AICN COMICS Q&@: Prof Challenger talks JLA with James Robinson!
@@@@ What the #$%! is AICN COMICS: Q&@? @@@@
AICN COMICS: Q&@ is our new semi-weekly interview column where some of your favorite @$$Holes interview comic bookdom’s biggest, brightest, newest, and oldest stars. Enjoy this latest in-depth interview filled with @$$y goodness and be sure to look for more AICN COMICS as we gaze into the future of comics every week with AICN COMICS: SPINNER RACK PREVIEWS every Monday and then join the rest of your favorite @$$Holes for their opinions on the weekly pull every Wednesday with AICN COMICS REVIEWS!
Q’s by Professor Challenger!
@’s by JLA writer James Robinson!
Greetings, Professor Challenger here. While Bug is sunning himself in SDCC, the rest of us @$$Holes are still hard at work. I had a chance to talk with James Robinson about his recent run on JUSTICE LEAGUE OF AMERICA. Here’s what Mr. Robinson had to say.
JAMES ROBINSON (JR): I have a lot of ideas for arcs and stories. How long exactly? Not sure, but I counted out my ideas and realized I have about three to four years worth of stories. Whether I tell them all depends on how the readers respond to what I'm doing of course.
PROFESSOR CHALLENGER (PROF): First of all, as someone who jumped onto the current JLA book when you came on it, how long do you plan on staying?
PROF: Your style of writing is one of various dialogue narratives throughout the book. In fact, many times you have 2 or 3 or more commenting on the action in their heads. It's an interesting approach (and in a handful of active sequences potentially confusing as to who's "voice" I'm hearing) and from a technical standpoint I am curious about your thought process in deciding to approach this series in this way, say, rather than just the standard omniscient narrator and dialogue balloons for the reader.JR: I wanted to try something different. I wanted something that would help to identify these JLA adventures as mine. I don't agree they're confusing, in that we take a lot of care making sure the captions are sufficiently different. I hope they're clear enough, anyway. I like the way the captions afford me the opportunity to show ironic contrast between what one character is thinking and another. I know some readers don't like them, but others do. I'll continue with this approach for the time being at least.
PROF: Can you share a little about the creation process between you and artist Mark Bagley? Do you just send off the script and a few weeks later are pleasantly surprised by what you see or is there more communication and collaboration here between the two of you?JR: It's some of the former and some of the latter. Yes, it's a full script, but Mark and I talk often about this idea, or that visual. It definitely feels collaborative.
PROF: Speaking of Bagley, in that first arc where you featured, I guess I would describe them as, a twisted villainous version of the core New Gods characters, did he design the look for the new characters on his own or did you already have in mind the look?JR: I gave him some thoughts on their look, but Mark then went off and came up with his own take on them. I'm particularly partial to the design of Hunter the villainous version of Orion.
PROF: It seemed to me that after the first story arc that your planned line-up for the book somehow got intruded upon...most notably the removal of Green Lantern, Green Arrow, Starfire and Mon-El. Was that always part of your plan for the book or did events in the other DCU titles dictate their removal from the team?JR: The JLA is a book that must always allow for the events of the DCU proper that are going on around it. Yes, I did have the rug pulled out from under me, by having this mass exodus of characters happen due to events in other books. I confess I hated losing Mon-El. But in the end I think the book is better for it now, with the team having a better core group and I get to use Supergirl who I'm having a lot of fun with. You can bitch and moan about these kind of things, or you can get on with it and try to work with what you have.
And some characters you haven't seen the last of. You'll definitely see more of Cyborg and Dr. Light in the future. Incidentally Dr. Light has become a favorite of mine, even though I haven't written her much.
PROF: To me, one of the aspects of the DCU that connects with me is the legacy aspect of the heroes. JSA was the first series to fully embrace that concept, but your approach to the JLA seems to be a legacy-based approach, which I fully endorse at this point. This develops a JLA that truly is the first adult next-generation membership for a Silver Age team (Batman/Dick Grayson, Donna Troy, Jade, Jesse Quick, Supergirl). Is this an intentional plan on your part to establish a new legacy team or is this just a nice synchronistic result?JR: Absolutely. It was something that Geoff and I came up with as we planned what the future of my JLA would be. I like that these characters have graduated to the big time. I like the legacy aspect, that while definitely that, somehow feels different to me from the legacy feel of the JSA. I think you'll see more of that playing out too in the arcs to come as we witness the heroes interacting.
PROF: Congorilla has become a favorite character for me. His old-school attitude and "seen it all" steady hand is surprisingly effective. But this is not a character who's really ever been one known for actual "super-heroics." What drew you to such an obscure character and this desire to put him face front like this (not to mention adding in a few powers we've never seen before with his character)?JR: He was a holdover from CRY FOR JUSTICE. He's definitely a concept you either love or hate. I love the fact that there's a giant magical golden gorilla in the JLA. I'm also happy I've given him the ability to grow in size too, it allows me to have him be King Kong when he has to be. As the series progresses he'll be dropping references to things he's done in the past. Never in a chronological order though. However by the time I'm finished, any reader who cares to will be able to go through all these references and put them in order and get the life story of Congo Bill. I'll say now that he was born in Scotland in 1895, the son of a gamekeeper.
PROF: Similarly, of all the "Starmen" to add to the team, why this version? What about Mikaal made him seem right for the JLA but not any of the other potential "Starmen"....or even a new version?JR: Why Mikaal? After Jack, he's the one I've had the most dealing with. Mikaal had appeared in one issue of FIRST ISSUE SPECIAL before I came along, so all his character development is mine from my run on STARMAN. I like the fact that he's gay, and without making it into a huge event, I'm going to enjoy giving him a new relationship when the time is right.
PROF: Do you have any thoughts on the appeal of the "Starman" name and why it has been utilized so much?JR: It's a golden age character that I was lucky enough to get my hands on at a time when no one had thought to create a legacy out the name. Yes, there were a lot of Starmen before Jack Knight, but for some reason the idea of linking them up hadn't been done up to that point. I got to do that. As you say, legacy characters are a part of the DCU.
PROF: The current JLA/JSA team-up deals with Jade's return. What is it about the interaction between these 2 teams that you find particularly interesting as a writer?JR: It was challenging, I will say that. From having my team reduced to a more manageable amount, I'm suddenly swimming in characters again. It's been fun though, mixing this old team with so much history and the new JLA whose history is just beginning. I've definitely enjoyed the challenge of giving every character his moment to shine.
PROF: Are there going to (once again) be changes made to Alan Scott/GL that may lead to a new role for him? I ask because it seems that every few years someone decides that Alan is redundant and mess around with him and then a few years after that someone decides he's not redundant and returns him to his rightful position as Green Lantern. :)JR: I don't want to say too much here. Suffice to say he will have a new role within the DCU, while at the same time he'll be returning to his roots more as well. I think fans who might feel he's lost a sense of direction apart from being one of the dwindling "old guard" will like this direction for Alan Scott while fans of classic Alan Scott/Green Lantern will also like his place in the DCU after the “Dark Things” arc. I will add that Alan Scott is my favorite "golden ager", so I only want the best for him.
PROF: Is Dick going to allow Damian to assume a role in this new JLA, as opposed to Bruce's obvious reticence at including Robin in the JLA?JR: One of the things I like about Damian is that no matter what Batman wants there's a degree where Damian's going to do what he wants instead. Frankly, I don't know what Grant Morrison's plans are for Damian after Bruce Wayne's return, but if he's around I'd love to have him interact with the JLA at least a little bit.
PROF: Ultimately, when the pendulum swings again and the basic Big 7 reestablish as the JLA (hopefully not for awhile), do you see your current version continuing on as a team in some other capacity? Or is that too far ahead to even speculate?JR: That's a little far off to say. This team will be around for a while.
PROF: Finally, is working on the JLA tickling your creative bone to do a THE SILVER AGE mini-series sequel to THE GOLDEN AGE? :)JR: I was developing the SILVER AGE with a big name artist and for one reason and another it didn't happen when it should have. Since then between Mark Waid's JLA YEAR ONE and especially Darwyn's Cooke's NEW FRONTIER, the story I wanted to tell has been told and by better and more talented guys then me.
PROF: Thanks for your time and your work! And thanks again for signing my well-worn copy of THE GOLDEN AGE #1 at C2E2.JR: You’re welcome.
PROF: Look for Mr. Robinson every month in JUSTICE LEAGUE OF AMERICA.“Prof. Challenger” is actually Texas graphic artist and lifelong reader of comics, Keith Howell. He really digs Green Lantern, most recently completed the cover art for the upcoming book THE WORLDS OF PHILIP JOSÉ FARMER, and has contributed award-winning art, design, and editing to a number of books and magazines. He occasionally updates his website at at profchallenger.com and welcomes feedback from readers, both pro and con, but if female please include an attached pic in a tasteful state of undress. Thanks for all the fish.
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
+ Expand All
July 22, 2010, 10:58 a.m. CST
by vic twenty
July 22, 2010, 10:58 a.m. CST
by vic twenty
July 22, 2010, 10:59 a.m. CST
by vic twenty
July 22, 2010, 1:45 p.m. CST
July 22, 2010, 1:53 p.m. CST
July 22, 2010, 3:29 p.m. CST
Now, this rant's mainly about his role in thoroughly undoing his amazing Starman series and mythos from the 90s. <br><br>James Robinson has NO IDEA how to write the Starman characters any more, especially The Shade. I gave him a chance with Starman 81, but my greatest fears were confirmed. <br><br> I have taken a break from him recently, hoping that the new series would redeem him, but I noticed a new image of Shade that confirmed my greatest fears. SHADE IS NOW CONFUSED BY AMERICAN HOLIDAYS? He's lived in the United States more than 100 years. This is just further proof James Robinson has no idea what he's doing these days. He's gaining the lowest common denominator fans now with his piss poor writing. I'm talking fangirls and people who have really no idea what Starman is about, think the OOC romance with Hope is actually endearing, and so on. <br><br> Debate me all you want, but he admitted he doesn't even own the Shade series. I'd be surprised if he even owns Starman 0-80 any more. James has become a grade-A hack and I am sick and tired of him rehashing Starman suddenly, only to grind it to the ground through his rapidly deteriorating storytelling skills. The Starman series I knew and loved is indeed dead, and has been dragged through the death by an tragically inept writer and his remaining, horridly inept, fans. <br><br>Bottom line: FUCK YOU, James 'hack rapist' Robinson. Stay in the fucking United States for your own safety.
July 22, 2010, 4:14 p.m. CST
Jilted fictional-reality lover
July 23, 2010, 11:30 a.m. CST
First, um, wow, what the hell was up with that dude? He really likes Starman, way more than I do, and I thought I really liked it, but I guess I just have a better grasp of reality. Anyway, great interview, huge JR fan way back to the Golden Age and Firearm. JR's first JLA issue gave me hope that JR was back on track tackling the underdeveloped Dr. Impossible, using obscure characters, and introducing new characters and future story lines in simple splash pages, but it was quickly derailed due to all the crossovers. So I hope he is able to steer it back to his original vision and please, please, please, just stay on the book! I'm not saying everything JR has put out since his return from Hollywood has been gold, but the man can still write. Thanks again for the great interview.
July 25, 2010, 9:10 p.m. CST
Thanks for the positive feedback. I thought Robinson presented himself very well to my questions and I will continue to buy this series. I am enjoying what he's doing with it, but as you can tell from my questions probably, I'm frustrated by what is obviously editorial intervention that is derailing things he has planned almost from the beginning of his run (like, for example, the loss of Mon-El, Starfire, GL & GA). But I must confess to really digging his decision to just veer in a different direction and sub Supergirl and Jade, etc. which has generated its own story ideas. :) Robinson comes off to me like a good employee as well as a good writer. I like him.
July 27, 2010, 7:24 p.m. CST
I just wanted to thank Prof for his thoughtful questions. I enjoyed answering them and would love to do this again the future. To Kontarsky I'll say this -- you may not like my work, but as the Shade would say "it costs nothing to be a gentlemen". There's no need to insult me and use the F-bomb, man, show some class. Furthermore, the Shade remark you reference from Cry For Justice was clearly made in humor very much in the spirit of the character I wrote for eight years and pretty much defined as the character he is today. Of course the Shade knows American holidays as do I. You can get angry some more in my up-coming Shade maxi-series when he mis-spells Woodrow Wilson's name and gets the year of his inauguration wrong. And lastly, hacks don't care about what they write. My abilities may be dubious, but I do care very much about my work. Anyway, to Prof, thanks again and I hope all is well.
July 31, 2010, 2:52 a.m. CST
..if there was a decent penciller on it. I'm sorry, but the winner of the 80's "Marvel Try Out" contest isn't the guy who should be drawing what SHOULD be DC's flagship series. And I don't mean because he started at Marvel..I mean because he draws everyone like they have Down syndrome. It would be nice for Mr. Robinson to be able to utilize some bigger guns on this books. I think Grant Morrison rather proved that you NEED those "Super-Friends" to make the JLA work. Now if only Didio would retire and let Morrison and Giffen run the editorial...<sigh>...sweet jesus that'd be great.
- THE HOBBIT: THERE AND BACK AGAIN Is Now Called... -- 173 total posts 173 posts
- Behold The Greatness Of IMAX's GODZILLA Poster!! -- 83 total posts 83 posts
- Meet Jon M. Chu's JEM AND THE HOLOGRAMS!! -- 45 total posts 45 posts
- BARBIE. The Movie. -- 174 total posts 44 posts
- Check Out the Trailer for EJECTA - From PONTYPOOL Scribe Tony Burgess! -- 38 total posts 31 posts