Hey folks, Harry here with a report from Sherlock Jr about and concerning... SLEEPY HOLLOW... a film that he seems to like but says falls short of being great. Personally I'm eagerly awaiting good ol Moriarty's peek at the film. He and I have shared an equaled enthusiasm for the project from the get go. Sigh... Alas... we shall see how it goes then...
Dear Harry,
Just got back from the trade screening of SLEEPY
HOLLOW and will give my thoughts below.
Enjoyed Knowles and Ebert. I had to tape it and the
double Simpsons shows to watch later. We were busy
scaring the shit out of both kids and adults. My 11
year-old and a friend helped me set up our annual
haunted yard and garage for passing trick or theaters.
They got into freezing in position and jumping at the
right time. In past years my kids went collecting
treats the whole night leaving me to operate
everything, answer the door, give out treats and do a
little act around whatever theme I'd created. This
year was fin because they came back early and joined
in the festivities. Hiding behind my favorite mask (a
two-faded Tor Johnson ...on head balanced upside-down
on the other), I too stood perfectly still as visitors
approached. Soon my eyes started to hurt. I wondered
if the latex mask was affecting them. But then I
realized that I was keeping my eyes open wide and
perfectly still so as not to move a muscle. It was
causing eye strain. Finally I remembered, they can't
see my eyes...which are hidden behind this huge mask.
Duh.
Sherlock Jr.
SLEEPY HOLLOW
Every time a new Tim Burton project is announced, I
get excited about it. They always sound wonderful and
promise a totally unique cinematic experience. On the
latter, I am not disappointed. A Burton film will look
incredible and unlike anybody else's work. But upon
delivery, something seems to fall apart. I still enjoy
the films but usually am sorely disappointed.
His first short, VINCENT is a near perfect animated
piece about a little boy who wants to grow up to be
Vincent Price (could it be autobiographical?).
FRANKENWEENIE is a great concept, looks amazing but
stretches out way too long. 15 minutes would have been
wonderful but Burton couldn't fill 27 minutes with a
compelling narrative. PEE WEE'S BIG ADVENTURE was his
first feature and arguably his most successful film
(with ED WOOD) because it accomplishes exactly what it
sets out to do. BEETLEJUICE was lots of fun but felt
padded to the detriment of its total enjoyment (though
I still like to watch it). All I remember about BATMAN
is that I was really hyped going in and totally bored
halfway through it. As expected, it looked amazing but
left me cold and uninvolved. Batman has become a much
darker character than the comic I grew up with in the
early sixties and I appreciate what Burton was trying
to do but it wasn't for me. With EDWARD SCISSORHANDS
he got to work with V. Price and much of this fairy
tale was truly magical but it bogged down at several
points. His collaborations with Henry Selick,
NIGHTMARE BEFORE XMAS and JAMES AND THE GIANT PEACH
are as unique to animation as his other films are to
live action though again they fail to maintain
interest throughout. With a strong script and
compelling subject matter, ED WOOD stands on its own.
More traditional in narrative structure that his other
works, Burton shows a depth previously only hinted at.
As MARS ATTACKS approached, I couldn't wait, despite
insider gossip that it didn't work. At a packed
advance screening I sat with my mouth wide open. I saw
things that blew me away. But I was also aghast at the
mess of a story line.
So I clearly have a love-dislike relationship with
most of Burton's work. Based on the trailer and
better-than-most website, I have allowed my enthusiasm
for SLEEPY HOLLOW to convince me that this would be
the perfect Burton film.
The screening room had 4 times more people than usual
at these things, though few seemed to really be in
"the business." The fans were there.
SPOILERS!!!!!!!! WARNING!!!!!!! BEWARE!!!!!!!!!!!
The film opens with a breathtaking pursuit of
Martin Landau (unbilled) resulting in the (off-screen)
loss of his head. We get into the action without
hesitation. Cut to New York, 1799 on the eve of a new
millennium (reminding us that people have gone through
this before). Ichabod Crane (Johnny Depp) is longer
has the occupation of Washington Irving's story
(though advance Paramount info led industry service
EDI to say "a small-town schoolmaster who proves his
bravery to a young woman by vowing to travel a road
said to be haunted by a headless horseman..."). He
handles criminal investigations and is being sent
upstate to Sleepy Hollow where a trio of beheadings
have occurred. Like so many of Burton's lead
characters he is an eccentric creative type, having
invented numerous odd-looking instruments to assist in
his work. No sooner than Crane arrives than more
beheadings occur, each more startling and graphic. The
towns people are an odd lot with possible in-breeding.
Crane alternates from being fearless in pursuit of
the mysterious perpetrator of violent deaths and
fainting. Katrina Van Tassel (Christina Ricci) is
immediately attracted to him but doesn't get involved
until her beau (Caspar Van Dien) loses his head. In
fact just about everybody with a speaking part will be
silenced before long. Crane bravely goes looking for
the horseman and finds a shock at the tree of death in
one of the movie's more intriguing scenes. At about
this point in the movie a subplot is introduced which
explains why the horseman is headless and why he needs
to collect all these other heads. It involves
witchcraft and is only partially successful as a story
thread (though it is interesting to compare to
extremes that SLEEPY HOLLOW and BLAIR WITCH
represent). Action picks up taking us to the happy
ending.
I loved watching as always. The mood and art
direction are knockouts. But the pattern of my concern
(discussed above) happens again. The narrative plods
along, never really uninteresting but hardly
compelling. At nearly 2 hours, I wanted to nod off. As
a 90 minute film it might have had the punch needed to
make it much better. Depp and Ricci seem flat,
especially compared to some strong, if over-the-top
performances from Miranda Richardson, Michael Gambon,
Jeffrey Jones and Michael Gough. The tree effects are
good and the sight of the horse and rider leaping
forth is amazing. The latter beheadings are
convincing. Danny Elfman's music sets the mood but I
didn't find it distinctive.
This is nit-picking but with the attention to
visual detail, there is a major continuity flub where
Depp becomes covered in blood and then jumps on a
horse in hot pursuit...with a washed clean face.
Hmmmm. I also felt Burton would love to make a 3-D
movie. Several scenes involve stuff being thrown at
us. Can you imagine Burton doing a featurette for
IMAX 3-D? That would be something. Short and too the
point.
Burton gets to work with child-hood horror hero
Christopher Lee in an uneventful scene as a judge and
Michael Gough in a small but memorable role.
This is really a Scott Rudin production but
American Zoetrope and Francis Ford Coppola are
credited as executive producers. I don't think FFC had
any involvement in the film but must have once held an
interest in the project. Burton also became friends
when he did post-production on MARS ATTACKS at
Zoetrope in San Francisco (as well as when NIGHTMARE
and JAMES were made in SF).
I feel like I'm leaving out some thoughts I had
during the film but you get the point. I wouldn't have
missed it for the world. I'm just sorry it wasn't up
to the standard I want to set for Burton. The film is
certain to open very well with only the Bond as
serious competition. Teens are intrigued by the
trailer and TV spots and they have continued to
support horror this year. It is a great alternative to
hanging around the house during Thanksgiving weekend
though END OF DAYS will be strong competition then.
None of the above should keep Burton and horror
fans from going. You'll get some thrills, great mood,
a few possible shivers and some uncomfortable laughs
when it is uncertain if that reaction is expected from
the audience. You just won't get the great gothic
horror film you expected.
|