Cool News
Abrams’ MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE IV Set For Memorial Day 2011!!
I am – Hercules!!
The project still doesn’t have a director, but Paramount says “Mission: Imposssible IV” will hit cinemas in about 16 months: Memorial Day 2011.
Now the news that may trouble some.
The script is still by latter-day “Alias” writer-producers Josh Appelbaum and Andre Nemec, working from an idea by franchise star Tom Cruise and “M:I 3” co-writer-director (and “M:I 4” producer) J.J. Abrams.
If you loved the American TV series “October Road” and “Life on Mars” (I did not), you’ll be happy to learn screenwriters Appelbaum and Nemec masterminded both.
If you loved the latter three years of “Alias” (I did not), you’ll be happy to learn Appelbaum and Nemec joined that show midway through season three.
Appelbaum and Nemec are also masterminding ABC’s fast-approaching thriller “Happy Town,” whose pilot Televisionary deemed “ridiculous and insipid.”
Appelbaum and Nemec’s other writing credits include episodes of “Martial Law,” “Profiler,”’ “Going to California,” “The Chronicle,” “She Spies,” and “Fastlane.”
Find all of Variety’s story on the matter here.
Follow Herc on Twitter!!
-
+ Expand All
-
Another crap movie, on the way.
-
Didn't think they'd make a part 4..
-
MI:3 wasn't quite as bad as MI:2. Maybe....
-
Seriously, how do these same crappy ass writers keep getting jobs. I can see one bad project, maybe two, hell even three, but four, five, and six... Yep, time to go find some coked out wonderkind waiter in LA that's posed to be the next hot thing until he burns out at the age of 23. Until then use him like he's going to reuse every drop of heroin in that needle, and quit hiring these hacks.
-
$397,850,012
-
Not Tom Cruise splaying his ego all over the film.
-
She has a buttaface, but that body is just ridiculous.
-
Feb 09, 2010 11:50:05 PM CST
The remake of M:I 4 will start production after the original in
by mr spork
-
Cruise is just using Abrams' recent success for Paramount with STAR TREK to reactivate interest in the Franchise. They would rather have a STAR TREK sequel from Abrams than have him get bogged down in the more expensive and possibly less lucrative 4th MI movie. Who WILL direct it, is the question?
-
TRUE LIES 2 needs to happen if a MI:4 is coming out next year! Cameron making another spy movie would rule.
-
Best of the series, by far. I'm not really a fan of Cruise, but I'll go see this.
-
I liked MI: 3 actually. Philip Seymour Hoffman for the win.
-
Eff the haters! That was easily the best installment of the series.
If Tom Cruise had just shut his trap during the lead up the domestic B.O would have been much larger. Let's hope he does this time around. -
But for the love of all that is sacred, DO NOT....and I mean DO NOT use the masks as a twist again. It's played out and really hurt the last one.
-
MI:3 wasn't as good as 1, but anything's better than MI:2. I'm not keen for MI:4 though if it has anyone still on board that managed to mess up the helicopter chase through a wind farm.
Seriously- how do you mess that up!? -
...in a "James Bond" sort of way. However, the previous installments just sucked.
-
Need a Roland Hand and other classic characters now. JJ can almost do no wrong.
-
rebooting.
Cruise has had his hands all over it for too long -
Steven Spielberg, Oliver Stone, Martin Scorsese, Ridley Scott, Tony Scott, Adrian Lyne, David Fincher, Christopher Nolan and Roman Polanski would be dream directors for the job also. Antoine Fuqua, Peter Berg, Brian Singer, Stephen Hopkins, John Moore, Roger Donaldson, Andrew Davis, Wolfgang Petersen, Jan DeBont, F. Gary Gray and Francis Lawrence could proove wise choices as well. Or bring back DePalma. Too bad John Frankenheimer's dead.
-
is very strong. There was a good sense of teamwork and there was a good balance between quiet tension and action.
For me, the rest of the movie didn't maintain that balance. I love the first film because I think it did.
Another disappointment from 3 is the scene at the Shanghai skyrise. Luther said stealing the Rabbit's Foot was more difficult than the break-in at Langley but we never see any of it once Ethan gets in the building. I would like to have seen it. -
First I liked the flick, even though it was almost exactly like an Alias episode, even down to the same structured (start precredits with the hero messed up and trapped, flashback until getting to that scene again, heck even the title cards for the different places felt like Alias).
Why is it percieved as a flop? even though worldwide gross was good, the domestic gross (the one used by studios to determined this) was 134 mill of a supossed budget of 150. MI2 grossed domestic 215 even MI 1 kicked its ass with 180 domestic with a way lower budget
-
in the Mission Impossible movies and in all other movies too
-
In fairness to Cruise, that summer was pretty much the low point for him. Opinion has to be better now than it was then and perhaps Knight & Day has tested well enough to merit an M:I-4 in their eyes.
-
Is there some huge demand for this?
-
Are you kidding me? Her face is beautiful.
-
I think Cruise's star is tarnished (not beyond repair, and taking into consideration he is the head of ua) but Tom's next flick after MI3 the drama Lions and Lambs bombed also it was not well recieved by critics. Next stop Valkyrie did not bombed but barely, yes it was not made to be a blockbuster but it was delayed to get in the oscar race of that year and failed at that as well.
-
Orzi and Kurtzman have pretty shitty resumes too but they still put out a good product with MI3. Though I liked MI3, I also found the idea of having a franchise with tonally different entries and new directors each go around, so I hope MI4 can keep that trend up and not just do another big budget echo of Alias. I remember way back when there was talks of an MI project that was going to be helmed by Fincher then that was passed on to Carnahan, before ultimately being dropped altogether. I wonder if either of those two guys would be interested in taking another stab at it?
-
it was Robert Redford's.Valkyrie didn't do great but I think it did as well as it did because of Tom Cruise. In between those movies was Tropic Thunder and for the most part people responded favorably to Cruise's appearance.
-
The first one was decent the rest well let's say they were at best marginal.
-
As JJ's other two bung boys Kurtzman and Orci. Abrams surrounds himself with some real "winners".
-
Having grown up watching Mission Impossible on TV, I was less then thrilled to watch the team get wiped out at the start of the first film (at least that's what I recall of it anyway).
I didn't bother continuing much with the franchise beyond that. Saw a bit of MI:3 on TV a few weeks back. Mission Impossible is supposed to be a team, it's like watching the A-Team with Face being the only survivor and carrying the show... sure, could be fun but... but... sigh.... -
Season 4 was a vast improvement on season 3. 5 was ok, but not great. Still better than 3.
-
3 was better than 2...which isn't saying much. You know it will be in 3-D, so it will make more than III. I'd expect at least another two or three of these movies.
-
And leave film-making for people who understand that it requires more than just shaking a camera around and hoping an editor can make sense of it.
-
Will Abrams lower his pants for Tom Cruise as much as he did for he former MI movie. Because the latest was "Tom & Kat's Blissful Domestic Life As If A Dumb Spy Movie". And it made me want to puke my guts out. I was actually rooting for the villain to win in MI3, and got extremely disapointed when he didn't. That's a major filmmaking fuck up right there.
-
Pushed back to 2013? Goddamn it. At this rate everyone will be too old to be credible. Quinto and Saldana will suffer the most from this - they're already looking a little creaky. Crap.
-
i had forgotten about that movie. what an overrated piece of horse manure.
-
... is a good excuse. Maybe with so many movies and balls to juggle, Abrams forgets he has to make another TWILIGHT TREK, and it finally dies down forgotten, as it should.
-
Maggie Q is frickin gorgeous
-
To call her otherwise is just... weird! Or gay.
-
that it was obvious that lions for lambs was made for theatre. an operating theatre!
-
not shitting on the prospect, but really, how good can it be..?
-
Whether it's as a producer or as a director, Abrams has the golden touch: LOST (television's greatest mystery), CLOVERFIELD (a refreshing entry to monster movies, which performed well at the box office), MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE 3 (the best entry in the movie franchise), STAR TREK (a major hit with audiences, incessantly entertaining). He's a major creative force in the industry right now...and a good one.
-
Like the Exorcist prequel.
-
Seriously, who wouldn't be excited if Fincher returned to the table and helmed the fourth instalment?!
I'm excited at the possibility of another Mission. The last one was a marked improvement over the second one.
Nobody does intense action hero like Tom Cruise does. Plus it seems Knight & Day is going to be a mega hit to put him back at the top. -
Uh.. Maybe Thunderball? Star Trek 4 was kind of okay... I heard the Bourne films are popular, I haven't seen any of those, but there's 4 of those already, right?
-
Cameron will stick to Avatar like GL sticks with Star Wars. I expected nothing original from Cameron anymore.
-
in part 4 please
-
aren't writing it. Having said that the writers they have got onboard are shit too.
MI:3 was a disaster. Will Abrams ever make a movie that isn't a shit reimagining of a 60s TV show? If he is the new Spielberg as some have claimed (a claim which is, frankly, ludicrous) where is his Jaws? His Close Encounters of The Third Kind? His Raiders of the Lost Ark?
He's a card carrying member of The Hack Pack. -
Fail.
-
I hope Abrams directs and the fourth is just as good. Fuck all those who didn't like the third. You suck.
-
they weren't all that good
And a 5'4" action star is ludicrous -
M:I2 was mindless crap, and M:I3 was very anti-climatic. Hopefully Abrams can get a better script together for his next outing with the Xenu-basher.
It's good to see he's not using Kurtzman and Orci, although it's probably because they're already fully booked up shitting out terrible TINO and Star Wars Trek sequels. -
this is wherea reboot actually makes sense. Let's start at the beginning with Hunt as a young IMF agent on his first mission. Let's do away with Cruise once and for all, his innane grinning and posturing. Reboot this mutherfucker and better yet set it in the Sixties.
-
You do realise real special forces soldiers ie. the British SAS, are all very short, slim individuals who look absolutely nothing like Sylvester Stallone?
-
Just like he did with Star Trek & like he did with MI3.....
MI4=Straight To DVD quality.
Cruise needs this more than anyone else as he is right now on a serious career slide & unlikely to recover despite being a skilled actor he chose the wrong projects & is obviously surrounded with yes men.
-
Still waiting for that perfect MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE movie, so here's hoping they can get a decent director. If anything, maybe the new film will finally get the '80s MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE series released onto DVD/Blu-Ray.
-
is supposed to be about a team, not a James Bond wannabe. Sigh. Why can't they ever get this stuff right?
-
I guess it helped to set expectations low and then be pleasantly surprised when they were exceeded.
That said, I have no doubt that M:I 4 will suck great big donkey dick.
-
I kid! I kid! Oy, it's a blizzard outside... (whistles)
-
And screw the haters, it is the most faithful to the original series of the lot. There was most assuredly teamwork aplenty despite what some folk's foggy memories recall. And so sorry, but the MASKS are part and parcel of M:I. If you don't like the masks, M:I is not for you, it's that simple.
-
Feb 10, 2010 8:39:52 AM CST
BRING BACK DEPALMA!!! HIS WAS THE BEST!!! FUCK THE REST!!!
by tehcreepythinman
-
1) Tom Cruise is in all of them.B) Ving Rhames was in at least one of them.III) Shit blows up.Fore)The one John Woo directed had a really dopey slo-mo motorcycle fight/chase/sequence thing.That's all I got.
-
A truly awful, stupid movie. Way worse than the Transformers movies by a fucking mile. I actually kinda liked John Woo until that piece of shit graced the screen. The plot involved a race against time where the time limit became increasingly less important. Not to mention the silliest motorcycle stunts in history, enough slo-mo to make Snyder feel over indulged, and far more pigeons than should ever be oddly pushed into an action scene. god I hate that movie!
-
A shit ton of fun. It's fast, got a decent plot, and a good sense of humor. It's the best one in the series.
-
Contrary to what some may say, pple DO care about your opinions. I'm glad you brought up their resume so we can now look forward to this with caution.
-
"M:I 4 needs the energy of M:I 3 and the depth of M:I 1"
Good assessment, though to be complete it needs the slow motion doves behind the wall of fire shot of MI: 2
...and maybe a TC dance scene. -
They never tell us what the fuck the object is that they are fighting over.
-
Scientology need more money for the doomsday vault they're preparing
-
Like how in "Ronin" they never say what was in the case that everyone was fighting over. It's just not fucking important.
-
Developed by the brilliant scientist Professor MacGuffin.
-
Something about those Bourne movies makes them only worth a single viewing for me. But I've watched each of the M:I movies more than once. Even M:I2 which is hella weak in parts but also has, for my money, the hottest woman in Hollywood.
-
These writers might not be great, but I wouldn't blame them for the last 3 seasons of Alias. I'd drop that squarely in the laps of the suits (read: dumbasses) at ABC. They pushed for the end of the SD-6 storyline because they thought it was too hard for people to understand, not realizing that the drama came from Sydney working for Sloane. Then after season 3 they said, "Oops, you were right. Get them back working together." even though the premise was ridiculous. Yes, I'm still bitter about it. The SD-6 storyline still had plenty of stories left to be told.
-
I'll take Bourne over M:I thank you.
-
I’m prepared for the fact that I’ll probably get serious flamed for this, but I think the worst movie in the MI franchise by a wide margin is the first one. It was a poorly directed, structurally convoluted piece of crap. I never watched the show, and I know that one of the things people liked about the first one was the cooperation of the MI team. I’m not particularly bothered by the “lone wolf” scenario.
The main thing I like about the second one is the sense of a battle of the titans, especially with the final fight scene on the beach. There’s lots of stuff to complain about, for sure, but at least MI 2 was a straight-forward action movie with a streamlined story and rousing climax (I understand the arguments against this opinion, and don’t personally agree with them).
MI 3 was definitely the best in the series, mostly because of the brilliant Philip Seymour Hoffman.
-
Like MI:2 and MI:3, it was all about Cruise's character. Please please please return the franchise to its roots.
-
Each director (yes Asimov, sorry but even Abrams) brought something good to the series. One thing though, I really want to see a full MI team back in the mix, it's the one thing this series has been missing, although it seemed to be getting back to that in III but not fully.Oh, if this turns into another Star Trek bashing thread I am seriously going to decapitate someone and use their head as a fucking soccer ball.
-
"Man From U.N.C.L.E." movie. Wouldn't you?
-
your bat-shit insanity and cult fervor has ruined your career. get over it. and stop making movies for us to suffer through...
-
JJ Abrams being on a hot streak doesn't impress me. Piss is also hot when it's pissed, and yet i have no foundness for it. JJ Abrams can be all the hot he wants, but he's still piss.
-
The suspense is killing me! And when ethan goes into the 711 to rcv his mission, maybe instead of talqing about slurpee sizes they can talq about slusho sizes!
-
Did not feel like a major Hollywood movie. I would be unlikely to pay to see another JJ movie after MI:3 and Star Trek. His films are WAY too homogenized...
-
And not even a good episode.
-
Maybe they will be VERY CREATIVE, the type of creativety that black holes of talent that are Oric, Kurstzman and Abrams are, and they will call it MISSION IMPOSSIBLE FOUR. As in, having the number writen, not in numerals. Because that's so fucking smart and post-modern and shit!
-
I enjoyed both. Life on Mars was pretty decent as well.
-
Only thing good i can find in the MI3 bulshit piece of shit of movie that is, was they cast Philip Seymore Hoffman as the villain. And he's a great villain not because of anything that Orci, his siemese brother and Abrams did, but because Hoffman is pure awesomeness and he turned a turrd of a chareter into cinematic gold, through his sheer talent alone. that's the only good thing i have to say about that fucking shit of a movie.Otherwise, what's the good thing that abrams brough to the franchise? Tha the turned it into an unholy hybrid of a bad Alias episode mixed with an homevideo of Tom cruise's blissful home life with his new wife? Fuck that shit, man!
-
... the ONLY one of the 3 I can and do watch again. ONLY because of 3 have I any interest in seeing 4. What is with people's negativity here? Seriously, what is going on?
-
I'm learning new stuff every day.
-
Pleeeease
-
Fuck you, Tom.
-
I'm no fan of JJA. The only thing I like that he was involved with is Lost and thankfully he isn't very involved at all except for directing the pilot.I saw MI:3 in the theatre and all I seem to remember was that the action shots were dark and hard to follow and the movie itself was quite forgetable.I loved MI:1 and although MI:2 had it's problems it was still watchable and worth repeat viewings. The franchise has potential but they need to go back to the team aspect like in the first mission in MI:1. Less Cruise and more team. Also, I wish they would go back to their original idea with a new director and vision for each movie. Wasn't Oliver Stone attached to direct at some point? Fincher or Soderbergh would be great too. No TV directors though.
-
Yes, yes, YES! I can't agree with this more. RONIN is a kick-ass action film.
While I haven't minded the one-man-army thing, and could care less about what the TV show was like, presenting the argument this way makes complete sense.
Of course, that would result in the first MI movie with a finely-honed script and non-flashy action, but I can live with excellent dialog and compelling character interactions. -
Tom and Travolta should make the ultimate sacrifice for Lord Ron, and jump into a fucking Volcano. "I have a (waving his hand over his head)...Brain Cloud."
-
The first one was ok, but they decided to make the one known character from the TV series into the bad guy and kill him off (what other franchise would allow that to happen?). The other two were utterly forgettable vehicles for Cruise. End it, now.
-
Wow, sat there in your Mom's spare room, jerking off with one grubby hand and typing on AIC with the other, Lord of WOW, Dungeon Master in the local D&D league, you sure did tell me, wow I'm wounded... right, now I'm off to the gym, then home to screw my wife, then out to have a few drinks with the guys, pity me....
-
C'mon, man. Just because you didn't like a film doesn't mean that everyone who does must be an idiot or have a lack of taste. I like some films and books that others might not like. I thought STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE was highly underrated (although I think that STAR TREK II is the best of the series). However, I don't spit on the opinions of those who do not like STAR TREK. After all, it is merely a persuasion. If you aren't careful, you will begin to sound like some of the far-left wingnuts who like to vilify, demonize and ridicule anyone who disagrees with their agenda. That said: I agree with many of your opinions. However, I thought that MI:3 was a very good film.
-
Just sayin. Where is the new Last Airbender teaser? Man, that movie is looking good right now!
-
I really enjoyed it. Like someone stated above, it was the closest thing to Alias -- in it's prime --but on the big screen.
Problem with box office was 90% the self-induced downward spiral of public opinion towards Tom Cruise that he's still trying to recover from.
There's also the disappointment that while the team stuff was MUCH better than the previous movies, it didn't quite go all the way with it. It was still a super loner agent movie.
These writers don't bode well for the new one, BUT Abrams tends to nail the solid big ideas and we don't know who is directing yet. There's some hope left. -
Wingnuts are far-right leaning. Libtards are far-left. Just thought I'd clear that up for you.
-
Feb 10, 2010 3:21:39 PM CST
VING RHAMES TO HIS AGENT- "GET ME OUT THE TRUCK THIS TIME"
by smokiegeezer32_psn
1st one was great. 2nd rivalled Highlander2 for WTF moment. 3rd was much better. Bring back De Palma and Jon Voight!
-
People who don't like the Mission Impossible movies are clearly members of the Tea Party Movement. And they cannot feel joy.
-
Feb 10, 2010 4:08:54 PM CST
If they CGI MAXIMILLION, I will burn down Hollywood
by smokiegeezer32_psn
Remember this.
-
Showing up in an Abrams thread. Could you be more predictable? Go back to the Nolan thread and gargle his cock some more loser.
-
I'm not paying for star's vanity projects.
-
I would like to see Cruise retire, give us a new star, but actually make it a big ensemble piece like the TV series. I think every flick in this series comes up with a reason to split up the team and have Tommy on his own. I think part of the issue is this is Cruise's way on getting to star in a James Bond movie.
-
You referred to their "creativity" as "post-modern".....now the two will thinq they're all hipsterish (or more so), and jj will be inspired to make another cameo in a faux musiq video with will ferrell or 2010's equivalent of him. Seriously everybody, I don't really have strong feelings positive or negative towards jj's fliqs, but star treq's lensflares in every other scene (ok maybe scratch out other) were bordering on pokemon seizure levels. And to see in the bts features jj playing with that flashlight to add all those lensflares would have him arrested even after the faqt if star treq hadn't made $.
-
makes me feel uncomfortable with the direction its going. Yes, I know nothing of the story but I am familiar with Alias and life on Mars.
-
Right Asimov?!
-
You haters are just jealous because he's happy and smiles a lot and that reminds you of the hot chicks that smirk at you when you look at them.
-
Someone get him to do an X-Files movie. Sorry Carter, you blew it twice!
-
Or any other capable actor of a similar type. Cruise and his crazy pronouncements and disturbing agenda turned me off so bad I didn't want to watch him anything again when M:I3 came out. Nothing has changed since then except that he looked oddly appropriate in a Nazi uniform recently.
-
I don't know if Cruise is a "pretty damn good actor" or not. I know that he's decent enough. My problem is that he just doesn't interest me as an actor. Viggo Mortenson, Liam Neeson, Matt Damon, Ed Harris, Tim Robbins, Morgan Freeman, even Kevin Costner, shit - even Harrison Ford if he could figure out how to be a good actor again - those guys interest me. Cruise just... doesn't. Never has. I liked him most in Collateral when he was playing somebody that wasn't at all "Cruise-like".
-
...and you're DISPARAGING them!? Good God, Martial Law has a level of cheesy awesomeness that's rivaled only by that legendary show, Walker Texas Ranger. Hell, them writing Martial Law alone gives them a free pass for the rest of their lives, as far as I'm concerned.
-
Writers who kill everything they touch, working to develop an actor's idea. Sounds like a nightmare waiting to happen.
-
the only person who didn't enjoy the successful star trek revamp. can't say I like any of the mi movies though.
-
..enjoy the new Trek. He's just the only one who's completely bug fuckin' mental in his hatred for it. And if anything could be absolutely 100% proven about movies at this point it's that "success" has nothing to do with the general AICN populace giving a film the proverbial thumbs up. Just look at Avatar if you need any further explanation of that statement.
-
Avatar is a well made film by a director who understands 'cinema'. Abrams is a TV director who doesn't have a fucking clue about shot composition or editing. Just shake a camera about and edit it so fast that no one notices nothing cuts together. That's not film-making.
-
Maybe you haven't read any of my past posts here at AICN. I'm anti-new Trek (but for different reasons than most) and pro-Avatar. My point is that the "but it's popular" argument doesn't hold water anymore. Avatar is clearly popular yet there is still a very vocal (and very large) group of people who hate it. So in that context I think it's time for some of the people who keep professing how impossible it is for anyone other than Asimov to dislike the last Trek film to get a clue. A lot of people really, REALLY hated that movie.
-
One to sit and watch with a bunch of mates while on the piss. You've got all the stupid slo-mos, Tom Cruise flipping around mid-air, and Dougray Scott trying to put menace into everything he says: "I...need...to...go...to...the...loo", fucking funny shit.
MI1 and MI3 were both good, especially 3 - although they still keep following Cruise's character around, he at least is working with his team most of the time. And I like the Rabbit's Foot thing - like Ronin and Pulp Fiction, everyone keeps referring to what's in the case, but you never know exactly what it is because it just doesn't matter.
And for all you froward nerds - I enjoyed Star Trek and Avatar equally. Ok, I might have enjoyed Avatar a little more because of the 3D. It's a technical marvel with a very predictable story and some questionable acting (well, that just describes every James Cameron movie!) - but I'd like to see how I feel after I watch it on blu-ray, to see if the 3D was just a gimmick. I've seen Star Trek a few times now - it's still a fun romp, although the holes in the story become more apparent over time. At least it was a bit unpredictable on first viewing, mainly because they seemed to be making it up as they went along!
Anyway, bring on MI4! At least Cruise still doesn't look too old, unlike Brucey boy or old 'Arry!
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 419 total posts 209 posts
- WTF HOLLYWOOD: SOLARBABIES -- 131 total posts 129 posts
- Herc’s Seen Tonight’s Return Of THE WALKING DEAD!! Discuss Also DOWNTON ABBEY, FEAR FACTOR, PAN AM, ONCE, SIMPSONS, DYNAMITE, LUCK, SHAMELESS, BAIT CAR, THE GRAMMYS And More!! Sunday Is Sweeps Day 11!! -- 123 total posts 122 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 124 total posts 58 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 191 total posts 47 posts
- Avid Comic Reader Hercules Does Battle With Tedium During Kevin Smith’s COMIC BOOK MEN! -- 43 total posts 43 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 60 total posts 42 posts
- I am The Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day! No, I’m the Behind the Scenes Pic of the Day! -- 27 total posts 27 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 506 total posts 26 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 77 total posts 24 posts