Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Mr. Beaks Interviews THE EXPLODING GIRL's Zoe Kazan!

Let's get this straight: the title of Bradley Rust Gray's THE EXPLODING GIRL is purely metaphorical; there are no full-scale detonations of actual people in this movie. If that's what you seek, there's always John Cassavetes - from ten different angles - in THE FURY. No, Gray's film is something else entirely. It's an intimate character study starring Zoe Kazan as Ivy, a young woman who's returned home to New York City after finishing her freshman year at college. Though Ivy seems happy enough at the beginning (she pals around with her best friend from childhood, and talks on the phone with her boyfriend from school), there's a tentativeness to her that's rare for a girl her age; she's not at all comfortable in her own skin. Turns out Ivy has a right not to trust her body: she's epileptic. And while she's on medication that's supposed to least control the frequency and severity of her seizures, she's still limited by her affliction. Though quick to note that she is quite different from her character, Kazan was determined to depict with complete verisimilitude the life of an epileptic girl - and this respectful commitment has yielded a performance that is revelatory for what it doesn't show. She communicates Ivy's inner turmoil by refusing to register any kind of emotional response to the frustrations (both great and small) that plague her every day. It's an extreme reaction to the fact that, at any given moment, her body could betray her weaknesses without her permission. In other words, Ivy cherishes control. It's difficult to play a character who holds back so much, but Kazan pulls it off beautifully. After impressing over the last couple of years with supporting turns in REVOLUTIONARY ROAD, ME AND ORSON WELLES and THE ADVENTURES OF PIPPA LEE, Kazan has proven that she can carry a film just by being - something very few actors can do. And while she may come by some of her talent genetically (her parents are screenwriters Nicholas Kazan and Robin Swicord, her grandfather Elia), the kind of skill she evinces in THE EXPLODING GIRL requires dedication. Kazan is in this because she loves the craft, not because it's expected of her. Aside from THE EXPLODING GIRL, you can also catch Ms. Kazan on Broadway in Martin McDonagh's new play, A BEHANDING IN SPOKANE (currently set to run until June 6th). Both are discussed in the below interview, which took place early Monday morning (Pacific time) following the Oscars. I note this because I can't believe I was conscious (though that didn't stop me from bungling the title of McDonagh's play). Fortunately, Kazan was wide awake in New York City and heroically eloquent.



Mr. Beaks: You had a hand in developing this character. How involved were you in the writing of the script?

Zoe Kazan: Oh, not at all. Brad is a complete control freak. (Laughs) I don't mean it in a bad way. He's just passionate, and his movies are his movies: he's the writer, I'm not. So I wouldn't say I had input into the writing of character as much as I had influence. Basically, Brad decided he wanted to write a movie for me before he really knew me, and we spent a lot of time taking these massive, epic walks through the cold in New York in January - and I got really sick, and it was all his fault. I went away to London to shoot ME AND ORSON WELLES, and when I came back, he had written the script. I read it, and it was so different from what I thought. I assumed because he was writing something for me that it would be based on me, but Ivy and her story have very little in common with who I am or what I've been through. I was really excited about that, actually. Brad had mostly worked with non-actors before me, so I was excited to see him take a leap of faith with something more fictional. It was really fun to see what he came up with. Then he and I worked together on figuring out who [Ivy] was, and how she talks, and the way she walks. A lot of that stuff is pretty unconscious; Brad left a lot of that up to me. So it was definitely a collaboration.

Beaks: Where did the idea of making Ivy an epileptic come from?

Kazan: That was Brad. He'll probably correct me at some point when he reads this, but I'm pretty sure that's the first idea that he had. He didn't tell me about it for a long time, and then he said, "You might want to start reading about epilepsy." (Laughs) So I did. I think in some ways it's a nice metaphor for how Ivy is careful with herself. Epileptics, like diabetics, have to be very careful with what they eat and what they drink and how much sleep they get and how much stress they're under. I think because of that, Ivy is a lot more mature than other people her age have to be - and I think there are other ways in which she's careful with herself or on guard. So it's a good way of expressing her character.

Beaks: It's a perpetual disadvantage for her. She's constantly aware of her limitations. How much research did you do into the way people live with epilepsy?

Kazan: Look, I don't have a chronic illness, but I have friends who do. In particular, I have a friend who has Lupus, and I thought about her a lot. If anyone ever made a film about someone who has lupus, and she felt it was inaccurate or exploitative, I would hate that person. So I wanted to be very careful that we weren't committing a similar crime on this, that someone who has epilepsy wouldn't look at it and felt it was [inaccurate]. I also enjoy doing research, and I tried to do a lot of it for this. The thing that was most useful to me was reading books for parents who have children with epilepsy; that helped me understand how my mom would've raised me, and the kinds of things she would've said to me. I also read a bunch of first-hand accounts, and looked at videos of people having seizures. That was one thing I was very concerned about, was the seizure itself. I think a lot of movie seizures look really fake; if you watch a person actually having a seizure, you realize how fake they often look in movies. We did a bunch of research, and I was really nervous about it, but I finally took the plunge and did the seizure. I rehearsed it once in bed - my poor boyfriend had to watch and make sure it looked right. When we finally did it... you only get a smash of it in the movie, but we did two takes of the seizure, and each take was, like, twenty minutes long. That was really physically exhausting. I was glad to finish that day.

Beaks: It's interesting that he films it not only from a distance, but from around a corner. It's such an intimate moment, it's as if the camera is afraid to capture it.

Kazan: Exactly. One thing that Brad talked about with that scene - and another scene where she cries - was the idea of giving the character her privacy. That seemed really important to him. I think Brad, as a person, has a real sense of decorum, and I think you can see that in the movie; he treats the characters with respect. I think he was also, like me, concerned that it didn't seem manipulative or exploitative; he didn't want to use the seizure as a way to gain sympathy for Ivy, or force it in your face as an audience member.

Beaks: How was it to do those street scenes Brad shot with a 300mm lens? He really gave you distance to encounter the world and not have a camera right on you.

Kazan: I loved that! Anything that helps you make believe is a good thing. And it really does help you make believe when you're not aware of walking towards or away from the camera, but when you know it's somewhere... over there, and you're just not going to worry about it. It's also really helpful to have people all around you who don't know they're in a movie; if no one around me knows I'm acting... that's the level of reality you need to have when you're trying to blend into a crowd.

Beaks: And you're not thinking about having to hit your mark or something.

Kazan: Exactly.

Beaks: Do you find that a preferable way of working?

Kazan: I don't want to say "preferable". It's an extraordinary way of working, and I feel very lucky to have been able to work in that way. It allows you to go very deep. You couldn't do that on a big budget movie; there are thousands of extras, and it's just not the same. I don't want to put down that bigger-budget way of working because there are lots of stories you can only tell in a big-budget way, but as an actor I think the ability to go that deep... of course, every actor wants to do that.

Beaks: As your career is progressing - and I hate to say things like this, but there seems to be a real "buzz" out there about where your career is headed. If it all takes off for you, are you worried that you might not be able to make as many "small" movies as you'd like?

Kazan: Well, I don't think it's a matter of quantity as much as it's quality. Yes, I think it might be hard to do as many independent films, but maybe I'd be able to get some financed. That would be a great thing, and that's kind of the goal. I'm always going to want to tell intimate stories; that's what drew me to acting in the first place. And I think the best way to tell intimate stories is on an intimate budget and an intimate scale. So I'm not worried that I'll be taken away from this world.

Beaks: Given your family history, do you have any inclination to write and direct?

Kazan: I do write. I wrote a play that was produced at the Humana Festival down in Louisville, Kentucky. I've written a couple of screenplays that I'm starting to work with producers on and get made. I'm not so ambitious about my writing as I am my acting. I don't have any desire to conquer that side of the camera. (Laughs) But I've loved movies my whole life; I guess I look at myself as a cinephile in a lot of ways. I would love to be able to be involved with filmmaking in other capacities.

Beaks: Have you ever thought about what kind of aesthetic you'd employ as a director, or which directors might influence that style?

Kazan: I think when you really love movies it's hard not to think about that kind of thing - especially when I'm writing my own screenplays. You think in images when you're writing for film, and it's hard to imagine myself turning my scripts over to someone else to direct. That said, directing is such a massive job, and I have such unbelievable respect for people who do it that I wouldn't really want to do it unless I felt I could do a great job, and I don't feel like that yet.

Beaks: Do you feel like you need to gain more life experiences?

Kazan: I think I would want to make a short film before I made a feature. If I was really going to direct, I would want to shadow someone for a while just to see how they work. I don't know enough about how the camera works. If I were to do something like that, I wouldn't want to do it in a half-assed way.

Beaks: So A BEHEADING IN SPOKANE...

Kazan: BEHANDING.

Beaks: Ugh. I'm know. It's early.

Kazan: Don't worry. Let's just be specific. It's a hand.

Beaks: He's searching for his hand, I know. The whole concept of the play strikes me as sort of Sam Shepard-esque. Do you think Martin's writing has changed, or is this quintessential Martin McDonagh?

Kazan: It's hard to say "quintessential". Looking at THE PILLOWMAN and then CRIPPLE OF INISHMAN, I don't know if you'd think those were from the same writer. He's definitely got a wide range of styles in him, and this is another one. This is much more farcical than THE PILLOWMAN or THE BEAUTY QUEEN OF LEENANE. But most of his plays are wildly funny, and this one is no exception. It's also very dark. There are parts of it that are terrifying. But there's something childlike and young in Martin; his imagination is very open in the way that a child's is. I think you see that more clearly in this play than in the others.



THE EXPLODING GIRL opens in limited release Friday, March 12th. Faithfully submitted, Mr. Beaks

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus