Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

UPDATE (Now With More Pics)!! See Yesterday's X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Reveal In Higher Res!!

 

UPDATE:  L.A. Times' Hero Complex has three more stills from the film, along with some words from director Matthew Vaughn ("...I will say the following: X-Men as a brand is bigger than Captain America, Thor and the Green Lantern, all put together.”)

All can be found HERE.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Merrick here...

Straight to the point with this one. 

Higher-res (and official) versions of the X-MEN: FIRST CLASS character image we saw yesterday have gone online over at MSN.  You can find them, for better or worse, HERE.  Slightly ensmallened variants appear below.  

 

 

 

So...yeeeeeaaaaaahhhhh. There you go.  

 

— follow Merrick on Twitter ! — 

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:48 p.m. CST

    Good god

    by damned-dirty-ape

    AICN are actually keeping up with everyone else today. Good job

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:50 p.m. CST

    Good Lord January Jones is hot

    by SpawnofAchilles

    I have hope for this because of Vaugn well, let's wait and see. Joblo has some pics other pics taken from the film that look pretty cool. K Bacon is in one.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:53 p.m. CST

    What's the deal with the lighting?

    by heyscot

    weird picture

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:55 p.m. CST

    heyscot

    by adml_shake

    Keep in mind this was a leaked photo. I would imagine it's supposed to have more going on in the back ground where you wouldn't notice how darkly lit they are.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:56 p.m. CST

    my goodness my guinness does that suck

    by stu_pickles

    looks like someone with photoshop and imdb pictures could've done a better job

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:58 p.m. CST

    They look like slightly better than average cosplayers

    by Prof. Pop-Cult

    I don't know how I feel about this for the time being.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:59 p.m. CST

    nope, still sucks...

    by Billy_D_Williams

    sure this isn't meant for the syfy channel?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:59 p.m. CST

    Jesus Christo!! WTF is this studio douchery??

    by AmazinSpidey82

    First of all, who the fuck is the guy with the red face?? And why is Beast blue? I could've sworn originally he looked like a human until his genetic mutation fully kicked in?? The chick in the middle of the 2nd pic and January Jones (total porn star name lol) can both get it loooong and stiff lol. I'll even wear that dorky yellow jumpsuit they all have on hahaha. Oh and uhhh...these mutants look pretty old for a 60's period tale...should we assume by the time x-men occurs most of them are dead or haven't aged besides Magneto and Xavier?? This smells like a flop but I'll wait to see some actual footage before sending 20th Century Fox any hate mail. Oh yeah, peep my blog @ http://kungfutreachery.blogspot.com thanks!!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:59 p.m. CST

    Awww, shit...

    by flclhack

    It's an official image? Not a bad photoshop?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7 p.m. CST

    Amateur Photography

    by D o o d

    Come on studios, have some common sense and hire a proper photographer!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:01 p.m. CST

    Is it wrong

    by damned-dirty-ape

    If i want to bump ugly with the blue one?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:04 p.m. CST

    Need a picture of a mutant w/ the special ability...

    by lochkray

    To beat a dead horse with psychic powers. I try not to be overly skeptical or negative, but I think they've gone the wrong direction with X-Men. Two great movies, one good one (I know I'm in the minority, but I just didn't hate X3. I thought it was entertaining) and a complete misstep on the first "origins" movie despite the best efforts on everybody's part. If you wanted to move forwards, should have gone with an X4 with somebody like Singer at the helm again (Ratner is a fine journeymn director, but no master) There was more than enough fodder at the end of the third one to continue the series in an interesting way. Now, we're just...well...beating a dead horse.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:04 p.m. CST

    Michael Fassbender IS Michael Biehn

    by MaxCalifornia.

    Good to see everyone is wearing their seat belts. Even though they're not in a car.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:04 p.m. CST

    X-MEN SEARS FAMILY PORTRAIT

    by Mullah Omar

    This shit is strictly Halloween-season shopping mall photo-booth. For the sake of this film, I hope this represents the cobbled-together hack job by some studio gopher who ripped it off, and not someone's paid professional effort.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:04 p.m. CST

    adml_shake

    by Merrick

    The MSN version is official.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:05 p.m. CST

    What a pile of SHIT

    by doom master

    X Men for the LOSS.... Fuck them. Bring on Avengers...

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:05 p.m. CST

    They stuck Beast at the back

    by MaxCalifornia.

    Because he looks hilarious.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:05 p.m. CST

    Looks like it was produced at Walmart

    by disfigurehead

    Shitty.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:06 p.m. CST

    Forget January Jones...

    by TenderBranson

    Rose Byrne. I bet she shits Godiva.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:07 p.m. CST

    WOW!

    by Dead_Geek

    This looked better when the pics were smaller. This is going to suck so bad. ha!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:07 p.m. CST

    Looks like it's from a halloween costume magazine

    by sweeneydave

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:07 p.m. CST

    Oh and another thing...

    by AmazinSpidey82

    Which chimp at Fox can't properly photoshop?? I've seen fake celeb nudes more convincing than this shit lol. Those other three pictures still look like complete shit, although Kevin Bacon never disappoints...excluding Hollow Man. "...I will say the following: X-Men as a brand is bigger than Captain America, Thor and the Green Lantern, all put together", is a horrible quote. To say something that audacious is a nail in your own movie's coffin and they haven't even wrapped production LOL.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:11 p.m. CST

    What's this red guy's name again? Azrael? Azizyil?

    by Triple_J_72

    And where's Cyclops? WTF

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:11 p.m. CST

    RUBBER The Movie

    by tiggr009

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joI-uU86NXw This is what AICN should be reporting on.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:11 p.m. CST

    STILL SHOOTING for a June release?

    by MaxCalifornia.

    Can you say RUSHED POST PRODUCTION and 89 MINUTE RUNTIME?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:14 p.m. CST

    BEAST = COWARDLY LION

    by Mullah Omar

    That goofy sneer is fucking hilarious. So is the cheap lighting straight out of a Canadian TV show. I wish Fox could see how much I keep laughing at those stills!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:22 p.m. CST

    Bwhahahahahahaha. Why is X-men so DOOOmed in film.

    by the Green Gargantua

    Its so sad. And yes, all of the other X movies were also RETARDED.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:22 p.m. CST

    mesh costumes made by house of peter parker.

    by vulturess

    thought mccoy was gonna be human beast in this.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:26 p.m. CST

    The X-men were my favorite super-heroes growing up...

    by Toruk_Makto

    when I see what has become of them, I.. I..**breaks down weeping**

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:30 p.m. CST

    MY EYES

    by bloodawn5

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:31 p.m. CST

    Hate the pic above....

    by grendel69

    but like the stills. I do wish Shaws appearance was a bit more recognizable. He doesnt have to be wearing the colonial garb - but I would have liked the larger forehead and a ponytail. And Rose, please, for the love of dog, eat some food. Damn, she used to be so cute.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:34 p.m. CST

    MY EYES!!! MY EYES!!! MY FUCKING EYES!!!!

    by bloodawn5

    What the fuck is wron with this: Azazel, Beast and Mistique make up looks terrible, like some kind of lame halloween apliances. Frost looks like a Pornstar with no acting skills, well maybe except pornstar skills. And Magneto and X avier look terrible like villains from an LL COOL J movie. Someone really fucked up big time. Im not trolling Im just sayind the sad truth...

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:37 p.m. CST

    X-men 3: The Last Stand

    by Dead_Geek

    Looked better then this crap. There. I said it.

  • this feels/looks like it could be decent. First off, it's the original 1960's x-men (time period/look)-which is very cool. Second it's Matthew Vaughn, and he's a good director.And well, let's wait till we see a trailer..and then we can opinionate on it.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:51 p.m. CST

    Really just feels wrong

    by Drath

    Why are they not cleaning up the shitstorm mistake that was X3 by bringing back all the characters prematurely killed off? If they intend to reboot, why waste our time with this? McAvoy does NOT convince me that he'll turn into Patrick Stewart ever, let alone in the five years that this must be set before the first movie in order for Havok to be that old. Oh who cares, this series was brilliant for X2 and then got tarnished forever. Best thing I can say for this is the absence of Wolverine.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:55 p.m. CST

    Beast looks more like Nightcrawler in that pic...

    by Simpsonian

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:55 p.m. CST

    Looks cheesey, but I trust Matthew Vaughn.

    by SirGaryColeman

    Kick-Ass was a classic and one of the top 3 super hero based films of all time. I will reserve judgement.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:55 p.m. CST

    I sleep with January Jones. On the reg!

    by AzulTool

    Now, if only I can get her to have sex with me.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:57 p.m. CST

    Totally love it, and don't know why

    by AshMcQ

    There is just something very uniqe about the tone of that images. Something almost surrealistic.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:58 p.m. CST

    it's scary how much fassbender looks like a young ian mackellon

    by Redhead_Redemption

    I never could figure out why he was cast, but damn does he look like a young magneto

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:08 p.m. CST

    XXX-Men: First Stand

    by veteran_of_mu

    Yeah, I don't want to watch porn any more now I've got this to toss off to. As for the kid playing Xavier - are we certain that's who he's supposed to be playing? Because he looks an awful lot more like Banshee, don't you think?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:10 p.m. CST

    The thing about Rose Byrne is..

    by BBSloth

    I saw her naked in a play before she was famous. You heard me.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:16 p.m. CST

    HAVOK's got the concentric circles on his chest!

    by 3D-Man

    Color me excited!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:17 p.m. CST

    They need to show a bad-ass trailer soon, or this will be mocked to death.

    by Stereotypical Evil Archer

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:20 p.m. CST

    This movie feels "British"

    by Dhaemon

    Like something you would see on the BBC

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:23 p.m. CST

    So disappointing.

    by moonlightdrive

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:23 p.m. CST

    It's unsettling...

    by HyphenatedWords

    ...when a reboot uses features that were created specifically for its predecessor and not in the source material? Gives me the creeps. It was one of the aspects of Superman Returns that crawled under my skin. The opening credits fooled me with nostalgia, then the rest of the movie was a pale letdown that constantly reminded us of the better version. Fail. <br> <br> The case in point here is: Is this all they can do with Mystique? Why go with the weird scaly face and odd, plastered red hair? Instead of creating the character full-cloth, we're getting a Rebecca Romijn version knockoff. Mystique in the comic was bold, in control, a leader. I'd love to see her sometime. Beast looks like a Kelsey Grammer knockoff.<br> <br> Other than those two, I do like what I see.<br> <br> There a full-on talkbalk response from me, just minutes after I decried talkbakers in another port. Heh. It's not just cricy. It's hypocrisy. :P

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:26 p.m. CST

    Looks like a TV series

    by catlettuce4

    I'd love to see X-Men handled really well for a change. I've always thought maybe Cameron could have done it right, but that isn't going to happen. The saddest part is that this film is their chance to do it right and fix any mistakes that were made, but it looks like they're probably not going to do that. Always difficult to tell from pictures alone, but there's something not right about this. No Scott or Jean by the way? That seems so wrong.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:28 p.m. CST

    If it's supposed to be the 60's...

    by roninredshade

    ...how come all the youngster guys have 2010 D-Bag Twi-hard Hairdo's? (In the Hero Comlex images) I was looking forward to the movie until I saw that and am a little taken aback....

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:31 p.m. CST

    Apparently this Azizazul guy is Nightcrawler's dad?

    by Triple_J_72

    So is there a sex scene featuring a red guy with leprosy and a chubby teenage Mystique? eyewwww...

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:33 p.m. CST

    X-Men as a brand...

    by FloatingHolmes

    will soon be as valueless as "Wonderbread" if they keep making movies like these. Has M. V. ever heard of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby? They did a series called "X-Men" too. Someday someone should make movies about those guys because M.V.'s X-Men look like douche bags.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:33 p.m. CST

    I think I just threw up in my mouth a little

    by groorgman

    God damnit....is it too much to ask for an Xmen movie with sentinels in it with out wondering what happens to frogs when they're hit by lightning? Jeeeeezus.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:34 p.m. CST

    I hate this pic but the other 3 at that other site look good!

    by The Founder

    Still is pissed about continuity with Emma being thrust into the 60's as well as Havok, but Jones and Bacon look good as Shaw and Frost.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:35 p.m. CST

    No wonder they took so long to reveal the look...

    by jazzylg

    The costumes are garish, and very simple. I know this is a 60's period piece but.. this is bland, I'll suspend my judgment until I see a trailer.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:35 p.m. CST

    The official shot here is bad, but the LA Times pics...

    by Lone Fox

    They look really good. Hank McCoy in the first picture looks straight out of Kirby's X-Men.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:35 p.m. CST

    The official shot here is bad, but the LA Times pics...

    by Lone Fox

    They look really good. Hank McCoy in the first picture looks straight out of Kirby's X-Men.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:37 p.m. CST

    Fassbender looks good in all the pics

    by The Founder

    This man is probably gonna own as Mags.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:43 p.m. CST

    Guess it is real.

    by Yelsaeb

    It'll work. Can't even tell that's Crazy Larry under all that Azazel make up.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:43 p.m. CST

    This looks more like the real X-men.

    by Orionsangels

    Unlike the lame movies

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:47 p.m. CST

    RETARDED!!!

    by Delagoya

    Do they even know what the hell they are doing??? As an X-men fan, they seriously destroyed my affinity for this genere! As far as MV's qoute, Maybe at one point that statement was true, but the way the Xmen movies have turned out, clearly it's all crap-out-of-mouth talk!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:53 p.m. CST

    Magneto is Gaius Baltar!?

    by jaymrobinson

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:58 p.m. CST

    Witholding judgement

    by Spyhunter

    Until I can see this in the context of the film.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:02 p.m. CST

    Vaughn Is Right

    by Barron34

    X-Men IS potentially a bigger property than those other characters he mentioned, but X-Men will not realize that potential by deviating from the canon of the comics like this film obviously does. ****They have gone to the trouble of re-booting the franchise, and they waste the opportunity to use the classic original X-Men line-up as a starting point.***** Instead, they create weird characters whole cloth, completely screw up the time line of other characters , and exclude other key characters (Cyclops, Jean Grey, the original Angel, Ice Man, the original, non-furry Beast). This movie is a mess from the perspective of fans of the comic books (I grew up on the Claremont/John Byrne run, and read back issues of the older, "classic" X-Men). *****Setting the story in the 60s is an interesting idea, but wastes the chance to start the re-boot with the Classic X-Men line-up, leaving open later possibilities for the more diverse X-Men team of later years.*****I am not interested in seeing this movie, and I dread the waste of Sebastian Shaw and the Hellfire Club, who are great villains that were integral to the Phoenix Saga. There is no coherent reason to place the Hellfire Club in the sixties, in my opinion.******This franchise crashed with X-Men 3, with the perfunctory and poorly handled truncatiuon of the Phoenix Saga. Now that they are re-booting, they have a chance to start from zero, but instead are choosing a bastardized, non-canonical approach which doesn't seem to respect the source material of the comics. Seems like a real waste of potential.******

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:08 p.m. CST

    And starring James Callis as Michael Fassbender...

    by smackfu

    as Magneto.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:10 p.m. CST

    "Bigger then Cap, Thor and GL"

    by matchesmalone2380

    Sounds more like a movie studio going against competition than fact. If Marvel had done this movie in house instead of Fox: That quoute never would have been said, more character could have been involved and the photo would have looked a lot better. An Xavier vs. Magneto movie I could see, but the characters are a poor match. I thought Havok was Cyclops younger brother? Why use the crappy Morrison era "Angel"? And It looks like Mystique is in her teens (granted she's a shape shifter)! I'll wait till netflix for this one!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:23 p.m. CST

    Are those January Jones real boobs?

    by SmokingRobot

    Or are those CGI boobs? My God, they're the size of cantaloupes.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:25 p.m. CST

    Emma Frost:

    by the new transported man

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:26 p.m. CST

    What the f*ck is an Azuzel?

    by fanboy71

    I'm quite certain that the first class consisted of Cyclops, Jean, Iceman, Beast, and Angel. Give me that movie, and I'm there opening day. As it looks now, there is a better chance of me being struck by lightning while turning in my winning powerball ticket than there is of me seeing this in theaters. Although, if the demon that Ratner sold his soul to to get in the movie business is listening, I will gladly see this in the theater if I win the lottery between now and then. without the lightning part. -your humble servant.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:34 p.m. CST

    The Beast

    by dukeroberts

    Hank McCoy was not blue and furry until after he left the X-Men. And that transformation was not caused by a mutation, but rather by a chemical accident. They better make Hank funny, not some bookish dork. Hank, though brilliant, was a cut up. He better be funny.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:35 p.m. CST

    January Jones

    by dukeroberts

    Oh...my....(slobber).......

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:41 p.m. CST

    The first still is better...

    by kitkats99

    Its got Banshee, Magneto, Mystique in human form, Moira McTaggart, Beast before he turned blue, Professor X and Havok, all in normal clothes. Much better than that shitty photoshop job.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:56 p.m. CST

    This looks like some "direct to video" shit.

    by Ironhelix

    Who the fuck is responsible for this getting made?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:57 p.m. CST

    This franchise just won't fucking die

    by IndustryKiller!

    They should have scrapped it and started over after the horrendous X3.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:15 p.m. CST

    No excuse

    by NinjaChampion

    It shouldn't be this hard. The stories and characters are already there. The X-men are my favorite comic and I saw the last one based on loyalty to the franchise. But I'm done. I'll probably wait for the 1.50 theater just out of morbid curiosity or wait for netflix.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:17 p.m. CST

    emo harry potter teen drama buffy twilight

    by HadWoodenTeethChasedMobyDick

    with lame action set to some shit band and computer lazers, slow mo and crying girls and not one black person

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:19 p.m. CST

    shouldn

    by HadWoodenTeethChasedMobyDick

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:19 p.m. CST

    't it take place in the 70's?

    by HadWoodenTeethChasedMobyDick

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:20 p.m. CST

    AAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA

    by pauduro

    After Kick ass i knew Matthew Vaughn did NOT know what the hell he was doing (just Hit si Good) THIS is prof did some one ever read ANY X-man stuff in the production in this future crap??? they sell $3 compendiums in any comic store you know....juts o see WTF is going on in that univers and not MES UP BIGGGG TIME

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:26 p.m. CST

    Why can't this franchise die?

    by InsertWittyUserName

    We know it sucks. It gets suckier with each movie. They've got the ENTIRE story of the origin wrong. WHY IS MYSTIQUE IN AN X-MEN COSTUME?! THIS WILL NOT PLEASE FANS. bryan singer/ schuler donner said they want to regain the trust of the fans. THIS MOVIE is not doing it, forget the image. the whole idea of what this movie is about is insulting to fans. And after reading the interview? Man- seems like Vaughn just wants to finish and wash his hands of this mess to be honest. And I don't blame him. He didn't sound very enthusiastic at all.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:26 p.m. CST

    January Jones Is Pure Perfection

    by NeonFrisbee

    She's the only reason I want to see this movie -- I wanna see Betty Draper in the Emma Frost lingerie. Otherwise, it looks terrible.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:30 p.m. CST

    We see better Photoshop work on deviantart

    by Prof. Pop-Cult

    I don't know which is more depressing: the questionable look of the young X-Men or that someone who isn't as skilled as non-professionals whose work you see on the internet got paid to patch this together.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:34 p.m. CST

    The best we could have hoped for was X4 actually

    by DirtyDingusMegee

    Since they semi-rebooted anyway, heres my two cents. If Fox was wasn't going to through out the whole batch, the best they could have done was to create a climactic ending to it all. X-men 4 had the potential to retcon all of the bullshit of X-men 3. It could have started with Logan as the last X-man (since it was his series of movies to begin with) in the future where not only have all of the humans died, but the mutants are being hunted by the Sentinels (Terminator style). That would allow for Cable, Bishop, Apocalypse and all that other cooky time-travel stuff. Lets face it, a balls-out dark, violent X-men apocalypse movie would be a damn sight better than a soft reboot with shitty characters and bad ideas. But this is all wishful thinking to a time now dead and buried. The fun of the X-men movies is done. Stand a fork in em'. It was always about the cash anyways, but at least we got X2 (which had flaws in its own right but was still the best X-men movie we got). Maybe some day a studio will finance a real X-men movie. Until then I'll keep dreaming.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:36 p.m. CST

    Looks Like X-Men "Maquettes" from SideShow Collectibles!

    by Cheif Brody

    Especially Azazel! That hair looks like a plastic helmet. January Jones's plastic parts look stunning, as usual!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:37 p.m. CST

    Who the hell is Azazel?

    by Darklighter

    I remember reading an olllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllld copy of the X-Men's first issue and I don't know who the fuck Azazel is. Wasn't he the guy who replaced Batman when his back was broken? Or Gargamel's cat? God I hate the X-Men.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:38 p.m. CST

    What did you expect? Yellow spandex?

    by The Reluctant Austinite

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:38 p.m. CST

    Quit Bitching About "Deviating from the Comics"

    by djr

    If you want to read a comic book, read a fucking comic book and boycott the movie, and shake your puffy fists at your basement ceiling in anger. I'm a huge X-Men fan, and I don't need to see the same six or seven characters over and over and over. "Singer ruined the X-Men by deviating from the comics!" Wah Wah Wah! Shake your fists, little weenies. I NEVER want to see Stan Lee's banal dialogue or Ditko's primitive, lantern-jawed cartoons in a modern movie - have you read that shit lately? Does not age well. It's the crude foundation upon which something far more sophisticated was eventually built. This isn't a reboot; it's a prequel set in another "movie" universe. Deal with it or go away. This isn't your favorite issue panel-for-panel on screen; it's a movie based on 40 years of stories and dozens of characters. Deal with it or go away. That being said, these images don't fill me with excitement.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:44 p.m. CST

    when Did Moira become poster worthy

    by Phategod100

    I thought she was nothing more then a talented Dr. and the Financeer. The age i have isues with but I love that bringing the looks of comic without those non-imaginative black leather outfits.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:46 p.m. CST

    launch of a new STAR TREK T.V. series?

    by justmyluck

    That's the vibe I had at first-look. What's with the angora shawl, wig and silicone-suppressing bra on the blond....drag queen?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:48 p.m. CST

    I love the 3 photos

    by Nerd Rage

    Very atmospheric and comic-like. Vaughn is a gifted director. I hope he can do his thing despite the tight schedule.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:01 p.m. CST

    @ amazinspidey82

    by CaptainBass

    You are a douche, sir. You've been pimpin' that shitty site for days now, all the while acting like it was someone else's blog. "Anyone seen this guys blog? Guy is a fuckin' GENIUS" etc. Well know we all know you are just a self publicising dick of the worst kind. So to re-iterate - DOUCHE! As for the X-Men...I'll reserve judgement 'til I at least see a trailer...

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:51 p.m. CST

    My heah looks small next to Christina Hendricks Breast

    by Phategod100

    God, she should be in this movie "for real for real."

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:51 p.m. CST

    I meant Head

    by Phategod100

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:52 p.m. CST

    Is Azazul's hair made out of Coal

    by Phategod100

    he looks like a toy.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, midnight CST

    Dear captainbass,

    by AmazinSpidey82

    I hate to tell you this, but I never pretended my blog belonged to someone else. I just cleverly marketed it, perhaps I can get a job working for 20th Century Fox and help them market this film to the world since the only person waiting for Fandango to release a ticket would be...you? Lameeee. Sincerely, "A Fuckin' Genius" P.S. This movie will mostly suck. You maaaad huh?

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 12:13 a.m. CST

    Smart director, interesting cast + strange 60s setup

    by smudgewhat

    Now = enough odd variables to tweak my interest. I like the new pics. Looks period, quasi-mod, sexy. No expectations = intrigued.

  • But it still might suck thanks to Singer, Rothman, FOX etc.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 1:18 a.m. CST

    Hmmm...

    by dvdhound79

    Great make-up work, likin' the Beast and Mystique work... but what is Sinestro doing here?

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 2:12 a.m. CST

    The whole Havok thing.....

    by TerraRyzing

    from what i remember isn't he or wasn't he?, Scott Summers aka Cyclops ' younger brother? How does that translate into a film set in the 60's.....does Cable aka Cyc and Jean Greys son come back from the future and get some crazy time travelling story arc, just thinking out loud, but seriously? WTF? p.s. i'm kinda actually stoked for this mind you not really knowing some of the characters in this one...theres a pink dude he he he....lol

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 2:49 a.m. CST

    Love the Kevin Bacon pic

    by Grando

    in the updated link. Hellfire Club bitches!

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 4:01 a.m. CST

    by my liege

    Of all the franchise that are being rebooted, X-Men needs it the most, so naturally it's the one they leave alone *facepalm* This is such a fucking missed opportunity it's almost criminal. X-Men. 1960s. Marvel Girl, Beast, Cyclops, Ice-Man and Angel. You'd have EVERYONE creaming their pants over that.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 4:19 a.m. CST

    I'm still up for it. But a terrible official photo!

    by pw

    Who the hell at fox made that? Don't Singer or Vaughn have any say? Because I'll bet you money neither of them said ok to that thing! Give me the pose photos and I'll knock you up one a million times better in half an hour ...and I'm shit at photoshop. I'm shocked. But here's my theory - That was just some bullshit pic knocking around the office that someone leaked. Fox responded by releasing a better rez version instead of putting out a new one. I don't think they wanted to release anything yet apart from the poster Singer gave Harry. I've no problem with the suits, actors or look of the movie. Just this picture. Unbelievable.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 4:35 a.m. CST

    Marvel WANTS the new X-Men and Spider-Man movies to flop badly

    by BrashHulk

    If Sony and Fox finally relinquish rights to Spider-Man and X-Men, respectively, then Marvel can take them back and start making their own versions of the movies. Not that Marvel's versions would be perfect, but they'd probably be much more respectful of canon, at least. The roster of Xavier's team and Magneto's Brotherhood that FOX chose for "X-Men: First Class" is a very sad, unfunny joke. As much as I like some of the actors in the film, I'm hoping it bombs like Hiroshima so FOX drops the X-Men license like a hot potato. The same goes for Fantastic Four, which FOX treated even worse than X-Men. Sony's first two Spider-Man movies were pretty good, actually... and then the third one was just a piece of trash. And even though the franchise is maimed right now, if this reboot makes a big splash (which I suspect it will), expect Sony to ramp the Spider-Man franchise back up to full speed faster than you can say "Rocket Racer."

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 4:51 a.m. CST

    Chubby Chibi Mystique

    by Dennis_Moore

    really gives me a chub for some reason...

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 4:59 a.m. CST

    January Jones...

    by Human Tornado

    ... is hot in a pornstar way.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 5:02 a.m. CST

    Fox needs some damage control!

    by FlandersBum

    Maybe they're hoping the teaser trailer due to be released soon will tide things over. Maybe it looks better in motion. Cause that picture ain't too great.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 5:13 a.m. CST

    Where's the Bacon!?!

    by baronweazle

    I want my Bacon, give me my Bacon!! Bacon rules!!! Looking forward to this though! Still a little weird Matthew Vaughn is doing this after his attempt at X-men 3, but after Kickass I'd trust him with anything.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 5:43 a.m. CST

    The Pink Dude Is Azazel

    by Phategod100

    He's the biological father of Night-crawler. Mystique being his mother of course. Long Story short he's some type of demonic mutant driven to another dimension by Angelic Mutants and can only gain permanent entry back into this dimension by having children blah blah blah.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 5:46 a.m. CST

    Marvel can't integrate anything if they dont have the movie rights

    by Phategod100

    Unfortunately without buying them back as long as Fox gets a X-men related movie in production every 5 years they keep the rights.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 5:56 a.m. CST

    Looks like

    by buggerbugger

    a typical away team from ST:TNG (except for the lingerie model who, I'm guessing, has just wandered in from Picard's latest trip to the Holodeck). I bet the guy with the red skin gets killed first.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 6:34 a.m. CST

    I almost made it

    by HongKongCavalier

    I was SO successful at ignoring this movie that it's not until NOW that I find out that they gave Angel a sex change. and ... and ... that's all I can stands; I can't stands no more! Stop jocking Singer! His versions of X-Men weren't exactly all that great. The bar had been crapfests like Reb Brown's "Captain America" ... so anything would've been a step up. Don't believe me? Go re-watch "Superman Returns" ... I dare ya. After Nolan's Batman, Singer will now have to face a direct comparison. FYI, for those asking "whozzat??" in the pictures: Michael Fassbender (Magneto), Rose Byrne (Moira MacTaggert), January Jones (Emma Frost), Jason Flemyng (Azazel), Nicholas Hoult (Beast), Lucas Till (Havoc), Zoe Kravitz (Angel), Jennifer Lawrence (Mystique) and James McAvoy (Xavier)

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 7:06 a.m. CST

    hongkongcavalier

    by Grando

    It's not that Angel - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_Salvadore

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 7:07 a.m. CST

    baronweazle

    by Grando

    Click the link at the top of the page for some Bacon action.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 9:27 a.m. CST

    isn't this set in the 60s?

    by houbou

    Somehow, the costumes.. the fabrics.. too modern.. January's character, showing is showing more skin than a 60's version would. Well, I don't complain, but if they are trying to do the 60's version, they should really be more realistic.. They should have hired the BBC crew for realism in creating past times environment..

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 9:30 a.m. CST

    Not sure about the photos.

    by Christopher Bynum

    I may need to review the pictures in detail before I decide what I think, especially the January Jones shot. Ideally, I would like to discuss the shot with Jones in person, preferably while we're both naked and I'm showing her a good time.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 9:35 a.m. CST

    StarTrek does not exist in this dojo

    by Cobra--Kai

    scratchmonkey, yes STAR TREK was the first thing that came into my mind when seeing this pic.<p> And not good STAR TREK either... this looks like some DS9 type shit.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 9:35 a.m. CST

    Dig the director, the 60's setting...however

    by MRJONZ72

    As many have said if it does take place in the other 4 movies universes its not making quite sense to me. Also wished they had just rebooted and given us the original 5. I guess well never get a Cyclops that doesnt get the short end of the stick or a a cool (no pun intended Bobby Drake). Was alwasy to Dawson Creekish for me in the other movies. I did dig Kelsey Grammer as Beast..and I cant really say much about Angel..as he didnt really have a whole lot to do in the 3rd movie.

  • Please, what are we selling here? They're doing enough damage re-writing the Spider-Man movies (even though they aren't even ten years old yet), why can't they just re-write this so the first class is the real First Class? I want Cyclops, Jean, Beast, Angel, and Iceman. Actually, I just want them to stop making X-Men movies until we can come to a better agreement as to what direction to take. It's condescending to say that "X-Men is a bigger brand name" because it suggests that ever fan of the book will accept any piece of crap that make and through at us. The Film AND Comic world deserve better than this. Oh, and Magneto looks about as threatening as a sock-puppet that's missing an eye and was in fact made out of a brown paper bag that a homeless man used as a urinal.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 10:14 a.m. CST

    SO THE BLONDE HAS TITS & THE BLUE ONE AIN'T NAKED. BIG DEAL

    by JonChambers

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 10:14 a.m. CST

    LOOKS LIKE MORE TEENAGE TWEENER TWILIGHT SHIT. FUCK IT!!

    by JonChambers

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 10:15 a.m. CST

    BTW - WHEN DID WOLVERINE GET SUCH A FAKE, BAD SUNBURN???

    by JonChambers

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 10:38 a.m. CST

    According to Vaughan...

    by Bootskin

    The group shot is BS and not a Fox image. Also, theres a pic with Fassbender in the yellow & blue suit with a VERY faithful-to-the-comics Magneto helmet on floating around the net as well. Im' not going to bother posting it, because I'm not a "journalist". Lurk moar AICN.....

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 11:37 a.m. CST

    Who are these characters?

    by knowthyself

    And why should I care?

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 11:44 a.m. CST

    So . . .

    by Nick

    This is different from the leaked pic how?

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 12:39 p.m. CST

    HAHAHA

    by ObiBen

    Hi-Rez cheezevomit.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 2:11 p.m. CST

    Actually...

    by Meta

    The Blue Fur Beast was created because Hank McCoy discovered what he thought was the mutagen that could mutants out of humans while working for the Brand Corporation. The effects were reversible if an antidote was given to him within a few hours. He used it on himself to see what would happen if the mutigen was used on a mutant, which created the blue fur beast. Unfortunately he got caught up with fighting some bad guys and didn't get back in time to use the antidote, which forced him to stay as the beast permanently. But yes, I agree Hank McCoy should not be blue, at least not a first.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 2:41 p.m. CST

    I'm shooting for a January release...

    by Boo Cocky

    HEYOOOO!!!

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 2:53 p.m. CST

    These are NOT official

    by Lucius Woodhouse

    My friend is working on the finishes. These are BS.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 3:57 p.m. CST

    Looks stupid

    by the_juicy_box_of_megan_fox

    Oddly, I'm not that surprised at how awful this looks.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 10:32 p.m. CST

    i still can't say anything..the yellow & black works though.

    by NorthTronic