Logo

Cool News

Pixar's Nov 2013 and May 2014 announced at D23 Expo!

Published at:  Aug 20, 2011 3:31:01 PM CDT

Hey folks, Harry here...  Right now, Quint is in the heart of the beast.   He'll be filling us in soon, but PIXAR brought out Bob Peterson (co-director & writer of UP) and Peter Sohn (directed that crazy cute PARTLY CLOUDY short) and the producer of the INCREDIBLES, John Walker to announce that the November 27th, 2013 Pixar release would essentially take place in a modern day world in which the Gulf of Mexico never had a giant asteroid collide into it, thus taking out the dinos.   No.   Instead, they're amongst us - and this particularly story looks to be about a boy and his pet brontosaur - you can see some of the designs from an old Pixar photo from a couple of years ago:

 

See it there?   Well that's for this film

 

Then, the Pete Docter "May 30, 2014" project - will be a film set entirely inside the Human Mind.  It is being described as being "Wildly Ambitious even for Pixar" - and I have no doubt of that.   Can't wait for Quint to tell us more!



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:33:35 PM CDT

    flintstones?

    by santoslhalper

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:36:40 PM CDT

    Look behind on the wall, betterlooking.

    by theultimatemathteacher

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:37:43 PM CDT

    Inside the Human Mind?

    by theultimatemathteacher

    That could be pretty sweet. My thoughts immediately go to Inception, but I'm sure Pixar will bring us something we've never seen before.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:37:45 PM CDT

    betterlookingthanyou - see the photos on the wall to the right?

    by benbraddock

    That's what Harry's referring to, dumbo

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:38:06 PM CDT

    Fuck yeah on both counts

    by jimmy_009

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:38:48 PM CDT

    Um...that's a clock

    by jimmy_009

    LMAO, did you miss the big picture of a dinosaur with a kid?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:41:06 PM CDT

    Um, I didn't know Up was claymation...

    by theultimatemathteacher

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:43:09 PM CDT

    can barely see anything the photo is out of focus

    by sunwukong86

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:43:14 PM CDT

    You mean the sculpture of Carl that says "Carl"?

    by fuzzy_dunlop

    And that is holding a balloon? Wow, Pixar is really recycling their material...

    ...or Harry's a dumbass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 3:52:47 PM CDT

    Is that photo purposely blurred?

    by bass ackwards

    Or just a bad photo?

    I can't make out a thing in any of those pictures on the wall.

    And its nice to hear Pixar is trying something "wildly ambitious," after this string of revisiting the well of Toy Story 3, Cars 2, and Monsters Inc the prequel hopefully they have enough bank to need to waste more time in the Cars universe or rehashing Toy Story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:00:51 PM CDT

    fucking stupid talkbackers

    by shatners hairpiece

    Look at the pictures behind the model maker on the wall.
    These concepts sound great - anything would be an improvement over the abortion that was Cars 2. Loving the promise of ORIGINAL works coming out of Pixar again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:04:06 PM CDT

    You're two for two Betterlooking...

    by motherfraker

    First you miss the pic, then act like settled science is some sort of Internet rumor.
    An astroid that hit the Yucatan and the gulf 65 million years ago.
    But don't feel bad. Pretty boys just need to look pretty. And this fact's only been known for 25 years.
    Spoiler alter: Hitler lost World War II.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:06:40 PM CDT

    Cars 2 was the most entertaining movie I saw this summer

    by darthvedder81

    That probably says more about the other movies than Cars 2 but I still had a fun time watching it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:09:40 PM CDT

    Really? Dinotopia?

    by smokingrobot

    That's their best shot?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:12:53 PM CDT

    Pixar and sequels...

    by macaeryk

    Sequels make money.

    Pixar use money make good new stuff.

    New stuff entertain us geeks.

    Sequels entertain everyone else.

    Everybody win.


