Ain't It Cool News (
Movie News


Britgeek here.

Back in August, I interviewed Welsh film-maker Andrew Jones, the co-writer and producer of the upcoming NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD: RESURRECTION, directed by James Plumb. Principal photography on the low-budget indie horror has just been completed in deepest, darkest Wales, and Jones has sent in three exclusive stills for me to share with you.

Pick-ups are scheduled for later this month, with the movie set for a 2012 release. Here's the skinny on the plot:

In 2012, the deceased have risen from their graves with only one instinct: to feed on the living. As the cities are over run and civilization crumbles, a family take refuge from the undead army in an isolated farmhouse in West Wales.









Follow me on Twitter!

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:18 a.m. CST

    Looks Pretty Low Rent

    by Derek Wildstarr

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:18 a.m. CST

    But will this be good?

    by CodeName

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:19 a.m. CST

    Pretty Boring Images

    by Derek Wildstarr

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:27 a.m. CST

    Is that Brian Cox as a zombie?

    by Marlboroliteman

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:29 a.m. CST

    Is that Rutger Hauer?

    by SydBarretsMyDad

    Im too lazy to look it up....or to care really.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:32 a.m. CST

    public domain means you can remake it endlessly now too.


    i forgot about that. i knew i could make new box art and resell NOTLD if i wanted to, but i forgot i could remake it as well. this seems to be another nearly-straight remake? reminds me of the Tom Savini version in the nineties- which wasn't bad at all.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:33 a.m. CST

    How is this movie relevant? Is it different in ANY way...

    by SydBarretsMyDad

    ....from every other zombie movie with that description? This has been done already. And perfectly in my opinion. Isolated farmhouse. Cities overrun. Zombies. BORING I love zombies, I truly do. But this shit is old.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:34 a.m. CST

    any new prometheus news?


    i read a TB a couple days ago where someone basically told you they'd sent you new scoops and pics- but still no post. that's pretty much the only movie i'm anticipating anytime soon.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:43 a.m. CST

    Can someone please just add the shirtless Tom Savini pic to those 3.

    by welcometothepartypal

    It would at least be more interesting, just sayin'

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:43 a.m. CST

    Is this a high school a/v production?

    by Samuel Fulmer

    Is Max Fisher directing?

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:45 a.m. CST


    by welcometothepartypal

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 11:48 a.m. CST

    These are terrible stills.

    by J.B.M.A.

    No matter the quality (or lack thereof) of the final film, the people touting this should have at least got someone on set who can take a good photo. Most of the camera assistants I know can take better stuff than this. Shit, so can the RUNNERS. This is Iphone level bollocks. Films sounds derivative and shite as well. Another nail in the UK film industries coffin...

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 12:07 p.m. CST

    Starring Anna Farris, Rasheed Wallace, and Rutgeur Hauer

    by Samuel Fulmer

    What a cast!

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 12:09 p.m. CST

    Night of the Living shirtless Savini pics

    by Samuel Fulmer

    That should be Romero's next. A step up from Diary of the Dead to be sure.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 12:12 p.m. CST

    You'd find any way to buff up too though

    by Samuel Fulmer

    If you were a guest at a high volume of horror conventions every year. You never know when the freak dressed up like Cropsy from The Burning is going to go psycho when you tell him your autograph asking price.

  • New Batman flicks? the background, shirtless Savini..Sarah Palin at a podium?? to her, shirtless Savini.. The possibilities are endless.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 12:35 p.m. CST

    Here's the skinny on the plot:

    by Mugato5150

    In 2012, the deceased have risen from their graves with only one instinct: to feed on the living. As the cities are over run and civilization crumbles, a family take refuge from the undead army in an isolated farmhouse in West Wales.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 12:37 p.m. CST, that is some high concept next level shit!

    by Mugato5150

    anyway, why do quotation marks fuck up the posts?

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:03 p.m. CST

    lol @ mugato5150

    by Huey_Freemans_afro

    You read all our minds!

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:03 p.m. CST

    Even the pipe that guy is holding is unimpressive.

    by Huey_Freemans_afro

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:07 p.m. CST

    And isn't "Resurrection" kinda redundant when we're talking zombies?

    by Huey_Freemans_afro

    I would rather rent Alien Resurrection or Tupac Resurrection.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:14 p.m. CST

    The way the guy is holding the pipe is retarded

    by Autodidact

    Fuck this movie!

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:24 p.m. CST

    Please stop

    by Beezbo

    I know it has slipped into the public domain, but to use the name "Night of the Living Dead" is the ultimate low-class move. Call your crappy zombie film something else.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:25 p.m. CST

    Worst pictures ever.

    by paint163

    Are they the best stills they could find to sell the movie??Or is this some kind of joke post that I don't understand??

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:29 p.m. CST

    What an original idea!!!

    by Doug Phillips

    "Here's the skinny on the plot: In 2012, the deceased have risen from their graves with only one instinct: to feed on the living. As the cities are over run and civilization crumbles, a family take refuge from the undead army in an isolated farmhouse in West Wales. " Are you kidding me? Is this really worthy of attention at AICN? Well, I guess when all Harry reviews is Footloose and Pussy In Boots. This site has completely gone down the shitter.

  • looks like they dug up john thaw..

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:35 p.m. CST

    World War Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

    by cookylamoo

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:37 p.m. CST

    Bottom of the barrell z-movie bullshit

    by DonLogan

    These kinds of movies are being made all the time in the UK, US, Europe etc, the only thing is other writers don't bother with them. How about AICN British correspondent interviewing Paddy Considine about his directorial debut? Surely Tyrannosaur is the newsworthy movie release for AICN's readers?

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 1:39 p.m. CST

    Interesting, Ground-Breaking Idea...

    by Read and Shut Up


  • They deserve it. That title is the mark of a true scumbag.

  • For f's sake people are those stupid tag on's the only words available? Oh and of course. NOLD. RISING! Either way Im zombied out. Love the genre but this is the third version of the same story. DONE! FYI Savinis was pretty good. The Potheads and Sig Haig version was a mess.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 2:12 p.m. CST

    If it's nowhere as good as Dead Set, fuck it!

    by Stalkeye

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 2:13 p.m. CST

    Who IS that actress??

    by gotilk

    She's got some wonderful *bedroom eyes*. There are some gorgeous women in this cast. Sabrina Dickens is one of the most attractive women I've ever seen. Will the movie be worth watching? Hell, I'll give any zombie movie a chance. I even watched that one in 3d a while back, that was horrible. Even the 3d was bad. But I'm easy to please when it comes to Zombie flicks. I was one of the 4 or 5 that really loved *Diary*. Which reminds me. I still want to see *DAIRY of The Dead*, featuring rabid, fast zombie cows set on eating humans AND other cows. I just want to see cows running at high speed with huge eyes, making that panic-moo sound. High comedy. I dare ya, close your eyes and visualize that and not laugh.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 2:14 p.m. CST

    the guy with the pipe..

    by nolan bautista

    ..looks like a customer in my store (buys 40oz Olde English)

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 2:16 p.m. CST

    and congrats to Tony Bennet (last picture)

    by nolan bautista

    a new album plus a plum role as a zombie..

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 2:24 p.m. CST

    Uh, NO

    by OliverOnions

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 2:31 p.m. CST

    Chick looks like Linetrap

    by DangerDave

    If you do not know of whom I and return....I will wait. IT'S A TRAP!!!

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 2:57 p.m. CST

    Non creative bullshit.

    by alienindisguise

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 3:23 p.m. CST

    A response

    by Andrew Jones

    Pretty Boring Images

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 3:24 p.m. CST

    A response

    by Andrew Jones

    Pretty Boring Images

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 3:25 p.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    How is this movie relevant? Is it different in ANY way from every other zombie movie with that description?

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 3:26 p.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    The talkbacks are always the best part of this website, very funny stuff as usual! Just thought I'd address some of the points made and get involved in the discussion. Filmmakers should do that more often in my opinion. We will be releasing alot of stills over the next couple of months, so it makes no sense to release your best images first. Plus, it's important we don't give away any spoilers because nothing in this film will be what people expect it to be. I'm very happy that people have assumed this is the same old shit. It means you will have a very pleasant surprise if you see the film. The nature of financing and distribution these days is that a brand name gets funded and released alot easier than something that doesn't have a recognizable title. As a fan, I'm not exactly thrilled about so many remakes either, but this is the industry right now. I can either say "fuck you!" and spend years trying to get a brand new concept off the ground while working in Burger King, or I can push ahead and make a brand name title for financiers that will make them some money and allow me to get new concepts made in the future. I'm sure if you were a filmmaker you'd make the same deal. As for Romero and co. they are worth millions, so this is hardly going to leave them impoverished. All in all, it's great fun to read these comments and I'll continue to get involved. Feel free to ask me any questions, I'm sure they will be as constructive and considered as usual :)

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 3:29 p.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    Hmm, just noticed when you cut and paste other people's comments into your post it just shows up the comments you've cut and pasted! :)

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 4:02 p.m. CST


    by Wacky Packages

    Especially in this case. Setting "Resurrection" next to "Living Dead" is so redundant and boring it shows the lack of artistry behind this project.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 4:04 p.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    Don't judge a book by it's cover.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 4:41 p.m. CST

    Talk about a redundant title.

    by Grammaton Cleric Binks

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 5:48 p.m. CST

    1972 called.....

    by welcometothepartypal

    It wants it's Exclusive Pics back.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 5:56 p.m. CST

    Gotta be better than parts 4 and 5

    by Steve weaver

    Wow!!!! they were so bad they made part 2 look like part 1

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 7:05 p.m. CST


    by phantomcreeps

    So, any hints about, what will be new or refreshing? Or as you put it, a very pleasant surprise. Any nibble or nugget would be nice, because every viewer getting screwed over, even by George himself in the last few decades are'nt going to bite at this even if it has the Night/Dead name. Reminds me of Halloween: Ressurection. Hardcore Horror fans can see right past this. Unless, you entice us a little. Don't need to spoil the whole movie, but just something. Thanks.

  • Andrew Jones is nothing more than a wannabe-Uwe Bolle trying to cash in on lazy name recognition dtv with shit like this and House on the Edge of the Park 2, plus a Manson and Jack the Ripper movie apparently also in the works. And this one is so knowingly awful he didn't even bother to pay for any stunt casting. Yeah, I'm sure this will be a great surprise. Especially if you are deluded enough to think this has any chance of being anything other than amatuer hour made film.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 7:28 p.m. CST


    by phantomcreeps

    House on the Edge of the Park 2? Good god. Where has are beloved horror genre gone? I'm dipping back into the well this Halloween, watching 30's-70's stuff mainly. I don't know who Andrew Jones is, but it seems that new horror directors think us fans aren't devoted and won't see past these obvious pieces of trash. The past ten years for fucks sake have sucked for horror. I enjoyed Saw, Paranormal activity, and especially Trick r' treat, but where did the practical fx and love for this genre go? Sad really.

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 7:51 p.m. CST

    Night of the Living Dead... In Wales?

    by Dazz

    How will people know which are zombies and which are just... welsh?

  • Oct. 6, 2011, 8:20 p.m. CST

    Yeah but...

    by Mars

    can it blend?

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 1:05 a.m. CST

    I'm the only gay zombie in the village!

    by Ciderman

    Looks like a Little Britain sketch to me, well that or a shite episode of Torchwood!

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 3:54 a.m. CST

    I thought that was Jon Pertwee!

    by workshed


  • Oct. 7, 2011, 7:51 a.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    It is very difficult for me to reveal what's so different about it plot wise without spoiling the film. All I can say is if you give it a chance, from very early in the film you will have no idea where this film is going next, because it doesn't follow the standard template of other zombie movies. We also have a return to practical effects in this film, which I appreciate as a fan because I think CGI is massively over used now, particularly in zombie films. As for the Uwe Boll comment, I don't really know how someone can make that judgment before they have seen the film, and I have no idea what that stunt casting comment is all about. I guess that applies for most of the comments here though, everyone is quick to judge which is par for the course in the internet age. If any of you were offered the opportunity to make a Night of the Living Dead film can you honestly say you would turn it down? Of course you wouldn't. For me, I'm very glad that expectations on this board are low because people will be pleasantly surprised when they see the film and realize we've tried to do something different. I wish I could specify what is so different but from minute one the film doesn't go the way you think it will and I think it will have a stronger impact if seen without spoilers.

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 9:25 a.m. CST

    andrew jones..

    by paul burnett

    comes across as a decent, rational human being....BURN HIMMMM!!

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 9:57 a.m. CST


    by Eyegore

    You're the only one posting about Cox. No one is laughing with you.

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 10:22 a.m. CST

    guys stop being cynical!

    by Scottycent1234

    Guys, I was very fortunate to visit the set over the last weekend and all I can say is that I've never seen a crew and cast dedicated to a shoot. I can only assume it had the same enthaustic vibe as the original's shoot or Sam Rami's Evil Dead production. (middle of nowhere, long hours, sticky fake blood) These guys are paying homage while trying to take it in a fresh direction, it's easy to be cynical and just assume everything is shit. One guy was slating AICN UK for not interviewing Paddy Considine instead. That is the wrong type of attitude, to give those with higher budgets and stars the attention, it's shallow and artifical. I'm sure Paddy himself would agree as he started off making films with no huge budgets or well known Actors, Aicn UK is a great platform to showcase new talent. Remember us Brits don't have a thriving industry anymore as we're too pre occupied with kitchen sink dramas and self indulgent art house that underperforms overseas, so as soon as someone tries to do a genre piece with entertainment as being a focus they get slated and that's why we're failing in the industry. Also Wales is a great cinematic canvas being explored all the time by big hollywood studios so being baffled by the film's location has no valid point and shows how some on this thread are uneducated and no how to do nothing but Troll. I'm not saying all of this just because I visted the shoot I'm a passionate and honest as you guys and hate bull shit.

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 11:22 a.m. CST

    @Mr Jones

    by veebeeyes

    I understand that you don't want to spoil the surprises, and I understand that you don't want to show the best scenes so early. However, maybe it'd be a good idea to hold off on showing anything until you've got something that'll get people interested. Think about it like this...three months from now, you might decide to actually show some of the good stuff. A great clip, a few great still photos from the movie, whatever. Me...I'm gonna be more likely to just look at the headline, think to myself, "oh right, that movie", and then skip to the next article without even bothering to see what you have to show. You'll have already lost my interest. So yes...don't spoil the story. Don't show off "the best scenes" so early. But if you (for whatever reason) don't have anything interesting to present NOW, then it's really probably a good idea to NOT SHOW ANYTHING. Not yet.

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 11:35 a.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    Fair point veebeeyes, but if I'm asked to keep people updated I try to do that. It keeps the film on the radar and as cynical as alot of these comments are at least the film is being talked about. Not many other low budget British films are attracting this many opinions at the moment.

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 6:23 p.m. CST

    @Mr. Jones

    by phantomcreeps

    Just the fact that you are responding, and seem quite articulate and passionate towards the product and genre, I will give you the benefit of the doubt. I will check this out and give it a chance. Your best statement, I agree with, which is If I had the chance would I turn it down? No, I guess I wouldn't. I guess my point being is that with a certain name, comes certain responsibility and passion. We as fans and consumers have been handed our asses to many times to just accept a movie, labeled as a familiar horror friend. It's like getting your comfort blanket handed to you, cozy up, and find out your brother pissed on it and is laughing at you. Case in point: Creepshow 3, Day of the Dead (remake), Day of the Dead 2 Contagium, Children of the living Dead, Friday/Nightmare/Last house remakes, Deadtime stories volume 1 and 2 (produced by Romero himself mind you), Gus Van Sant Psycho remake, Night of the living dead 3D, rave to the grave (return) and so on. I Will support you like I said, but was just wondering what stood out differently. The plot synopsis seems like, well, the original.

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 6:58 p.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    phantomcreeps, I agree with what you've said and feel the same way. The 'Day of the Dead' remake pissed me off in particular. What a sack of shite! I loved the original and for me it just made no sense for them to use the same character names and title and make something so shit. With alot of those movies it just seems like they didn't even try. If you're given the opportunity to use a known title you should pay it respect by putting the effort into creating a good movie. Our NOTLD is a mix of familiar and new characters, so we use aspects of the familiar formula but then we turn it on it's head to give the audience more jolts. We're trying to make the concept of isolated survivors in a zombie apocalypse scary again. There's nothing better than going into a movie with low expectations, expecting a certain formula, but then being completely surprised. Wes Craven said the first person who needs to scare the audience in a horror film is the filmmaker himself. An audience should go into a proper horror film and feel like they're in the hands of a nutcase, unsure of where they are going to be taken next in the story. We know we are not going to better the original film, but we are confident we've got a film with genuine scares and I guarantee the audience will be completely thrown by the plot twists. Our characters and situations are also grounded more in reality. We always knew people would throw some shit our way for using the title, so it's up to us to prove that we're not cash-in hacks. Having filmed the majority of the movie and seen what we've got, I'm confident we will prove the doubters wrong.

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 7:22 p.m. CST


    by DonLogan

    I have an ex pat friend living in the US who, i know catches this column on occasion in the hope of reading about great new films coming from the UK. As you know we have a wealth of talent here, Paddy Considine included, who's films deserve the attention of those overseas. The American mass market are generally oblivious to a lot of the UK's film exports (Shane Meadows, Micheal Winterbottom, Richard Ayoade films for example), Reading AICN UK tells our friends overseas nothing about these films, instead seemingly focusing on z-movie bilge like Big Fat Gypsy Gangster. I'm all for giving a platform to the low budget pictures but there needs to be some kind of equilibrium. I'm sure a lot of the crew on films like 'Got to Run' were enthusiastic about the job in hand and worked hard to make it entertaining. The fact is that movie is generally regarded as a piece of shit and just because they were jolly nice people doesn't mean this site would/should give it the time of day over, let's say, Four Lions or Submarine. That said, best of luck to Andrew Jones on his film.

  • Oct. 7, 2011, 8:26 p.m. CST


    by phantomcreeps

    Gotta say I feel a lot better hearing your comments Andrew. I'll keep this movie on my radar. So, is there a us release date? Take care and best of luck to you and all that worked on the film. Peace from Oregon. p.s. Is that Rutger Hauer in that bottom pic?

  • Rip on Paul W.S. Anderson all you want, but his movies are big budget and have scale. This thing doesn't look like it had a budget and some dumbass youtubers are making it.

  • Oct. 8, 2011, 12:12 a.m. CST

    What the hell is this anyway?

    by Verbal Kombat

    You can't make a crappy low budget movie like this and have some second rate actor say, "There coming for you Barbara." and expect us to go gaga. Lets examine what we have here: One actor holding a phone; one actor holding a pipe and an actor with fake blood on his mouth. I'm not gonna abbreviate this: WHAT THE FUCK!?! I want hundreds of zombies, a person with the neck ripped open with some DECENT prosthetics and a few cars and a school bus on fire with some school children hanging out being eaten by zombies. I'm not gonna pay to see this shit or even watch it for free when it comes on cable. THIS is how you ruin a franchise and make every release direct to TV instead of a hollywood blockbuster that plays on 1000 screens.

  • Oct. 8, 2011, 6:20 a.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    verbal kombat, how do you know those things aren't in the movie? Can you usually determine the entire content and budget of a movie from the first three stills released?

  • Oct. 8, 2011, 6:43 a.m. CST

    Low Budget vs Studio

    by Andrew Jones

    I find it funny that people throw the term 'low budget' around on here like it's a bad thing. The best horror movies have always been low budget ones. All of the classic horrors I grew up with and loved in the 70s and 80s were all low budget. A big complaint for horror fans, myself included, is that studios produce these big budget versions of the classics and they have no soul, it's all style over substance. Those movies are also slaves to studio demands, which often rob the film of being daring or different. Our project being a low budget independent production rather than a soulless studio backed affair is a good thing as far as I can see.

  • Oct. 8, 2011, 8:58 a.m. CST

    Fuckin Friday the 13th Remake

    by Autodidact

    God what a piece of shit. Thought I'd drop into this horror related thread to call it out.

  • Oct. 8, 2011, 12:07 p.m. CST

    @ Don Logan

    by Scottycent1234

    Most British Films perform badly any way regardless if they get exposure or not. Some reasons why they fail. 1. Too slow paced, dialouge heavy. 2. dialogue/slang can't be understood 3. Too grim depressing 4. Too experimental 5. Topics only relvant to Britain. Even though I'm a big fan of British films. Shane Meadows is my favourite British director but you can't deny that a lot of our films tick all of them boxes. Those reasons are not my opinion thats actual market research. Sexy Beast for example did well which as you know your user name refers to because it's a gangster crime film and them films sell well while also taking it into another direction. British Film makers need to embrace the genre films and be creative enough to put their fresh stamp on it. AICN UK are doing a fine good job if you ask me and to be fair AICN in general is more aimed at pop culture films and genre pieces like NOTLD. Some times you get the best films with the lowest budget as that's where the creativity really kicks in. I'd rather watch the orginal Evil Dead over any of the glossy by the numbers platinum dunes shite.

  • Oct. 8, 2011, 12:22 p.m. CST


    by dora

    This is why new, upcoming talent has such a struggle to break into the limelight; because narrow-minded twits like you judge before even watching the damned film. You clearly don't appreciate movies if this is how you approach them so why bother commenting because your opinion is invalid.

  • Oct. 8, 2011, 12:29 p.m. CST


    by dora

    and you're SUCH a movie buff that unless it's got a 'classic' title, you won't bother to pick it up and buy it because if it's not all over the cinemas; how could it possibly be good?!

  • So I guess my view is tainted, because that person was not a happy camper, didn't have anything good to say about you or the way you conduct yourself and do business, or about the quality of the film production in general. This person, who I won't name for fear of getting them in any shit, is a friend of mine, and I tend to believe my friends. I also work crew, as many on the talkbacks would know by now, so I know full well that budgets aren't nearly as important to the final product as the people actually in there making the film, their ability, their creativity and demeanor, and the feeling and politics on set. A good set with good people can make great things on very little money, just as a few bad people and an uneasy or unhappy set can destroy a film, regardless of how much money there is to throw around. And I've seen both happen first hand. But you are right in that I shoudn't judge until I have personally seen for myself. I still don't have any faith in this project based on what I have heard, but I am open to being proven wrong, so we'll see...

  • Oct. 9, 2011, 12:06 a.m. CST

    Oh, and one more thing

    by Stegman84

    One of the accusations made against you is that you don't give two shits about horror, or the final quality of the film that is being made, but instead you only used the NOTLD name because you know the brand name recognition factor will guarantee you international (worldwide) sales, regardless of quality, which will provide a big return on your miniscule investment budget. All you need is to get the name out there a bit, so people know you exist, which I guess is the point of you being here, and these pieces on AICN. In other words, you are doing the exact same thing as Platinum Dunes and their horror remakes, only on a much lower budget and scale. Same exact grab a popular horror title and exploit it for quick profiteering schtick though.

  • Oct. 9, 2011, 3:30 a.m. CST

    Death by Power Point

    by Dave

    Pretty sure this is the first time I've ever seen a zombie looked BORED.

  • Oct. 9, 2011, 11:59 a.m. CST

    Is that the chick from Glee....?

    by beefywhore

    I hope she gets eaten by Zombies...not her character in the movie so much as I just want a human being.. to be horribly killed and eaten by legions of the undead.

  • Oct. 9, 2011, 5:11 p.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    stegman84. If you can't name names then you have nothing to back up your accusations. And what are your accusations? That someone wasn't happy on set? If you go on any film set there will always be one or two who have something to complain about. That happens on low budget and big budget film sets, as I'm sure you know. It's easy to make accusations anonymously, if you don't have the balls to name yourself and the "friend" on set then nothing you say holds any weight.

  • You've gone to the upper echelons with this

  • Oct. 10, 2011, 7:11 a.m. CST

    by Andrew Jones

    Well I always try to get to the top in everything I do :)