Ain't It Cool News (
Movie News

Photographic Proof Of Terrence Malick's Crew Shooting In Oklahoma (With Olga Kurylenko)!

Beaks here...

From the good folks at Rockville Magazine, we've got our first glimpse of Terrence Malick's crew shooting in the director's hometown of Bartlesville, Oklahoma on his untitled follow-up to THE TREE OF LIFE. The above photograph was taken at the Indian Summer Festival, where actress Olga Kurylenko mingled with locals, some of whom were asked to sign releases after interacting with the QUANTUM OF SOLACE co-star. Next to nothing is known of Malick's untitled sixth film. It's been described as a "powerful and moving love story", and will be shooting in Oklahoma until November. Along with Kurylenko, the film's cast includes Ben Affleck, Rachel McAdams, Javier Bardem and Rachel Weisz. Malick, who wrote the screenplay, will once again be working with cinematographer Emmanuel "Chivo" Lubezki and production designer Jack Fisk - which is honestly all I need to know. For more photos of the festival shoot, check out Rockville Magazine.

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:11 p.m. CST


    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

    More boring news. Aint it cool?

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:12 p.m. CST

    If AICN goes on se then this flick is going to be reviewed a++++

    by MeMyselfAndNy_aaan

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:19 p.m. CST


    by Bouge76


  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:21 p.m. CST

    Wow, thats a quick turnaround for Malick

    by Kammich

    for a guy thats made 5 movies in a 37 year career, i'd say 2 movies in less than 3 years is pretty good production for Malick. and Olga Kurylenko was awesome in "Centurion."

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:29 p.m. CST

    In the meantime, Beaks, Criterion's THE THIN RED LINE

    by Elston Gunn

    on Blu Ray a week from Tuesday. Like I have to tell you that.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:32 p.m. CST

    Malick is God

    by TenderBranson

    Need to see Tree of Life now.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:36 p.m. CST

    Watched Days of Heaven again this week

    by rosasaks

    It's fucking obscene how beautiful that film looks. Every shot could be a famous painting. <p> Wonder if Malick senses the clock ticking and wants to get busy on a few things.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:41 p.m. CST

    My friend just ran into Malick at a restaurant

    by ufoclub1977

    in Bartlesville and said he was friendly to being recognized. Christian Bale is also there to work on the movie.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:43 p.m. CST

    How did your friend know what Malick looks like?

    by polyh3dron

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:45 p.m. CST

    Big Ben Aff ....


    Slowly working himself back into Hollywoods good books .... Good luck mate, stay low and AVOID any and all blockbusters.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 4:55 p.m. CST


    by ufoclub1977

    That's a great question, he wasn't sure, but the rumors were that Christian Bale was in town, and the restaurant was had uncharacteristically LA looking people in it at the bar hitting on women, and then a balding guy wlaked in with a tall stylish guy... and my friend knew that this was Malick's hometown, and that he was rumored to be in town, so he got the nerve to just walk up and ask " Are you Terence Malick?" and he smiled and answered " I am" or something like that. And my friend told him he was a fan and had Days of Heaven on blu-ray... and Malick was nice about it. Unlike say some others you could ru into...

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 5:08 p.m. CST

    I misread that as pornographic

    by terry1978

    And combined with Olga, I was sorely disappointed at first, but the mention of Malick compensated.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 5:15 p.m. CST

    I thought Bale dropped out?

    by The_Motorcycle_Boy

    And had been replaced by Affleck? <p> Any way, can't wait for more Malick! Any chance we'll see this before Tree of Life... <p> I am gutted that Criterion don't make their Blu-rays region free. What arseholes. I want that Thin Red Line release for the Mickey Rourke scenes alone.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 5:24 p.m. CST

    Most beautiful woman in the world

    by KilliK

    oh yes and Malick is a cinematic god.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 5:44 p.m. CST


    by chewyou812

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 6:11 p.m. CST

    This will see theaters...

    by The Dark Nolan

    Before "The Tree of Life."

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 6:11 p.m. CST

    Anything With Olga in it I'm watching!!!! Yeah she is the most b

    by Professor_Bedlam

    If it has Olga kurylengo in it! The woman of my dreams! I'm watching it! The only actress I will go out of my way to watch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 6:21 p.m. CST

    Pretty sure that Malick has a direct line to God.

    by Knuckleduster

    And whenever he shoots a film, he's like "Yo, Big G, how do you think I should frame this motherfucker?", and then God just shifts the camera to the exact right position and whispers in Malick's ear what lens he should use. And then Malick's like "Hey, how about some lightning in the background there, fella?" And then God changes the weather and the heavens split open and lightning strikes. True story.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 6:39 p.m. CST


    by childerolandusa

    I wouldn't be all that surprised.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 7:12 p.m. CST

    Bets on when we will see this..

    by KevinMuller

    I saw 2013 or 2014

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 7:27 p.m. CST


    by RPLocke


  • Sept. 18, 2010, 7:28 p.m. CST

    zzzzzz 2

    by fxmulder35

    Boring. Malick is an overrated hack. The Michael Bay of the artsy-fartsy crowd.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 7:41 p.m. CST


    by D o o d

    This film is about something that will take over 3 hours to explain with slow pan shots and long boring dialogue. The End!

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 8:16 p.m. CST

    Speaking as a Ukrainian...

    by zinc_chameleon

    You can't imagine how *proud* I feel to see a Ukrainian pass as a Native American. Take that Stalin!

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 8:25 p.m. CST

    What's he shooting on?

    by D.Vader

    All I see on my phone is a small monitor and a focus pull mechanism. Surely he's still shooting on film yes? I just don't see a camera there.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 8:49 p.m. CST

    Malick's films..

    by Wyndam Earle

    look like how life should look. Not how it should BE, but how it should look. All the time. Even when I'm takin a dump.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 8:53 p.m. CST

    Beaks you impertinent pipsqueak

    by Hercules


  • Sept. 18, 2010, 9:04 p.m. CST


    by TheUmpireStrokesBach

    If you hit the link there are a few more larger pics showing the camera they're using. I don't know gear so I can't tell you if it's digital or not. Though I sorta doubt and really hope that's not the case.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 9:32 p.m. CST



    I know what Terrence Malick looks like, and I'm not a CIA agent or anything.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 9:39 p.m. CST



    even shows current photographs of him......fucking idiots.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 9:48 p.m. CST

    I aint seen alla the ones

    by Star Hump

    and I know I gots ta, but Im just a hump. Now I like them other ones however. Saw Spacek and that Sheen fella in some crime stuff run around the blamed country and such, but that New World show was just about the best of em i guess.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 9:59 p.m. CST

    What is wrong with the great Terry?

    by James_Camera_On

    Well, his films don't make money for one thing. Love the man, but that is the truth. There are other problems. He doesn't seems to plan his movies that well. His editing takes longer than most movie production cycles. Since "Days of Heaven," he hasn't been able to just "put the horn down" and close the damn movie. He's always tinkering and reshooting and, of course, editing again. Yes, he's a genius and we are all advised to just let him "gene," but it is starting to get annoying. I never thought I would be critical of the man but lately I'm beginning to think enough is a enough. He makes Kubrick look like a speed demon.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 10:15 p.m. CST


    by J.B.M.A.

    Looks to be a Red One. But very stripped down. The follow-focus has been rigged high above the lens which is slightly unusual. No eyepiece, just the monitor instead which is also very forward mounted. No matt-box or filter tray either, which diminishes it's 'movie' look as well.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 10:40 p.m. CST

    The Thin Red Line got a lot of hatred

    by Excelciyour

    which I felt at the time was totally uneccessary. I love that film - and the extended soundtrack to match.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 10:52 p.m. CST

    Better put some poetry in that thing

    by Star Hump

    like ol' Terry is wont to do. I'll take some wind blowing thru some wheatfields or maybe 2 lovin things holding each other as the sun rises and shit

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 10:53 p.m. CST

    really now

    by Star Hump

    The Thin Red Line was phenomenal. It just was.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 11:03 p.m. CST

    Did he direct Sunshine?

    by RPLocke

    That was pretty boring.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 11:07 p.m. CST

    Kurylenko = BLACK WIDOW

    by BranMakMorn

    Scarlett was fine but Olga was perfect.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 11:11 p.m. CST

    I am going to deliver an epic performance!

    by Ben_Fucking_Affleck

    Because I am

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 11:24 p.m. CST

    Malick's films are terrible.

    by BigTuna

    What an overrated hack. The guy did make two solid films in Badlands and Days of Heaven. But holy fuck, Thin Red Line and that Colin Farrel movie were laughably bad. Enough with the pretentious voice-overs and pretty nature shots.

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 11:40 p.m. CST

    The Thin Red Line is probably my favorite film ever

    by RedJester

    Badlands and Days of Heaven aint too shabby either

  • Sept. 18, 2010, 11:56 p.m. CST

    Days of Heaven: is that the one where Tom Cruise

    by CreasyBear

    drives a NASCAR to the Holy Land for the Crusades?

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 12:22 a.m. CST

    One of my other friends was second unit DP

    by ufoclub1977

    Or would that be third unit? On "Tree of Life", my friend was getting a lot of "nature shots" and time lapse in Texas. shooting with a Red.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 1:08 a.m. CST

    None of you brought up, 'The New World'

    by mistergreen

    While interesting, I can see why it didn't do good business or recognition.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 1:43 a.m. CST

    The New World

    by rosasaks

    Best film of the decade.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 2:05 a.m. CST

    Malick Is Just Puking Them Out

    by Akira Cowabunga

    Must be making up for the time lost between Days of Heaven and The Thin Red Line. No complaint from me, though. I think The New World was his best film yet. In fact, each movie he's made has been better than the previous. So Tree of Life might just make me cum to death.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 2:06 a.m. CST


    by Akira Cowabunga

    Wouldn't know a good movie if it flew up his ass and spun around for half an hour.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 2:32 a.m. CST

    Rachel McAdams, Rachel Weisz,

    by Dennis_Moore

    Olga Kurlyenko. Yes, that's how I'd cast a movie, as well.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 2:33 a.m. CST

    Kurylenko, excuse my momentary

    by Dennis_Moore


  • Sept. 19, 2010, 2:37 a.m. CST

    What's an enko, and why is it curly?

    by rosasaks

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 5:26 a.m. CST

    I live in Tulsa, OK....visiting set soon...

    by LegendarySpartanBlood

    i'm going to visit the movie set in October at some point. I will be taking pics and will try to divulge some interesting info about the movie.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 6:50 a.m. CST

    "Beaks! Herc! Stop that fighting!"

    by L.H.Puttgrass

    (voice cracking) <p> "All I want is PEACE in this HOUSE!" <p> (sniffle)

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 7:04 a.m. CST


    by CreationistTechnophobicManiacs

    For fuck sakes, the guy made ONE good movie back in 1973 (Badlands), another shit one in 78 (Days of Heaven), did NOTHING for twenty years and, for some fucking reason, everyone acted like Jesus Fucking Christ had came back from the dead to Direct The Thin Red Line (1998), which had ALREADY BEEN ADAPTED in 1964. The movie itself was a boring and ponderous piece of fucking shit that added NOTHING to the World War 2 film genre never mind that it was OBLITERATED by Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan the same year.<br> <br>Then the fuckstick sits on his ass for another seven years until unloading the bowel movement known as The New World which was another rancid, coma inducing fucking snoozefest and had some of the most atrocious editing I have ever seen in a major motion picture. Seriously, have any of you watched that fucking trash? There are shots where characters are facing one way before dipshit cuts to another shot where they have turned around and are now looking at the camera. This is Ed Wood level’s of editing from this wanker and yet sars are STILL eager to work with him because of this undeserved reputation he has cultivated as some sort of Kubrickesque master Director when the guy hasn’t made a fucking decent film in almost 40 motherfucking years!!!<br> <br>This really burns my ass because Brian DePalma, who’s only three years older then that shitstain Malick, has made some fucking incredible movies over the years (Carrie, Scarface, Phantom of the Paradise, Blow Out), a fuckload of good ones (The Untouchables, Mission : Impossible, Carlito’s Way), a some shit ones (The Fury, Bonfire of the Vanities, Mission To Mars, Black Dahlia etc….) while also being one of the few true auteur’s/independent filmmakers of the 1960’s and 70’s along side Scorcese and Coppola. But even he can’t get a fucking feature made these days while this cocksucker Malick (who has NEVER made anything as good as DePalma’s best) has a blank check thrown at him and half of Hollywood beating down his door to work with him. That’s just not right never mind that dipshit has never had a hit movie. EVER!!! WHAT!!!THE!!!FUCK!!!

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 8:30 a.m. CST

    Damn, he's shooting on a RED?

    by D.Vader

    Well that's somewhat disappointing.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 9:08 a.m. CST


    by Rebeck2

    I love when someone like you calls a movie like DAYS OF HEAVEN "shit" in the second line of his rant. It means I don't have to read, let alone take seriously, any of the shit he says next.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 9:28 a.m. CST

    Yawn. The guy's movies are emtpy Hallmark cards.

    by Flip63Hole

    And not even the cool modern cards with little digital music players, but the old boring ass cards...

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 10:08 a.m. CST


    by ufoclub1977

    why disappointed? It could be that Red footage has resolution and depth that records a base picture that is arguably more robust than film, and could be manipulated by a talented colorist to look like any known film stock or even something new that has character.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 10:40 a.m. CST

    CAN I just MAIL Malick a $100 money order?

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    That man is a genius. Odd how he is very prolific all of a sudden.Same With Werner Herzog.Whatever the reason, keep them coming!

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 10:53 a.m. CST


    by Knuckleduster

    Couldn't agree more. For me, The New World, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and There Will Be Blood are the best American films of the past decade. I'm really curious about the mention of the Red. Never thought Malick would shoot on digital. Thought Tree of Life would all be shot on 65mm. Maybe seeing Soderbergh's work on the Red for his Che movies made an impression on Malick?

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 11:05 a.m. CST

    plenty of fields to shoot in slo mo in OK

    by HaterofCrap

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 11:14 a.m. CST

    I love Olga

    by Psycho_Kenshin

    Speaking of 007 movies where is the next one? Damn yous MGM, damn yoooooous!

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 12:10 p.m. CST

    DVD Vs. Blu-Ray Comparison

    by HansBubi

    Wow, I highly recommend everyone check out the DVD vs. Blu-Ray screenshots comparison for The Thin Red Line at We've come to expect a Blu-Ray transfer to look at least a little better than the DVD transfer, yet the difference in this case is quite stunning. It makes me feel like I've been watching the movie in the wrong way for however many years. This is one of those rare times when I KNOW I have to re-buy a movie. I have read a couple reviews of the movie's new Criterion blu-ray, and both of them basically said this is one of the best looking blu-rays available, and it will become a demo disc for many that have a nice home theater setup. I am so excited now to get the movie on blu-ray in just over a week.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 1:31 p.m. CST

    Yup. Malick's films are extremely Empty.

    by BigTuna

    Pretty trees get old after a while. His films have little story and are a huge snoozefest. The Thin Red Line was a terrible adaptation of the book.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 1:39 p.m. CST

    I Never Knew...

    by Rebeck2

    There were so many stone cold idiots here at AICN. Here's a hint: if you spend a lot of time calling films without explosions or transforming alien robots "boring"...then you might just be an idiot. That word is always a giveaway.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 2:46 p.m. CST

    I pity the fools...

    by AsimovLives

    ... who can't understand why Terence Malick is asuperior talent and his movies are great. I pity those fools. Poor, poor fools.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 3:29 p.m. CST

    It's disappointing, ufoclub, because...

    by D.Vader

    I've been on lots of RED shoots, and while the footage looks great, it still has that inescapable "HD" look and feel. I'm sure an artist like Malick will be able to make it look so great we wouldn't be able to tell the difference (I'm no expert, but seeing the projects I've worked on, I prefer the film look over the RED). I guess I hoped Malick would be one of the holdout filmmakers continuing to put beautiful images on celluloid instead of a hard drive.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 3:47 p.m. CST


    by AsimovLives

    I was suprised the CHE movies were shot digitally. Specially the second movie, which looks more "photographic". Maybe digital filming has come of age. I'm sure some pleople will still want to shot with film, even if digital becames the norm, like how some people still shoot films black and white in this day of colour cinematography. Or maybe somebody will created a film so good to shoot with that will put digital on hold.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 4:01 p.m. CST

    After The Town Im glad to see Affleck headline

    by IndustryKiller!

    His performance was excellent, talk about compeltely redeeming onself artistically.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 4:27 p.m. CST

    The Town is in first with just under 30 mil

    by RPLocke

    But will tank when Wall Street 2 comes out.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 5:08 p.m. CST

    Jesse James / Robert Ford

    by rosasaks

    The last hour or so of that really comes into focus and I'd say it's as strong as any film I've seen. I do wonder if there are pacing problems getting to that though. Ironically, I think Malick actually told Andrew Dominik that, I read. Is he going ahead with the Cormac McCarthy project? He seems to have difficulty getting films made. Wonderful photography and music and I loved the way the narrator made it feel like a book. Tough trick to pull off.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 5:11 p.m. CST

    etain the centurion killer!

    by JRKerr

    wewt! hot pictures! go aicn go! yay!

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 6:10 p.m. CST


    by ufoclub1977

    The inescapable HD look is escapable when yu have an creative and artistic colorist (as opposed to a technically proficient one that relies on scopes and rules). I've seen how you can apply layers and certain details to mimic the organic "natural" flaws and charactersitics of film, everything from microscopically shifting the frames by one pixel randomly to slight bumps in certain curves on the colors only on certain ranges... it can be made to fool experts! But it takes the talent and creativity. I bet Mallick will spend enough time getting it to look just like he wants. But the film look is just a look.... film stock in itself is such a different looking thing now than it was in the 60's and 70's. In my experience raw RED footage is a very plain looking start. Very real, and very blank. It's not like the canon 5D/&D footage that amateurs love that has crushed color correction built in resulting in Canon's blanket predetermined color aesthetic spreading like zombies everywhere.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 6:43 p.m. CST

    Jesse James

    by HansBubi

    I personally found no pacing issues with the film. I have had a few people tell me it's one of the slowest movies they've ever seen, yet I am intrigued and engaged by every minute of the movie. Some of the slowest, longest scenes are actually the most tension-filled and thoughtful in the movie.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 7:20 p.m. CST


    by BigTuna

    Who says just because someone finds Malick's films "Boring", that they need non-stop action and explosions to be interested? It is possible to like movies that build slowly and tell a good story and still not enjoy Malick's films.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 8:34 p.m. CST


    by Logan_1973

    is hot.

  • Sept. 19, 2010, 11:03 p.m. CST

    One man's gifted visionary...

    by BiggusDickus another man's pretentious ass-hat.

  • Sept. 20, 2010, 12:36 a.m. CST

    Why is it that Malick fanatics

    by D o o d

    think that just because a lot of people don't like malick films then they must like Michael Bay films. News for you guys, Malick isn't the only one making intelligent movies, he's the only one that makes boring ones. I might add his films don't make that much money either due to the lack of interest!<p>I hate to make it a point to you but Inception did very well at the box office and it was an intelligent movie that also engaging without putting you to sleep!

  • Sept. 20, 2010, 2:53 a.m. CST

    Only thing boring about Malick are these talkbacks.

    by Knuckleduster

    Every single time a Malick talkback appears on this site, BigTuna, Dood and BiggusDickus show up and start complaining about how "boring" his films are, with nothing new or insightful to add. I'm starting to think they're the same person. Guys, you don't like Malick films. We get it. Why the fuck are you here? You're like a dog scrathing on a door. It's just the same thing over and over again with you. You've made your statement; you clearly don't have anything more to say. Let it go. Move on. Let those of us who do think the man's a cinematic genius do so. I actually come to these talkbacks to get new info on his films, not to have "boring" and monotonous arguments. <p> rosasaks, Dominik's next film is Blonde, starring Naomi Watts (it's about Marilyn Monroe. I'm very excited). <p> HansBubi, I absolutely agree. I'm completely smitten with every single frame of that film and wanted the experience to last longer as well. Apparently there's a 4 hour cut out there somewhere. We can only hope we'll get to see it one day (just like that 6 hour cut of The Thin Red Line, daunting as it may sound).

  • Sept. 20, 2010, 3:30 a.m. CST

    D o o d

    by TheUmpireStrokesBach

    Still a'trollin the Malickbacks? I understand that you don't like Malick's movies. More power to you, but what's with the insistance on this whole "boring" spiel of yours? Is it because you're anonymous? Makes you lose your perspective towards other people and their own take on certain filmmakers does it? Don't forget we're entitled to our opinions just as much as you are yours. I realized I made a joke at your expense in a previous Malickback and apologized for it. Are you big enough to apologize to everyone for being such a twat? I very much doubt it!<p>Look, I understand being contrary to fish for attention in the talkbacks, I get it. But always in every single Malick talkback? Don't you feel dumb pretending his movies aren't brilliant? Is it really worth it just to get some attention?<p>News for you D o o d, Nolan isn't the only one making intelligent movies, but he's the only one that makes ones that fanboys like because he happened to make THE DARK KNIGHT (otherwise you'd think he was the guy who made FAR AND AWAY or some shit). I hate to make it a point to you but Malick has done just fine at the box office (enough to continue making beautiful films that is) and it was with intelligent movies that are also engaging without "boring" all us adults to tears with a bunch of explosions or transforming alien robots.<p>Oh, and I hope you found this post of mine excessively "boring", completely unoriginal, and childish as fuck, because that's exactly how I feel about every single one of yours.

  • Sept. 20, 2010, 4:59 a.m. CST

    I love Terrence Malick and I also love Michael Bay

    by Joely_Boy

    Both are geniuses in their own right when it comes to framing gorgeous looking shots. So there.

  • Sept. 20, 2010, 1:14 p.m. CST


    by JoeD

  • Sept. 20, 2010, 6:43 p.m. CST


    by D o o d

    I was actually responding to people who make the silly statement that those who don't like malicks films must be stupid as he makes intelligent films. So my response is simply that he may make intelligent films but they are, for me and a lot of people like me, quite boring. I have no issues with slow as I loved the above mentioned film Assassination of Jesse James and many others.<p>I respect the fact that you enjoy his films and wouldn't want to impose my taste on others. I personally, at the end of the day, want value for money. So if I am paying my good hard earned cash, I don't care if the director has amazing beautiful vistas of slow panning obtuse camera angles. If it's there and the movie is good then it's a bonus! Nothing beats an engaging story told well. As for apologising for being a twat, I don't think I was, and if you took it that way then I sincerely apologise!

  • Sept. 21, 2010, 4:50 a.m. CST


    by zhongqui

    welcome to:( http://www. be t t handbag $33 AF tank woman $17 puma slipper woman $30 90X Extreme Fitness System ONLY ONLY 42$$$$$$$