Logo

Cool News

SUNDANCE REPORT: Coen Sister looks at ISN'T SHE GREAT

Published at:  Jan 23, 2000 6:09:35 AM CST

Here's Coen Sister with her first film of the festival, ISN'T SHE GREAT. Often times the accomplishments of Coen Sister are overlooked by her brothers' limelight lives, but neverthless... she continues forward... a brave soul... setting out to do her thing. And for the next 10 days she's planning on seeing 5 movies a day over the course of SUNDANCE... Let's see if she can survive! Here we go...





ISN'T SHE GREAT

Every once in a great while, a film will come along and surprise you. Not
because it's groundbreaking cinema and not because it affects the viewer
passionately. Sometimes there are just films that you're happy to see don't
suck as badly as you expected.

ISN'T SHE GREAT is one of those pleasant surprises; a somewhat mediocre idea
for a movie with a horribly unfunny trailer that literally made me cringe.
It's not going to win any Oscars and it doesn't present a terribly new twist
on an old story, but it doesn't need to be anything more than it is: a very
funny movie with absolutely charming performances and even a few moments of
true sentiment. It's also the perfect vehicle for the often-misused talents
of Bette Midler and Nathan Lane.

ISN'T SHE GREAT is the true story of Jacqueline Susann, the author behind
VALLEY OF THE DOLLS, one of the biggest and campiest hits of all time. While
never considered a great work of art, VALLEY was the wildly popular and
daring (for 1966) chronicle of three young women trying to become stars and
their escapades with booze, sex and drugs. In many ways, the film is a
lighter version of the great ED WOOD, taking a look at the woman who proudly
created trashy novels, but treating the subject as though it deserves the
royal treatment.

When we first meet "Jackie" Susann, she is coming to the end of a very
unsuccessful acting career. She's been dumped by her married lover, hasn't
had a role in over a year, and seems on the verge of a major breakdown. But
there is one man who believes in her--Irving Mansfield, a grade B manager who
never considers Jackie anything but a star. As played by Lane, Irving adores
Jackie without question or judgement. He recognizes her behavior is
off-putting to some, but he wouldn't have her any other way. They are soon
wed, and it's the supportive Irving who decides his wife should try her hand
at writing. Having pretty much failed at everything she's done so far, Jackie
figures she has nothing to lose. She decides to write what she knows about;
and since all she knows about are sleazy Hollywood characters and drunken
actresses, the result is VALLEY OF THE DOLLS.

Of course, writing the book is only half the battle and some of the best
lines in the film come from the many editors who reject the novel outright.
And when a publishing firm finally recognizes its potential, it assigns a
fussy editor (played by the master of fussiness David Hyde Pierce) to work
with Jackie. The scenes between the wonderfully crass Midler and the uptight
Pierce are easily the movie's high point. But the actors don't just play
stereotypes; and the grudgingly tender relationship that develops between the
two makes for many memorable scenes. In fact, all the performances are
wonderful. With Jackie, Midler has finally found the perfect showcase to be
brassy, vulnerable and hilarious. And Lane is matches her scene for scene
with his endearingly sweet Irving. If there is one complaint, it's that we
don't see enough of some of the characters. John Cleese is sadly underused as
the head of the publishing company that finally sees the potential in
Jackie's book. And as usual, Stockard Channing steals every second she's on
screen as Jackie's longtime friend. I know I said this film isn't going to
win any Oscars, but I might reconsider that statement if Channing was only in
a few more scenes. She is a joy to watch and expertly delivers some of the
best dialogue in the film.

It's no surprise to learn that ISN'T SHE GREAT was written by Paul Rudnick,
one of the wittiest screenwriters working today. Rudnick made a name for
himself writing a hilarious column for PREMIERE MAGAZINE under the alias
Libby Gelman-Waxner and also penned the script for IN & OUT. The director is
none other than Andrew Bergman, who has made the wonderfully understated
comedies THE FRESHMAN and HONEYMOON IN VEGAS. (Of course, he also directed
STRIPTEASE but we'll disregard that one.) As they've shown with their
previous films, they are both experts at taking a slight concept and make a
wildly enjoyable movie out of it. Check your expectations at the door; not
only does this movie not suck, it's a fun and breezy ride.

Coen Sister



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jan 23, 2000 9:13:52 AM CST

    Cools-ville

    by smilin'jackruby

    I love Nathan Lane and I was going to see this despite the earlier negative review. "Ed Wood," eh? Pretty big shoes to live up to, but it looks like fun.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 23, 2000 2:04:25 PM CST

    hmmmmm.....

    by bigdaddymuffla

    This might be alright, although it definentaly deserves the "worst trailer and poster of the year" award. god this movie looked stupid before I read this review...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 23, 2000 4:35:38 PM CST

    Too bad not many more are taking time to read this review...

    by all thumbs

    I wish they would so they could see this movie is all sentiment and writers manipulating the audience. It's about a woman who revolutionized the publishing industry and paved the way for tacky, tacky trash novels. I'd want to see how they handle the making of "Valley of the Dolls" (the movie). And David Hyde Pierce is in it! I'd go see this movie for him alone, especially if his role isn't just a stereotype of Frasier-esque proportions.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback