Logo

Cool News

Ivan Reitman has said he's directing Ghostbusters 3!

Published at:  Jan 13, 2010 11:34:50 AM CST

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. MTV just interviewed Ivan Reitman on the red carpet for The National Board of Review and he dropped the bomb that not only has the first draft of the script for Ghostbusters 3 been turned in, but he's going to be directing.

Click here to read the full story and see the Red Carpet video!

How cool is that? The old team back together for another outing! I know we're in an abused housewife state with our childhood favorites being revisited poorly, but I can't help but feel giddy at the prospect of a new Ghostbusters film directed by Ivan Reitman and starring Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Harold Ramis and Sigourney Weaver... and even Rick Moranis has said he'd come out of retirement for a Ghostbusters 3!

Now I just hope and pray that the entire focus isn't on the new generation of Ghostbusters. I don't mind new blood, but I want to see the real Ghostbusters kicking ass for more than just a scene or two.

What do you folks think of this development?

-Quint
quint@aintitcool.com
Follow Me On Twitter








    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:35:40 AM CST

    FIRRRRRSt

    by 20goto10

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:36:08 AM CST

    I know, childish

    by 20goto10

    but hey, FUCK YOU!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:37:16 AM CST

    Good shit!

    by azlam orlandu

    I love what I played of the new game. And I think everyone here wants to see Ghostbusters 3 as long as it's done well.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:37:33 AM CST

    I don't want to see a "young Ghostbusters" movie

    by darth voodoo

    If Stallone can play Rocky + Rambo at 60 these guys can be Ghostbusters for the entire movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:37:36 AM CST

    Ryan Gosling as Oscar...

    by redfive!

    They need good casting for the next generation,if its seth rogen and the typical schmoes its not gonna work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:38:52 AM CST

    AND PLEASE GOD...

    by redfive!

    NO MICHAEL CERA,NO MICHAEL CERA,NO MICHAEL CERA.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:39:06 AM CST

    Rick

    by anything but tangerines

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:39:30 AM CST

    Slimers gotta eat....

    by 20goto10

    I aint afraid of no film studio cashing in on rampant nostalgia.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:41:04 AM CST

    the problem wit fan boys...

    by yourstepdaddy

    ...you dont want anythin "new" or "younger" even though we're gettin older as people and a entertainment culture...I mean, Spider-Man did start off in high school

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:42:14 AM CST

    abused housewife state?

    by i87d

    can you be any more dramatic? (yes, you can -- i'm thankful you didn't use the word "rape" this time in connection with a sequel).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:42:36 AM CST

    speakin of slimer...

    by yourstepdaddy

    ...remember that ep of South Park wit the internet messin up? then Stan jacked off (and jizzed all over himself)...never laughed so hard at masturbation (sorry Jim from AP)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:44:49 AM CST

    My super ex-girlfriend anyone??

    by bluelou_boyle

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:45:28 AM CST

    Ivan might as well phone it in with the rest of em

    by six demon bag

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:46:04 AM CST

    Super ex-girlfriend

    by bluelou_boyle

    That movie was awful. EVOLUTION was mediocre. Not a classic, but not as awful as everyone thinks. He needs a good script.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:47:26 AM CST

    So torn... I mean, I want another Ghostbusters...

    by harrycalder

    ...but bluelou_boyle makes an excellent point...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:47:27 AM CST

    Just reboot it sony

    by six demon bag

    Or is that AFTER this film.....jackasses

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:47:29 AM CST

    RICK!

    by anything but tangerines

    MORANIS!!!!!!!!
    THIS IS EPIC NEWS!!!!!!!!!
    He's like the Daniel Day-Lewis of Comedy

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:48:04 AM CST

    IT'S BULLSHIT!!!

    by kjl451

    You damn well know it's going to be focused on the new generation of Ghostbusters. Seth Rogen, Jonah Hill and Danny McBride. It's unfortunately going to suck a fat one, too. Just do a sequel with the original cast. Show the guys getting old and hating life. Please?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:49:59 AM CST

    Paul Rudd

    by rogerthornhill

    I'm going ahead and saying it... the estranged son of Venkman. He becomes a Ghostbuster to find rekindle his relationship with his dead dad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:50:11 AM CST

    Sweet!

    by trancer

    Just hope they can actually bring this things together.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:50:17 AM CST

    MOTHER PUSS BUCKET.

    by hobocode

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:50:34 AM CST

    Wait... MORANIS is on board????

    by wes_reviews_

    When did this news break??? AWESOME!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:50:38 AM CST

    Uhh Kindergarten Cop anyone??

    by ten_thousand_watts_a_day

    I rest my case.
    Reitman is king.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:52:48 AM CST

    DON'T FUCK THIS UP

    by turketron_2

    The first Ghostbusters is a perfect movie, no half-assing this one guys.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:53:20 AM CST

    My Super-Ex Girlfriend

    by kevinwillis.net

    Wasn't poorly directed, so much as perhaps poorly scripted. But it wasn't a horrible movie. Evolution was actually kind of interesting. Though I'm a nostalgia hound--I'd love a Ghostbusters 3 that really pulled in the story from the first movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:54:23 AM CST

    Ivan should get his son to do it

    by beetlegeuse

    i really want this to be good but it probably won't


    p.s. fuck you jay leno!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:56:24 AM CST

    Shia LeBouf To Join Dad Bill Murray

    by kevinwillis.net

    On one last ghost hunting adventure before passing on the proton pack. There will be a few cast changes. Sigourney Weaver's roll will be taken over by Karen Allen, and instead of playing Egon (who will now be played by D.J. Qualls), Ramis will be playing the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man. Dan Ackroyd has already started shooting heroin so he can get back in the jumpsuit.This is gonna be an awesome movie. In 3D!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:01:07 PM CST

    I so desperately want it to be good...

    by jackalcack

    ...but I'm sure it won't be.

    Apart from Ernie Hudson, the Ghostbusters are so old and fat. It could be such a fucking car crash.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:03:19 PM CST

    Redfive!, featuring Oscar in this would . . .

    by nice marmot

    . . . force me to remember the sequel . . . AAAAARRRRRGGGHHHH, my brain! It hurts!!!! IT HURTS!!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:04:52 PM CST

    Pshaw! Why not make an E.T. sequel too!!

    by cory849

    Some great movies should just stay great movies. Ghostbusters 2 proved that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:05:44 PM CST

    Write the idea of Ghostbuster franchises into the story.

    by royston lodge

    That's the perfect way to write in other Ghostbusters without making it a stupid "passing-of-the-torch" story.
    My perfect concept for a Ghostbusters 3 would have Venkman's prediction that "the franchising rights alone will make us rich beyond our wildest dreams" coming true.
    Venkman spends more and more time focusing on the corporate side of the business, managing the franchisees and counting the money.
    Meanwhile, something nasty is happening in the spirit realm, and since the Manhattan branch of the Ghostbusters are too busy making money to pay any attention, New York is ironically the least-prepared city in America to defend against the threat.
    Giving the New Jersey branch, run by Seth Rogan, Shia LeBeouf and Jason Mewes (or whatever), a chance to save the day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:06:35 PM CST

    Blah!

    by darth_kaos

    That's all I got to say. It will be one of the worst movies the year it comes out. I hope, no. . .pray, it crashes and burns and never sees the light of day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:10:50 PM CST

    Will the ghost be "Dan Aykroyd's comedic timing?"

    by yackbacker

    Because that's been dead for decades.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:12:48 PM CST

    On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sat on a thron

    by darkartist

    I think the combined goodwill garnered for the videogame, the Zombieland cameo and the bluray release of the first Ghostbusters has made everyone forget how truly asstastic the 2nd one was. Vigo has got to be one of the lamest ghosts ever committed to celluloid, worse than Casper, Ghost Dad and all those S&M freaks on the John Carpenter version of Mars

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:13:12 PM CST

    My Super-Ex Girlfriend was, in fact, horrible

    by daggor

    Bad script, the cast wasn't funny, and the direction didn't help a smidge. Let's all remember the insultingly bad animated credit sequence, shall we? Back on-topic, the real GBs need to be heavily featured in this to be worth my while.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:13:14 PM CST

    Vigo Speak!!

    by darkartist

    On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sat on a throne of blood! What was will be! What is will be no more! Now is the season of evil!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:13:28 PM CST

    Royston Lodge

    by darthsynn

    I was all for your idea until you mentioned casting choices. Especially Shia. He doesn't need to be a part of every franchise.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:13:40 PM CST

    Rick Moranis

    by heyscot

    I hope he comes out of retirement if it's right for him, but I'm not expecting him to come out of retirement for this. . .according to his Wikipedia entry, Reitman says Moranis won't be back.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:15:35 PM CST

    I've probably seen the original GHOSTBUSTERS...

    by flickapoo

    ...thirty times.I've seen GHOSTBUSTERS 2 once.Hard to catch that lightning.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:16:29 PM CST

    When's the last time...

    by revenge_of_fett

    Reitman did anything worth a shit? His last 2 films were My Super Ex-Girlfriend and the ABYSMAL Evolution!I don't know why we're supposed to be excited by this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:16:53 PM CST

    Blues Brothers 2000

    by six demon bag

    be careful what you wish for

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:18:30 PM CST

    ...there was almost a good movie in SUPER EX...

    by flickapoo

    ...it was extra frustrating because you could feel the fun flick trying to get out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:19:33 PM CST

    Royston Lodge

    by tightlines

    That is not a perfect concept. That is retarded. The perfect concept would be to have characters from The Office take over. Can you imagine Jim, Dwight and Michael as Ghostbusters? Shoot it documentary style. I would pay to see that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:21:11 PM CST

    We all know this will be

    by magnus greel

    Ghostbusters 3-D!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:24:10 PM CST

    Hasn't he said this before? Still no GREEN LIGHT though.

    by v'shael

    The movie still failed to materialise.
    Call us again when a studio green lights the movie, okay?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:26:33 PM CST

    But will Bobby Brown return for another theme song?

    by darkartist

    Because that's all I care about, although I doubt the remix will be as energetic as the sequel because of Bobby's coked-out mouth. Motherfucker looks like he's suffered about twenty strokes within two years

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:27:26 PM CST

    So you're not excited about Ernie Hudson coming back?

    by jettl93

    Why leave his name out of the returning cast you are excited for? Thats straight up racist man. Not cool Quint

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:27:57 PM CST

    yeah, but look what happened w/ Indy 4

    by herbwestaustin

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:31:58 PM CST

    This film will not happen!

    by dr_buggerlugs

    And shall I tell you why? Because Sony will decide to take the Ghostbusters back to their roots and set it during their high school days. And then those characters will get bumped to the third act to
    make room for Jay Leno.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:32:52 PM CST

    No, nobody gives a fuck about Ernie Hudson

    by revenge_of_fett

    I spent most of his screen time thinking "Why is this guy in the movie?"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:32:52 PM CST

    A Homeless Ray Parker Junior weeps for joy.

    by tonagan

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:33:00 PM CST

    Ivan Reitman

    by gseif7

    I'm with those who are concerned about Ivan Reitman's track record of late. I think you have to give him a chance with this film, but I also think it's fair to be apprehensive about it as well. Quite frankly, I figure they owe us a good Ghostbusters movie, because the second one is among the worst sequels I've seen. It was REALLY bad!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:35:17 PM CST

    Evolution is a guilty pleasure of mine

    by templesweeper

    Though I must admit that the directing wasn't so hot and some of the jokes fell flat. But I still found the movie to be pretty fun. But that was probably mostly because I liked the cast. But My Super Ex-Girlfriend was pretty lame. Hopefully the script will be too tight to screw up.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:36:31 PM CST

    darthsynn: My choice of cast was meant to be sarcastic.

    by royston lodge

    Not the cast I want, but rather the cast I expect to end up with. Heh heh heh . . .

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:37:13 PM CST

    Awesome way to handle "new generation" junk...

    by redflash

    So what you do is introduce this new hip group of college kids to carry the torch in the first half hour. You have them training with the old crew and improving the gear and looking all bad ass. The media is hyping them up and the town loves them. They then go out on their first call and the whole lot of them gets wiped out! This brings out the "real" ghostbusters who bail everyone out once again, despite being "out of date". It would definitely be a different take on things and could be pretty hilarious!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:38:06 PM CST

    In the next Ghostbusters movie . . .

    by royston lodge

    . . . the guys sparkle when exposed to direct sunlight.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:38:13 PM CST

    He Should Give This One To His Son To Direct...

    by media messiah

    ...as a vote of confidence!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:39:05 PM CST

    Hope Mutt swings with the monkeys!

    by kikuchiyoboy

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:40:14 PM CST

    Not a bad idea, Redflash

    by darkartist

    I still wouldn't want to watch that movie but the idea is hilarious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:41:08 PM CST

    Because YEAR ONE was so awesome!!!!!

    by kid idioteque

    No, seriously... that flick was pretty bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:44:21 PM CST

    This is such a lame idea.....

    by dasher

    I don't want to see old OR new Ghostbusters. I just want to see new ideas, for God's sake. Put all those guys in a room and have them come up with an original comedic premise. As with some of these other revivals of old franchises (Indy being the chief culprit), they waited much too long to do this movie if they were really serious about doing it. Just seems like these guys are gonna be cashing a check to pay for their grandkids' tuition. Doesn't Murray owe alimony to someone?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:45:33 PM CST

    redflash: Good idea in theory, but I wouldn't go to see it.

    by royston lodge

    In theory, that's a hilarious idea. It reminds me of the beginning of Josie and the Pussycats movie where the boy band is killed off right off the bat. (only funny part of that damned movie)
    But it would fall apart in the execution. Here's why:
    In order for the joke to be fully realized, the fact that the "young ghostbusters" are killed off in the first act would have to be kept a big secret.
    That means that the advertising campaign would have to focus heavily on the hot young actors chosen as the new team, and play it up like a "passing-of-the-torch" story.
    Which means the advertising would make the movie look like the sort of piece of shit we're all expecting it to be. Then we'd hear by word-of-mouth what really happens.
    The alternative would be to spoil the "big joke" beforehand. But if everybody knows the joke before they even see the movie, then what's the point?
    But in theory, I think it's a hilarious idea.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:45:58 PM CST

    WE NEED THE ORIGINALS - Not "new kids"

    by mennen

    Come on everyone - The reason this franchise works so well is because of the chemistry of the leads - not the FX or "popular new faces" - It was the story and actors... The original actors.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:46:25 PM CST

    Ernie Hudson delivering the line

    by battle_royale_with_cheese

    "That's a BIG Twinkie," got a HUGE laugh when i saw this in the theater (yeah, I'm kinda old).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:46:35 PM CST

    Busting does not exist in this dojo

    by cobra--kai

    I'd say go down the TROPIC THUNDER road with this one. Reteam Jack Black, Ben Stiller, and RDJ as the new GHOSTBUSTERS. Bring the old crew back for a cameo (anyone thinking these guys have still got the 'mojo' and generational appeal to carry a summer blockbuster is sadly wrong imho).
    Go high budget, with never-before-seen fx, and 3D imax - and maybe, just maybe you'll pull off a sensation like the first movie managed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:46:54 PM CST

    Ernie Hudson should be the Gov. of NY in this

    by yackbacker

    Seriously, that would be an awesome twist. Like when they let Sulu captain the Excelsior in ST VI.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:47:25 PM CST

    Vince Vaughn

    by kesoze4

    Would make a good Ghostbuster.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:47:36 PM CST

    Ghostbusters 2 is awesome

    by ugg

    not as good as the first, but not far behind, the music, the baddy, the ooze, awesome. I have high hopes for this, but serious reservations about the "new blood"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:49:18 PM CST

    Ramis and Ackroyd

    by magnus greel

    will be running neck and neck for the "As fat as Brando Award".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:49:24 PM CST

    Super Ex is awful.

    by rev. slappy

    Who the fuck cast Luke Wilson in that? Luke Wislon is void of any charisma or screen presence. He's even lame in those commercials he's doing now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:50:32 PM CST

    Director

    by magnus greel

    When does the James Cameron for Ghostbusters thread start?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:51:45 PM CST

    I like Ernie Hudson.

    by veebeeyes

    I recently watched Snoop Dogg's Hood of Horror, and Ernie Hudson gave one of the best performances in the movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:52:16 PM CST

    You ever notice that Luke Wilson has a brother named Owen

    by jettl93

    yet in Star Wars Luke Skywalker had an uncle named Owen? I've spent many a sleepless nights pondering that little nugget

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:52:58 PM CST

    Ryan Gosling as Oscar?!

    by gilkuliehe

    Fuck you I'm not that old.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:54:20 PM CST

    Shouldnt Jason Rietman do this?

    by mst3kpimp

    I didnt care for GB2 and that was a kajillion years ago. dont have much hope for this. At Least Jason seems to be in his prime and hungry.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:54:28 PM CST

    Rick Moranis too

    by ugg

    fuck it I'm sold

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:56:38 PM CST

    Killing off the kiddies...

    by redflash

    I agree that executing this idea would be tough, but I think it could work if the focus of the trailers is a lot of good comedy from the original team, not making it feel like they're secondary characters in a "pass-the-torch" movie. Maybe you even have a clip where some ghost baddie is mocking and laughing at the new team, playing up the idea that no one really wants new ghostbusters. You set it up as a "next generation that no one really likes or wants" kind of film. It opens the door to a lot of good comedy moments, especially if you have the two teams go out together a little bit and have all kinds of conflicts.

    It's not a great idea, but for how much I like Ghostbusters, I don't see anyway to make this something more than a money to leech off of good old nostalgia. I don't want grandpa ghostbusters and I don't want the twilight version either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:56:38 PM CST

    Never got the GB 2 hate

    by judge dredds fresh undies

    Certainly not up to the standard of the original but its still very enjoyable, not an incomparable failure like Blur Brothers 2000 for example.
    I seriously cant imagine this new one will be any good though, we can but hope.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:57:25 PM CST

    I have a scene in my head where . . .

    by royston lodge

    . . . Dr Peter Venkman is on-stage at a Franchise Expo somewhere in the midwest, hawking the opportunities for wealth-generation that come with owning your very own Ghostbusters franchise.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:57:30 PM CST

    Ghostbusters 2 was awesome? Did we watch the same thing?

    by darkartist

    And what exactly was awesome? The James Lipton-esque melodramatic posturing of Vigo? The Bobby Brown cameo? The runway model Statue of Liberty sequence? The bubblegum rivers in the NY sewer? The Casperiffic antics of the Scoleri Brothers? The uneven pace? Sigourney's shrieking every five fucking minutes? Help me out. What else was awesome?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:58:19 PM CST

    GB3 - 4 Years TOO LATE

    by squashua

    Should have been done with Stiller, Wilson boys, Ferrell and Vaughn as the next generation.
    Now we might get stuck with the Apataw crew or younger.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:58:57 PM CST

    Casting

    by magnus greel

    with all the jiz being spread for Anton Yelchin on the Spiderman talkback, I thought someone would be all over that by now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:59:19 PM CST

    Darkartist has a point...

    by abominable snowcone

    GB2 was lots of fun, but didn't compare to the original.
    Which may be a good thing--GB3 has a chance to improve the franchise and be one of those rare third installments that betters the movie that came before it instead of continuing a downward spiral.
    In other words, the bar set by GB2 really isn't all that high, so I'm not worried just yet.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 12:59:34 PM CST

    Rick Moranis

    by forsakyn

    He's great. I hope he's back for it. Of course, I also hope it doesn't suck.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:00:51 PM CST

    Redflash: I guess you could do the Goldmember thing...

    by royston lodge

    ...where they had all the famous actors do cameos at the very beginning.
    But to make your idea REALLY funny, the new team would have to be more than just cameos. We need to see their characters develop, and work hard at succeeding, right before being unexpectedly killed at an inappropriate moment.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:02:43 PM CST

    sweet!

    by uglylittlespud

    will his son have a cameo like in GB2?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:08:52 PM CST

    I don't like Harold Ramis

    by mortsleam

    I do not like him. http://tinyurl.com/yeldjhy

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:20:33 PM CST

    Good.

    by americanwerewolf

    Now, if he can just recapture the charm and cleverness of the original for a new era, that would be a fine thing indeed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:23:00 PM CST

    no subject

    by brigon

    They should save the "Young Ghostbusters" story for Ghostbusters 4 (the reboot).
    All the youth we need to see is the four of them training up Oscar, to carry the flag for the future films.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:24:03 PM CST

    ITS NOT GOING TO BE FUNNY.. ANYONE SEE YEAR 1?

    by dirtysanchezxxx

    Ok, you need an Apatow or someone like that (SuperBad, Knocked Up, 40 year old Virgin.. or whoever did Sex Drive, Hangover & I Love you man)...

    Reitman hasn't been funny since the 80's.. Ramis (whom I'm a big fan of) hasn't been funny since the 80's..

    I'm not a h8r.. just don't want this movie to be not funny like Ghostbusters 2..

    Have them challenge the four horsemen of the apocalypse.. that'd rock (I know ,it was in the cartoon-and is one of the best episodes!).

    Anyone see Year One? If you saw the trailer you saw all the best parts. It was really bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:31:42 PM CST

    If Moranis is really back then I'm in!

    by gorgomel

    and make a sequel to Little Shop of Horrors

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:33:06 PM CST

    Well Sony DOES need a new tentpole next year...

    by jabbathegriffin

    with Spidey gone. I'm just sayin...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:45:06 PM CST

    I think the original cast needs a trip to FATBUSTERS first.

    by revenge_of_fett

    Seriously. Harold Ramis and Dan Aykroyd are in a competition for largest pelican neck-pouch. These fat fuckin' bastards are going to look retarded bobbling around in the jumpsuits.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:49:52 PM CST

    Ghostbusters go to hell

    by 10thdoctor

    no "goes to hell" story ! please !

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 1:56:56 PM CST

    SCALEERI BROTHERS!!!!!

    by pissed off and bitter

    Well hopefully they have a good story. I remember reading about the Shrek sequels and some dude who worked on the films went into reasons why they felt they should make more movies, like why Shrek was in the swamp, why he was alone there, why we should give a shit, and why it it's all pointless moviemaking.... Hopefully GB3 hits it outta the park...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:05:10 PM CST

    MORANIS or NOTHING

    by manifestchaos

    I will await confirmation of this confirmation before I get excited about GB3.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:07:43 PM CST

    GB2, Super Ex and Year One

    by beatsme

    All awful--need some new blood.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:10:36 PM CST

    All "FIRRRRRSt" posters must die...

    by skyway moaters

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:13:43 PM CST

    I would see this if they meet 4 demands:

    by bixbysnyder

    1.They have a solid enough plot.

    2.Dan Aykroyd is a genius of lucasesque proportions with LOADS of ideas. USE YOUR BULLSHIT FILTER ON HIM REITMAN.

    3.If all the original crew is back and it doesnt seem forced.

    4.They throw WOODY HARRELSON into the mix as "the new guyTM".


    And if they shoot it in 3D. Not a dealbreaker if they dont...But seriously...That would be awesome.

    Ps. Only thing WRONG with GB2(in my book): Viggo should have been DRACULA.

    There, i said it.



    Ps 2. The game ROCKS. They got Max Von Sydow as VIGGO ffs!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:17:15 PM CST

    Wait, Rick Moranis said he'd be in Ghostbusters 3?

    by thenorthlander

    When did this happen??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:20:41 PM CST

    No love for Ernie Hudson Quint?

    by ganymede3001

    "Girl, I'll believe anything as-long as the paycheck is good"

    Reply to Talkback

  • ...which kicked unholy ass, especially when you consider its "film tie-in" nature. Wonder how much better a movie sequel can possibly be than the game. As far as I'm concerned, that one *IS* "Ghostbusters III."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:21:41 PM CST

    they should have a different story for once.

    by meadowe

    They only time imo that the same story over and over in a franchise has worked is in Die Hard (terrorists/criminals looking like they have some lofty purpose for their crime when all they want is $). And whereas the original ghostbusters theme and to a lesser extent Bobby Brown's contribution "On Our Own" to part 2 were coo' songs, I would like to see Lady Gaga do a song and video for this fliq. Lady Gaga + supernatural comedy theme = pretty interesting imo.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:23:13 PM CST

    do.......ray.....egon!

    by meadowe

    Classiq bit ;)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:23:30 PM CST

    "New" Ghostbusters should be killed in first 5 minutes

    by br1947

    by all means, get bunch of hot young "it" actors, play it up with them, then have them killed (or at least hilariously incapacitated for the entire movie)requiring the originals to come out of retirement to face the threat. Have Venkman bitching about being on a boat in the Caribbean. It'd be a beautiful thing done that way

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:25:09 PM CST

    BixbySnyder

    by thenorthlander

    Dracula instead of Viggo? That's actually a crazy awesome idea.
    3D though, I don't think so. No matter what people say, I still believe 3D will go away as always. Even if it won't, 3D right now is still used as a cheap gimmick. Even in Avatar they couldn't stay away from throwing things at the audience or poking at the audience. It'll take years until 3D is so widely used that it won't take you out of the moment, but just be there in the background without you noticing it.
    And once THAT happens, what's the point of having it??

    My point is, no matter how they would do it, if they shoot Ghostbusters 3 in 3D, it will date the film tremendously.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:29:50 PM CST

    Yessss REVENGE_of_FETT...

    by skyway moaters

    ALL film actors should be thin, and YOUNG. So as to better represent the cinema going [American] audience.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:32:30 PM CST

    Yes, Vigo sucked, but...

    by docpazuzu

    ...Ghostbusters 2 had JANOSZ! The Janosz/Venkman interaction was comedic gold, especially the look on Venkman's face when Janosz gives him that creepy handshake.

    C'mon, in the deluge of sequels we've had over the past 25 years G2 is still pretty fucking solid.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:33:47 PM CST

    I hope you're right, Northlander.

    by americanwerewolf

    I've only seen one 3D movie (that would be Up), and it didn't do a damn thing to enhance my experience. The movie would've been perfectly fine without it. I am sick of hearing about new projects coming out in 3, and wish it would fade and stay dead this time. It's just a gimmick, and like most gimmicks, it's annoying.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:35:28 PM CST

    DocPazuzu ftw!

    by blest

    "Why am I drippings with goo?""Ok, ok! The joyfulness is over."Janosz was awesome.Hoping for the new GB flick to be good, but we'll see...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:37:45 PM CST

    Ganymede3001

    by thenorthlander

    You mean: "If there's a steady paycheck in it, I'll believe anything you say."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:38:42 PM CST

    Harold Ramis can't stop grinning because his brain is melted

    by darthpigman

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:40:35 PM CST

    DocPazuzu

    by thenorthlander

    Ghostbusters 2 isn't bad, but...
    Quote 50 lines from Ghostbusters.
    Now quote 4 lines from Ghostbusters 2.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:42:15 PM CST

    Woody Harrelson.

    by davidwebb

    That's an idea I could definitely go with. MAKE IT HAPPEN.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:42:23 PM CST

    Well then American Werewolf...

    by skyway moaters

    ... you need to see AVATAR. 3-D's potential gloriously realized. I reccomend IMAX if you can manage it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:44:16 PM CST

    Northlandeer

    by blest

    I just gave 2 above, but here goes:"Why am I drippings with goo?"Ok,ok! The joyfulness is over.""Better late than never.""I should've been your daddy."...actually rather sad, that one.GB2 is nowhere NEAR as good as the original Ghostbusters and I haven't even seen it in 10 yrs, but I can still remember some parts of it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:44:16 PM CST

    Please be original...

    by badboymason

    What we don't need is either: A) Ghostbusters coming back out of retirement, half the movie spent getting them back together and a "hilarious" scene of them being too fat for their old suits. B) A young crew of new Ghostbusters taking the torch - when has deliberately introducing new characters to take over a franchise EVER worked: they tried it with Blade 3 (the "Blood Pack"), Indiana Jones 4, The Mummy 3... and the spin-offs either never came or never will.

    I'd much rather GB3 take on a "Wrath of Khan" look at aging - not in a serious/gritty way but that these guys are still capable of doing what they love but are questioning how long they can keep going. Maybe one new guy who helps them, but not in a "cool new guy way" but just a guy who is a little younger who they hired at some point. And any new comic talent they hire has to fit in to the style of the existing guys which, despite the ludicrous situations, is pretty naturalistic dialogue and jokes. So that means no Jonah Hill, Stiller, Owen Wilson etc. but someone like Jason Bateman could work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:46:45 PM CST

    Just Be TRUE for ONCE!

    by darkplanet

    I know that these talkbacks are akin to screaming into the wind but PLEASE, just this once, be true to the original movie! FORGET about rebooting the franchise! Just make a good Ghostbusters movie and let the boys go out in style. Kill them off saving the world, ANYTHING but please oh please, don't spend half the movie dwelling on the "next generation" predictable bullshit.

    Be true to the spirit! Let old Ghostbusters BE old Ghostbusters and let them battle it out even with the problems of age. That is comedy gold right there!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:48:08 PM CST

    From the Director of "Year One"...

    by the_patriot

    God help us all...can't we find a director who remembers how to get humor and timing out of actors before moving on with this? Ack.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:48:20 PM CST

    Hire Huey Lewis for the GB Theme song!

    by zardozap2005

    When Ray Parker Jr. ripped off "I Want a New Drug" so shamelessly and then they privately settled out of court, this would be perfect payback.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:49:16 PM CST

    Skyway Moaters

    by thenorthlander

    I've seen Avatar in 3D. Twice. Both times, all I could think was that I would prefer to see it in 2D.
    There's so much poking and throwing stuff at the audience just to show them it's in 3D that I find it absolutely amazing some reviewers claim there's none of that. At one point, there's an extreme closeup of Giovanni Ribisi POINTING with his huge 3D FINGER, right at the camera.

    "Ooooh! Look! It's in 3D! We're watching a movie, and it's in 3D, and the 3D is kewl!"
    How about just telling a story and create the three dimensional space with a great sound mix instead? That's a much more subtle way of putting people in the action without taking them out of the moment.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:50:59 PM CST

    Has anyone seen pictures of Murray, Ramis, etc.?

    by james_camera_on

    They look awful. It is going to take some serious special effects to turn these guys into action hero's again. I mean the producers may want to do that motion-capture animation thing and just keep the eyes and voice of these guys. As far as Ghostbuster's 3-D, yeah that is probably the way they will go. The producers are going to be spending a bundle on this so they might as well go all out. But personally, I fear the worst. GBII should have been a slam-dunk, but it wasn't. This is the same team and their track record is much worse now. Hide your eyes, people. Barring a miracle, this is going to be a disaster.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:51:27 PM CST

    I just can't get excited for this

    by tomdolan04

    I love me GB1 and heck even have a fondness for 2. But after years of hyped properties getting resurrected and disappointing on both their own merits and in comparison terms, it's over. I WANT it to work but new fresh faced characters we're supposed to gel with will be forced in when all the paying public will be there to see is the main four.

    It's interesting about the game though. That WAS a solid attempt however whilst admirable it worked because of the format. On it's own merits storywise it was just a hodgepodge of fan-references but it looked good, played great and you could fulfill 8year old dreams of firing a proton pack. Ahem.

    Oh and **** 3D. IMMERSIVE STORYTELLING YADDA YADDA YADDA. Plot? Characters? Good dialogue? Nope it's all about 3D now, cos it's hip. Honestly - would the original Ghostbusters have got made today? I mean Bill Murray's no looker. WHOSE THERE FOR THE KIDS TO RELATEZ TO? Forget a liquor drinking Slimer, odds-on for a 'comedy' Jar Jar Ghost in this one. And expect Bill Murray for a 10minute cameo where he streams out constant sarcastic wisecracks ala the videogame. Look at GB - people popularily miss that Venkman (and the others) had genuine pathos and depth in places of the film, alongside the wisecracks. Ordinary guys you could have a beer with. Not superheroes. Not athletes doing cartwheels. When they fell down - you cheered when they got back up because it wasn't a CGI fest.

    Call it something else at least. Let it go guys.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:54:17 PM CST

    BLEST

    by thenorthlander

    Start writing down quotes from Ghostbusters 1, and you'll see how many you can think of and they'll all be better than the ones you could remember from the sequel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 2:54:54 PM CST

    TheNorthlander

    by bixbysnyder

    Thanks man! I've actually speculated that Aykroyd came up with Dracula as the badguy for GB2 since i saw it.

    Reitman and who knows else probably reigned him in though.


    Like i said, -No 3D- Would not be a dealbreaker. For me. But even though i really dug AVATARS Fx and the 3D...i kept thinking about OTHER movies that i would like to see like this.

    Lucas is (according to one of the biggest tabloids here) magazines here)already converting his SW movies(1-6) and Jackson is supposedly doing the Rings trilogy.

    Since they are gonna have lots of CGI(letsfaceit)ghostly fx zooming into the camera...

    Well...This would seem tailor made for this flick.

    Still Story should be number 1.

    Im warming up to having some sort of "new team" if they were something like br1947 suggested.

    Maybe competitors?

    Maybe they could be led by Walther-Dickless-peck? Would be nice seeing that guy in a GB jumpsuit!

    Shit, im getting ideas as im typing this up! Im going for a smoke and i'll see if i can come up with a decent story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:00:03 PM CST

    RAMIS DIRECTED YEAR ONE!!!!

    by themcflyfarm

    not Reitman. Don't know why some of you are so confused.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:10:31 PM CST

    Ernie Hudson was in Ghostbusters...

    by rocklobster800

    to make the line "I've seen shit that will turn you white!" the classic piece of dialogue that it is...my favourite line in the movie. that and "Egon this reminds me of the time you tried to drill a hole through your head. you remember that?""that would have worked if you hadnt stopped me"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:11:09 PM CST

    Really happy about this BUT NO NEW GENERATION!!!

    by hint_of_smegma

    Please God, Ivan - make it about the original guys only. No new flavour of the month bratlings please, just the guys and for heaven's sake make sure Rick Moranis is one of them, as well as Peck. One last hurrah for the GB's, not a sneaky introduction to shitbag tween idols that no-one who is older than 16 wants to see.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:18:29 PM CST

    Well, there is goes out the window - Reitman SUCKS.

    by professor_monster

    This movie will wish it was GB2.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:18:38 PM CST

    Northlander: While I won't discount the validity...

    by skyway moaters

    ... of your personal experience with Avatar 3-D, I have to completely disagree with your assessment. Don't get me wrong, I have talked with a couple of people who reported experiencing dizziness, disoriention, and even nausea while viewing avatar 3-D. But they belong to a tiny minority. Sort of a "certain percentage of the population" kind of thing. I found the use of 3-D in Avatar to be almost totally transparent and almost completely immersive, with little to none of the " LOOK AT THIS! IT'S 3-D!" crapola that has been the hallmark of pretty much ALL 3-D movies prior to Avatar. In short I found Avatar to be the first film that successfully uses 3-D as an immersive techique vice being a distracting gimmick.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:20:18 PM CST

    I am nervous about this film...

    by haggardatbest

    But if they have to do a sequel and it HAS to be about new recruits, I would attempt to cast any of the following: Aziz Ansari, Jason Segal, Dave Chappelle, Will Forte, Danny Pudi, Tony Hale, Jeremy Renner (top choice as the cocky Bill Murray replacement, but will never happen), Rich Sommer, and possibly Ed Helms, although be would be best used as a William Atherton type. Actually, you know what? Just keep Jonah Hill and Michael Cera away (love him as George Michael Bluth, but enough is enough) and it might get my $12.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:22:46 PM CST

    TheMcflyFarm

    by haggardatbest

    They bring up the horrendous "Year One" because the writers of that "film" also wrote GB 3.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:24:31 PM CST

    Umm, damn . This seems to be trend for me lately...

    by skyway moaters

    ... that last post should have been directed at American Werewolf(?) Or Northlander and American Werewolf both? *shakes head* My head hurts....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:25:01 PM CST

    Oh...

    by haggardatbest

    I didn't see the guy who actually does think Reitman made "Year One," which is absolutely worse than anything Ivan has done. Ramis is a hero of mine, but he royally screwed up with that dreck.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:25:53 PM CST

    benicio del toro and vincent gallo as GHOSTBUSTERS

    by six demon bag

    or FUCK OFF!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:28:59 PM CST

    Don't bother with the Vigo hating

    by motherpussbucket

    you are like the buzzing of flies to him

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:29:18 PM CST

    Make "Stripes 2" at the same time.

    by pixelsmack

    Back to back...that always produces great films......eh'hem.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:31:13 PM CST

    Thanks for the recommendation, Moaters.

    by americanwerewolf

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:31:13 PM CST

    What about Tracy Morgan?

    by haggardatbest

    "I got a tattoo on my ding dong that says 'Stove Top.'"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:36:30 PM CST

    Ok, uh, yeah.

    by bixbysnyder

    I think i have come up with an angle for Gb3:

    First however...If someone comes up with something...cool on the internet...Will they use it? I remember reading that Bruce Campbell was going to play Mysterio in SM3.

    But the fans online figured it out. Or somesuch, so it was dropped. True or not...

    IF someone comes up with a good story/plot point/casting online.

    Will they use it anyway? Or would they drop it?

    Does anyone know anything about the legal side of stuff like this?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:37:47 PM CST

    Rick Moranis can eat shit

    by alienindisguise

    the "team" got back together for Indy4 and look how "great" that was. That shit means nothing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:42:55 PM CST

    Hey Doc...

    by skyway moaters

    ... how you izz? Whatchew think about this current crop of "AICN regulars"? Erm, never mind. Good/comforting to see you still in the fray after all these years...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:43:13 PM CST

    I would fear a reboot

    by bramton1

    You know Disney would get involved and it would be the Jonas Bros. as the Ghostbusters.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:44:33 PM CST

    BixbySnyder

    by haggardatbest

    Just don't let JettL93 see it, he'll write the script immediately and take it directly to Reitman. They will then throw out the original screenplay and use JettL93's. That guy knows EVERYONE (although now he will post something like, "Actually haggardatbest, I don't know Ivan personally, but I do know Jason. We golf together sometimes. Great guy.") Seriously though, I love JettL93. We golf together sometimes. Great guy. HELL of a script doctor!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:48:26 PM CST

    Ivan has NOT made a good movie in over 20 years....

    by nuking the fridge

    Sorry to say, even though on paper it sounds great. The man has not directed a good movie in over 25 years. Ghostbusters 2 is widely known as being a piece of shit. And the only other movies close to being decent after filming the original Ghosbusters(1984) are Twins and Kindergarten Cop, mostly due to the idea of Arnold Schwarzenneger turning a a comedic performance. His filmography is pretty recently is pretty bad. I really hope he knocks it out of the park, because I loved the original Ghostbusters.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:51:14 PM CST

    Shouldn't they do GB 2?

    by burnednotice_dude

    Oh, yeah. I forgot about that green turd.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:52:37 PM CST

    And the flowers are still standing!

    by blanket-man

    OK, I'm in.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:54:16 PM CST

    Ghostbusters 2

    by luscious.868

    I'm sorry, but I liked it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:55:12 PM CST

    Quint, When did Rick Moranis say he's doing GB3?

    by theoyboy

    I have seen NOTHING of the sort from any source.

    Could you link us with some, you know, actual sources.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:57:45 PM CST

    return of the sta-puft marshmallow man in 3D

    by mynamesdan

    was i the only kid in britain who assumed that sta-puft was a real brand in america?

    I hope this happens. I don't mind that the Ghostbusters are old and fat now- i just hope they still smoke.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 3:57:48 PM CST

    return of the sta-puft marshmallow man in 3D

    by mynamesdan

    was i the only kid in britain who assumed that sta-puft was a real brand in america?

    I hope this happens. I don't mind that the Ghostbusters are old and fat now- i just hope they still smoke.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:00:46 PM CST

    No matter what happens, I'm there

    by soylentmean

    Just thank God Ramis isn't directing...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:09:31 PM CST

    Why does everyone forget Ernie Hudson?!

    by bcom77

    He may have come in halfway through the first movie but he is still a Ghostbuster yet everyone only refers to Bill, Dan and Harold. Even Quint's article above refers to reuniting to "old team" and states every actor but Ernie. Where's the love guys?!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:11:44 PM CST

    we don't need this shit

    by candy ass monkey suit

    We really don't need a new Ghostbusters movie. Out of all the revisitations of old films this excites me the least. Dont get me wrong i love Ghostbusters but it was very much a film of its time and lets face it..they are all getting on a bit now!! very much like Harrison ford still doing Indy!!. Both the Ghostbusters guys, and Ford with Indy, left this shit far far too long and after 25 yrs does anyone really still care? Its pretty safe to say the film won't be that great? These are the same writers that did the dreadful "Year one" with jack black last yr which was fuckin awful and the ghostbusters game wasn't much cop either devised from a script by Akroyd. Lets leave this one be please.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:13:32 PM CST

    You weckom Wolfman...

    by skyway moaters

    You bein' serious?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:19:29 PM CST

    "see the real Ghostbusters kicking ass"

    by photoboy

    I really want to see a film about the original Ghostbusters too. I don't mind new supporting characters, but the focus has to be on the originals. And no fucking torch passing like allegedly happened in Indiana Jones 4.

    I really hope GB3 rocks. The game last year was pretty cool, if a little derivative by revisiting Gozer and Ivo Shandor from the first film, but it totally made you feel like you were a part of the Ghostbusters team.

    Holy fuck, Quint, you forgot Ernie Hudson. That's seriously not cool.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:19:47 PM CST

    Skyway Moaters

    by thenorthlander

    I don't suffer from any physical discomforts from 3D. I just don't like it because it's distracting. It takes you out of the story every time you realize it's there, and every time you don't, there's no point in having it.
    And believe me, there are TONS of those "lookie lookie 3D" shots in Avatar. I pay close attention to camera work and storytelling because it's part of what I do for a living.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:21:52 PM CST

    Who wants to see old and fat Ghostbusters? So sad.

    by onin solstice

    I prefer they live on in my mind as young, vibrant paranormal investigators and eliminators. Seeing a whale sized Egon, a chinless Ray and a white haired Peter would hurt my inner child. Can we still make this a CG film?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:25:21 PM CST

    It can't be worse than Indy 4, right?

    by soylentmean

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:28:52 PM CST

    i hope they don't get all cgi on us

    by thesmilingpsycho

    stick with puppets!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:28:55 PM CST

    Don't worry, SoylentMean

    by thenorthlander

    Not much could be worse than Indy 4.
    Except maybe Indy 5.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:29:13 PM CST

    Simple script shape for GB3

    by fungomcgurk


    Have the old crew featured for at least half of the screen time and a next-gen/newbies thing for the rest. I WANNA see the people who made the other films fun; the continuity feels as important as it can for a GB movie, heh. OTOH, sure, the franchise has new potential, if they go in a totally different direction for new monsters, side from the standard ghost device we'd expect. Besides, we're not going to see Olivier resurrected in CGI to play Professor Nerdsworth, so let's see 'em build on the old with some New that ISN'T a tedious retread. If you're going to refresh it, take a risk or two and give it a sharp new tux instead of patched-up overalls. GB has so much potential for shoehorning in any mythos you care to lampoon, I'll casually cross my fingers for it to be massive. They sure have the right people for giving that idea a boost. Also, when you see any Muppet action, remember that all of 'em but for Big Bird and Snuffy have a fist up their bums. YODA TOO, first thing. That'll make some people happy to read, ho ho!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:31:11 PM CST

    bcom77

    by bixbysnyder

    The love is self written.

    Us emotionally stunted geeks here just have a hard time expressing love. Unless drunk on JB of course.

    And i have some love for GB2 too dammit!

    Max Von Sydow was Vigos voice.
    (and once more in the game too)

    And hey, haters. it beats Transformers 2 right?

    Still, my dracula speculation would have rocked. Dracula would have been cooler than Vigo. IF it was so.

    Bah who knows. Hmm. Anyway.

    Yeah on 3 im gotta say that PECK is the key here.

    He was missing from 2 and made it in essence: More Ghostbusters.

    Without Dickless.

    Shit JettL93 and his 3D goggles sees everything.

    Oh well, fuck it then.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:34:45 PM CST

    You REALLY think this is a good idea?

    by tinkertiw

    GB2 sucked, you expect everyone's comic chops have gotten better 20 years later? I love Murray, Aykyrod, Ramis, Reitman, et al, but c'mon...!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:35:23 PM CST

    Best news I've heard all day

    by cletus van damme

    Fucking awesome

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:35:52 PM CST

    Gotta have Ernie Hudson, too.

    by jimmy rabbitte

    I hope (as Quint stated) that there is isn't too much focus on younger "hipper" Ghostbusters.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:37:45 PM CST

    Northlander: Still have to disagree with you about...

    by skyway moaters

    3-D. I didn't notice any of "the moments" you refer to, which I readily admit exist in virtually every 3-D film prior to Avatar. My take is that they got it "right" with Avatar; for the first time in cinematic history.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:37:51 PM CST

    Northlander: Still have to disagree with you about...

    by skyway moaters

    Avatar 3-D. I didn't notice any of "the moments" you refer to, which I readily admit exist in virtually every 3-D film prior to Avatar. My take is that they got it "right" with Avatar; for the first time in cinematic history.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:38:08 PM CST

    Jason Reitman Would Be Better

    by chitownsbest

    Not sure if this is good news or not since he hasn't made a good movie since Junior which was something like 12 years ago. I agree that his son might actually be the better choice now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:38:11 PM CST

    I have a GB3 concept

    by vadakinx

    It's a bit vague but essentially it starts off as the complete polar opposite of the beginning of GB 2. 20 years later, the Ghostbusters are a massive franchise with branches all over the country. The Ghostbusters themselves are all retired millionaires, living the good life, with hundreds of teams across the country (or the world) working as part of the franchise.


    In New York City however, a Ghost Busting enthusiast has creating trapping technology that is more efficient than Egon's designs and far better at catching ghosts. The Ghostbusters decide to sue for copyright infringement, not wanting any competition in the Busting business, especially competition that may be better than them.


    Of course the city goes to hell and the original Ghost Busters have to come out of retirement and work with the new guy to save the day.


    As I said, vague. Essentially Ghost Busters 2 started them out at rock bottom so I wanted to see what it would be like for GB3 to start out with them at the top of the ladder, rich beyond their wildest dreams. I don't really have a specific evil in mind right now for them to fight, my vague concept was more about the Ghostbusters themselves.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:39:00 PM CST

    Side question:

    by blest

    As comparisons to old films being made into newer updated versions go, how's this:What's worse StarWars EP 1 or Indy IV?Thoughts/opinions?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:41:28 PM CST

    Goddamn 'smart'phone...

    by skyway moaters

    Sorry for the double.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:43:57 PM CST

    the cameras

    by six demon bag

    they were looking at me!QUIT LOOKING AT ME!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:45:35 PM CST

    I like both

    by vadakinx

    I like Indy IV. It's a fun film. A bit silly at times but the Indy films are full of silly moments. Ok Indy IV went a little over the top but it was still a fun film and I have no problem whatsoever with aliens being in it.


    As for Star Wars Episode 1, I was 14 when it came out. I'd seen the originals before it and loved them and Ep 1 was just a continuation of that. Again there is silliness and the earlier drafts of the script are a lot better, but Phantom Menace is a film that gets better with age and while it may not have reached the heights of Empire and A New Hope, it did what Star Wars movies set out to do - it entertained and told a story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:52:19 PM CST

    vadakin, i implore you

    by larry sellers

    To watch everything wrong with The Phantom Menace http://www. youtube.com /watch?v=Fx KtZmQgxrI

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:54:14 PM CST

    Focus on the old...

    by killianx

    but pass the torch if we want to see GB4 and so on..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 4:54:21 PM CST

    great news!!

    by sherlock_junior

    Bring it on!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:00:29 PM CST

    Ghostbusters too old for this shit...

    by human_bean_juice_

    sounds funny as fuck.
    Seriosuly, try not to laugh when an arthritic Murray tries to put on that proton pack and slide down a pole.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:02:26 PM CST

    Bunch of gags about old people

    by larry sellers

    Looking forward to it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:02:49 PM CST

    MORANIS OR NOTHING

    by gophertrace

    YES! get this sentiment going we all need a little more Louis Tully in our lives. MORANIS OR NOTHING!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:03:04 PM CST

    Ok Vadakin,

    by blest

    what about the PT as a whole?Better or worse than Indy IV?Anybody else wanna weigh in?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:06:02 PM CST

    Zool uses 'red matter'

    by smokingrobot

    to create an 'alternative time-line' with a younger, better looking Dr. Venkman. Vulcan is destroyed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:08:40 PM CST

    I met Ernie Hudson once

    by smokingrobot

    At the 'Electroniques Boutique' at Northgate Mall in Seattle. He thought I worked there and asked me the price of something. He's pretty short in real life. Nice guy, though. True story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:14:35 PM CST

    I can see it now..

    by starchildad

    The ghostbusters are on a mission and die in the first 5 minutes. Then they are in spirit form for the rest of the film assisting the new ghostbusters to help them pass on to their afterlives all the while making money on small jobs. Please god, NO. They are gonna fuck this up. I can pretty much do a JettL confirm and tell you that the script is most likely done already and it sucks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:15:44 PM CST

    I liked GB2 alot

    by jacksbloatedpayroll

    But I was 11 when I saw it soo.......

    I'm not hoping for
    much outta GB3, which usually translates to I'll enjoy it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:15:56 PM CST

    This is awesome news!

    by jamie mcbain

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:16:49 PM CST

    GHOSTBUSTERS 3

    by bixbysnyder

    Yeah, ahem...

    THE CODEX GIGAS(google it), gets stolen, while on loan from Sweden to NY's METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART w DANA BARRETT now as manager she tips them off.

    The THIEF is WALTER PECK aka Dickless and his plan is to use it to (finally) get his revenge on the GB.

    (Basically, PECK uses the book to get in touch with the devil and makes a deal with him.)

    You have your real world enemy(dickless) and the ultimate supernatural one. SATAN.

    Rest of the story pretty much goes as vadakinX mentioned.

    With WOODY HARRELSON as "the new guyTM"

    You happy now JettL93?

    You happy?

    Just send me the check.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:20:36 PM CST

    Bah, clarifications:

    by bixbysnyder

    Forgot this(Yes, JB):

    "w DANA BARRETT now working as the manager of the METROPOLITAN she tips the GB off, to avoid a scandal.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:23:36 PM CST

    If the Studios are listening - I don't want a young Ghostbusters

    by alice cooper stalker

    Throwing in too many characters is a key ingredient to screwing up a movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:35:53 PM CST

    Rudd/Hader/Corddry

    by jaysin420

    would be perfect....just please no more Seth Rogan.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:36:05 PM CST

    Shia LeBoeuf to play all 3 young Ghostbusters...

    by darth_inedible

    They're going to do it Klumps style with Shia playing the girl, the fat guy and the nerd all at the same time. It's gonna be fabulous!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:38:14 PM CST

    If anyone dug my "MacGuffin"

    by bixbysnyder

    You can study it online:

    http://tinyurl.com/ov8khg

    And with that, im off to bed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:42:20 PM CST

    ****NO STUPID IDEAS ALLOWED IN THIS TALKBACK****

    by gibsonusa returns

    I love talkbacks and talkbackers generally are quite insightful, with great ideas...
    ...EXCEPT when it comes to Ghostbusters. For some reason whenever a GB article comes up the results are the stupidest of ideas.
    Seth Green as a Ghostbuster?
    Will Farrel as a Ghostbuster?
    Chris Rock as a Ghostbuster?Please, spare me this time!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:44:47 PM CST

    BIG LOB

    by gibsonusa returns

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:48:19 PM CST

    Michael Cera as Rick Moranis' WACKY nephew

    by canvasseamonkey

    He will explain what is going on aloud in a goofy douche manner the WHOLE MOVIE

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:49:24 PM CST

    Sam Worthington as the soulless GB!

    by canvasseamonkey

    They can attempt to capture his soul the whole movie!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:49:34 PM CST

    Moranis + Comeback = My Blue Heaven 2!

    by jaysin420

    God I wish

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 5:54:41 PM CST

    this will be about as good as Indy 4

    by rupee88

    and it will probably make as much money

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 6:11:27 PM CST

    They should name it GOATBUSTERS-

    by sal_bando

    -and star everyone's fave Abrams Trek fan from Almada. Yes indeed it's time to Blast a few Goats open. Which our friend from Almada does 100 times a week. Way To GO there Krusty.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 6:31:57 PM CST

    IVAN READ TALKBALK FORUMS!

    by dirtysanchezxxx

    I mean, it's pretty much a given that comedy from the 80's to 90's to 2000's have changed quite dramatically... PLEASE read the comments here as it's obvious not many people appreciated/liked some of your latest films, or Ramis' directorial stuff as of late.
    Stripes, GB1, all great movies.. but PLEASE do your homework and consult the new 'it' guys for comedy these days... Zombieland is also a huge plus..

    BIGGEST concern.. the Year One writers... didn't anyone tell them the movie wasn't funny? lot of great opportunities to be funny but their writing was terrible.. the jokes.. everything.. and you're going to trust these guys to write what fandom has been clamoring for decades now? why not pick someone with a good track record????

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 6:40:17 PM CST

    i got a bad feeling about this.

    by el borak

  • Jan 13, 2010 6:51:05 PM CST

    I'L CALL IT RIGHT NOW

    by kwisatzhaderach

    This will be fucking atrocious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 6:53:47 PM CST

    Indy 4 and two out of three new Star Wars movies...

    by heckles

    ...sucked any hope I had for revisting old movie franchises.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 6:56:16 PM CST

    PLEASE DON'T PUT MICHAEL CERA IN IT

    by jolaz

    Seriously. This has the potential to be greatness. I seriously hope he doesn't put Michael Cera in it though. That kid is a serious buzzkill. Not to mention the fact that he's a one trick pony. I'm sick of him playing the same character over and over. If Mr. Reitman can keep from putting him in the flick, it could totally be awesome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 7:01:18 PM CST

    who you gonna email twitter??!!!

    by waka_flocka_flame

    GHOSTBUSTERS!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 7:01:54 PM CST

    i fucked that up

    by waka_flocka_flame

  • Jan 13, 2010 7:07:58 PM CST

    casting suggestions for next generation GB's

    by ian216a

    i'd either shadow the original and go for SNL types again - maybe Andy, Fred and Bobby, or, still sticking with TV comic actors Dwight from the office, Chuck, and the tall guy from Big Bang Theory.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 7:16:29 PM CST

    BIG LOB... lob big? bigg lobbber...

    by skyway moaters

    ... lobbber big BIG LOB BIG LOB BIG LOBBBBB. BIIIIIIIGGGG LOOOOOBBBB LOB BIG BIG LOB BIG LOB BIG BIG LOB BIG LOB BIG LOB BIG LOOOBBBB... There you go GibsonUSA, I've just taken care of your next 20 posts. PLLEEAASSE give it a rest. It wasn't funny the first 300 times. And, YES, and DO know what you're referring to. But, PLEASE, get another schtick, BIG LOB is making my freakin' eyes bleed...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 7:22:47 PM CST

    Ummm...not good.

    by hesiod2k

    Get someone like Shawn Levy to do it. Someone with a fresher approach.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 7:27:56 PM CST

    I hear Sam Raimi might be available.

    by hesiod2k

    Admit it. GB3 directed by Raimi would be the shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 7:31:56 PM CST

    This is one sequel I would love to see happen with all the origi

    by moonlightdrive

    the original Ghostbusters are the main leads in the film. No new/young etc. Ghostbusters. They're not needed or wanted.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 8:02:08 PM CST

    Think smaller.

    by gibsonusa returns

    No Ghostbusters being some kind of huge franchise. Thats stupid.
    Ghostbusters always had an intimacy about it...3 guys starting a business in New York.Keep it that way.

    Don't bloat it up into some huge, global franchise...everything will be lost if its too big.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 8:02:15 PM CST

    Finally A sequel with hope!

    by annie the pod racer

    amongst all the rubbish/reboots out there. Good news today!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 8:22:12 PM CST

    I am cautiously optimistic!

    by blackwood

    This is a potentially exciting announcement! I feel measured hope and careful expectations!I expect this feeling to last until the next announcement!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 8:55:07 PM CST

    Why all the hate for Viggo?

    by murdermostfowl

    I thought he was great in Hidalgo and Lord of the Rings. You guys are just too harsh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 9:04:42 PM CST

    Why GB1 worked

    by murdermostfowl

    It was the perfect balance of drama and comedy. and more importantly at its core, it is addressing thigns every 6-12 year old experiences in their life... the fear of the unknown, fear of their possibly being ghosts and spirits that are out to get you and that you don't have to be afraid. This movie convinces you that spirits are real and brings back those fears we also cultivate in films like poltergeist , and every good 80's horror flick and then instead of suffering, this movie does what we all wish we could do... kick their ass. Tackle your fears. The movie does this through other concepts that we trust and yet fear in a different way as a society... technology and science. There's even the token fear of the government meddling in your affairs ( think "parents" in a child's mind ) In the end the movie basically says that we can conquer any fear because they've "got the tools... and the talent".... that's why it worked so well.Don't ask me to explain GB2.. it didn't work and I have thought about it so many times and I don't know why. Every time I see it in small doses, I keep thinking "why did I think this movie was bad?" and then I watch the wole thing and it just feels wrong... but I never can put my finger on it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 9:22:43 PM CST

    The REAL Ghostbusters

    by hillvalley

    I agree that a "next gen" plot would defeat the purpose of making another Ghostbusters, but so would putting Ayckroyd and Ramis in any kind of scene displaying heroics. They are each roughly the size of Ecto-1. And while Ray could plausibly have let himself go, I just can't accept a fat Egon.How about an animated movie, in the style of the 80's cartoon, but with the original film cast as their voices?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 9:30:42 PM CST

    They Will Animate it in 3D

    by autodidact

    Count on it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 9:33:57 PM CST

    Or Not

    by autodidact

    Never count on anything.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 10:05:55 PM CST

    Rick Moranis!

    by criticalbliss

    Yes! I now look forward to this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 10:14:38 PM CST

    not a scene or 2 but a whole movie

    by beyondthunderdome2girls1cupbillcosby

    where they say funny things, and have hired new recruits waaay long ago so it doesn't become some boring cookie cutter recruitment picture (the exception is police academy 4 citizens on patrol)but has a new exciting ghost plot to focus on instead.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 10:21:50 PM CST

    Michael Cera and Paul Rudd as ghostbusters

    by dallaspatrick82

    I hate the idea of new ghostbusters as much as anyone, but if thats the rought their headed at least cast the right people, i could easily see Paul Rudd and Michael Cera as quirky younger scientists that could fit into the world with the right direction. please god no ben stiller, just in general, he needs to stop making movies..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 10:22:39 PM CST

    "abused housewife state" ?

    by jawsphobia

    Please. Are we crying about Indy IV involving 1950's trappings, a UFO and a zany escape from a nuke? Some "fans" just need a slap in the head.

    There's every chance a new Ghostbusters might be fun, and I'm sure they know the original protagonists have to be the focus on this one. Love the rumor that Venkman becomes a ghost. Sounds like a dignified bow.

    We've got people just lapping up Sony's whim of rebooting Spider-Man while thinking it's the end of the world if actors revisit their signature roles later in life. Indy, Rambo, Rocky, McClain, all well served so far.
    I can tolerate introducing current comedy names to the Ghostbusters, since that would happen in the story-reality anyway. But whatever disposable follow-up happens with an all-young cast, the Ernie, Dan, Bill, Harold, Sigourney reunion is good news.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 10:55:41 PM CST

    Apatow Crew = OUT, everyone knows The Hangover Crew is king now

    by beyondthunderdome2girls1cupbillcosby

    until the next hilarious crew arrives

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:09:27 PM CST

    Who needs the young Ghostbusters?

    by manatee

    This isn't like some ancient television show that hardly anyone has heard of; this is freakin' Ghostbusters! Hasn't everyone heard of this movie? Even if they haven't seen it, I guarantee even the most idiotic teenager has HEARD of Ghostbusters. Besides, with Bill Murray being a ghost or some such shit, there's no need for anymore twists. Just focus on a good story with funny gags and everyone, even teenagers, will come to see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:14:32 PM CST

    What about Ernie Hudson?

    by williamzabkarox

    The article failed to mention Ernie. How come Winston is always the forgotten Ghostbuster? Also...does Slimer return too?


    And to those that feel revisiting these old franchises are like pissing on childhood mememories...WOULD YOU RATHER SOME OTHER IDIOTS REMAKE THE FRANCHISE? I'll take Ghostbusters 50 over a remake. Now I must also agree I don't like the idea of a new team of younger Ghostbusters (or Bill Murray as a ghost)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 13, 2010 11:24:08 PM CST

    People already hate this before it's made

    by williamzabkarox

    I think people already will think this is a bad movie. People already have their minds made up because they know it won't live up to the original, and you are probably right about but again, it's GHOSTBUSTERS 3. The original cast and the original director are back. I know it won't top or come close to the original, might be along the lines of the sequel (and I was 11 in 89 so I liked the sequel because it felt more like the cartoon) but like I said, this is better than a remake/reboot. Indy 4 might not have lived up to expectations but it was a fun movie and thankfully wasn't a remake. Lower your expectations. I think we all know by now recapturing the magic is damn near impossible but it still doesn't mean this will be a bad movie. If you are expecting the magic from the original to return YES, you probably are going to hate this. Your childhood is not being shit on. A 3rd movie, no matter how good/bad it is doesn't harm the original. The Star Wars prequels, while very flawed were good on their own but never made me feel Lucas shit on my childhood. I knew it would be damn near impossible to strike gold like that again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 12:10:17 AM CST

    Geezers make great action heroes. Want examples?

    by missing dink

    You'll find a fair share in these films: Star Wars. Kung Fu Hustle. Lord of the Rings.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 12:16:51 AM CST

    RICK MORANIS

    by chrisface2000

    i seriously want to know when the Rick Moranis confirmation happened. WHERE DID YOU GET THAT INFORMATION?!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 12:24:04 AM CST

    NOOOO AVATAR PLEASSSSS

    by pauduro

    I hust hope they dont go NUTS with the CGI love the feal of the firts 2 CGI is to help and ad to the movies not to over take them

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 12:34:43 AM CST

    Am I the only one who loves the 2nd movie?

    by mattmanreturns

  • Jan 14, 2010 1:22:34 AM CST

    I suppose he's as good a choice as anyone, but...

    by the_crimson_king

    Ivan Reitman hasn't made a good movie in a long time

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 2:01:12 AM CST

    ernie hudson?

    by billyhitchcock1

    just as important.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 3:12:49 AM CST

    Ghostbusters is the only good film he's directed

    by ecto-1

  • Jan 14, 2010 3:29:38 AM CST

    I have seen shit that will turn you WHITE !

    by grooveraider

  • Jan 14, 2010 3:57:49 AM CST

    To anyone who's excited about this....

    by smirker

    Has obviously been blinded by sentimentality. Ghostbusters is an AMAZING film, but Ghostbusters 2??? They ride along in the Statue of Liberty that's powered by positive thinking???? That film was OK at best. There were some good bits, like the opening with them doing kids parties to make some cash on the side, but it nowhere near captured the magic of the first movie.

    So. You think that 25 years after making his only really great movie he'll somehow pull this off?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 3:58:59 AM CST

    Jason NOT Ivan should direct

    by williamzabkarox

    Ivan has made nothing but bombs since Ghostbusters 2. He has made maybe 3-4 really good movies, all of which were in the 80's. Jason on the otherhand has TWO Best Picture nominated movies under his belt so far (Up In The Air, Juno) and also directed Thank You For Smoking. PLUS Jason also has directed episodes of The Office and people from that show wrote the Ghostbusters 3 script. Jason would give this franchise a much fresher take than his washed up dad would. My Super Ex-Girlfriend, Junior, Kindergarten Cop, Evolution...enough said. Get Jason and not Ivan!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 4:03:14 AM CST

    Oh yeah and...

    by williamzabkarox

    People are against the Appatow crew being in this but name me the last great Akroyd comedy you saw. Akroyd starred in Britney Spears Crossroads. I actually would have more faith in Paul Rudd or Seth Rogan being funny than Akroyd or even Raimis this days. Appatow also makes far better movies than Reitman or Raimis do these days.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 4:05:14 AM CST

    I love Evolution!!!

    by drsambeckett1984

    Ackroyd is hillarious in that, I'd love to see a sequel to that, but with Duchovny in full Hank Moody mode rather than Fox Mulder.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 4:08:34 AM CST

    no subject

    by snlich

    yeah, super ex-gf sucked. but sometimes directors only work with certain material.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 4:21:09 AM CST

    all the right ingredients

    by potatino

    All the right ingredients to bake the cake. Doesn't mean the cake will turn out all right. Maybe the ingredients are stale or past the used by or the chef forgot how to use the oven. Anyway it won't be the same cake I ate when I was a kid.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 5:59:05 AM CST

    afraid of new ideas...NO SALE

    by potatino

    We get it. You had a good idea when you were young and now you are old and you are afraid to try new things. Well move the fuck oout of the way, your time is over. I'm tired of the same old bullshit.... NO SALE!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 8:19:28 AM CST

    just adapt the video game

    by refutethehype

    that was some funny material, and the voicework felt like old school gbs doing the thing

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 8:23:40 AM CST

    Redflash has it right

    by refutethehype

    Characters played by Robert Pattison, Shia, Sam Worthington and Nick Cannon are in the start of the movie, go to a townhouse, just get their eyes torn out and their limbs snapped off and die horribly onscreen, complete with animated sparkles for Robert, and then you cut to a red phone ringing in a dusty room and you show Dan Akroyd looking up from Chinese food with a shocked expression saying "............IT'S A CALL!' Cue the opening theme music.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 8:24:35 AM CST

    New York, New York.

    by dr_duran

    I'm up for a GB3, but only with the original cast, but something that has been overlooked is New York itself. In the original film NY seemed like big cold unfriendly place, but its not like that anymore, all cleaned up and different, you could even see that in the GB2 crapfest.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 8:27:10 AM CST

    and bill murray as a ghost

    by refutethehype

    would let them revisit lines, like after the Murray ghost kills the characters off I just mentioned, their gooey body parts could drop from the ceiling and he could say "AND THE FLOWERS ARE STILL STANDING!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 8:31:19 AM CST

    Probably a bad idea...

    by pumaman

    I watched the original movies about a year ago, and although nostalgic and cheesy as hell...a rehash of this doesn't seem like it would be fun. Just too friggin forced.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 9:31:44 AM CST

    Star Trek VI v. Ghostbusters III

    by aboriginal

    Like seeing Indy after almost two decades - it'll be a visual shock. The dudes on the Enterprise we're barely keeping it together. This'll be interesting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 9:44:28 AM CST

    Gostbusters

    by wastherewhenitbeganmay1977

    Who cares! This was, at best, a mediocre genre comedy distinguished more by who was in it then by what it did. It is bad enough they are ruining the quality films from our youth, why do we care what they do to the average ones.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 9:56:47 AM CST

    "Ghostbusters is the only good movie he ever made"

    by autodidact

    Uh, helloooo? HEAVY METAL

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 9:56:53 AM CST

    The Ghost of Laszlo Kovacs

    by darktowerjunkie

    Now all the have to do is bring Laszlo Kovacs back from the dead to shoot it and we may have something.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 10:13:54 AM CST

    NEW 'busters should be saved by the OLD guard

    by performingmonkey

    Yes get new 'young' Ghostbusters but we should see them getting in trouble and Ray, Venkman, Egon, Winston have to saddle up and save them. THEY need to be the main stars, along with whoever plays Oscar. The other story, the one they may be going for, is Venkman or all the GB's ending up in Hell and Oscar and the new team going to save them. That story would work but we still need plenty of old-school Ghostbusters action!! CGI Slimer is happening, oh yeah.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 10:21:28 AM CST

    Anything that has Nick Cannon's death in it

    by rogueleader66

    Is an epic success in my book. Cant stand that fucking toolbag. Married to a hot as fuck woman and acts like a school boy who just won the school hottie. Stupid ass Eminem baits him and he takes it hook line and sinker and says shit that makes him look like a fucking 12 year old (Calling Eminem Slim Lamey? OMG that was so pathetic). Kill him, kill him twice lol.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 10:24:06 AM CST

    I hope GBIII is good

    by rogueleader66

    Loved the first, liked the second, could have been better but still solid. Please Reitman, do not make this another Year One, put that debacle behind you, reach back and give us some good old Ghostbusters fun.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 10:42:45 AM CST

    At least it's not his lame ass son.....

    by thewaqman

    Jason "gimme some Oscars" Reitman. I'm looking forward to this, but I'm not as hyped for it as I am for other come-backs (like Gibson's and Arnold's inevitable comeback).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 11:16:50 AM CST

    Too self-aware...

    by darth macchio

    I think that's why latent sequels never work. The new material is so blatantly self-aware of the old material, it may as well be a caricature of the previous work.Of course, I'd be thrilled to be wrong but my guess is GB3 will be ass.Or, at best, of 'Evolution' comedy (was that Reitman or Ramis? Ramis right? Didn't Reitman direct a really shitter recently? Too lazy to imdb it).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 11:38:15 AM CST

    the return of ECTO COOLER

    by turketron_2

    One good thing that can come from this movie. Are you listening Hi-C!?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 11:44:14 AM CST

    plot:

    by beyondthunderdome2girls1cupbillcosby

    they're working for some military science section of the government and the government cuts them loose after they finally steal the ghostbusters secret plans for the ghost containment system and create their new team of super slick super soldier ghostbusters, 4 of them or so. so the ghostbustrs are out on their own and flat broke and the only thing they got is to reopen the biz and hope to get a few jobs based on nostalgias sake alone. and then on one special job they get stomped by the super busters during a routine busting and become the laughing stock old ghostbusters and everyone loves the new super soldier busters and at the end its gbusters vs the new super soldier ghost busters and the ghostbusters bust the head ghost first and at the end the super soldier leader's like "we did everything perfect ,what went wrong? how did you beat us venkman???!!!" an venkmans like "you forgot one thing pal..we're the ghosbusters" or something funny about him not having a dick and everyone cheers and peter marries dana and slimer and lewis are best man and the other ghostbusters just dance.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 1:23:04 PM CST

    Nepotism

    by lordrando

    i hate this guy just because he backs up his hack fuck son's assertion that he did not gain advantage thru who his father is to become a VERY young director of Hollywood feature films. Because they let all of us do that right? Fuck the Reitmans

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 2:10:45 PM CST

    Ghostbusters 3: Citizens on Patrol

    by axl z

    I always thought Paul Rudd looked like Venkman from The Real Ghostbusters..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 2:26:17 PM CST

    Anyone dug my idea w "the devil bible"?

    by bixbysnyder

    Anyone?

    Or is anyone busy bitching.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 4:09:48 PM CST

    Steve Buscemi should be a Ghostbuster!

    by xxplosive

    "These lightning rod things are fucking cool as shit -- Hey! What the fuck was that?! An ectoplasm?! The fuck is an ectoplasm? I just got jizzed on by a fuckin' ghost ferchrissake! Fuck this ghoul-busting shit! I quit!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 7:11:08 PM CST

    Fuck the old Ghostbusters

    by disco_sucks

    Seriously, if they're going to do it get some new blood in from the start. Okay you'll need to be selective - four from a list of Rudd, William Scott (they had great comedic chemistry in Role Models), Zach Galifiniakis, Anna Faris, Steve Carell, Neil Patrick Harris, Mila Kunis and John Cho.Even if they fuck up the casting, is it really going to be more tragic than seeing the old cast shuffle and shamble about trying to recapture glory days which are now 25 years old and counting? Plump, cuddly Ramis? Sad, bloated Ackroyd? Miserable, lazy Murray? I'd rather keep my memories the way they are, thanks. Just don't put anyone too rubber faced or slapsticky in it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 10:55:51 PM CST

    EVERYONE IS WORRIED ABOUT THE "NEW BLOOD"

    by a g

    SO GET RID OF THE FUCKING NEW BLOOD CONCEPT ALREADY!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 14, 2010 11:45:16 PM CST

    Robert Pattinson as a Ghostbuster

    by emeraldluxury

    Yeah, since Pattinson rumored to be considered for the new spidey, he might as well be rumored to be a ghostbuster too...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 2:25:24 AM CST

    yeah excizing ernie hudson is tantamount to h'causting a race

    by takingscorpioscalls

    he's with them in all themovies, someone has to be the down to earth guy, and he's the only guy who can still maintain a respectable fit in his original outfit and ghost battle boots.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 2:31:04 AM CST

    Ghostbusters II looked visually bland

    by takingscorpioscalls

    I don't hate this movie, there's a lot of great stuff, what with the whole courtroom battle and the crooked cop from scarface becoming a judge, the whole evil river thing, the statue of liberty. What sucked is it started ot get a bit too queasily sentimental with the Dana storyline and also the cinematography lookekd bland, everything was too white, compared to how rich and colorful Ghostbusters 1 was.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 2:51:44 AM CST

    I watched the blu ray of Ghostbusters last night

    by the_crimson_king

    Harry said that he thought it looked too grainy, but I'm happy to report that I have no idea what he's talking about, I honestly don't think he watched the whole thing, I thought it looked excellent

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 2:53:10 AM CST

    by the way has anyone seen Ernie Hudson lately?

    by the_crimson_king

    I saw him in some tv show and man that guy is BUFFED! he looks like he could still kick ghost ass without any trouble at all

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 3:30:45 AM CST

    Another fucking hack reviving past glories

    by asimovlives

    Fuck Ivan Reitman! The sooner this fucking hack stops making movie,s the better. Should had already! Fucking ass!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 5:44:49 AM CST

    Aww AsimovLives

    by bixbysnyder

    I actually have SOME hope for this. Maybe it's entertaining at least. How'd you like my little plot? Or did you think it sucked ass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 3:41:46 PM CST

    Sarah Michelle Gellar as a Ghostbuster - IT'S A NATURAL!

    by mrmysteryguest

  • Jan 15, 2010 5:36:08 PM CST

    Rerelease original Ghostbusters instead

    by finky089

    I'm interested to see a new Gb story, but I know it cannot live up to expectations. Instead, do a remastered theatrical re-release of the original. Put it in 3-D if you have so, but at least we all know it'll KICK ASS since the original movie is...well, KICK ASS!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 5:38:49 PM CST

    Yeah, there's definitely something up with Ernie Hudson

    by finky089

    http://tinyurl.com/yj9g5oc

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 15, 2010 9:51:05 PM CST

    Ecto-1

    by the_crimson_king

    you are now realizing what an absurd statement that is, ever heard of a little movie called Stripes?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2010 12:25:01 AM CST

    Agreed

    by williamzabkarox

    Ecto Cooler MUST return to store shelves. Actually I believe it's still available in certain places but under a new name,

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 15, 2010 4:21:52 AM CST

    jcZmipQ

    by tmveqk

    ZcTkKcwd jcZmipQ

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 15, 2010 4:22:35 AM CST

    rAaZQQ

    by tmveqk

    uomAKq rAaZQQ

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback