Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Spy Cams Catch The New Spidey In Action While Filming A J. Jonah Jameson-less(?) SPIDER-MAN Reboot!!

Merrick here...

Some industrious folks managed to grab video footage of Marc Webb's SPIDER-MAN being filmed. Both  reels show what appears to be the same stunt, observed from different angles.

A second angle comes to us from TMZ, and can be found HERE.

Meanwhile, THIS piece at IGN is saying that Peter Parker's boss at The Daily Bugle...J. Jonah Jameson...won't appear in the film.  This doesn't mean The Daily Bugle couldn't appear in the movie, but if it does, it sounds like Mr. Jameson won't be around.  

Finally, one of our readers sent in this nice & brightened-via-software image of Andrew Garfield in costume, which we got our first look at last week, giving us quite a bit more detail of what lies in the shadowy areas of the official image and revealing quite a bit more of the suit's detail.  

 

 

— follow Merrick on Twitter ! --

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8 a.m. CST

    Yep

    by Uridium

    Just like the suits I was able to make at High School.....

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:06 a.m. CST

    Did anyone else think 'small package'?

    by Big_Bubbaloola

    Ok, only me then. That's rather embarrasing.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:07 a.m. CST

    Why a reboot? Why not just another Spiderman movie with different people?

    by Drunken Busboy

    It's works for James Bond. Everytime a new actor plays Bond we don't see an origin story. Spiderman like Superman is iconic most of us already know how he came to be.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:07 a.m. CST

    Merchandising, where the real money from the movies is made

    by Megaforce

    brand "new" Spiderman toys from the latest movie, coming with a Happy Meal near you...

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:08 a.m. CST

    To be fair...

    by drumble

    They probably figured that they couldn't eclipse J.K. Simmons so quickly, which is probably why characters like Norman Osborne are also being saved up. It's the same mentality as the Nolan reboots of Batman, make the first film a way to re-establish the star of the show, the hero, then the audience will give you far more faith to re-introduce the other characters. I mean, everyone thought that Nicholson would be the only Joker, but once they saw that Batman Begins was a completely different take on the universe they totally went with a new actor in the part, and in a completely different way. Considering that a character like the Green Goblin was actually rather badly rendered in the Raimi version (not in Defoe's performance, but certainly the costume) I'm sure that audiences will embrace a new story arc for that character in a second film, done more faithfully, and this time obviously including Gwen in that fateful bridge scene. As for Jameson, it will take a lot to remove the memory of Simmons, he's virtually a walking, talking, breathing version the original comics.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:08 a.m. CST

    Spidey should fight Black Swan

    by dead youngling

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:08 a.m. CST

    I think it needs the belt

    by rev_skarekroe

    Without it it looks like he's going surfing or something.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:12 a.m. CST

    Hugh Laurie

    by frankenberry

    J. Jonah Jameson should be played by Hugh Laurie or Stephen Lang in the reboot.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:14 a.m. CST

    No JJJ?

    by bat725

    This movie just gets worse and worse.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:22 a.m. CST

    so is it re-boot or sequel

    by vin_diggler

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:22 a.m. CST

    I keep seeing "spider-man 4" in some places

    by vin_diggler

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:30 a.m. CST

    Americans loves them some superheros

    by BadlyDubbedPorn

    Why are superhero's almost a North American exclusivity? Why does America NEED Superhero's? And Organics FTW, the only reason there not is to sell the "New And Improved Actual Spidey Slingers...From Mattel"

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:40 a.m. CST

    Well said, Drumble...

    by Somerichs

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:42 a.m. CST

    Badlydubbedporn

    by Long Tooth

    The same reason the Japanese need giant robots and Europeans need fascists... Who can say?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:46 a.m. CST

    long tooth

    by Carl XVI Gustaf

    One of the best replies I've ever read here! :)

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:48 a.m. CST

    True, And the Japanese also have Ultraman I suppose he's a superhero

    by BadlyDubbedPorn

    But Whyyyy?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:54 a.m. CST

    frankenberry

    by AKA_Gern_Blanston

    MARVELous idea! As much as I love JK Simmons' JJJ, I think Hugh Laurie would be excellent in the role, and it would give him a chance to let American audiences see him in a prominent role outside of Dr House. I doubt many in the US have seen Black Adder or A Bit of Fry and Laurie (though they ARE on netflix but I doubt many search them out).

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:56 a.m. CST

    maybe the belt comes off separately?

    by Righteous Brother

    i admit, I miss the red belt. Glad the mechanical web shooters are back though!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:06 a.m. CST

    nice try sony

    by spidercoz

    "Spy" cam footage I'm sure. Funny how all these "leaks" are happening all of the sudden. It's like Sony's half-assed clandestine attempt at drumming up geek word of mouth since they shot themselves in the ass last time around. As if to say, "See? See? We're making a cool Spidey movie. Right? Eh? Eh? Nudge nudge, wink wink." This entire thing smacks of them trying way too hard with too little put into it. If they actually thought they were making a good movie they'd keep a lid on it.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:07 a.m. CST

    maybe he didnt make the new suit?

    by edge9000x

    in the ultimate universe, he was given the suit when he started wrestling because he had the same lame suit that tobey made first in the movies.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:09 a.m. CST

    5 minutes....

    by Dead_Geek

    ... to design the new suit? Looks that way to me. Weak.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:14 a.m. CST

    Early package mention

    by Katet19

    Early on in pre production I recall reading an article about specific effort being taken to tone down this cat's junk because it was almost immediately too revealing in the new suit. Why they'd take so much effort to dial down the new spidey's only organic web shooter I don't know.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:18 a.m. CST

    spidercoz

    by fpuk99

    I don't think Sony give a shit about the 'geek' word of mouth as having 'geeks' / 'fanboys' on board does not a blockbuster make (as numerous films have proved it is an inconsequential demographic). However, I agree that the 'leaks' are well timed to drum up interest among the larger internet community.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:28 a.m. CST

    I truly hate this costume. Why the muted colors?

    by Snake Foreskin

    And why does it look like a cheap latex adult Halloween costume? It literally looks like one you'd buy at Halloween Express. I am so tired of Hollywood's sensibilities screwing up the simplest details, let alone the core characteristics that make the comics so classic.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:41 a.m. CST

    spidercoz, geeks are the tastemakers for geek movies!

    by DarkHawke

    If geeks will go see it and report back enthusiastically, then the hoi-poloi will get interested and go. Works every time. Look at financially successful geek films that DIDN'T get much geek love: Superman Returns, Watchmen, Batman Returns, Spider-man 4. All of the above made money, great money in some cases, but once geeks saw them, they shrugged, said "enh!" and moved on. Only Batman Returns got a sequel (of sorts), but with a new director and star, and we know the rat hole THAT franchise went down till Nolan took it up. I picked up the first two Raimi Spider-man movies on Blu-ray during Christmas and finally watched 'em yesterday, drowning the sorrow of my Seahawks loss in a geeky way. Them's are still two great flicks and I can't conceive of any way that this effort will equal either, let alone surpass them. Might as well add "Sony's pointless Spider-man reboot" to the list above!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:44 a.m. CST

    Suit Complaints . . . .

    by kevinwillis.net

    It doesn't look like a cheap latex suit, or like they only spent 5 minutes on it, but . . . what is it with the texture? Does each iteration of a super-suit have to have increasingly more textured surfaces? It's like he's wearing some really expensive multi-colored sand paper. With bumps and knobbies. Although, instead of jutting out, the spider is now impressed down into the suit . . . The question remaining as to why Peter Parker would spend so much time, effort, and yes, money crafting the suit in question. He's fighting criminals. Body stocking, mask, done. It'd take even a genius fashion designer type with the necessary latex casting equipment and sewing machines weeks, maybe months, to get a suit that complicated together. Would that time be better spent working on his web shooters?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:52 a.m. CST

    The hell you all on about? The costume is great

    by Smack_Teddy

    One of you thinks you made this in high school or college then proove it too me as im pretty sure your talking shit....even if its an early costume the fact you would complain that it doesnt look like a fucking Sony PS3-bell end tells me all about what Spidey-Peter Parker might really mean to you as a character/penis extention/another costume theme at a sex-fetish party with Silver Surfer, Batman, GL, Ape Sapian etc...<p> And at the risk of sounding monumentally stupid: what the sweet-fuck-nutting-fuck about the illuminated picture above clearly-obviously shows that its mechanical web-shooters!? Am i blind!?<p>Mechanical web shooters are a good idea, i would rather this incarnation focus less on the material being a metaphor or euphemism for dealing with & mastering puberty and spinning a web of jerk-off in someones face before they bring the jerk-off to you or others (although thats always going to be part of the material in one stage of Spidermans legacy)...i remember the genius that like Dr Who just has a face (and voice) that no one listens to so he becomes Spiderman with his powers & inventions & everyman problems instead.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:57 a.m. CST

    As those of us old enough to have suffered through....

    by HarryKnowlesNonExistentInceptionReview

    ...both Batman Forever and Batman and Robin first hand well know... codpieces are a baaaad sign in a superhero movie.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 9:59 a.m. CST

    Are they doing any shoots in NTC?

    by HarryKnowlesNonExistentInceptionReview

    Or are we stuck with LA-asNYC like in the Daredevil movie? Of course Toronto-as-NYC a la The Incredible Hulk is even worse, but it's still lame!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10 a.m. CST

    That should be: ...any shoots in NYC

    by HarryKnowlesNonExistentInceptionReview

    Still no fn Preview feature. Arrgh!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:02 a.m. CST

    Reminds me of that scene from Star Trek: The Motion Picture

    by Benovite1

    You know the scene early in the movie when Kirk confronts Decker on the Enterprise. Decker's standing there in that terribly simple uniform that shows a bit too much. Meanwhile the audience is thinking, "if there was ever a time for a skirt to be a on a guy this would be it." Can we put a skirt on this Spiderman or something?? THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:05 a.m. CST

    I'm old enough to have suffered through...

    by Righteous Brother

    the original Spider-Man tv show with Nicholas Hammond. Spidey fighting purse snatchers and petty crooks week after week. A couple of episodes he fought some ninjas - these episodes were spliced together and released theatrically in the UK....terrible. The idea of Spidey fighting the Green Goblin, Dr Octopus and Sandman on the big screen was almost too much to be able to contemplate. Speaking of which who are the villains in this film?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:07 a.m. CST

    drumble

    by Smooth Lando

    Drumble - I hear what your saying and it's a good point. But there's one problem with that logic. While I agree that applies to the villains of past films of the franchise - it's almost embarrassing if certain iconic mainstays aren't there. The Joker was left out of Batman Begins but not his main supporting characters. Not having J. Jonah Jameson in a Spider-Man movie is the equivalent of not having Alfred or Commissioner Gordon in a Batman movie. Yeah - J.K. Simmons was AMAZING in all 3 movies. But the bottom line is, if you're not gonna put the character in the movie, what the hell's the point of making it? I'm not one of the typical "This is gonna suck/I hate everything/They raped my childhood" talkbackers ... but man ... I've been in the "Why the hell are they rebooting his origin" camp since day 1. I think I'm in the majority of comic/Spidey fans that just wishes Sony would sell back Spider-Man's rights to Marvel/Dinsey so the character could continue on and interact with the Avengers crowd.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:08 a.m. CST

    he looks great..THAT"S peter parker.

    by FleshMachine

    yep

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:13 a.m. CST

    Nice! Real human stunts :)

    by CodeName

    I'm all for cg when used appropriately, but wow, I'm impressed with this shot already.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:17 a.m. CST

    Is that a mosquito logo or daddy long legs?

    by Flip63Hole

    Hard to tell. Hopefully there's a point in the movie where he fixed it? Big Spiderman fan for 30+ years. I'll probably pass on this whole clusterfuck...

  • Smart not to tackle that character again until later in the series

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:24 a.m. CST

    Why can't we have a black Spiderman?

    by moorE12

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:36 a.m. CST

    No JJJ = Flames on optimus, nipples on Batsuit

    by Blanket-Man

    Or AICN without technical problems.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:36 a.m. CST

    or a white Black Lightning

    by Astronut

    for that matter. oh come on. who cares?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:37 a.m. CST

    Why Can't We Have A Frumpy Lesbian Spider-Man?

    by Autodidact

    I ask you.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:46 a.m. CST

    Ugh that costume...

    by darthwaz1

    Where does Peter get the money to afford this high-tech mesh outfit?? What the hell is that thing even made of? He had the same material costume in the last series and it made no sense there either! why does it look so high tech and where did he get it??

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:48 a.m. CST

    I agree, bring on black-suit spidey

    by spidercoz

    oh, that's not what you meant? whatever

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:54 a.m. CST

    beezbo, are you forgetting the magic that is Reeve as Supes?

    by The Krypton Kid

    THAT'S the greatest superhero film casting ever. But yes, Simmons was great as Jameson.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:01 a.m. CST

    I can see

    by Geekgasm

    the outline of his little spider-cock. I'm not crazy about the costume but I would so fuck that guy.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:03 a.m. CST

    LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THAT CRANIUM

    by werewolfbynight

    He should play the leader in the inevitable 3rd Hulk movie.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:19 a.m. CST

    Belt RIpped Off?

    by terry

    not sure, but maybe the belt was ripped off in a fight, because on the new brightened picture, there are seems where the belt would be, and the red at the middle of his waist is cleaner than that of the rest of the suit... also one of the spy videos clearly shows a red belt line along his back... what do you guys think?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:25 a.m. CST

    Smart move! Nobody can surpass J.K. Simmons' version of JJJ

    by Quadrillionaire

    so they decided not to bother at all.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:28 a.m. CST

    That´s the most boring video I´ve seen all day

    by Ditko

    Thanks!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:29 a.m. CST

    JJJ

    by elsewhere

    Why would J. Jonah Jameson be in this? It's an origin story that takes place in high school. Well before Parker is hired for the Daily Bugle and I disagree J.K Simmons is the definitive JJJ. He was good, but a little too silly. People are complaining that the suit looks too advanced? Really? I don't see any intricate silver, raised webbing. This suit clearly has flaws which it should and whatever else you perceive to look advanced, well he constructed mechanical web-shooters ffs!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:32 a.m. CST

    That spidey can run really fast

    by LowDevil

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:35 a.m. CST

    Nicholas Hammond

    by solitaire

    Say what you want about the 70's spider man show. Yes, It was never explained how the hell he made the suit. Yes, there was no uncle ben, but the trauma of almost being run down by an old guy going 2 miles an hour down a wide alley jump started his powers. Yes, Hammond wore bell bottoms so effin' huge that no one else in the country could buy jeans for weeks because of the denim shortage. Yes, the boots had platform heels and the webs were drawn on them by an epileptic on a coffee high...these thing and more are all true, but Nicholas Hammond was a GREAT Peter Parker. The John Romita version brought to life. He took that part seriously and did a fantastic job. I still watch that series and have a great time. The man should have a cameo in this film, he deserves that much.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:42 a.m. CST

    http://tinyurl.com/6hkpt9m

    by Ditko

    There, that´s the suit and that´s a guy that really looks like Peter Parker. Pretty simple.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:43 a.m. CST

    Loved the Hammond Spider-Man series

    by elsewhere

    as a kid. Same with the Reb Brown Captain America, but looking back my gawd were they cheesy. Spider-Man's eyes looked like swimming goggles (which they probably were) and the webbing looked like shoe strings. Good times.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 11:50 a.m. CST

    Ah, fickle fuckers...

    by cricklewood

    I'm so old, I can remember reading the Jim Cameron treatment pre-2002, and watching everyone go batshit crazy over the aberration that was Organic Shooters. Now it's the other way around and everyone hates mechanical? Sheesh.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 12:17 p.m. CST

    long tooth for the win.

    by Stalkeye

    That was funny.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 12:24 p.m. CST

    Hah, I saw both Spiderman and Cap eps on..

    by Stalkeye

    ...sci fi channel if I remember correctly. Campy shit especially the scene in which Spidey swings around the building (replayed stock footage) only to have some chinese dude burn or cut his web rope.Spidey lands on his ass with a big ouch.Cap had freaking wings on his helmet..bwahahahahahaha..oh wait, the new captain a film has the same damn thing. Reb was way more convincing as Rogers/Cap than that fugly Matt Salinger.Gawd, what was Pyun thinking when he was cast as the lead role?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 1:10 p.m. CST

    Jameson-less?? Lame

    by kafka07

    If they do a sequel they better bring him back!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 1:20 p.m. CST

    Mechanical versus Organic

    by Hipshot

    Look...I bought Spider Man #1 when it was first on the shelves, so I've been a Spider-man fan as long, or longer, than anyone here. My all-time favorite comic book character, although the chronology got so fractured in the early 90's that I stopped really buying 'em. That said, when I read James Cameron's treatment and saw the organic web-shooter idea, it made perfect sense. I mean, why the hell not? He can demonstrate his genius in other ways, and anyone who thinks there is no market for short-term insanely powerful adhesive has never used a Post-It note. Sprayable handcuffs, anyone? Aunt May was going into foreclosure every other issue, and if he'd had a way to make money...well, let's just say we agreed to ignore this the way DC fans ignore the fact that Clark and Superman look exactly alike. Cameron plugged that hole beautifully. The fact that he could then use it as a puberty metaphor doesn't change the fact that it fits, it makes sense, and it retrofits the whole situation. I say go with organic.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 1:21 p.m. CST

    So the Lizard IS the baddy? That's cool.

    by the Green Gargantua

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 1:24 p.m. CST

    This movie should have Simmons as Jameson

    by Wormie1

    This is a Spider-Man movie so it should have JJJ and the Bugle in it. J.K. Simmons was awesome (and Tobey was non-awesome!), so he should come back ala Judi Dench as M.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 2:12 p.m. CST

    I'm on the hate train....

    by darthSaul666

    I have to admit I don't like the stylized look of the new costume.. IMO I have feeling this will be Catwoman/Batman & Robin quality... Kinda funny that no one has noticed how this is being rushed since Raimi/McGuire quit SPIDERM4N....

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 2:13 p.m. CST

    looks great

    by oisin5199

    just like the high school Spider-Man in Bendis' Ultimate Spider-Man. Got the hair, look down. I'm ok with no JJJ for this one if they're going the high school route. What high schooler is going to be a professional news photographer? I like that they're taking their time starting the story, sticking with Gwen, saving Mary Jane, the Goblin, and JJJ. Allows them to do some stuff we haven't seen before. Badlydubbedporn, America is the land of superheroes, but superheroes are an international thing - there's lots of European superheroes written by Brits (ever heard of Marvelman or Captain Britain?), the French, and other countries. And superhero movies do boffo international box office. So it ain't just us.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 2:17 p.m. CST

    I think they're are too many lines on the suit

    by alienindisguise

    like the black lines running through the blue..just seems unecessary

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 3:14 p.m. CST

    No Jameson is bad enough, but

    by xile1c

    is Spiderman gonna have his fuckin' mask off through half the movie again?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 3:15 p.m. CST

    Another nail in this coffin

    by Dark Knight Lite

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 3:25 p.m. CST

    im on the fence with the costume

    by misnomer

    I think its hard to top the raimi costume, and is really change for the sake of change. Id like to see the mask and a better still before making a call. I do like the black lines on the legs, think theyre cool, but does seem to be a bit heavy on the texture.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 3:55 p.m. CST

    All I can think about when I see this is:

    by bames_jond

    Ball Sack.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 4:45 p.m. CST

    Organic webbing would come out of his abdomen

    by Dennis_Moore

    not conveniently his wrists

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:18 p.m. CST

    So is this Spider-Man 4, or Spider-Man 1-B? (nt)

    by Triple_J_72

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 6:55 p.m. CST

    That TMZ video link is WRONG.

    by Cheif Brody

    It just relinks to the ING video you already have posted. <p> <p> The TMZ footage, which is ground-level and much closer to the action can be found here: <p> <p> http://tinyurl.com/4wyxyj7

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:34 p.m. CST

    Just keep Simmons like Bond kept Dench!!!

    by Drath

    How fucking stupid do they have to be??! Fuck the nimrod who can't tell this is a different series. Use Simmons again!

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:45 p.m. CST

    Doesn't looks so bad...

    by brattyben

    People always fear change and in the age of the internet sometimes that fear becomes rage and contempt at the drop of a production pic. I'm diggin' the new design and am glad the production team decided to put a bit of a spin on the classic motifs. Heh...spin..see what I did there? Anyway, I'm not too keen on the material. I really wanna believe that Peter made the suit, or hopefully this version it was given to him to keep that air of believability. I'm on the fence about the shooters. I wanna see them, but, if I don't, I'm not going to cry. I like the fact that they are rebooting this. Actually. I don't care. I just want a new Spider-Man movie. I mean, look, they change teams and characters all the time in the comics. And since these are films that are using comics as their source material, it just stands to reason that they would follow suit. Looking for more and hope that some production shots come out on what the mask looks like.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 7:46 p.m. CST

    And as for the belt...

    by brattyben

    I think it's there. I just think it's covered up by whatever muck Peter's been sloshing around in.

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 8:36 p.m. CST

    this is the best fukkin news all year !

    by rikk roberts

    seriously this is the fukkin teets ! im so glad toby maguire is gone ,,,,he honestly wasnt right for the role ,he in no way fit the stature of peter parker .... i dont even know this new kid but he looks great in the suit ,,, also ,,dont know if anyone picked up on this . but if you look real close ,,you can see the web shooters on his wrists ,which pleases me to no end for SOMEONE at least attempting to get it right for the first time in YEARS !!!!!!!!! so big deal if JJJ isnt in the first one ..... im sure by the 2nd or 3rd hell be in them ,,, people shouldnt be so quick to judge .. for all we know this could be the spiderman movie us true fans have been waiting for . i mean honestly ,,,part of me is happy for the original 3 ,,ok but did anyone seriously like the green goblin ? or did anyone get a kick seeing big fat alfred molina running around shirtless in the 2nd one ? and the third was such a damn joke its not even funny ,, it started out good but quickly took a pisser . i can only imagine if raimi had his way how all of those films would have turned out . so in the same breath we should also be thanking sony for coming to their senses and making a more adult themed film ,,,because im tired of hollywood raping the heroes i grew up on by distorting the suits ,the storylines ,the villians ,,,,you name it ,,,,they rape it ...

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:26 p.m. CST

    Green Gargantua: Where's the Lizard proof?

    by Blanket-Man

    Where's the confirmation that Liz is the baddie?

  • Jan. 19, 2011, 10:57 p.m. CST

    moore12

    by Darklighter

    We'll slip one in right after they make an Asian Black Panther.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 12:17 a.m. CST

    whats with his tiny little cock?

    by javery56

    seriously its all knob no shaft.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 12:50 a.m. CST

    No J.K. Simmons = no sell

    by David_Denmans_Beard

    Defined the role. I kept expecting him to bomb out but shit, most entertaining casting choice in the Raimi films by far and large. Sad to think about the potential of them filling the role with someone else. Hopefully it's a damn good choice or they reduce his role significantly in the follow-ups.

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 6:44 a.m. CST

    WTF

    by HongKongCavalier

    What's the deal with the anotomically correct suit??? I might not matter to anyone else, but I will never be able to UNsee Spidey's cameltoesis ... thanks ya bastards

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 9:20 a.m. CST

    no JJJ? and this costume....

    by houbou

    Ok.. If Peter Parker is to work at the Bugle and he doesn't meet JJJ.. That's screwed up.. And Yeah. J.K. Simmons did an awesome JJJ.. but there could be some great alternatives.. I'll keep an open mind, because I've been wrong about a few things in the past.. 1) didn't believe Daniel Craig could pull off James Bond and 2) didn't believe Christian Bale could pull off Batman/Bruce Wayne. Right now, on the quick.. Hugh Laurie could be a great JJJ. Then again, I've not put much thought on the issue, so, I might have a few more suggestions... Now, this costume is kinda high tech looking.. I hope they can explain how a poor teen can access this material. It's not like it came from "Krypton" :P I wonder if the webs will be internal like the Raimi Spiderman or web shooters like the original comic book version of Spidey. When looking at the costume, it sounds like its internal.. What a bummer..

  • Jan. 20, 2011, 10:18 a.m. CST

    WHY ARE PEOPLE SO CHEAP THEY NEVER BUY A ZOOM LENS???

    by JonChambers