Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Peter Jackson Talks The HOBBIT Movie. No Greenlight Yet - 'You can’t believe everything you read'...

Merrick here...
We've taken a bit of hammering here for not covering the purported/impending "greenlight" of THE HOBBIT more fully, and not alluding to Peter Jackson's supposed direction of that project. As difficult as it may be to believe, there is (sometimes) a method to the madness here at AICN. In the case of THE HOBBIT...and how we've been covering it? Peter Jackson's recent discussion with Empire pretty much sums up where the project is at this time...and illustrates why we're taking a more conservative approach to posting about this picture....for the moment, at least. In short: when something seems reasonably solid to us? We'll put it on the site. In THIS chat with Empire, Jackson explains...
“We’ve seen these reports before, reports saying there was going to be a greenlight in a couple of days — well, a week’s gone by and there isn’t one," adds Jackson. "You can’t believe everything you read. There is only one thing you want to believe and that’s when the studio announces a greenlight. As far as I’m aware that’s not going to be today. I keep hearing positive things. Everyone’s working very hard. There’s a lot of people at Warner Bros. who are working around the clock trying to manoeuvre through the MGM complexities. MGM is a company that is about to go bankrupt and in a way they are about to take The Hobbit into bankruptcy hell with them when they go down. Warners are trying to extract The Hobbit out of the bankruptcy hell before it happens. It is just so complicated I can’t even put my head into it. It’s all to do with American copyright laws, bankruptcy laws. A lot of Warner Bros. lawyers are working round the clock at the moment trying to make it happen so let’s see."
There's much more in Empire's report, so be sure to check it out. In the meantime...just for a bit longer...because of the enormous legal complexities involved in getting the project fully up & running, it's best to take much of what we see and hear about this show with a sizable grain of salt unless such news comes from a studio, or has been confirmed by Jackson in some way, or is inescapably, obviously correct. HOPEFULLY the film will roll in early 2011 - but it sounds like some dominoes still have to fall...in just the right way...before that can actually happen. Waiting, with fingers crossed...
--- Follow Merrick on Twitter! ---

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Oct. 8, 2010, 10:57 a.m. CST

    FIRST

    by timtaylor

    Just wanted to see it

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 10:58 a.m. CST

    Hmm....

    by Damned if I can login

    Can't say that I'm that interested.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:02 a.m. CST

    Superman, Worlds End & Ghostbusters 3.....

    by HarryWhereIsYourInceptionReview

    Are also coming out December 2012. Looking forward to the end of the world in style!

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:04 a.m. CST

    yeah our copyright laws are stupid

    by spidercoz

    propped up by the greedy motherfuckers who run everything

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:09 a.m. CST

    Fucking MGM.

    by Dreadlock Holmes

    Someone needs to take Bond away from them too.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:14 a.m. CST

    What about all the supposed union bullshit?

    by MelvintheMopBoy

    And about taking this thing to Australia or fucking Canada or some horseshit? Been reading alot about actor's unions and stuff preventing this movie from happening in NZ. What's going on there?

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:15 a.m. CST

    oh, now there are journalistic...

    by THE_CHOPPAH_STRIKES_BACK

    standards! <P> AICN, you have been chopped.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:31 a.m. CST

    After Kong

    by proevad

    and the lovely bones, I'm not even sure i want to pay to see this. Sad, cuz I was in love with the trilogy at one time.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:33 a.m. CST

    Choppah, you've become old.

    by A G

    Stop posting this stupid shit. Or continue for a few months until people simply skip over your posts without reading them. Keep posting until even you become bored with it an find something else to do. Or just stop now. You're old. You don't make a difference anymore. Sorry.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:34 a.m. CST

    Good story about the union mess...

    by morGoth

    ...over at theonering.net. I'm optimistic that things will work themselves out (no way the production will move to Australia) relatively soon. Meanwhile...Go PJ! Direct the living hell outta this thing but please...NO FARTING/BELCHING DWARVES!!! Sigh, and it looks like it's going to be 3D...bother.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:35 a.m. CST

    MelvintheMopBoy

    by XoanonTORN

    The NZ/AU unions were in a complete tizzy about having actors work without a bargaining agreement, PJ and his team keep telling them it is illegal under NZ law. The unions keep saying it isn't..sadly they are both right AND wrong..the law is ambiguous at best. Suffice it to say there is a very real possibility of the film going to Sweden, Ireland or Australia...I doubt it will come to Canada (though that would work out perfectly for me). They are still working on it and having dealings. <p> It also came at the exact wrong time for PJ and his team, could be a horrible coincidence or done on purpose..the unions could be under the same impression that the film will start soon. <p> Work is still being done, but nothing is set in stone..so it's cast a pall on the whole thing. But hope still lingers. <p> I'll be covering it all on TORN, and perhaps my radio show as well. Cheers.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:36 a.m. CST

    The Hobbit's fate in the hands of lawyers??!!!

    by ludmir88

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:38 a.m. CST

    Sorry, Pete, but I can believe everything I read

    by I87D

    and I will continue do so at my own peril.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:40 a.m. CST

    The Hobbit is cursed like The Man Who Killed

    by kunispluspenis

    Don Quixote

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:41 a.m. CST

    Too bad it won't be Del Toro.

    by rev_skarekroe

    The Hobbit needs a lighter touch than LotR, and Jackson has zero conception of subtlety.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:46 a.m. CST

    xoanon

    by sweeneydave

    Good to see you here on AICN. I first discovered this site through TORN back when LOTR production was beginning. Days of innocence.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:51 a.m. CST

    Yaaaawwwn. Whatever . . .

    by Nice Marmot

    . . . tell me when the first trailer is out, AICN.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:51 a.m. CST

    WAY TOO LATE..

    by louisse

    People are moving on. Really they've had enough LOTR. I can't watch those silly movies no more, even though I used to love em. They should have started production the time it was still smashing theaters.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:55 a.m. CST

    sweeneydave

    by XoanonTORN

    Cheers, thanks for that. See you on TORN!

  • Oct. 8, 2010, noon CST

    Agreed...the Fire For This Died a Year Ago...

    by Read and Shut Up

    ...when Guillermo del Toro bailed. He probably saw the writing on the wall and got out while the gettin' was good.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:02 p.m. CST

    ughhh

    by fat_rancor_keeper

    fuck hobbit, mgm, peter jackson, the bond seroes and fuck me

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:04 p.m. CST

    just die already you stupid fucking lion

    by antonphd

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:09 p.m. CST

    Call this a hunch.... BUT

    by --- Emperor ---

    I do believe that Peter Jackson has a hairy asshole. In fact, I'm willing to bed he has a nice thick black bush poking out of his butt crack... [p] I'm sure his wife knows all about it....

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:10 p.m. CST

    Call this a hunch.... BUT

    by --- Emperor ---

    I do believe that Peter Jackson has a hairy asshole. In fact, I'm willing to bet he has a nice thick black bush poking out of his butt crack... <p> I'm sure his wife knows all about it....

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:11 p.m. CST

    Auuugh!

    by DarthJedi

    Man, this is getting depressing. I think I'm just going to ignore any news on this until I hear a positive greenlight. At least it'll save me some hair.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:16 p.m. CST

    Just post stories, rumours and all...

    by Fah-Cue

    Stop with the bullshit "journalistic integrity" this site supposedly has. This is just another of the movie blog sites out there. Harry and company act as if they're the Woodward and Bernstein of geek news. Give me a break! Like we'd take your posting of "Hobbit nearing greenlight" to mean it HAS been greenlit?! Way to treat us readers like retards.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:21 p.m. CST

    guaranteed in 2-3 months

    by fat_rancor_keeper

    ....the next hobbit news will just be some more bullshit that actually has NOTHING to do with the move actually moving closer to existence.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:24 p.m. CST

    What a CLUSTER!!!

    by Reckoner

    This damn thing has been in development for 5 years, so here's to another 5!!!

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:24 p.m. CST

    As one poster said above....

    by Damned if I can login

    ...I'm in love with the Trilogy as well, but that would be *Tolkien's* Trilogy. As for Jackson's trilogy (note the lack of a capital letter), I care hardly a hair on a rat's ass, if that much.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:27 p.m. CST

    agreed with Fah-Cue

    by Rocco Curioso

    (or "Fu Yu", if he decides to get all Sinophile). Don't drink this weekend's Purple Kool-Aid, kids! It's just a cheap/lazy ploy to pile up posts until Monday (not convenient like last week's Celebrity Death Barrage, which was a gimme for observational zingers 'n' stuff).

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:29 p.m. CST

    The Hobbit is the Duke Nuken Forever...

    by lostboytexas

    of the movie world. By the time it eventually gets made no one will give a shit.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:33 p.m. CST

    Let's face it guys and gals...

    by HarryKnowlesNonExistentInceptionReview

    ...The Hobbit is NEVER getting made. It's just a fact. MGM just filed for Chapter 11 and Jackson, after to very "meh" movies, just doesn't have the gravitas he had 5 or 6 years ago. It's never getting made, at least not anytime soon and not with Jackson involved in any way. Accommodate and move on, folks!

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:44 p.m. CST

    Very interesting, PrestigeWorldwide . . .

    by Nice Marmot

    . . . but its the fucking MOD Squad, dumbass.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:49 p.m. CST

    Jesus, Nice

    by proevad

    You're not very nice.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:53 p.m. CST

    WAY TOO LATE?

    by slone13

    That's asinine.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:54 p.m. CST

    OF COURSE The Hobbit will get made

    by slone13

    You don't NOT make movies that are guaranteed to bring in BILLIONS.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 12:54 p.m. CST

    HarryKnowlesNonExistentInception Review

    by fat_rancor_keeper

    is likely right. they should CUT their losses and officially scrap this for now.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 1:03 p.m. CST

    It's Been Cursed

    by PickingNits

    by the Necromancer.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 1:17 p.m. CST

    Bad news that PJ is directing.

    by fitzcarraldo2

    He's lost all lightness of touch, as King Kong showed. He's not quite a Lucas but he's heading that way. I dread this. He should at least be kept on a tight leash and have people not afraid to tell him when something he wants to do is shite.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 1:20 p.m. CST

    Why in

    by BanditDarville

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 1:23 p.m. CST

    It's MOD Squad

    by rev_skarekroe

    If you're going to bitch about an inconsequential movie, at least get the title right.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 1:23 p.m. CST

    Why in God's name did AOL Time Warner/New Line..

    by BanditDarville

    not negotiate for the Hobbit rights when they signed contracts for the Lord of the Rings rights? Looks like it could have saved a bunch of money on legal fees instead of going through this dog and pony show.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 1:28 p.m. CST

    Slone13

    by louisse

    I would watch no matter when it comes out (all of us dickheads would) but I would've surely loved it a 100 times more if it came out 4 years ago...

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 1:53 p.m. CST

    slone13

    by fat_rancor_keeper

    MGM don't nots makes movies all the time. They don't not made robocop and a new bond movie just recently.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 2:15 p.m. CST

    posting around the clock

    by AzzyAzzy

    reports about being on a clock

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 2:21 p.m. CST

    WHAT?! FUCK THE HOBBIT! SAVE BOND!!!

    by ricarleite2

    You are in a sinking ship. That sinking ship is MGM, a studio obviously run down by IDIOTS, I mean, how can a movie studio go bankrupt? Anywhoo, there comes this life boat, and there's place for one. On your right you got 1960s Sean Connery, tears in his eyes, with a martini and a gun. On the left you see Elijah Wood dressed as Frodo, also crying. Sean Connery asks you to hurry up and make up your mind. You can take one to the boat. The whole thing here is: YOU DO NOT FUCKING TAKE THE HOBBIT. You take the KICK ASS SUPER SPY.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 2:22 p.m. CST

    This becoming the Duke Nukem Forever of movies.

    by BrandonGK

    It'll be 2020 before this hits theaters.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 2:32 p.m. CST

    Theveryfirst

    by GINGE_MUPPET

    Is Chop your lover??? .... If not why are you SO far up his ass?

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 2:53 p.m. CST

    Let's get Bond Moving?!

    by BlackBriar

    Come on Greenlight Bond 23 already? Sony and MGM have to be working on something??

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 3:07 p.m. CST

    And let's not get started on the bloody...

    by zer05um

    Aussie union that has reared up and made a mess on this too.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 3:25 p.m. CST

    Jackson's King Kong was great.

    by Fah-Cue

    God, I hate the posters on this website! Whiny bitches.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 3:41 p.m. CST

    I assume Jackson will (might) do a good job

    by daggor

    His heavy-handedness with Kong looked to be him jerking off all over a story he loved too much.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 4:01 p.m. CST

    Aint gonna happen.

    by disfigurehead

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 4:02 p.m. CST

    this movIe is doomed

    by fat_rancor_keeper

    DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 4:35 p.m. CST

    Geektard

    by Failure101

    I wont defend Choppah, but I will defend herpie sores. They can be hilarious, as long as they're on someone else.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 5:04 p.m. CST

    80 Days

    by Could_Harrys_Oblong_Penis_Penetrate_Another_Hermaphrodite

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 5:13 p.m. CST

    Just make the film...

    by KubricksBellEnd

    ...and call it "The Hibbot" - there, copyright laws sidestepped! No, don't thank me. I was just doing my duty...

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 5:21 p.m. CST

    Could not give a fart...

    by windomearle39

    If either this or Bond never see the light of day.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 5:42 p.m. CST

    My Kong Viewing experience

    by proevad

    Still in my worshiping Peter Jackson phase so i go in the theater. My thoughts during viewing... 1. Movie starts. Jesus, Jack Black is horrible. WTF was he thinking casting him. 2. Usually like Adrian Brody, but again...this isn't working. 3. Omg I'm bored. 4. Cool, we are at the island 5. CGI is below average in the dino chase. 6. When are we leaving the island? 7. Omg my back hurts and I have to pee. 8. Still not over, why the hell did I pay to see a movie about a giant ape? 9. Credits roll. Didn't remember half of what I had just seen. And I still don't. Honestly can't remember most of the damned film. Just remember the feeling of boredom and disappointment. For those who love it, good for you. But, I just have no interest in watching it again. Then I saw the Lovely Bones with lowered expectations, and it was just laughably bad. So, here we are waiting for a movie that's never going to be made, by a director that I don't give a shit about anymore. Death of heroes is sad. Lost Lucas and Jackson in my lifetime. Sometimes the muse is just a mean, nasty bitch who packs her shit and leaves to fuck the pool boy.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 5:55 p.m. CST

    And thats why Empire gave Lovely Bones 4/5

    by HELLSFOXES

    Gotta look out for your pals

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 5:56 p.m. CST

    Have to admit I've never seen the original

    by proevad

    Sin for a film geek I know. Did see the POS 70's version at a drive-in when I was a kid and hated it. I think the 70's version is the reason I never had an interest to watch the original. Oh, I've read all the essays and know the history of the original, but to this day I have zero interest in watching it.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 5:59 p.m. CST

    Geektard_Smasher

    by Baryonyx

    I fully agree: Kong was utter shit. Jackson should put on weight again and maybe become a good director again.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 6:02 p.m. CST

    Geektard_Smasher

    by Baryonyx

    Sh, I just read that you didn't like the 70's Kong either. Sorry, but I LOVE that movie - and it has the best, hottest Kong-babe!

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 6:02 p.m. CST

    "Theveryfirst"

    by A G

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 6:02 p.m. CST

    Hi, you're new

    by A G

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 6:10 p.m. CST

    Can we please have non-gay hobbits this time?

    by SmokingRobot

    "Oh, Mr. Frodo...you complete me."

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 6:11 p.m. CST

    Agreed about Jackson's Kong

    by SmokingRobot

    Christ, what a total conceptual disaster.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 7:08 p.m. CST

    Even Jackson sounds disappointed in the dvd commentary

    by ludmir88

    just listen to him right after the credits start to roll. yeah i know i bought the extended dvd edition, i love and kind of hate this movie.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 7:28 p.m. CST

    We need a hobbit film, vampires are taking over.

    by hippolyta

    I think having distance between the LOTR trilogy and the Hobbit is a good thing. It's a separate book, an almost completely new cast, people need to watch it without wanting it to be a 4th LOTR film.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 9:24 p.m. CST

    FX

    by mos6507

    "How the hell did people rave about that toon a mere eight years ago?" Maybe focus a little more on the story and the characters and not judge a movie solely on how immersive the FX are. Then maybe the entertainment you take in won't just go in and out of you like a Big-Mac.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 9:29 p.m. CST

    is everyone forgetting the crap Jackson put out last?

    by Witwiki50

    The lovely bones! biggest pile of shit ive ever seen, and as for the Hobbit! is Jackson really going to be stuck in this LOTR bubble for the rest of his life?! come on, dont do a George Lucas on us and forever go on and on with star was/ LOTR. Expansion!

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 10:08 p.m. CST

    Re: Witwiki50

    by ricarleite2

    You probably never seen "Dead Alive", Peter Jackson's best movie. He should return to comedy-horror B flicks.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 10:55 p.m. CST

    BrandonGK the funny thing is that DNF will come out next year

    by KilliK

    but the production of Hobbit hasnt even started yet.heh.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 10:57 p.m. CST

    Jackson's KK is the perfect example of what happens when

    by KilliK

    the artist falls too deeply in love with his work,especially when he gets some new,cool tools to play with.

  • Oct. 8, 2010, 11:33 p.m. CST

    I hope there's a part

    by Shaw

    where it goes "dum dum dum... dum dum"

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 12:54 a.m. CST

    About that "completely plastic Gollum"

    by mortsleam

    Before TTT came out, Cinefex Magazine and TORN had an exclusive still from the movie showing Frodo with his knife to Gollum's throat. Needless to say, the image was stunning. So stunning, in fact, that one of our fellow posters decried it as fake, claiming that the Gollum shown in the picture was obviously a wax dummy because "you can see light through his ear just the way it works in reality."<p>Of course this poster was wrong. Dead wrong. The image was a still taken directly from the print of the film, showing the cgi work so groundbreaking and seamless that it fooled even a die-hard naysayer. Get it? He didn't think it looked fake, he thought it looked *SO REAL* that it had to be actual wax replica, couldn't possibly be a digitally created image. When he was proven wrong and realized he couldn't start a fight that way, he moved on. Started calling people "elitist" and impersonating them in the talkback.<p>Not sure what the lesson is here, except that these movies which "haven't aged well" and were "never any good" certainly do seem to bring up stroooooong emotions.<p>Meanwhile, I for one hope Jackson doesn't get a chance to direct the Hobbit, because even though I love LOTR, there are definitely flaws that I cannot overlook, and his self-indulgence has increased exponentially with every movie. Kong was a serious misfire. Lovely Bones was just plain awful. The worst movie he's made. Maybe going back to the Hobbit would be the shot in the arm Jackson needs to right himself. I don't see it happening, and perhaps if MGM loses the film and PJ moves on to other things, we'll find a director that's right for the job.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 1:01 a.m. CST

    mortsleam well said

    by KilliK

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 1:50 a.m. CST

    indeed killkl, well said mortsleam....utter

    by southafricanguy

    nonsense that LOTR has 'nt aged well. Those films are still damn good, and Im not even a big LOTR fan. Absolutely Jacksons crowning glory...

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 1:52 a.m. CST

    And they hold up just fine....though I do think

    by southafricanguy

    ROTK is a bit dragged out..

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 1:56 a.m. CST

    As for KK....Turd, hows it going buddy? I agree

    by southafricanguy

    that its not that bad, certainly not as bad as people make it out to be. But its not really very good either. There s far too much filler, scenes that have no pay-off, seem to go nowhere, and are just pointless. Jack Black is miscast, and the film does feel somewhat self-indulgent. The Skull Island stuff is good adventure, and mostly works, but there are a number of odd creative choices, and really..why turn a 90 minute film into an almost 3 hour film?

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 2:27 a.m. CST

    I have nt seen the lovly bones yet, so I cant

    by southafricanguy

    comment on that, but I dont hear good things. Is it really that bad? Yikes...because if it is, it makes one wonder if Jackson still has the ability to make a good film set in the LOTR world...

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 4:44 a.m. CST

    Tarantino on Jackson's King Kong

    by InActionMan

    From an interview Tarantino did on NPR's Fresh Air: <P> "To me "King Kong" is a metaphor for America's fear of the black male. And to me that's obvious. All right? So I mean that was one of the first things I said when I was talking to a friend of mine after he saw Peter Jackson's version of "King Kong." And I said, you know, is the racial metaphors in there? Is the racial subtext in there? And he goes no. And I go, well then that's just a story of a big monkey. " <P> You can listen to the interview or read the transcript here: <P> http://tinyurl.com/ko96gw <P>

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 7:39 a.m. CST

    HEAVENLY CREATURES...

    by blackwood

    ...is Jackson's best film. I feel this is indisputable. I love DEAD ALIVE as much as the next guy, but HEAVENLY CREATURES is in a league of it's own, and certainly better than anything else he's done.<P>But I have to admit, I love his KING KONG. Love it to bits. There's an adventuresome recklessness in it that I find very charming. And Naomi Watts is so incredibly good in it. I won't dispute that it could lose about an hour and be a far better film for it. But I still like it a lot.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 9:20 a.m. CST

    blackwood

    by proevad

    Agreed. HC is a masterpiece. I have to defend LOTR as his 2nd masterpiece and probably his last. Does it have a few problems? Yeah. It's a 9 hour movie, of course it does. Still to this day think Elijah was miscast and sections of TTT don't work at all. Fellowship extended edition and Return of the King theatrical are damn near perfect movies tho. Also, I think casting is his biggest weakness as a director. Elijah Wood, Marky Mark, Jack Black, Adrian Brody...I think these were all bad choices. Last thing. Wanted to thank InActionMan for that post. Damn good point.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 9:30 a.m. CST

    southafricanguy

    by proevad

    Ebert's review (which I read after I saw it) sums up my feelings on it. Only strength imho is the lead performance by Saoirse Ronan. Stanley Tucci who is usually brilliant is over the top bad (but got an Oscar nod), and Mark Wahlberg gives another one of his smell the fart performances. Those are just two of the SURFACE problems with the film. There is much more to hate.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 9:53 a.m. CST

    TRIG PALIN FOR BILBO

    by THE_CHOPPAH_STRIKES_BACK

    Do I even have to explain?

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 10:02 a.m. CST

    I'd like to kick John McCain

    by proevad

    in his wrinkled old nutsack. He's to blame for bringing this retarded family into every fucking discussion.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 10:29 a.m. CST

    Trig also liked King Kong.

    by THE_CHOPPAH_STRIKES_BACK

    Although he was gravely disappointed by the lack of shit flinging and spontaneous masturbation, as is his wont.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 10:52 a.m. CST

    Ok Choppah

    by proevad

    that brought the funny.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 11:11 a.m. CST

    Proevad

    by THE_CHOPPAH_STRIKES_BACK

    Cheers!

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 11:34 a.m. CST

    79 Days

    by William_Faulkner_Is_A_Ban_Mad_Mod_Sock_Puppet

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 12:46 p.m. CST

    Actually, I'd sorta like to se a Michael Bay Hobbit film...

    by HarryKnowlesNonExistentInceptionReview

    ...just out of curiosity to see a literal cinematic train wreck.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 1:24 p.m. CST

    Imo it's a sadder thing to see MGM fall...

    by workshed

    ...than The Hobbit get green-lit. Has anyone here got a sense of movie history..? I, for one, am going to miss the lion's roar as the lights go down. That used to be a mark of quality.

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 1:55 p.m. CST

    someone should make a movie about the epic struggle of the WB la

    by warrenE33

  • Oct. 9, 2010, 1:56 p.m. CST

    (Cont')

    by warrenE33

    Someone should make a movie about the epic struggle ...of the WB lawyer team.

  • Oct. 10, 2010, 12:14 p.m. CST

    This is so frustrating

    by TV's Frank

  • Oct. 10, 2010, 2:40 p.m. CST

    Yes, but what about the goddamn actors boycott ...

    by ganda1f

    ... thanks to the Aussie Actors guild? Major national news here, and not a peep on AICN.<br><br>It's not the 'greenlight' news I'm disappointed about not seeing, it's commentary about international actors guilds failing to understand NZ law and threatening to kill The Hobbit.

  • Oct. 10, 2010, 9:05 p.m. CST

    King Kong is a racial metaphor?

    by fatjesuschrysler

    Wow! I thought it was just a movie about a big gorilla. Interesting, Tarantino's very suggestion itself sounds a bit racist.

  • Oct. 10, 2010, 9:40 p.m. CST

    the punctuation is killing me

    by chifforobe

    Like, omigod-- the puncuation in these things? It's fucking brutal. The writing style of the authors and contributors? Makes preteen girls sound like fucking Dickens. Yet AICN is quoted in trailers for real movies. Worst. Prose. I've. Ever. Read. I don't think anyone here could put together a coherent essay to save their lives, and I'm running out of reasons to subject my eyeballs to it. Have fun folks, srsly.