Logo

Cool News

Roy's faithful steed, Trigger, gallops in with a look at Curtis Hanson's WONDER BOYS

Published at:  Dec 14, 1999 4:18:05 PM CST

Ya know what? Being spanked by Trigger... well.. it turns me on somehow. Whoooooooooaaaaaaa! Just kidding. Ahem... Yeah... Just kidding. Evil Harry wrote that. Folks, here's the first word on Curtis Hanson's follow-up to LA CONFIDENTIAL. Curtis had some problems finding his 'next' project... and for while was even contemplating directing SPACE COWBOYS. However, he decided to do... this... WONDER BOYS, this is a review of an extremely rough cut. So, know that this is not quite the film you'll be seeing when you settle into your seat later next year. But... I'll go ahead and turn it on over to Roy Roger's best friend... Trigger...BEWARE OF SPOILERS BELOW...




Ok Harry... it's Trigger once again. I just got home a few hours ago from watching Wonder Boys rough-cut sneak preview. I wasn't sure if I was gonna submit a scoop for you or not because of your stellar review of End of Days. To be honest, it put me off. I thought EOD was the worst movie ever made. Maybe there was something interesting there, but who could tell the way it was edited? 7 different camera angles of every single scene spliced together so that no single shot stayed on screen for more than a second or two. It was more nauseating than Blair Witch's shaky cam. Maybe I'm being hard on Arnie, but that movie was not an Arnold film - it was just bad. I could go on... But I digress. That's your spanking, now go to your room and think about what you've done.

Alright, so I've decided to forgive you this one time and give you the poop. Once again, I don't know all the names of parties involved and don't feel like looking them up (knowing full-well that your readers will be pissed)... Here goes anyway... Today was a strange day, woke up early and had a few appointments. My father called me during the first one to ream me out in front of my client. That was unsettling. Then the second appointment just kept going on and on and on... we were supposed to be at the theatre an hour early and time was running out. Long story short, we (me and my roommate) made it - just barely... we were among the last few allowed in and the line behind us was long. We had to sit in the front row and strain our necks to see the movie... I still have a headache. Everybody in the film looked short and fat. Michael Douglas and the director and some other actors were supposed to be there (we couldn't see them because we were up front, but we did see some chairs roped off when we walked in), and we were required to dress nice.

Some suit came up to the front to announce in a hoarse stern voice that the film is a "work-in-progress" and that some of the color won't match and the music isn't final and there will be scratches and pops in some parts. It didn't turn out as bad as he made it out to be. Anyway, after the announcement, the movie began...

The movie was "Wonder Boys" directed by the same director as L.A. Confidential (a movie that didn't really do anything for me). It starred Michael Douglas, Katie Holmes, Toby Macguire (I think that's how you spell it - he's the kid from Pleasantville), Robert Downey Jr. (amazing how he can make movies while in the slammer), and Rip Torn (gotta love that guy's name). It starts out with Michael Douglas doing narration (which continues throughout the movie) creating the backdrop for this movie about people. Toby (Tobie? who knows?) and Katie are students of Douglas who is a broken down writer teaching college level writing classes. Douglas looks like shit covered in dirt. Maybe it was the angle I had to view the film in, but he looked really fat and old and he didn't shave. Katie Holmes was looking cute. Her acting was decent and appropriate, but she was playing a student infatuated with her teacher (who she also lived with - they never really explained that either) who was old and fat. Her role was neither believable nor did it have a point. Toby was good at playing a savant type who was despised by his classmates and who couldn't tell the truth to save his life.

Anyhoo... Douglas hasn't written a book in 7 years - since the success of his last book. Actually - he's been writing the whole time, but has yet to finish. He's on page 2612 to give you an idea and it's all pounded out on a typewriter (foreshadowing - duh - one copy? get it?) and he writes in this pink women's bathrobe. It's a sad sight to see an aging fat Douglas standing there in an ugly pink woman's bathrobe. He also is a chronic dope smoker and he suffers from "spells" where he passes out - the point of which I don't know. The opening of the movie also explains that his wife just left him that morning and later we find out that he got the headmaster's wife pregnant through an affair they've been having. Whew... what a shitty life, right? Well, that's what the audience is supposed to feel - but it didn't seem to me any worse than anybody else's shitty life. He had a job, a best selling book under his belt, 2 women who loved him and a nice house to live in.

Robert Downey likes to sleep with men in this movie introduced to us in the form of him being accompanied by a transvestite as he was being picked up from the airport. Downey is Douglas's publisher and friend. He was more of a catalyst than a character. His homosexuality was pointless to the story, but he's played gay before so this wasn't a stretch or anything. Instead of a gay character though, he was playing more like one of his characters from an Anthony Michael Hall movie.

Things take a turn for the worse when Toby shoots Douglas's girlfriend's husband's blind dog (the scene is pretty funny so I won't ruin it with all the details) and steals some Marilyn Monroe memorabilia from a safe in their house. Toby is this weird kid who writes really well and makes all these outrageous claims about his various states of poor living conditions when the reality is that he lives with his wealthy parents in an upscale neighborhood. Downey ends up in bed with Toby (yeah I know I'm misspelling it) which was unnecessary, but oh well... lots of things in this movie seemed pointless. Katie Holmes's whole part in the movie was pointless - this film was based on a book and it was one of those films about a writer where you find out at the end that this movie is the result, cause and contents of the book you are now reading/watching... and I think the writer took some artistic license and added some hot little college student being in love with him to make him look good or to make him feel better about himself. But she did look cute with her vacant stares and her perky little tits. In a predictable (yet comical) scene near the end, Downey accidentally causes Douglas's book (all 2612 pages) fly out of the car and blow away... 7 years of work in the river. It gives Douglas his motivation to take charge of his life and generate a happy ending by getting married to his friend's wife, have a baby with her, finish his book (which of course the contents of are the movie we have just watched), quit smoking dope and shave.

I could tell you everything that was in the movie, but there's nothing to spoil here... it's just a movie about people. Much like American Beauty, it was middle aged crisis type stuff - but it had less edge. There was ample humor and a respectable amount of drama. It was a well balanced movie. Nothing all too memorable, but it wasn't bad. So many movies today are bad. This one was not bad. Was it good? Well - it was good for the type of movie it was. Nothing groundbreaking here. It wasn't cutesy. This is one of the first in a new trend (trends cycle - only thing new about it is that it hasn't been around since the Terms of Endearment and Stealing Home era) of human nature movies about people in realistic situations acting like people act. These movies touch some people in a special place, but most of them strike me as bland slice-of-life stuff. The acting was good enough and the characters were likeable enough (almost) and the story had a decent flow to it. The cinematography wasn't distracting at all. Overall, it wasn't a bad movie. It was a tame American Beauty (in spirit) with a happy ending. Not really uplifting or anything, but just pleasant and predictable.

Trigger



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 4:21:43 PM CST

    Weak

    by pomona88

    This sounds pretty lame. What didn't you like about "L.A. Confidential"? I hate it when people say "long story short."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 4:26:52 PM CST

    Musicians? Wiseguys.

    by l'auteur

    I just saw SOME LIKE IT HOT for the first time. That movie ruled! "Dont look now but the whole town is underwater."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 4:31:55 PM CST

    Thanks for the summary.

    by r_dimitri22

    Why did I keep reading that? Way too much was revealed. Did I miss the spoiler warnings? I ruin movies for myself all the time. There is no point in seeing this now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 4:36:26 PM CST

    L.A. Confidential didn't do it for you?

    by psyberia

    It's only, in my honest opinion, one of the top ten films of the decade. But hey, everyman to himself. I don't hold a grudge against you like you do for Harry and his EOD review. But then again, who can blame you? It DID suck. As for this scoop, it was much appreciated. However, I think I could have used some spoiler warnings here and there. But once again, that's MY problem, not yours. Hope to see more of your scoops here.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 4:47:21 PM CST

    Great...

    by darthjoe

    Now I dont have to see the movie you stupid horse.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 4:58:44 PM CST

    Truer Words Never Spoken, L'Auteur

    by mrbeaks

    SOME LIKE IT HOT plays as well today as it must have when it was released. One of my favorite endings of all time, and, for my money, Marilyn's best performance.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 6:11:30 PM CST

    Trigger....

    by swiss toni

    What do you mean Endo of Days wasn't an Ah-Nuld movie? It was pathetic and shit, as were Batman and Robin, The Last Action Hero and Jingle All the Way. Apart from True Lies it was a typical Arnold film for the 90's.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 7:15:00 PM CST

    hanson, etc.

    by lazarus long

    How can this guy have time to make movies while his 3 kids are touring around the world playing to screaming little girls? Oh, he's not the same--forget it. I don't know if I'd put L.A.Confidental in the Top 10 of the 90's, but I was definitely pulling for it at the Oscars a couple years back. Crowe and Spacey were robbed of nominations, and you just have to give Hanson credit for actually filering a 2 1/2 hour script out of that book. As a big Ellroy fan, I was a little disappointed that some of the connections to the other 3 books in this series were fucked up by some changes (Cromwell's character getting killed, for one), but hey, that's Hollywood. I'm eagerly awaiting Wonder Boys, and maybe it's a good thing that Michael Douglas isn't going to qualify for an Best Actor race that is going to be tighter than Katie Holmes...I think people have forgotten the acting chops of this guy. I guess he's forgotten to...but he acquitted himself nicely in Disclosure ("She harrassed ME!") and was uber-cool in The Game. Segue here; if Fincher winds up doing The Black Dahlia as was previously reported, it is going to make L.A. Confidential look like Ellroy adapted by Disney...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 9:17:01 PM CST

    DOES ANYBODY ELSE SEE THIS AND THINK...

    by jchasse677

    .. that Michael Douglas saw his buddy Jack Nicholson's success with "As Good as it Gets" and say,, "Get me something like THAT, only different?"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 1999 11:37:37 PM CST

    Wow, sounds like an Oscar film!

    by sprocket-bot

    Jeez, how much further down the sewer do some of these filmakers have to go...are we, as a film geeks, so deprived of anything resembling a life that we actually enjoy watching old, selfish, warn-down, pot-smoking, adulterous, pedaphiles go through 3 acts of misery?!?! I for one, am sick of this kind of dreck. L.A. Confidential was an excelent film, not just as a crime-story type, but beyond, it had colorful characters, not losers, not scum-of-society (villians excluded), but characters with flaws, not characters with EVERY flaw!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 15, 1999 12:26:16 PM CST

    Does it get tamer than American Beauty?

    by francie

    If I have to spend the next two years hearing movies compared with American Beauty I think I will slit my wrists sooner rather than later. Am I the only one that found American Beauty simplistic and predictable? It is a sad state affairs when critics love a movie simply because it makes their lives look a little less pathetic. Not that all critics' lives are pathetic, but newsflash - everybody wishes his/her life held more excitement and wonder. This movie didn't tell us anything new about the human condition.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 15, 1999 2:04:13 PM CST

    American Beauty

    by twindaggerturkey

    Some aspects of A.B. were predictable, I admit (of course the homophobe is a bad guy) but when is the last time you saw a movie where the voyeuristic dead-bird-photographing psycho boy turned out to be a good guy? I just KNEW he had to be a villain with those eyebrows of his, but hey, I was wrong.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 15, 1999 5:10:28 PM CST

    Needing a does of *something*

    by sterling wolfe

    Let me say first that I like Curtis both professionally and personally. And *maybe* it was just me being tired, but I gotta tell you, I found this script, despite the buildup, to be a real snoozer, and if they manage to pull out some intrigue and excitement, the more power to them. themachineisdead

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 16, 1999 2:14:59 AM CST

    What came first the chicken or the egg?

    by dead eye

    These so called "Real life type" films are derived from the human condition. Does the media affect the way we act? I mean contestly being subjected to movies like American Beauty affects whether or not you believe it. Was American Beauty just a little stretched? Do people really act like that? Does take AB to give people ideas? So what came first the chicken or the egg?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 16, 1999 12:06:36 PM CST

    Wonderboys if you read the book

    by nmortensen

    I am kind of a fan of Michael Chabon, the author of the book. I hve read Wonderboys as a novel and cannot wait to see the film. I should be interested to see Toby MacGuire as the young man, whose name escapes me. The film sounds like it remains pretty true to the book, but one wonders if Katie Holmes is going to wear red cowboy boots or not. All the homosexual activities are in the book and it allows us to have a colorful, flampboyant character for the movie., Having him jump into bed with Toby Macguire's character allows us to understand why he is such a liar, he is lying to himself about his sexduality. one scene I hope they did not cut out from the book to the movie is the stolen car scene. if it is done well on screen it should be a classic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2010 3:42:29 AM CST

    NMortensen

    by thebearovingian

    Wish you would've followed up and let us know what you thought of the film after you'd seen it. But since it sucked I'm betting you thought it sucked,too, and you left AICN forever, despondent and confused, never to return.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback