Well, as conciousness slowly begins to fade... I must leave you with this... the latest of rumblings from beneath the very feet of those that create and destroy in the city of angels and the land of Holly. Here's the old man himself.... Moriarty....
Hey, Head Geek...
"Moriarty" here.
Slowly but surely, the henchmen are emerging from
their hiding spots, returning to their posts, and
getting back to the basic business of the Moriarty
Labs. That's not to say I'm over FIGHT CLUB. Far
from it. The film keeps sinking in. I expect that my
thoughts on the film will develop even more after I
see it this Friday night at the Cinerama Dome. I
don't get to go to that theater nearly often enough
thanks to their almost insanely bad booking policy, so
it gives me almost limitless joy to picture seeing the
film there with an opening night audience.
One of the most fascinating things about the movie for
me is the fact that it's almost a litmus test in film
form. What you take away from FIGHT CLUB will depend
in large part on what you take into FIGHT CLUB. I
have noticed a generational shift going on in the
basic power structure of Hollywood lately, one that is
reflected in other industries as well, and I saw that
concept played as dark satire in the film. Harry
walked away viewing the film as a piece about
society's emasculation of a certain age group and the
efforts of those men to reclaim their birthright, an
idea I think is fairly central to him based on his own
accelerated adulthood. I've heard the film called
both pro- and anti-violence, and I can see how either
side could be argued. I think it's okay to be scared
silly by the film, and I believe it's also okay to be
exhilarated by it, to let it pump you up. In the end,
it is undigested art, something that demands that you
participate. As much as I loved AMERICAN BEAUTY or
THREE KINGS, neither one of those films leaves much
room for you, the viewer, to interpret the characters
or react to the story. FIGHT CLUB, on the other hand,
refuses to give you the answers. It demands that you
think for yourself. It is challenging in all the
right ways.
I want to also speak specifically to the issue of
violence in the film, since it's one of the things I
didn't cover in my review. Part of that is because
it's a complex issue here. There is a fair amount of
violence in the film, but this is one of the most
responsible depictions of it I've ever seen in a
movie. Anyone who protests the film based on its
violent content simply doesn't understand what they're
looking at. They are unable to process the images and
take meaning from them. All they're reacting to is
the surface, and that's a shame. Like SE7EN, this is
a film of deeply-seeded moral convictions, and it's
one that should be studied by sociology classes just
as much as film classes.
Unlike some of my favorite action/adventure movies
(T2, RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK, THE ROAD WARRIOR), there
is no violence in this movie that is meant to
titillate or thrill in a conventional sense. There's
nothing heroic or glamorous about a single punch
thrown in the film. Instead, Fincher and his
technical collaborators have worked very hard to make
sure that every single punch is felt on a human level.
When someone is beaten to a pulp or choked into
unconsciousness or even, god forbid, shot, it matters.
We are shown the effects. We are forced to confront
it and we are able to project ourselves into it. The
violence is not pretty, and it's not fun. Instead,
it's a wake-up call, something that reconnects these
characters with life. They are forced to feel, and
that seems to be what Fincher is after as well. There
is a gunshot late in the film that is literally mixed
so loud that I thought my ears were ringing
afterwards. It took two viewings before I realized
that Fincher had laid the ringing onto the actual
soundtrack, creating something more realistic than any
gunfire in any Joel Silver movie. Guns are treated as
weapons of destruction in this film, and not just a
penis extension for an impotent hero. They are awful
things, used only when nothing else works. Tyler
Durden isn't a murderer in the film. He wants to
destroy a society that he sees as draining the life
from the best men of his generation, but he's not
willing to crawl across broken, dead bodies to get
there.
When I say in my review that I feel the film is
dangerous, it's because of the concepts hidden within
it. It's because it dares you to think about things
that our consumer society doesn't want you to think
about. Have you ever wondered why your TV is
cluttered with so much garbage? Those endless sitcoms
and game shows and gripping real life dramas and
infomercials and music videos and reruns and wrestling
and sports and cartoons are all just there to placate,
to keep you tuned in. If you never turned your TV
off, if you just let wave after wave of commercial
into your head, then you are playing the game the way
it is built to be played. All you're supposed to do
is go to work, go out for a little safe,
corporate-approved fun, come home, watch your TV, and
sleep. There's not meant to be room for you to go on
any journeys of self-discovery. The emphasis on
beauty over brains in our culture sends the clear
message that bettering your mind is not worth your
time. It will get you nowhere. You can't get laid
because you're smart, or at least that's what
advertisers would want you to believe. Sculpted abs
are the path to happiness. Tune in, shut up, sit
down.
And the film laughs at all of that. It stands
resolutely outside that paradigm, despite the fact
that it cost over $70 million. It attacks those ideas
despite being released by an international media
conglomerate. It refuses that world even though it
stars one of the prettiest men alive. It is a
paradox, and it is well aware of that.
One of my favorite little throwaway lines in the movie
comes when Ed Norton and Brad Pitt are talking about
which historical figures they'd most want to fight.
Norton immediately shoots back with "Gandhi," a line
that gets a massive laugh. It's an inherently funny
thought, but it stuck with me in some ways, especially
as I sat down tonight to view a special little
documentary called IN SEARCH OF KUNDUN WITH MARTIN
SCORSESE. The film, created by documentarian Michael
Henry Wilson, serves not only as a look behind the
scenes of one of Scorsese's best films, but also as a
further investigation of some of that picture's
primary concerns. After all, Martin Scorsese has been
known throughout his career as the creator of some of
the most striking, iconic moments of screen violence.
Who can be exposed to his work without having Travis
Bickle and Jake La Motta permanently burned onto their
own personal hard drives? It's not possible to talk
about MEAN STREETS or GOODFELLAS or CASINO without
also discussing the violence within those films. How,
then, did this filmmaker come to make a movie about
the 14th Dalai Lama, a man whose entire life stands as
a monumental and moving testament to the tenets of non
violence as a practical and possible solution?
Well, that's the film. It's wonderful, featuring
in-depth interviews with Scorsese himself as well as
his screenwriter on the picture Melissa Mathison, his
gifted cinematographer Roger Deakins, and production
designer Dante Spinotti. More importantly, there are
interviews with the Tibetan cast of the film, all of
whom offer a unique insight to their culture and the
importance of not only His Holiness, but the way he is
depicted. One gets a sense as the documentary unfolds
that it's more than just a film to them. This is
their history, and it is still alive, still unfolding.
Rare archival footage of Tibet during the time that
KUNDUN covered also offers a fascinating look at how
well the filmmakers did in their efforts to recreate
the events and the culture.
More than ever, I see this film as a companion piece
to Scorsese's wonderous LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST, a
film that managed to put a human face on the
historical Christ without ever once losing sight of
the divine side of his nature. IN SEARCH OF KUNDUN
gives us a glimpse of the real Dalai Lama, and it
suggests that Scorsese really managed to capture him.
Both films feel like
religious offerings, but to totally different
religions. For one filmmaker to be responsible for
both pictures is truly amazing. If you're like most
people and missed KUNDUN during its initial release,
then do yourself the favor of catching this wonderful
documentary when it opens at the Lammle Monica on
October 15, this Friday. If you'd like to see it with
the director and producer Dale Ann Stieber, you can
try to make the special presentation tonight at the
Laemmle Playhouse 7 in Pasadena. They'll also be
showing it there on Wednesday and Thursday, and it
will be playing soon at the Lumiere in San Francisco
and the San Rafael Film Center in Mill Valley. There
is an impending video release of the film for those of
you who won't get the chance to catch it on the
bigscreen, and you can find out the details of that
release at Hollywoodnt.com.
Another very special, very strange little film that is
getting only limited theatrical exposure before
rushing to video is the Palm Pictures/Manga
Entertainment release PERFECT BLUE. This is the kind
of genre-bending anime that could help redefine what
people in this country think of as "Japanimation."
It's a smart, sophisticated psycho-thriller that plays
like the best, most feverish dreams of Brian De Palma
or Dario Argento. There's no monsters raping
schoolgirls with their tentacles here. Instead, we're
taken on a harrowing journey with Mima, a Japanese pop
idol who tries to walk away from stardom to pursue a
career as an actress, only to find herself stalked.
Or at least, she believes she's being stalked.
Whether she's right or not is one of the film's
central questions, and it plays with levels of reality
in a way that surprised me in its complexity. It's
hard to summarize the film without killing much of
what makes it work, but it's definitely worth seeing
theatrically if possible. I wish I'd had a chance to
warn people about its Los Angeles, New York, Chicago,
or Seattle engagements early, but that time has
unfortunately passed. It's going to finish playing in
Los Angeles this Thursday, at the Laemmle Monica I
mentioned earlier, and I'd advise all hardcore anime
fans to rush out if they can. For those of you in San
Francisco, Berkeley, San Jose, San Rafael, Cleveland,
Austin, Portland, Kansas City, Sacramento, and
Anchorage (!!), there's still a chance for you to see
it if you keep your eyes open in the coming weeks.
For everyone else, write the title down -- PERFECT
BLUE -- and start bugging your local video store about
it now. This is the kind of film we need to support
if we ever want to break the stranglehold of
homogenized animation on the American market.
Speaking of edgy animation, I don't suppose there's
any AICN fans who happened to make an NTSC recording
of Saturday night's MONTY PYTHON 30th anniversary show
on BBC1, are there? I'm a raving Python fan. Have
been since Craig Carver showed me MONTY PYTHON & THE
HOLY GRAIL back in the 5th grade. I'd love to see the
special, even if I hadn't heard about the special
contribution of Trey Parker and Matt Stone. Seems
they are the first people to be allowed to adapt and
reinterpret any Python material since the '70s, when
Python sued ABC and the BBC to claim ownership of all
their sketches. Parker and Stone were allowed to
rewrite the famous "Dead Parrot Sketch" into the soon
to be infamous "Dead Friend Sketch," with Cartman
playing the John Cleese role, Kyle playing Michael
Palin's part, and the one and only Kenny as the
titular "Dead Friend." I would love to see how
they've twisted the material, although I suspect they
stuck pretty close to the original. In a prepared
statement I've seen quoted in several articles now,
Parker and Stone said, "We would do anything for the
Pythons. We would kill ourselves for them, but we
hope this small piece of animation will suffice."
On the opposite end of the scale from edgy sits the
impending release of FANTASIA 2000. I just read the
trailer comments by Big Tex in his article today, and
I'm jealous of him for getting to see the images
projected like that. You can call me Veruca Salt if
you want. Even after all the things I see early and
all the people I meet, I still want more. Thankfully,
I do have one thing that prevents me from turing
bright green right now, and that's the knowledge that
I've already seen big chunks of the film. I haven't
seen it sequenced properly or with everything
complete, so I'm not about to call this a review, but
I will offer a few quick thoughts.
Earlier in the column, I mentioned the Cinerama Dome,
one of my favorite places to see a film. When
FANTASIA was restored and rereleased at the start of
this decade, I was lucky enough to see it at the Dome.
Disney, a co-owner of the theater with Pacific, went
in and put a special sound system into the theater,
creating an astonishing sound field that reproduced
the actual placement of the orchestra instruments. It
was a beautiful presentation of the movie, and it
really made me fall in love with something that I'd
only ever seen in bits and pieces before that. I
suspect the overall impact of FANTASIA 2000 will
depend on presentation, but the bits and pieces
themselves offer a good deal of promise. In
particular, I thought the "Pomp and Circumstance"
segment was a dazzler, both funny and beautiful. I
was worried that the whole Donald Duck/Noah's Ark
concept wouldn't work, but it's done with such
confidence and heart that it erased all thoughts of
how badly Disney's handled their core characters over
the last 20 years. The "Firebird Suite" sequence was
breathtaking even in early storyboard form, and I
found myself really impressed by "The Steadfast Tin
Soldier," especially in terms of the 3D modeling
involved. I only got a glimpse of "Pines of Rome,"
and I saw nothing whatsoever from "Rhapsody In Blue,"
but I have high hopes for both. "Rhapsody" is one of
my very favorite pieces of music, and I can't imagine
there's any way to lessen its impact. If the quality
of the other segments is any indication of what to
expect, they may actually enhance the piece's overall
quality. And those flying whales... well, even a
brief glimpse was enough to send a shock of wonder
through my system. When this thing opens, it's me
you're going to be fighting for tickets. Consider
this a warning.
In a final brief Disney note, I want to strongly
encourage all of you to pass on purchasing the new DVD
edition of WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT? It's one of my
favorite films of the '80s, featuring truly
groundbreaking work by genius Richard Williams, but
I'll be damned if I'll have it in my house. I am
disgusted by the idea of altering films just to
satisfy some misguided sense of protecting kids. This
isn't a frame of a naked woman hidden in THE RESCUERS
we're talking about. This is a PG-rated comedy that
played to both children and adults in equal measure.
For those of you who don't know what was changed, it's
a brief moment near the start of the film, immediately
following Baby Herman's angry outburst. As he storms
off the set, he walks between the legs of a woman,
reaching up under her dress for a moment with his
finger extended as he grins lasciviously and says,
"Hiya, toots." It's a funny, crazy little moment, and
it immediately sets the tone for the picture. They
may be adorable cartoons in front of the camera, but
when cut is called, these 'Toons are just like anyone
else, flaws and all. Disney's defense for their
actions is that they just found the image when they
were able to see it on CAV laserdisc, and they had
never noticed it before.
Hogwash. I noticed it the first time I saw the film,
as did all my friends. It's impossible to miss, as a
matter of fact. I suspect they think this will all
blow over, and if people buy the film, it will.
Unfortunately, it sends a clear message to the
industry that it's okay to rethink films and alter
them on a whim years after their initial release.
When I first brought this issue up a couple of months
ago, hoping to head off the changes, I asked here if
Robert Zemeckis knew about these changes, and I got
several letters from people close to him that said he
was not aware of the plans. Those letters would
suggest that he had been made aware, but the
alteration happened anyway. Did he allow them? Was
he contractually forced to accept them? Considering
the high esteem I have for Zemeckis, both as a
filmmaker and as a person, I have to confess that I am
shocked by these events, and I hope to see some sort
of correction made to future editions of the film.
Hey... I was just looking at the release schedule for
this weekend. Is SCREAM IF YOU KNOW WHAT I DID LAST
HALLOWEEN really coming out nationwide? Did they even
bother advertising it once? I mean, MUSIC OF THE
HEART seems to be sneaking out compared to the nearly
deafening hype for Universal's STORY OF US and Fox's
FIGHT CLUB, but at least there's an MTV tie-in video
for that film and a theatrical trailer I've seen at
least once. As far as SIYKWIDLH is concerned, it's
almost like they're ashamed to be throwing it up there
on screens. Not that I think the film's got the
potential to be anything but an absolute disaster, but
how does Miramax expect to reap any return if they
haven't even made the effort?
I read a really funny development listing tonight for
a film called CHASING THE PARTY, or HOW HUGH HEFNER
CHANGED MY LIFE. It's being produced by Jerry
Bruckheimer, and it's the story of two guys who are
determined to crash a party at the Playboy Mansion,
even as they come to grips with their friendship and
their relationships with their girlfriends. The
film's being touted as a BILL & TED style comedy, and
sounds like it could be light fun. The thing that
really got my attention, though, was that the script
was written by Scott Caan, who's starring in the film
along with his father, James Caan. Well, no wonder
they're going to get to use the Mansion in the film.
If I could be anyone at any point in their lives, I'd
opt to be James Caan in the '70s, when he managed to
land some ridiculous number of Playmates of the Month
in a row over a period of several years. As much as
Hefner in his pajamas, the image of James Caan defines
the PLAYBOY allure for me. He was always the
prototypical PLAYBOY guy, tough as nails, ready to
fight or fuck at the drop of a hat, and cool even when
controversial. I'd love to see how Scott Caan creates
the atmosphere of the Mansion, since his technical
advisor on the film is in such great position to make
it authentic. I have a feeling the film will be worth
seeing for that, if for nothing else.
As regular readers of this column know, I think music
videos can be works of film art all on their own, and
I never hold their three minute lengths against them.
Sure, the vast majority of MTV these days is filled up
with identical boy bands or teenage divas, but the
good stuff sneaks through from time to time. This
past week, I've seen two new videos I thought were
worth mentioning. The first is the latest effort from
the Foo Fighters, one of the best late-'90s video
bands. Dave Grohl and his various directors always
manage to mix the silly and the sincere, much like the
band's music does. After hearing the soundtrack for
Paul Schrader's TOUCH and seeing how well Grohl's
videos all work, I'm surprised he hasn't done more
composition for film. This time out, with "Learn To
Fly," director Jesse Peretz has created a wild
live-action cartoon featuring Grohl and his bandmates
in multiple roles as well as a cameo by the awesome
Tenacious D (Jack Black and Kyle Gass for the
uninitiated). It's a laugh-out-loud funny video, the
direct opposite of Tori Amos' haunting "1000 Oceans,"
directed to great effect by Erick Hergant. You'll
remember the video if you see it. Amos spends the
whole video sealed in a large plexiglass cube on a
city sidewalk as the world goes by outside. It's
beautiful, ghostly, and it's also one of the best
songs Amos has released as a single since "God." In
particular, I find myself recalling the slow motion
riot and the one protestor pressed flat against the
glass, face to face with Tori.
What's the opposite of blacksploitation? That's the
question I keep returning to whenever the commercials
for THE BEST MAN flash by. Harry Lime and I were
discussing the other day that the whole gimmick of
films like THE WOOD and THE BEST MAN seems to be that
there's absolutely nothing out of the ordinary about
them. Look, they seem to scream. Look at how normal
we all are. No guns here. No drugs here. I admire
and support African-American filmmakers in their drive
to make films that aren't immediately labeled as
"urban films" or "black films," but don't we get
enough bland, safe romantic comedies as it is? I'd
much rather see films that don't depend on any one
culture or color for their inspiration than see
material like this. As much as I avoided RUNAWAY
BRIDE, I intend to avoid THE BEST MAN.
This brings me to my final item of the week, a review
of a new film that features a spectacular supporting
performance from one of my favorite underrated actors,
Jeffrey Wright. Ang Lee made my favorite film of
1997, the mostly-overlooked THE ICE STORM, and he's
been a filmmaker of uncommon intelligence from his
very earliest work. Like a Chinese Howard Hawks, he
hops effortlessly from genre to genre, from culture to
culture. SENSE & SENSIBILITY, THE ICE STORM, EAT
DRINK MAN WOMAN, and RIDE WITH THE DEVIL couldn't be
more different thematically, but they all display a
keen intelligence, a subtle lyrical visual sense, and
a powerful rapport with actors.
We've been getting reviews of RIDE WITH THE DEVIL here
at AICN for well over a year now, and they've ranged
from very good to indifferent, meaning I had no idea
what to expect when I sat down to see a finished print
of the picture last week. I knew that it was a drama
set against the backdrop of the Civil War, and I knew
it had something to do with the Bushwhackers and the
infamous Lawrence Massacre. Beyond that, I walked in
a blank, and I'm glad. RIDE WITH THE DEVIL is not the
kind of defining cinematic experience that it would
have to be to make it to the top of my list in this
highly competitive year, but that's not a problem.
The film is modest by design, a small story set
against a sprawling backdrop. Jake Roedel (Tobey
Maguire) and Jack Bull Chiles (Skeet Ulrich) are
friends who have grown up in Missouri, and who find
themselves pressed into a guerilla campaign against
encroaching Northern forces after Jack Bull's father
is brutally murdered one night. The first third of
the film is exhilarating, featuring one astounding
action sequence that left me breathless. Jake, Jack
Bull, and their fellow Bushwhackers are trapped in a
farmhouse by Yankee soldiers, and they are forced to
shoot their way out and run for it. It's shot in a
style that puts you right in harm's way, reminiscent
of the opening of SAVING PRIVATE RYAN without being
derivative. As technology in filmmaking advances,
battle scenes grow more realistic and harrowing, and
their effect becomes greater. If anything, the
sequence is too good. There's no other action scene
like it in the film, and it left me feeling like the
picture was partially unbalanced.
The story takes a radical right turn when Jake, Jack
Bull, George Clyde (Simon Baker) and his "nigger"
Daniel Holt (Jeffrey Wright) all hole up for the
winter in a hillside shelter they dig and disguise.
Now, before you start e-mailing me about my use of
that word, it is a crucial part of the film. George
Clyde is presented as a gentleman, a genuinely good
person who views Holt as his friend. Despite that, he
allows everyone to refer to Holt as his "nigger,"
thinking it will force people to treat Holt with some
degree of respect. After all, he's with Clyde.
This stretch of the movie also introduces Jewel in her
role as Sue Lee, a young widow who brings food and
provisions to the men as they hide. There's some
initial tension between Jake and Jack Bull, but it's
clear that she is drawn to the charismatic Jack Bull.
In time, they even manage to forge a budding romance
that is cut short by the intrusion of the war.
When Jake, George Clyde, and Holt return to the front
lines of the conflict, they find themselves part of a
unit that is headed by Black John, played with
intensity by Jim Caviezel, and which also includes the
truly menacing Pitt Mackeson. As Mackeson, Jonathan
Rhys Meyers is excellent. The reunited Bushwhackers
are spurred by nothing as noble as duty or honor,
though, and when they ride on Lawrence, Kansas, one of
the most brutal massacres of the entire war unfolds.
This sequence marks, in my opinion, the only truly
mishandled material in the film. I understood the
horror of the sequence intellectually, but it never
hit me where I live. As a result, audiences may be
able to shake it off, let it just roll over them, and
that can't be what Lee intended.
The final third of the film is beautiful and moving,
however, as Jake and Holt walk away from the war and
find themselves crossing paths with many of the
figures from their past again. This is the stretch of
film where Jeffrey Wright more than earns his Best
Supporting Actor nomination. I saw him in ANGELS IN
AMERICA years ago, and aside from BASQUIAT, I have yet
to see him used to proper effect in film. Finally, as
he struggles to give voice and dignity to Daniel Holt,
we are given an opportunity to appreciate this
astounding actor's gifts. It's a tricky role, and the
wrong actor could have made it treacly, unwatchable.
Instead, you ache for Holt, and you can't help but
wish for one friend with half the integrity of this
man. It's subtle, strong work, and I hope it is
remembered by all when awards season hits.
Overall, this is a film of simple pleasures. It's at
its best when it focuses on the intimate story, the
moments between these people, and when it turns its
gaze away from the grand canvass of the war. There's
a lot of telling details that Lee has textured into
his film, and I appreciate that work. It is another
fine effort from a gifted filmmaker, and I hope its
quiet, confident voice is not drowned out by the big
ticket releases crowded around it this holiday season.
I have to get moving now, Harry. I'm working on a
really fun project for the end of the month, one that
has something to do with a film I'll be reviewing
later this week. Keep your eyes peeled, as I think
it'll be both entertaining and insane. Until then...
"Moriarty" out.
|