Logo

Cool News

Brace Yourselves For A VERY HAROLD & KUMAR CHRISTMAS!! + John Cho Talks About TREK's "Lens Flares", Sorta...

Published at:  Mar 12, 2010 11:02:41 AM CST


Merrick here...


Collider spoke with John Cho, who said quite a bit a new HAROLD & KUMAR movie, and spoke significantly less about the next TREK film.

Regarding HAROLD...


- looks like it is happening
- we catch up a little bit later in Harold and Kumar’s lives
-takes place over the holiday season
- this could be a legit holiday movie
- the intent is to honor the holiday traditional style of movies
- Neil Patrick Harris is supposed to be in it


...Cho said to Collider HERE, in a piece which goes on to reveal a few more details about the second sequel. If you want to know more about H&K 3, or are waiting with bated breath to hear John's take on the use of "lense flares" in the last STAR TREK movie, you can view the embed below:


I really enjoyed HAROLD & KUMAR GO TO WHITE CASTLE, and liked (but can't remember much of) ESCAPE FROM GUANTANAMO BAY. I'd totally be up for another film featuring these characters, 'specially if they get Santa high, or if the story features hot women wearing skimpy elf garb.


--- Follow Merrick on Twitter! ---







    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 10:58:05 AM CST

    Sulu is Japanese, not Korean.

    by mostholy

    Also, first.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 10:59:38 AM CST

    and he's not gay.

    by cadderly99

  • Mar 12, 2010 10:59:46 AM CST

    Sulu

    by mrpaisley

    George Takei recalled Gene Roddenberry wanted the character to represent all of Asia, which symbolized the peace of the Trek universe in spite of the numerous wars in the continent. Roddenberry did not want a nationally specific surname, so he looked at a map and saw the Sulu Sea. "He thought, 'Ah, the waters of that sea touch all shores'," the actor recalled, "and that's how my character came to have the name Sulu."

    So now, Sulu is Korean.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:00:03 AM CST

    Lens flares

    by iamlegolas

    I'm a pretty preception guy, and critical, too, but I saw STAR TREK and didn't notice an overuse of lens flares, or even thought about lens flares when watching it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:00:25 AM CST

    Also, Sulu is gay.

    by thrillhouse77

    Those knowing looks that Pine was giving him all movie?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:00:59 AM CST

    George Takei likes John Cho playing Sulu

    by iamlegolas

    that's all that matters

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:01:10 AM CST

    I enjoyed the ST Film...

    by pawprint

    That is all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:07:30 AM CST

    This is a welcome addition to my Holiday movie list

    by bumlove

    My Christmas movie night can now include Harold and Kumar...long with Gremlins and Die Hard.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:07:44 AM CST

    NPH would Never have been on the Oscars w/o H&K

    by jimbojones123

    NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH NPH

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:12:41 AM CST

    Didn't Kumar retired from acting?

    by bowtiehoon

    and join the Obama administration or something?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:21:54 AM CST

    Yes bowiehoon

    by cadderly99

    but the honeymoons over, obama sucks ass too it seems. havent had a good president since hillary clinton.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:22:30 AM CST

    jimbojones123...

    by lordporkington

    You're officially my 'stupid cunt of the day'. Well done.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:24:21 AM CST

    ...no NPH as NPH movie?

    by yourstepdaddy

    ...and not that Avatar ripoff movie the Smurfs...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:25:37 AM CST

    IAmLegolas

    by wes89horns

    Agreed, I never felt distracted by lens flares, I liked the effect and it gave the movie this "bigger than life" feel to it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:27:14 AM CST

    NPH as a christmas ghost?

    by bouncy x

    i realize an after-credits scene shows him getting up after that apparently fatal shotgun blast but considering its an xmas movie, it be sorta funny to have him appear as some sorta yoda like figure. of course he'd have to be riding that unicorn.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:27:29 AM CST

    Kumar is busy kissing Obama's ass

    by estacado1

    ho has no time fo this shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:28:07 AM CST

    please ban and delete jimbojones123

    by iamlegolas

    thank you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:34:44 AM CST

    no mention of Kal Penn?

    by aka_gern_blanston

    Seems odd there's no mention of wether or not Kal Penn feels the same way, as he left House and acting altogether to go work as an Arts and Foreign liason for the White House. Is he back so soon, after they had Kutner off himself?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:35:34 AM CST

    oh and jimbo jones

    by aka_gern_blanston

    forgot the meds today?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:38:27 AM CST

    You can't kill NPH...

    by the dum guy

    It is like killing herpes or Godzilla, can't be done.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:43:13 AM CST

    Forget about the Oscars NPH wouldnt have a job

    by moore12

    if it wasn't for H&K.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:44:01 AM CST

    Anyone who complains about flares...

    by fah-cue

    ... in the Star Trek movie is an ASSHOLE and is looking to bitch about something. Those flares adding more tension intensity to the movie. That interviewer should stop going to the movies and read Twilight books.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:49:50 AM CST

    If Neil Patrick Harris isn't in it...

    by thedarklinglord

    What would be the fucking point?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:55:36 AM CST

    NPH

    by cobb05

    Since he died, will he come back as a ghost, to give it a Christmas Carol vibe?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 11:56:04 AM CST

    Is there any project that people say NO to anymore?

    by vulcan_csc_rep

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:14:06 PM CST

    Lens flares

    by dstrange

    If you listen to the film commentary, they were put in to make the movie feel more like a documentary--as if all of this was really happening. They wanted the flares to give it a more gritty, real feel. Whether you agree or not, that's the reason from the mouths of the filmmakers themselves. Personally, I agree, but to each their own. (And, no I didn't watch the vidclip - network connection is ass right now. So, my apologies if Cho covered this.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:18:32 PM CST

    Everyone I know

    by ufoclub1977

    noticed the lens flares, it was just part of the style, kind of like a throwback to the rainbow prism flares in Star Trek the Motion Picture.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:18:41 PM CST

    Will Kumar smoke a joint in the White House with his boss?

    by royston lodge

    I'm just sayin'...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:21:53 PM CST

    Royston -

    by dstrange

    I'm all for that if they get the real Obama, hehe. That fake "W" from HK2 was just terrible. Well, really when it comes down to it, the whole second movie did nothing for me. Watched it once and that was enough. But HK1? Damn, I've seen that like 400 times, at least. Hilarity.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:26:04 PM CST

    OK but....

    by captzeep

    Did you ever notice all the white people in the H&K movies are bad? Except maybe the Jewish potheads in WC.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:38:45 PM CST

    Kumar and the White House

    by finky089

    is only doing that gig for a year I think. He should be done by now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:39:11 PM CST

    Although, H&K Go To The White House

    by finky089

    could be a good sequel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:46:00 PM CST

    "I'm a pretty preception guy,"

    by battle_royale_with_cheese

    Uh, I see.
    Also, the lens flares were fucking distracting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:48:02 PM CST

    Sorry kids....

    by jimbojones123

    Got excited.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:01:09 PM CST

    I did not notice the lens flares.

    by royston lodge

    I guess they couldn't have been that distracting...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:02:22 PM CST

    No he ain't. He's Laotian.

    by royston lodge

    If only Cotton Hill was a Star Trek character.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:09:32 PM CST

    JJ used the lens flares because he

    by dingbatty

    wanted it to look like Firefly. He also nicked the chase cam. Whedon said in the commentary on the Firefly discs that he purposely showed lens flares to give the show the gritty feeling of a 1970's show. Whedon probably nicked it from Tarantino.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:13:40 PM CST

    Star Trek 2

    by jdhasson

    I hope it has a shitload more lens flare.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:29:23 PM CST

    dstrange re: Fake Bush

    by bumlove

    I know, right? The fake Bush from Kumar 2 was awful. There are some really good Bush impersonators out there who look and sound just like him with the help of some make up...but that guy looked like an extra from Planet of the Apes. It wasn't believable at all. They could have at least forked over a few hundred bucks for a quality Bush impersonator...I doubt they are all that expensive.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:38:04 PM CST

    Iamlegolas -- you're clearly NOT very perceptive

    by brechtsky

    re-watch the first 30 seconds of that film, or pretty mcuh any other 30 seconds, and tell me there isnt an overabundance of lens flares... I love jj, but he needs to lose the flares.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:42:14 PM CST

    also dingbattyt

    by brechtsky

    joss whedon is not the inventor of lens flare usage, and far far from it ... better more competent directors have been using them for years, but no one's ever overused them with the absurdity of jj's trek.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:51:29 PM CST

    seems like a good guy, too

    by brechtsky

    god bless him for putting up with the interviewer for so long without complaint or anything.... longest 8 minutes of my life, and there were cuts in that clip, so Im sure it was longer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 1:58:33 PM CST

    You didn't eat the cockmeat sandwich?

    by jaysin420

  • Mar 12, 2010 2:03:20 PM CST

    Settle down, nerds

    by battle_royale_with_cheese

    I liked Abrahm's Trek, I just thought he used too much lens flare.
    Ultratron, I especially apologize for offending your delicate sensibilities. However, I'm not sure what else you expect from a complete and utter fucking moron. I guess maybe I should read some more Kirk-Spock slash fiction so I can become smarter.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 2:15:18 PM CST

    captzeep -

    by dstrange

    Yes. All the white people (except NPH) are "bad". But considering the writers are whiteboys and they did that on purpose, I don't see the problem.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 2:20:35 PM CST

    BumLove -

    by dstrange

    Agreed 100%. But even a better W wouldn't have saved HK2. It was way too over the top the entire time. At least in HK1 by the time we get to the truly ridiculous stuff (like riding a cheetah) the audience is invested in the characters and story enough to go, "well, ok, it's silly, but I'll buy it". With HK2 they made the most common sequel mistake: everything must be bigger and better and louder, etc etc. It ruined it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 2:29:27 PM CST

    Uh, Merrick. Technically the 'second sequel' is Star Trek 3

    by azultool

    Sorry to split cunt hairs, but it's da troof.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 2:31:03 PM CST

    Neil Patrick Harris HAS to be in 3!!!

    by mr nicholas

  • Mar 12, 2010 2:31:13 PM CST

    Ooops, you were talking about H & K 3...

    by azultool

    Sorry, Merrick. I shouldn't have doubted you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 2:39:13 PM CST

    What would Roger Eberts do?

    by mc_dlyte

    http://tinyurl.com/ye3tl78

    Reply to Talkback

  • This guy should write for Larry King. Fucking nerd.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 2:56:13 PM CST

    Gozu - exactly.

    by dstrange

    Whenever anyone throws out the "my opinion is law" BS I just have to laugh. Obviously JJ and crew didn't think it was overused, so it IS open for debate. Hehe. I love this site.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 3:12:39 PM CST

    Good points about HK2, dstrange

    by bumlove

    It was an inferior sequel, for sure...though I still liked it. But I haven't seen it twice. It definitely tried too hard to up the ante...killing NPH (even if he comes back after the credits) was one example.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 3:37:54 PM CST

    lol yeah right

    by themandrakeroot

    Did someone really say the lens flares added "tension intesity" to the movie? Yeah.....that's what it did. Star Trek wasn't bad but it had even less of a noteworthy plot then Avatar did. Fact.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 3:49:12 PM CST

    Did MandrakeRoot just slag Avatar?

    by bumlove

    That's a true sign of Avatar backlash.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 4:21:42 PM CST

    Tiresome interviewer...

    by admonisher

    Cho was a good sport, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 4:43:07 PM CST

    Lens flares were everywhere

    by jack kovack

    I noticed lens flares constantly during the film. Even during the ship scenes they were used too much. For me the flares were a distraction. But I also have ADD so maybe that made a difference.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 4:52:35 PM CST

    Flares

    by fxmulder35

    Personally, I love the look of the flares. Visually, TREK kicked the ass of all three WARS prequels. If AVATAR had not landed awesome mo-cap...TREK woulda won the Oscar.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 5:26:03 PM CST

    the flares! they do nothing!

    by adingoateclairesbaby

    jesus titty fucking christ, i can't believe a bunch of people are debating the use of flares on st. i erased that movie from my memory as soon as i walked out, it was so boring. it made mission impossible 3 look like a masterpiece. i still don't get what the big fuss is on aicn.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 5:34:33 PM CST

    flare

    by phantomcreeps

    I scratched one of my eyes before watching Star Trek, and believe me, that bright white fucking lens flare made me watch that fucker with one eye. Trust me it's there, even Abrams joked about it. Still liked the movie though, just crank it down for part 2.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 5:41:36 PM CST

    always some brainless unprepared douche doing interviews

    by swivile bobble fizz fizz

  • Mar 12, 2010 6:31:37 PM CST

    Aw hell naw

    by spud mcspud

    The flares were fucking stupid, way over-used, but you guys already knew that. It was like watching a fucking Volkswagen commercial at times.

