Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

What's Spidey Doing To That Guy's Face!?

 

Merrick here...

New photos of Spidey's costume from Marc Webb's new SPIDERMAN film have gone online over at PopSugar.  I know...at least I hope...that top image will look a helluva lot better when we see it in motion on the big screen, presumably as some kind of flip/fight move.  As is, though...you know? 

Click either pic to jump to more shots. 

 

 

--- follow Merrick on Twitter ! ---

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:32 p.m. CST

    Cod Piece?

    by RainesMaker

    wtf?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:32 p.m. CST

    YOOOOO

    by professor murder

    GABBA GABBA!!!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:32 p.m. CST

    This is going to be GOD AWFUL.

    by Bodacious_Crumb

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:33 p.m. CST

    aint it coming soon news?

    by yourSTEPDADDY

    if all you have to do to have a "successful" movie site is take pics from other sites, than surely I can make a site... naw, Im too lazy

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:34 p.m. CST

    Garfield is a bigger dork then Toby.

    by Mr Soze

    God, was he a nerd in Never let me go. Great movie though.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:34 p.m. CST

    This costume...

    by professor murder

    Are they going to add post effects/texture to his costume? Because by these pics of it, I'm not really liking it. Also, it looks like he has red gloves with blue paint all over his fingers. And again, those boots(or whatever they are) just aren't working.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:36 p.m. CST

    Any word on the silver around his feet???

    by Mr Soze

    Every pic I've seen shows silver around his feet.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:37 p.m. CST

    and why is Spider-Man throwin up gang signs?

    by yourSTEPDADDY

    is he a blood or a crip?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:37 p.m. CST

    Lenses by Ray-Ban?

    by Bodacious_Crumb

    I smell a product placement.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:37 p.m. CST

    looks NS4W.

    by vulturess

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:38 p.m. CST

    They best not fuck us with this "suit"

    by axelfoley

    I could see the actor's eyes in the lens. What's with that non-existent Spider on the back. What is this shit about? Silver metal bootie bottoms? Are they TRYING to fuck this up? It all starts with the suit--im telling you everything else can be PERFECT, but ruin the suit it'll distract from everything else.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:40 p.m. CST

    SPIDEY SENSE TINGLING!!

    by UMAGA

    I'M GONNA BLOW MY WEB ALL OVER YOUR FACE URRHGHGGHGH

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:40 p.m. CST

    Uh.... yeah...

    by WriteForTheEdit

    So... That guy on the, uh, "receiving" end in the first picture seems to be having a good time...

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:40 p.m. CST

    WHY DOES THE GUY LOOK LIKE MICHAEL MYERS?

    by UMAGA

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:40 p.m. CST

    MOST PHOTOGRAPHED SUPERHERO EVER

    by CHRISTIAN_BALE_TRASHED_MY_LIGHTS

    You know when the same person's photo feed pops up over and over again on Facebook and it grows steadily more annoying until you eventually start to think about deleting them? I'm feeling like that now. I'm sick of seeing Spider-Man running places, eating his lunch or thrusting his hips in some guy's face.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:45 p.m. CST

    SERIOUSLY?!

    by goodguy

    The stripes are just bad design. PERIOD. The eyes look like a pair of broken Oakleys glued to the mask. The blue on the gloves... the silver on the shoes... And for shitsake, why are his cockandballs spraypainted black?! This costume is embarrassing.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:46 p.m. CST

    Hahahaaa!

    by Cat_Corporation

    I've got to say, that's bloody hilarious. Cool points - zero!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:47 p.m. CST

    I guess that guy is doing some green "gobblin'..."

    by WriteForTheEdit

    See what I did there?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:47 p.m. CST

    I'm sure...

    by ObiBen

    Corman's Fantastic Four was better than this.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:47 p.m. CST

    An Endless Parade Of Epic Failure

    by NeonFrisbee

    Enjoy your Spidertwink, Twilight dorks.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:49 p.m. CST

    I believe it's called Tea-Baggin'

    by D o o d

    One places their testicles on people or objects that need Tea-Baggin'. Ones scrotum should make contact with the alien surface to ensure correct baggin'

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:49 p.m. CST

    Hot.

    by blackwood

    My interest and pants went up.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:50 p.m. CST

    Looks like crap, he's a skinny emo twilight sissy

    by Eagleone

    This movie looks really bad. Screw the fans and go for the twilight crowd huh? your NOT getting a penny of my $$.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:50 p.m. CST

    Spiderman's codpiece

    by kingralphuk

    Why the black balls Spidey? "Hell, Ima jus' tryna be like 80's pop group Cameo, yo"

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:53 p.m. CST

    This Spiderman costume sucks!

    by Thanos0145

    Why did Webb try to fix something that wasn't broken?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:55 p.m. CST

    saw the musical last night

    by Eddie_Dane

    Actually not bad. I was pleasantly surprised.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 1:55 p.m. CST

    by MikeTheSpike

    Ha ha, those faggots, eh Merrick? God, sure glad *I'm* not gay!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:01 p.m. CST

    this is from his fight with the NobGoblin

    by the new transported man

    yesh

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:02 p.m. CST

    Stuff on his feet are web shooters?

    by MichaelH

    I just get this sinking feeling looking at this costume. The metal on the feet does seem to be part of it, and it looks like a mechanism. Not happy. They're taking Spider-Man where it's never been before, changing many things just for the sake of changing them. Are we ready for a gay Spider-Man? There's a reason for continuity with superheroes. Changes are OK if it goes someplace interesting, but I'm not seeing where this is going.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:03 p.m. CST

    Why is Spiderman f*cking that dude in the face?

    by Centauri

    this is ... different... than I imagined when they first announced the new movie.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:10 p.m. CST

    LOOK LIKES A TRIBUTE TO THE AICN GIF

    by J-Dizzle

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:11 p.m. CST

    Spiderman just gets gayer and gayer...

    by Doctor_Strangepork

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:11 p.m. CST

    I guess I agree with Julie Taymore.

    by cookylamoo

    This looks like the kind of costume a teenager would make.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:12 p.m. CST

    You guys are the faggots...

    by MST3KPIMP

    There have been tons of new pics that aicn has'nt run showing Spidey swinging and crawling and they look sweet. They have chosen the funniest still they could to get a reaction and guess what.. You guys are so redic.. When you see Spidey take down that thug in the final film you'll not only appreciate that it WASNT cgi but also smile when you think back to how bad the thread made it look. Spidey's commin back and it's gonna be great!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:15 p.m. CST

    NOMNOMNOMNOM! Organic webshooters rewritten to be in crotch

    by LargoJr

    Oh yeah.. you like that.. dont ya.. yeeaaahh.. you KNOW you do bitch

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:16 p.m. CST

    I'm trying to make a joke about "organic shooting"...

    by WriteForTheEdit

    ...but nothing's "coming"...

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:16 p.m. CST

    Prove that was a guy!

    by luke_lymon

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:18 p.m. CST

    Looks like a Cher costume

    by dastickboy

    I'm not loving this, I think the studio should leak some footage or run a teaser to generate some goodwill.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:19 p.m. CST

    Not liking the Nike Air Spideys

    by juice willis

    <p>Sometimes the costume looks alright to me, and sometimes I hate the shit out of it.</p> <p>I'd have given him the black (non-symbiote) suit. That way you wouldn't have to explain PP's remarkable sewing skills (ala Raimey's suit). He'd just be a kid who paints a big bad-ass white spider on the front and back of some black tights.</p> <p>That would work perfect with the skinny-jean Peter Parker we look like we're getting.</p>

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:21 p.m. CST

    I have a baaaaad feeling about this movie.

    by BilboRing

    Screw Raimi and Co. for fucking Spidey 3 in the ass!!! Should have ENDED with Brock turning into Venom. Spidey 4 could have been all Venom. Spidey three could have had a better Sandman and Harry Osborn story.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:24 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man: Fucking Your Face In 2011

    by DickBallsworth

    I just cracked myself up.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:24 p.m. CST

    I liked it better when Black Widow did that...

    by MattmanReturns

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:26 p.m. CST

    Braindrain - offensive pics

    by ObiBen

    Look at all the other movie sites. This series of photos look like a burlesque diswashing glove infomercial, no matter how you cut it. Hopefully this will damper the current dumb superhero movie craze.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:27 p.m. CST

    "Smell my ball sweat!"

    by Mr Lucas

    Spidey normally does that legs-around-the-neck thing from behind, but I suppose this version has that biological warfare element.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:28 p.m. CST

    Worst fucking picture imaginable. Spiderman poster tagline:

    by UltraTron

    You will believe a man can fuck another man in the face. Nuff said?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:30 p.m. CST

    Organic Webshooter?

    by Zurge

    Man, that's too easy.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:32 p.m. CST

    Yourstepdaddy: I put the kibosh on such posts earlier

    by UltraTron

    in another post. So this will be the last time I repeat it. This site does not report original news. This site posts stories from other sites so you can comment on them. Duh. Ok so if anyone ever mentions this again the rule is you are immediately banned. So go ahead and mention it again I dare you.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:34 p.m. CST

    that costume is all sorts of wrong.

    by Orion

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:36 p.m. CST

    Oh I get it. The flip-flops are so his feet don't stick

    by UltraTron

    to the ground and he can run faster. He can't turn off his sticky feet. So he just slips off the flip flops whenever he climbs something. His new catchphrase is "just a sec while I slip off my spidy flip-flops!" Then he springs into action.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:36 p.m. CST

    Forget what made Spidey great everyone...

    by ZOMBRE

    Well they got an even better idea! Just wait! How about a black crotch! Blue Fingers! And silver slippers! It's Spiderman! I read comics by the boatload and strange and ugly costume changes for the biggest superhero wont go unnoticed by me or my kind.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:36 p.m. CST

    its a Fuckin Sleestack in 2nd pic!

    by norm

    Spiderman looks gay and faggot

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:38 p.m. CST

    Really now -- why is his crotch region black?

    by Prof. Pop-Cult

    And it's like the red design along the chest is a giant arrow pointing down to his dick. This feels like a worse superhero wardrobe malfunction than the infamous Bat nipples.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:41 p.m. CST

    ultratron...

    by yourSTEPDADDY

    did you copy and paste that response from comingsoon.net? because I swore I saw that same comment there... blah blah blah

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:43 p.m. CST

    If I were Peter Parker...

    by cylon_conspiracy

    I'd be really concerned that some other photographer is getting these exclusive Spidey photos and not me. Those pictures are my bread and butter. Also, I'd be extra cautious about having a man giving me a blow-job in public. It might be dark out, but someone might be watching. Once it's revealed that Spiderman is gay, accusations that he's more of a threat than a help will be the least of his worries.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:44 p.m. CST

    Oh, boy

    by Ditko

    You know, I was kinda middle of the fence about the suit, but it does look like shit.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:45 p.m. CST

    Looks like spidey's takin ol' one eyed jack to the optometrist

    by UltraTron

  • Uh oh

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:47 p.m. CST

    Oh lord..

    by shutupfanboy

    It just keeps getting worse and worse with these pics. The 1970s TV show maybe considered Emmy worth after this.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:48 p.m. CST

    Well, I guess HE DOES have an organic web shooter!!!

    by abbottcostello

    That suit looks like crap. Did they pull those eyes off the old '70's TV Show?! Ugh, I think this movie's gonna blow worse than Elektra & Wolverine combined!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:49 p.m. CST

    Look at the unit on that guy!

    by rev_skarekroe

    When does he make out with Madonna?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:49 p.m. CST

    I'm hoping that this is just his early wrestling outfit

    by SifoDyasJr

    It looks VERY close to the one Peter wore in Spider-man: With Great Power mini. See what I mean: http://tinyurl.com/4lrouwu

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:53 p.m. CST

    They've insulted us...

    by ZOMBRE

    and embaressed themselves with this costume re-design. In addition to the Bat Nips, this reminds me of the Green Power Ranger costume that Willem Dafoe waved his arms around in. I bet the Vulture is gonna be in a wheelchair. But ITS GONNA BE AN AWESOME LOOKING WHEELCHAIR!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:54 p.m. CST

    Costume is a total bummer

    by Thunderbolt Ross

    Especially the "shoes".

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:56 p.m. CST

    Awful, awful costume... [Rant mode]

    by Desk

    Alongside Chris Reeve's Superman suit and Downey Jr's Iron Man armour, Maguire's Spider-Man outfit was one of the best ever translations of a superhero costume onto the big screen. Why be so arrogant and foolish as to screw around so radically with something so universally well-received? The only answers I can come up with is either the new production team's arrogant ambition to stamp their own identity on the franchise or a cynical desire to create a distinctive new line of merchandising. Either way, it's a fundamental misjudgement bound to draw the ire of potential cinema-goers who should be the film's guaranteed audience - the comic fans - and raises massive doubts about this production as a whole.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:57 p.m. CST

    Hope he's got dubs on that Chrysler

    by Kiera Knightley's Sexy Beanpole

    sing it! SPIDER PIMP, SPIDER PIMP

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:57 p.m. CST

    I have a lot of faith in the talent behind this movie, but...

    by SithMenace

    I really kind of hate that costume. I thought they were gonna go with more of a Ditko look, but I guess that would have been too close to Raimi's film. That costume was highly modified, but it still had that classic Spider-Man look. More than this one anyway. Now I'm kind of worried about the Green Goblin costume for the second film.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:57 p.m. CST

    by MikeTheSpike

    "70s Spidey show"? What Spider-Man show existed in the 1970s? Am I missing something?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 2:59 p.m. CST

    costume is....weird. it thinks its the crotch area that looks off.

    by THE_ONE_MAN_GANG

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:02 p.m. CST

    Are they using the spidey that runs around Hollywood Blvd?

    by sweeneydave

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:04 p.m. CST

    mikesthespike: the spiderman show from the 70s.

    by UltraTron

    Yeah you must have missed it.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:08 p.m. CST

    wtf is going on with this movie

    by elsewhere

    One minute I love it. Next I hate it. This fucker is still over a year away from release, so probably won't be seeing any footage for awhile. ughhhhhhhh

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:08 p.m. CST

    also, why does everyone hate Spidey 3 so much?

    by Ditko

    Most of the hate goes to the dancing and emo Pete scenes. I thought they were hilarious and a riot. Oh well, what do I know.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:11 p.m. CST

    also another site is reporting

    by elsewhere

    there will be multiple Spider-Men?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:11 p.m. CST

    He did that same flip move in the first movie

    by D.Vader

    When he's taking out the gang before posing for the camera.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:13 p.m. CST

    They should have kept the costume simple :(

    by CodeName

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:13 p.m. CST

    Now, Spidey looks like the Guyver.

    by CodeName

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:14 p.m. CST

    ditko, dont talk about Spiderman 3

    by yourSTEPDADDY

    your non-hatred for it will make you an idiot apparently... at least thats from my experience from admitting to liking it more than 1 or 2 PS: the only problem with Spiderman 3 is that it goes to show you they horribly miscast Peter Parker... Topher Grace nailed Peter perfectly (although he wasnt Peter)

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:14 p.m. CST

    Now I know why his crotch is dark

    by JackieJokeman

    The fabric has been soaked with man slobber

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:15 p.m. CST

    "oh well, what do I know."

    by elsewhere

    and there's your answer, ditko. :-)

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:15 p.m. CST

    Yeaaaaaah. Even for a stunt-suit, that design is awful

    by D.Vader

    Not a fan.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:16 p.m. CST

    What's he doing to his face?

    by Juggernaut125

    I think he's about to unload on the guy with his 'organic web shooter'.. nudge nudge wink wink.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:17 p.m. CST

    "Now, Spidey looks like the Guyver." haha

    by yourSTEPDADDY

    good call. maybe Mark Hamill and "JJ" can make an appearance... BTW, there should be more Guyver movies

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:25 p.m. CST

    Where are the straps??

    by Snookeroo

    Dammit, this costume needs STRAPS or it's not official Marvel Movie Material®!!!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:25 p.m. CST

    I'm not a fan of Raimi's Spiderman films.

    by chewyou812

    That being said, this looks even worse.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:26 p.m. CST

    who's head of Marketing for SPIDERMAN?!

    by Weapon M

    OMG! They should get a kick in the asss!! So many people are seeing the Spiderman suit prematurely. Surely you could get an official picture of Spiderman up soon! A photo for godsake! Instead of having pictures like Spiderman here facefucking some poor guy! The costume looks terrible. I'm trying to be an optimist cause I'm such a Spiderman fan but this is aweful! They think this is getting good publicity for the movie? People are loosing hope for this damn film. There is still enthusiasm for the film DESPITE the terrible photos of Spiderman. I mean- and why is Spidermans crotch BLACK! It looks like he burn it ironing his costume or something. Or is that a place to keep the symbiote warm? They are stretching the liberties you can take with the Spiderman costume really. They need some good photos to combat all the aweful ones popping up. Marketing department should get a kick in the ass.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:27 p.m. CST

    This costume better be only half lit at all times...

    by alienindisguise

    cuz with every new pic of it, it looks like dog shit. The costume designer obviously sucked a cock to get the job because that person has NO skill!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:30 p.m. CST

    Costume = Fixing what ain't broke

    by quantize

    and please Webb, don't patronise us with any excuses..it looks incredibly limp

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:33 p.m. CST

    The more I see of SPider-Man, the most I dislike it.

    by Playkins

    Conversely, the more I see of Cap, the more I dig it.

  • but since they got rid of the red that normally goes around Spider-Man's waist/hips, it looks like the whole red part on his chest is just pointing down to his dick. The whole costume is like designed to lead your eyes towards his package. Maybe the spiderbite gave him an abnormally large dick, and he wants to show it off. I mean, he is a teenager.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:40 p.m. CST

    He needs to work on this quads and calves

    by coconutgroves

    He looks Ethiopian.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:40 p.m. CST

    Terrible looking suit.

    by jimmy_009

    Are they planning to CGI over a lot of that? Because it looks horrid.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:41 p.m. CST

    This really blows!!!

    by tbdeinc

    There's no amount of acting or action that will convince me to go see this movie...

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:41 p.m. CST

    Why is groin a different color?

    by jimmy_009

    Are they trying to draw attention to it on purpose? Because that's exactly what they're doing by making it the only part of the costume with that color. If that's what it looks like in the movie somebody should probably not be an art director.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:43 p.m. CST

    And the obvious airbrushed muscle shadows....

    by jimmy_009

    Seriously, tell me this isn't real. Someone got paid to design and make that costume? Really?...

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:43 p.m. CST

    I hate that costume more and more with each leaked photo.

    by Royston Lodge

    'nuff said.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:44 p.m. CST

    Why don't they take a fraction of the budget...

    by tbdeinc

    And GeorgeLucas the webshooters into the last 3 movies...

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:45 p.m. CST

    Spiderman: The Easiest Superhero to Play

    by Fridge

    Has Garfield even been on set once yet? Also, those eyes look pretty derp, hope they clean that up in post.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:45 p.m. CST

    bilboring, I agree about Spider-Man 3

    by SithMenace

    Sandman and Goblin 2 for the main villains, have Brock turn right at the end, sort of like what they did with Harry at the end of Spider-Man 2. In fact the fast shot of the camera zooming into Venom's face should have been at the end of the film. Maybe even set up Electro or Kraven, or use the Lizard which you've been teasing about for three films. Have Connors mix the symbiote dna with lizard dna and inject himself halfway through the film, then don't show him again until the 4th movie. But there were other problems too. Sandman should have just been a bank robber, shouldn't have been Uncle Ben's killer (that one plot point stripped all three films of meaning) and should have had clearer intentions towards Spider-Man. Sometimes simple evil does actually work. Although we are talking about a villain that defeated with a vacuum cleaner in his first appearance. Harry should have been in his father's suit. It would have been a great mind fuck for Peter the first time he saw him, and the design was way cooler than Harry's. Change the mask if you don't want to repeat the first film. There should have been no drama between MJ and Peter except for maybe a little jealousy over Gwen and some confusion about his changed personality. Save Peter's drama for his competition with Eddie and his struggle with the symbiote. Oh and crime fighting. No Kirsten Dunst singing, just have her as the star in a musical with a great song, and intercut some drama with a villain while Peter's watching the play. Don't have MJ kidnapped for a third time. Try something different for a big finish, like Harry trying to kill her and Peter having to stop both him and Sandman. More J Jonah Jameson. But the biggest kick in the balls for SM3? No Danny Elfman. He was fired by Raimi and the film ended up being terrible. Kharma's a bitch. I did like evil Peter though, I thought that was funny as hell.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:46 p.m. CST

    Truer words...

    by FastEddie8139

    "Spidey's commin" He sure is, kids. He sure is.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:49 p.m. CST

    Who is in charge...Ray Charles?

    by clavo

    Seriously? Can't the powers that be see how horrible that costume is? Those F-ing eye thingies are redicoulous! I will skip this nightmare fuel of a movie on that alone!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:50 p.m. CST

    you are so on the money!

    by clavo

    I have to agree...I hate this costume more and more too.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:53 p.m. CST

    Not a lot of people here understand how films are made I guess

    by IndustryKiller!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:54 p.m. CST

    Me thinks...

    by clavo

    Me thinks there is a mole in the Spiderman corner! Why else would these horrorroso pics be out without any problem? I just hope that all these pics are from the forthcoming porno movie of the same name, but not the big budget Spiderman that we are all waiting to see. How embarrasing! Maybe they keep double dog daring each other to take these scary pics...

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:56 p.m. CST

    Classic overreaction

    by Kammich

    Some of you are damning this movie, claiming you won't see it, and likening it to the "Twilight" franchise... based off of some fan-captured pics of a stuntman in the costume. Seriously? This is why a lot of "fanboys" get a bad reputation. Novel concept: wait for some fucking studio footage before you condemn the thing. You literally no NOTHING about this movie yet. None of us do. I'm not even a staunch defender of this film, or someone particularly excited about its prospects... I just get greatly annoyed at the infinitesimal reasons why a select few of you lose your shit.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:56 p.m. CST

    These set pics are actually kind of cool

    by SithMenace

    http://tinyurl.com/49afhnq

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:58 p.m. CST

    ditko

    by BetaRayBill07

    People hate Spider-Man 3 because it wasn't SP 1 or 2. It wasn't a bad film, it just wasn't near 1 or 2.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 3:59 p.m. CST

    Garfield may be as nerdy as MacGuire

    by smackfu

    but the main difference is, he actually comes across as a human being with recognizable emotions. Toby MacGuire looks like he's in a perpetual state of shock, like he's just been through some kind of life altering trauma that has left him unable to feel or express anything.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4 p.m. CST

    Oh My God

    by BetaRayBill07

    This...idk. I want this to be great. I just have a bad feeling about it.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:03 p.m. CST

    Thing to keep in mind about the suit

    by smackfu

    is that any spidersuit, including the last one, is going to look like absolute shit under sterile lighting and on a bad camera. The suit wasn't made to look good walking around a city street, it was made to look good under very specific lighting and camera conditions. The one professional, processed shot of this suit we've seen looks fantastic so I wouldn't worry about it. My only concern is the eyes. I hope the shiny metallic look is just for shooting functionality and will be different onscreen.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:04 p.m. CST

    Wrestling Getup

    by DoctorGustav

    Oh, I think I see. This is Spiderman's preliminary suit, when he started as a wrestler. Might explain the crazy hoyay grappler pose too.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:04 p.m. CST

    Andrew Garfield would make a fantastic Norman Bates

    by SithMenace

    if they ever rebooted Psycho.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:08 p.m. CST

    That's some seriously Chinese Web looking sh*t right there

    by tronknotts

    Hope it looks better in the actual film, but I'm not holding my breath.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:15 p.m. CST

    Costume? Seems ok

    by Shady Drifter

    Not bothered about the costume. Don't get the negative fuss... it is a funny picture though... Spidey's got a bulge in his pants in the second pic, and in the first one his doing very dubious stuff with that man's face :-)

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:17 p.m. CST

    Theb mask is still on unlike Raimi Spider-Man!

    by HollywoodHellraiser

    Toby has such an ego.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:18 p.m. CST

    "2011: A Spider-man epic failure odyssey"

    by Tristan

    And I thought Spider-man 3 was bad... First, the musical and now the shit that's going on with this reboot? Not a good year for Spidey. Do we even know who the fucking villian(s) are in this? I think Raimi made the Spidey films a little too friendly/campy, but I keep thinking this reboot will be the "Twilight" Spider-man =/

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:19 p.m. CST

    The first picture looks like

    by Redhead_Redemption

    Two dudes were having a party in the basement and one guy found his brothers spiderman halloweeen costume and the other dude said "put it on and climb on my face, we'll make a youtube video"

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:19 p.m. CST

    This reminds me of the 70s tv Spiderman

    by Carl's hat

    Cheesy, tacky, cheap...I loved it. Mind you Nicholas Hammond wasn't copping blow jobs off the baddies back then.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:22 p.m. CST

    Best. Commercial. Ever.

    by SithMenace

    Look for it during the Super Bowl Sunday... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R55e-uHQna0

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:23 p.m. CST

    what are those stupid silver things on his feet??

    by DrPain

    almost ruins the entire costume for me.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:24 p.m. CST

    That's what I'm talking about dawg

    by tronknotts

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0511081/

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:24 p.m. CST

    looks far better than the raimi suit...more realistic

    by FleshMachine

    i mean really where did toby get that perfect thing...oh i dunno...hollywood??!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:25 p.m. CST

    This looks like it could be "Batman & Robin" bad

    by darthvedder81

    I didn't like the Tobey Maguire Spider-Man either though. It's fundamentally a stupid concept (a guy in a spider suit with spider powers?). I don't think it's possible to make a movie called "Spiderman" that isn't retarded.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:28 p.m. CST

    Would rather have seen a Raimi directed "Spider-Man 4"

    by ChickenStu

    Preferably with Tobey Maguire as Spidey. Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 are pretty good movies (especially the second one which is flat out fucking AWESOME). The third one WAS a dissapointment, BUT it's not Raimi's fault, and I think he did the best with the material that the studios forced him to go with. And besides. For all of 3's faults, it still kept the emotional core intact - and I thought the resolution of the Parker/Osbourne story, and the emotion and pathos of the Sandman character was quite well executed. They just fucked it up by shoe-horning in Venom (a story-line which need a Spider-man movie of it's own). Some of the big-wigs at Marvel/Columbia say that this new reboot is a response to the "negative reaction" afforded to Spider-Man 3. Well, with a gross revenue of $890,871,626 in box office takings, not to mention merchandise and DVD sales... all I can say is - if that's considered a dissapointment in some way, then I want a life FULL of those kinds of dissapointments. (and contrary to popular belief, a lot of the reviews weren't all too bad). Should have given Raimi once more chance. This whole reboot idea seems a bit half-baked to me.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:28 p.m. CST

    If the feet things are web shooters....

    by Redhead_Redemption

    I will kill everyone in the theatre Inglorious Bastards style

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:30 p.m. CST

    why are the eyes darkened? they should be white.

    by DrPain

    I tried to like this suit but it's just not growing on me. I reminds me of that Japanese Spiderman costume from the 70's.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:31 p.m. CST

    by MikeTheSpike

    What the living Jesus? There was a live-action Spider-Man show in the 70s and nobody ever jokes about or references it?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:33 p.m. CST

    Also, web shooting wrist devices are a mistake

    by ChickenStu

    One of the best decisions Raimi EVER made was to have Parker's body make the stuff naturally. That was an absolute ace in the hole.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:33 p.m. CST

    Good ol Spidey Webs

    by bloodawn5

    I guess he still has the Organic Web

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:36 p.m. CST

    And there are still people around here who think that

    by CreasyBear

    Raimi's first two Spider-Man movies sucked. Aside from Spidey being a little light on the one-liners during the fights, what are these people complaining about? Kirsten Dunst's orthodontistry? Really? Those first two movies were absolutely amazing, with real care shown to the characters involved, and with no "make it black and edgy" modernization bullshit. Spider-Man and SM2 are great movies, among the best in the superhero genre. Blows my mind some people actually hated those movies.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:37 p.m. CST

    Now here's a costume:

    by DrPain

    http://hollywoodhatesme.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/spiderman.jpg

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:39 p.m. CST

    I dont know whats worse, Costume or Pose

    by Saen

    Spiderman face raping his enemies or having some really silly ass costume. Which one.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:45 p.m. CST

    Too Skinny

    by Turd Furgeson

    Ok I get the high school spiderman thing, but spiderman is supposed to have a thin upper body and larger legs to support all the jumping and running... Macguire never got huge, he just looked physical...

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:46 p.m. CST

    creasybear, the lack of one-liners was a problem for me

    by yourSTEPDADDY

    and Tobey McGuire was just horrible as Spidey to me. plus, the 2nd one was so long and boring (minus train fight but then it turned Jesusy with the arms spread out). also, the 2nd one was very "emo" to me. people may hate the "emo" sequence in 3 but that was quite funny to me (who knew Tobey could be funny?!) all I know is, I wont turn to SM1 or SM2 if Im bored, whereas I have turned to 3 plenty of times when I was bored. that last action scene was fuckin great TO ME the only reason TO ME that it is held in such high regards because there was no good superhero movies before then. now that we have Batman Begins and Dark Knight, we can make better judgements when it comes to hero films

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:47 p.m. CST

    Costume looks like shit...

    by SA_Rhyno

    ... why is the crotch black?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:48 p.m. CST

    Can we talk a bit more about these slippers?

    by Pigdog

    I can tolerate a majority of the costume changes and personally I think Garfields build is perfect for spider-man. But those silver slip ons are just not working. Fair enough if they have a deliberate purpose but do they have to be so IN YOUR FACE? I mean they have gone to the effort in making the suit slightly more plausible for someone to knock together then they go and put some tricked out space age silver slippers on him, WTF?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:50 p.m. CST

    This Doesn't Look Good

    by kevinwillis.net

    But it will make money. But I just can't see the betrayed friend from the Social Network as Spiderman.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 4:52 p.m. CST

    Allow me to enlighten you, creasybear, whyt he Raimi films suck

    by IndustryKiller!

    Macguire played Parker as a Revenge of the Nerds archetype, zero character development with one wide eyed "oh dear!" expression throughout all three films. There were seriously more subtle nerds on Save By the Bell. That's just not Peter Parker, who quickly after high school develops into a well adjusted and cool guy.<P>Don't get me started on Dunsts petulant, bland Mary Jane. Showing NONE of the verve of her comic book counterpart she becomes a faceless love interest who seems to have the identical "We love each other....nevermind no we don't....but we do!" conversation over and over and over again.<P>Then there are the wasted villains. Does Norman Osbourne seem like The Joker to Peter Parker's Batman? Not in the Sam Raimi film he didn't. In that ridiculously horrible costume he comes off as perfunctory villain du jour, despite the excellent casting of Willem Defoe. Cackling around and looking stupid, that's the extent of the role. Likewise for Spider Man 2, they cast another great character actor then sidelined him with a ridiculous "Batman the TV show" level plot device (I NEED THE TRIDIUM!) that had nothing to do with anything. All the while the lead actors continue to suck mind you, and James Franco looks bored with a look of "God, I wish they would give me something to do, I'm the best actor in this fucking movie."<P>While raimi is adept at shooting fight sequences, he has no sense of character, and Peter's relationships seem more like a hassle rather than the lifeblood of the film. Then there's his tendency to lay on the humor a little, how shall we say, thick? By the end of SM2 I wanted to scream "I fucking get it! Parker has bad luck, move the fuck on!" Aunt may is a non-entity, and while J.K. Simmons is entertaining, he's hardly the gruff, intimidating, Bill O'Reilly-ish, egomaniac who treads dangerously close to being a villain of a different kind portrayed in the best iterations of the comic, it's just impossible to take him seriously.<P>Then there's Spider man 3, which is every bit as awful a movie as Batman & Robin. A huge fucking joke of a film that should have never made it past the script stage. When people use the term "hate crime on cinema" it's about cynical pieces of shit like Spider Man 3, in which every bit of Raimi's disdain at having to make it is right there on screen, poking you with a sharp stick.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:03 p.m. CST

    The 1977 Spider-man TV show costume looked better than this

    by Chuck_Chuckwalla

    Hell, even the Electric Company's costume looked better. Sony, what the fuck?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:03 p.m. CST

    To quote Nigel Tuffnel:

    by scrote

    'Is this a joke?'

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:05 p.m. CST

    Like 'Hulk', i actually quite like Spiderman 3 as a Raimi film

    by Smack_Teddy

    i just think its a pretty bad Spiderman film when it comes down to it. Works as a Bizzaro or 'What if?...' Spidey pretty well i guess.<p> You know the difference between these publicity shots and those under Raimi's films? They apparantly dont care so much about what you see that isnt a actual shot from the movie or some shiney photoshopped poster. I wouldn't freak out so much, not just yet anyway.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:06 p.m. CST

    sithmenace

    by Kammich

    That is some inspired casting, re: Garfield as Bates. Hopefully there's never a need to resurrect Psycho(again), but he'd make a brilliantly creepy Norman. Also, good job posting those other set pics. The costume looks 10 times better and thats only due to the slightest change of lighting and ambience in the pictures. I think we can all agree that the studio shot looked excellent, so I'm not judging a damn thing by street shots. Re: Raimi's Spider-man movies... I could write essays on those movies. I grew up a Spidey fan and those movies came along in my formative years as a film goer(I was 13 when the first one came out). Honestly, the bottom line is that they're pure comic book pulp. They captured the true feel of a comic book more than any comic book films before or after. But that doesn't necessarilly make them great films: they've aged very, very poorly. They will go down as a triumph of their time, I think; they were arguably the driving force behind the comic book movie craze. But it was time for some fresh blood. Webb has potential based off of a limited resume. The casting has been outside of the box and fairly inspired. I'm not going to judge anything beyond that until I see some studio footage, because anything else would be unfair.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:10 p.m. CST

    thought 3 was bad? SM reboot will be worse than 'STEEL'

    by awepittance

    mark my words, this will be the most critically panned and badly executed super hero film in a very very long time.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:10 p.m. CST

    I can see the gay jokes come a mile away

    by AsimovLives

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:12 p.m. CST

    There are movies that I simply don't feel compelled to see

    by Dark Knight Lite

    and this is one of them. Until the next reboot, I'll enjoy Raimi's first two films, and call it a day. The costume is so badly (over) designed that I seriously doubt that I could find any enjoyment in the new film.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:15 p.m. CST

    You're right Chuck

    by scrote

    ...and in the other shots on popsugar why is there a second spidey in the car, bg

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:16 p.m. CST

    happy birthday

    by maxjohnson1971

    to George Romero and Alice Cooper.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:17 p.m. CST

    Seriously, the guy looks like he's slashed his cods...

    by scrote

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:17 p.m. CST

    "Bathroom break, boss?"

    by scrote

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:18 p.m. CST

    juice willis

    by maxjohnson1971

    I see a cross promotion of the Air Spideys and the movie now. It has got to happen. And that costume looks terrible. Just bad.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:19 p.m. CST

    i wonder if it's just the flash from the camera

    by stu_pickles

    having the same affect on his suit as it would to anne hathaway's shirts

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:26 p.m. CST

    I'm less concerned with the costume

    by cylon_conspiracy

    and more concerned with all these shots of Spider-Man having sex with strange men in public spaces. Another site has a pic of him where it appears he's being anally penetrated. Clearly the storyline for this new Spidey is going to be much different than the previous films. Nothing wrong with a homosexual Peter Parker, but this isn't the way to tell the fans that's where the story is headed. That story element should have been revealed with more tact and respect. As for the costume itself, it's going to look fine in the actual MOVIE. There are probably multiple costumes and this is the "Running around outside and being slammed against stuff" costume. And you can fix a lot of stuff with the computers these days. I bet those shoes will be digitally removed in post. The black crotch is probably undies showing through and that will probably be fixed in post too.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:26 p.m. CST

    That costume if FUGLY

    by davywankenobi

    I cannot believe they went with that shitty outfit. I would hate to judge this movie by that costume, but every picture is progressively crappier. Ross did some pretty frickin cool concepts a few years ago. Too expensive or logical to use those?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:27 p.m. CST

    kammich

    by SithMenace

    I also grew up a Spidey fan, reading the three main titles and then Mcfarlane's. The Raimi films were a blessing at the time, despite some mistakes, but you're right, those films are not aging well. The reboot looks like it's gonna have some great action scenes though. I especially like the shot of the cop swiping at Spidey as he climbs the truck.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:30 p.m. CST

    Are those Alex Ross eyes?

    by thot

    Always thought the Ross black lens look would be cool. They look very different than the earlier "leaked" photos. Overall, I'm liking the suit. Quite different but with a total reboot, ya gotta change it up. I'm encouraged.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:33 p.m. CST

    oh and kammich

    by SithMenace

    I'm also pretty impressed with the casting on this film. Sheen as Uncle Ben pretty much says it all. Not too crazy about Sally Field though, but that would be my only complaint about the casting.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:40 p.m. CST

    IndustryKiller!

    by CreasyBear

    I respect your reasoning, but some of the things you seem to wish the movie had are things that wouldn't have worked. For example, JJJ being a dangerous almost-villain would be meaningless in that movie unless that was the arc of his character. That part of his character is true in the comics' sweeping arcs, but that isn't where the time-constricted movie is going. Being a bombastic blowhard to create some friction for Peter's attempts to gain his footing post-school (and to get some of the best laughs from the audience) fit the story well. And for the love-story angle, the opening line of narration makes it clear the story is heading for the more classic tale of getting-the-girl despite the odds, rather than a story of the multi-layered intricacies of a complex relationship. I suppose they could have cut out all the superhero action to make more room for this. But I'm glad they didn't. As for Doc Ock's tritium, yeah, it was a Maguffin, but I don't consider that old plot element to be a story-killer, especially in a comic book adaptation. For Maguire, the anger at the robber, the sadness of losing Ben, and the frustration of not being able to manage all the elements of his life in SM2 were far more than him just aping Screech. With moments like the New Yorker citizen reaction to SM's appearance, the recklessness of his first foray into web-swinging against the robber, the dizzying feel of the skyscraper swings, and Peter's speech to Mary Jane in the hospital, I found a lot to like in those first two movies. I respect your posts and your opinions, but I just plain enjoyed the experience of watching those movies.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:40 p.m. CST

    1970's TV Show???

    by K3nn3th

    This looks like the costume from that 1970's live action tv show. Spiderman's Costume is supposed to have White Eyes NOT RaY BaN Shades!!!!!!!!!!!!! Disney please sue Sony and Get Spidey Back in the right hands at Marvel!!!!!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:44 p.m. CST

    Peeps

    by BERSERKR

    Your to quick to judge, the suit looks alright and we have yet to see a true shot from the movie or trailer, plus all those people complaining Spidey isnt big enough, shut the fuck up, he is supposed to be skinny you morons.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:48 p.m. CST

    asimovlives

    by smackfu

    Really? It's a shot of Spiderman shoving his crotch into a guys face and you're predicting gay jokes? Ladies and Gentleman, Nostradamus has returned!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:50 p.m. CST

    Mr. Peepers?

    by Horgy

    Why is Spidey doing a Mr. Peepers impression, humping that guy's face?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 5:54 p.m. CST

    Not that there's anything wrong with that...

    by GroolDemon

    http://www2.b3ta.com/spidermanwillmakeyougay/ Sorry... all these weird Spidey pics made me think of this old vid.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:02 p.m. CST

    looks like the time George fell on Jerrys head

    by Smack_Teddy

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:06 p.m. CST

    The Electric Company...

    by Mephisto the Great

    ...had a Spider Man that was far better than this poser. "Spider Man...nobody knows who you arrrrrrrre..."

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:18 p.m. CST

    Ugly, ugly costume.

    by catlettuce4

    Not sure what they are doing with it, and now to see these black creepy eyes... it's just not a good look at all. They nailed the costume previously, and now we get this garbage?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:22 p.m. CST

    I got used to

    by lead_sharp

    the Cap costume, I could see where it was coming from. The Thor costume eventually grew on me when I realised it was a blend of just about everything in the comics. The GL costume is pretty spot on, with added texture and a change of glove colour but spot on. EVEN the god awful helmet on Magneto LOOKS like a helmet (on a 'tard) but this fucking thing? Why??? Just stick to what we know, it works. Don't mind the actor or the mechanical shooters or the small eyes or virtually anything else really but that costume is absolutely ugly, it won't look better in motion or under 'proper lighting' we've seen stills, we've seen the whole thing and honestly I've seen better cosplay than this.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:23 p.m. CST

    It looks like...

    by catlettuce4

    ...Ever see those cheap bootleg Spidey action figures from other countries? Spitting image here.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:26 p.m. CST

    Droppin' fuckin loads!

    by Badger23

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:29 p.m. CST

    Spider-Taint!

    by ZapRowsdower

    http://home.comcast.net/~yeahyeah11/TAINT.jpg

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:44 p.m. CST

    by Scuzz1974

    "Chinese Web". I just had awful flashbacks of Spider-Man Kung-Fu fighting.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:48 p.m. CST

    this looks worse everytime I see something new

    by yeah i'm a jerk!

    Honestly, this movie is starting to make the Spiderman tv series with Nicholas Hammond look good. Stop it.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 6:56 p.m. CST

    YEAP HE IS GAY

    by KilliK

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 7:16 p.m. CST

    That costume still looks like ASS!!

    by Uncle Stan

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 7:19 p.m. CST

    Gay fighting...crap suit = waste of time & $$$

    by marineboy

    I ask you, why?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 7:25 p.m. CST

    hes so gay next he'll be breaking out the anal sex with Gwen

    by Smack_Teddy

    shes that Gay too. Yeah, i'm glad you guys arn't making movies in the pop culture hemisphere.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 7:43 p.m. CST

    Ugh...

    by THX1968

    This flick is going to be a failure of massive proportions. Very upsetting when one of your favorites gets this treatment. I just want it to come and go so I can just get over it and let the healing begin.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 7:48 p.m. CST

    Is he fucking Reptile from MK in the face?

    by Willbraham

    I knew this movie was doomed when the Robert Pattinson giraffe clone was chosen to helm it. Putrid anus raping trash

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8 p.m. CST

    exactly!

    by plisskenman

    thats exactly what came to mind when seeing that suit, welcome back to 1978!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:06 p.m. CST

    It's funny that after all these years you guys still haven't learned

    by MattmanReturns

    not to predict a film's quality based on behind the scenes pictures snapped on somebody's cell phone.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:14 p.m. CST

    I really hate this costume

    by dukeroberts

    Why is it so hard to get the simplest thing right?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:22 p.m. CST

    If you look really closely at Spidey's eyes

    by Amazing Maurice

    you'll see the reflection of Sam Raimi shaking his head.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:22 p.m. CST

    when i clicked to open a post...

    by emeraldboy

    i was sent up to the top of the page....

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:25 p.m. CST

    Is Bryan Singer Directing this?

    by jazzylg

    Just an observation!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:27 p.m. CST

    ;( FFS I really hope.....

    by blackflowerX

    That this will blow me the fuck away...<br><br> But tbh , lets be real , it all looks very "Kick Ass" and thus "Very Lame"/"Seen it all before" .<br><br> I hope I'm wrong , I'm bored to fuck of writing negative shit (A.K.A "Wonder /Glee/Woman" etc etc) ...<br><br> Also....On a separate flat note :<br>Why the fuck can't somebody make an original Super Hero/Sci fi flick thats not filled with tragic fail ?????!!!!!!<br><br> I love "The Dark Knight" but it was still not perfect, the whole corporate bastardization of all we love and hope for in this genre is simply getting well old , and I'm starting to not give a shit . <br><br> Don't the suits realize that they will make more money in the long run if they actually give us something (intelligent and R rated) worth watching?

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:37 p.m. CST

    this is all bull shit

    by emeraldboy

    for the following reasons. there is no www.spiderman4.com website and sony have not booked that domain yet. they have just announced the cast. the movie is out next year. spiderman 4 is sony's big tent pole movie for next summer. having looked at the official site, there is nothing there for spiderman 4. so all these pics are fake. the marketing campaign will begin to crank up from the summer. the only thing we do know is who is in it and not what the film is about.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:40 p.m. CST

    Kirsten Dunst's nipples > Kirsten Dunst's snaggletooth

    by DickBallsworth

    Believe it.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:45 p.m. CST

    ok....

    by emeraldboy

    this is the reboot of the raimi/ maguire franchise. i know that. the point i am making is that these photos are bs. that's all...

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 8:53 p.m. CST

    yeah, emeraldboy

    by rev_skarekroe

    Somebody shut down a city street, hired an enormous camera crew, sewed together a custom Spider-Man wetsuit, got a guy to do stunt and wirework in said wetsuit, Photoshopped a promotional picture of Andrew Garfield in the suit and convinced Sony to officially release it just to fool nerds on the internet. You're right, that's pretty cut and dry. Now tell us who's REALLY behind 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 9:01 p.m. CST

    This movie looks absolutely terrible.

    by Ivan_Mtl

    Everything I have seen so far leads me to believe that the new Spiderman reboot is going to be an epic failure. I've always wondered if filmmakers know that they are making a bad movie while they are in the middle of shooting it. That is the one question I would love to be asked during the publicity tour for this inevitable critical and (hopefully) financial failure.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 9:07 p.m. CST

    Spider-man 3 is looking...

    by codecrackx15

    ...like it deserves a fucking oscar nod compared to this shit!!! Air Spidy's, no belt, fucked up gloves, no webbing on the costume, Red spider on the back that you can't see, What the fuck else??? The pic looks like he took a piss in his pants and darkened them up. Spidy's suits, Cap's Suit, and Thor's suit all suck ass. This next generation of comic book movies are looking like an epic fail!!!

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 9:58 p.m. CST

    anyone else

    by macheesmo3

    think this looks just horrifically terrible? It seriously looks like a made for Sci Fi channel Spiderman movie..... Maybe this will just suck and make no money and put an end to the reboot nonesense.... Who am I kidding, it will suck and make $300million..............sigh

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10 p.m. CST

    Getting the same fucked up feelings

    by proevad

    that I had when I first saw Kevin Spacey in that bald cap a few years back...A huge TURD is coming our way boys and girls.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:07 p.m. CST

    Those Spidey pics suck.. check these out...

    by MST3KPIMP

    http://tinyurl.com/49afhnq tell me thats not more like it..

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:13 p.m. CST

    that suit!!

    by colonial_one

    the red and blue is off, way too much blue and the spider on the back isn't there! plus as mentioned above, the eyes look cheesy. this film will go the way of the last X-men, Electra, Daredevil and the Punisher movies. Based on the costume alone, I'll wait for the dvd. At least there are other superhero movies coming out.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:15 p.m. CST

    HERO TOMORROW = "Spider-Man meets Taxi Driver"

    by Daniel_S_Duvall

    Milo Miller (who co-wrote the movie HERO TOMORROW) says he conceived the project as "Spider-Man meets Taxi Driver." Fans of superhero films should check it out. www.herotomorrow.com/movie

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:19 p.m. CST

    Costume is worse than Catwoman

    by TheCAT7225

    REALLY???? I'm all for a little artistic license but this costume is TERRIBLE!!!! Who signed off on this??? Please let this be a joke.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:22 p.m. CST

    this will be the batman and robin of spidey movies

    by john

    sorry, but that suit is extremely homoerotic...no way did a 17 year old hs student design that

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:22 p.m. CST

    Most of you people are so incredibly stupid it's frightening

    by IndustryKiller!

    Do you fucking guys honestly have no concept of how films are COLOR CORRECTED after their shot? That the film is shot in 3-D, which darkens pictures, so it is probably being shot in a higher color contrast than it will appear on screen? Are you stupid enough to not see that the material on the fabric of the suit is thin ergo the cod piece is showing through in the bright light and will CLEARLY not be seen in the actual film. You don't get that the pics of him on top of that guy, which you've met with a disgusting amount of homophobia, is just rehearsal of a stunt?? Honestly, none of this registers?? Look at the god damn official promo shot. Fucking hell, imbeciles, this is seriously one of the most pathetic talkbacks....ever.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:35 p.m. CST

    Wanted: CGI house for digital costume replacement.

    by Movietool

    Need professional CG house to digitally replace every frame of hideous Spider-Man costume in upcoming film re-boot. Current outfit looks like Saban's Power Rangers: the Speed Skating Adventures. Need to make it look like traditional Spider-Man costume that EVERYONE ON THE PLANET knows and loves. We can't really explain why we let the director screw around with the second most iconic and recognizable superhero costume on the planet, but let's just say that photos of Avi Arad murdering nuns and clubbing baby seals was involved. Candidate will replace our in-house CGI department, who can't seem to get through two frames of work before falling over in fits of convulsive laughter.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:41 p.m. CST

    Um...

    by jwardlow

    Spidey's looking... fabulous. Should be the number one movie on opening weekend at the Fire Island Cineplex.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 10:42 p.m. CST

    the feet

    by tibbar

    i guarantee you those silver foot things are some devices so he can climb walls, i'm callin it now... which for some reason happen to look nike-ish in origin. god this suit is terrible.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 11:06 p.m. CST

    SPIDER-BULGE!

    by MrMysteryGuest

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 11:07 p.m. CST

    Are they filming the Spider-Man musical by accident?

    by MrMysteryGuest

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 11:13 p.m. CST

    The comic book Spider-Man has GOT to make fun of this and the musical!!!

    by MrMysteryGuest

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 11:18 p.m. CST

    Stan Lee

    by BetaRayBill07

    must be rolling over in his grave.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 11:18 p.m. CST

    let's hope for the best.......like Captain America...-_-

    by NorthTronic

    cuz well that just looks strange........very.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 11:24 p.m. CST

    Television Spidey

    by SchwarzenGollum

    This is starting to look like a Joel Schumacher revamped version of the 70s "Spider-Man" television series. The costume doesn't look very good - looks like a downgrade from the Raimi version.

  • Now this isn't a hard fast rule, but a lot of times it seems like they start mucking around with the costume, taking creative liberties with it, in order to compensate for a bad script.

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 11:39 p.m. CST

    its now official. I have no desire to see this movie

    by jupiterjim

    I pissed away $10.00 to get spiderman 3 on dvd and watched it once....this will be way worse

  • Feb. 4, 2011, 11:56 p.m. CST

    Not here to make friends are you, Industry Killer?

    by Laserbrain

    Your point about color-correction is sound but if you want most people to listen then maybe try it without the flaming.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 12:07 a.m. CST

    http://tinyurl.com/49afhnq

    by blackflowerX

    I love the shot of the cop fisting spidey up the ass LOL ;D<br><br> My point being that I guess all this might look very different after the finished product is done....<br><br>That , or maybe I have a secret authority based Spiderman fisting fetish ....Eeewww . ;o

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 12:09 a.m. CST

    Oh...

    by blackflowerX

    And for the mother fuckin' love of God , pleeeeease don't make his fuckin' mask keep falling off....

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 12:16 a.m. CST

    Industry Killer is spot on

    by Smack_Teddy

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 12:38 a.m. CST

    Alien!

    by Chanoc

    Dear God, in pic 1 of the full slideshow, Spidey looks like an Alien from a bad B-Movie!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 12:44 a.m. CST

    I just figured it out...

    by codecrackx15

    ...this is the English version. You know how they do everything ass backward on the other side of the pond? Well, this is their interpretation of Spider-man. The way to watch it will be to first go to the local pub...er...we would go to the bar. Drink several pints...uh...I mean FL OZ's and then head to the theater totally pissed...nope that's not right...drunk...that's it. Then watch this super hero Benny Hill flick and laugh your ass off. Just think, we get to do again for Superman!!!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 1:07 a.m. CST

    Explain, Industrykiller!...

    by FloatingHolmes

    How will they "color correct" a belt onto that shitfest? How will they "collor correct" those cavalry stripes off his legs? How will the big ass web shooters and mirror lenses and web-less red spaces all magically become part of an adequate Spider-Man costume by "color correction"? We all need the benefit of your awesome knowledge. Face-fucking that guy makes this horrible suit look better than it should. It provides context for this exquisitely effeminate design. But on its own, as a Spider-Man costume, (and dog help the movie if those silver slippers are for real) this is a perfect example of ruining a good thing. "Don't believe your eyes, it's not color corrected yet!" My ass.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 1:25 a.m. CST

    The more I see....

    by Grrrr....

    ...this costume the more I HATE IT!!!!!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 1:37 a.m. CST

    Toby Maguire's SPIDERMAN never fucked anyone in the face!!!

    by JonChambers

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:06 a.m. CST

    The black junk is obviously

    by inkingeekX

    A cup! Gotta protect the spiderballs. Seriously, I don't care how you "light" it-this is going to be terrible. It's a bit like the Chicago Cubs-they don't have to have a good team, because they sell out Wrigley Field anyway-people WILL see this and it WILL make millions to the detriment of the franchise

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:06 a.m. CST

    "you'll see the reflection of Sam Raimi shaking his head"

    by smackfu

    Yeah because Sam Raimi's filmmaking sensibilities are just so great. The first movie had Spiderman fighting a Power Ranger (take that, Gobby!), the second one was great, and the third one was a late term abortion. Let's not forget he cast Toby MacGuire and Kirsten Dunst in the two main roles. And used organic webshooters. And actually put a scene in the movie where just after noticing his body going through strange changes, Peter wakes up in the morning with this entire bed covered in sticky white goo. Let's be honest here, things came together very well for Spiderman 2, but for the most part for the entire trilogy Raimi was basically restraining himself (or being restrained) from making silly slapstick.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:07 a.m. CST

    Very sad.

    by Sean Finnesey

    I highly doubt the "Powers that be" are the least bit concerned.... But, come on!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:12 a.m. CST

    if this suit can be this gay

    by okayplease

    why not just put cap and wolverine and such in their full color comic book faithfuls? cause this shit is prolly worse

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:32 a.m. CST

    Bryan Singer would never do this.

    by Mojo-Wan

    Don't drag Bryan Singer insults into this. Bryan Singer once convinced Rebecca Romijn that blue body paint was a costume, and for that, I am forever grateful. No, this is Schumacher, Shumacher of the benippled costumes and rubber crotch and ass shots. But I'm not going to judge it by the one unfortunate picture. But yes, that costume makes Green Lantern's look like a classic.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:52 a.m. CST

    choke on a dick and die okayplease

    by Smack_Teddy

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:55 a.m. CST

    This talkback has been hilarious...

    by Toruk_Makto

    ...fucking your face in 2011..lol...oh man...that's priceless...

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:57 a.m. CST

    Looking quite awful so far...

    by jack Bauer

    Unless there's some CGI addition to the suit then its totally s**t, I hate saying it as I'm a massive late 60's to present day Spidey fan but this suit makes the web slinger look like he's auditioning as a gay dancer on a ballroom dancing show (no ballroom in the suit tho). As for these set piece photo's, what can I say, Spidey is getting a blow job!! I can understand getting a bit of the Spidey fun from the comics in but the way its translated is so camp its wrong. The hand stand into the back of a jeep from other footage looked silly, it didn't have the dynamics of the comic version. Spidey would have bounded in doing a front flip 10ft in the air into the truck, not that limp wristed handstand. I can see this film is aimed at the Twighlight watchers, all hormones and tender bits, it looks like its going to lack the grit needed and be a 'girly' flick.. Sorry ladies...

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 3:06 a.m. CST

    Spidey likes to fuck

    by smudgewhat

    Which doesn't mean this movie will be bad. It could be great. But that's my first joke.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 3:29 a.m. CST

    I'll always like Sam Raimi's SPIDER-MAN 2

    by AsimovLives

    It's the only Raimi Spidey movie i bought the DVD. The other two i find them flawed movies, but SPIDEY 2 is a great comic book movie, the best there was until a certain english upstart started making movies about a guy dressed as a bat fighting crime.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 3:30 a.m. CST

    Gay Spidey, i bet there's tonnes of slash fiction about that

    by AsimovLives

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 3:31 a.m. CST

    mojo-wan: you suddenly remind me of the greatest

    by UltraTron

    superhero costume ever. We need a naked wonder woman with just a tiny little something painted on.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4 a.m. CST

    Spider-man Spider-man Does whatever a Spider can

    by GornPirate

    Spins a web, any size, Catches thieves just like flies, then he puts his cock in their face....wait what?

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:11 a.m. CST

    the camp is just whats evoked from releasing set shots

    by Smack_Teddy

    THESE ARE NOT FINAL SHOTS. J B gets points for not being a mentally retarded satan-cock-sucking homophobe though.<p> I've said it once and ill say it again. Most of the gay jibes i bet come from Fast & Furious fans for example who cant hack the realisation that their beloved boys racing in hot rods flick actually is homoerotic as fuck in its nature. Going and looking to shift this innacuratly onto Spidey, and in signifying this is a bad thing becaus eits Gay, is just one of the most pathetic, weak minded childish-come-mentally-retarded things you AICN douchebags could be capable of doing. Well done, your in your own way managing to devolve and bring down humanity just that notch furthur. But you all have the priveldge of being allowed to remain in your 'tard bubble for quite a time yet in your actual lives outside these forumns don't you?. Choke on a dick and die, i sincerely hope.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:40 a.m. CST

    I agree with Childs...

    by Righteous Brother

    who posted somewhere way up there. I'm usually pretty forgiving with the costume designs on film - didn't mind the X-Men costumes, don't mind Cap or Thor. But I really *hate* that fucking costume design. It really needs the red belt part of the original costume, now it looks like he's got a big red inverted phallus on his torso. I'm happy about the mechanical webshooters though!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:44 a.m. CST

    seeing as you all seem to think these pics are real...

    by emeraldboy

    then I have a number of points , where are the pics of sally field as aunt may? there are no pics of Rhys Ifans as the villain no pics of the new mary jane watson. no pics of denis leary. when matt smith was revealed as the new dr who. the amount of bile that released on this site was unreal. smith of course is now accepted as the finest dr since the show began. my point is you all seem to overreact. apart from the cast and these photos. there has been very. little info on this film released to the public. sony's game here is i suspect is to make it appear that this looks cheap crap. how much does this film cost to make. and how are the studio spending on this. and we dont what the name of this film is apart from being the first rebooted spiderman movie.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:50 a.m. CST

    C. thomas Howell

    by emeraldboy

    has joined the name spiderman movie.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:51 a.m. CST

    I now leave all 9/11 ramblings...

    by emeraldboy

    to jim corr.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:55 a.m. CST

    Costume

    by SHADOWPRIME

    Going to withhold judgment until the movie - we have all seen production shots that didn't do justice to the final product - but at this point, not liking the footwear, whatever that is. Just doesn't work for me. But we'll see. And the codpiece thing? Yeah. Weird. Hoping that pic is somehow, well, just not representative. Yikes!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:55 a.m. CST

    Emeraldboy

    by ajt2111

    Well, these pics all seem to come from the same scene they're shooting. With that in mind, the one studio shot that's been sent out looks a lot better and color corrected ect. There are some shots out now of Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone(Playing Gwen Stacy, MJ isnt' going to be in this movie at all) Also, I highly doubt Sony's strategy is MAKE EM THINK IT'S SHIT! Though I do agree, as is the norm here, people are over reacting like crazy at this point. I'd say after some real footage, some official pics, and a synopsis maybe we'll have a better idea what to expect. PS it's completely fucking retarded to claim these pictures aren't real, of course they're real. They might not be SONY official, but they're real pics of the movie being shot, there are even videos of him doing a very cool web slinging stunt with a bunch of NYPD cars following below him.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:56 a.m. CST

    You do realise that this is all your fault fanboys! ;)

    by steverogers5

    Some of you all moaned and griped about how if he was to really have organic webshooters, then it should be coming out from where the sun don't shine no more.. Obviously they're now bending overbackwards to give you the realism that you asked for.. Wait till you see it in the finished movie where Spidey arcs his back and the webbing comes out over this poor shell shocked dude! ;)

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 5:01 a.m. CST

    My gosh this movie is going to be so awful.

    by Kai_Mah'gra

    ....every single successive leaked image has been violently worse that the previous one, and it's bad enough they fucked up the suit design with these cutsie new stuff that just doesn't work. This just brings back horrible memories from when they fucked up Superman Returns and after that first released image with the faded colors and leathered our Supes suit and the plastic looking logo, it was all downhill from there. If you can't get a simple thing like an iconic suit design which has lasted and worked effectively for 4 plus decades, then how in the world can you be trusted to get the story right at all. This movie is going to be a fuck-up of epic and colossal proportions. And then to add insult to injury, the McGuire Spiderman movies are not so far removed and will be looming over this new one like a constant reminder in the background, of when Spiderman actually worked on the big screen (the first 2, that is). I feel so bad for that Garfield kid. his career was just beginning to take off after Social network and all. Now he's just going to join Brandon Routh in the crap heap of 'could-have-been' actors who saw their careers derailed so early on with one fatal decision.

  • how fucking patronizing...since when did a decent detailed shot of a costume on set look radically different onscreen? twat

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 5:11 a.m. CST

    Spidermankini

    by InfinityWave

    Once you see it, you can't unsee it. D:

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 5:36 a.m. CST

    Flames on Spiderman's boots!

    by JackPumpkinhead

    Yeah, get that started and rolling.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:16 a.m. CST

    Why does Spidey

    by buggerbugger

    have an ant on his back? Is this subliminal advertising for the whenever-it's-finally-made 'Ant Man' film?

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:19 a.m. CST

    Why...

    by Grrrr....

    ...does everybody have so much hate for the suit in 'Superman Returns'? I personally didn't have issues with it. The problem with SR was it was a bit boring and overly long. It wasn't a train wreck that some of you make it out to be but it did have it's faults. This on the other hand looks K@K!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:23 a.m. CST

    Spidey's new catch phrase: "Suck it, bitch!"

    by AsimovLives

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:27 a.m. CST

    Everything is gay now

    by AsimovLives

    Star Trek, Captain America, Fantastic Four, Spider-Man now, and Superman will be gay too thaks to Snyder. Only Batman and Iron Man remain straights. They better start walking with their back always against the wall all the time.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:33 a.m. CST

    Superman Returns never altered the design of the costume...

    by tbdeinc

    All they did in Superman Returns is they embossed the S... The design was never altered. Here, Ditko's design is messed with... Big time! That's the difference.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:38 a.m. CST

    Superman Returns suffered from poor story telling...

    by tbdeinc

    And poor character traits... AND... It doesn't matter how much lighting and effects are done in the final movie... THE DESIGN OF THE COSTUME IS ALTERED.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:40 a.m. CST

    Correction...

    by tbdeinc

    It doesn't matter how much lighting and effects are done in the final movie... THE DESIGN OF SPIDER-MAN'S THE COSTUME IS ALTERED.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 7:08 a.m. CST

    REAL STUNTS, A REAL SPIDEY, A REAL COSTUME..

    by HollywoodHellraiser

    and A REAL GWEN! So far the positives is outweighing the negatives, IMO! And yet you guys only complain about the costume?! The costume isn't a big deal because it'll be clean up post-production. But I can't believe you guys aren't marveling in the stunts pics we've see so far! They have easily outperform Raimi shots vs. CGI everything. And not to mention so far the mask is torn, half-ripped, and have Peter/Spider-Man being recognize by half the city! I dunno whats next but I'm looking forward to this Spider-Man. Raimi is gone and its time to move on!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 7:23 a.m. CST

    It's Spider-Man!

    by jwhj2007

    Goddammit! :)

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 8:08 a.m. CST

    asimovlives are you serious and being an asshole

    by Smack_Teddy

    or are you just joking?

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 8:09 a.m. CST

    hollywood od'd using cgi

    by emeraldboy

    to the point where it got ridiculous. i could see there argument back then. cgi was dream for hollywood. they didnt have to build anything. everything could be done on computer. sometimes it was spectacular like spidey vs doc oc in the second film. if you look at hulk, that is where it looked stupid. but universal agreed with those who said a painted green body builder in a ripped shirt would look stupid and that audiences wouldnt by it. so we got cgi hulk instead. fantastic four looked cheap as chips as david dickenson says and looking back those films are odd. all the actors were really miscast except chicklis. and fishbourne added gravitas as the voice of the silver surfer.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 8:17 a.m. CST

    Its "web shooting" but not as we know it....

    by Father

    Get a room, you two......

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 8:24 a.m. CST

    Bruno does Spiderman

    by James_Camera_On

    This is just gay porn. To hell with it.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 8:51 a.m. CST

    Seriously...that costume is ass

    by KingKirby

    The big problem I ever had with the Toby Spidey suit was that , here's a character who supposedly is having huge money problems and comes up with a beautifully realized suit. But this thing looks like the XXX porn parody version. No...it ain't cool...it's fucking awful.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:06 a.m. CST

    Amateur production photos

    by LLcruize2

    Really, folks forming opinions based on unauthorized amateur production photos? You don't think any kind of coloring enhancement, cleaning up, will be done? Because we all know exactly what is shot is exactly what we see in the final film. Sheep. As I have posted elsewhere, I am stoked that we are seeing so many practical suited photos of Spidey in action. I enjoyed the Raimi trilogy, but really got tired of the CGI Spidey. I like the fact we are seeing so much practical action.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:07 a.m. CST

    Lets see Peter David Defend this shit.

    by Phategod100

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:15 a.m. CST

    Harumph!!!

    by cash55

    Is it to late to pull an Eric Stoltz on this costume?

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:20 a.m. CST

    Alien rape

    by raumohir

    That costume is half spider-man, half grey alien wanting to anally rape you. And all the way bad.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:24 a.m. CST

    Next time somebody says that Spider-Man is gay...

    by AsimovLives

    ... they will have a point.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:25 a.m. CST

    smack_teddy

    by AsimovLives

    About Jar Jar Abrams's FAGGOT TREK, i'm both being serious and joking.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:29 a.m. CST

    Of course in the final film the costume will look differently

    by AsimovLives

    After colour correction and all that, the suit will look very differently. This is nothing new, it even harks back to when the movies were shot in black and white. It's not the colour of the suit in those photos that worries me, if you know what i mean.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:38 a.m. CST

    I have no idea how the final film will turn out, but...

    by Orbots Commander

    ...man, that costume just looks all kinds of awful, even when discounting the black crotch and the silver sneakers. What's with the spilled blue paint look on the gloves as well? The whole thing looks like an over designed mess. The shitty looking costume is one major fuck-up of the production so far. They can't fix THAT in post.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 9:59 a.m. CST

    99% of this board MUST be in the closet!

    by benmears

    Why else their obvious obsession with gay sex? If they're THAT interested in it, then they must want it, right? Which is cool with me. To each their own. But, with such strong homosexual feelings they might want to cut it out with all the hateful, ignorant "faggot" comments & the gay=bad connotations etc.. It's juvenile, offensive & a huge indicator of being extremely simple-minded.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 10:27 a.m. CST

    Reply to betaraybill07

    by jwardlow

    **betaraybill07 must be rolling over in his grave.** Even though he's not dead... yeah, looks bad enough.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 10:28 a.m. CST

    I agree with the haters

    by atalcot

    This costume change sucks. It honestly looks like the designer used the 1970s TV show as the basis for this outfit. I would have preferred if the costume had looked more like it was pieced together and modified from things bought over the internet, but this does not look like something a teenager could scrap together. I think the basic rule with superhero movie costumes is to either follow the original design as close as possible, or make it more functional and realistic .

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 10:45 a.m. CST

    Borat wore that suit first

    by Jaster

    http://www.swimoutlet.com/photos/7543-2T.jpg

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 11:02 a.m. CST

    what he's doing to the guy's face?

    by bayridgeindahouse

    .... about to tangle him in a sticky web of Spider Jizz!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 11:08 a.m. CST

    dr_pepperspray

    by AsimovLives

    I have to agree with you in that i did missed the witticism and snarks from Spidey in the Raimi movies. The nly occasion i remmber in Raimi's first spidey movie where he says soemthing to the effect that resembled Spidey's trademark snarks was when the Green Goblin invaded JJJ's office, and Spidey showed up, JJJ says soemthing silly and spidey shuts him up with a webshot and says "Shut up, mommy and daddy are talking". That really sounded like soemthing spidey would say. Besdies that, the traditional spidey Snark was absent. As for the drama, well, form what i know, Spider-Man was deliberatly creeated as a character to whom life didn't give him easy breaks, Stan Lee evne said that Peter Parker's life was deliberatly made as an soap-opera, where his personal problems would be as troublesome as the super-villain of the week. So, tragedy and angst were always part of Peter Parker/Spider-Man's character. The difference between the comics and the movie is that in the comics he has his sarcastic sense of humour to help him go through, while that was considerably toned down almost to the point of not beign there in the Raimi movies. Like you and many others, i did missed the snarks from Spidey. But there is not to say those will not be in the new reboot. I mean, the movie is being directed by a guy who made a cynical romantic comedy full of snarks and bites. And if you have seen THE SOCIAL NETWORK, Andrew Garfield is quite apt at delivering deadpan and snark humour. I think the guy is very well chosen for the role. And as for angst teen tragedy, well, remember, the character was DELIBERATLY created that way. Just because a movie has a teen agnsty character as the lead doens't automaticalçly make it bad. TWILIGHT is just a bad example of that. A good writer/filmmaker can make good of it. Beside,s teenhood IS ANGST. you forgot how it was already? Not that i would blame you for that, i also deliberatly try to forget my teenhood too, i fucking hated that era of my life, adolescence sucks! Adolescence is the age of retardness.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 11:19 a.m. CST

    Industrykiller what official promo shot?

    by Monolith_Jones

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 11:20 a.m. CST

    orbots commander

    by AsimovLives

    Maybe that suit is just his first suit, and he's trying to get them right by trial and error, perhaps? If there was one thing that i do criticise about Sam Raimi's first Spider-Man movie is that they got to the final spider-man suit way too quickly. I would had liked to see him more with his "wrestling suit" and with some other intermediary experiemental suits until he finally gets it right with the official dayjob suit. One thing that always made me wonder about the version of the organic webs of Spider-Man is: why doesn't he uses his own web silk to make his suit? Imagine how strong and though a cloth made of such type of web silk would be. Because, in real life, spider's web silk is the thoughest thing in nature compared to their size, weight and thickness. It's known that comparative to it's weight and thickness, spider silk is proportionally stronger them steel and half the tensil strengh of kevlar. One type of spider, the Darwin's bark spider, produces a web silk that is proportionally 10 times stronger then kevlar! Imagine that transposed to the proportions of an human, Spider-Man's web silk would make his suit stronger and thougher then chainmal and kevlar many times over. His suit would literally be bullet, impact and fire proof to all but a few cases. Why has that never been brough up in comics and movies is a mystery to me.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 11:22 a.m. CST

    benmears

    by AsimovLives

    Because when you watch that photo above it nevr comes to your mind the obvious gay joke? You must be a very repressed individual. I even sense a sort of panic in your coments. I'm not sure if your closet coment should be aplied to others, you know? Your post might just backfire on you spectaculary.

  • You want to see me really angry? Kill a spider in my presence, it's my berserk button. While i dislike animal cruelty, i'm not softie about animals getting killed, specially if they are cattle or accepted hunting targets. But kill a spider in my presence and i turn to an hulk. I have a profound respect and admiration for spiders. they are amazing animals. and recently, they have ben extensively studied due to the fantastic nature of their webs, which have properties that makes them the holy grail of fabric technology. Besides, spiders cool! I'm dead tired of seeing them as portait as villains in movies just because of their looks. Makes me want to root for the giant spider whenever a designated hero has to fight and kill one to show his hero status. Fucking spider killers!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 11:52 a.m. CST

    "Suck my Spider-Cock! Suck it! Mmmmmm..."

    by MrMysteryGuest

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 11:53 a.m. CST

    This is what happens when Spidey uses too much of the Shake Weight!

    by MrMysteryGuest

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 1:03 p.m. CST

    Spider-Man is just going with the times

    by AsimovLives

    And the times today is to go bi by way, i guess.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 1:17 p.m. CST

    benmears

    by cylon_conspiracy

    So, that image doesn't look like Spider-Man getting a blow-job from a dude? You don't think it's funny? You can't just laugh at a funny picture, but instead you have to go on a diatribe against how laughing at funny pictures makes someone gay. I don't know what it's like to be in the closet, but you seem to be the expert on it.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 1:46 p.m. CST

    compared to tobey maguire's suit

    by cylon_conspiracy

    This one looks more functional... the material on the new one looks like it serves as armor. Maybe knife/bullet proof? Maguire's suit just looks like pajamas in comparison. Just for my info, does anyone know how many Spider-Man suits they used for the first two films? Surely they have more detailed costumes for close-ups, and more rough costumes that can be messed up in an action sequence?

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:03 p.m. CST

    floatingholmes, effeminate?? And monolith, promo shot

    by IndustryKiller!

    Oh jesus christ, Im not even going to respond to this homophobic horseshit that the suit is somehow more "gay" than other spider man suits. If you don't like some of the aesthetic touches, that's fair enough and I won't fault you, but there was not NEARLY this much complaining when the released the first official, color corrected shot of Garfield in the costume. Not even close to this much bitching. And again, if you somehow think a stunt rehearsal is indicative of ANYTHING in this film you're wrong, not just a differing of opinion, but flat out fucking wrong. You, nor I, nor anyone else can tell a thing from a stunt rehearsal other than the simple fact that Spider Man will be tossing a guy with his legs, and something tells me you don't have a problem with that basic concept, which is by any estimation kinda cool. And monolith here's the promo shot of Garfield in the costume, juxtaposed with Macguire in costume http://www.fashionfame.com/2011/01/andrew-garfield-spider-man-look/

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:10 p.m. CST

    Ok here it is, Garfield next to Macguire, both in costume

    by IndustryKiller!

    http://www.fashionfame.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/andrew-garfield-and-tobey-maguire-as-spiderman.jpeg From now on you don't get to gripe about a bunch of spy shots, you have to compare the way it will actually look in the film to the way it actually looks on film in the original. No more cherry picking. You cannot tell me that somehow Macguire looks somehow objectively better than Garfield. Especially given that Garfields frame is MUCH closer to that of the comic than Macguire's more squat frame.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:25 p.m. CST

    To industrykiller

    by tbdeinc

    They changed the design of the suit. Macguire costume's design was not changed. THAT is the difference.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:38 p.m. CST

    Industrykiller! These shots show the costume better...

    by FloatingHolmes

    That's why there's more complaining. You can't fix that awful suit in post. And as to it being effeminate: replacing the clean lines of the original costume with these flares and stripes and dark splotches on the crotch, while removing the belt so the entire red frontal design looks like a big arrow pointing down at the darkened crotch sure as hell is not a sexually-neutral change. It's not homophobic to infer something odd going on there. They're putting all that emphasis on the stuntman's crotch (before color-correcting it, if you please) for SOME reason. If you know what it is, let us in on it.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:45 p.m. CST

    Again, I refer you all the the shot I posted of the promo shot

    by IndustryKiller!

    This does not "show the costume better". Except for the feet there is nothing here that you couldnt see in the original shot. Nothing "gay" about it. I again defer you to that, since that's how the fucking thing looks.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 2:52 p.m. CST

    It's about design that people hate. NOT LOOKS.

    by tbdeinc

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 3:09 p.m. CST

    o god

    by Ashley Kudler

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 3:18 p.m. CST

    Same damn thing tbdeinc

    by IndustryKiller!

    Its the LOOK of the design. And since the complaints here have been largely about color and "gayness", I think we have our argument defined. As far as the color and the codpiece, those issues are worked out by the promo shot and the fact that you're a complete moron if you think the cod piece will be showing through the fabric int eh actual film. Like handicapped level IQ stupid if you really think the filmmakers would allow that. As for the "gayness', which again I think has a lot more to do with the color than anything else, well that says a lot more about the person leveling the charge than it does about the design. Sounds like some of the homophobic nerds in this talkback have some soul searching to do.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 3:45 p.m. CST

    Wow, Spidey can shoot webbing outa *there* too??

    by FeralAngel

    Bet he's hell on urinals, heh.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:14 p.m. CST

    dr_pepperspray

    by AsimovLives

    I know that the Green Goblin is a popular enemy of Spidey. But personally, i never liked him much. You comented on the absense of Green Goblin in the new movie. Which makes me suspicious that in this movie, Gwen Tracy will not get killed and will reurn for the second movie. Remember how in Raimi's Spiderman movies it was Mary Jane Watson who was Peter Parker's love right from the start, right from the high school years. Hell, they were even neighbours who knew each other for years already, maybe even since ever. I suspect that in this new reboot, it's Gwen Stacy that will be Spiderman's eternal paramour. They are doing a reverse of Raimi's movies, i suspect. You nkow waht i mean? In Raimi's first Spidey movie, Mary Jane didn't got killed by the Green Goblin when put in a similiar predictment of Gwen. I ssupect that at least in the first spiderman reboot movie, Gwen will survive and continue in the second movie, and maybe even more. I do hope for the return of Spidey's repartee and quips, so famous in the comics. You said it all about the motivation and why Spidey's humour is so important as part of his character. I ssupect that his superpowers have Peter Parker a smart-alec personality that is common in empowered people. That he uses to make light of his life problems, or to irritate his enemies into making them brek their concentration is one of the thing i always loved about Spidey. His quipping was legenday, and i wish to see it in the movies. As for your suspicion that Andrew Garfield mightpull it off due to his way of speaking as you know it, well, remember, he's an actor, it's his job to imporsonate peoplewho are different them himself. Actros do that all the time. Actors do that to their typecasted characvters even. Rarely actors play exact copies of themselves onscreen. Clint Eastwood and Charles Bronson were not a rigth winger near-viligant in real life. Eli Wallach is not mexican. Sly Stallone is not a badass vietnam veteran warrior. actors can change how they act and talk for the demands of a role. It's their job to impersonate people that they aren't. And i know that Garfeild is quite good at comedy, even understated comedy, as seen in THE SOCIAL NETWORK. And he had a very close Peter Parker snark moment in that scene when he discovers he was cast out of the Facebook's board. When he almost punches Timberlak, and the later flinches like a girl, garfuield snarked "What i love about being with you, Sean, is that you make me look like a badass in comparison". That's a very Spider-Man snark moment, the type of deadpan humour that's spiderman's trademark. Me, i think the guy will delivers. It's not him which will make me skeptical about the movie. Funny enough, it's not even the director that might make me skeptical of this movie. Many have comented that the director never made a big budget movie like this before. Well, neither did Chritopher Nolan when he made his first Batman movie, and that turned out OK (understatment for effect).

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:35 p.m. CST

    Well, this certainly bodes well...

    by BurnHollywood

    The producers didn't even catch on to the fact that they okayed the gayest superhero costume in cinema history. Or that they cast a redhead to play a blonde. That only leaves about a million other things that could be horrifically wrong.<br> Keep 'em coming. Haven't laughed this hard in ages.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:51 p.m. CST

    VIDEO

    by MST3KPIMP

    http://www.iltalehti.fi/nettitv/?30385561 heres video if the scene the above pics show. not too shabby.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:54 p.m. CST

    That costume looks like something too shameful to use in gay bear porn

    by Wilford_Brimleys_Diabetes_Rage

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:56 p.m. CST

    SKULLFUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    by crackerfarmboy

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 4:57 p.m. CST

    That costume looks like something too shameful to use in gay bear porn

    by Wilford_Brimleys_Diabetes_Rage

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 5:07 p.m. CST

    good video mst3kpimp

    by cylon_conspiracy

    looks better in context.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 5:17 p.m. CST

    Spiderbutch takes Minneapolis

    by vettebro

    (Gayest city in America) look it up. These pics and that costume remind me of this website. GAY!!!

  • The "gay" jokes and color and cod piece has nothing to do with the design of the costume... As I said before, you get 10 different artists to draw spider-man... You'll get 10 different illustrations/styles... But the design of the costume will be the same... It won't have a stripe going down the side, or gloves with red on one side and blue on another... Etc... What you are conflicted with is window dressing... Like the embossed "S" in superman returns, or the color, or the embossed webbing in The previous movies... All of that is not relevant to the design. That's artistic style.

  • Maybe this is an intermediary suit, an experiment, a trial and error thing before spidey gets to his final spider-suit. We don't know. We know nothing about it. i think it would rather be wiser if we don't jump to conclusions still this early. We just do not know.

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:15 p.m. CST

    Spiderman's Amazing Ass

    by Bruce_the_Shark

    The costume's awesome and the new Spidey's got a fantastic body -- and an awesome ass -- oh so sexy. Not every superhero has to be totally jacked. Peter Parker is still a kid in this movie. Many more production shots here: http://www.fmforums.co.uk/forums/lofiversion/index.php?t135670.html Raimi's movies are so overrated Maguire was an utter bore. And Maguire's suit was really fake looking. They tried too hard, made it too perfect looking with the muscle padding and shadings and the worse was the fake skin-tone muscle they added on the "torn" suit. And the silvery reflecting webbing was annoying, not to mention the fact that Spiderman was nearly entirely CGI -- especially when swinging and leaping. I'm so glad to see they're doing real stunt work for this movie. Watching Raimi's movies is like watching video game animation.

  • Wow! I mean, really, what we have this movie to compare with to get such extreme reactions? What we really got? 500 DAYS OF SUMMER? How can that even compare?

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 6:32 p.m. CST

    bruce_the_shark,. that link you gave us...

    by AsimovLives

    ... man, that photos of Spidey seated on that car's bonet with his legs spreaded up and the guy talled up inbetween crotch at the height of spidey's ass.... now the gay jokes will really come fast and furious! Oh boy! It will not be pretty! It will not be pretty! Oh boy!

  • Feb. 5, 2011, 8:50 p.m. CST

    Very Sexy, looking forward to this

    by Mag

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 1:20 a.m. CST

    SithMenace

    by eveelcapitalist

    "if they ever rebooted Psycho. " Not familiar with the remake with Vince Vaughn? Oh yes, they remade it with Vince Vaughn. Directed by Gus Van Zant. Shot for shot, man, shot for shot.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 2:48 a.m. CST

    Promo shot has no mas, no feet, no line down leg, no back, etc.

    by FloatingHolmes

    Industrykiller, what the hell are you talking about? All these photos of the suit expose that it is a total loss. There is not one cool/right thing about it. Fix that with "color correction". Moron.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 4:18 a.m. CST

    They seriously need to rethink this shit.

    by Eli_Cash

    It isn't too late, but if they release this film with this costume, there's about zero chance of me seeing it in theatres. And I'm not over-reacting. I don't have much investment in the spider-man mythos. But this costume is crap. Some people will probly try to defend the film when it comes out. "yeah, the costume looks stupid, but it's well written, well acted, etc." Fine, I'll plan to watch it on DVD then. But the only reason to see a movie in theatres is the visual experience. I want to see something that looks either cool or at least realistic. This is neither. Realistic would be a cheap looking spandex suit that a real highschool student might be able to afford. Cool is something like in the first 3 movies. THis costume looks just as expensive as the previous one, with an added layer of stupid. And it's pretty obvious that the most glaringly stupid element isn't something that'll be fixed in post. The inexplicable black crotch is in the official photo. I suggest that people who don't like the suit, do what I'm doing. Lets make this a theatre boycott. Wait for the dvd cuz they sure ain't justifying the cost of seeing this on the big screen. Don't care how witty it is, or even if its true to the comics. It looks like crap, so why would I want to see it on a huge screen, in 3d no less?

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 6:05 a.m. CST

    The suit looks shit.

    by DrX

    I guess it had to change to justify the Director's vision and the suit designer's salary.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 6:33 a.m. CST

    To the supposed 'tech' guys on here..

    by jack Bauer

    Since this isn't a CGI costume uunlike Green Lantern then the correction work will be painfully limited, you don't create a costume that will need a shed load of cgi fixing that's eating a huge hole out of the budget. The normal route is to have an actor / stuntman in costume and a fully cgi creation for some of the more unworkable shots BUT there has to be continuity throughout. What you are seeing roughly is what you will get, the strange zipper type markings are part of the costume since they are in places that cannot be hidden (normally along the seams). All you are going to get is maybe a colour correction (I bloody hope so) and some wire removal. I have this awful feeling that the feet are going to stay although I do hope they remove them as stuntman only items. The black crotch could be a part of the wire rig coming throun the costume but again I have to say you see it on the British actor as well in non wire shots...oh dear.... What I think people just refusing to acknowledge about the costume is the design, what you see is not going to change any if at all and the fans see its a complete bastardisation of the classic spidey costume. This is spidey does BH 90210.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 6:39 a.m. CST

    Get a life people

    by Bruce_the_Shark

    Why don't all you cry babies wait the year and a half until the movie comes out before you tear it apart. It's a work in progress for crying out loud and your basing your rage on a few amateur photos during a night shoot. I remember the same outcry back when Christian Bale first appeared in his goofy Batman suit and everyone when batshit crazy, saying it looked like crap. And it did look goofy in those first images. But the film turned out OK and folks forgot all the initial hubbub. I can't believe how obsessed people have become with Spidey's darkened crotch area. (OK, I've become similarly obsessed with his ass, but that's another story.) The suit has shaded areas, including the crotch region. Guaranteed you won't even notice it in the film. You probably won't notice the silvery foot lining either. But we'll see. I for one am excited and am sure Webb's film will be much more enjoyable than Raimi's forgettable tripe. In the end, the film's success will reflect the story, characterizations and acting, not the fucking suit.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 9:09 a.m. CST

    Why so surprised by the slippers?

    by dmwalker

    They did say it was a reboot.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 9:33 a.m. CST

    Geez.......

    by LLcruize2

    Instrustrykiller's comparison link shows just how subjective and speculative you people screaming the sky is falling are. The suit on Garfield, in a proper photo, looks damn good. Just as good as the one featured in the first three films. All the homophobe comments kills me when the suit is no more tight or "gay" looking than the suit ever has looked. And yes the finished film will be color timed and enhanced and the suit will look a lot different than what you are seeing in these shots. Has anyone here seen the suit from the first three films in person? Watch the making of features found on the DVD's/Blu-ray's. What you see there and what is in the finished film differ in appearance.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 9:46 a.m. CST

    ATTENTION: asimovlives & cylon_conspiracy...

    by benmears

    Yep, you both got me. Aren't you proud of yourselves? Indeed, because I happen to find all the endless, juvenile gay sex jokes to be redundant & boring while searching through this thread for any comments of actual interest, it's a clear indicator that I'm the one in the closet. Yeah, right. Now THAT makes sense... Maybe I'm gay. Maybe I'm not. But, if I were, I can assure you that I'm not hiding in a closet somewhere behind a sheild of homophobic humor & obsessing about "dick", "fag" & "skull-fucking" jokes. None of which I even find offensive, truth be told, they're just plain DUMB. The sort of shit that most people outgrow in middle school for Pete's sake.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 10:43 a.m. CST

    benmears

    by AsimovLives

    I fear to live in a world where it would be governed by your vision of PC decency. What a fucking stagnated, represive world it would be. PC fascism. If you can't handle a gay joke, get out to where you can't hear and read them. Save yourselve the indignation. By the why, you know what kind of people constantly make gay jokes and teach each other those? THE GAYS! They have a sense of humour about themselves. Learn to have one too. PC is bullshit shit for repressed idiots.

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 1:51 p.m. CST

    We don't need this...

    by toxictodd

    Rehashing of the same old shit...do we really need reboots of Spiderman or Superman? Come on Hollywood, how about something new?

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 2:47 p.m. CST

    asimovlives: intermediate suit

    by FastEddie8139

    I bet he contemplates changing the costume while trying to answer the age-old question: "Why Do All These Homosexuals Keep Sucking My Cock?" http://www.theonion.com/articles/why-do-all-these-homosexuals-keep-sucking-my-cock,10861/

  • Feb. 6, 2011, 2:52 p.m. CST

    Right on Asimovlives...

    by vettebro

    Fuck this politically correct world. Anyone remember "freedom"? It should apply to everyone. Including opinions you don't agree with. That suit and those pics look GAY!

  • Feb. 7, 2011, 10:41 a.m. CST

    So there will be clones in this one?

    by rahtard

  • Feb. 7, 2011, 10:42 a.m. CST

    Ooops

    by rahtard

    Here. Someone get cracking on this, as it seems AICN has been outscooped by the indy site MTV.com. http://splashpage.mtv.com/2011/02/04/spider-man-reboot-set-photos/

  • Feb. 8, 2011, 3:20 a.m. CST

    oh boo who you pair of fucking reformed Bernard Mannings

    by Smack_Teddy

    vettebro & asimov, suck my cock, let me jizz over your ugly cuntish mother, then fuck off.