Craig Brewer's FOOTLOOSE is fun in all the right places--and until you've seen it, reserve judgment!!!
Hey everyone. Capone in Chicago here.
Remakes are a tricky thing. No shit. We complain when, for example, a classic horror film is updated and tricked out with unnecessary backstory. To paraphrase Patton Oswalt's quote about the STAR TREK prequels, just because I like something doesn't mean I want to know how it was made. At the same time, if a filmmaker is too faithful to the original, the gripes then become something along the lines of "Why did they bother remaking that?" The third camp ("All. Remakes. Suck") is at least easier to define. And I'm guessing that filmmaker Craig Brewer (HUSTLE & FLOW; BLACK SNAKE MOAN) isn't a big fan of remakes either. But here's the thing: once you see his take on Footloose, the 1984 film that made Kevin Bacon a star, you'll instantly realize that he re-did this tale of a small town that has banned dancing because he's its biggest fan.
The updates in Brewer's FOOTLOOSE are minor and ultimately they don't made a difference in whether or not I liked this undeniable crowd-pleaser that relies as much on fan memories of the original film as it does on simply getting audiences tapping their toes, sometimes to the same songs that populated the monster soundtrack nearly 30 years ago.
The most startling addition to Brewer's FOOTLOOSE is the opening dance to the original Kenny Loggins' theme song. And while we hear all about the post-dance horrible accident that killed several high school students in the original film, in this new version, the accident is (tastefully) shown, and for some reason it makes a big difference. The tragedy is more immediate, and the town's reaction (led by Rev. Moore, played nicely by Dennis Quaid) doesn't seem quite as unwarranted. This is a town that wants to protect its children, and it will do anything to make that happen. It doesn't take a political science degree to see that Brewer is commenting on America and its perceived tendency in the last 10 years to overreact to potential danger. And he pulls off this message without having to change much at all with the plot.
Actual professional dancer Kenny Wormald plays Boston transplant Ren McCormack, who comes to town after his mother dies of cancer to stay with his aunt and uncle. He's a bit shocked at the not dancing/no loud music laws, but his rebel stance attracts the attention of the reverend's daughter, Ariel (Julianne Hough of "Dancing with the Stars" fame, who actually does a solid job acting as well). And if you know the original film, you know how things fall into place. Ren and Ariel flirt, her scumbag boyfriend (Patrick Flueger from MOTHER'S DAY) gets jealous, the kids protest the no dancing rules so they can have a end-of-year dance, and Ren makes an impassioned, bible-quoting speech before the town elders to bring back the dance.
The legendary "angry dance" is still present, but it's slightly altered so that Ren is actually crashing into the machines and random debris that is cluttering the empty warehouse. And the sequence in which Ren teaches his new best buddy Willard (Miles Teller) to dance is practically a shot-for-shot redo. As the ultimate FOOTLOOSE fan, Brewer is keenly aware of what works from the original film and what needs a boost, and the darker edge he brought to his previous two works serve him well at bringing some poignant drama to the proceedings. I was particularly weirded out by a sequence in which Ariel's boyfriend pressures her to have sex, and then she gives in so he won't break up with her. Sadly, this is probably a more realistic take on such situations in today's world.
But I keep coming back to one crucial point about FOOTLOOSE: it's wildly entertaining for the plain and simple reason that Brewer loves the material. Wormald isn't the greatest actor the world has ever seen, but his big speech near the end of the film is delivered with just the right amount of fire. And his dancing is undeniably impressive. I liked the friendship that develops between Ren and Willard; I bought that these two guys would look out for each other, and Teller is especially strong here.
Here's my one and only challenge to you: Watch before you react. See the film before you dismiss it. You don't have to like it, but you at least have to give it a fair shake before you bad mouth it. I know too many people who walked into the new FOOTLOOSE skeptics and came out fans of the work. I think you will too. It's time to remember what being pleasantly surprised feels like. And then it'll be time to dance.
Follow Me On Twitter
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
+ Expand All
Oct. 14, 2011, 1:47 a.m. CST
Oct. 14, 2011, 1:52 a.m. CST
Do you think someone who just really detested the original will enjoy this? Does it stand on its own?
Oct. 14, 2011, 1:58 a.m. CST
Oswalt talks about the Star Wars prequels.
Oct. 14, 2011, 2 a.m. CST
by Roger Moon
Oct. 14, 2011, 2:03 a.m. CST
I'm guessing her turd cutter looks fan-fucking -tastic popping right out at you.
Oct. 14, 2011, 2:04 a.m. CST
by Andrew Coleman
This MTV garbage needs to die! These reviews seem to be pussy footing around the real issues. Like the lead looking horrible and should only play villains. Also a Footloose remake needed to change the main theme. A town outlawing dancing and partying would make news... With facebook and Twitter the story would explode. Also the theme is about older generations trying to hold other people to their values which is fucking wrong... This and the Thing remake are trash. You see it you're supporting the bullshit suit system. Fuck these movies.
Oct. 14, 2011, 2:42 a.m. CST
anything else I'm missing?
Oct. 14, 2011, 2:49 a.m. CST
Everybody cut! everybody cut...!
Oct. 14, 2011, 3:26 a.m. CST
There's one thing to be said for a remake of a 1984 movie that uses the original's screenplay. This 2011 version is so similar — sometimes song for song and line for line — that I was wickedly tempted to reprint my 1984 review, word for word. But That Would be Wrong. I think I could have gotten away with it, though.
Oct. 14, 2011, 3:34 a.m. CST
by Roger Moon
and it hurts me
Oct. 14, 2011, 3:51 a.m. CST
So I have no choice. I guess it's payback from me taking her to all the Marvel and Bayformers movies this summer:)-
Oct. 14, 2011, 3:53 a.m. CST
I got dragged to a screener of this, it is the absolute worst kind of paint by numbers generic remake crap
The fact that AICN has been pimping this lazy cash in excuse for a film so hard is just yet another embarrassment that will be used by talkbackers as a stick to bash the site's diminished credibility with for many years to come.
Oct. 14, 2011, 4:14 a.m. CST
Oct. 14, 2011, 4:16 a.m. CST
So I will reserve the right to say that this blows, and the 'hot girl' in it has an annoying voice. So no, I don't have to see it, thanks.
Oct. 14, 2011, 4:49 a.m. CST
Now, where the hell did I put my Sunday shoes?
Oct. 14, 2011, 6:35 a.m. CST
...still don't mean Imma see it.
Oct. 14, 2011, 6:36 a.m. CST
Oct. 14, 2011, 6:40 a.m. CST
Oct. 14, 2011, 7:29 a.m. CST
By never going to see it or rent it.
Oct. 14, 2011, 7:32 a.m. CST
goddamn I miss fun music in movies.
Oct. 14, 2011, 7:48 a.m. CST
As a kid I hated the original and thought it was ricockulous that a town would ban music this is a useless remake and you may have to turn in your nerd card for asking us to watch and mistaking Star Trek for Star Wars. I have loved this site for years but we may need to start a occupy aicn protest
Oct. 14, 2011, 7:57 a.m. CST
Why do you bother reading and commenting on articles for films you have no interest in? You really need to get a life, since you having nothing better to do than troll message boards. The new film is very good. Deal with it.
Oct. 14, 2011, 9:47 a.m. CST
That does not mean I'll go see it, but I won't prejudge it, and hell, if my little sister tries to get me to watch this with her when it comes out on DVD, I won't resist. I like that this is getting good reviews. For one thing, unless someone truly loathsome is attached to a movie (Uwe Boll, Ratner, Channing Tatum, etc), I don't necessarily enjoy seeing movies get bad reviews. This flick seems relatively harmless, Blake Shelton (guy that redid the title track for this) is a guilty pleasure, and I like the idea that kids going to see this won't be going to see pure shit, just harmless fun. Again, don't plan on seeing it, but I'm glad that when my mom inevitably asks me what I've heard about it (she asks me what I've heard about pretty much any movie she's considering seeing and if I've heard it sucks, she won't go see it) I can tell her she would enjoy it.
Oct. 14, 2011, 9:48 a.m. CST
... so I'm just going to call the author a "fag" and then go watch an Adam Sandler movie.
Oct. 14, 2011, 10:33 a.m. CST
'Listen to me, that footloose is out there, it doesn't feel pain, pity, or remore, and it absolutely will not stop until you are dead!'
Oct. 14, 2011, 10:56 a.m. CST
And I'll hate this one. There is dancing. What's NOT to hate?
Oct. 14, 2011, 12:08 p.m. CST
None of the reviews I've seen have mentioned it, none of the previews included enough to know . . . what the Hell is it? Is it "Footloose, remade with the same or similar music" in which case - meh, don't care, might Netflix it someday if I'm bored enough. Or is it "Footloose remade with that repetative talking-to-the-beat electronic shit that this generation calls music" in which case - no way in Hell I'll even watch this trash and GET OFF MY LAWN!
Oct. 14, 2011, 12:40 p.m. CST
by Cletus Van Damme
I'll remind you that you're in the AICN talkbacks, sir.
Oct. 14, 2011, 1:14 p.m. CST
I've always liked him, he's taking interesting roles. Namely Pandorum which AICN utterly ignored....why it shouldn't have.
Oct. 14, 2011, 1:18 p.m. CST
I sampled the CD tracks on iTUNES and it seemed to me 80% of the songs on it are COUNTRY. Id say thats a big difference from the original. "STEP UP" .. this is not. On another note ... where is the remake of RED DAWN? ... Thats what I was watching in those days.
Oct. 14, 2011, 3:09 p.m. CST
it's shit, period.
Oct. 14, 2011, 3:11 p.m. CST
Oct. 14, 2011, 3:57 p.m. CST
Oct. 14, 2011, 4:09 p.m. CST
I love how this site will review an obvious cash-in remake but wont report on Aronofsky finally getting to make his Noah's Ark film
Oct. 14, 2011, 10:48 p.m. CST
What the he'll is wrong with this site? When did all the reviewers become as gay as Harry ?the original was terrible and so is this shit
Oct. 15, 2011, 3:59 a.m. CST
You let zillions of talckbackers hate any and every fucking movie out there, but it is for a Footloose remake that you ask to reserve judgment? Fuck, either you guys are deep into the director's arse or your own judgement has been clouded.
Oct. 15, 2011, 4:01 a.m. CST
You are dead on.
Oct. 15, 2011, 7:27 a.m. CST
I enjoyed Footloose. As a teacher, I can see many of my students enjoying it also. Great movie for the kids and adults to watch together. Loved the director and how he talked about living in Chicago (Bolingbrook) at the AINCN screening.
Oct. 15, 2011, 11:43 p.m. CST
Ask Paramount why a reboot of Footloose was even necessary and the sheepish answer is that the 2011 version cost just $24M and the bosses expected to make their money back this first weekend. But they didn’t:
Oct. 16, 2011, 1:47 a.m. CST
by Eric Dyer
Because I just won't see it. Luckily, most of the U.S. has done the same- only estimated to make $15 million this weekend. Sounds like it will still be a profitable picture for Paramount. I just prefer to keep my memories of seeing the original on opening night. I remember the line of moviegoers stretching outside the shopping center waiting for a ticket (this was before the days of multiple screens). I also remember during a scene when Ariel's parents were in bed talking some kid in the theater yelled out "Where's the beef?". Totally 80's moment- cheesy/good times.
Oct. 16, 2011, 11:57 a.m. CST
If you liked it, fine. But why are you guys trying so hard to endorse (rescue) this film? I call "agenda". Either everybody's trying to protect the director because they like him or the studio's desire to make their money back has long arms and lots of help. I don't know. I just look at that cover... and the trailer... and everything about both screams "DOUCHEBAGGERY". I don't think it says anything about this movie that it's getting good reviews. I think it says more about us. We're starting to settle for the suck. We're starting to get used to these shitty, vapid remakes and we're starting to make excuses for them. The starving hobos are all fighting over crackers now and have completely forgotten how a steak dinner tastes. This is depressing. Come on, AICN. Snap out of it and be the leaders of Occupy Hollywood you're supposed to be.
- Nordling Reviews STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS! Spoilers Abound! You Are Warned! -- 460 total posts 228 posts
- The big screen adaptation of ASSASSIN'S CREED has been given a release date!!! -- 102 total posts 88 posts
- AVENGERS 2 might be filming in SOUTH AFRICA, does this mean that Black Panther is going to be a part of the action!?! -- 295 total posts 49 posts
- Capone reviews STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS and considers the art of messing with canon and why it doesn't bother him!!! -- 432 total posts 40 posts
- Harry gets seriously geeky on the very geeky cool STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS! Can't wait for the next one! & See this again! -- 1386 total posts 39 posts
- Did you guys like RED 2? Oh it's not out yet, well who cares?? Get ready for RED 3 anyways!!! -- 85 total posts 28 posts
- ‘I Am Not Fucking Like You!!’ The 3-Minute Trailer For The Rampling-Enhanced Final Season Of DEXTER!! -- 66 total posts 24 posts
- UPDATE The Friday Docback Calls 'The Name of the Doctor'!! DOCTOR WHO's S7 Finale Arrives This Weekend!! Now With Glen's Ultra-Brief, SPOILER FREE MiniReview!! -- 89 total posts 24 posts
- Christopher Nolan maybe, could be, might be, directing the next BOND film!?!?! -- 496 total posts 21 posts
- Mr. Beaks Reviews STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS! -- 1071 total posts 12 posts