Ain't It Cool News (
Movie News

Quint takes a look at LET ME IN from Fantastic Fest 2010!

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. When is I saw the original LET THE RIGHT ONE IN I walked into the theater one early morning at Fantastic Fest knowing nothing about it other than the title and that it had played a couple of other fests and people were saying it’s a must see. In fact, I thought it was a ghost story. I couldn’t tell you exactly why, but the title sounded like a ghost movie to me. The reason I’m calling back to the first film is twofold. I’m in the camp that it is unfair to be asked to separate a remake from the original… that kinda comes with the territory of remaking a good film, just as adapting a good book… If the movie does something different, shifts the focus significantly or improves upon the original film then the comparison won’t hurt, only help. Look at everybody’s favorite examples of remakes… John Carpenter’s The Thing, The Maltese Falcon, The Wizard of Oz, 3:10 To Yuma, etc, etc. Each one stands on its own, but brings a totally different (and sometimes better) perspective to the material. My second reason for discussing the original is because when I saw it I knew nothing about the story and there was zero chance that Matt Reeves’ film could have the same impact, no matter how good it was, simply because I know what’s around the next corner at every point. There have been very few films that I’ve seen cold in my adult life that ended up being my one of my all time favorite films… in fact, there are only two that come to mind. One was Alfonso Cuaron’s CHILDREN OF MEN and the other is LET THE RIGHT ONE IN.

Going in to Matt Reeves’ take on John Ajvide Lindqvist’s you have to put yourself in an almost play-like mindset. Sure, everybody knows what happens in Hamlet, but damn what a great performance by Laurence Olivier! The great strength of Reeves’ movie are the fantastic performances he gets out of Kodi Smit-McPhee, Chloe Moretz, Richard Jenkins and the whole cast. It’s a beautifully shot movie, filled with great actors, a haunting score and gets right everything that needed to gotten right in adapting this for the English speaking audience that can’t stand subtitles. The problem is that Reeves’ personal flourishes and additions to the original film count for less than 20% of the runtime, with the rest of the movie being almost scene for scene. There are additions that work like gangbusters, like the filling out of the back story between the young girl vampire and her protector and Reeves’ decision to Charlie Brown Owen’s parents by not showing his mother’s face at all and only hearing the father over the phone. The way Jenkins hunts for Abby is also an addition that I’d say is an improvement just because of the way Reeves shoots it. There’s more tension, the actual filmmaking is more dynamic and fluid and Jenkins is flat out a better actor than the original guy. But other than those moments the movie struggles to keep pace with the original, often times falling way behind the mark. The biggest offender is the sadly misplaced rubber human effects whenever Abby vamps out. No one will mistake Let the Right One In for being a showcase for CGI effects (the cat scene is always mentioned), but the effects never got in the way of the emotional reality or tone like they do here. Abby looks like she ran away from Blade 2 when jumping all over the place. Those effects absolutely work in Blade, but Blade’s a cheesy action movie. This is not. When Abby looks like the shitty Exorcist prequel possessed girl when shimmying up a tree that’s a distraction. And completely unneeded. It feels like an “Americanization,” added in for the mall crowd in case they’re bored by the movie. Same thing with the new “vampire” effect on Abby. In the original they cast an older woman just for one shot that was incredibly eerie. Here they give her a Regan-like Exoricst make-up and glowing golden eyes. Boo. All conflicts aside, the movie could have been a lot worse. It could have been teenagers all Twilight style. But saying “it could have been worse” is not the mark of a glowing endorsement. There are two things I take away from this film, though. One of them is that Reeves has shown he can do more than found footage style filmmaking. The direction of the movie is assured and there’s real heart put into it. The dude’s passionate about this movie and is starting to craft his own visual identity with this picture. Secondly, the coming of age love story between Smit-McPhee and Moretz is still powerful, which is why you’re seeing some critics really falling for the movie. If that aspect didn’t work the movie would have been a complete write-off, another soulless empty shell of a remake. Because of the fantastic performances and Reeves’ passion for doing justice to the book and original film there’s a lot of focus on this friendship/love story. The foundation is strong, everything is done in an A+ manner, not going for schlocky at any point, but a damn good movie held up to a near masterpiece is always going to walk away the loser. Will this be the overall reaction? Am I only reacting this way because of my crazy love of the original? Well, yeah. This is my experience. The average movie-goer will probably be blown away by this movie and that’s totally fair. Believe me, I’d rather see more genre fare like this coming out of the studio system. This film takes the genre seriously and puts a large amount of focus on the character relationships, so you’re with Owen when he’s bullied and you sympathize with Abby despite her being a monster… perhaps because of her being a monster. It’s a complex issue that goes a little beyond the standard “good or bad” of movie reviewing. For the record, the movie is certainly a good movie, but for fans of the original you could find yourselves like me watching the movie with an unconscious mental checklist running scene by scene. “Oh, it’s time for this scene. That’s pretty good. Oh, it’s time for this scene… the original did it better.” In short, this film is solid, totally top shelf in every department and a giant step forward for American genre storytelling, but it doesn’t add anything to the story which is why I don’t know if I could consider it a good remake. It’s a good movie, mediocre remake.

-Quint Follow Me On Twitter

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:02 p.m. CST


    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    fuck d.vader

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:02 p.m. CST



  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:02 p.m. CST


    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    Fuck D. Vader. tard.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:03 p.m. CST

    Do you proof read?

    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    "When is I saw the original". Nice shitty website with errors all over.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:04 p.m. CST

    D. Vader would never...

    by billyhitchcock1

    ....look at anything!!

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:06 p.m. CST

    loved the first one...

    by joker40

    waiting for reviews on the second remake

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:06 p.m. CST


    by billyhitchcock1

    ...memyselfandcuntface is at it again!!! :-) he's taking on all comers. D. Vader-ites and AICN staff alike! just who's side is he on?! :-)

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:06 p.m. CST

    D vader sucks off his dad

    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    thats why he never looks at anything.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:06 p.m. CST




  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:07 p.m. CST

    Im on my side

    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    Because d vader and the staff are both retarded. eeeooorrr. count me in. NYan!

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:08 p.m. CST

    No one in hollywood

    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    knew that LET THE RIGHT ONE IS is a book so no one went to source material.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:10 p.m. CST


    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    Or shaved? Lets see the cunt you been trying to get into but your cock aint cool enough, just to small.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:14 p.m. CST

    Let the right one in is an excellent film...

    by Father

    ...but im not too cut up over the idea of an american remake. Let the right one in could be set in a variety of places because its themes of loneliness , vampires and creepy kids are universal. Having said that though, i doubt that let me in will be any where near as good as let the right one in.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:20 p.m. CST


    by Nice Marmot

    I was never against the remake. Open minded all the way. But if there's going to be a remake, there is NO FUCKING EXCUSE for shitty CGI. It supposedly has all the heart and all kinds of positives going for it and they still have to throw a bone to the average, retarded American teens and tweens. FUCK . . .

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:24 p.m. CST

    Let me In

    by D o o d

    let me Out!<p>Quint you fancy making any comment on Mr Beaks outrageous behaviour..?

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:25 p.m. CST

    dont ban me plz lol

    by ORIONgods

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:29 p.m. CST

    I've heard that...

    by Orbots Commander

    ...the remake ditches all the Oscar/Owen as creepy, budding serial killer like the book and the original film hinted at (right from the opening shot in Alfredson's movie).

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:36 p.m. CST

    I hate vampires that suddenly sprout...

    by HarryKnowlesNonExistentInceptionReview

    ...left over Star Trek foam latex foreheads and contact lenses whenever they "vamp-out." There's no other reason for it besides, "Hey, this'll look freaky, the kids eat that kinda shit up." Either the vamps look like humans all the time, or have shitty makeup and Halloween contact lenses bought from a dubious Arab at a gift shop on Myrtle Beach... all the time. Sorry for the rant, but it's a pet peeve.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:37 p.m. CST

    D.Vader is the new Gandhi!

    by quicksilver80

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:44 p.m. CST

    Gandhi was booted from a website...

    by LordPorkington

    For being a prick on an obit talkback? I don't seem to recall that happening in real life. And I don't know why people are defending DVader. Yes, there's freedom of speech, but there's also showing a bit of respect to the deceased, whether you know them or not. Hiding behind a talkback name doesn't give you the right to be a total cock. By all means, rip into each other, but have some dignity on the obit talkbacks, it isn't too much to ask.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:49 p.m. CST

    Oh well,here's hoping that..................

    by RoarsLoudly

    The Thing prequel wont be a "shot by shot" of the Carpenter classic!

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:49 p.m. CST

    I bet this versions ditches....

    by HarryKnowlesNonExistentInceptionReview

    ...everything even slightly "controversial". But... the "Mommies 4 Jeebus" groups will STILL get a bug up their asses, anyway. That's the difference between the US and Europe. In Europe, they exiled all their murderous, nutcake religious groups (unfortunately, the exiled them HERE) and so today, only a measly 5% of the population claims to be religious.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 2:55 p.m. CST

    From what I've heard...

    by quicksilver80

    D.Vader wasn't being a prick...there are worse trolls and spamabots who do deserve the banhammer.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:04 p.m. CST

    From what I heard D. vader fucked harrys wife

    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    and all he got was lousy ban.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:04 p.m. CST


    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    has asain wife. I wonder how me he paid to bring her over here.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:04 p.m. CST


    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    has asain wife. I wonder how me he paid to bring her over here.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:06 p.m. CST

    BAN ME so I can keep coming back since I have a

    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    automatic IP number changer. Changes can happen from every few mintues to once a day.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:16 p.m. CST

    The original was good, NOT a "masterpiece"

    by MelGibsonsRacialTirade

    I think we as Americans have a bit of a ego complex when it comes to film making. Often times we believe that no one outside of the US is capable of making a decent movie, so when it happens we freak out and proclaim it the greatest thing we've ever seen. Let the Right One In is very good, but far from a masterpiece. It has flaws, most of which involve questionable dialogue, acting, and editing. With that said, I'll never see "Let Me In" because it's merely a studio cash-in. I have no reason to see it.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:20 p.m. CST

    great review

    by bubbatwo420

    couldn't agree with Quint more on this one, saw it last night and have been telling everyone these exact issues with it. 60% of the same shots/dialogue, crappy CGI, kid actors seemed like they were reading lines. great movie only if you haven't seen original.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:25 p.m. CST

    The original film.....

    by Kizeesh

    Wasn't all it's cracked up to be. The child actors were good but it was painfully slow, repetative and the vampire mythos was very tired and uninvolving. In fact the only interesting concept, (choppy-cock boy) was .... sugically removed from the remake, when it was only very briefly hinted at in the original.<p> This may be a fair movie but it's still working from a point where it's getting critical wanking off for no good reason.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:35 p.m. CST

    Nice Marmot

    by frozen01

    Exactly. I was all over this movie until I heard "crappy CGI". But then again, people really liked Buffy and the vampire make-up in that was worse than crappy CGI any day of the week, so maybe I'm just being too harsh.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:38 p.m. CST

    Nice Marmot

    by frozen01

    Exactly. I was all over this movie until I heard "crappy CGI". But then again, people really liked Buffy and the vampire make-up in that was worse than crappy CGI any day of the week, so maybe I'm just being too harsh.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 3:46 p.m. CST

    The Original Film Blew Goats

    by BilboRing

    It was soooooooooo dull and boring. The "twists" and "moments" did nothing for me. Just did not like the movie.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 4:01 p.m. CST

    The Movie That Loves Getting Reviewed.

    by ThroughTheBrokenWindowWithDancinDelroyLindo

    Not to sound surly, but is this the tenth "Let Me In" review that has been posted on this site? Sweet Fancy Moses! I was unaware that the interest was so high for a movie most of us have already seen in its initial incarnation anyway. Oh, and these fucking "Social Network" pop-up ads on every website in existence are the most annoying thing ever. Very much looking forward to this movie going away. Oh, and fuck Facebook.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 4:05 p.m. CST

    So if I never saw the original...

    by Logan_1973

    I might like this? Good God you AICN reviewers can't be objective to save your lives.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 4:16 p.m. CST

    I think I'm sold.

    by blackwood

    I really liked the original -- liked, not loved. I didn't have the benefit of going in blind. It's a weird thing, because without all the chatter I might never have seen it, but after so much hype on it it didn't floor me like I had hoped. Still a great film. I only saw it the once, though, and wouldn't rank it as my favourite -- important, maybe, and refreshing, and deeply, deeply creepy. But like, not love. So the more I hear on this the more I warm to it. I still despise the idea of remaking a film so close to the release of the original, but I'll see it.<p>Also, the first poster is terrible. TERRIBLE. They really should have used the Olly Moss one.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 4:18 p.m. CST

    Let The Children In

    by IwatchMovies

    Overrated B movies that were bore-fests.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 4:42 p.m. CST

    Still gonna see it

    by NippleEffect

    judge for m'self

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 4:54 p.m. CST


    by billyhitchcock1

    ....that troll hunter talkback is screwed!!! that devin guy is really disliked! and i have no idea who he is. D. Vader fo' life.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 4:54 p.m. CST

    "Let Me In," says D.Vader

    by Guy Who Got A Headache And Accidentally Saves The World

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 5:11 p.m. CST

    Tennant's Hamlet blew Larry's out of the tub

    by zacUpquark

    Go watch David Tennant (and Patrick Stewart) in Hamlet. Then, give a try to even SITTING THROUGH the Olivier version. Oh, and I'm interested in seeing how Let Me In does the "pool scene". I've never seen a better left-to-your-imagination scene in ANY movie.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 5:12 p.m. CST

    Original was not all that great

    by davywankenobi

    It was soooo boring in many spots. If being Americanized means they cut out 20 to 30 excrutiatingly boring minutes, then I'm all for it. Cue insults of my intelligence by rabid defenders of

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 5:28 p.m. CST

    I like Blade...

    by Baryonyx

    ...and I don't think that it was 'a cheesy action movie'. That first Blade film had a lot of style.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 6:04 p.m. CST

    So, er, lemme get this straight....

    by TommyGavinsEgo

    ... Vader got banned for asking a question fairly (NOT being a prick, AT ALL, as some seem to think) in an obituary talkback ... <p> <p> ... but Ain't It Fucking Going Downhill Fast News welcomes with open arms Devin Faraci... who infamously made a fucking horrible joke on Twitter about a four year old girl, mere hours after her tragic death, only to follow it up with a half-assed apology, then ANOTHER joke. <p> <p> Excuse me if the moral compass of this place seems a little bit fucked. <p> <p> And yes, I would've posted this is another talkback, but that dude nuked the shit out of it with zeroes and ones. Normally I'd be furious, but I'm kind of enjoying the lunatics taking over the asylum. <p> <p> Harry - your site - your bread and butter, pal, your job, your life's work - is on life support here.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 6:17 p.m. CST

    I just can't get excited about this

    by lv_426

    Let The Right One In was just so perfect a film for its premise.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 6:17 p.m. CST

    "Let Me In" Don't ban me says D. Vader

    by 4we8have15to16go23back42

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 6:45 p.m. CST

    What's wrong with this review...

    by SnootyBoots

    is the notion that 3:10 To Yuma is one of "everybody's favorite examples of remakes." Lots of people hate that movie, Quint.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 7:26 p.m. CST

    Did they really cast an adult for a scene in the original?

    by Sardonic

    I'm guessing that's the part where Eli first gets "hungry" and it cuts to the close-up of her face. I always that part was weird as shit I wondered what the hell they did to her face to make it look that way. How the hell did they cast an actress that looked so much like her?

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 7:57 p.m. CST

    So Quint... is HAMMER back with a bang.?

    by workshed

    That's the most exciting aspect of this film for me; the rebirth of a legend of the Horror genre. Is it the perfect start.?

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 8:09 p.m. CST

    It's time. Remove talkbacks from the site

    by XeRocks81

    Please, it's just useless at this point. And if traffic goes down the drain then at least you'll know why.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 8:37 p.m. CST

    "Written for the screen and directed by MATT REEVES"

    by Robots In Das Guys

    So fucking annoying. We get it, you want to separate yourself from Cloverfield and be an "artiste".

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 8:49 p.m. CST

    Reeves VS. Found Footage Film-making


    "Reeves has shown he can do more than found footage style filmmaking." Really? A virtually scene-by-scene remake is a big breakout? Sounds like he found an entire film to me.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 10:13 p.m. CST

    You can't judge this type of remake for being too much like the


    This isn't a remake of a well known or classic American film, that is trying to cash in on an already established audience. It's made for people who have no desire to watch a small foreign film. Most of the people who see this at the theater will likely not even know Let the Right One In exists. It's not trying to reinvent the story, but bring it to a wider audience of everyday retards who refuse to watch a subtitled film. Just like a book adaptation for people who wouldn't read a book to save their lives. Personally I thought the original was good, but a little over-hyped. I'm curious to see what sort of style Reeves has making a "traditional" film.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 10:14 p.m. CST


    by D o o d

    On the one hand I understand where you're coming from as it does seem off topic, but seriously man. It is Beaks who is being a douche. I read the messages D.Vader wrote, Beaks was completely out of order to ban him. Just cause he's a little fanboy doesn't give him the right to just ban someone from the TB's. There are MUCH worse things being said on these TB's.<p>I'm not saying you're wrong for demanding an end to this, but it's about the principle man and Beaks needs to step up and be a man about it!

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 11:06 p.m. CST

    'the English speaking audience that can’t stand subtitles.'

    by quantize

    ie the fucking retards

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 11:07 p.m. CST

    'Original was not all that great' = revisionist drivel

    by quantize

    It's a mordern horror classic, if you don't get that your taste is firmly embedded in your ass.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 11:15 p.m. CST

    I've tried to watch LET THE RIGHT ONE IN

    by Ye Not Guilty

    It just puts me to sleep every time I try to stream it on Netflix. I guess the director should have dreamed bigger.

  • Sept. 30, 2010, 11:43 p.m. CST


    by reflecto


  • Oct. 1, 2010, 12:32 a.m. CST

    Yeah, I don't get that dumb fucks on here that think Let The Rig

    by elgato73

    is anything but a masterpiece. It's one of the greatest, if not THE, greatest vampire film ever made and for those who chafe at that go fuck yourselves. Saw Let Me In tonight at a press screening and it was good but nowhere near the level of the original--7/10 for me. Had the subtlety of a sledgehammer too. Everything about the original was subtle and utterly sublime. Reeves did a fine job at moments it felt force and too by the numbers. For all the people who have not the seen original, this remake will make ton of money though.

  • Oct. 1, 2010, 1:04 a.m. CST

    'It just puts me to sleep'

    by quantize

    bigger brain needed at your end. <b> No boom boom crash, no wakey..

  • Oct. 1, 2010, 1:07 a.m. CST

    If you don't like Let the Right One In

    by D o o d

    then you're not a dumb fuck or anything else. It's just not to your taste and you will probably like the hollywood remake. However, Let the Right One In is an incredible film that was shot with a lot of heart. The cinematography, the actors, the script. It is a very intelligent film and requires patience which is why you may enjoy the matt reeves version more.

  • Oct. 1, 2010, 5:42 a.m. CST


    by HongKongCavalier

    I'm in the camp that it takes more talent to create your OWN story than it does to "give your interpretation" of a story that's already been told ... and told well.<p></p> Ironically, this gets released just days after Congress targets Torrent sites for removal from the Internet (yes, "removal") because this is destined to be a Demonoid download.

  • Oct. 1, 2010, 10:58 a.m. CST


    by D o o d

    $4.80 for every time his name is mentioned in TB's...are you serious..? The son of a bitch is a millionaire right now! I was told by one of these AICN writers that they don't get paid. So that actually isn't true then!<p>From now on I shall call him "He who cannot be named"<p>Going back to D.Vader it isn't about the screen name, you're absolutely correct. It's about the principle man. Why should he lose his screen name because an idiot on AICN banned him for no legitimate reason..? Does "He who can't be named" have a vested interest in that particular talkback. it seems to come across like that. So I for one want AICN to re-instate him as D.Vader and I want "He who can't be named" to give all TB's a formal apology for being a dumbass!

  • Oct. 3, 2010, 11:23 p.m. CST

    Like let me in more than then the original.

    by Warcraft

    Sorry, but the cinematography, directing, acting, music, and pacing, are all superiour to the original. all the people claiming the original is better are just coming off as elitist film snobs that think forgeign films automatically means better than hollywood. quint seems a bit more reserved about it though.

  • Jan. 3, 2011, 12:17 p.m. CST

    Wrong...heres why.

    by IsaacTheRed

    The original is better for the simple fact that the pacing is better the the remake, the whole time i was watching the remake i kept thinking to myself, this feels rushed, the whole story feels rushed, Just like Quint, i enjoyed the original immensely. Im a big fan of Reeves, ive liked everything hes done so far, i even liked the remake, i just think that the pacing is way off, the dialog bothered me sometimes too, what the original did was show the characters emotions in a great way by their faces, not by what they were saying. I will say that if i had not seen the original, i would love everything about the remake, im sure thats what reeves was going for when they made this. Now how many of you have seen the remake and then tried to watch the original, the original will seem slow and not as good. I suggest everyone see the original, of any film at least once before seeing the remake of it.