Movie News

Marc Webb's Spider-Man will be AMAZING! Plus your first high res look at the full outfit and webshooters!

Published at: Feb. 14, 2011, 2:13 p.m. CST by quint

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. This is a no brainer, but I'm glad Sony's finally pulling the trigger on the title THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN for their reboot.

Not only that, but they released a nice picture of Andrew Garfield in the suit, striking a Spidey-pose with our first clear look at the mechanical web shooters! Click the below picture for the much larger version!

 

 

 

The suit's looking more and more like Spider-Man 2099 to me, but I still dig it. I'm very much in love with the idea of the mechanical web-shooters. I mean, if you're going to reboot Spider-Man you might as well add in some of the comic goodness that Raimi didn't.

I always loved that the limitations of Spider-Man's mechanical shooters handicapped him in a way. One panel that will always stick with me is, I believe, from Kraven's Last Hunt when Spidey uses all his fluid and is knocked off a building. The only way he could stop his fall was by reach out and sticking his hand to the brick wall, but the force of his fall dislocated his arm.

It gives our hero a weakness and will, hopefully, make the action scenes even that much more intense.

Also good call on the title. I guess we'll be seeing this trilogy taking comic titles, which is fantastic. First we have The Amazing Spider-Man and then what? Spectacular Spider-Man and Peter Parker, Spider-Man, right?

What do you guys think?

-Quint
quint@aintitcool.com
Follow Me On Twitter

Readers Talkback

comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:15 p.m. CST

    Please, please, please.....

    by the1980mutant

    Just be good.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:15 p.m. CST

    WOW

    by pinshot

    Man this looks GREAT!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:15 p.m. CST

    WOW

    by xCaptainAmazing

    looks incredible

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:15 p.m. CST

    That...

    by WeLiveStill...OrNot

    ...lokkis a little better than the previous pics and set shot. Thank God for the web-shooters...

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:15 p.m. CST

    The Unamazing Spiderman

    by shutupfanboy

    Why do I think the musical costume looks better? Hiding the cod piece I see.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:16 p.m. CST

    Looks better in the dark

    by Zauriel

    Than it does with the horrible light of day as in those on-the-set shots. Hopefully this movie takes place entirely at night.

  • Ah well... "Amazing Spider-Man" is still the far better title. Nice pic.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:17 p.m. CST

    Perfect title.

    by Kammich

    Back in '04, the rumored title to the sequel was either "Amazing Spider-man" or "Spectacular Spider-man" before they opted for the much more generic "2." So I'm very happy to see that Webb and co. decided to go with the right name here. And also, they're 2-for-2 with studio shots. This looks tremendous, and is a testament to the fact that people need to stop judging this movie off of god damned spy pics.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:18 p.m. CST

    Looking good so far

    by reaper28

    but I'll wait to see it in action in a trailer before I decide whether I'm gonna bother ...

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:19 p.m. CST

    I feel like such a nitpicky fanboy but...

    by skycrapper

    I'm still not digging the blue fingers or the non-belt look of the suit.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:19 p.m. CST

    One criticism I will raise...

    by Chewtoy

    Those gloves are a mess, and make his hands about as easy to make out as a Bay Transformers design. Chopping up the lines of his gloves with random blue bits just makes them hard to read. Poor design choice. Otherwise, as I said, the pic looks good.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:21 p.m. CST

    Agreed Chewtoy

    by reaper28

    I'm getting a Spider 2099 vibe about them ...

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:22 p.m. CST

    Hiding not just the codpiece...

    by TheBigDogg

    But the weird shiny sandals too.

  • i have to see it in the movie in full motion to decide how good it really is.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:24 p.m. CST

    great pose

    by james_cameron_raped_my_childhood

    should be awesome. Looking forward to an IMAX release.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:25 p.m. CST

    Read his hands??

    by barrignite

    Sorry is this Spiderman primarily for the hearing impaired?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:27 p.m. CST

    Spidey 2099

    by MooseMalloy

    I agree with reaper28. I wouldn't be surprised to see those properties made into features some day.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:27 p.m. CST

    Web shooters...ugh.

    by knowthyself

    So he got all the powers of a spider except for the MOST important one? And we have to believe this high school student created one of the most powerful substances on the planet? Right.

  • Will I NEVER get the Spidey movie that I want??? EVER?????

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:28 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man Upgrade 2.0

    by FloatingHolmes

    Snazzier. Razzle-Dazzle! Are these guys on crack!? Marc Webb: "Please let me direct the next Spider-Man movie so I can piss all over the costume and make it mine mine mine!" Does anyone else see a hint of "silver slippers" down in the shadowy foot region?

  • I'm digging the eye's... Remind me of the 70s/80s TV show... Oh well...

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:28 p.m. CST

    instead of web head

    by rur

    They can call him basketball head..

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:29 p.m. CST

    The next one will be named...

    by ByTor

    Peter Porker, the Spectacular Spider-Ham.

  • You know, like the organic webshooters in the last 3 movies...

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:31 p.m. CST

    Looks...greasy

    by jimmy_009

    Like the whole thing got dipped in motor oil at some point and he couldn't quite get it out of all the nooks and crannies. That coupled with the off-colored cod piece and the cheap looking black lines just under the knees make this look TERRIBLE. Fire that costume designer, because it's a joke.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:32 p.m. CST

    AWESOME!

    by Series7

    Can't wait.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:33 p.m. CST

    Too Bad Andrew Garfield is an ugly looking fucker.

    by Papa CaveDweller

    As i watched Social Network I kept thinking this guy is not going to do Peter Parker justice.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:34 p.m. CST

    BTW. Nice Pic, tho.

    by Papa CaveDweller

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:34 p.m. CST

    I, for one, approve

    by ATARI

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:34 p.m. CST

    Looks OK bar the silly flourishes on the gloves

    by The_Motorcycle_Boy

    Typical case of "this will look kewl!" but it doesn't. Will all of people who dumped on the fabulous costume in Raimi's film do so on this, because Webb's costume looks far too advanced for a kid to make than Raimi's ever did.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:35 p.m. CST

    Where does he get that high-tech outfit!??!

    by darthwaz1

    WTF they did this in the last series too! He's a poor kid, how does he get this state of the art sci-fi material for his costume??

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:35 p.m. CST

    Re: Web-shooters

    by Kammich

    I agree that the organic webs were one of the better deviations from the Cameron/Raimi stuff, but there's nothing wrong with returning to the web-shooters. They highlight Parker's budding genius and they're always a good way to ratchet up tension in fight scenes when they break or run out of fluid. And don't immediately assume that Parker is the one who develops them. Parker's parents have already been cast, most likely for flashbacks, but I wouldn't be surprised if they have Richard Parker developing said formula before his untimely death, and Peter simply picks up where he left off and fills in the blanks to finish it. Not THAT far fetched, especially for a movie about, you know... a dude with spider powers fighing a 6-foot-tall lizard.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:38 p.m. CST

    He has amazing powers . . . as a SEAMSTRESS

    by blue_dog

    What a fucking bunch of shit. What more is there to say about spiderman? Fuck you hollywood forever in hell, get a fucking new idea, or at least take an old one and do something new with it. Or, you know, keep up the same shit until eventually only three movies are released each year, Batman, Superman and Spiderman, and each year they tell the same fucking tired ass origin story yet another time.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:41 p.m. CST

    Spiderman Begins

    by Styrophoamicus

    No?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:44 p.m. CST

    nitpics aside...It looks like Spiderman.

    by knowthyself

    As long as it's not the costume from 2099 they can't go wrong.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:44 p.m. CST

    Web of Spider-Man

    by paralyser-pro

    That was the third title when I was a kid.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:47 p.m. CST

    I Think You're High

    by THX1968

    On one hand you call out Raimi on the organic web-shooters, while lauding Webb for throwing in some "comic goodness" that Raimi somehow failed to provide by not using mechanical web shooters. HAVE YOU SEEN THE FUCKING COSTUME!?!? Is that "comic goodness"? I sure don't hail Spider-Man 2099 as a classic comic. As for Raimi, Spidey 1 and 2 was chock full of classic Marvel "comic goodness", web shooters be damned. And Parker's web shooters DID malfunction in 2, or was it 3. Funny, I don't remember giving a shit about the organic web shooters at all. As for the title, who gives a shit? This looks like a big fucking turd.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:47 p.m. CST

    The Amazing Basketball-Man

    by elsewhere

    In all seriousness, I think this movie will be awesome even though that costume has yet to grow on me. Need a trailer stat!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:48 p.m. CST

    Yep. That's Spider Man.

    by Ironhelix

    Wasn't he just in a couple of movies with some skanky bitch?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:49 p.m. CST

    When is this coming out?

    by kafka07

    I thought it was this summer, but no trailer yet, so maybe I'm wrong.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:51 p.m. CST

    What I don't like...

    by Celicynd

    First, The picture conveniently covers up the dark groin area and darkens out his boots so as not to show the WTF inducing silver sandles. The other thing I have an issue with (and it can be seen better with the original shot of him without his mask) is the texturing. It looks like when some artist is feeling lazy drawing Spider-Man in the comic, and decides not to actually draw the arcs between each of the radial webbing lines. His mask and body have just one curve going over each "horizontal" line instead of individual curves betwen the "vertical" lines. Its very lazy looking. I think they could have just toned down all the black/dark indentations textures on the costume, added full texturing of the webbing, and it would have looked 100x better.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:51 p.m. CST

    Notice the shoes ain't being shown

    by donkingkong

    no silver/grey tips ging the sneaker look? Must still be working on it.

  • This is bullshit Raimi got it right and they shouldn't have changed to mechanical webshooters He has spider powers of strength and sticking to walls Why don't they make it he needs fucking suction cups aswell on his hands and knees

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:54 p.m. CST

    Still not impressed with the suit.

    by D.Vader

    Bleh. I need to see this thing in action.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:54 p.m. CST

    Holy Complainers, Batman!

    by Acappellaman

    Will you people shut the hell UP?!? For the love of God, the costume looks like Spider-Man is supposed to look. If YOU made a Spider-Man outfit, would YOU keep your feet unprotected, or build in some kind of protection since you'll, you know, be WALKING and stuff?? I can't believe all the whining here. Crazy! <p> Most importantly, try to suspend reality a little bit. In the real world, are scientists and brilliant math whizzes good designers? No. If a real world genius tried to design their own superhero costume, it would look AWFUL. Most people of that incredible intelligence just can't design to save their lives. But this is based on a comic book, people. If the costume looked like something an actual high school geek would make - red and blue sweats and a ski mask with webs drawn on with a sharpee or something, then you'd complain about it not looking like the comic book. But since it actually looks like the costume from the comics, you're complaining about how he wouldn't be able to afford the materials for it?!? I swear, with some of you Hollywood just can't win. If you hate the costume, don't see the movie. Stop bitching about it. Holy crap!

  • Don't get caught up in (or perpetuate) all the hyperbole. We have no idea if this movie is gonna be any good or not, and we won't know until the film hits the theaters. Ease up on the fanboy pre-release circle jerks.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:54 p.m. CST

    I thought the shoes were stunt man apparel

    by Larry Sellers

    Because no one in his right mind would injure his feet just because someone might critique them as part of the new costume.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:55 p.m. CST

    Awful...

    by Grinning White Skull

    Not only does the uniform look awful in bad light but the aesthetics of the photo itself look cheap and without any imagination. This production just continues to fuck it up with every new shot. Are those webs on the mask or...a grid? Drawn with a ruler? The seams on the gloves look so damn UGLY. This lack of understanding applied to the design (along with the photo having no sense of imagination to enhance its appeal) and the more it moves away from the classic suit's design shows such a cluster-fuck of design by committee. And to my thinking this underscores everything else that has been recooked by too many chiefs in this cinematic kitchen.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:56 p.m. CST

    hmmm how come spidey isnt' straddling a guy in the promo pic?

    by fat_rancor_keeper

    seems like I've seen more pics of spidey doing that than legit promo pics. anyway, seriously - the new image looks great and I dig the Amazing title. It's always been assumed and rumored the movie would be called that so I have no idea why they waiting so damn long to announce the title officially. I'm hoping for good things from this reboot.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:58 p.m. CST

    sensational spider-man?

    by Jubba

  • Although whomever worked on the picture painted the shadows on his feet as dark as possible to keep them from showing up.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 2:59 p.m. CST

    he said "amazing" cuz

    by Jubba

    that's the title....duhhhhh

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3 p.m. CST

    I dunno...

    by Isaac R.

    ..just having a really hard time getting excited about this.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3 p.m. CST

    silver slippers = flames on optimus

    by fat_rancor_keeper

    seriously W T F

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:01 p.m. CST

    Hahaaaaa, braindrain made a funny comment

    by D.Vader

    Oh live tv gibberish is so very funny.

  • I have yet to wear little silver slippers to protect them, however.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:03 p.m. CST

    loserguy3000, the title

    by MattmanReturns

    To be fair, "The Incredible Hulk" also came out round the same time as Dark Knight. And really, what else are they gonna do, call it "Spider-Man Again"?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:05 p.m. CST

    very clever, marketeers

    by soma_with_the_paintbox

    That pose hides the very things that make the costume look like ass: the weird spider emblem whose sole purpose seems to be to emphasize the boy's crotch and his nike trainer type boots

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:05 p.m. CST

    Just FYI, that wasn't in Kraven's Last Hunt

    by Steve Rogers

    The arm dislocation moment happens in the first Puma story - was back in the black costume era. Drawn by Ron Frenz I believe. I'm sure someone cleverer than me can cite the exact issue number!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:07 p.m. CST

    yet to be seen... a few things to nit pik

    by houbou

    For now, the nit pik is... That costume kinda looks very high tech for a kid with no money. With that suit, I can't wait to see how they will explain Spidey's ability to cling to walls etc.. The good... so far.. Web shooters, that's great, it's very much old school spidey. This means that Peter Parker is a whiz/nerd kid. The fact it's not organic means there is a limit. Hopefully, this will somehow be felt in some of the scenes..

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:09 p.m. CST

    Notice they "blacked out" the silver slippers

    by Astronut

    I really hope those ghey slippers were just for the stunt work and not part of his actual costume.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:09 p.m. CST

    Here's the problem with the web shooters...

    by phifty2

    ...Now, when they need tension, someone will just say "Uhhh, how about we have him run out of web fluid?" "Works for me." We KNOW he will run out or they will get damaged and WE KNOW that he will prevail anyway so why not just do away with this lame "tension building" device. And I mean device as "a means to add emotion" not "mechanical device."

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:09 p.m. CST

    loserguy3000

    by MattmanReturns

    Yeah I don't think an overly dark tone will fit Spider-Man, but we'll see. I think each superhero movie's tone should fit the character. The first Iron Man found the perfect comedic balance for that character. The Dark Knight obviously required a dark tone. I know everyone's down on teen angst, but Spidey does need a little of that, as he's a teen... with angst. Just don't overdo it.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:11 p.m. CST

    "Hey! If you look close, you can see hobgoblin in his eyes!"

    by Astronut

    God, remember all of that nonsense?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:11 p.m. CST

    We are going to be able to see his eyes

    by eric haislar

    Looks at the lenses. It's just mesh. You will see his eyes through that. Not sure if i like that or not.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:11 p.m. CST

    Way to read an article

    by Lone Fox

    Ease up on the fanboy pre-reading opinions. Wah-Wah-Wah--wahhhhhhh Still, what do I know. I don't mind the costume tweaks. They're not so far removed from the original. Hell, if you're going to whine about staying true to the original design, he should be in black and red, blue spider on his back, and web wings under his arms. 'Web Of Spider-Man' for 2 or 3. I guarantee.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:11 p.m. CST

    those complaining about the costume

    by elsewhere

    does it not look like something a teenager would throw together? plus think of how much room for improvement this will allow them in subsequent sequels. no need to blow your load on the first outing.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:13 p.m. CST

    whine-bitch-whine-bitch-whine-bitch

    by THE_ONE_MAN_GANG

    this looks pretty sick... going to be good. get over it.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:13 p.m. CST

    My idea about the new costume...

    by Spikey04

    I think they were going for Ben Reilly's Spiderman Costume http://tinyurl.com/6hqunpp I think it would be better if they chose a costume that didn't have to do with clone BS... who knows maybe the Jackal will be the new villain

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:14 p.m. CST

    loserguy3000

    by fat_rancor_keeper

    i felt the exact same way about this reboot months ago as you do now......but now I'm sorta indifferent. I'm just hoping for a decent flick or maybe, just maybe something entertaining. but I think Rami & co. deserved one more shot.... or the spider franchise should have sat on the shelf for a few more years. But of course due to sony having to make movies to retain the rights there's no way they were going to do that.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:14 p.m. CST

    PLUS- those web shooters look awesome up close.

    by THE_ONE_MAN_GANG

    the mechanical web shooters will be the best part of this movie

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:14 p.m. CST

    If not for Bond's gadgets, he'd be so dead

    by MattmanReturns

    A million times over. His dick gets him into trouble. His gadgets get him out of it.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:21 p.m. CST

    so that's what it takes for the new costume...

    by silverdog

    to look good: keep most of it in the dark....hope all the movie happens at midnight. at least they were smart enough to hide the dark codpiece and the fugly spidey-sneakers

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:23 p.m. CST

    Good title and suit definitely looks better than set photos

    by TheMcflyFarm

    Much better title than "The Dark Knight Rises". I seriously hope they change that before release.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:23 p.m. CST

    So how does Spidey....

    by bames_jond

    ....stick to the wall, or any other surface if he is wearing gloves or shoes? Wouldn't that interfere with the sticky quality of his skin. He wouldn't be able to climb anything. The only thing he'd stick to would be his costume, (not to mention he'd stick to toilet paper when he was wiping his bum bum). Superheros are stupid. They take themselves too seriously. And oh yeah, Captain America does a disservice to all those who lost their lives fighting the war for the Allies. I mean really, a freak'n dude in tights with a shield is gonna save the day. I'll bite my tongue here, just in case he isn't battling the Nazis.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:23 p.m. CST

    Looks Good!

    by BlackBriar

    The name was a no brainer, doing without the organic web shooter is a nice touch. Also it was James Cameron idea for organic web shooters when he wrote the script ways back

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:24 p.m. CST

    Bond's gadgets= Jack Bauer's JackSack

    by D.Vader

    They're what keep both heroes alive, but they're still badasses without them.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:26 p.m. CST

    "Most powerful substances"

    by AshMcQ

    Dissolves after one hour. Its just the human part about the spider-man persona. He didn't recieved it because of an accident, he build it himself. Thats part of what makes him so awesome: he is smart.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:26 p.m. CST

    You can debate

    by thecheesegrommit

    all day Web shooter or organic but those arguing that "we're supposed to believe this high schooler could create these devises"....really?!? that's your argument. Aside from the silliness of arguing reality in a super powered being movie, the comics well established peters brilliance almost prodigy level mind. Reed Richards who is arguably the smartest mind in the Marvel universe has comment on Peter's genius. Now that I've demonstrated my geekiness, I leave you. Good day!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:28 p.m. CST

    it's a shame Spidey 2 didn't get this title

    by mr teaspoon

    As was originally planned.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:28 p.m. CST

    Looks like a modified wetsuit...

    by invincible88

    Maybe he bought a wetsuit and dyed it and customized the shit out of it....That could explain how he has this rad rubber suit that no teenager could possibly make...then again if he can build webshooters.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:28 p.m. CST

    web shooters

    by longloaddropper

    I was watching a dvd the Spidey Cartoon from the nineties over the weekend. They explained that somehow the spider bite imprinted into his mind the idea of how to create the web shooters. I dont know if that was ever in the comic.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:30 p.m. CST

    Looking forward to reboot of this...

    by Andrew Coleman

    Just kidding... Well sort of. I feel like all this movie can do is fail. The way they are approaching it is making me feel like their meetings have gone like this: "Instead of amping up the action and making it close to the comic, lets try and connect the story to teens instead. So make it like Twilight, focus on the love story and how much of a teen parker is."... "Who should be the villain?"... "Who cares through in the Protogoblin... None of the tweens will care.". I could be wrong but hiring Webb still bothers me. Reminds me too much of Tim Story. I feel like they want him because he made a indie movie that tweens thought was an "edgy romance story". Still to get this right all they need is strong action scenes. Make the Lizard the crazy monster we all think of when we picture the villain. No corn ball bull shit(Peter dancing or acting emo). Also make Spider-man talk shit and crack jokes during the fights. That is my Spider-man. Raimi only did this a little bit in Spider-man 3 but I think that was to set up that he was becoming an arrogant prick. Spider-man does that to make his opponents react. What I love about Spider-man is that he is over matched pretty much 100% of the time. Either by strength or technology. He makes funny remarks to make his enemies over heat or make a wrong choice so he can defeat them. If Webb and the writers do this they will be one step ahead. If they make Peter/Spider-man a cold/angsty/tortured sole(Really trying to make him Edward from Twilight) they will fail.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:33 p.m. CST

    swordfleece

    by BetaRayBill07

    Maybe he should have multiple arms and or legs too?? Jesus. I honestly still think this will be ok at best, but can we not complain unless there's something to complain about?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:34 p.m. CST

    "It's a shame Spidey 2 didn't get this title... BLAH BLAH..."

    by Astronut

    OH WHO CARES

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:35 p.m. CST

    Running Shoes

    by earl of sandwich

    He looks like a big running shoe! All new running shoes have that same breathable, meshy fabic.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:36 p.m. CST

    Correction to earlier post, re: AMAZING

    by jawsfan

    Duh. I get it now. "Marc Webb's Spider-Man will be AMAZING" is a reference to the title, not to an expectation of the finished film's quality. Brain cramp. Sorry guys. I'm a little slow this afternoon.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:37 p.m. CST

    I CAME

    by la_sith

    twice

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:38 p.m. CST

    The Dick-Sucking Spiderman

    by Majority

    That's what he looks like he's gonna do...when he's not getting blown by production assistants a.k.a jamming his dick in there mouths

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:41 p.m. CST

    LOVE

    by labcreature

    I love the new live action suit so much...just *slightly* more than the black symbiote one in Spider-Man 3 (which I love too).

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:43 p.m. CST

    I think the costume looks fine.

    by blackwood

    If you look real close in his eyes, you can see the reflection of SOULLESS CORPORATE GREED. I'll wait for a trailer to make my final declaration that this film represents everything wrong with movie making and people excited for it represent everything wrong with people.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:43 p.m. CST

    I'm Still Not Excited

    by kevinwillis.net

    But mechanical web shooters? Yes. Glad they got back to that. Never bought Raimi's objection to them (he's good at science, too!? who could believe that?) . . . That being said, if I don't catch it at the theater, I will definitely do the DVD.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:45 p.m. CST

    spider gadgets

    by matchesmalone2380

    Maybe having the webshooters will also include other spider-gadgets, such as the spider-tracers. As long as they don't include the spider-mobile, the shooters will work. As for the costume. Remember when x-men came out, and instead of the regular costumes, everyone bitched and whined about the leather suits? Yet the first 2 x-men movies turned out well (the less said about the last stand the better). The costume won't play a factor as long the movie is good. I'll reserve judgement for the trailer before complaining about this movie.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:47 p.m. CST

    HATE the eyes and mechanical web slingers...

    by ccchhhrrriiisssm

    Sam Raimi had both of them right (and not much else outside of Spidey 2).

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:52 p.m. CST

    Amazing Spider-Man; Spectacular Spider-Man; Web of Spider-Man

    by BilboRing

    Would be the trilogy names. I just have no hope for this series. I hope I am wrong. I like the web shooters, despise the costume, and hope that Spidey actually has spider sense this time around. Not just here and there. I don't even think he had it once in the third movie. It's his most important trait.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 3:52 p.m. CST

    i still hate the X-Men costumes

    by elsewhere

    and I think the first X-Men movie is pretty terrible. The second one is good, but I still long to see Wolverine in yellow.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:02 p.m. CST

    That's a pretty nice image

    by D o o d

    but a good image does not a good movie make. I'll wait till there's actually good feedback for the movie, or I'll just save my money for the next Jennifer Lopez flick! ;o)

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:02 p.m. CST

    I am sorry, but this looks like West Coast Customs made it.

    by Snake Foreskin

    It looks more airbrushed than a Victoria's Secret model or a Tijuana whore... which, incidentally, could be one and the same. I think the Spider-Man 2099 reference is correct. I cannot help but think this costume looks like an adult (though admittedly high-dollar) Halloween costume version of the Spidey outfit. And the web shooters are okay, but I actually liked the way Raimi made it an organic facet of the radioactive spider bite. And don't forget, Peter was handicapped by his organic web shooters not firing correctly in one of the movies. So don't kvetch too much about Raimi's choice not to slavishly follow the comics. Let's face it, the comics are silly.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:03 p.m. CST

    What I REFUSE to understand however...

    by BilboRing

    Why can't these stupid fucking Hollywood hacks just follow the fucking comic books? The fans love the characters from the comics. None of us want some dick slugger Hollywood clown to make his or her own version of that! Just follow the fucking comic 100% and you got your perfect comic-based movie. Am I wrong?? It's not like the comics are deeply engrossing storylines like Lord of the Rings. They're fucking comics. You can't follow a fucking comic for a movie? Pathetic.

  • ...very much missing the pre-Internet world right now...

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:04 p.m. CST

    Mechanical webshooters is silly

    by Sardonic

    I'm not a big fan of this suit. And I'm not the nitpicky comic-book fanboy type either, I'm pretty accepting of almost everything. But this suit just looks...messy, like they tried too hard to make it different from the last movie. The last costume was perfect.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:04 p.m. CST

    TOO DARK!

    by Snake Foreskin

    Who does he think he is... Batman? Or Superman from the horrible Superman Returns movie? Spidey should be brighter, less "gritty". Stan Lee ain't gritty. He's colorful. Spidey should be colorful, you dolts!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:06 p.m. CST

    The only way this could be worse is if Bono and The Edge were involved

    by Snake Foreskin

    And Julie Taymore was directing. YIKES!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:15 p.m. CST

    he does look like Spidey2099

    by yeti

    I thought this after the first couple of pictures they released all they're missing is the cape

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:15 p.m. CST

    The web on the mask is gone!

    by templesweeper

    Did you guys notice that? The lines on the mask look more like a checkerboard with squares. There are no more curved lines to make it look like web. Lame.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:16 p.m. CST

    I sure hope he has a sadistic choice to make in this one!

    by Snake Foreskin

    Aunt May's nip is showing while she is serving Peter and Mary Jane breakfast. Does Peter<p> a) Avert his eyes and continue to eat his oatmeal without telling her?<p> b) Let Aunt May know about her wardrobe malfunction, thereby embarrassing her in front of guests?<p> It's these sorts of deep, meaningful moments that will set this Spider-Man film apart from its lesser predecessors. Or not.

  • Spiders don't have "sticky skin" and they don't "stick" to surfaces. They have minuscule hook-like hairs that they use to climb surfaces with.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:21 p.m. CST

    Mechanical webshooters are awesome!

    by Nerd Rage

    The coolest gadget in comic book history, shows Peter Parker's genius is essential to him being Spider-man, and a perfect analogy of how human ingenuity (technology) and nature's ingenuity (animal defenses/instinct) mirror each other.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:24 p.m. CST

    I don't like the fact the feet are blackened out.

    by Nerd Rage

    Looks suspicious. But other than that and the blue fingers/stripes the costume looks great. The black around the eyes look great as do the black webbing (as opposed to raised silver webbing).

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:26 p.m. CST

    Actually Raimi's natural web shooters hardly worked...

    by cookylamoo

    In Spider-Man 2 because Spidy was having an identity crisis.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:27 p.m. CST

    Amazingly unnecessary reboot!

    by bat725

    Boycott, all the way.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:29 p.m. CST

    No offense, but...

    by cylon_conspiracy

    Some of you guys sound like the gay "fashion correspondents" they have on the E! network for the Oscars and such. I even saw a comments complaining that you COULDN'T see his crotch in this image, that they are "hiding his crotch"..... let's get our priorities straight. Gloves, crotch, and shoes. Really minor things. I think the suit looks like it's made for getting beat up and probably stabbed and shot at. It looks like armor, which makes total sense. It's not a spandex bicycle outfit. Also, I think the "silver slippers", though to DIE for, are just stunt-men gear. But even if they aren't, who cares? What is he supposed to do, wear Converse? Air Jordans? In a comic book it can look like he is wearing red socks in the grimy streets of New York but in a real world setting, especially since he's making TOUGH FALLS on the concrete at a fast speed... come on. Batman's suit looked functional and like it could be made in the real world. Same thing they are doing with Captain America, and now this Spider-Man outfit.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:31 p.m. CST

    They're hiding the shit they know we don't like!!!

    by Johnno

    Like the silver shoe lines and the awfully distracting red lines on along his leg. Think you can pull a fast one on me, eh Sony??? Everything else about the costume looks great. Hopefully you can spend more money digitally altering out the stupid parts of that costume. Or I'll forgive you if by the end of the movie, Parker discards this costume after it gets all torn up and he alters his next costume to be the nice clean and simple one we all know and love. Then everything will be fine and dandy. It's a simple solution that I offer you here free of charge. Don't blow it!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:34 p.m. CST

    Terrible

    by Yaroh_Meringue

    The suit in the Raimi films was one of its strengths. This is just a silly redesign for its own sake -- probably to sell more toys. I hate the straight grid on the mask. It's how four-year-olds draw Spider-Man.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:41 p.m. CST

    organic webshoterz ftw!

    by vulturess

    they better not kill off uncle ben this time. fu raimi.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:44 p.m. CST

    RE: Puma Storyline

    by spidermansilvershoes

    dislocation occurred in ASM #256....not sure why he was out of web fluid though. Dude had the black suit on....must have forgotten which one he was wearing or something.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:44 p.m. CST

    TITLES for the New Trilogy

    by Henry Fool

    The Amazing Spiderman<br /> <br/> The Spectacular Spiderman<br /> <br /> Web of Spiderman<br /> <br /> Since Lizard is the villain in the first movie, I think the other two films should feature Kraven & Green Goblin followed by Doc Ock and Sandman.

  • And so did Spiderman in the Raimi films. But in the marvel Universe (at least, according to my 80s era Marvel Encyclopedia) there was a change in the molecular structure of Peter Parker that apparently allowed him to become "magnetic" to any other surface. Which isn't consistent with every story line, but apparently that was the explanation. From SuperHeroStuff: ""No one knows exactly how Spider-Man's wall clinging ability works. Peter Parker has often theorized that he has a form of bio-magnetic power that allows him to increase the attraction between the molecules in his body with those of the surface he climbs. All that is known for certain is that he can stick to anything. No matter how smooth or slippery a surface may be, Spidey can attach himself. He just has to keep concentrating until he can bond with it. Unlike his spider-sense, the web head's clinging power is strictly a conscious act. He can never stick to something by accident. He must deliberately press his hand to an object and chose to adhere to it."" That's sounds very similar to what I remember from my youth.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:45 p.m. CST

    A sad meh from this quarter...(agreed w/johnno)

    by DonQuixote

    I am looking forward to seeing this movie like every other one of the webhead's faithful fans, but I must say, this movie has had the single most disappointing series of "reveals" that are supposed to build up excitement for the final product. I have to agree with johnno's comment about the apparent strategy being one of attempting to actually conceal clear looks at the suit as much as possible (and not for good, "tease" oriented reasons). I'm sure another fan may have already offered this, but my armchair idea would have been, had they really wanted to shake up the look and still please a good many hardcore fans, to make the suit exactly resemble the look of the vintage '60s cartoons--you know, where the facemask, hands, and feet have detailed webbing, but the rest of him doesn't? I've been pretty well pleased (as a fully adult comics fan) by the Captain America & Green Lantern campaigns....this? Not so much. But then, I guess I'm not exactly the "target" audience anymore...or am I? (I see a lot of expensive comics toys owned by many people my age)

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:50 p.m. CST

    a new trilogy......

    by fxmulder35

    UGH. Give it a break boys. Reboots after movies are 5 years old. Hollywood is TRULY bankrupt in the creative sense! Enough already!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:51 p.m. CST

    The costume looks like it was sewn from...

    by HarryKnowlesNonExistentInceptionReview

    ...very well-used, greasy old basketballs. I still say a hearty "meh"!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 4:52 p.m. CST

    Side by side on how it should be : http://tinyurl.com/4fuajkm

    by tbdeinc

    http://tinyurl.com/4fuajkm

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5 p.m. CST

    quint made a compelling case for organic webshooters

    by Orion

    I just wish they didnt mess w the costume design.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:02 p.m. CST

    Who the fuck are these people

    by Nigel_Coolbeard

    who say that mechanical webshooters are shit? Take it up with Stan Lee, you miserable fucks. Clearly they're good enough to endure 50 years of publications, cartoons and media. Raimi got it right? No, he, in fact, got it wrong. Jesus christ with these fucking people.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:02 p.m. CST

    THAT COSTUME LOOKS GREAT!

    by ZOMBRE

    Now that they hid the black crotch, sliver slippers and and giant red cock pointing chest arrow. This costume sucks and a dark photo hiding the BADLY DESIGNED suit changes. I love Spidey and this stinks. Hope its a good movie as i havent seen it yet.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:04 p.m. CST

    That's Netting not Webbing

    by Dridstar

    There's a difference between a spiderweb and a net. His head has a net over it, def NOT a spiderweb. It's also TOO textured. He looks like a basketball. The folds down around his right ankle look like crap too.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:05 p.m. CST

    Make Mine Marvel Studios!

    by bat725

    Fuck Sony and Fox right up their collective asses!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:06 p.m. CST

    Looks 10X better than Raimi CGI spider-man costume.

    by HollywoodHellraiser

    Lets see this 'reboot' has REAL stunts, REAL actors, a REAL Spider-Man costume, and REAL webshooters. Now if they can add in Spidey quips and dialouges than this will be the REAL OFFICIAL SPIDER-MAN Movie! Marc is making Raimi look like the hack that every worshipping fanboy is afraid to admit!

  • like the black dick guard and the silver soles.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:09 p.m. CST

    TBDEINC - That looks great

    by Steve Rogers

    They should have just tweaked the classic Spidey design - some of the changes just smack of change for change's sake and look stupid.

  • And which one of you idiots actually wants to see Spider-Man in an amateur Halloween costume that looks like SHIT? Did Spider-Man's costume look like shit in the costumes? No it didn't, it looked awesome cause it was DRAWN THAT WAY. If faggots like you made these movies you'd be laughed out town, being slapped in the teeth by each and every by audience member.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:26 p.m. CST

    2099??!!

    by killianx

    That looks nothing like 2099! you have no idea what you are talking about there!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:27 p.m. CST

    Go ahead and bitch.

    by Lemure_v2

    Just remember that there's fuck all you can do about it, and you'll all be there opening night. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:37 p.m. CST

    black codpiece is exhaust fumes/comedy scene

    by misnomer

    in a fight with uncle bens killer near a car with running engine, he gets his crotch stained. obvious from the set pics.

  • I couldnt be in the movie business. I would end up going postal on the fanboys

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:40 p.m. CST

    it's "peter parker the spectacular spider-man"

    by Thunderbolt Ross

    not "the spectacular spider-man" and "peter parker, spider-man". The third one will have to be "the muff-diving spider-man" or something like that

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:46 p.m. CST

    SO

    by consoler3

    everyone will have their opinions opening night. Complain all you want. I complain about it, I have my "why is this? Why is that?" but I will be there opening night. As will YOU: Haters, lovers, fans, non fans, movie-goers, non-movie goers, hipsters, directors, so-called writers, record collectors, There isn't shit you can do about it. They will make what they want because THEY are gonna make money. So...just leave it be, for fuck's sake

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 5:47 p.m. CST

    Not very enthused

    by richievanderlow

    1. (and the biggest reason) they appear to be retelling the origin story. That just feels tired to me. It will need to be a significantly different take for me to be ok with it. 2. I guess Nolan has ruined comic movies for me with his penchant for the realistic, because the mechanical webshooters defy logic for a kid to invent, and, for now, have taken me out of the movie. 3. The suit in general looks odd to me. Not sure why If the story is good and execution on screen works, objection #'s 2 & 3 go out the window real fast.

  • Despite fan grumblings, that had a monster opening night, right? It's way too early to guess how fan reaction for this one will shake out... Surely costume tweaks won't make a crushing difference. But it doesn't take that much to derail fan enthusiasm for these reboots. Sony certainly shouldn't think the $100m openings that the other Spidey films have brought are all sewn up no matter what they do.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6 p.m. CST

    Accent piping...

    by jimmy_009

    ...that was the term I was looking for when describing the black piping that adorns this crappy looking outfit and makes it look cheap, like a gym duffel bag. Way to suck, costume designers!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:07 p.m. CST

    Now, I'm quite a positive person.

    by Super Joker

    I managed to sit through Spider-Man 3 and managed to blank out the bad parts and somehow come away feeling somewhat entertained despite the hollow emptiness nagging away deep down. But this was an opportunity to do something fresh. Instead it seems incredibly cynical. Too afraid of distancing itself from the blockbuster Raimi movies (still has a high-tech looking suit) but also trying to fix what was never broken (the actual design of the costume). The result is a 'worst of both worlds' scenario. I would have honestly preferred a shitty looking home-made suit that tried to retain the design and shapes of the comic book outfit but look distinctly home-made. Just a costume with visible seams and looked like an amateur made it would have been enough. Spideys costume is often a source of ridicule in the comics, and would often be great moments of comedy and tragedy where Peter Parker would suddenly have his heroic moments shatterred in moments of awful embarrassment and bring him crashing back down to Earth, and you would root for him even more. Films like Kick-Ass carried that forward, they absolutely nailled that idea of a kid getting kicks out of wearring a costume, being ridiculed but winning people over with his actions - it's a great underdog mechanic. I've always been annoyed that the movie Peter Parker seems to be in constant poverty yet somehow manage to get duds that would make Iron Man jealous. It's over engineered. It's so out of character. I think that's a real problem. It doesn't synch up with who he is, what he's doing or why he's doing it. So far the movies have never got the costume right. I just want to see them try something that is in keeping with the character first and foremost and forget, just for once about selling 'kewl' tie-in action figures to stupid kids.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:12 p.m. CST

    bilboring, I agree about those names

    by SamBlackChvrch21

    because having the 3rd movie be called "Ultimate Spider-Man" would be pretty lame.

  • ...just like Peter would. Granted, it would look like shit, but I can swallow that more than the $20,000 high-tech, polyurethane get up. Bruce Wayne and Tony Stark can drop that kind of dough but Petey should be wearing jammies.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:28 p.m. CST

    People that use "faggot" as part of everyday internet usage....

    by Super Joker

    ....strike me as being so deep in the closet, they're in fucking Narnia.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:34 p.m. CST

    I hate the the suit is 'loose fitting', especially around the legs.

    by Amazing Maurice

    Looks shit. Looks like some fanboy dressed as Spidey for Halloween. For all the hate that Tobey Maguire gets, that guy put himself through hell to get in shape to win that role in Raimi's version. Andrew Garfield looks like his legs would break if he farted.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:39 p.m. CST

    baddass....hope for the best

    by NorthTronic

  • I imagine one day some kid would digitize the films into his computer and super-impose the webshooters back into the Raimi films... And color correct the parts of the costume in the new set of films... Just like some people did with the Star Wars movies... Sigh... Here's hope for coolness to prevail over egos and a$$hole$.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:43 p.m. CST

    people crack me up

    by NorthTronic

    if it would be something that looked like he made it, you fools would talking smack about that too........man, go get laid.-_-

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:46 p.m. CST

    If you're going to compare

    by Dave Catanese

    this crap to a comic costume, maybe look up the costume you use as a reference. The "2099" costume was completely dark blue with a stylized red spider emblem on his chest and face, with a webbing "cape." This monstrosity looks nothing like it.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:49 p.m. CST

    Did I mentioned that I like the mechanical web shooters?

    by bloodawn5

    Seriously, this is the only good thing that we can say about the movie? Mechanical webshooters in a horrible costume

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 6:58 p.m. CST

    Nitpicking aside

    by Nerd Rage

    That costume looks like Spider-man. Think about it, they could've made it look like anything they wanted. Be glad it looks like Spidey.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:01 p.m. CST

    I don't think that's Andrew Garfield in the suit.

    by Subtitles_Off

    I think that's Muscular Stuntman B. Or else it's Suit Guy A. Maybe Suit Guy B, though. He's been doing a lot of curls.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:10 p.m. CST

    "so deep in the closet, they're in fucking Narnia"

    by Subtitles_Off

    That's nice. Simple. Obvious, but I've never heard it before. Wish I'd written that.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:10 p.m. CST

    The "real" suit?

    by rev_skarekroe

    It's the same suit we've already seen, just with better lighting.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:11 p.m. CST

    Actually, scratch that

    by rev_skarekroe

    I misread something. It doesn't say "real" suit at all.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:20 p.m. CST

    So deep in the closet, they're in fucking Narnia.

    by David Cloverfield

    Best post I've read in a while. Never heard it before. If it's a new creation, well done sir.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:30 p.m. CST

    I'll just catch the next reboot/remake of Spiderman after this...

    by spire_walk

    It should start filming 5 minutes after this one debuts.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:31 p.m. CST

    July 3 2012

    by cylon_conspiracy

    That's a long time from now.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:37 p.m. CST

    Hollywood shits the bed. Again.

    by Star Hump

    No web design on his costume, just a grid pattern. Looks like steamed shit. Just one of many fuck-ups. No doubt these assholes thought they were improving the costume. Nah, they cocked this up real good. No surprise there. It doesn't matter anyway. The audience doesn't care. And why should they? It's just junk food moviemaking. It's a bag of Cool Ranch Doritos and a can of Pepsi Max. They should have made the costume yellow. The Amazing Banana-Man. Instead of webbing he could use his trusty Banana Hammock to catch the baddies. That would've been cool. This movie will make a fucking mint. And that's really all that matters.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:43 p.m. CST

    WOW!

    by Dead_Geek

    Just keep it in about 90% darkness and it looks good.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:47 p.m. CST

    Organic webshooters were like a cheat code for infinite ammo!

    by jazzylg

    He could web somebody to death, and never run out. Look, he even stopped a runaway train in Spider-man 2! Mechanical webshooters would have been ripped apart, or emptied a lot sooner. The costume looks cool, for the 1st time, in this pic.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:50 p.m. CST

    Organic webshooters are like...

    by jazzylg

    Superman with no kryptonite, magic, doomsday, or Darkseid, to give you grief! What kind of movie would that be. Horrible!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 7:56 p.m. CST

    The problem with the webshooters ...

    by The StarWolf

    Is that, Parker's intelligent, competent enough to build such remarkable devices in his bedroom, yet he's perpetually broke? Never made much sense. This is why I didn't mind their going the organic web shooters route in the Raimi films. made more sense. And, yes, the new costume looks terrible compared to the one in the Raimi films.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:01 p.m. CST

    Spidey-suit-boots-reboot

    by Gun Man

    Okay, Many fails here. One dark, overly photoshopped photo and now "the movie looks great?" Keep the hate, folks. Certain facts: 1) I lightened the shot in CS5 and yes, the silly silver slippers are there. 2) he webs look like ass. As pointed out, the way little kids with no patience draw Spidey's webs. And most important -- a reboot was completely UNNECESSARY! They could have just made a fourth spiderman movie with this cast and suit, if they wanted. The ORIGINAL idea behind a reboot was to relaunch a good idea that had become unworkable (the last three BATMAN movies) or financially unsuccessful -- ie., Hulk and Jane Punisher, which each made bupkis (Jane - $54mill WORLDWIDE and Hulk $132 mill Domestic and 113 mill foreign) compared to studio expectations. Now let us take Raimi's Spider-men: 1 - $821,708,551 Worldwide 2 - $738,766,341 WW and even the "bad one" (some of it was) made the most of all 3 - $890,871,626 These are three of the most successful movies in our genre of all time! (ranked #2,3 and 4 in US gross for "comic book movies" ) hell-fucking-o? This reboot is about some shit other than making a new audience for Spidey -- with all the fucking stories ever told in thousands of comics, we keep getting super vs. Lex (trying a land grab) Spidey's origin, Batman's origin -- We shouldn't be complaining about a crappy suit. We should be BEGGING for better stories. Don't you get that they somehow think this is what we squids WANT? And you know those two crappy FANTASTIC FOUR movies? They're rebooting that franchise and those two movies made $700,000,000 worldwide. At least THIS time we might get to see their origin -- wow -- and hopefully DR. Doom's origin too!

  • But where are the Spidey webbed armpits??

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:02 p.m. CST

    Nice

    by MrBisley

    I'm looking forward to this. Awesome pic.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:08 p.m. CST

    its hiding EVERYTHING thats a problem!

    by Jonathhan Kana

    the shitty shoes, the dark dick area, shit, even the eyes are basically slits in this picture. it shows that they KNOW there is a problem with the suit and this color corrected picture is supposed to quell any fears....except all it does is validate them. its a bad magic trick. and LOL@ AICN running with it. fucking harry.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:16 p.m. CST

    I wanted CG-eyes

    by Diagnostic

    Make them moving. He could squint and emote.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:19 p.m. CST

    @johnathankana, don't forget...

    by cloneomat

    ...the stupid half-belt and the red "track suit" stripe down the leg are also hidden. I feel like they mandated the track suit stripe, then realized with the belt it looked like garters. So instead of ditching the stripes, they got rid of the front of the belt. Real cart-before-the-horse thinking there.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:20 p.m. CST

    @diagnostic...troll detection working perfectly.

    by cloneomat

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:21 p.m. CST

    Spider Man New Pic

    by Juan Cabrer

    I like it since it is not the same as the Sam Raimi Spider Man movies. The web shooters remind of the Spiderman TV Show during the 70´s. I look forward to the trailer.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:21 p.m. CST

    Can't call him "Web-Head" anymore

    by Jaster

    Checkerboard-Head? Tic-Tac-Toe-Head? Grid-Head? Graph-Head? Basketball-Head?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:23 p.m. CST

    Sick of Super Hero movies

    by spire_walk

    They're like the Romantic Comedy of guy flicks. You know, it's the same fucking formula, and the protagonist is never in any real danger through the whole movie, and it's always PG (Unless you're Watchmen, which I loved). Safe fluff that treats us like children.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:30 p.m. CST

    How long till change in comic you ask?

    by MichaelH

    Just done last week. New costume. Not the same changes, but different none-the-less.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:31 p.m. CST

    Web shooters on his feet

    by MichaelH

    You heard it here first. Dumb idea though. Hope I'm wrong.

  • everything fit in the subject...

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:39 p.m. CST

    How?

    by Stuart Halliday

    Ok, I'll ask the obvious question. How does Spiderman cling onto surfaces with his hands and feet when his skin is covered with his costume?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:41 p.m. CST

    AICN late w/ the Dark Tower news . . .

    by Nice Marmot

    . . . Michael Biehn is ROLAND!!!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:50 p.m. CST

    @scratchmonkey, actually...you're completely wrong

    by Jaster

    Insects don't climb walls with miniature hook-like hairs. That was completely made-up and put in the first Spider-Man film for idiots like you. Spiders actually use van der Waals forces to adhere to surfaces. This is the electrical attraction between molecules. It is generated in spiders by microscopic hair-like structures called setules which interact with the molecules of whatever they are crawling on. This bond is so powerful that it is unaffected by water or even grease.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:53 p.m. CST

    The costume is still shit

    by Movietool

    Why change it? What's the reason? And even more - why change it so it looks stupid, instead of cool?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:53 p.m. CST

    Origin tales is why I'm hoping Superman: The Man Of Steel

    by TheJudger

    begins with an "Adult" Superman leaving Krypton to find Zod. Zod killed his Parents, stole a ship and fled to earth. Superman pleads with the council for the right to pursue Zod. He is denied, so he takes matters into his own hands. He steals and ship and leaves for earth. Got a few more suggestions. Superman actually changes his visual appearance this time. The glasses bit always bothered me. The suit he wears was intended to explore earth. Think "The Day The Earth Stood Still" Kryptonians were planning to explore the earth to learn more about it's people since we and them originate from the same genetic seeds. They have been studying our radio waves for a while. We are primitive to them but they herald all things science- they wanted to learn about us without revealing themselves. The suit allows the wearer to look like anyone they meet at will. Imagine if someone else got the suit- Nug, Nug, wink, wink. Also Superman can look like members of the thugs he's after. Lots of options here. So what makes him decide to become some geeky guy named Clark Kent. Kal-El fails to save Clark's life. A plane crash or the arctic wild, something big. I'm more for an Arctic something, because that's were Superman crash lands his ship and makes the fortress of solitude from a site specific terraforming crystal. Kal-El decides to be Clark. When he visits the Kent homestead. Martha Kent isn't fooled for long. Kal-El explains what happened. So yeah Superman goes to earth to stop Zod, his ship crashes in the arctic. His ship cant bring him back home. The Ship that brought Zod earth still works... Kal-El uses Zods ship to go back home only to find his planet blown to bits. Who did this why did they do this. Thus begins Superman 2. An Empire Strikes Back if you will.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:55 p.m. CST

    And here's to all you folks who think I'll be there opening night

    by Movietool

    No, I won't. Just like I have yet to see Spider-Man 3, I have zero interest in this shit.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 8:56 p.m. CST

    excuse the typos

    by TheJudger

    Hard to talk on the phone and type.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:04 p.m. CST

    yellow eyes?

    by shogunshin

    why would they use yellow eyes? have the costume designers ever heard of color theory? the main appeal of spiderman is the costume, and spiderman never had yellow eyes in the comics.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:13 p.m. CST

    It Screams...

    by Aaron

    Too much. Spidey wears tights. That's really easy to grasp for me. Any asshole really could make the Spider-Man outfit and make it look half-decent. Where's all that neoprene / whatever-type bullshit coming from? Has anybody making these movies ever looked at a page from MARVELS? Fuck my life.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:15 p.m. CST

    thejudger

    by Aaron

    That's a terrible idea for Superman.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:17 p.m. CST

    This looks...

    by MainMan2001

    fucking rad. I love it. Much better then the last suit. The colors look more saturated.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:18 p.m. CST

    movietool

    by MainMan2001

    you have zero interest in it to the point that you'll write about having zero interest in a blog. Doesn't that mean you have some interest?!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:19 p.m. CST

    I don't mind.

    by MainMan2001

    I mean different writers and artist take over comic books all the time and it's completely excepted. Why can't it be the same for a movie? I'd love to see another take on Batman after Nolan's series.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:23 p.m. CST

    BLUE FINGERS =

    by PRESIDENT BALTAR

    NIPPLES ON BATSUIT

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:23 p.m. CST

    BLUE FINGERS =

    by PRESIDENT BALTAR

    FLAMES ON OPTIMUS

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:27 p.m. CST

    YELLOW EYES =

    by PRESIDENT BALTAR

    THE GREEN GOBLIN

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:29 p.m. CST

    SILVER TOES=

    by blackflowerX

    This looks like shit (lets hope I'm wrong...).

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:29 p.m. CST

    "OH THOSE EYES..."

    by Aaron

    "Those horrible, yellow eyes!" Or my personal favorite... "Deliver us from--" "FINISH IT!" "EEEEEEEEVVVVVVVIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLL!" Gadzooks.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:31 p.m. CST

    Running out of web fluid gimmick was used lots in the comics

    by Cosmik

    The question I always had with the biological webs was wouldn't expelling that much bodily fluid be draining physically. You'd think it would make him constantly tired or hungry.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:33 p.m. CST

    the script still sucks

    by mrgray

    All the neat little touches in the world won't make up for the weakness of the script. It's awfulsauce on a shit sandwich.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:37 p.m. CST

    mrgray

    by PRESIDENT BALTAR

    where can we see the script?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 9:49 p.m. CST

    it looks like Spider-Man to me

    by Datascream

    Dunno what everyone is bitching about

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 10:09 p.m. CST

    trying to keep an open mind about the web shooters

    by mytransgressions

    i'm in the camp that raimi got it right you want Peter Parker to be identifiable as a geeky kid from high school. but not some super genius freak. Maybe somebody helps him make the web shooters .. like Reed Richards. Reed Richards would presumably have the knowledge and vast resources to build something so complex and ingenious.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 10:12 p.m. CST

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    by fastcars

    what? Spider-Man? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 10:12 p.m. CST

    "Netting" vs "webbing"

    by slone13

    Why the fuck would he have "netting" on his mask??? It looks like a grid. Why aren't the any of the lines curved? You know, like a WEB?????

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 10:12 p.m. CST

    I can't wait for the part...

    by fastcars

    ...where a spider bites him, and he gets super spider powers! Won't that be something?!!!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 10:14 p.m. CST

    @mrgray ...have u read the script?

    by cloneomat

    Cuz I wanna too! Send link!

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 10:18 p.m. CST

    by dukeroberts

    Love the webshooters, hate the costume.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 10:46 p.m. CST

    I just don't care

    by kungfuhustler84

    Title, costume, that's all just cosmetic shit. Nothing I've seen or heard about this movie, with a few casting exceptions, gets me excited at all.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 11:02 p.m. CST

    Talkbacks like this make me realize...

    by spire_walk

    ...how there is this whole other side of geekdom that loves comic book movies no matter how safe and PG the movie is, where this whole fucking relaunch stinks. We're getting flooded with comic movies and all of them fall short. Think back to Empire Strikes Back, Aliens, Terminator, Predator, Matrix... Remember how those movies knocked it out of the park? Hell think back to the great stories in the comics. Now, why are all comic book movies so bland? Iron Man was witty, and Dark knight was certainly the exception.... But why are the rest consistently falling short? And why does this reboot excite anyone? Why does his costume even matter? How about the director, the writer, etc? Are they worth a fuck?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 11:11 p.m. CST

    You had me at mechanical web shooters...

    by symon

    ...You had me at mechanical web shooters. (cue Springsteen)

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 11:22 p.m. CST

    spire_walk

    by redkamel

    To all: 1. The costume actually looks pretty good. 2. Why does everyone think he has silver slippers? because the stunt man was wearing it in a spy shot? thats a shitty reason 3. Why all that hate for mechanical shooters? its what he originally had and its a cool story twist. Organic web shooters are a gross concept and anatomically incorrect 4. wow, someone actually said that it was "unbelievable" that a high school kid could make the webbing and shooters as a reason. As if radioactive spider blood, flying Goblin sleds and any spidey villain are more believable. I would say that mechanical web shooters are the MOST believable part besides "he built his own costume". Its a fictional story. Spire_walk: Well, those examples aren't comic book movies anyways..so I would point to District 9, Avatar (even with the hate), Toy Story 3, and Inception. And movies now a says suck because those great movies, and blockbusters, have been reduced to a formula. Add to that some business types running the show, some easy hits (easy money) and you have no incentive to hire/believe in/promote people who love the material and what they do. You just get yes men and douches. You look at the BTS pics and people are getting their hands dirty, building things, having fun, improvising, walking around. Todays BTS? Michael Bay on a walkie talkie in a chair. Lucas indoors looking at computers. And so on. Basically, no one in Hollywood cares anymore, and it shows. Its all just derivative insincere crap. I was fucking off today by looking at intros to 80s cartoons. Even those people cared and tried to make it look good. Now they even phone in Saturday morning cartoons more than I thought possible. Or wait...were you asking a rhetorical question?

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 11:52 p.m. CST

    The criticisms have gotten INCREDIBLY desperate and pathetic

    by IndustryKiller!

    So what we have here is two great young actors in the leads who are ideal for their characters, a new director who, while unproven, is at least not any of the terrible action film directors on the scene today, and EXCELLENT supporting cast, and a script that we know very little about but already corrected the Gwen Stacy issue, so we'll have to wait and see on that one. And the best part of it all? No more Raimi films. He screwed the pooch on the franchise, it's settled science, get over it.

  • Feb. 14, 2011, 11:56 p.m. CST

    Like the director, dislike the costume

    by TheNothing

    (500) Days of Summer was great. Hope Marc Webb can do as well with ASM, but I am NOT digging that costume. What's with all the texture? He looks like a giant, blue and red tire tread.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:03 a.m. CST

    The Superhero movie:

    by Gun Man

    You have a choice to make. What f'ing choice? What's with the "choice" in EVERY superhero movie?! Lazy, lazy writing. Sometimes, brother, we don't have a choice. We have to do what we have to do. "with great power comes great responsibility" Not "With great power comes a choice. Fries or Onion rings" Next superhero movie that has a major dialogue scene about "you have to make a choice" I am tracking down the writer and putting 230 grain .45 ACP slugs in their heads.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:13 a.m. CST

    Fuck...

    by Gwynplaine

    ... Sam Raimi. Also I stopped watching 500 days of summer about 10 minutes into it.

  • They remove the characters from the context of the marvel universe and then scratch their heads as key elements of the character begin to fall apart. Fucking Troglodytes. Could someone please explain to some of these people exactly what type of technology exist in the Marvel Universe (at least pre 1992 when i stopped reading them)? I remember alien technology floating around like ether. Men like Reed Richards, Tony Stark, and Victor Von Doom were building shit that Phillip K. Dick wouldn't even deem feasible. Fantastic Super-technology people...and it was every-fucking-where. Peter Parker...if for some odd reason you may have missed it...is THAT kind of smart. Marvel genius smart. That means: Web Fluid...not a big fucking deal. It MIGHT earn Parker an 'interesting' from Reed Richards as he soon get's bored and turns back to working on his intergalactic thing-a-ma-bob, but nothing more. Is it becoming a wee bit clearer now? Movie execs...your fucking stupid. The characters were born in the marvel universe...evolved in the marvel universe...make sense in the marvel universe...do not remove them from the marvel universe because your pissant screenwriter will NOT be able to create an adequate replacement and it opens your character up to nonsense like this: **slurred speech** 'oh no, he can't make web fluid...dats just imposhible!' What?! Some people should be thrown off the world.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:32 a.m. CST

    by ether I am refer to the classical element, also spelled æther

    by Toruk_Makto

    ...not the organic compound known as Diethyl ether. **shifts bifocals further up bridge of nose**

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:34 a.m. CST

    parker could never afford that suit's materials

    by AzzyAzzy

    seriously

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:58 a.m. CST

    THWIP!

    by MaliceHighload

    http://www.ghostofthefuture.com/images/Ani2/spiderman-amazing.gif

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:58 a.m. CST

    Quint do you think that is really Garfield in the suit???

    by Rupee88

    Highly doubtful...don't believe everything they tell you or ask you to print...how about some journalistic integrity and using your brain??

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:59 a.m. CST

    Fuck this Costume

    by Eli_Cash

    Notice that they carefully concealed the gay parts. Hid the silver slippers and the black crotch and the lack of the belt. Still gonna theatre boycott this movie. Might watch it on DVD, but this costume is such crap that I have no interest in paying more to see it on the big screen, or in 3d.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1 a.m. CST

    toruk_makto

    by Rupee88

    You are the one who is stupid, not the movie executives. This movie will make hundreds of millions of dolars in profits and they will be fush with coke and whores as usual...you just don't get it...basic stuff, dude. wake the fuck up.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:09 a.m. CST

    Toruk

    by Gun Man

    You're right! So I guess we should just put our feet in the air and drop the money to see it in the theater? Seriously, when they forget WHY people liked the character in the first place, what do we do when a gazillion 12 year olds who don't care are going to see it anyway? What? I also love the concept that someone must be hired to write these movies when armies of writers have labored fro over fifty years putting all these characters through every conceivable story. "superman has to fight a giant spider."

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:22 a.m. CST

    Why do I detect some hate for Raimi?

    by SinisterMarmalade

    Seriously, a Spider-man reboot seems premature. Maybe after another decade passes. In any case, Sam Raimi did a good job giving us a hard luck, funny and everyman superhero. And Toby McGuire played the role well. What I don't want to see is someone reboot Spider-man thinking it should be a Leonides rip-off role. Peter Parker was awkward, it was a defining trait. Please, if the new director must remember one thing, it is simply this: Peter Parker had to struggle with his superhero persona, it didn't just make him an ass-kicker out of the box.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:36 a.m. CST

    Come on now

    by CT1

    more facefucking

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:39 a.m. CST

    Ah, coke and whores rupee88!

    by Toruk_Makto

    Well, why didn't you say so buddy! Who gives a shit about 'context' when a chicks snorting coke off your cock! Batter up...

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:47 a.m. CST

    Hmmmm...

    by James Taylor

    I'm not feeling the costume at all. Honestly, Spidey wouldn't need a reboot in the first place if the studio let Raimi make the film he wanted to make rather than force Venom into SM3 which made it a convoluted mess. Anyway, I just hope I'm wrong about this movie sucking. Same for X-Men First Class.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:48 a.m. CST

    I'm getting extremely excited about this,

    by SithMenace

    being a Spider-Man fanboy and all. I loved SM 1 and 2, but this movie is looking better and better every day. How about when things start getting complicated in the 2nd film, they call it Web Of Spider-Man? Sounds good to me.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 2:08 a.m. CST

    Lead and they will follow gun man...

    by Toruk_Makto

    Your average movie goer couldn't even tell you what a director does, much less name any...a sad fact I myself have documented for the last twenty years... And you can better believe they know and could give fuck-all about the fine details we geekoids rage about in these forums...so why not just keep it accurate? Short answer...bullshit movie politics and an overall superior attitude in regard to the source material. I've said it before, movies make more money so they are considered the 'superior medium' and screenwriters by extension the 'superior intellect'. This of course is wrong beyond all possible measure. It's not going to change unless one of two things happen: 1) They notice a substantial loss of money in projects that the geeks deem woefully unfaithful. 2) Someone with clout and a huge set of balls decides that there is a viable market for 'pure' live action comic book adventures. Which entails 5'3" yellow spandex baby! I'll be blunt, I don't think that market is the 'big screen' I think that place (at least for starters) is a subscription network that releases occasional features (much live a comic book annual or a particular story arc) I'd pay $10,$15, $20 bucks a month for these kinds of stories...I'm pretty sure others would too.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 2:20 a.m. CST

    Ol' Turnup head.

    by UltraTron

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 2:35 a.m. CST

    Fuck Yeah!!!

    by grievenom

    Looks bitchen. Can't wait for this film to come out!

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 2:41 a.m. CST

    Web shooters shown but shoes are hidden in the shadows

    by centilope

    They went overboard with trying to make this version of Spidey Nolan-like. Orange lenses, silver crap on his feet that makes him stick to walls or jump higher and further or whatever it's supposed to be for, fact is the "shoes" look like crap. Spider-Man is not Batman you dumb fucks.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 3:07 a.m. CST

    It aint what ya wear, its the way the you film it..maybe

    by quantize

    well, from the contrast between this 'official' photo and the set ones clearly there's a disconnect here.. Either he's gonna look like a twit in a camp shiney suit or really cool I doubt there'll be a middle ground

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 3:09 a.m. CST

    braindrain

    by SithMenace

    So you think SM3 was as good as the first 2? Gross does not equal quality, and I forget who said it, but a sequel performs according to the quality of the previous film. Do some research, it's true.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 3:28 a.m. CST

    Like a Grubby Basketball...

    by T0KY0SEXWHALE

    too many textures and nonsensical lines.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 3:32 a.m. CST

    Looks like ...

    by Fortunesfool

    A guy from the 80's deciding which watch to wear :)

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 3:48 a.m. CST

    Hope the suit evolves.

    by Carl XVI Gustaf

    Add a utility belt to this and we're getting there. If upgrading the suit (towards classic) is the intent, I'd say good start. One reboot I'm looking forward to.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 3:59 a.m. CST

    Webbed armpits!

    by Carl XVI Gustaf

    Someone mentioned that above. That is one thing they missed out on to be different from the previous movies (something they seem quite desperate to be).

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 4 a.m. CST

    I don't get it...

    by bcom77

    Organic web shooters or not, you have to admit that Sam Raimi's suit was arguably one of the most faithful page to screen adaptions of a super hero costume other than Chris Reeves Superman suit. I know that with a re-boot you need to distinguish yourself from what came before to seem fresh but it just seems, in my opinion anyway, this suit just doesn't feel right. Spidey's suit, more than most other superheroes, is just too iconic to mess with too much. It's clean and uncomplicated but the new suit is all... sectioned and paneled looking. Perhaps all will be put to rest once we get a proper trailer (which surely must be coming soon) but in the words of the great Garth Algar from the Waynes World movie: "It looks like Wayne's basement, only it's not Wayne's basement, isn't that weird?".

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 4:08 a.m. CST

    Costume aversions ...

    by Number_Six

    Seems there's a lot of costume aversion going on at the moment - Superman should lose the trunks, where's Batman's skin tight outfit, what's going on with Spidey? I guess Superman and Batman can get away with incredible costumes as Kal El likely brought his with him from Krypton, and Bruce Wayne is a billionaire who could easily fund the construction of an incredible suit. Spider-man, as everyone says, is just a poor struggling student, no funds, no access to Edna Mode, and whilst he's potentially a genius there's nothing to suggest he's either handy with a needle and thread or has access to cutting edge materials. It's tricky though, as a home made looking suit won't fit the same, and the actor needs a stellar physique to pull it off ... I doubt some Spandex and stitching would translate well to the big screen ... but they could strike a balance, which they didn't do with Raimi's Spider-man (raised detailing, gimme a break), and they certainly haven't done so with the new movie - it's all Optimus Prime, but it's really not working. I guess if the movie's half decent then we'll be able to look past it, but I'm reckoning the movie will be shite. Mechanical web shooters ... I like 'em, I mean I think it makes more sense if they're biological as that would complete the circle of spider powers Parker inherited (climbing walls, agility & strength, 6th sense, web production - although technically he should shoot webs out of his hoop in that case - which might not be a great look), and I like the notion someone suggested where the web is biological but the mechanical part helps control it (line, net, concussion ball, etc.) ... but the shooters in the comics were mechanical, and so you have to respect them giving credence to that. I do like the idea that he could run out and have to rely on his other abilities to outsmart a foe.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 4:13 a.m. CST

    Nitpicking

    by rob33

    Unbelievable - we've not seen one second of footage, yet people are bitching! He looks lke Spiderman, in the comics he was an outcast, an insecure science nerd, intelligent enough to manufacture webshooters, why do you people have a problem with that? It's not realistic enough - we want a more realistic Spiderman, yeah, well then maybe he should shoot his web out of his ass you know - just like a real spider... I can't wait to see that, Andrew Garfields flabby ass shooting webs across the screen, then he sit in the corner of his bedroom, motionless, for hours and hours and hours waiting to catch a fly... Aunt May walks into his room, brushes against the web and Spiderman spurts forward as fast as his 8 arms and legs can carry him wrap her in a cocoon Great, bring on the realism

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 4:51 a.m. CST

    it was not against Kraven

    by sHapesHiftinLizard

    The dislocated shoulder scene was from his first encounter with Puma, and he didn't run out of webbing, he just did that instinctively with his arm.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:01 a.m. CST

    Webb's Black Bulging Spider-Pissflap versus Schumacher's Bat Nipples

    by eveelcapitalist

    Which is worse? I swear to God this movie will be to Spider-Man what Batman Forever was to Batman. Marc Webb is the new Joel Schumacher. Rise, my fellow Talkbackers! Rise, rise like the people of Tunisia! Rise like the people of Egypt! We must gather our forces to denounce Marc Webb as we denounced Joel Schumacher for his vile treachery!

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:12 a.m. CST

    Wow, so much hating!

    by Paul

    I never normally bother posting on these things, but Spidey is a character I've grown up with. Have to say have some reservations about the costume, but I'm more concerned about the suggested Twilight vibe of the story. HOWEVER I really don't think it's fair to judge this until it's wrapped, finished in post and in the theatre. If it sucks, so be it! Regardless, this is not the last time Sony will milk this cash cow, there'll be other spideys further on down the line...

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:13 a.m. CST

    Why does the costume look so dirty?

    by eveelcapitalist

    This is one thing that's bothered me about the costume but I figured it had to do with the fact that all the photos up until now have been production stills. But it's not really, is it. The costume just looks dirty, like it needs a washing. Maybe it's the lighting and the textures but ti really looks like it should be dry cleaned or something. Spider-Man really looks like he could use a bath. This is, like, Hobo Spider-Man. Spider-Man, fighting for truth, justice and a sandwhich. Just...wow. No. I'm sorry. I've been looking forward to seeing an official photo like this in full action mode and still I find nothing redeeming about it. It's still bad. When they issued the first Spider-Man photo for Raimi's film, it was perfect. Spider-Man perched on a rooftop ready to swing into action. It looked great. It was well look, the costume was fresh and the whole thing really got you excited. This...I don't care. It doesn't look good in stills and I doubt it will look good on screen. It's half-assed. It looks half-assed and everything that comes out related to the movie is half-assed. Half-assed costume, half-assed director, half-assed budget, and when it starts leaking I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that the script will be half-assed as well. There's nothing amazing or spectacular or sensational about this Spider-Man, no sirree!

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:21 a.m. CST

    mainman2001

    by Movietool

    Point taken.

  • Yes it did. The hairs are minute, small enough to poke through the porous fabric of his costume - just like in the Raimi movies. There's even a scene in the first (?) movie, where you see the tiny little hook-like hairs on the surface of Peter's fingertips.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 6:41 a.m. CST

    I should point out...

    by buggerbugger

    ...that I wasn't "nitpicking" bames_jond's choice of words, I was hoping to be informative.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 6:43 a.m. CST

    I LOVE SPIDEY

    by ZOMBRE

    ...and im allowed to be upset when his costume looks like a design nightmare.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 7:15 a.m. CST

    Cut,Print...GAY.

    by frank

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 7:28 a.m. CST

    way better then the set pics

    by Wookie_1995

    but I see what people are saying about it looking dirty....maybe dirt from a brawl?

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 8:02 a.m. CST

    braindrain

    by spire_walk

    Okay, find ANYWHERE on the net where I thought that mechanical shooters were good and Raimi was bad, or vice versa. What I hate is that 5 minutes after Spiderman 3 left theaters, they're rebooting the whole franchise and gearing it for a younger audience with a younger, hipper cast. I just really find it odd that AICN Talkbackers, some of the most jaded, cynical film buffs in the world, are excited about this, and all anyone cares about are fucking nuances on his suit. You're rearranging deck chairs on the fucking Titanic. BTW, Predator grossed $98 Million out of an $18 Million dollar budget. What Marvel universe are you from where that's considered a flop? But you're right, I haven't seen Amazing Spiderman yet, but I know exactly what it'll be: a mediocre PG-rated toy commercial. Sorry, I just don't see what that has to offer adult movie goers.

  • .....cant produce webs through his own body like, you know, a spider can. But you know, what ever.......

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 8:11 a.m. CST

    viggeo

    by spire_walk

    The names don't ring a bell. Are those characters who will be in this reboot or the next one?

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 8:25 a.m. CST

    Still not sold on this

    by rogueleader66

    I'm not hating the Spidey suit, but i'm still not keen on the whole teen angst/peter in high school stuff that they somehow feel the need to return to. Show me a trailer, one that convinces me that this reboot was not a huge mistake.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 8:27 a.m. CST

    TINY continued.

    by v3d

    Seriously. How much fluid could they possibly hold? 10 cc's? Anyone who's ever fired a Super Soaker knows how fast they run out of water and they generally shoot only 30-40 feet. Spider-Man shoots web streams up to HUNDREDS of feet. Are they magic web shooters? Is he wearing a huge Scuba sized tank on his back that holds the fluid? Is that tank invisible? This only proves Raimi had it right.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 8:27 a.m. CST

    father

    by rogueleader66

    I agree, I never had a problem with Raimi's take on that, it's what a spider does for fuck's sake, so why were people crying about it? Because Peter is a genius and they wanted to see the web shooters? Who fucking cares. Fanboys will bitch about anything....take your tampons out and STFU.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 8:34 a.m. CST

    ok somebody mentioned topher grace as pete

    by thesmilingpsycho

    while i don't think that's a BAD choice, i don't think he would be perfect casting either. no tobey wasn't perfect casting, but i think garfield actually is. (tobey was good for pete, but not a good spidey, altho i think i'd chalked that up to issues with the script) after seeing garfield in the social network, he's nuanced enough to be peter and he has the comedic timing also to play spider-man. plus he's just a good actor. and he was also able to pull off the tough guy thing at one point in the movie despite playing a nerd through most of the film. but topher just doesn't seem to have the heart to play pete. he's a better eddie brock. he's too dry. i just don't think i'd believe him if he were to get all emotional on screen. i think as a whole this movie has better casting and people will be surprised by how good it is. i know people want to complain about the suit but it definitely looks at least more practical than the last one. like maybe a bike suit or somethin? anyway i'm not necessarily a fan of the look, it will be a small issue tho if the movie is good especially since the costume might gradually change to look more like the classic version, however the change in costume is a bold choice and shows some confidence in the filmmaker.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 8:45 a.m. CST

    v3d

    by thesmilingpsycho

    the web shooter cartridges could be around his wrist underneath the costume. in fact i'm willing to bet they are. he probly has spare ones somewhere too.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 9:39 a.m. CST

    also somebody said somethin about the web shooters

    by thesmilingpsycho

    i understand why raimi took them out to make pete more identifiable right? psh that didn't really work considering they still made him a super genius regardless of that fact. plus these web shooters could be something curt connors helps him with which would further develop their relationship.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 9:51 a.m. CST

    damn_dirty_ape

    by thesmilingpsycho

    dude are u serious? wes bentley? the only thing i get from him is damaged creep. definitely not ur average happy go lucky nerdy guy. no way would he ever be peter parker. good point about the web shooters. i guess u could just fault that on his dedicated heroism. he would rather fight crime using his web shooters then sell them to make money.. or maybe they will have him try to do that at one point? maybe even debate over it? who knows?

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 10:03 a.m. CST

    Boycott

    by LGM

    If Swiss Miss is not in this movie, I will refuse to see IT! That being said, this costume is the equivalent of Swiss Miss. With the silver booties, ugly gloves and the Amazing Spider Crotch.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 10:16 a.m. CST

    Epic FAIL!!!

    by codecrackx15

    ...On all levels. Starting with this shitty suit!!!

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 10:17 a.m. CST

    SPIDER-PIG, SPIDER-PIG!!! DOES WHATEVER A SPIDER-PIG DOES!!!

    by THE_CHOPPAH

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 10:19 a.m. CST

    Sorry, I'm not a hater, but that costume is shit

    by Laserhead

    Really. In three years it's going to look like the most retarded super-hero decision since Schumacher's Batman.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 11:38 a.m. CST

    I'm usually behind these costume changes

    by David Cloverfield

    But this costume seems like it was randomly picked from a table full of concept drawings, because everybody was tired and wanted to go home to their kids.

  • Does reboot mean another "origins" movie? So I gotta sit thru the spider bite, the self-discovery, the uncle death... everything again??

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:46 p.m. CST

    just like the comics

    by wrx

    I think it's a good thing when different creators can tell their story. To tell the truth, I'm just glad these projects are being attempted. im old enough to remember when all we had was basically Donner's Superman. What if all these movies tank and hollywood is too scared to try anymore. Comic book projects could go the way of the western. I like Spider-Man enough to give any decent attempt a look. I'll be there opening night, and if i'm disappointed, so be it. I grew up reading Marvel and D.C. and i'm loving every minute of this.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 12:56 p.m. CST

    Your right rk_maroon...your in for a rehash...

    by Toruk_Makto

    In the end costumes, casting--even the villains, are superficial bullshit used to distract the customer from the fact they're being sold the same old bullshit. It's just packaging...shiny and new...while the core is old and fetid. Which is why I don't give them my money. They're going to have to make it past the preliminaries if this genre of movies ever wants to see my dime.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:13 p.m. CST

    alright lets do this right and

    by Wookie_1995

    have the opening titles of the movie be about how his uncle died and he got bite and made the web shooters...come one everyone knows his orgin by heart!

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:18 p.m. CST

    MAXIMUM CLONAGE!

    by TheMark

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. The DTV sequel, Web of Scarlet Spider.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:44 p.m. CST

    The suit looks alright now.

    by AsimovLives

    See? Too easy to criticise when we saw the first suit pictures. Those were set spy photos, which are always crap looking. This the the suit with the proper photographic colour correction. It's fine by me.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 1:46 p.m. CST

    looks like

    by NIGHTWINGKEN

    shit

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 2:30 p.m. CST

    viggeo_morgenstein,

    by BilboRing

    It's Amazing, Spectacular, and then Webb of Spider-Man, you fuck. Fucking fucker!

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 3:28 p.m. CST

    What About A Jessica Drew Spider-Woman Movie?

    by Merlin_Ambrosius

    Surely the High Evolutionary's daughter deserves a turn!

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 4:10 p.m. CST

    please stop saying topher grace is the perfect parker

    by thesmilingpsycho

    he's not

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 4:25 p.m. CST

    dragon_lee76...best one liner in a long time.

    by Cletus Van Damme

    I am LOLing, thank you, sir.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:08 p.m. CST

    why do people keep saying it looks like 2099?

    by killianx

    it looks nothing like it!

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:14 p.m. CST

    since Bernard Manning tried to fart and shat our your Mum, yes

    by Smack_Teddy

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:15 p.m. CST

    Not a bad pic

    by Smack_Teddy

    but it would be nice to see one in daylight

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:18 p.m. CST

    I can't front...that pic looks great!

    by Wcwlkr

    I one that has loathed the very existence of this movie. All I pictured was train wreck and garbage. Why reboot something that's not that old, and where 2 out of 3 were FANTASTIC, and the last was half great other half weak. But I can't deny I love the title that's what Spiderman 2 should've been called. So Amazing Spiderman GREAT!! I love the mechanical web shooters because yes it gives you a way cooler dynamic to work with. And I do love the look of that pic. I'm still skeptical but I'll probably end up checking this out if, shots like this keep popping up.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:21 p.m. CST

    Only similarity this costume has with 2099

    by Wcwlkr

    The only similarity is the gloves. It's the exact same gloved look from the 2099 Spiderman. That's where the similarities end. The suit itself definitely looks darker more muted.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:26 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man 2099

    by MrBisley

    That costume was supposed to be black and red.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:31 p.m. CST

    I want to be upset about this but..

    by Dr.DeadPaul

    for some reason i am not. Granted the costume is crazy elaborate but with proper scripting it could be explained. For example he could be a cosplay enthusiast. As a person who has gone to conventions I can attest that fanboys can make some crazy awesome costumes. I am really curious about how Andrew Garfield will portray him. I was kind of disappointed with Tobey's version. This is not because Tobey is a bad actor but rather i grew up with Dematteis and Michelinie doing Spider-man. He was a little wittier then and seemed a little more mature.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 5:59 p.m. CST

    Looks a lot like the Spider-Girl costume.

    by Triple_J_72

    Take that comment however you like ;-P

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 7:02 p.m. CST

    Here's the costume in the comic books, goofs....

    by Mindworm22

    http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/joshw24/news/?a=28581 It was done in a David Lapham / Tony Harris origin story that came out a few years ago. I didn't like it then. Don't like it now. But it WAS actually in the comics, folks.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 7:19 p.m. CST

    Who are you freaks pissing on the mechanical webshooters?

    by GimpInMyPants

    Have you guys ever read a Spider-Man comic book? Webshooters have been a part of Spidey's history from the beginning. Who's actually shitting on them? We should admire Sony for actually staying true to the character. Raimi's Spidey trilogy was......okay at best. Spidey 2 had some kickass fight scenes but the writing sucked and because of that the acting sucked. Spider-Man is supposed to be a wisecracking smartass. Also, the black suit on Spidey 3 sucked. It wasn't solid black, it was essentially the Spidey costume painted black. The mechanical webshooters are essential to get the character right. Sony does a lot of shit but this decision was the right one.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 8:26 p.m. CST

    This Is Gonna Suck

    by THX1968

    Seriously. I haven't complained enough about the machinations behind the demise of Raimi's Spidey 4, but Hathaway's casting in Batman Rises (whatever) only cements what I already know. I'm not getting into that, because I already have. This Spidey is not the Spidey of the Ditko, Romita, Andru (my personal favorite) days. This is something "new". This is something that is going to suck my dong.

  • Feb. 15, 2011, 10:35 p.m. CST

    "gives spiderman a weakness"

    by Warcraft

    are you fucking kidding me? spiderman isn't invincible. he already has weaknesses. He can still fucking be shot, stabbed, beat to death, blown up, acid in the face, run over by a tank, run through with a sword, eat some fucking poison, catch aids, die of cancer, etc etc. Having mechanical webshooters isn't going to add a shred of tension. Ok so falling to his doom is now a viable way for him to die incase his webshooters run out. Ok but that's like saying, well if you take away superman's flight, he can now fall to his doom which will add tension. Oh fuck wait no it won't because he's fucking invincible. People complaining about the organic webshooters need to stop acting like he was unstoppable with them. There's plenty of ways he can die where his organic web shooters wouldn't count for shit.

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:05 a.m. CST

    costume

    by MrMajestic

    Actually this suit reminds me a bit of that Dan Jurgens Spidey suit. Not bad but just meh. In addition I was one of the first to bitch about the organic web shooter, but I've been proven wrong. They kinda make sense power-wise and make Parker less of a douche about not selling his invention to 3M to get his Aunt out of a bad situation. If my mom or mom-figure was about to lose her home I'd do next to anything to help her out.

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:25 a.m. CST

    Ha Ha Ha Ha.....Fucking Smartphones!!!

    by darthSaul666

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:26 a.m. CST

    This film is Queen of the Spider Damned!!!!

    by darthSaul666

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:28 a.m. CST

    My Spidey sense tells me

    by darthSaul666

    This reboot will have more in common with Punisher War Zone than Batman Begins/Dark Knight

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:31 a.m. CST

    Trilogy Titles...

    by sXeblues

    I dig the look so far... And the little I've heard of the flick. For the trilogy, I'd dig it if they went: The Amazing Spider-Man The Web of Spider-Man The Spectacular Spider-Man...

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:55 a.m. CST

    I hate this reboot?

    by darthSaul666

    I smell more business than art for this flick. I remember when James Cameron was supposed to make the 1st Spidey Flick..... I started reading his script online like 10 years ago...... And some of you think Mr. Raimi did a bad job? Be thankful you didn't get Mr Cameron's Batman in a Spidey Suit style... Costume changes aside....... Spidey graduated highschool in #15 of Amazing Fantasy........Spidey in Highschool is Ultimate line.....Yet we get Gwen Stacy as 1st love and highschoolcetric experience....... This movie is Flames on Optimus....Nu Hallie Berry Catwoman.....Nipples on the Batsuit.....Uwe Bol before Tunnel Rats........It's like that flick that flick Queen of the Damned without Vampire Lestat...... Hate to say it but we're getting this flick b/c Sony/Columbia pictures dosen't want to lose they're Star Wars like golden goose........ Don't give me your interesting take on Superman either.... I've been reading alot on modern post Crisis on Infinte Earths lately.....and it would have been fucking sweet if Bryan Singer was when he made Superman Returns!

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:57 a.m. CST

    Drunk rant post

    by darthSaul666

    Gotta love the smartphone

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 4:08 a.m. CST

    Whoops I fogot one

    by darthSaul666

    Flames on Optimus...... And fucking no! I will not be 1st in line to see this flick on openning day either.... Saving my money for Thor, Green Lantern, Captain America, The Dark Knight Rises, The Avengers. Basically the flicks that aren't contractual obligation films like that X men prequel

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 5:02 a.m. CST

    x men first class is totally stupid to me

    by darthSaul666

    There is a prof x and beast.......... but no cyclops, jean grey, ice man, or angel, But it sounds as close to the the source as Spidey being in highschool without being called the ULTIMATE movie!

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 5:12 a.m. CST

    spider queen of the damned!!!

    by darthSaul666

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 7:04 a.m. CST

    I'd like to see a movie about May Parker, aka, Spider-Girl.

    by AsimovLives

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 8:21 a.m. CST

    I just hope this is good.

    by rogueleader66

    The back to high school nonsense does not appeal to me in any way, but I'll still give it a chance. My expectations are low I must say.

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 11:36 a.m. CST

    bha... Before I write "It's goign to be AMAZING!" ..

    by ColloquiallyBorn

    I'm gonna wait until the damn trailer comes out, and even then... The costume looks ok, but them Nike looking shoes and the extreme mods on the original suit just pushes it to where it shouldn't go. Haven't they learned from the Superman return crap weird color costume with the new little dark "S" and the dark purple cape without the yellow symbol on it that you can modify some feature, like the texture of it as we saw in previous Spidey flicks, but to go in and change it so that the original look and feel or design changes it just makes it look bad. I'm pretty sure by looking at this one someone on the design team said "Let's make it more tecky savy by adjusting the web covering to make it look like computer parts, you know more squares than webs!! And have that Matrix cool effect appeal to where the webbing look in front drops to the crotch!" .. A. Garfield, I think can do the job, just as many (I included) thought that Maguire would not make it work, I think that Garfield needs to have his shot. I just hope they don't mess to much with the storyline like they did with the costume, little tweeks sometimes birng on full scale implosions. We were all happy when Singer signed on for Superman, we saw his desire to make it like it should be with the actual build of a farm ect.. We were all a little freaked out by the costume change, but said "Hey! What can go wrong!" But when the movie came out.. We saw that those little tweeks in the costume actually was reflected in the whole movie by changin the essence of the Hero and making him a Voyeur, a Father (WTF with that!?!?); a Superman affected by a single chunk of Kryptonite stuck in his ribs, but unaffected by a whole damn continent of the damn stuff resting on his shoulders because he "energized"!?!?!?! Too many things can go wrong when they proceed to change the essence of the characters and sometime their costume, like Spidey, says a lot about the whole storyline. I hope they don't mess.. sorry.. they don't "Singer" it...

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 12:16 p.m. CST

    @dr_pepperspray

    by ColloquiallyBorn

    I just busted out laughing after reading your last 2 comments, nothing personal, more on the sense that I imagined Peter walking around and thinking his nipples hurt and suddenly spider webs!! A mix between the Spider's webs and the Goat's nipples blasters!! MOUAHAHAAHHAHA!!! But that would be more of a porn version of Spidey I think!! LOL!!

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:48 p.m. CST

    rogueleader66

    by AsimovLives

    I never lower expectations. Thus, i can see a movie for the bullshit it is if it's a bad movie. that's why i can see the bullshit in such movies as that one i mention a lot, if you know what i mean. I always feel that if i lower expectations for a movie, i'm betraying myself. And i don't like that. It's bad enough we do that in our daily life. There's things in our lives we shoud never betray. Me, it's movies.

  • I'm not going to have a Spider-Man movie ruined for me because there's either organic or mechanical web shooters. I'm not that stupid. Thjere's far more important things where a Spider-Man movie can fuck up.

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 3:55 p.m. CST

    dr_pepperspray

    by AsimovLives

    I wish that in the new Spider-Man movies they actually portait Peter Parker as he is, a young scientific genious. I hope the movies really play on the fact he's really very, very intelligent and he's a very scientific minded infividual. But soemhow i doubt, since we are living in this Era Of Dumb, where dumb shit like Jar Jar Abrams's RETARD TREK is popular and the example to follow. I still have no reason to be pessimistic about the movie. I also have no reason to be optimistic either.

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 4:11 p.m. CST

    I agree Ramirez

    by SithMenace

    In fact when I started watching That 70's Show in the 90's, I thought Topher and Laura Prepon would make the perfect Peter and MJ. I still think they would have.

  • Feb. 16, 2011, 6:53 p.m. CST

    Stan Lee is turning in his fleshy grave...

    by chien_sale

    This take is on Ultimate Spider-Man, not the Amazing Spider-Man.

  • Feb. 17, 2011, 8:25 a.m. CST

    web shooter argument

    by thesmilingpsycho

    even if the web shooters were organic, peter could still make money by donating some of his genetically spliced webbing to science. FACT

  • Fuck all of you pathetic losers. I've seen some of you in 2012. You'll know who I am (in 2012). I'm the guy dropping dollar bills in your crusty ass coffee cups, while freezing your filthy nuts off the side of the road.And if you still don't get that, then let me beat you over the head with the obvious hammer... You are fucking bums in the future. So be nice when I drop that uneeded $1 bills. Or I might just kick your fucking head in.