited.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:25:37 AM CST

    Those space-jumpsuits are Star Trek: Enterprise bad!

    by has_snyder_been_fired_from_superman_yet

    Also, everything looks too clean, what happened with the working class spaceship from Alien? Did they have to forego all the grunge in order to match the look of all the CGI? (CGI doesn't do grunge and dirt very well)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:32:30 AM CST

    To be fair....

    by mastes360

    Most of those shots are production stills, no way will the actuall film look as clean and clear as thos shots.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:36:06 AM CST

    Lambert death

    by mastes360

    Yeah i forgot about that one. The terrifying music while seeing the aliens tail slowly rise up between her legs then cut away to the sound of her being raped then gutted over the tannoy, no way in hell would you get that in a PG13 film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:38:03 AM CST

    Mike Fassbender looks like an android

    by proevad

    anyway--or Jeremy Irons. Eat a sammich dude.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:47:25 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by proevad

    Stop giving away Masonic secrets. We know where you live.

    Reply to Talkback

  • whiny assed titty babies.

    Somehow this has become a new thing to do for people who don't like to think for themselves. Sad, sorry mofos, the lot of ya.

    Decided by The ratings decisions always seem arbitrary and inconsistent from film to film anyway. R does not = better, dopes. Fucking hell, 2001 was rated G!!!!!!!!!

    Those who complain about ratings just ooze stupidity, right up there with idiots who gauge a film's success not on the film, but how much it made.

    What a bunch of pathetic, zombified automatons programmed to puke up the same internet blather, over and over.

    Does the story sound like it sucks, not to me, but that seems like a valid point to ponder, that is, if we knew the story, instead of just a few details.

    And all this ridiculous negative speculation based on a few photos and story details. But, I guess that is fun for some of you - guess wrongly about the entire film, deem it unworthy, stamp your feet and proclaim-- pass.

    Infantile behavior.

    You guys just suck all the fun out of anticipation for films.

    But have fun being the same babies, over and over!!!!











    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:04:36 AM CST

    sigourneyweavers3dbeaver

    by mcgootoo

    Ridley's stripping its mystique away.

    Really? You've seen the film?

    Since you know, and disapprove, don'r see it.

    Whiny speculation does nothing but make you sound like a silly naysayer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:11:57 AM CST

    sigourneyweavers3dbeaver

    by kwisatzhaderach

    Stop talking ass. In the last 20 years Ridley made 1492, White Squall, Gladiator, Black Hawk Down, Matchstick Men, Kingdom of Heaven, American Gangster, Body of Lies, Robin Hood... all of these films are at least good and at best excellent. The people who talk ass on the internet about Ridley Scott not making a 'decent' film in years have obviously not seen anything he;s made since 1992. Idiots.



    OK, so G.I. Jane and Hannibal were not good, but that's still a pretty good hit rate over 20 years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:12:03 AM CST

    Mario Bava

    by mcgootoo

    Hope his influence is on this film too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:12:15 AM CST

    proevad - I'll let David Lynch speak on my behalf...

    by darth_kong

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4wh_mc8hRE

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:22:20 AM CST

    The face looks like Brando.

    by thewrathofsean

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:23:11 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by mcgootoo

    I like your form of speculation - I can tell you really want to see this!!!!

    Cool, me too!!


    It holds much promise for another superb deep space with big ideas.



    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:24:36 AM CST

    That's it. I'm avoiding ALL future Prometheus news

    by d.vader

    I don't want to know how the Aliens are involved, and inevitably, someone is going to spoil it for me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:30:50 AM CST

    hatedperson

    by mcgootoo

    You are a useless bore, as usual.

    Fuck censorship. I hate censorship.

    I love well told tales. A film's rating does not rule my predilections.

    You are just a silly little nothing.

    Moo.


    Reply to Talkback

  • some WTF promo stills.

    Who would have thought the dark and dread-filled and brilliant Alien could be represented by a photo of seven people in pajamas and jackets looking off 'fearfully' to camera right? Well... http://tinyurl.com/d9kobb8

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:49:25 AM CST

    Yea Fassbender looks skinny as hell..

    by openthepodbaydoorshal

    ..is he going the John Hurt route?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:54:17 AM CST

    When someone walks into a room and yells HEY ASSHOLE...

    by mcgootoo

    hatedperson is the only one who turns around...

    because he knows himself vey well.

    He only exists as long as I respond... so.. see ya....dope no more table scraps for you.

    Moo.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 10:03:58 AM CST

    There isn't a chance in hell this will be rated R.

    by m6y

    They don't release big movies like this anymore with huge box office potential unless they're PG-13 or lower. It's purely a marketing decision and the correct one in that regard.

    Look, I'm the biggest fan of Alien and Aliens I know and I wish Prometheus was gonna be R, but IMHO I think they can pull this off as a PG-13. You can get away with quite a bit in a PG/PG-13 movie. I mean, The Lord of the Rings movies are filled with gore. The Jurassic Park movies have quite a bit of scary stuff and gore (even if it's brief).

    The classic example of this for me is: Raiders of the Lost Ark. Raiders was rated PG when it came out! I remember seeing it when I was a kid and thinking: how in the hell is this rated PG? I loved it of course, but the list of violent stuff in that film is long (including Indy shooting people in the head, etc.)

    Again, I wish Prometheus was gonna be rated R, but if they're clever with it I think they can push hard against the limits of a PG-13 rating and it still be an effective Alien movie. We'll see. But it will be rated PG-13.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 10:07:26 AM CST

    m6y - I can't believe how nasty American Dad and Family Guy are.

    by darth_kong

  • Nov 23, 2011 10:12:58 AM CST

    hatedperson is making Private Hudson look like Julie Andrews too.

    by darth_kong

  • Nov 23, 2011 10:18:35 AM CST

    Not (only) too clean...TOO TIGHT!

    by aphextwin

    IMO

    Those 'space' suits look like an excuse for just to show the audience that the actors are in shape. It's 300 in space. Rubber fetishists will have a blast though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 10:19:59 AM CST

    m6y- your observations are mature and rational about ratings

    by mcgootoo

    So, hatedperson should be letting you know how much you love censorship soon, since he is the prince of stupidity:

    Here is hatedpersons intelligence on display, note that he has nothing to say, except PG-13 sucks and he is either gay or hates women or both, and he loves to say it, over and over, because some people are dumb enough to agree with him, and that is what fuels his infantile stance:


    So this is shitty and fucked... First it will be pg-13 then... they have another bitch fucking female lead. With the thing they changed the lead to a whinny bitch, because they wanted something different then the original. In this one they are fucking with Sigourney weaver by casting a young hot actress.... Fuck this shit. Fuck you Hollywood where did your balls go. Looks like a PG-13 suckfest with a CUNT in the lead. _________________________________

    chilli mcfreeze You are so Fucking Wrong!!! PG-13 will be a death sentence to this movie.

    ________________________________

    mcgootoo likes censorship, because thats all he stands for.

    _____________________________________

    Just to be clear, I want this film to be amazing. I love Alien and all the sequels except AVP! I want this to be amazing, but ....
    with a PG-13 rating and a Sigourney replacement lead I just don't see it happening. If they wanted to go different it should be a male lead, or Bring in Sigourney weaver. She is amazing. I would take her over most male leads any day of the week.


    _____________________________________

    He must think Sigourney is a man..... poor boy....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 10:47:08 AM CST

    there is ABSOLUTE ZERO chance Promethes will be rated R as....

    by cartmanez.

    -first and foremost they can gross more $ on PG13 rating

    -they can release the harder R cut on DVD/BR therefore increasing dvd sales.

    -they can kind of get away with abit more these days on a PG13 rating (e.g. Apollo 18 was pretty intense space horror wise)....even an F bomb or two

    -Fox has already done a PG13 Alien movie before which ended up the highest grossing film in the series(unadjusted for inflation)
    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=alien.htm

    -Alien/Predator (FOX), Terminator and Die Hard(FOX) have all been PG13 recently so its not entiely a shocking thing now

    -Avatar made nearly $3b for Fox....Promethues is half being promoted as another Avatar type movie (as opposed to being a full on Alien prequel)

    - and perhaps most telling of all, they havent come out and said 'dont worry it will be R'...which they would do if it was going to be an R. instead they've skirted round the issue saying it hasnt been decided yet, there will be topless scenes, it will be intense/scary etc (just like what happened with Terminator 4):
    'Lindelof asked the director, "Is the PG-13 going to inhibit you from telling the story you want to tell?" and Scott responded "No, not at all. I have a responsibility to my studio, but I always make sure we have both options. You’re crazy not to. Tom and I will both look at it and decide what the best way of going. I’ve fundamentally covered our ass. But there will still be naked push-ups." -- the naked push-ups in question being part of the footage shown, a glimpse at Charlize Theron's character. Reading between the lines, this means that, gorier, nuder material is being shot, but don't count on it being part of the theatrical release; an unrated DVD/Blu-Ray will likely surface around Christmas 2012'
    http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/ridley_scott_is_shooting_for_both_an_r-rated_pg-13_cut_of_prometheus

    Reply to Talkback

  • Other then that, i'm quite enthusiastic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 10:50:42 AM CST

    If ALIEN had been made today, would it be R or PG-13?

    by asimovlives

  • Nov 23, 2011 10:53:43 AM CST

    cartmanez

    by mcgootoo

    But it's gonna suck and destroy the fabric of society if it is not rated R and has ugggghhhh women in it!!!!


    Just kidding....



    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:40:38 AM CST

    I am also worried about this movie ruining the mystique of Alien

    by franks_television

    The derelict space craft is probably my favorite thing in Alien, precisely because it is so mysterious and creepy. I really have absolutely no interest in learning all the details and backstory on it, and if that is what Prometheus is about I may even consider not seeing it rather than risking it lessening my enjoyment of one of my all-time favorite movies.

    Who am I kidding? There is no way I will be able to avoid seeing this, and it is probably going to be disappointing and it will probably diminish Alien at the same time. Fuck.

    I hope I am wrong, but the stakes are just so high with this. My biggest hope is that they just don’t even touch the Alien backstory, though these pics make that seem highly unlikely. What somebody said earlier about the Jockeys creating both humans and xenomorphs is probably (sadly) correct.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:42:45 AM CST

    Alien would totally be rated R today.

    by franks_television

    That movie is freaking terrifying, and there is more than enough gore for an R rating. Plus, the people talk like actual humans, meaning that they use swear words.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:47:42 AM CST

    First pic is lame. Pretty people with flashlights. 2nd is great

    by yeahiluvcheezypoofs

    The huge head thing is creepy. Like it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:47:55 AM CST

    franks_television

    by mcgootoo

    I loved the mystery and unanswered questions of 2011.

    But 2010, with it's details, did not ruin 2001 for me.

    Just go for the ride. in space... no one can hear you worry....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:10:23 PM CST

    Glad to see that we have the technology to span the galaxy,

    by openthepodbaydoorshal

    but flashlights are still flashlights.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 12:13:44 PM CST

    The suggestion of bush and perky nipples on Weaver?

    by openthepodbaydoorshal

    R......for sure.

    Almost any hint of nudity nowadays is beyond PG13, is it not?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Uh, maybe because in the first movie they were truckers in space, and truckers tend to have more ragged equipment.

    I'll take Common Sense for $500, Alex.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 1:03:04 PM CST

    why do u always say FACT!!! at the end?

    by billy_d_williams

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:08:19 PM CST

    Will the Ripley-clone,token-female protagonist

    by killik

    pause while exploring the egg storage room and put some lipstick on her lips? i wanna know.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:21:35 PM CST

    =an unrated DVD/Blu-Ray =

    by killik

    But we want to watch the goddamn R-Rated movie in the theater.Not in the home cinema,in our living room.

    But nobody is going to wait for the superior,unrated version,they all are going to watch the movie in the theaters.So they will get a lesser cinematic experience of what it was meant to be.And that is at least annoying.

    Reply to Talkback

  • if not then if ever there was a time to introduce such a thing itd be for Promethues

    kiddies and their parents wanting to see the next Avatar go to the pussy PG13 showing.....fans of A L I E N and cool kidless adults go see the hard R rated version and get scared shitless by the overbearing feeling of dread and horrific gore with the occational F bomb

    if it takes off (and i cant see any drawbacks to it) it could also done for The Wolverine and any other movies which logic clearly dicates should be R but the studio want as PG-13 (e.g Die Hard 5, Terminator 5, Mad Max 4 etc)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 2:35:34 PM CST

    darth_kong

    by proevad

    Nice. :-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • I LOVE the original cast for their everyman qualities. They all looked, acted and sounded like what you'd expect from a typical deep space freight crew.

    Their where no stupid love triangles, incessant crying for their children back home or long heartfelt letters to mommy. For them it was wheter they'd get a better percentage or salvage pay or how shitty the coffee was. Problems that makes sense in the context.

    I just know they're gonna have the protagonist in Prometheus in some long winded scene where he says goodbye to his pregnant wife and sings a lullyby for his unborn child. You know, cause he is all sensetivie like. Not just a tough handsome alpha male.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:01:47 PM CST

    ff outfits

    by foree forehead

    fantastic four costumes. surely this has been mentioned? the sci-fi chanel look of those pics does not jive with ken's mental images, alas. i'll still see it, and i'm hopeful. come on scott.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:03:22 PM CST

    Noomi Rapace was inspired casting though.

    by tradeskilz

  • Face it...Hollywood no longer makes movies for adults. Everything is aimed at kids now, so a PG-13 rating on a tie-in film to Ridley's R-rated Alien doesn't surprise me at all. For example, WB bought the rights to bring "Lobo" to the big screen then hired Guy Ritchie to direct it. Warner insisted on PG-13, blaming the rating for Watchmen's disappointing box office so Ritchie walked. "At the Mountains of Madness" is another instance of studio interference pressuring Del Toro to jettison the R and so, Del Toro is seeing if he can find another studio willing to let him do it as an R. And what about that "BioShock" adaptation Gore Verbinski wants to shoot? Universal Studios acquired the rights and mind bogglingly demands a PG-13 rating. If you have ever played the game you would know that it would be fucking impossible to tone down the macabre violent setting inhabited with enemies that are psychotic babbling mutants and hulking drill-wielding Big Daddies in dive suits mutilating victims to bloody puddles of guts. Universal doesn't give a shit. They just figure its based off a video game and only young children play games so a PG-13 is the only option for success. PG-13 does not immediately indicate whether a movie will suck or not BUT, if it was a studio edict and not an artistic decision than it sure as hell gives us a reason to be extremely skeptical. I just hope Ridley makes his decisions based on what best serves the Alien universe and not on what will placate cigar chompin' out of touch studio honchos. But really, like they give a flying rat fuck what some AICN comments section movie nerd thinks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • The point you're making is sound, but not so much the comparison.

    Great, funny pic, though! Good find!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:14:46 PM CST

    @wookie_weed - please don't remind me of Alien 3. :)

    by kevred

    (Shudder.) Or Alien 4, for that matter.

    I know what you mean about Prometheus. I feel the same way. Hopefully the real, moving thing will make us feel better.

    I want it to be great - there are so few prospects for this kind of thing these days. This being really good could open up some doors for other good stuff.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:20:52 PM CST

    Yeah seriously, what is the deal with that serial killer head?

    by stargrove

    I immediately felt that pic looked really out of place within the "Alienverse". Makes me think a Michael Myers/Jason fiend is gonna be chasing the space crew around the ship corridors throughout the whole damn flick. Ridley must be a big fan of Jason X.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:27:27 PM CST

    based on these photos, this movie is going to suck

    by mcgootoo

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:27:35 PM CST

    based on these photos, this movie is going to be great

    by mcgootoo

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:27:44 PM CST

    that should cover it

    by mcgootoo

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:28:31 PM CST

    stargrove

    by mcgootoo

    It's a Rorhshach test- you see a serial killer head.



    Uh oh....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:38:55 PM CST

    Oh it's you again mcgootoo

    by stargrove

    Actually when I first saw it I thought: "Hey, it's still a better lookin mug than Diane Keatons".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:41:47 PM CST

    stargrove

    by mcgootoo

    Well, la di dah ,la di dah...

    to each there own

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:55:15 PM CST

    Appearently you don't need to know...

    by jimmy_009

    ...anatomy to have a high paying gig at EW. "I knows Photoshop! KEWL!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 3:57:22 PM CST

    Is this Mass Effect?

    by bruce thomas wayne

  • Nov 23, 2011 4:03:39 PM CST

    bruce thomas wayne

    by mcgootoo

  • Nov 23, 2011 4:43:47 PM CST

    @darth_kong "Ripley's story was finished at the end of ALIENS."

    by keepyoureyesontheblackboy

  • Nov 23, 2011 4:54:07 PM CST

    wouldnt it be great if Promethues was out next month?

    by cartmanez.

    and that these few pics and a trailer due in a week or so were all you would know about the movie.

    instead we'll all feel like we've seen the film by the time it arrives summer 2012 thanks to a bunch of different trailers, numourous magazine articles and worst of all Internet news/spoliers/pictures/speculations etc

    ahh for the time of a few measely photos in Starlog and a trailer

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 5:01:22 PM CST

    I hate how everyone has to be so good-looking now.

    by bigtuna

    Just like in the Thing prequel. The original cast was so average looking and believable actors. This Alien prequel looks the same.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 5:25:34 PM CST

    in the 1990s

    by emeraldboy

    there was a campaign by conservative family groups to clean up television which they saw as becoming increasingly violent. the show they targeted at the time was buffy the vampire slayer.

    these were the same people who were shocked and appalled by what clinton in the oval office with monica lewinsky. these people were brilliantly satirized in the simpson as the wont somebody think of the children groups....

    When bush came to power these people saw an opportunity to once and for all clean up tv and movies. the family film bill was drafted and signed into law and most controversially of all the fcc was given real teeth. the best example of this was the the janet jackson superbowl incident. mtv was collared by the fcc and to cut out any swearing introduced a time delay. mtv then had to pre record its award show and then edited out any swearing.

    The family film bill makes it mandatory by law that all films should have no cursing, no violence, no sex, no nudity. prior to this nc17 was a kiss of death. so this is why you have the growth pg 13 films.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Kidding. These don't bother me at all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:07:22 PM CST

    SOUNDTRACK

    by ihatetalkbacks

    any one know whos doing it?

    Hated Person - you need therapy, seriously. Its not a joke. I doubt you mysogeny is a joke and it boils over all too easily, do every one a favour before you hurt some one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:23:53 PM CST

    That second picture is AWESOME.

    by isaac_r

    God I hope it's a practical set.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:27:48 PM CST

    CENSORSHIP

    by mentaldominance

    The issue with censorship is that good and bad TV isn't about what's shown.

    You can't censor based on what is shown alone.

    Look at Passion of the Christ. I hate the film but seriously, would that film have been as impacting without the violence?

    Yet the self titled "Christians" who praised it as wonderful would have no problem censoring a PG or PG-13

    film that didn't represent their agenda. Seems they know all too well that it's about agenda, not what's shown!

    It's about the viewpoint the director represents.

    You can't legislate morality. What about the fact that NBC showed fully uncensored versions of Saving Private Ryan during the holidays?

    It's not about violence, it's about when violence is glorified.

    It's not about sex either.

    It's about the viewpoint of the director and when they preach a viewpoint at us rather than simply observing how life really is.

    So called "Christian" art is just as bad, cramming viewpoints down our throat rather than simply telling a good story.

    When you force censorship on a film maker who truly has a bad agenda and who's intent is to corrupt society, all you do is

    force them to become even more subtle. Now they have to imply things rather than show them and guess what?!?!

    THAT MAKES THE MESSAGE EVEN STRONGER!

    People who are for censorship don't realize that they're actually empowering the forces they wish to destroy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:57:29 PM CST

    Weaver in granny panties with bush poking-out and nips...

    by bigtuna

    Made me beat my ham a lot in my youth.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 6:59:34 PM CST

    shouldve done something like stargate instead

    by dioxholsters_ghost

    alien is cool though so i'll take it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:07:42 PM CST

    I love it when...

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    >>> PrometheusNews dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dear prometheusnews_dot_net,

    YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON. George Lucas did NOT plan out a Star Wars trilogy. He barely got the first film released in 1977, and if it weren't for the very talented people that put THEIR creativity and talent into it, it would not have been the huge success that it was, thus opening the door to start preparing a way to lengthen the story into 2 more films. If Star Wars did not do well, then it would have stood on it's own and the story would have been done. Don't for ONE minute think that George had this big outline for multiple trilogies ready to film. It's complete bullshit according to Kurtz and many others that I would believe ANY DAY OF THE WEEK before Lucas and his revisionist horseshit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:42:11 PM CST

    Thanks for sharing your opinion...

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    >>> PrometheusNews dot Net

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 7:54:37 PM CST

    Agreed- Fantastic Four want their spacesuits back

    by deelzbub

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:10:53 PM CST

    look like fancy costumes

    by winona_ryders_pussy_juice

    unlike the gritty realism of Alien.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 8:42:55 PM CST

    So it's Ancient Aliens: The Motion Picture?

    by mel_gibsons_nazi_dad

    I'm not really up to speed on the plot of this. All i know is that it's Scott and something to do with the Alien franchise and that alone gives me a big geekrection.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 9:37:31 PM CST

    mentaldominance - PASSION of the CHRIST

    by darth_kong

    I couldn't agree with you more.

    The movie is nothing but TORTURE PORN. AND THE GENTILES LOVE IT!

    That movie is nothing more than MIND MANIPULATION. If you watch that you've been manipulated.

    From a guy that for years FREQUENTED BARS on Pacific Coast Highway and everyone is shocked when he gets pulled over and arrested and throws around a bunch of anti-jewish remarks at the officer which isn't to different than the kids in Harry Potter casting spells on each other.

    Mel Gibson represents what all that garbage is about.

    Words and terms and symbols and mind manipulation.

    And when people like him, CHRISTIANS, don't have TOTAL CONTROL and TOTAL DOMINATION of your MIND they have a meltdown as the world's seen him do a multiple times.

    I mean, PEOPLE WERE SHOCKED AT THE PHONE MESSAGES/RECORDINGS?!

    What's the big surprise?

    I said COMING FROM THE GUY THAT MADE PASSION of the CHRIST, I WAS EXPECTING MUCH MORE! HE WAS HOLDING BACK!


    Reply to Talkback

  • Totally agree dude. When I saw Aliens, all I'd seen were a couple of magazine spreads. I'd seen Alien of course, so I had an inkling of what to expect.

    This EW mess is about as much as I want to know about Prometheus. I wish I hadn't seen the giant stone head (which kind of looks like Guy Pearce, who we haven't seen in any promos yet), it would have been a big surprise.

    Oh well. The only way to relive the days of surprises is to turn off the internet and avoid nerd friends.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:19:48 PM CST

    In the ending of Prometheus...

    by bnitt

    ......we find out all of humankind is related to Jar Jar Binks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:26:53 PM CST

    You know something's amiss when even Jim Cameron...

    by wookie_weed

    couldn't get Del Toro an R-rating for Mountains Of Madness.

    It was bad enough watching the Shield for 6 years and not one person ever saying the word "fuck".

    Can you imagine Aliens without Hudson's potty mouth? Ripley saying, "Get away from her, you monster!"

    Because if Aliens was made today, FOX would force PG-13. It's a sad day for movie fans when Ridley Scott is neutered by conservative lobbyists and is made a eunuch director.

    Grow a fucking pair, Ridley, and make that R-Rating for the cinemas... not for a fucking money grabbing Christmas bluray release.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:29:30 PM CST

    Big Budget in return for PG-13?

    by wookie_weed

    Maybe Ridley had to make a deal to get the big budget he wanted for Prometheus, and give up the R rating?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:39:15 PM CST

    Alien Prequel News....

    by thisbethesdasea

    Is the only place online to get substantial news that often times haven't been reported anywhere else. Prometheus-movie and Prometheusnews.net are just copies of each other, reporting the same news everyone else has with no insider scoop. Facts.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2011 11:46:06 PM CST

    FACTS for spacehunter3tard

    by mponder486

    You are an idiot, fact.

    The entire film community and anyone with a brain rate Ridley Scott films very high, fact.

    This movie is going to be amazing, fact.

    Doubters will be judged before Ripley at the pearly gates, maybe a fact.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 12:14:50 AM CST

    The first pic proves the alien gay love script is being filmed

    by wookie_weed

    Noomi's caught in the middle.

    Just trolling. I'm really looking forward to Prometheus -- I just have a bad feeling about the PG-13. And Robin Hood left me underwhelmed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 12:54:53 AM CST

    darthkong:

    by mentaldominance

    I don't have a problem with Mel Gibson at all.

    Let he who is without sin cast the first stone ya know?

    I just think Passion of the Christ sucks.

    I love all his other films however and am always able to distance what an artist does in his or her

    personal life from their art. Most artists are really fucked up... At least... Many of the good ones are.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 1:01:31 AM CST

    FACT

    by spacehunter3-d

    No one in the film community has a brain. Ripley's butt crack at the pearly gates? interesting thought

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 1:11:41 AM CST

    mentaldominance

    by darth_kong

    I don't have a problem with Mel Gibson either.

    I'm saying people shouldn't be shocked by his behavior.

    He's been telling you who he really is for years.

    People just choose not to see it until it's right in your face.

    I'm saying, what are you shocked or surprised about?

    He's not acting in his movies. He's showing you parts of who he really is.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 1:14:41 AM CST

    It's best not to think of this as an Alien prequel...

    by lesbianna_winterlude

    since no one who made this movie did.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 1:54:45 AM CST

    JaimePraterNews dot Net is the only source of rubbish on the internet. FACT

    by prometheusnews_dot_net

    JaimePraterNews dot Net is the only source of rubbish on the internet. FACT

    Reply to Talkback

  • Compare their effete look to the workaday appearance of Theron and Elba.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Look at it. It's Photoshopped.

    Don't even regard it. It's not real.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 3:04:12 AM CST

    fuck

    by rhizomeman

    Although the whole R rating thing may seem a small concession to some it does have a huge emotional impact on a film - especially with language. If an alien is chasing you around a dark ship in space you are going to say "fuck" and "shit" and "motherfuckingshit" multiple times. It grounds the movie in a sense of realism - that's how normal people speak when reacting to seriously fucked up shit happening around them. Anything less takes away from that realism and brings you out of the film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 3:09:06 AM CST

    @burnhollywood, the "all androids" theory has been mentioned

    by wookie_weed

    i sincerely hope it's not the case, it'd be like knowing the twist in The Sixth Sense at the start.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 3:09:40 AM CST

    So PG-13 in the USA means no "F" word, right?

    by wookie_weed

    That's just sad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 3:10:40 AM CST

    America, please get an MA15+ rating, it's not that hard

    by wookie_weed

    Australia has it, it works brilliantly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 3:14:58 AM CST

    @rhizomeman it's why The Shield never rang true for me

    by wookie_weed

    Ronny's the one who gets busted at the end... and he can't say the f word. Seriously, no "you motherfucking cunt, Vic! Fuck you, you fucking fuckity fuck fuck!"

    Considering what Sex & The City got to do, it's fucking bullshit.

    So no "fuck" in Prometheus. I guess they can invent a future swear word, "frak" for example.

    Oh wait...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 3:18:21 AM CST

    Can you imagine Hudson in a PG-13 Aliens?

    by wookie_weed

    He'd be a freaking mime, using sign language.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 6:30:06 AM CST

    mentaldominance

    by asimovlives

    We have had our differences before, but what you said about THE PASSION OF CHRIST is the truth. And you made some very astute observations about the inherent failure of censorship. Morality shouldn't be legislized indeed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 6:30:19 AM CST

    Why cant they release both pg 13 and r rated versions

    by velagod

    Why cant they release both pg 13 and r rated versions they do it with 3d and 2d then when more people go and watch the r rated version then maybe they will fucking learn something could be a big moment for these stupid studios.

    Reply to Talkback

  • I would basically make two diferent versions of the same movies. Make a PG-13 version foer the americna domestic market, and a rated R equivalent for the international market and selected americna theaters. The leater means that the foreign market, which seems less concerned with issues of language and violence (specially in continental western europe.. except Germany), and some limited american theaters which wouldn't mind to show the R rated version.

    So, that way, everybody would be happy. The studios would get their precious PG-13 rated movie (hell, they could even edit the thing themselves without my intervention) and i would happilly edit the R rated version to my will without the studios breathing on my neck.

    Everybody would win. Then, eventually, the american market could get my director's R rated cut later on DVd/Blu-Ray, just like they do anyway. Again, everybody would win. Me, the studios, the audiences american and abroad, everybody.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 7:21:52 AM CST

    Unfortunately Asimov, you can't reason with Studio suits

    by wookie_weed

    it's like telling a hamster to paint like picasso, not rembrandt. Studios only think of one thing -- how to get as many butts on seats on opening weekend as possible.

    Prometheus is a summer release as well, further proof they're thinking about getting as many popcorn munching imbeciles in cinemas as possible.

    And when it comes to Alien, FOX have fucking photos of everyone in Hollywood, they just keep getting their way with everything and manage to fuck it up.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 7:23:33 AM CST

    I still have hope for Prometheus, I WANT it to be good

    by wookie_weed

    But the PG-13 enforcement just sours what could be a perfect return to form for Ridley, and a perfect return to mature storytelling in scifi.

    Reply to Talkback

  • R means you're getting an edge of suspense to everything, a sense of menace. You don't know how gory the chest burster scene will be, you're on the edge of your seat not knowing whether you should close your eyes, anything can happen. It's like going to sleep knowing that there really could be a monster in the cupboard.

    With PG-13, you know the filmmaker has limits, and it's almost like the lights are all turned on and you know there isn't a monster in a cupboard, so you go to sleep without a worry.

    To get the director's preferred version of Prometheus, we shouldn't have to wait until the bluray.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 7:45:34 AM CST

    wookie_weed

    by asimovlives

    I don't think my plan would hurt the studios. they would still get the movie they want, and besides the studios onpoy think of the americna domestic market, they think the international market is a sideshow (despite the fact it's where most of the money really cames from).

    With my plan, the studios would had nothing to lose. They would still get the movie they wanted, as they want.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 7:51:20 AM CST

    wookie_weed, also consider this:

    by asimovlives

    with my plan, this means that the USa market would still get two versions of the same movie, with the PG-13 rated version opening big nationwide while the rated R version in selected theaters. The studios could even measure what version would be the public's favorite by counting the box office results by theater room attendance. If proportionally the rated R version was getting better responses by theater room, they would know which version to push for commercially just after a week. Easy. Everybody would win.

    Reply to Talkback

  • sweet dreams:
    http://www.alienprequelnews.com/2011/01/some-clarifications-on-ridley-scotts.html

    Reply to Talkback

  • sweet dreams:
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_L7v50iqjRO4/TTTnc1HkJpI/AAAAAAAAABs/IdfZtYEwWn0/s1600/tumblr_ksk9otPxRc1qa1o5zo1_250.jpg

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 9:03:09 AM CST

    Guys, you're sweating the ratings thing way too much.

    by darth_kong

  • Michael Fassbender says "There's definitely a link to Alien... There's creatures in it that you'll recognize," while Charlize Theron says, "I think people should really let go of the idea that it's an Alien film."

    Of course, Fassbender may be referring to some other creatures we might recognize, while Theron might mean that more in a philosophical sense that this will depart from the style of previous Alien movies, even if the Xenomorphs themselves do put in some manner of appearance. Your guess is as good as mine at this point.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 9:43:21 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by mcgootoo

    Unfortunately, many GEEKS seem just as susceptible to blind group think as religious fanatics.

    RE: Star Wars vs. Star Trek being better, wanting R-ratings instead of good stories, you get the point.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 9:45:43 AM CST

    "With PG-13, you know the filmmaker has limits"

    by scratchmonkey

    They have limits with the R rating too, don't they? They have more freedom, obviously, but they're still restrained by limits imposed on them in order to qualify for an R rating.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 10:01:10 AM CST

    limits often kick start creativity

    by mcgootoo

    And what's up with the fucking geeks who scream for soemthing different, and then when it looks like they are going to get something different, they want it to be the same?

    Fuck

    So Alien was rated R.

    Prometheus is not.

    Prometheus is not Alien.

    Get over it.

    And hope for the same level of greatness, instead of whining about the differences.

    Smart Geeks understand.





    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 10:03:20 AM CST

    FINNALY!!

    by thedoctor28

    Some Prometheus here at AICN. The fact is back in the day, movies were made to be "good movies" hence the rated R to make a "better" movie. Now movies are made to MAKE MONEY ONLY. PG13 is here to stay, sucks but the truth. I am hoping this movie will KICK ASS. Its been a while since we have had a REALLY GOOD SF movie. The New THING movie was such a waste of time and money. It cost them 33 mil to make it and only made like 16 mil in the theaters. That could have been a great flick if they would have made a seq instead of a preq. We all know how the new one ends?!?! We all wanted to see what happened NEXT!!! Assholes never do what the fans want. For instance, Fans wanted a Star Trek with SULU TV series about the Ship he was captain on. We got the SHIT Brenen and Braga wanted which was ENTERPRISE. ASSHOLES didn't even have the work ST in the opening at first. Its amazing to me that they do the opposite of what the fans want and wonder why the shit BOMBS! Fucked up!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 10:27:08 AM CST

    The stuff Kong is saying about the Serpents,

    by alan_grant_lives

    ancient gods, kundalini, gnosis is all solid, but where are all these images and ancient arcane symbols I'm obviously missing? Some links would be much appreciated. It's going to be a promethius-lucifer-kundalni/twin serpents-chutulu-old ones balls to the wall mash-up?
    Sounds great.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 10:30:04 AM CST

    thedoctor28

    by mcgootoo

    I like your enthusiasm.


    You say:

    The fact is back in the day, movies were made to be "good movies" hence the rated R to make a "better" movie.

    But, The fact is, back in the day, there were no ratings, just the Hays code, which allowed for censorship, before the current ratings system.

    With that censorship, countless great, now classic films were created.

    Freedom does not always equal effective storytelling creativity.

    It does allow for FUCK and bush.

    Which reminds me, FUCK BUSH.......


    And you say, as countless parrots say:

    Now movies are made to MAKE MONEY ONLY.

    That is just silly and severely shortsighted hypberbole.


    Of course, I do not believe that any filmmaker makes a film to not be seen by anybody, so yes, all filmmakers want their films to have a paying audience, so they can make more films, if that is their predilection.

    But the only reason is to make money? All filmmakers?

    Don't people realize how dopey this sounds?

    Who wants their work to lose money?

    Except for Bialystock & Bloom....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 10:43:27 AM CST

    It's not rated R but it IS - Aliens on Ice

    by mcgootoo

    http://tinyurl.com/6tunucu


    Last weekend, Old Murder House Theater troupe staged a 90-minute, fast-forwarded recreation of James Cameron's space marine classic Aliens at a local hockey rink. The best part of the show? Only the xenomorphs really knew how to skate, whereas the space marines lurched for their lives. Witness the unparalleled chaos that was Aliens on Ice.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 10:44:12 AM CST

    alan_grant_lives - a link for Solomon's Temple plans...

    by darth_kong

    http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/king_solomons_temple/page_13.htm

    The two black dots in the middle are the pillars JACHIN AND BOAZ.

    JACHIN and BOAZ represent the Male Penis.

    Now look at the words ORACLE - TEMPLE - PORCH and imagine the MALE PHALLIC INSIDE THE FEMALE BOX.

    There it is.

    The ORACLE being the HEAD the TEMPLE being the SHAFT and the PORCH ain't the twig it's the BERRIES.

    It's no mystery, it's sex worship. The idea is the GENERATIVE or REGENERATIVE MALE DOMINATED PRINCIPLE.

    WHY IS THERE A MALE HEAD IN THE PICTURES?

    I'm asking the question.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 10:50:22 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by mcgootoo

    This is starting to feel like a Lost Talkback a little.

    THat's cool with me...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Eggs.

    It's all visual and SYMBOLIC METAPHORS.

    What is a WOMAN?

    A MAN WITH A WOMB.

    All ships are FEMALE.

    Think about it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • If it is a temple.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:02:50 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by mcgootoo

    Intererting theories, but sometimes, a spaceship is just a spaceship.

    But I do admire your imagination....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:05:00 AM CST

    mcgootoo

    by darth_kong

    Sometimes an Alien is just an Alien.

    Or it's a CREATURE WITH A THREE to FOUR FOOT LONG PENIS HEAD.

    ;)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:07:33 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by mcgootoo

    But when I hear the words from 2001 ---

    OPEN POD BAY DOORS, PLEASE HAL

    Sometimes I hear ----

    OPEN PADME'S DRAWERS, PLEASE HAL

    So maybe you have a point.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:09:59 AM CST

    mcgootoo

    by darth_kong

    Remember Robot Chicken?

    Padamommay or Panda Bear or Whatever the hell her name is!

    What the hell's an Aluminum Falcon?!

    LMAO!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:11:49 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by mcgootoo

    Yup, loved last weeks episode too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:18:08 AM CST

    Asi

    by darth_kong

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:19:04 AM CST

    asi

    by mcgootoo

    To be certain.

    I really, really want to see Prometheus.

    I showed the first 25 minutes of 2001 to a friend last night, someone who has never seen, it believe it or not.

    We were watching an episode of Ancient Aliens, an episode about the possibility of Aliens influencing the birth of humankind, when I started describing 2001 to her.

    I described the opening first, then showed it to her.

    I felt like a teacher....

    Gimme outer space adventure!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:25:24 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by mcgootoo

    Since it is written by a Lost writer, you may really be on to something with the symbology...

    That would certainly guarantee some repeat viewing, and open-ended interpretation ala 2001, if so....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:27:27 AM CST

    mcgootoo

    by asimovlives

    It's my complete conviction that all that business of ancient astronauts from another world to be complete bullshit.

    It doesn't prevent me from loving 2001 like my own blood.

    It's great to show other people movies, masterpieces they don't know yet and see their reactions of awe, of discovery of something great they had no ida about. I saw that happened with my friends when i showed them for the first time BARRY LYNDON, GOODFELLAS and THE HOLY MOUNTAIN.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Hard to say.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:37:18 AM CST

    asi

    by mcgootoo

    It's my complete conviction that all that business of ancient astronauts from another world to be complete bullshit.


    I tend to agree with you, but leave a little wiggle room for the slim possibility, since I don't like to rule out anything until there is real evidence as to mankind's origins.

    But, I do watch Ancient Aliens, consider most of their theories to be laughable, but fun, and primarily watch the program because they show the audience images of art, artifacts, and structures that I have not previously witnessed, and they are often compelling and fascinating, and get me deep thinking about the seemingly limitless wonders of the own, and unknown universe(s).

    So, it is a show with something more than just a joke premise, that aliens were very prominent in all aspects of ancient cultures.


    BARRY LYNDON, GOODFELLAS and THE HOLY MOUNTAIN.

    All great films, of course I love Barry Lyndon, for among it's other superior elements, it's lighting.









    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:37:33 AM CST

    Would EXTRATERRESTRIAL DNA be worth more than GOLD to MAN?

    by darth_kong

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:40:00 AM CST

    Are thumbs fingers?

    by darth_kong

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:40:19 AM CST

    I get no help from these people!

    by darth_kong

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:42:33 AM CST

    darth_kong - do fish have fingers?

    by mcgootoo

    No?

    Then whay do people eat them all the time?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:48:06 AM CST

    Man was crerat4ed to be:

    by mcgootoo

  • Nov 24, 2011 11:49:35 AM CST

    Man was created to be...

    by mcgootoo

    ..figures in a reality show viewed by our Alien creators.

    Or we are just....... hmmmmmmmm........

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 12:02:11 PM CST

    darth_kong

    by asimovlives

    Who's to say aliens have DNA. DNA can and most certainly is provincial to Earth alone. And even on earth it's not the only way for genetics to propagate a spieces.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 12:05:06 PM CST

    asimovlives

    by darth_kong

    How about silicon?

    Didn't Ash say something about silicon in Alien?

    I forget.

    Maybe the whole concept of BIOMECHANICS is opposite of DNA?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 12:17:20 PM CST

    by darth_kong

    by asimovlives

    "Maybe the whole concept of BIOMECHANICS is opposite of DNA? "


    Possibly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 12:37:15 PM CST

    FATHER! FATHER! THE SLEEPER HAS AWAKENED!

    by darth_kong

  • Nov 24, 2011 12:44:47 PM CST

    the whole story behind space truckers is incredible...

    by emeraldboy

    and how it bellyflopped and the repercussions for mary breen farrelly were that apart from being made bankrupt she was run out of town by the irish film industry...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 12:57:47 PM CST

    the least i know about PROMETHEUS, the better.

    by asimovlives

    i feel i know too much about it already.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 1:05:43 PM CST

    dj author and film critic dave fanning does not agree

    by emeraldboy

    with all that psuedo sexual reference and called Mark Kermode an idiot on air once when he saw kermode talk about alien on tv once. a monster movie in space is just a monster movie in space....

    it think it pissed fanning off when people read to much into things...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 1:09:56 PM CST

    everything is still up for speculation people.

    by danielnocharismacraig

    That includes the rating for this movie. Didn't it ever occur to anyone here that ridley Scott just might be putting out more disinformation onpurpose?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 4:30:52 PM CST

    danielnocharismacraig

    by asimovlives

    yeah, there's much merit to that though there, friend.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 4:48:40 PM CST

    Noomi Rapace looks so pretty in that first photo above.

    by asimovlives

    And that's she in a space suit. Ridley Scott sure knows how to make his leading ladies look a million dollars.

    And then there's the fact this movie also has Charlize Theron in it as well. Man, this movie is filled to the grills with female awesomeness.

    Reply to Talkback

  • it seems that Prometheus will be going for that eerie unsettling feel, as opposed to a lot of gore. the scares and eerieness from the search for God and origins of mankind, creating an atmosphere full of dread which will make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up. We should be scared, and creeped out, by the implications of the ideas presented, and the sense of weirdness or errieness, akin to 2001, Alien (obviously) the original Twilight Zone and some of the 1st season episodes of original Star Trek which had that eerie, uncanny vibe - the ship alone charting a haunted universe that hid some deeply strange things ... the horror will be in reaction to the concepts unfolding...what it means for mankind...where we came from...who or what is behind it..and why...our place in the universe etc.... the unfathomable big questions we might be better off not knowing the answers to...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 5:53:35 PM CST

    It looks like theyre going for an atmosphere of Fantastic Four

    by winona_ryders_pussy_juice

    forget PG-13, is this PG?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 6:15:57 PM CST

    Well with all this symbolism?

    by ihatetalkbacks

    Look at the top picture, what does this tell us? Well the people are wearing blue, whats blue - the sea, what does the sea do? Seperate us so we have to go on journies. Those figures are literally going on a journy.

    What is this a prequel to? Alien - what does alien mean? Foreign. So where do foreigners go to be together? America - give us your disposesed, and who are the most famous Americans? The 3 stooges - represented by the 3 figures.

    What does this tell us? That even if we are together and the same (all white and in the same outfit) we are all different and we will always hurt each other. What hurts people in this film? The Aliens, but we are all aliens and deswtined to hurt each other.

    Maybe if thats what it all means... but it might not, but it obviously does.

    Im off to get my tin foil hat and regrout my monitor.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 7:35:49 PM CST

    Fantastic Four should have look more this way

    by chien_sale

    space explorers

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 8:27:36 PM CST

    More symbols

    by ihatetalkbacks

    Those 3 figures are dressed up, where do people first get dressed up for? The Prom.

    All the sexual imigary in Alien - where do people get their first sexual experiences? The Prom - the first 4 letters of PROMetheus.

    Now whats the next letter? E, a drug that makes us hug one another and feel together as one, and also makes us space cadets - just like the crew of the Nostromo. But in the picture of 3 figures, 2 are looking one way and one the other so we cannot be together as one. And what is that torch? Its the torch of a teacher making us dance apart at the PROM!

    And what are the other letters in the films title THEUS, as in THE US. so if we put it all together it means PROM E THE US as all our first sexual experiences are from the Prom and we should get E-ed up so as not to dance apart.

    This could be the case or it might not be, but it could be, but it might not be... so glad that Ridley Scott read my thoughts but he might not have.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 8:47:26 PM CST

    MORE SYMBOLS!

    by ihatetalkbacks

    That stone face is like the album cover of Face Value by Phil Collins. And this is a Sci Fi film like 2001. And what does Dave Bowman say in 2001... "My God its PHIL of stars" and who is the superstar of Phils? PHIL COLLINS, making us go PHIL circle, which is round just like the earth.

    Whats Phils greatest hit? Another Day in Paradise, so the head is a metaphisical / metaPHILsical journey from earth to paradise - PHILidise!

    I am certainly 50/50 this is, is not, maybe certainly probably could well not will be the case. But won't probably will be... until I have seen the film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 9:08:50 PM CST

    Is Phil Collins the Space Jokey

    by ihatetalkbacks

    as in space no one can hear you scream when a Phil Collins record is played?

    Symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol symbol

    Could be if it is!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 24, 2011 10:25:46 PM CST

    Finally saw THE THING 2011

    by mentaldominance

    Whatever idiot was hounding me about seeing it...

    Geeze.

    I had low expectations but come on!

    Seriously?!?!

    NO. I mean SERIOUSLY?!?!?

    It isn't often that low expectations are not even met.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 4:12:32 AM CST

    mentaldominance

    by asimovlives

    Now you know what i fell about Abrams Trek. It isn't pretty, is it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 4:39:27 AM CST

    asimov: It was worse man. Seriously.

    by mentaldominance

    THE THING 2011 makes J.J. remake seem like a masterpiece.

    It's that bad. Seriously. I could not believe it.

    The creature is fucking retarded - like Scooby Doo quality both conceptually and in execution.

    It looked phoney as hell, not a damn shred of practical except for the autopsy.

    Good God the parts when it's the scientist's face coming at him...

    It looked so ridiculous. Terrible on all fronts. And the thing doesn't act like the real THING at all.

    It's hyperspastic, stupid and A.D.D. - Can't even sit still - There were so many times that if

    it had just WAITED (Like how the REAL THING did) it would have been in the clear but no...

    They force terrible fake looking cartoons on us. And don't get me started on the sets and clothes!

    Nothing looked or felt 80's at all. It was like a bunch of kids who either weren't alive or were still

    in diapers in the year 1982 because none of them have a clue what people acted or dressed like.

    And all the actors were over primped by the makeup people as well. They were all made up instead

    of gruff and scruffy how real scientists in 1982 in Antarctica would be. All the hair was perfect, etc.

    Fucking retarded. God, Harry was right - this movie was fucking so bad I can't believe it.

    And yes, it's a remake - it's a beat for beat watered down with cartoons for the kids remake

    under the guise of a prequel. You would not believe how retarded the movie gets.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 4:40:25 AM CST

    Thank God I didn't pay to see THE THING 2011

    by mentaldominance

    It's out now, anyone who can use Google can snag it.

    Be sure to get the subtitles.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 4:44:56 AM CST

    Seriously, the creatures in THING 2011 looked like PS2 Resident Evil

    by mentaldominance

    I kept thinking - Why does this shit look like Resident Evil?

    It was so retarded the creature design...

    And then the fact that they animate it with CGI. It was inexcusable.

    I just don't understand WHY?


    WHY?

    WHY would they do this?

    Who said it would be a good idea?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 5:03:34 AM CST

    The Thing 2011 was PG-13

    by wookie_weed

    Just sayin'. ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Please, please let it happen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • You can have suspense, GOOD F/X, a great soundtrack, great acting, and a great script

    with any rating. THE THING 2011's issue is that it failed on all of these fronts.

    Plus, it WAS RATED R - It just didn't deliver R rated scares.

    You CAN NOT use CGI and make a monster be anything other than a cartoon.

    It shouldn't be attempted. It's just lazy and retarded.

    I can't understand how anyone could be affected by CGI animations.

    I mean, it's so cartoonish looking, it should have been PG-13

    You have to be pretty stupid and/or just not want realism to buy into it.

    It never works. Hopefully this film becomes a testament to that. An example.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 6:38:29 AM CST

    ihatetalkbacks' version I would pitch tent and queue for TODAY.

    by sigourneyweavers3dbeaver

  • Nov 25, 2011 6:49:37 AM CST

    lol the Thing CG creature effects were pretty good

    by winona_ryders_pussy_juice

    for the most part.

    There's just no practical effects industry in place anymore to even consider going that route.

    Sorry but CG is here to stay, better get used to it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 7:21:18 AM CST

    winona:

    by mentaldominance

    If CG is here to stay then a large portion of film goers are simply going to

    stay AWAY, myself included. This can be changed if people vote with their dollar.

    Hopefully Prometheus will show how badly practical f/x are needed today.

    Pretty good? For the most part? Come on man, seriously?

    The f/x were terrible. There is no way you can honestly believe what you're

    saying unless, as I mentioned above, you simply do not want realism in film.

    That's fine - but stick to cartoons and comic books then because realism is

    supposed to be what THE THING is about.

    Don't even get me started on the melted split face thing scene, or that

    fucking thing with the scientist's head on it at the end - man that crap

    looked fucking retarded. You just can't do real creatures with CGI.

    And no, I will *NEVER* get used to it. I simply won't pay for it.

    And if others are smart, they'll do the same.

    Seriously this shit was Resident Evil cut scene quality.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 8:18:41 AM CST

    mentaldominance

    by asimovlives

    I feel your pain, brother.

    And know you know exactly how I feel about Abrams Trek. It's such an ugly feeling, one wants to take revenge. Mere dissing is not enough to cleanse the foul stench it left.

    Reply to Talkback

  • nor do they have the time or budget to create believable practical creatures.

    there are plenty of well-done cgi creatures in movies. they're just not in horror movies, especially r rated horror movies. but thats got nothing to do with the limitations of cg effects.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 11:14:29 AM CST

    stupid, easily refuted rant iow

    by dahveed1972

  • so dont be so absolute with your disapproval of the cgi technology.

    Besides practical effects are not perfect: there are some scenes in the original THING were they clearly look fake.or in the Alien movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 1:17:03 PM CST

    Are you guys serious?

    by mentaldominance

  • Nov 25, 2011 1:20:10 PM CST

    Cartmanez, hopefully you are right...

    by rhizomeman

  • Nov 25, 2011 1:28:13 PM CST

    Are you guys serious?

    by mentaldominance

    You mean you really can't tell the difference between something that's

    actually THERE and something that's dubbed in later on?

    I think you all need to go to film school and learn about things.

    It's clearly obvious when CGI is used. Furthermore, I'm sick of the Jurassic

    Park examples. First off, most of the close up stuff was prosthetic.

    Secondly, a dinosaur has very heavy armored skin.

    CGI does things like that fine. Like space ships and mechanical objects.

    A dinosaur is pretty much like that when you consider it's armor.

    There's nothing really squishy about a dino is what I mean.

    This is where CGI simply fails - it can not do really organic looking things such

    as anything that isn't 400 tons and mechanical or a dinosaur.

    It isn't even about if it looks fake or not as much as it's about the fact that

    CGI just simply isn't even there and you can always tell numerous ways.

    The CGI coloring is always different and it always sticks out like it's too

    sharp. CGI also never moves correctly. Look at the A.D.D. hyper active

    2011 THE THING for an example. Look at the fucking latest Planet of the

    Apes for an example. The animation is always terrible.

    And here we get to the kicker - even if you're still debating on the side of

    "let's do everything in CGI and CGI is just wonderfull!" you can't ignore

    the fact that super imposed things simply never line up with actor's

    reactions... AND EVEN IN THE RARE CASES WHERE THEY DO - The actors

    emotions are still never right because they aren't LOOKING AT ANYTHING.

    It looks fucking ridiculous. "Look here and it's something scary. We'll

    add it in later on, don't worry but for right now just act scared!"

    How the fuck does a director go ahead with that kind of plan?

    It just makes no sense. Do it fucking practical. And again, I am not against

    CGI - I'm against using it as the end all to every fucking effect.

    And it really only has a very small place in film - very quick wide shots

    (can't have them too long else you always know) and mechanical things,

    etc. - but you have to cut that shit QUICK or it still sticks out...

    And DIRECTORS! Directors who are in love with their fucking f/x!

    I can't stand directors like this! "Oooohh look at this!!! (Music swells!)

    We are aweing you! Be awed now! These are amazing effects!"

    I just can't stand it when they parade it around like it's just so fucking

    great. Well.. It isn't great. Less is more guys. It just makes me shut it off.

    Cuz I can't enjoy just looking at a cartoon and that's all it really is.

    It just doesn't stand up to reality. That's why it needs to be used SPARINGLY

    and with understanding of what works and what doesn't.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 1:34:44 PM CST

    killik:

    by mentaldominance

    Also, who even saw AVP and of those who did, who remembers it?

    I sure as hell don't. Also, "universally praised" is stretching it a bit, don't you think?

    If you want a video game then you will like CGI.

    People like me want realism. If you think CGI is acceptable then all you're

    saying is you don't need or want your films to be realistic.

    You're saying you're happy enough just getting the idea but you don't

    really care about if it's done in a realistic way or not.

    To me, that ruins the whole point of film.

    You're not supposed to KNOW it's an effect!

    You're not supposed to be saying "Oh! That's GOOD CGI!"

    How is it fucking good when you know it's there?

    You're not supposed to know an effect is there!

    Yet most CGI parades it's self around and let's you know it's there.

    Furthermore, it expects you to give a shit and be awed by it.

    It's fucking kiddie ass crap, it's not real and I fucking hate it.

    I hate how film is today. Something must be done.

    The bar has been lowered so bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 1:55:12 PM CST

    mentaldominance

    by mcgootoo

    you say:

    People like me want realism. If you think CGI is acceptable then all you're saying is you don't need or want your films to be realistic. To me, that ruins the whole point of film.



    But films are NEVER realistic, by their very nature. Waking dreams is the best description.

    Some movies strive to be more realistic than others, but no movie is 100% realistic.



    AND:

    You're not supposed to KNOW it's an effect!You're not supposed to know an effect is there!



    According to who, you? That is not realistic, and a bit silly.



    Practical effects are usually pretty obvious as well.


    But, BUT I like obvious special effects. AND I LOVE sets, the more obvious, the better, really. I like to admire the work involved in crafting the sets and special effects.

    But yeah, most CGI is woefully bad, and makes many a movie suffer.





    Reply to Talkback

  • what does this have to do with the cgi aliens? we are discussing the potential of the cgi technology here right?

    The cgi Aliens in AvP were praised.The Predators,who were men in suits,were not.The cgi prawns in District 9 were also praised.

    That means that the cgi technology,if used properly,can create wonders.the same goes with the practical effects.

    The nostalgia fanboys kept praising the Kraken in the original Clash of the Titans and condemning the cgi Kraken in the remake as the inferior visual effect because it was cgi.But have they recently watched Harrryhausen's classic monster in that movie? it was a piece of shit and completely fake.sorry but that's the truth.

    Besides give it 20 years more and the cgi will eventually manage to blow the eyes of even the most hardcore naysayers.If you can fap on the sweet cgi ass of Neytiri,now in the 2009,imagine what you will fap on in the 2029.

    CGI is a technology which keeps evolving and will eventually replace practical effects for good.that is a given fact.The problem,the real problem,lies with the people who use it,not with the technology.Are they talented and visionary and especially smart enough to use it as a tool in their filmmaking rather than as the epicenter of their films?

    Reply to Talkback

  • thats abit annoying

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 3:29:14 PM CST

    mcgoo:

    by mentaldominance

    I wasn't singling you out when I said that, in fact, I was reiterating what

    I had said before. I still hold to what I said.

    If you think dodgy dubbed in cartoons are acceptable then you simply do not have

    as high of standards and you should. The standards have been lowered.

    It seems almost as if you're arguing to keep them lowered!

    Yeah, maybe many films aren't realistic but the whole point is a good film maker is

    supposed to try to make them as realistic as possible unless they're just kiddie fare.

    Why would you want to use the excuse that since film isn't always 100% realistic,

    using something as ultra-unrealistic as CGI is okay because hey... It's all fake.

    That is such a cop out, I can't even begin to explain how lame that view is.

    You're putting up with mediocrity. We're supposed to be getting better.

    We're supposed to be evolving as humans. We're supposed to at least be able

    to make something as believable in 2011 as we did in 1982 for Christ's sake!

    Realistic is a relative term. You're twisting it to mean what it doesn't.

    I could watch superman fight Zod and it's not necessarily realistic in terms of

    believability but the whole trick with film is to SUSPEND that disbelief!

    And you do that by using all the tools you have as a director.

    You have good stories. Good actors. Good soundtracks. Good editing.

    And why wouldn't you also want to have good special f/x then?

    No matter how ya cut it, it just doesn't add up. It's just lazy and lame film making.

    If I was given 1/3rd of the budget these CGI happy cartoon makers are given

    I can guarantee I'd do something more creative than the predictable ho-hum

    swooping CGIscape garbage that seems to be in all "big" movies anymore!

    I can't remember the last time I saw something that looked halfway real.

    You act like you're fighting the whole point of film and that's to GO WITH IT!

    To suspend your disbelief! To believe! That's the magic of film man!

    I think you just haven't seen enough good films to see in contrast the difference

    between the cash cow contrived garbage of now vs. the actual art of yesteryear.

    And no, I'm not just an old cronie talking. You don't have productions like ALIEN

    anymore where teams of ARTISTS with actual clay and paint build things.

    You can't make everything equal and say CGI artists are just as good.

    You have to compare the final product and when you do... You look at the

    opening shot of Blade Runner and then you look at that THOR crap and it's

    just fucking obvious that no one today has any artistic merit.

    They've been handed everything on a plate already, given all these tools but

    not had to earn the ability to use them. Stifled environments force creativity.

    That's why there's no creativity today - everyone is handed everything without

    having to earn it. Why learn to play an instrument when idiot DJ's are making

    millions pointing and clicking together so-called songs? Why learn to paint

    or sculpt when a computer can do it for you? Today's so-called artists have

    no incentive to actually LEARN and go that extra mile to make it work...

    To be able to self critique and stand back and say "That doesn't look right.

    It's unacceptable. We're going to have to find a different way of doing it."

    Plainly put, many of today's so-called artists are simply candy fed spoiled

    whining babies with fanboy fetishes who simply do not have the maturity

    or attention span to go through the necessary steps require to refine

    their skillset and become actual masters of something.

    You want me to lie. You want me to act like it's all just a matter of opinion and

    everything is equal. IT ISN'T! Take a look man. If you can seriously compare

    what comes out now to what came out pre 90's all the way back to the

    beginning of film then you're deceiving yourself.

    And it's not just CGI that I'm talking about. CGI is just a tool that's over

    used because really, no one knows how to do anything the real way anymore.

    The fucking THING 2011 had sets that looked like sets, prissy pampered

    looking actors who as I mentioned above, you could tell the makeup people

    were touching up all throughout the film. Not a hair was out of place.

    Film makers just DON'T CARE anymore. WHY? Because people like you

    who try to tell them that it's okay to me mediocre and second best.

    People who continue to go to the theater and support this garbage.

    Video gamers who basically are only looking for something to look as good

    as a cut scene in the first place so they can have fan boy fetish circle jerks

    over what super hero can beat the other one up.

    THE STANDARDS ARE LOWERED. The first step in changing something is to

    admit it exists. If people will just be honest and admit that what I'm saying

    is true then they'll have the power to change it. If they remain complacent,

    they're just robbing their own selves and this generation of the pleasure

    that only real true blood and sweat art can bring.

    Reply to Talkback

  • id say it was better than Alien 4 but not as good as A3 (but then Cameron is biased as A3 killed off all his characters)

    id have to say best to worst (out of *****):
    Alien (*****)
    Aliens (*****)
    A3 (***)
    AvP(***)
    AR (**)
    AvP:R (*)

    hopefully by next year it will be:
    Alien (*****)
    Prom (*****)
    Aliens (*****)
    A3 (***)
    AvP(***)
    AR (**)
    AvP:R (*)

    Reply to Talkback

  • That shit was liquidy, set in real footage, seamless, and many people thought it was makeup/practical effects.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 3:58:23 PM CST

    District 9

    by mentaldominance

    And I agree - District 9 looked great in the theater but like everything else,

    when you put it on 1080p HDTV at home you can tell.

    Don't get me wrong - District 9 was fucking brilliant and I loved it and I give

    kudos to all areas of the film making from direction to story to acting to f/x.

    But for every 1 District 9 there seems to be 1000 THE THING 2011's and

    Planet of the Apes and whatever cartoon they're pimping at us currently.

    I don't think ANY special effect technique will replace practical effects man,

    why are you on such a bandwagon for CGI? I don't get the love.

    It's like all these people goign "just you wait! it will be the end all soon!"

    Well... No it won't. NOTHING will ever be the end all.

    What works is using these various tools in ways that makes the film work.

    No technique will ever be the end all. CGI has more weaknesses than practical.

    It stands out WAY more. (with few exceptions - obviously I like District 9)

    But we're still missing the point because as I mentioned above, there are many

    variables that go into a good film and a good film makers knows which tools

    to choose to maximize the film and he also knows how to use those tools

    and he knows how to look at his film objectively and be honest and admit

    when shit doesn't look right - regardless of why - and fix it.

    Just seems that 99% of the time the reason why anymore is POOR CGI.

    And also - some things are just fucking pointless. I hate this idea that everything

    will be done in the computer. Yeah sure it will. It already is. And it looks like shit.

    You're not admitting the computer's strengths and weaknesses, you're acting

    like it's some Godlike entity that will eventually solve all film problems.

    It's not. It's just a tool. An over used tool. A tool that will allow the most skill less

    hack to make something that makes money in this retarded society.

    There is no excuse for adding CGI breath instead of just filming in the cold.

    There is no excuse for adding CGI blood when it never looks real and such

    low tech simple solution such as squibs exist.

    Even if the computer COULD make it look real, it's still pointless to use it when

    doing it the old way looks so much better and is WAY fucking easier.

    It's like they don't want to take any time anymore to even shoot things in

    physical reality. They just want to get their name actors scanned in and then

    complete the film in the computer. That's fucking bullshit and evil.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Just like how only Raiders of the Lost Ark was any good and all the sequels are inferior drivel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 25, 2011 4:14:40 PM CST

    lv_426

    by warrenbishop

    Where are you man? A thread about 'Prometheus' and you don't have a comment? That doesn't even seem right.

    Given the lack of good sci-fi in movies or tv, I'm going to get my fix from literature. Considering "Woken Furies" or "Hyperion" next. Anything you can suggest that's as good as "House of Suns"?

    Warren

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 12:01:14 AM CST

    @darth_kong, everyone else crapping on me for wanting R

    by wookie_weed

    Why the fuck is Ridley still shooting an R edit for a bluray release?

    Why the fuck would Lindelof bring it up at Comic-Con?

    Because PG-13 isn't what Ridley wants. He wants R. But he's shooting PG-13 because FOX owns the franchise and it was the only way he could get the budget for real sets instead of green screens.

    Ridley IS shooting R. But we only get a bluray, and don't get to see it in cinemas. if you think Ridley is happy about it, then you must think Harry writes good reviews and has good health.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 12:34:33 AM CST

    *It's*

    by darth_kong

  • http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/prometheus?before=1312225070

    Maybe the Gun Turret thing the Jockey grew onto in ALIEN is for charting stars in the galaxy?

    Like a compass for finding it's way?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 5:18:03 AM CST

    release the PG-13 version in 3D and the R version in 2D

    by cartmanez.

    there ive solved the problem

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 5:43:14 AM CST

    new trailer description

    by cartmanez.

    http://www.avpgalaxy.net/2011/11/26/exclusive-new-prometheus-trailer-description/

    sounds like the best film ever made

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 6:46:20 AM CST

    darth_kong, interesting theories and symbolism

    by lv_426

    I never thought of the derelict as a woman's legs spread eagle. The vaginal-like doors were always obvious.

    Maybe the space jockey society is matriarchal? Could explain why the alien queen is, well, a queen. Also, maybe the space jockey aliens being a matriarchal race could tie in with those fertility idols that primitive mankind fashioned?

    Maybe humanity's overly patriarchal ordering of society over the majority of history took over after the matriarchal space jockies left humankind behind for whatever reason, hundreds of thousands of years ago?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 6:54:21 AM CST

    warrenbishop

    by lv_426

    I commented in this talkback several days ago. I guess this one is still going on, but with Thanksgiving and all, plus being sick, I haven't paid much attention to AICN.

    At least an alien chestburster didn't explode forth from the turkey yesterday. Or would that make it a turkeyburster?

    As for some good science fiction literature, I haven't read anything new that I can think of off the top of my head. I still need to pick up that zombie novel Zone One, which you had recommended. Maybe this week while I am Christmas shopping.

    There is an interesting sounding new sci-fi novel coming out December 20th. I just saw it on Amazon the other day.


    "Count to a Trillion"

    http://www.amazon.com/Count-Trillion-John-C-Wright/dp/0765329271/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1322311809&sr=1-1


    It definitely sounds interesting. I figured you might find it worth a look too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 6:55:06 AM CST

    darth_kong

    by alan_grant_lives

    Sounds like a proper Avengers 2 anime subtext surrounding a giant vagina (that needs to be exploded) and ant-giant man/hulk there.

    The Giant Head? The Elder Gods or statues-impressions of them. Like err... the folks at the end of Runaways Series 1, for example. So as im sure it's been pointed out many times before, the moneys on Jockey having a intergalactic role as one of those fella's.

    I still want my cremaster cycle-Space Jockey movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Except it's creepy in that Total Recall that Martian Bar Girl has three breasts.

    It would be scary to see a woman with three vaginas.

    At least for me anyway.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Maybe Ridley will take the same ASEXUAL Reproduction idea that the Dracs used in Enemy Mine?

    I'm a sucker for that movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 8:52:34 AM CST

    mentaldominance

    by mcgootoo

    you spend a lot of time disagreeing with people who agree with you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 9:00:07 AM CST

    Ratings game settled- now shut the fuck up

    by mcgootoo

    But I want this PG-13 movie to be R-Rated, it would make for a better movie....


    Ok, cool. Then, really, why not hope that the PG-13 movie is rated NC- 17? Wouldn't that make for an even better movie?


    NC-17? Whaddya fucking nuts? I want the movie to have an audience, dummy.....



    Oh. I see....

    Reply to Talkback

  • And really, it's quite obvious where the inspiration for the ship design and specially the entrance where the Nostormo crew enter nto. It's quite vagina looking.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 9:27:06 AM CST

    Asi it gets worse...

    by darth_kong

    Scroll down to the bottom pic.

    Space Jockey Chair Turret Barrel thingy looks like a Penis.

    http://andyfilm.com/mboard/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3179&start=30

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 9:29:03 AM CST

    Asi the cave entrance to the AMPULE ROOM...

    by darth_kong

    It looks like a spread open vagina during an examination.

    Some people say it's a face at the top but it kinda look like a clitoris.

    http://moviecarpet.com/2011/07/06/new-photos-from-the-set-of-prometheus/

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 1:18:43 PM CST

    CGI and Practical effects working together have proven to be the way to go.

    by the green gargantua

  • Nov 26, 2011 1:26:21 PM CST

    FOR EXMAPLE: Lets say I wanted to make a LIVE ACTION UROTSUKIDÕGI?

    by the green gargantua

  • Nov 26, 2011 4:56:25 PM CST

    dont look like PG-13 to me....

    by cartmanez.

  • Nov 26, 2011 7:26:02 PM CST

    Wait until you see the R bluray

    by wookie_weed

    Then you'll wish it had have been released in cinemas instead of the PG-13.

    Of course, Sir Ridley has a history of saving director cuts for dvd releases and more money. ;)

    Dammit, Australia has an MA15+ to bridge that big gap between PG and R -- release it here, Ridley!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • You guys are overreacting a little.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 26, 2011 7:31:02 PM CST

    Space Jockey/Alien gif

    by wookie_weed

    Gif of someone jumping onto an alien/space jockey.

    http://bit.ly/sp8Hil

    It's Cthulhu!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 28, 2011 4:44:26 AM CST

    it's possible darth_kong, and also Jockey as dipicted in Alien

    by alan_grant_lives

    could very much be seen a chained Promethius under sentance/punishment - only they eat his guts out and spawn from the inside every day only for him/her/it to be healed...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 28, 2011 4:44:39 AM CST

    depicted

    by alan_grant_lives

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback