Logo

Cool News

Clint Eastwood to make J Edgar Hoover flick? Hope he casts Nathan Lane.

Published at:  Mar 10, 2010 6:44:32 PM CST

Hey folks, Harry here... Now this... God, who even knows what a J Edgar Hoover pic would be. That J Edgar Hoover was a short, paranoid, power-hungry cross-dressing oddball that forever changed Law Enforcement for the better... well, that we know. But what would a bio-pic by Clint Eastwood hone in on. Would he leave the shots of J Edgar in his dress at home as he reads through reports? Would it focus on Hoover's obsession with Hollywood and his intense hatred for that hotbed. Honestly, I'd kill to see Clint Eastwood's J EDGAR HOOVER no matter what, but if it starred Nathan Lane - I'd cheer. Right? Giggle.



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:48:16 PM CST

    Billy Crudup as the lead!

    by logan_1973

    His turn as JEH was about the best thing about PUBLIC ENEMIES. Reprise!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:49:36 PM CST

    What has the fact he was short got to do with it?

    by famouseccles

    You're fat, Harry. How does that feel?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:50:48 PM CST

    MM64

    by buccaneer

    because Lane likes to dress like a woman too..?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:51:16 PM CST

    OMG Nathan Lane is the most annoying...

    by jaka

    ...human being, ever!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:54:31 PM CST

    Oh, but, uhhh....

    by jaka

    ...I seem to enjoy Clint's directing (haven't seen Invictus, yet), so this sounds cool.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:54:35 PM CST

    Bob Hoskins was terrific as J. Edgar in "Nixon"

    by backrivercatfish

    Probably too old now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:55:39 PM CST

    By terrific I mean gay

    by backrivercatfish

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:57:07 PM CST

    Jeez, this guy directs more...

    by eustisclay

    ...than Spielberg. I say give all the projects that have been gathering dust in development hell to Clint.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 6:57:15 PM CST

    G. Gordon Liddy said Hoover wasn't gay

    by backrivercatfish

    Liddy did time though so who knows

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 7:00:07 PM CST

    Lookin forward to this and bob hoskins

    by tazzzer

    Nixon was the finest film of this type ever to have been done in my opinon and hoskins was indeed brilliant. Still, Nathan Lane could do a cool job especially since a Eastwood project. One to watch..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 7:10:56 PM CST

    Who are the ad wizards...

    by wampa 1

    ...that came up with this one?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 7:23:03 PM CST

    He was short! So he MUST be an oddball!

    by umbral_shadow_

    Hahahaha. Well, short people usually are. Just look at Tom Cruise.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 7:33:43 PM CST

    Hoover was everything Dubya Bush wanted to be:

    by fiester

    Guy had more files, wiretaps, blackmail dossiers than anyone in history and was not afraid to use them. Could be a creepy good biopic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 7:39:36 PM CST

    Eastwood needs to do another Western.

    by soylentmean

    As in star and direct. He needs a best actor Oscar before he bucket kicks. And what better genre than the one that made him famous?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 7:42:25 PM CST

    I like that Eastwood just keeps pumping work out

    by macready452

    Clint is all that is awesome. He just keeps getting better. Behind or in front of the camera. I'm getting my celebrity worship in BEFORE he dies. Unlike the Haim thread. He'll cast Phil Hoffman.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 7:44:34 PM CST

    I'm presuming there's some evidence this will happen?

    by countryboy

    There's no reference to any source. Where'd it come from? It looks odd to see an article that's just Harry opining...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 7:49:05 PM CST

    why is Harry giggling like a 13 yr old bitch

    by macready452

    Big Cheese..giggle. J Edgar Hoover in a dress...giggle.Harden the fuck up Harry.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 8:06:40 PM CST

    MacReady452

    by headgeek

    Because I am a 13 yr old bitch, bitch

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 8:10:05 PM CST

    Will they include unfounded crap like Hoover was a crossdresser?

    by palooka_boy

    The only "evidence" for this is a single, unverified claim from a single unreliable witness quoted in a biography. It's just been repeated so many times that it's taken as accepted fact.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 8:37:35 PM CST

    palooka_boy... there is more than one claim

    by heckles

    And it's widely known. Not just wikipedia nonsense, either. There are no known pictures of this dude in a dress, but if it talks like a tranny, walks like a tranny, and Eddie Murphy picks it up, it's a tranny.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 8:40:15 PM CST

    I'd watch a musical version with Nathan Lane

    by almightycow

  • Mar 10, 2010 8:41:47 PM CST

    Can he make Hoover badass instead of evil?

    by onin solstice

    The guy took it to the mob during his run and kept some actual commie conspiracies at bay. He had his moments of kickass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 9:00:24 PM CST

    I'd love to see these alleged pictures

    by palooka_boy

    And know their source. It's amazing what photoshop can accomplish. There are plenty of (also unproven if not more probable) claims that he was a homosexual. But a crossdresser? No. This is one of those things that the collective unconscious has come to accept as fact because it's been repeated ad nauseam by various forms of media. Just like many people think the day after the Superbowl is the most common day to report domestic abuse. There's absolutely zero reliable verification of this. Don't believe me?


    http://www. straightdope.com/columns/read/2423/was-j-edgar-hoover-a-cross-dresser

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 9:03:53 PM CST

    Misread what you wrote about pictures...

    by palooka_boy

    But the post stands regardless. And, to the point, a crossdresser and a tranny are two very different things.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 9:03:59 PM CST

    I'd rather see a Spike Lee J. Edgar Hoover pic

    by bumlove

  • Mar 10, 2010 9:05:18 PM CST

    Good article on Eastwood in last week's New Yorker...

    by flickapoo

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/03/08/100308fa_fact_denby Take out the spaces of course.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 9:06:38 PM CST

    Hoover as tranny.

    by fiester

    It is unsubstantiated, but I think he was such an unmitigated prick people are all too happy to accept anything negative about the guy.

    There is substantial circumstantial evidence he may have been a closet homosexual however, He had a very intimate and peculiar relationship with his assistant. Oh, and then there was his hatchetman Roy Cohn.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 9:13:59 PM CST

    People love to believe secrets about secretive men

    by palooka_boy

    And nobody was moreso than Hoover. Douchebag that he was, he built the FBI into what it is. Gay? It's very possible. Roy Cohn even moreso (if Cohn wasn't gay, I'd eat my hat). But neither of these men have ever been confirmed to be gay. Then again, neither has Liberace. The whole cross-dressing thing really gets my goat though. It's just unnecessary character assassination.

    Reply to Talkback

  • There's more evidence pointing to the fact that he was the latter. And really, if he did suck cocks, which he most likely did, would it really matter if he wore a dress before doing so? I say...let's call him a cock-sucker instead of a cross-dresser and set the records straight.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 9:51:25 PM CST

    The real important question is will Dyson give a blurb?

    by soylentmean

    "Before my awesome vacuums were around this guy sucked harder than anybody else"-Dyson.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 9:53:01 PM CST

    MOCAP Hoover with Andy Serkis

    by soylentmean

    and have him climb a really tall building in a dress. Phallic symbolism. Do it Clint!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 10:02:53 PM CST

    Yes, but will it have CGI?

    by hercthinksentourageisbetterthanarrestedd

    Then we'll know if Harry will love it. It might even be as good as The Phantom Menace!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 10:08:30 PM CST

    Is it FACT that he crossdressed?

    by sonnyfern

    I know all the stories, but I also heard it was bullshit. Anyone know the real deal?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 10:21:34 PM CST

    Another boring Eastwood trophy hunt

    by reno

    They're becoming as December as Grinch reruns now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 10:23:15 PM CST

    Sonnyfern..

    by traumnovelle

    No, it's not. In fact, Truman Capote pretty much confirmed that it was a rumor that he made up because he didn't like Hoover, because Hoover didn't like gay people.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 10:40:59 PM CST

    Clint is a conservative, he'll make Hoover Top Cop

    by chien_sale

    Super Cop

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 10:59:55 PM CST

    Hoover was gay, so

    by chief joseph

    people back then must have thought gay = transvestite. His lover was named Clyde Tolson. Great read at http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/usa/j-edgar-hoover/

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 10, 2010 11:37:40 PM CST

    I guess he told me. giggle

    by macready452

  • Mar 10, 2010 11:46:28 PM CST

    Did Oliver Stone pass?

    by benbraddock

    Sounds exactly like his kind of film..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 12:41:46 AM CST

    I like the Larry Cohen version with Broderick Crawford

    by margot_tenenbaum

    All of the best docudramas were made in the '70s. It was a golden age. Helter Skelter with Steve Railsback, the Jonestown thing with Powers Booth, All the President's Men etc.

    chien_sale, most conservatives like law & order but aren't super thrilled with all-powerful federal agencies headed for decades by unelected dudes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 12:53:35 AM CST

    Leo.Dicaprio as J.Edgar

    by hallmitchell

    If he did Hughes he can do this one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 1:14:07 AM CST

    Empty your heads! Empty your heads!

    by thenorthlander

    If you think of J. Edgar Hoover, J. Edgar Hoover will appear and destroy us!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 1:43:44 AM CST

    Great, J Edgar Homo.

    by stalkeye

    Neither mind the fact that he was gay, but the idea that he was a racist. talk about the opressed being the opresser.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 1:45:40 AM CST

    Gay as a chorus dancer

    by goatherdingclownhunter

    A Hoover movie will inevitably have to span a TON of interesting 20th century history. It will be too much to take on.

    Liberals hate Hoover for his unethical ways, but surely they must love the fact that he was at least POSSIBLY as gay as a chorus dancer. So will this biopic worship or deconstruct him? Or will it deconsruct his ethics but praise his gayness?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 2:31:24 AM CST

    Harry wears dresses, too.

    by who_dat_ninja

    Big ass muumuus, like Homer Simpson. It's fucking scary. Living in Austin sucks sometimes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 3:18:00 AM CST

    FamousEccles

    by themagicalhornofguntata

    He wasn't alone. Napoleon was a short, dead dude. Apparently.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 4:53:05 AM CST

    www.residentevilgenius.com

    by mc_dlyte

    Vote what fucking shit movie review I will write this weekend now

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 5:27:49 AM CST

    Actually, theagicalhornofguntata

    by makneil

    Napoleon, while dead, I've heard was actually of average height for people of his era.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 5:47:17 AM CST

    umbral_shadow_ - I was going to say RDJ but he got

    by famouseccles

    pretty wacky on the good stuff. How about Michael J. Fox and Tim Roth? Short but not odd in the slightest. Michael Emerson is only on this list.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 5:49:25 AM CST

    themagicalhornofguntata, explain how Napolean is

    by famouseccles

    an oddball? He was horny as hell and one hell of a military force.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 5:50:22 AM CST

    Ahnywho, Lane is too short to play Hoover. So there :).

    by famouseccles

  • Mar 11, 2010 8:23:36 AM CST

    Photos with his...."friend"

    by damned if i can login

    No photos of him in a dress, but a bio I saw on him some years ago had many photos of Hoover and his close friend in matching outfits.It does raise questions to the extent of that relationship.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 9:18:13 AM CST

    Clint is a Conservative.....not a Facist.

    by dangerdave

    Thought I would bet money that Clint will not just make some scandalous biop, I doubt that he will make him a TOP COP..justice obsessed...Law Dog.
    he will talk about the good things that he did, establishing the FBI, and his profiling and blackmailing and his general facist mentality.
    Clint ALWAYS delievers!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 9:30:53 AM CST

    They should let Johnny Fever reprise his role from Clue

    by rev_skarekroe

    It's the only logical casting decision. They should also film an alternate ending to Ghostbusters in which Hoover is chosen as the form of the world's destruction, as suggested by Venkman.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 11:45:35 AM CST

    Hoover was not a cross-dresser...

    by chocolatejeebus

    ..and might not have been gay, not that there's anything wrong with that. Right Liberals? There's two words that don't go together. Just go to the Straight Dope web page and look up J. Edgar Hoover (7th article down). Cecil Adams is one of the most even-handed, level-headed columnists you will read. (He only lets evidence dictate facts)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 2:50:50 PM CST

    Nathan Lane, as long he's 10 times more flamboyantic than

    by ricarleite2

    the character he plaied on Birdcage. And the other characters are played totally serious and his sexuality is never mentioned.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 3:24:33 PM CST

    Don't tell Spike Lee!

    by thommcg

    He'll probably complain Eastwood made a film featuring a non-black Hoover...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 3:41:54 PM CST

    CHANGED LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR THE BETTER?

    by rollosoze

    It's a fact that the Hoover administration's fondness for illegal wiretaps, harassment and torture paved the way to the Patriot Act and the horrors perpetrated at Guantanamo Bay. I think your statement up top was flawed, Harry. Don't let your politics get as sloppy as your reviews.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 5:26:29 PM CST

    So what if he was a cross-dresser or gay...

    by dogu4

    ..what's offensive is/was his hypocracy and vindictiveness, not the fact that he may have been one way or some other way. His personal life was non-typical to say the least, and if one can believe what some madames and dominatrices say about their most powerful/responsible clientel's tastes in sexual fantasy, and what psychologists tell us about those who crave psycho-sexual kink as being those whose public personas are such that they have to subduct them-selves until they can alleviate their controll issues sexually in some lived-out fantasy that may go way beyond the 'wifely duties' as they used to be thought of.
    Wearing a red dress as a costume, or assuming some other fanatasy roleplay in addression our highly constrained and socially informed sexuality, should not be confused with how we perform our public roles. He was still one mean prick from all accounts and the record supports that if it can be measured by the degree and manner of vindictiveness it expresses.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 6:11:23 PM CST

    RolloSoze

    by outsidechance

    Actually, law enforcement pre-Hoover was rife with constitutional violations. And, granted, Hoover continued many of them. However, in many (if not most) other areas he established levels of professional that were unheard of that time. Furthermore it is generally acknowleged that federal law enforcement pre-Hoover was far more corrupt than under him. Does this excuse Hoover's own abuses? Of course not. But the fact of the matter is that, as bad as he might have been, he was far, far, better than what went before.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 11, 2010 11:02:17 PM CST

    Leo Dicaprio to play every 1930s, 40s and 50s historical fiure

    by takingscorpioscalls

  • Mar 12, 2010 12:08:10 AM CST

    changed law enforcement for the better?

    by awardgiver

    by dressing in girlie clothing, blowing Clyde Tolson, being blackmailed by the mafia so they could get more powerful, enacting the unconstitutional COINTELPRO and killing JFK? damn skippy!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 3:55:09 AM CST

    hey Rock Hudson was gay

    by chien_sale

    and macho Conservatives still admire the guy

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 12, 2010 10:15:57 AM CST

    will this be based on the iconic two volume

    by emeraldboy

    biography from a number of years ago.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback