Capone finds James Wan's INSIDIOUS a great throwback scare film!!!
Hey everyone. Capone in Chicago here.
If I've learned anything after my decades of watching thousands of horror films, it's that the lineage of a horror film (who directed it, produced it, wrote it, stars in it) doesn't mean shit. Sometimes it does, but most times it doesn't. So when I see the guy who directed PARANORMAL ACTIVITY (a film I love deeply) listed as a producer on INSIDIOUS, I shrug and say, "Show me the damn movie." When I see director James Wan or writer Leigh Whannell (who made the original SAW) listed as the director-writer team on INSIDIOUS, I say, "Show me the damn movie." So, I saw the damn movie, and guess what: it scared the crap out of me. It also made me laugh, and it impressed me that stars (and fine actors) Patrick Wilson and Rose Byrne sold me on the heightened drama of this story of a child who is in danger of people possessed by a nasty demon.
INSIDIOUS starts out as a haunted house film. Josh and Renai Lambert move into a new home, and immediately ghostly things start happening--doors open and close, things get knocked over, and noises come from every dark corner. Things get so bad that the Lamberts decide to move. I can't remember another film where a family actually moves out of what they believe to be a haunted house in the first 40 minutes or so. But in the new house, the same things start happening, and before long their son Dalton (Ty Simpkins) is attacked by something in the house. He seems okay, until he lands up in the hospital in something that is coma-like, but not actually a coma. The family eventually moves Dalton back home, where he lays in bed while all hell breaks loose around him.
Eventually Josh's mother (Barbara Hershey) calls on old friend Elise (the great Lin Shaye), who tells the rattled couple that it isn't the house that is haunted; it's their son, around whom a red-faced demon is swarming, preparing to take over the boy's soul. Before I dive into the film's last big set piece, I want to say that INSIDIOUS has more scares than any movie I can think of in recent memory. Yes, it borrows heavily from POLTERGEIST, but it's films like that that Wan and Whannell were influenced by growing up, so that doesn't surprise me. And I'd rather have filmmakers pay homage to their favorite films in this manner than simply produce a substandard remake.
There's a sequence in which Josh must pass into a kind of altered state to save his son, and without giving too much away, these scenes--for whatever reason--have divided people's response to the film pretty much down the middle. When I first saw the movies, without knowing anything about it, I saw these scenes as an homage to the old Hammer Films movies--most of which didn't have big budgets, but they had heart and dry-ice machines for days. You might laugh at this sequence--I probably did--but for a movie that goes to such great lengths to look so good, I doubt the filmmakers decided to switch over to a slightly cheaper version of their movie without cause. The setting is supposed to look stripped down and bare; I think the "cheapness" of the look is intentional.
A big part of the reason INSIDIOUS works so well is its actors. Byrne and Wilson sold me on the terror. They are quality actors, and in lesser hands, I don't think the movie works--no offense to the filmmakers. I also happen to be a big Lin Shaye fan, and to see her get a role this juicy and see her play it straight just warms my heart. There's a sequence in which she stares into a black pool on the ceiling and whispers a description to one of her research assistants (played by Whannell) what she sees. It's an absolutely terrifying sequence, made all the more effective just because of the look on Shaye's face.
Wan is in top form here. Saw was about creativity and gore, and it worked on both levels. But INSIDIOUS is about good, old-fashioned fear, and try as I might to avoid jumping and screaming like an eight year old, I was tense for nearly the entire movie. I actually couldn't believe how anxious I was watching this film. And it's a largely bloodless affair to boot, so it's the perfect date movie. And yes, it's PG-13, but don't let that scare you away. INSIDIOUS truly surprised me, and I was glad to see that this talented group of folks got together and made a scare movie that actually matters, at a time when such films are getting increasingly lazy when it comes to being actually scary. Well done.
Follow Me On Twitter
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
+ Expand All
April 1, 2011, 11:22 a.m. CST
You have my interest...
April 1, 2011, 11:33 a.m. CST
CHOPPAH presents: "The Conspiracy Against AICN," a Special CHOPPAH Investigation by THE_CHOPPAH: Part 1 of 3
I. The Terrible Trio and "The Kobe Project" CHOPPAH has learned, through sources anonymous and hidden, that Mr. Beaks, Nordling and Devin Faraci have been running a long game, using sock puppets to infiltrate and provoke talkbackers into ban-nable offenses to illustrate how Harry has lost control of his site and to purge any malcontents. It's all to usurp Harry, whom they view as a corpulent geek version of King Lear entering his dotage, and assume control of his site, his resources, and connections to turn AICN into perfectly functioning site with police-state-like talkbacks that would increase their personal wealth by whoring itself out to the studios. "It's obvious that Harry uses the site to get 'pweasants' from his studio buddies," one of my sources tells me. "But AICN still has its shaggy-dog, shambling charms. Beaks, Faraci and Nordling have been conspiring to turn the site into a pure revenue-generating machine." Their legion of sock puppets includes: JettL93, lowes forehead girl, chickengeorge, viggeo_morgenstein, william_faulkner and their oldest, most brilliant creation: hey_kobe_tell_me_how_my_ass_tastes, a churlish, thuggish reflection of how the trio views talkbackers. "They called it 'The Kobe Project,' or sometimes 'Project: Kobe,'" another one of my well-placed sources told me. "My God, do they laugh and laugh when they use the kobe_ass_tastes handle, or whatever the fuck it's called." All three of the conspirators share a password to use the kobe name, often at the same time, to infiltrate and rupture talkbacker "groups" such as the Baleback and its eventual offshoot, the Pedalback. Looking back now, using state-of-the-art textual analysis, it is obvious to CHOPPAH that kobe had to be the creation of more than one mind: he is often condescending, snobby, grumpy and despicable all within the space of a few minutes or posts. He is the love-child of a troika of pseudo-intellectual bullies, an avatar of their insidious, arrogant hive mind. But his deranged trio's plotting pushed their conspiracy to even darker territories. Desperate to find the ultimate coup de grace, especially as Harry's health problems grew to a near-critical phase while he was distracted by the Famous Monsters of Filmland website they coerced him into taking over, they despicably seized upon the death of beloved film editor and Quentin Tarantino collaborator, Sally Menke. They would make their power play in Menke's AICN obit. ... Tune in tomorrow for Part 2, "Where's Devin?"
April 1, 2011, 11:42 a.m. CST
Zero out of five stars.
April 1, 2011, 11:52 a.m. CST
The guy is just too good. He was one of the best things about Watchmen. I have always said that although Rorschach is considered the main character by most, it's Dan that is the glue and heart, and Wilson got that.
April 1, 2011, 12:04 p.m. CST
by Mephisto the Great
I have always believed that many horror filmmakers throw in gore and sex because, frankly, they don't have the writing chops to make a film that requires the audience's intelligence. Is there a place for gore-fest horror films? Sure. But it's nice to see someone take the time to create something scary without resorting to lazy writing.
April 1, 2011, 12:06 p.m. CST
but at one point, I turned to my co-host, Slai and said..."wait..is this supposed to be a comedy?" putting red face paint on a guy and giving him hooves doesn't really scare me. the effects were equivalent to a high school stage production. I liked the idea behind the movie, but this just felt like Paranormal Activity with ghosts in period clothing. Oh, and yes, I did like that the family MOVED out of the first house! Afterwards, I wondered if Patrick Wilson did this film as a favor to someone...
April 1, 2011, 12:13 p.m. CST
You have to post in every talkback? You have way too much time on your hands.
April 1, 2011, 12:25 p.m. CST
Happy April 1, Chop.
April 1, 2011, 12:47 p.m. CST
by Spielbergs Furious Racism
HE WAS A QUIET MAN.
April 1, 2011, 12:52 p.m. CST
Come on harry wtf?
April 1, 2011, 2:35 p.m. CST
...is the face of utter blandness. I bet his favourite colour is beige.
April 1, 2011, 2:40 p.m. CST
She's my favorite actress and I love the fact that she hasn't broken out as a cliche leading Hollywood actress. "Sunshine" "Knowing" "Adam" and "Two Hands (Fell in love with her)" she's fucking brilliant!!!! I will be seeing this soon!!!!
April 1, 2011, 8:41 p.m. CST
by The Dum Guy
Not concurrently, and I can't say I care to see the whole thing. Some of the visuals looked creepy and there was some jump scares, but it seemed really stupid.
April 1, 2011, 9:08 p.m. CST
Total underrated hottie.
April 1, 2011, 10:59 p.m. CST
by Raggles Wimpole
Though I have yet to see this movie, so I cannot comment on the actually quality (though the trailers make it look rather good), I wonder if people realize that this movie only cost the filmmakers about $1,000,000, which was about what "Saw" cost. I think you really have to hand it to James Wan, Leigh Whannell & the others that, in an age when the budgets of most major studio films routinely balloon upwards of $50 million, they were able to make films for relatively cheap that actually look professionally-made & attempt to do something different. Ironically, the two large-budget films directed by Wan (Dead Silence & Death Sentence), were his least-impressive, though still enjoyable, so another low budget horror film by him is a welcome addition. And it's PG-13, so you gotta give him credit for having the balls to make a non-R horror film that is actually scarier (from what I've read) than a lot of the R-rated crap being made nowadays.
April 2, 2011, 1:24 a.m. CST
The film was freaky as hell and kept me tense to the point where I wished it would just end to give me a reprieve. They don't let up much throughout the whole thing. However, I can agree that the design of the demon was awful once you got a good look at him. Darth Maul face + hooves = not scary. They should've gone for a more skinless look (keep the red face, but not the one used) and less old-school devil, which ceased being scary sometime in the 1960s. Other than that, it was good, definitely worth the money if you want to shit your pants.
April 2, 2011, 7:56 a.m. CST
by Paul Dronet
I feel like I am completely disconnected from the modern day horror audience. This movie.....is scaring people? THIS movie? Are you guys watching a different version than I did? I don't get it. I'm just going to accept my old age and stick with the ghost movies I grew up with like The Changling, Lady in White, Poltergeist, etc.
April 2, 2011, 11:51 a.m. CST
after the preview screening, i heard all sorts of murmuring from the audience around me as we were leaving..."i have to walk all the way back to my car now!! alone!" "that was so scary!" i was flabbergasted that the reaction was anything other than laughter.. i have to say, i think the unseen terror in the paranormal activity movies was far more scary than the dude in the red make up.. it just felt so ..silly.
April 3, 2011, 4:23 p.m. CST
by Dr. Samuel Loomis
It was given a little and with that it created enough to make your skin crawl. I never and I mean never close my eyes during a movie. The most I've ever done, was plugged one ear just to soften the upcoming blow in the movie but there were times in this movie where I was blinking and keeping the eyes closed a little bit longer than a normal blink. It freaked the hell out of me. The whole sequence near the end where he goes to the further (as they put it) kind of reminded me of the 80's movie Little Monsters, starring Fred Savage and Howie Mandell. The world with the fog and whatnot, I just got that feel, and that brought my inner child out even more than the rest of the movie, which was pure old style horror. I got the feel of Poltergeist and The Shinning as well.
April 5, 2011, 12:11 p.m. CST
The film was creepy in the way "Paranormal Activity" was creepy, right up until they showed the monster. As soon as I saw it I turned to my buddy and said, "Are they serious?" Non-scary monster design + 3 point lighting = not at all scary. And the end just didn't fit with what had happened 5 minuted prior.
- The Next STAR TREK!! Variety Says ATTACK THE BLOCK’s Joe Cornish Is Not Directing And Alex Kurtzman Is Not Writing!! -- 335 total posts 19 posts
- A sequel to JACK REACHER is on the way! -- 77 total posts 18 posts
- Nordling Recaps BNAT 15! -- 129 total posts 15 posts
- The Trailer For The Wachowskis' JUPITER ASCENDING! -- 135 total posts 14 posts
- Jason Momoa to potentially play Doomsday in the upcoming BATMAN/SUPERMAN film!?!? -- 13 total posts 13 posts
- Peter Berg Says No New FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS Movie -- 130 total posts 12 posts
- And The Apparent Title Of The Next TERMINATOR Movie Is... -- 359 total posts 8 posts
- Disney can now make new Indiana Jones Movies!!! But what about Paramount? -- 542 total posts 6 posts
- The Trailer For Jason Bateman's BAD WORDS! -- 25 total posts 6 posts
- Images From Matt Smith's Final DOCTOR WHO Episode - 'The Time of the Doctor'!! -- 64 total posts 4 posts