    Hey, at least AsimovLives isn't on here frothing at the mouth. Yet...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 7:04:15 PM CST

    NPH didnt die?

    by qqmore

    I could have sworn that he started to move at the end of the last film. could be wrong though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 7:11:13 PM CST

    Isn't Kumar too busy sucking off Obama?

    by cash907

    Thought he turned his back on Hollywood, or some pretentious shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 9:58:31 PM CST

    I love christmas movies

    by beyondthunderdome2girls1cupbillcosby

  • Mar 12, 2010 10:54:05 PM CST

    What I remember from H&K Gitmo

    by jaka

    Is large amounts of bottomless women who had some bush. Great scene. That's how I'm throwing me next pool party now that I think about it. At least, as soon as I get a pool.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 10:56:33 PM CST

    I hope Star Trek 2 is filmed entirely in the...

    by jaka

    ...Budweiser plant, with the camera just panning back and forth - scene after scene, creating infinite lens flares as the characters take turns traveling through giant sewer pipes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 12:05:48 AM CST

    JJ grabs the camera with both hands...

    by moosemalloy

    ... and shakes, shakes, shakes!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 3:56:17 AM CST

    ESCAPE FROM GUANTANAMO BAY was pretty funny, but...

    by the_crimson_king

    the best scene was still the bottomless pool party, holy shit

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 3:57:41 AM CST

    the first shot of that woman's ass and bush...

    by the_crimson_king

    got a great reaction in theaters from some I assume stoned guys, never would I have thought I'd see a landing stripped bush projected on the big screen, it was epic

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 9:02:38 AM CST

    Harold and Kumar vs Cheech and Chong

    by gotilk

    Much cooler than some holiday movie. I'd pay to see that one, if they went all the way and even brought Paul Reubens on board as well as NPH.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 9:14:17 AM CST

    Yeah much RESPECT to Harold and Kumar for the bush!

    by hollywoodhellraiser

    Seriously when today films are overloaded with massive amount of guy's dicks(yeah I know that guy was bottomless) and asses, it great to see some female flesh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 9:44:27 AM CST

    John Knoll hates lens flares

    by roguewarrior65

    I remember John Knoll getting all annoyed at the excessive use of lens flares since cinematographers go to great lengths to eliminate them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 11:33:29 AM CST

    no subject

    by falseflag

    H&K3 will definitely be a great sequel if Kal Penn gets wiped out in some amazing hi-tech fashion, HOLLYWOOD-STYLE!!! Kal Penn is the BIGGEST exploitative sell-out of all time!
    Maybe even more so than his masta.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 11:41:55 AM CST

    are they really lens flares?

    by bouncy x

    i mean they literally just pointed flashlights at the camera to create them, its not it was actual lens flares.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 12:31:50 PM CST

    George Takei Likes John Cho

    by rainesmaker

    In the butt

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 3:49:49 PM CST

    I notice the Lens Flares, but...

    by lobanhaki

    ...my thought is, "Why do they have the lights turned up so blindingly bright on the inside of this ship that this is happening?"

    See, to my mind, you use lens flares to symbolize lights that are extremely bright. I got the opposite feeling from that guy: inside, you want your light nice and even in an operational setting, so fewer hotspots.

    Outside, though, the dynamic range of the lights is higher, and the power of the lights, like the Sun, planets reflecting the sun, is pretty high.

    Then again, I am a radio/tv/film degree holder, so that's the kind of things I'd think about! ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 4:45:34 PM CST

    Harold and Kumar go to the Moon in 3D

    by mrblackjackbauer

    this is what I want to fucking see.

    harold and kumar are on a public tour of nasa with their girlfriends during a highly publicized mission where NASA is sending chimps to the moon.

    H&K get the brilliant idea of getting the chimps high on some of their best weed and how awesome itwould be for them to be high while high.

    so they somehow sneak aboard and get sent to the moon WITH the chimps... in 3D!!
    there will be a brilliant shot of them looking back at earth smoking some herb giggling their asses off while chimps are floating in zero gravity right in front of them. the ULTIMATE get high movie....ALL IN 3D!!!

    now it cant happen cuz i wrote it here :(

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 13, 2010 4:48:12 PM CST

    Fly to the Moon I mean

    by mrblackjackbauer

    and the commercial would feature sinatra singing fly me to the moon while all this shit is going on.

    this movie would make a ZILLION dollars

    Reply to Talkback

  • Just kidding. I'd rather see your movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 14, 2010 12:05:34 AM CST

    Lobanhaki - hit the nail on the head

    by crimson dynamo

    i thought damn that bridge would be hard on the eyes if you were actually there working on it. ST2 should just be an hour and a half of a floodlight pointing straight at the camera

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 15, 2010 8:55:45 PM CDT

    Re: No one watches the videos + Kal Penn

    by larry sellers

    Cho did talk about Kal Penn about 1:30 in. He doesn't know how his job will affect production...he doesn't even really seem to know what exactly Penn does. There is also no director. And yeah there were way too many lens flares.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback