Logo

Cool News

Wow!! Have A Gander At BBC's TRIFFIDS Footage!!

Published at:  Dec 22, 2009 9:31:58 PM CST

SPOILER ALERT !!

I am – Hercules!!

“The Day of the Triffids” is about a species of mobile flora that develops a taste for delicious flesh after virtually every human on Earth is suddenly and unexpectedly rendered permanently blind.

It began in 1951 as a book by John Wyndham, became a movie in 1962, became a BBC miniseries in 1981 and has become a new 2009 miniseries that hits BBC One on Monday.

The new version was written by Patrick Harbinson (“ER,” “Law & Order”) and stars Dougray Scott as Bill Masen, Joely Richardson as Jo Playton, Brian Cox as Dennis Masen, Vanessa Redgrave as Durrant, Eddie Izzard as Torrence and Jason Priestley (!) as Coker.

To paraphrase Montgomery Scott, “Looks exciting!”

Clippage!








It hits BBC One Monday. Not sure about BBC America.



Follow Herc on Twitter!!





$9.99 Blu-ray RoboCop!!



A $120 Blu-ray Player Hercules
Both Owns And Highly Recommends!!



Cousin? Business Is A-Boomin' Now!!



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2009 9:36:06 PM CST

    A classic story that needs a reboot

    by zinc_chameleon

    because CGI can now create the sentient, *networked* triffids that John Wyndham wrote about in the original. Triffids exhude/extrude enormous amounts of filaments (web?) that allows them to communicate with each other, and perceive/control the environment at a nearly microscopic level. In the book, Wyndham made it clear that humans had lost this war before it started, as we had no way to network at this nearly microscopic/cellular level. Very different from the action/adventure takes. Sea water kills Triffids, indeed. I was insulted by the 1962 ending!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2009 9:49:30 PM CST

    re: A classic story that needs a reboot

    by nippleeffect

    don't give it to the SG: Phew guys

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2009 9:49:55 PM CST

    Need more like a three-day weekend of the Triffids

    by daggor

    With Eddie Izzard? I didn't know Brits could be D-list celebrities.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2009 10:11:23 PM CST

    I saw the original movie...

    by scorchy

    ....on a Halloween night about 8 years ago. It was hilariously bad. I think there was the one part in France, where people were partying in a mansion while the Triffids wreaked havoc outside. It was just awful, but you couldn't take your eyes off of it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2009 10:15:03 PM CST

    Nice

    by aversiontherapy2

    I remember the original series as a kid, scared the bejesus out of me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2009 10:17:58 PM CST

    PRIESTLEY POWER!

    by maxcalifornia.

    Jason Priestley and Vanessa Redgrave...the team-up the world has been waiting for!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2009 11:10:21 PM CST

    Filaments?

    by geoduck42

    You sure you're thinking of the right book? In the edition I read, the Triffids lurched slowly around and communicated (or at least attracted each other) with a sort of stick-and-drum arrangement. I do agree the first movie was awful. The original miniseries was very faithful to the book, but hampered by a minuscule budget. Judging from the clips I've seen, this new version has pretty much tossed the book's plot back out the window. (Triffids with slithering grasping tendrils? sssigh..) Might be worthy on its own merits, but I'm not holding my breath.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2009 11:37:01 PM CST

    But what do they LOOK like???

    by theghostwholurks

    That's the only thing I'm really interested in with this remake.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 12:26:27 AM CST

    Looking forward to this

    by nippleeffect

    hope it ain't a disapointment like SG: Phew is

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 12:57:45 AM CST

    Cool

    by bellam

    John Wyndham is one of my favourite authors. I've always wanted to see "The Chrysalids" done up right.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 1:01:54 AM CST

    Oh, come on -- the original movie isn't THAT bad

    by big dumb ape

    ...well, it's not that bad IF you were born in the sixties and saw it while you were a geek teen growing up in the seventies, discovering it alongside other low budget genre fare like American International's FOOD OF THE GODS and things like that. I mean, come on -- the original was made as a low budget monster movie with 1962 capabilities, so it was always going to have certain limitations. Not to mention it was a British production, so it likewise was one step removed from the way that even low budget American monster/horror films had a particular feel.All in all, as a geek, I'll be curious what they did with this as a remake, so I hope BBC America does get it and soon. Otherwise I'll have to add it to the "hunt this down on DVD someday list"!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 1:20:52 AM CST

    Oh I hope it is a Global Warming parable

    by jbs9200

    Oh, I hope they turn this into a Global Warming parable
    I just can't wait for it to be a politically infused piece of cliqued garbage
    If only we had listened to the plants!!! Why !!!!!
    Will Keenu Reaves be in it?
    ..
    Maybe they'll have some bad guy that causes the Triffids to attack. I bet that bad guy will be a Christian fundamentalist from America (never a fundamentalists can never be Muslim, too non-PC) or maybe a British racist (BNP; again no non-white can be racist). Maybe Jews are the cause, antisemitism is becoming popular enough in Britain that the Brown's government recently suggested prominently labeling products from Isreal (read Jews).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 1:41:42 AM CST

    EDDIE IZZARD!

    by savagejuicebox

    I am so in on that alone!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 2:05:46 AM CST

    jbs9200

    by mulberry

    Hope that was heavily ironic. If not, get a grip. And Merry Winterval..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 3:01:39 AM CST

    THAT was done on a BBC budget?

    by gabba-uk

    Looks pretty good. Oh and jbs9200 why don't you go to a New Years Party with a bunch of black guys who know how to party, get stoned, laid and chill the fuck out. Peace

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 3:43:34 AM CST

    jbs9200

    by monkeymanreturns

    I suspect you'll be joining the British Nazi (oops I mean National) Party soon...you idiotic moron. "Fundamentalists can never be Muslim...No non-whites can be racist"....idiot. And then throwing in a pro-Jew sentiment to cover your right-wing prejudice attitude...hahaha...dumb, real dumb. We all know you did that to somehow validate your hatred. Have you not seen Avenue Q?? Everyone is a little bit racist sometimes...but unlike the BNP, we don't say that one race is superior to another. We don't want all non-whites out of the country. BNP...bunch a racist crooks...never comply with Electoral Commission legislation....and when they were fined a useless £5,000 penalty for non-compliance, actually said that they had no money - despite the fact that their racist record arm makes a million a year and their leader earns £60,000 a year plus expenses as an MEP!!! JBS9200 you are a racist turd!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 3:45:14 AM CST

    Oh...

    by monkeymanreturns

    And Merry Chistmas...you Right wing motherfunker!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 3:52:30 AM CST

    Argh!!!

    by monkeymanreturns

    jbs9200 you have made me mad - quite MAD!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 4:42:22 AM CST

    That looked pretty good...

    by tinspider

    but I suspect the classic sound effect of the triffid from the original BBC series won't make it which is shame as I feel it's as iconic as the tardis sound.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 4:55:08 AM CST

    I hope I'm the first to shout 'PLANT!' when the reviews arrive

    by richard_gere_raped_my_gerbil

    If I'm not, there will HELL to pay. FUCK YOU ALL.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 5:57:19 AM CST

    gabba - they probably used

    by jamf

    the cash they saved from suspending jonathan ross for a few months. haha!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 6:19:41 AM CST

    in the scene in the "orchard"

    by emeraldboy

    Which looks hair raising.... you see something vine like moving towards Ewan Bremner.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 6:20:59 AM CST

    They have kept..

    by emeraldboy

    the triffid sound.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 7:32:34 AM CST

    I hope it crosses over with Day of the Locust

    by tonagan

    And ends with Donald Sutherland as Homer Simpson stomping the plants to death.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 9:11:53 AM CST

    I hope they've nailed it though something tell me...

    by workshed

    ...it won't be in the same lague as the original BBC series. It was the perfect slow-boiler. This one is over two nights. Great cast though. Brian Cox is in it too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 9:22:43 AM CST

    One thing the book had...

    by zinc_chameleon

    was an incredible sense of hopelessness and doom. It was 'The Road' with walking, poisonous cacti.
    And I do remember references to the spores/filaments that the Triffids kept exhuding. One of the characters pondered if that is what made them so self-aware. The clackers didn't seem quick enough. Of course I read the Penguin version when I was a little kid, so maybe I'm mixing it with another story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 9:37:08 AM CST

    BBC = Always Quality

    by judge briggs

    When do we get to see that? Anyone have any ideas?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 10:28:50 AM CST

    Izzard? I'm in...and NippleEffect?

    by captainbass

    Fuck off you wanker.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 10:38:17 AM CST

    Still waiting for a remake of "THEM"

    by triple_j_72

    Not the 2006 film, the 1954 one. Giant ants. Cool, right? I'm joking of course.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 10:45:59 AM CST

    The 'story' looked OK...but the f/x...

    by hugh g rekshun

    ...not so much. Is there a reason why BBC can't produce halfway-passable sfx? Are they affiliated with the Syfy Channel? Are they only granted a few quid and a sixpence or somesuch small monies to produce said crappiness? Are they using an old C64? Perhaps a TI-88. Still...after my griping and carrying-on, I'll watch it if shown here in the Peoples Republic of the United States.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 11:01:53 AM CST

    I knew I paid my license fee for something

    by plinglebob

    At least theres something to watch in the week between the 2 Doctor Who episodes

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 11:44:17 AM CST

    Hugh G Rekshun

    by deusexmachina

    The BBC is part of the government. They're not like the major networks over here who get advertising money. The funds they receive are already part of a yearly budget.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 12:03:37 PM CST

    What do the glasses do?

    by sithmenace

    Why is it so important to have them on?Looks good though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 12:08:29 PM CST

    Hm... sentient, *networked* triffids

    by s0l

    Pandora's first strike against Earth... I guess Avatar 2 will be a Cameron's idea of a Reboot of "Day of the Triffids"...

    But can't wait to see this...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 12:10:01 PM CST

    SithMenace

    by s0l

    They go for the eyes....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 12:50:03 PM CST

    Nasty

    by sithmenace

    Is that what they were doing to the girl?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 1:16:57 PM CST

    BNP is left wing

    by jbs9200

    I simply cannot understand why any conservative would even be remotely associated with the BNP; it is a protectionist, bigoted party that has its roots firmly planted on the far left of the political spectrum. The BNP are, indeed, an entirely disagreeable party but they are a legitimately registered political party and therefore we should beat them at every given democratic opportunity. I do, however, think it is folly to not fully understand the justifications for not voting for a particular party. To admonish or castigate an organisation on false pretences is counter-productive.

    The consistent miss-labelling of extremist parties is very damaging to liberal democracy, as it creates false tensions and misaligns people with causes they do not understand fully. I’ve yet to meet a Tory who believes in clamping down on free-trade and the nationalisation of private companies. The BNP are both racist and fascist: all fascist parties have left wing tendencies as they predominantly believe in nationalisation, collectivism and forbid free expression, which makes fascism the very antipathy of right-of-centre politics.

    I would find it very difficult to authorise a coordinated campaign against the BNP if the terms of discourse and engagement were not properly defined: the BNP are a party of hate and have their roots in the left wing traditions of fascism.
    I can understand why those on the left don't wish to be branded in the same political mindset as the BNP. Now they know how those of us on the right feel. But the fact remains that BNP beliefs DO have more in common with Socialism than with Conservatism - centralised command control, trade tariffs, state owned businesses ... I could go on. I struggle to think of a single issue which joins the BNP and mainstream conservatism. The Nazis were called National Socialists for a reason. Fascism is invariably described as a creed of the right. It isn't. As with the BNP, fascism has far more in common with the left, at least in political theoretical terms.

    A brief skim through BNP manifesto literature brings to light proposals for the following: large increases in state pensions; more money for the NHS; improved worker protection; state ownership of key industries. Under Griffin, the modern-day far right has positioned itself to the left of Labour
    It is also interesting that most BNP electoral successes come in former Labour voting areas. It is the crumbling of the Labour vote in deprived areas that provides the manure for the BNP to thrive. Witness the rise of the National Front in the late 1970’s under a decaying Labour Government and we can see that those conditions are close to being replicated today.
    Above all, though, the BNP is used as an indirect weapon against the mainstream Right. You will have noticed that the party is almost never mentioned without the soubriquet “far Right”. The BNP doesn’t call itself Right-wing, of course. It favours nationalisation, higher taxes, protectionism and (though it keeps quiet about this) republicanism. It markets itself as “the Labour Party your parents voted for”. Its manifesto calls for “the selective exclusion of foreign-made goods from British markets and the reduction of foreign imports,” and promises to “restore our economy and land to British ownership” and “to give workers a stake in the success and prosperity of the enterprises whose profits their labour creates by encouraging worker shareholder and co-operative schemes”.

    As Hayek wrote in 1944 in his brilliant chapter on “the socialist roots of Nazism”, the dispute between fascists and socialists is a dispute between brothers. Labour and the BNP are, in a sense, competing for the same sort of voter: one who believes in the power of the state. The one kind of voter whom both fascists and socialists regard as beyond persuasion is the small-government Tory.


    The real purpose of banging on about the “far-Right BNP” is to damage, by association, the Conservatives. If hurting the Tories means giving the BNP enough free publicity to keep it alive, it’s a price some Lefties seem happy to pay.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 1:19:54 PM CST

    mulberry

    by jbs9200

    Yes, my original post was intentionally over-the-top.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 1:20:35 PM CST

    Looks crap

    by judge dredds fresh undies

    I loved the book as a kid, hope this is actually good but those clips did nothing for me. Looks like most current BBC output cheap, over-produced, under-written tat.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 3:19:33 PM CST

    Izzard ....

    by ginge_muppet

    Fantastic actor .... could watch him all day long.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 6:03:45 PM CST

    That opening look like Emmerich on a TV budget

    by skimn

    but not bad. Good looking cast too, but Priestly? Its like whats wrong with this picture? And I'm surprised Bill Nighy couldn't find a role.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 7:08:55 PM CST

    oh my

    by jon pertwee

    two new dr who's in a week and this to fill the gap between them. it must be christmas.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 7:33:49 PM CST

    White Mountains Trilogy

    by flippadippa

    We need this adapted next, John Christopher's classic series, STAT.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 7:36:46 PM CST

    BNP

    by monkeymanreturns

    Like all crooks, the BNP lie. They push leftish ideology because thats what they think the low classes want. But they are a Right wing party because the only policy they actually believe in is forced deportation of non-whites. Anything else they say are lies. Left or Right, they do not deserve a voice in mainstream politics. Why? Because they are racists who break the law. You break the law, you lose your rights as a citizen. End. Of. Story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 7:43:35 PM CST

    Almost looks like an episode of TORCHWOOD

    by spyguy

    Tell me that chick in the third clip didn't remind some of you of Gwen Cooper.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2009 8:22:56 PM CST

    As I recall, Flippadippa

    by judderman

    The Tripods Trilogy was (partially) adapted in the eighties, but it fell apart because of some weird teen/man erotic undertones. Oh, and SithMenace, triffids have a poisonous tongue-like sting that strikes the eyes and blinds victims before killing them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2009 1:16:53 AM CST

    all this talk of the bnp...

    by emeraldboy

    reminds me of someone...Decalan Ganley and leibertas. that guy creeped me out. and he was seent packing twice. once by the Eu and ireland and then again by the irish voters.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2009 1:59:47 AM CST

    Triple_J_72: "Giant ants. Cool, right? I'm joking of course.'

    by big dumb ape

    Triple_J, a remake of THEM! would be cool and totally rock, given how much could be done with modern SFX. The military versus giant fucking ants? Talk about a summer popcorn movie that would put asses in the seats.In fact, in case you didn't know, Warner Bros. has long had a remake of THEM! on the development books, but it keeps getting pushed back and falling apart for one reason or another. Last I recall, Joe Johnston (who just did Universal's updated WOLFMAN) was actually in negotiations to direct a remake.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2009 2:11:52 AM CST

    BBC budget?

    by penhapus

    Dr Who costs just shy of a million quid an episode - when they know they can flog it around the world, and on DVD, they've got the cash...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2009 3:13:30 PM CST

    What is the etymology of Triffid?

    by 'cholera's ghost

    Does it mean Three Fid?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2009 4:30:18 PM CST

    the man behind Ned Kelly--

    by emeraldboy

    with Heath Legder. bought the rites to the tripods some time ago. and had planned to make independent film of them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2009 9:32:56 PM CST

    Etymology of Triffid

    by geoduck42

    In the novel, it's just a catchy made-up word that some anonymous newspaper copywriter comes up with, the "tri-" based on their three ambulatory appendages. (Although it's pronounced "Trif-fid".) No idea what inspired Wyndham in real life.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2009 11:21:20 PM CST

    thanks geoduck

    by 'cholera's ghost

    interesting

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 25, 2009 12:34:16 AM CST

    awesome!

    by maniaq

    can't wait!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 25, 2009 8:47:39 AM CST

    The Official DVD & BD Site

    by stallic

    You can find all the latest clips, info and news on the official The Day of the Triffids website - www.dayofthetriffids.co.uk for the upcoming DVD release 1st Feb and BD out 22nd Feb. I'm huge fan of the original novel and indeed of Wyndham so we've also stocked the site full of links any Triffids fan should get a kick out of including the original TV series, movie, the radio adaptations and more.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 27, 2009 6:16:37 AM CST

    eddie Izzard is one of Finest stand up comedians..

    by emeraldboy

    of the past twenty years. if not the finest. as an actor not so much. check him out on youtube.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 27, 2009 2:55:48 PM CST

    Big Dumb Ape: agreed

    by growltiger

    I saw it as a youngster and it was a memorable experience. That said, I have to agree it did not age well at all. Although I am usually skittish over remakes, reboots, or what have you, I think this story deserves a remake.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 28, 2009 3:43:09 PM CST

    Watching it now

    by jazz_mavericks

    and wondering - if they knew how dangerous Triffids were, when they had them on these farms - why not frigging keer them on an island somewhere, and not on mainland frigging Britain????

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 28, 2009 6:04:54 PM CST

    just finished watching Pt 1 ... and it suu-uucked.

    by newc0253

    although I'm a British taxpayer and hence paying for this thing, i'm not predisposed to hate it straight off the bat.

    First of all, I still have fond memories of the 1981 BBC version, although i was a kid at the time and have no idea if or how well it has stood the test of time. It's also been decades since I read the book so i'm in no position to say how faithful it is.

    certainly some of the updating is obvious straight off the bat. the triffids are now cultivated by giant corporations to provide an alternative energy source that's saved the world from global warming. also, it's a giant solar flare that blinds everyone, not a meteor shower. broadly speaking, all the key characters from the original are in the new version, although the main nemesis seems to be hell-bent on power for its own sake rather than ambitions to settle a polygamous christian commune as per the original.

    for the most part, the 2009 version of Day of the Triffids plays out like a made-for-tv version of 28 Days Later (which itself owes a lot to earlier versions of DOTT), if you replace the fast scary zombies with slow lumbering plants. it's also fairly slick and well shot, and the cast is pretty high grade. the whole solar flare and ensuing blindness and mass hysteria is handled sufficiently well to make it engaging enough to begin with.

    what sucks? pretty much everything that follows. after a watchable opening, the whole thing devolves into a series of cliches and dumb decisions. for example: Dougray Scott's character goes to extraordinary lengths to save his colleague from being blinded by a triffid in the opening scenes, by giving up his own safety glasses and almost being blinded as a result. Later on, he returns to the triffid farm to find they've all escaped. Does he stock up on safety glasses? You'd have thought it would be step 1 in fighting monster plants that try to blind you, but apparently all that safety glasses thing was too much plot consistency. And so it goes.

    what makes the tired script worse is each scene is vested with all the dramatic force of an episode of Holby City. Dougray Scott and the hot Richardson do okay but only Eddie Izzard seems to be enjoying himself playing a slimeball.

    it's watchable for a while & only the prospect of Brian Cox showing in Part 2 might make me follow the thing through to its conclusion tomorrow night. But despite the strong cast and slick production, the whole thing feels like a made-for-SyFy affair. It's watchable, but only to the degree that you find your entertainment in laughing at stupidity.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 28, 2009 8:04:54 PM CST

    oh the irony

    by jon pertwee

    the radio personality emerges from moorgate tube station, home of the underground's worst crash in 1975. ponder this: if she was up in the millemium wheel, why didn't she emerge from the embankment station which is just yards from the wheel. moorgate is several blocks away and to get to it you need to get on at embankment and then transfer at euston square. silly bbc look at a tube map next time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 28, 2009 8:29:50 PM CST

    Had the very same thoughts, JP

    by forgot_old_username

    I work not too far from Moorgate Station and wondered exactly the same thing. Bit of cockup. Not nearly as big as the idea that a solar flare can blind THE ENTIRE PLANET AT THE SAME TIME. Do the scriptwriters not realise that the Earth is round?

    Anyhow, that said... I liked it. The effects were very pretty. Brandon from 90210 as Coker was a bit of a giggle, but all in all it held up and was a lot of fun. Even the Triffids weren't too cheesy. I mean, 10 foot killer walking orchids was never going to be easy to pull off, but they're kept at a distance and suitably scary. Like how they kept the triffid sound from the earlier TV incarnation.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback