Cool News
Mulchpuppy really didn't like SCREAM 3, But That Snot-Nosed Pom-Pom Slut Courtney Pierce Really Did!!!
Hey folks, Harry here. If you are wanting to stay virginal regarding SCREAM 3... stay away, while in both reviews they do not reveal the 'ultimate' killer/killers, they do go into the film. Mulchpuppy doesn't like the film at all and wouldn't recommend it to a soul, but That Snot-Nosed Pom-Pom Slut Courtney Pierce really did dig it. And I know that both of these people are not shills for The House That Harvey Built. Also... this next paragraph is about the incident that appeared on TalkBacks yesterday and the truth regarding it.
WARNING.... There could very well be an ASSHOLE that posts the Identity of the Killer or Killers (as the case may be) in the headline of a TALK BACK below.... Scan Down at your own risk. Yesterday one ASSHOLE did this, BUT... And I repeat this... BUT He didn't know what the hell he was talking about and did not correctly identify the identities of the killer/killers. Not to say that it wasn't at least one of those, cause it may have... but it isn't the three names he identified and... isn't three names.
So I'll admit it - I really liked the first "Scream." Still do, actually. I
think it was entertaining, sharp, well-written, mostly well acted, well
directed, very funny and had a good number of twists in it.
"Scream 2" started out well but ended fairly messy with a "where the hell did
that come from" twist at the end that didn't help it very much. But for the
most part it was fairly entertaining.
So I walked into the theatre tonight hoping "Scream 3" would manage to
surpass both of them and do a good job closing the series out.
Well.....that didn't happen.
I never thought I'd type this....but Kevin Williamson is sorely missed on
this one.
I don't even know where to begin on this one. I suppose the skeleton that
this film calls a plot is a good place to start out. I'm going to try VERY
hard to not put any spoilers in. If you want to see the movie with nothing
preconcieved...well, you shouldn't have clicked on this in the first damn
place - I suggest you go elsewhere. Like now.
Okay, those of you who hung around seem to trust me. Thanks for the faith,
gang.
Contrary to plot summaries I've seen, Sidney is NOT in Hollywood working on
the set of "Stab 3 (which is a wholly fictional account of what happened
after the events of "Scream 2.") In fact, she's nowhere near the set of the
film which is where most of the first hour takes place. The cast of the film
within the film are made up of Parker Posey, Jenny McCarthy, Deon Richmond
and a few other people whose names don't spring to mind. Also on the set is
Dewey, who's working as a technical advisor on the film. Gayle Weathers is
there as well for reasons I shalln't reveal at this point. Well, cast members
start getting offed by yet another killer wearing a ghostface mask and it's
up to our wacky cast of regulars to get to the bottom of this.
It was reported a while back that Neve Campbell wasn't on the "Scream 3" set
too long which led to a lot of conjecture that she was going to be killed
early on - nope, the fact of the matter is that she just isn't in a big chunk
of the film. Instead we're stuck with The Arquette family bickering (for
reasons not really given, they're broken up again so basically they're acting
like they did at the beginning of the last film). This wouldn't be a bad
thing if the dialogue was up to par, which it isn't. To spice things up,
people get dropped every ten or fifteen minutes to keep us awake but
unfortunately the murder scenes just aren't very well done.
A lot of the storyline hinges on Sidney's mother, whose murder started this
whole series. A lot of investigation is done into her past and...well...it
just isn't very dramatically satisfying. Also fairly bland is the interaction
of the "Stab 3" cast. They're all fairly annoying (and yes, Miss Indy Queen
Parker Posey is fairly blase here as well). It isn't the actors' faults -
it's the script that leaves them nothing to do but bitch about how they
either A. are too good to be making slasher films OR B. needed this film to
jumpstart their young careers. All this "in the business" shit is dull and
has been better done in a hundred other films.
Then there's Sidney - when we do see her she's haunted by nightmares of her
mother - wow, coincidentally there's a lot of stuff about her mother! It's
all a little too blatant for its own good (though I will admit that one of
the nightmares gave me a surprise Evil Dead 2 vibe. That could just be me,
though.).
The biggest problem I saw with the film is that they tried way too hard to
link the events of the film with the events of the film within the film. Wes
Craven already did this in the last "Elm Street" movie and it didn't work too
well there either. No surprise that here it's just annoying and occasionally
confusing (although there's at least one good gag involving there being three
separate scripts of the film just to throw off the internet sites).
About an hour and twenty minutes into the film we shut it off and had a
little intermission (someone had to go to the bathroom, a few people grabbed
a smoke, whatever). At that point I thought I had a damn good idea as to how
the film was going to end. I also vowed that even if the film didn't go that
way, it'd have to do some serious work in its last act to make up for what
was a fairly disappointing first half. Well, I was wrong on both counts.
The last half hour of the first film was, in my opinion, fairly intense and
fairly rewarding. In the second film, I was surprised and disappointed when I
realized that the film was wrapping up. There was no intensity whatsoever.
The third film attempts to score some intensity, but it just doesn't pan out.
Once I realized the characters were in the final location (it took a bit) I
was disappointed. The setup to get everyone there was rushed and more than a
little sloppy. But when the killer was finally revealed, I was downright
annoyed. When the killer revealed his motivation I wanted to throw my drink
at the screen. "THIS IS WHAT THE FIRST TWO FILMS WERE BUILDING UP TO?!?" It's
not a bad idea, I'll admit. But it's as completely out of left field as the
last movie. I'm not going into more detail on the end than that.
Some other things worth noting:
In one scene, power is cut to the house but the killer faxes them. Um, don't
faxes require a power source as well? Sloppy.
We've all seen the video of Randy in the commercials. It was a smart idea and
actually Jaime Kennedy does a good job with what is essentially a VERY brief
cameo. But the method of how they get the tape doesn't make a whole heck of a
lot of sense.
There are a few funny cameos. I hope nobody reveals them. This means YOU.
I was surprised with the events of the first ten minutes - but it didn't seem
at all like the beginning of the first two films. I would've liked the sense
of familiarity here.
Nice to see Patrick Dempsey again.
All in all, I was fairly disappointed with the film and plan on not
recommending it to anyone.
Yeah, like anyone would listen to me.....
Mulchpuppy
And now... for the exact opposite reaction here's That Snot-Nosed Pom-Pom Slut Courtney Pierce.
The Rules of a Trilogy, as related by the sadly-deceased and sorely
missed Randy Meeks (Jamie Kennedy), involve heaps of exposition and
reevaluating past events with current knowledge, an upped body count, and
stunning reversals. Well, Scream 3 does just that, and for the most part,
quite satisfactorily. As far as other movie trilogies go, it is neither a
kinetic Ewok-fest (the flawed Return of the Jedi) nor a Ripleykilling journey
into darkness (the viscerally beautiful Alien3) nor an evolution and
extrapolation with a new major adversary introduced in the mix (Mad Max
Beyond Thunderdome). What Scream 3 is, is satisfying. After four years and
change and three films, I have grown surprisingly attached to Sidney, Gale,
Dewey, and Cotton.
Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) has been living a peaceful and paranoid
life in seclusion. But when the Ghostface Killer (and no, I don't mean the
gentleman from Wu-Tang) starts making Hollywood twentysomething sushi, she
finds herself in Hollywood, on the set of Stab 3: Return to Woodsboro. The
set is laden with umpteen variations on the typical Hollywood cliché figures:
the wunderkind director (Scott Foley, from TV's Felicity, with really bad
hair), the salacious producer (Lance Henriksen, from Aliens, Near Dark,
Pumpkinhead, and TV's Millennium), the bohunk (Matt Keeslar (from Waiting for
Guffman and The Last Days of Disco), the vapid delicate woman child (Emily
Mortimer, from The Ghost and the Darkness and Kenneth Branagh's upcoming
musical adaptation of Shakespeare's Love's Labour's Lost), the vapid bimbo
(Jenny McCarthy, who does more with this part than she has in any of her
other misbegotten film appearances and shows more potential than she has
since her delightfully surreal MTV show), the token black character for urban
advertising (Deon Richmond, who played the young Eddie Murphy in Raw), and
the police detective who's seen too much (played by Patrick Dempsey, from
Heaven Help Us and the immortal pizza boy/male sex worker epic Loverboy).
Suffice it to say, carnage results.
I will say that the smartest thing for Hollywood to do right now is to
batten down its hatches against the onslaught of Parker Posey. She has always
been one of the most interesting character actresses and indie queens in
contemporary filmmaking (Waiting for Guffman, The House of Yes, Dazed and
Confused), but her turn as Jennifer, the actress playing Gale Weathers in
Stab 3, is a starmaking performance the likes of which the movies haven't
seen since Rupert Everett in My Best Friend's Wedding. To say that Posey owns
every scene she appears in goes without saying. And while Posey steals away
the film, its heart lies with Courteney Cox Arquette and David Arquette. The
big shift in the relationship between the characters of Dewey and Gale are
reflected best in the real-life marriage of Cox and Arquette.Their chemistry
has evolved into a charming bond (laden with the occasional bout of
bickering), and the characters reflect that.
But what these films depend on is strong direction. Wes Craven
understands catharsis, and that is one of the reasons why I think he's an
interesting director. After his Meryl Streep project Music of the Heart, it
is as refreshing as the breath of spring to find him back at the reins of an
engine of terror as revved up as this one. If you've read his original script
for A Nightmare on Elm Street 3 (before it got slashed by
Stephen-King-in-prison-auteur Frank Darabont), you know that he is a firm
believer in upping the stakes for the third outing.
Much had been made in the reactionary post-Columbine minefield that is
recent modern filmmaking of the concerted effort that had been made at toning
down the violence in this film. Truthfully, it is not noticeably any more or
less violent than the last one. There is, however, what has become a
stylistic trademark of the film series, wherein characters address the
nature-vs-nurture aspect of what causes serial murder. The sly subtext of the
film (and series, as it is resolved) is that it has been making its own
statements on that debate in the course of its narrative in a much less
direct way than the characters themselves say it.
Original screenwriter and series creator Kevin Williamson found himself
too busy with both his own directorial debut Teaching Mrs. Tingle and his
now-defunct TV series Wasteland, and the writing duties fell to
Miramax/Dimension's new golden boy, Ehren Kruger (writer of Arlington Road
and the forthcoming Reindeer Games). Does he continue in the spirit of the
other two films? For the most part, the answer is yes. There are moments of
surprising emotional resonance in the film (although nothing as mindblowing
as the Cassandra/Fall of Troy sequence of Scream 2), and an ending that I
dare call touching. Structure-wise, the film certainly benefits from Kruger's
presence. At no point does the film seem slack (an unfortunate flaw in the
second film), and any awkward memories of that film's Scooby-Doo
bait-and-switch ending are banished with this film's conclusion.
In addition, cinematographer Peter Deming has redeemed himself entirely.
Gone is the angular flatness of Music of the Heart, and it appears that he
has relearned what made his work on David Lynch's vastly underappreciated
Lost Highway so striking. Much of this film takes place in very low level
light, and yet the shadows become part of the film. To use the phrase
chiaroscuro would be exaggerating slightly, but it does aptly reflect the
deft placement of light and shadow in this film.
I love horror films. But more than that, I love horror films with good
characters (note: this should explain the vast schism between I Know What You
Did Last Summer and its tragically inept sequel). And I have come to love the
characters of Sidney, Dewey, and Gale. The Scream trilogy ends for the viewer
as it should, with affection and care for its characters, and quite a few
thrills and chills.
That Snot-Nosed Pom-Pom Slut Courtney Pierce.
WARNING.... There could very well be an ASSHOLE that posts the Identity of the Killer or Killers (as the case may be) in the headline of a TALK BACK below.... Scan Down at your own risk. Yesterday one ASSHOLE did this, BUT... And I repeat this... BUT He didn't know what the hell he was talking about and did not correctly identify the identities of the killer/killers. Not to say that it wasn't at least one of those, cause it may have... but it isn't the three names he identified and... isn't three names.
-
+ Expand All
-
Feb 03, 2000 4:22:59 AM CST
Well, what a relief to see that the Talk Back that ruined my cin
by alexandra dupont
....Of course, Harry could be deliberately misleading us to lull us into a state of slack surprisability, eerily echoing the very campaign of disinformation waged by (a) Wes Craven, and (b) in a sort of meta-commentary, the
-
Feb 03, 2000 4:42:22 AM CST
The identity of the killer is... How the hell would I know??
by cereal killer
Since I haven't seem SCREAM 3 yet I certainly can't (and wouldn't anyway) divulge any secrets. Anyhow, I'm really looking forward to this flick. In the eighties I never liked horror films and didn't develope a taste for them until the first SCREAM. I never got into Freddie Krueger or Jason or Micheal Meyers or any of them. Now I even enjoyed the lesser SCREAM-wannabes like "I Know What You Did Last Summer" which had a pretty-good opening half hour. And "Urban Legend" had an interesting premise though its execution needed work. I still say this new wave of horror flicks needs a little nudity, especially the films that have weaker scripts. "Urban Legend" didn't do that well at the box office and it could've seen its bottom line improve by ten percent if they'd just shown Alicia Witt in the shower. Oh well, I read that she's got a nude scene in a guest appearance on "The Sopranos." Guess I'll have to get HBO.
-
I think this whole Scream Spoiler Scandal B.F. Skinner Experiment has taught us a few things. For one, every day that we go online, our fate hangs in the balance, one step away from doom and destruction. Or so the reaction would have you believe. What a fucking joke. I happen to think Scream was funny, didn't see the second one. Who the fuck cares? I know it's the principle of the thing, but c'mon! Go back and read the haywire reactions of every loser on here. I haven't seen anything blown that out of proportion since...gee, I'm going to have to go back to "Lucas raped my childhood" on that one. Were you guys upset that you wouldn't be able to figure out Wes Craven's Sherlock Holmesian ingenious plot twists on your own? Give me a fucking break. It's not like the guy revealed the meaning of "Rosebud", or Laura Palmer's killer. I think it's sad that one little thing like the Scream killer's identity can cause as much furor as the casting of Anakin Skywalker (which, come to think of it, is sad in its own way). Scream3 is going to suck a rhinocerous cock, and this is one franchise that is going to be forgotten pretty quickly. Indiana Jones this ain't. But if you guys enjoy feeding the Soul-Selling pockets of hacks like Kevin Williamson, etc., be my guest. Personally I don't think Wes Craven's done anything of note since Serpent of the Rainbow (although I've been told repeat viewings of People Under the Stairs are worth the effort). Are we that starved for good "horror" these days that this steampile is appealing? Of course, now I'm turning this into yet another debate on the merit of this 90's (and now 00's) trend of the self-referential funny-but-scary teen horror crap that's been unleashed upon our society to lower our standards. I suggest that anyone who is lubing up their genitalia in preparation for Scream3 spends their money on a ticket to "Rear Window" instead. There's a real example of entertaining, funny, suspenseful, artistic moviemaking at its best. Suck on that.
-
...killers that is. In the first nobody expected 2 killers, which made it surprising and impossible to work out given what we were given. While the second's ending sucked, it still had two killers which could be to lull us into a false sense of security for the third film where we would get three killers. People would be expecting 2 at most, so a third popping up might bring back the surprise and unexpectedness of the first film's ending. Plus you got the obvious link of ...Scream 3... 3 Killers!!! But now Harry mentions that the poster from the other day was wrong in mentioning 3 killers, so while I thought I was being clever, it looks like I'm way off.
As to who might be the killer, I thought it might have been a kind of 'Wild things' ending where Sydney and Gale planned out the whole thing to further their careers. After all Sydney wants to be an actress (I think, or was that just a plot rumour) while Gale obviously wanted to be more famous than she was when Sydney's Mom was done in. I felt that Dewey could have been roped in as well to work with either of them (not all three) being sick of his smalltown bumbling sheriff rep, but at least one of the main characters needs to be innocent for the trilogy to work.
But my own outside bet for this and the one that makes more sense for me is .....Neil Prescott!! Sydney's Dad. Look at the evidence... he's always been out of town when the murders start to happen. He would have been involved from the start of the storyline (his wife's death). He'd have been close to all the main characters (except for gale). Now wasn't he held hostage in the first one?? Yes but that could have been a plan to scare Sydney agreed with his partners in crime Stu and Billy. In the second he would have known Mr's Loomis, possibly even becoming romantically involved after both their spouses had an affair with each other. This could have led to him teaming up with her for the second film along with that nobody guy whose name I can't even remember. This would have meant 3 killers in each movie, including (or possibly even excluding which would be cooler) the third film. However Neil Prescott is not mentioned on imdb, so he's not supposed be in this one. But possibly he's uncredited to throw off surfers looking to work out the killers from the cast list (like I did). I honestly don't know who the killer(s) is(are) but that would be the coolest for me. I'm not keen on the idea of characters who we've seen many times get almost killed, being the killer behind the whole trilogy, it wouldn't really make sense and there would probably be huge holes in the previous films when you watch them again after the third. Anybody agree? -
Look. We saw SCREAM. Shock! Horror! Mr X and Mr Y were the killers! We didn't see THAT coming! Then we saw SCREAM 2. Shock! Horror! Mrs X and Mr Y were the killers! We sure as fuck didn't see THAT one coming! And now... SCREAM 3! How on earth will they surprise us now? Sidney did it! No... Gale did it! No... Dewey did it! No... Randy did it! Maybe... Wes Craven did it! In fact, maybe this is like *SPOILER WARNING FOR AGATHA CHRISTIE FANS* Murder on the Orient Express and they ALL did it! *SPOILER OVER* The point is, Wes will have to find SOME smart-ass way to second guess every fanboy, script-stealing, Internet-surfing geek like us. Can he do this and integrate the twist credibly into the plot? Perhaps. I doubt it - he didn't pull it off last time, and one of the reviewers above thinks that he didn't pull it off this time. PERHAPS it would make for a better film if Craven said 'fuck it, the secret's gonna come out some time, I might as well just have the most dramatically satisfying conclusion to who's the killer (probably Sidney) and have done with it. I'm just terrified that in a world where every film's got 'three scripts, to fool the internet', every horror and thriller flick is gonna end up looking like Wild Things. Anybody who saw Wild Things will know what I mean - it was great fun, it had some saucy lesbotic action, but by the time it gets towards the end you're thinking 'Oh PLEASE', and when you watch it on video later the whole thing looks horribly contrived.
-
Feb 03, 2000 5:42:24 AM CST
CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANY OF THE SCREAMS,I'M SO
by dead eye
I hate Scream, no depth to it. Doesn't touch you.
-
How can you say Scream films have no depth and don't touch you, when two seconds previously you claim proudly that you have never seen any of the films???!!!!! That just dont make no sense, gadammit!!! It seems you must have some kind of sixth sense yourself, with you being able to broadcast your opinion to us without seeing the film in question!
-
It's probably Puddy.
-
NG MAN TAT!!! (Bet you didn't see THAT one coming!)
-
Yes I know The Fonz was off'ed in the first flick but hey its a horror movie. Things can come back from the dead.
-
which main character on The Simpsons will be killed on next week's episode!!! Anyone but Moe, oh please dear God, don't kill Moe!!!
-
...the REAL killer is Jenny McCarthy's character. It has to be. She's the only one no one would suspect.
-
ME! a small town white boy from Des Moines....errr...nah...couldnt be, its Norman Bates....thats right, anthony perkins is back! No, this time the killer is an amalgam of stupid plastic Todd macfarlane scream figurines!
-
I posted regarding Scream 3 yesterday, but just so this post is not completely off the topic, I will comment on a comment above. How can you condemn the Scream movies without having seen them? Extolling yourself for having avoided something with which you have no experience (e.g., myself and eating most vegetables) is not an admirable trait. If you're not interested in trying something, that's one thing. But how can you know what you're avoiding if you have no experience with it? (I think you could perhaps make a Zen koan out of that.) I'm not claiming the Scream movies are great, but I found them entertaining. I'll be there for Scream 3 on Friday night, if for no other reason than the fact that the new releases have been a wasteland the last few weeks. (Of course, I never saw any of them, so how do I know? Perhaps I rely too much on the gestalt of reviews.) I digress.
SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS I do not like that they are killing off Maude. She was the most physcially attractive recurring female character. Remember when Homer lusted after her at the dinner party? Does this mean that there will be future episodes centered on Ned's struggles as a single father? Also, if the lure of killing off a character is supposedly a big event to draw viewers for sweeps, I believe that the audience will be disappointed that it is Maude and not someone more prominent. *END SPOILERS* Oh, well. Even Chewbacca had to eventually meet his grisly end. -
I once again pay tribute to your humorous posts, even if they do encourage misogyny. My question: are you looking for a follower whom you can instruct in the ways of picking up women?
-
Feb 03, 2000 2:12:57 PM CST
darthpsychotic: will 1 of you AICN ASSHOLES please post the kill
by darthpsychotic
i would like to see wes craven direct my favorite comic book hero EVIL ERNIE, you see in this picture, evil ernie would be our hero and after mating the hell out of the kevin williamson/WB-type actresses(such as julie stiles,michelle williams)with his big gigantic foot-long unit, evil ernie would then kill them, with his big gigantic foot-long unit. evil ernie would then ride off into the rising moon with his true love ladydeath!
-
Sidney is now in her 80's. She lives in a retirement home when a murderer dressed up in the ghostmask starts to kill, yet again. Sidney is still hanuted by the memories of her mother's, and her friend's murders. She figures that she is responsible for everyones death since the ghost killer ultimatley wants to kill her. So she hangs herself in her room. The End
-
Sidney wakes up on the morticians table. She is STILL ALIVE. She can't believe it. She jumps up, grabs a knife, and starts stabbing herself repeatedly, but does not die. She comes to the sad conclusion that she too has fallen into the same curse as those other "horror killers" like Jason, Michael, and Freddy...she just can't die. Of course the Ghost face killer shows up at the morutary and starts killing....dead people! Sidney kills the killer and finds out...it's Anakin Skywalker! Before he dies he confesses and tells her THAT SHE is really his daughter.
THE END -
Having learned the truth about her REAL identity, Sidney decides she isn't fit for the world so she goes to NASA, hijacks a shuttle, and shoots herself into space...hoping never to return. While aboard the shuttle, she learns there is a crew of frozen people aboard...and THE GHOSTFACE killer. The killer chases Sidney and she trips over a lever that unfreezes the crew. The Crew rejoice in their unfreezing and begin to dance around naked like a bunch of idiots. Several of them sneak off to secret compartments to have sex...since they've been frozen so long and it seems like the right thing to do. The GHOSTFACE killer offs each of the couples, one by one until only Sid is left. Sidney sets the self-destruct button and drives the shuttle straight into the sun. The killer is scared shitless and reveals himself to be....AUSTIN POWERS ANNDDDD DR. EVIL! Austin asks Sidney if she'd like to shag just as the shuttle crashes into the sun.
THE END...THIS TIME FOR REAL -
JAKE LLOYD! C'mon, like this is a surprise. Episode 3, Anakin kills everybody! Search your feelings, you know this to be true...
-
What happened to her?
-
Screech!!!! From Saved By the Bell. C'mon, that's the ultimate surprise killer!!! Zoinks!!!
-
Ive figured it out, everyones talking about who will be the killer in the movie when it opens tommorow well I've done it.
The killer in Gun Point is no other than Oliver Platt! A suprise to many I know. Anyways I hope I didn't ruin anyone's film experience. -
The killer is:
***SPOILER***
***SPOILER***
***SPOILER***
***SPOILER***
***SPOILER***
TUPAC SHAKUR!! HE'S NOT REALLY DEAD!!!! HE'LL BUST A CAP IN YO ASS. Well, a knife anyways... -
yes its true - harry banned me so i am under a different handle. n e ways i e-mailed everyone who sent me hate mail, even harry explaining myself. if u want my explination - just e-mail em...
later
steve -
I read what was supposed to be an early draft of the script but ...let's just say that the trailers i've seen and the reviews I've read show that the movie bears little resemblance to what i read. but...my money's on Cotton Weary. And , as always, be leery of new characters who seem to good to be true...because they generally are.
-
Okay, trust me on this one, I saw the movie tonight because I work at a movie theatre and we screened it early...the killer is...MR. T!!! I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw it!! Instead of using a knife, he relies on brute force and a keen sense of directions in order to pummel and destroy his helpless victims. The whole thing makes sense if you think about it:
1) His favorite color is blue
2) He only uses toothpaste that is approved by the ADA
3) He lost the main event in Rocky 3...he's getting even 15 years later in Scream 3
4) He misses vinyl records and those cool slap bracelets
...I should've seen these things coming a mile away...boy, do I feel like the idiot now :)
I'm sorry to ruin the movie for some of you, but if you're like me, and you LOVE "The T.", hopefully this will get you to put down your A-Team hoola-hoop and convince you to plop your $8.50 down on the counter and tell the fun-loving ticket guy; "ONE FOR SCREAM 3 STARRING MR. T PLEASE!!".
If I have put a smile on just one "T" fan, it's been worth it. Goodnight and Take Care. -
I was excited to see Scream 3 tonight yet I was disappointed a little when the killer was revealed. Here's a hint: He/she is on a network television program. Why am I giving this hint? Cuz it's like midnight and I'm tired.
-
Without a doubt...Gail, Sidney, and Dewey..I'm serious..wait and see...Darth Yddet agrees
-
First of all, SCR3AM is a better title than SCREAM 3, but MIRAMAX doesn't think that would "read" in the Midwest. Whatever. It's neither here nor there, as it doesn't matter what this turkey is called. It is a bad sequel (and the "rules" of the trilogy are even more dubious than the rules of the sequel). So if you read the above spoiler talkbacks, I am sorry. However, at least your disappointment will happen here in this loving environment and not in some dark theater with a bunch of strangers.
-
Blah blah blah.
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 419 total posts 209 posts
- WTF HOLLYWOOD: SOLARBABIES -- 131 total posts 129 posts
- Herc’s Seen Tonight’s Return Of THE WALKING DEAD!! Discuss Also DOWNTON ABBEY, FEAR FACTOR, PAN AM, ONCE, SIMPSONS, DYNAMITE, LUCK, SHAMELESS, BAIT CAR, THE GRAMMYS And More!! Sunday Is Sweeps Day 11!! -- 123 total posts 122 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 124 total posts 58 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 191 total posts 47 posts
- Avid Comic Reader Hercules Does Battle With Tedium During Kevin Smith’s COMIC BOOK MEN! -- 43 total posts 43 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 60 total posts 42 posts
- I am The Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day! No, I’m the Behind the Scenes Pic of the Day! -- 27 total posts 27 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 506 total posts 26 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 77 total posts 24 posts