    Somehow, this is a problem.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:13:23 PM CDT

    @betterlookingthanyou

    by syn_flood

    Around March 2010, is the answer to your question. Google "Chicxulub crater"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:24:05 PM CDT

    I don't get what we're supposed to see

    by cruizer dave

    in that picture?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:36:53 PM CDT

    Looks pretty cool

    by mrfloppy

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:37:04 PM CDT

    You just know the intelligent design crowd will eat this up...

    by weylandyutani

    They will probably use this PIXAR/Flintstones Redux as proof that the Earth is 6,000 years old and that people walked with dinosaurs at least until the great flood.

    Yeah... I can be an asshole sometimes. Still, I am looking forward to this - should be fun.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:43:34 PM CDT

    will this pixar film

    by emeraldboy

    have a great opening, you bet! followed by a a very slow and sluggish, 2nd/third act, you bet! and of course a rousing final act which will involve a chase of some kind. you bet!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 4:50:05 PM CDT

    Disney's lackeys with something "new"

    by rupee88

    wgas..they will just make something derivative and overrated like their recent filmic output.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 5:12:11 PM CDT

    do people really have 2 different picture views

    by mr_p

    or is it an excuse for being retarded?

    Over to the jury to decide

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 5:14:12 PM CDT

    Pet Brontosaur

    by desmondo

    Pedantic, but there is no such thing as a brontosaurus. It's called an apatosaurus.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 5:16:59 PM CDT

    PIXAR dinosaurs?

    by d.vader

    Damnit now that sounds GREAT.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 5:38:37 PM CDT

    this thread reaks of retard

    by timahh

    seriously, some of you folks make me sad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 5:42:33 PM CDT

    mr _p

    by terrynation

    It's cropped on the right by the 'top talkbacks' column on my screen, as it apparently is on many other people's too. I'm no computer wonk, so I'm just guessing it has to do with whom you're using- I'm on Firefox. This happens to me all the time on this site; I had to go to Slashfilm to see the pics in question.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 6:13:52 PM CDT

    Google 'the numbskulls'

    by mynamesdan

    not that yeardley smith vehicle- the comic from the uk. that's what i want.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 6:26:58 PM CDT

    do people really have 2 different picture views

    by bass ackwards

    Yes, something about AICNs coding seems to be not friendly to some browsers, the pic is embedded in a way that the "Top Talkbacks" bar on the right of the screen covers the right side of the image, basically cutting it off right at the clock. It wasn't until I clicked it to open it in a new tab that I was able to see the whole image. Before that I just assumed some how some of you were able to make out the blurry images on the cork board.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 6:30:43 PM CDT

    Betterlooking...

    by motherfraker

    Yeah. 1986 sounds about right for that discovery.

    It was even referenced a few years later in a movie about dinosaurs. I think it was called Jurassic Park. It was awhile ago. You might have missed it in one of your modeling gigs.

    Good try with the science journals line. Next time try reading them. The front cover pictures are pretty, but there's good stuff on the inside too. Then stuff in text books won't seem like 'news to me.'

    But keep plugging away. You'll catch up!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 6:45:03 PM CDT

    It reaks of retard, does it?

    by countryboy

    On another topic, something about "alternative history" always annoys me. It's as if the writer wants to do something otherworldy and cool, but lacks the imagination to completely create something new, so he does a "real world" story with whatever fantastical elements he wishes he could write about.

    Or sometimes it seems the writer doubts audiences' capacity to be entertained by anything that doesn't have monsters or aliens or special effects in it, so he adds them to stories where they have no place.

    Either way, it grates on me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 6:45:40 PM CDT

    Pictire "cropping" fix

    by bluesharpo

    For those with a PC, "CTRL minus" the window, and the picture should come full frame, if you're zoomed in then it gets cropped..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 6:45:52 PM CDT

    Picture*

    by bluesharpo

  • Aug 20, 2011 7:11:50 PM CDT

    It's always funny...

    by knowitallfromcali

    When someone misspells a simple, one-syllable word (like reeks) and denigrates mentally retarded people at the same time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 8:39:37 PM CDT

    No Pixar sequels in the immediate aside from Monsters U...nice

    by nasty in the pasty

    I hope that Cars 2 turns out to be an anomoly in the Pixar filmography.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 9:04:58 PM CDT

    Cars 2 made more money than

    by history101

    Thor
    K. Panda 2
    X Men
    Rango
    Rio
    and probably Captain America

    just saying

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 9:12:51 PM CDT

    For Pete's sake give the project a name!

    by seasider

    I don't have a name to suggest but anything but the "May 30, 2014" project. I mean what if they decide to change the release date?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 9:18:52 PM CDT

    Eh, who is actually retarded here....

    by avon

    The assholes stating the obvious (yes we know there is a picture at the back) or the assholes who don't recognise that the picture is fucking cropped for a lot of people?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2011 9:45:41 PM CDT

    Monsters U

    by dkent

    That's the next pixar, right? Set in college? Think it will be more like Revenge of the Nerds or The Social Network, but with monsters? By the way, just read the book Scary School. It really gets the humor with monsters thing right.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 12:03:47 AM CDT

    First black Pixar lead character...

    by leisuredrummer

    guaranteed for this dino movie. And no, not because the photos are brown but because the sculptures of that kid have african american features.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 3:03:02 AM CDT

    I like the ideas

    by dukeroberts

    Will this be like Danny and the Dinosaur? I loved that book when I was a kid.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 4:13:53 AM CDT

    At least they're not sequels

    by supertoyslast

    I was beginning to get concerned about the lack of new original films from Pixar. Modern-day Flintstones sounds interesting but a 'wildly ambitious' Pixar version of Inception is to be savoured.

    Now how's King Of The Elves doing?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 4:17:39 AM CDT

    The image is obscured by the Top Talkback sidebar

    by eveelcapitalist

    Took me a minute to realize. I was confused at first. Wasn't sure if Harry meant the Carl statue or the very obscured photos right next to the guy's head.

    There's more to the right.

    If it hasn't been point out already just right click and copy image location and paste the URL into your browser and voila!

    Nothing special in the designs. Surely they've been worked over a few times by now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 9:26:22 AM CDT

    Ok--got it.

    by fuzzy_dunlop

    Copied and pasted the pic into my photo album just to be sure, and there was the Dino.

    However, all talkbacks are full of dumbasses, but this particular talkback made one of me, admittedly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 1:30:54 PM CDT

    If you can make out any of the photos behind the artist.......

    by velvet_sloane


    .......Then you should go to specsavers because your eyesight is terrible!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 7:20:23 PM CDT

    I have some of my Pixar faith restored

    by ricarleite4

    Seems they are back to the original stuff for the next 4 years, except Monster University, which doesn't seem as much of a bad idea as Cars 2 was. OK, count me in on all of those.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 7:21:00 PM CDT

    BTW, that rumor with Tom Hanks confirming Toy Story 4

    by ricarleite4

    That was just some stupid shit AICN threw around, right?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2011 8:22:47 PM CDT

    Loads of dim people here

    by mattforce7

  • I don’t think we can ever know all the details of what led to the extinction of dinosaurs, which was a long process and probably had many contributing factors, but it seems like there is a pretty strong consensus among paleontologists that the asteroid impact was probably the major contributing factor.

    I like the talkbackers in here who claim to be regularly reading scientific journals in their leisure time. I am an actual scientist and I only read the articles that I have to read for my work, because they are incredibly dull to read. Unless you need to know the exact details of a particular experiment, it’s much easier to get general information about new scientific findings from other types of sources.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 22, 2011 5:36:27 PM CDT

    More like...

    by franks_television

    Scientific American, National Geographic, Natural History Magazine, etc. Plus any number of scientific news websites. All of those sources will break down and summarize the more important scientific findings in different fields. The only reason to turn to the actual journals is if you are a scientist and need to know the specifics of a particular study.

    Some scientists will subscribe to Science or Nature and skim through the article titles to see if there is anything important going on in their field or related fields that they have some interest in, but that’s about it.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback