Logo

Cool News

Hoffman May No Longer Make A FOCKing Appearance, But Streisand Will!!

Published at:  Nov 20, 2009 12:05:28 PM CST


Merrick here...


In MEET THE FOCKERS, the 2004 sequel to MEET THE PARENTS, we were introduced to Bernie and Rozalin Focker (Ben Stiller's parents). Now that a new FFOCKERS film is rolling around, there's been some question as to who'll return.

Dustin Hoffman was to reprise his "Bernie Focker" role in the new FOCKERS movie - albeit in cameo form. This may not be happening now. Barbara Streisand, who played Hoffman's wife/Stiller's mother in MEET THE FOCKERS will have a "prominent" part in the new film.

Sources tell EW.com that there has been strife between Hoffman and the studio over the size of the part, the scheduling of the days on set and other difficulties. Hoffman had tentatively agreed to appear in what was to be a very funny cameo at the end of the film. That seems to have now fallen apart, due to either salary issues or scheduling problems, or both.


...says EW HERE.

When first announced, the title of the third installment was LITTLE FOCKERS. Word is the studio may flench and change this. I hope they don't...I think the public is more stoic about such matters than it used to be, and LITTLE FOCKERS is a (vaguely) funny title. Go ahead, we can take it...




Merrick on Twitter













    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:08:46 PM CST

    NOT FIRST!

    by johnnyrandom

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:08:58 PM CST

    Oh good, the whimsy bitchy nose makes an appearance.

    by strongbadmonkey

    Who cares, the last one was crap and now we get to drag it out for one more crapfest!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:09:18 PM CST

    Fock Hoff

    by seppukudkurosawa

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:09:27 PM CST

    Have Hoffman's character die on a bus on his way to visit...

    by tonagan

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:16:00 PM CST

    May flench?

    by mrdexter

    That's not a typo - that's poor vocabulary.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:18:15 PM CST

    this reminds me of the "Look Who's Talking" movies...

    by mansuper

    The first film was called "Look Who's Talking", followed by "Look Who's talking too," and then the direct to video "Look Who's Talking Now." Each film was progressively worse than the last(although I never bothered seeing the third movie in the series). I can only imagine that the 4th film in the "Meet The Parents" series would be titled "Big Fockers" or maybe "Mother Focker" or how about "Look Who's Focking Now."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:22:59 PM CST

    Who Gives A Fock?!

    by extremecinema

    Gimme a break...this series of films was purile, sophomoric shit of the lowest order from the start!

    If this is what is considered comedy for this generation, then we are all totally FOCKED!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:25:00 PM CST

    Yay!

    by beelkay

    I love kooky Barbra (as opposed to romantic drama Barbra).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:27:15 PM CST

    Get DeNiro to stand in as Hoffman

    by yackbacker

    He's already on set, just put a goofy wig on him and nobody will know the difference.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:33:43 PM CST

    What a shame...

    by creaturecantina

    You'd think they could have gotten rid of Streisand and made this third one watchable.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:41:47 PM CST

    Meet the Fockers was an abomination

    by darthvedder81

    One of the worst "comedies" I've ever seen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:47:54 PM CST

    Where is HArry's NEW MOON review?

    by newmoon4545

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:48:40 PM CST

    who cares

    by supercowbell5thecowbellhasspoken

    meet the fockers was funny maybe the first time, but wasnt as memorable or clever as meet the parents.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:56:38 PM CST

    mansuper

    by bouncy x

    sadly the 3rd Look Who's Talking was indeed in theaters, scary i know.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:59:07 PM CST

    Saldly "Look whos talking now" was in theatres

    by vin_diggler

    Fockers 3 should go directly to DVD and then into the dollar bin and then into the trash. Or better yet, let's not waste time even making it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 12:59:30 PM CST

    I meant "sadly"

    by vin_diggler

  • Nov 20, 2009 1:01:09 PM CST

    You wanna know what happened? HE READ THE TITLE

    by ricarleite2

    "LITTLE FOCKERS. OH! OH! WHAT THE FUCK? I AINT DOING THIS SHIT!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 1:01:31 PM CST

    Shouldn't it be called: "Meet The Little Fockers?"

    by sulla

    Just sayin'.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 1:02:40 PM CST

    I didn't see the second one ...

    by manifestchaos

    ... and I've pretty much repressed all memory of the first one.But honestly, why would anyone run into budgetary or scheduling problems over Dustin Hoffman? The guy hasn't done anything important in years (decades?), so how could he possibly command an exorbitant rate, and how could he possibly have a busy schedule?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 1:10:12 PM CST

    The first one is...

    by sailor rip

    ...actually not bad at all. The second is a piece of shit. And this one, well, any movie where grown men run around like assholes dealing with babies and little children(which studio's think is "cute") always sucks. Always.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 1:10:22 PM CST

    fourth one should be called

    by ricarleite2

    SHEETHEAD CONT LICKING CORK-SUCKING MOTHER FOCKERS

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 1:12:53 PM CST

    Little Fockers will be an abortion

    by karl childers

    A play on words of darthvedder81.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 1:26:11 PM CST

    Why would they flinch on Little Fockers?

    by bass ackwards

    They already did Meet the Fockers, not much of a difference between the two.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 1:38:05 PM CST

    So even Hoffman realized Meet the fockers sucked?

    by jaysin420

    why even do it then?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 2:05:43 PM CST

    Should've Been Midler

    by jonas grumpy

    I would have preferred Bette Midler over Babs in the second movie. Or, at least, they should have gone back in time and used the hot Barbra from "What's Up, Doc?"

    I would have also preferred Sam Jackson over Martin Lawrence in "Wild Hogs." Not that the movie would have been any better, but it would have been ever-so-slightly more tolerable.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 2:08:47 PM CST

    This should be a great movie

    by medium_messiah

    The first two were hysterical. I can't wait.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 2:29:03 PM CST

    Hoffman will eventually appear

    by jettl93

    It's not that he thinks the movies suck, but that he isn't an indemand actor anymore and is demanding a huge salaryone of two things will happen, the script will be altered so his part is bigger and therfore a larger salary is justified, or hoffman will balk and agree to the cameo at the rate the studio has offered<P.either way The Hoff will appear in Little fockers

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 2:38:14 PM CST

    Oh my god!

    by tumtwat

    Fockers sounds like fuckers! Hilarity ensues.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 2:45:14 PM CST

    It still boggles my mind...

    by harrycalder

    that "...Fockers" outgrossed "...Parents" by a solid 200 million. Sucked so hard compared to the first one...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 3:24:51 PM CST

    Meet the Focken Kids

    by lecerclerouge

  • Nov 20, 2009 3:30:26 PM CST

    Barbra

    by citywoof

    It's Barbra, not Barbara.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 3:43:10 PM CST

    No Bernie?!?! Possible Title Change?!?!

    by dutchrudder

    What the fuck is going on here?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 3:47:05 PM CST

    Oh and Jett

    by dutchrudder

    Hoffman doesn't really need this flick, and the studio doesn't think they really need him. My guess is someone is gonna say "fuck it". No Bernie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 3:50:19 PM CST

    How about Go Fock Yourself?

    by requisitemonkey

  • Nov 20, 2009 3:50:48 PM CST

    as a title I mean

    by requisitemonkey

  • Nov 20, 2009 4:23:55 PM CST

    what happened to this site?

    by jack d. ripper

    It's like they go out of their way to push stories that are stale about franchises and films that their target audience certainly does not care about. Look at the front page: UNDERWORLD, MEET THE FOCKERS 3, PLANET 51, THE BLIND SIDE, NEW MOON, honestly, who gives a shit?! Sure, there's some PORT OF CALL NEW ORLEANS and AVATAR stuff and UP IN THE AIR which looks great but CLEARLY is being pimped by this site due to some sweetheart deal, but overall these movies do NOT cater to this audience. And it's not like children and Sandra Bullock fans and preteen girls are gonna start flocking here! WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED! WE ARE A FAR CRY FROM THAT AMAZING SUPERMAN SCRIPT REVIEW FROM A FEW YEARS AGO!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 4:51:39 PM CST

    JettL93..

    by soup74

    it always throws me off now when you say something that makes sense.. have you dropped your other 'character'?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 5:22:16 PM CST

    wow jett dropped the bad schtick

    by supercowbell5thecowbellhasspoken

    yes i spelled that wrong

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 5:37:21 PM CST

    Fucking Hell, thanks for this awesome news

    by l. ron bumquist

    I'm glad I keep coming back here...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 6:32:26 PM CST

    Replace him with Pacino

    by burnednotice_dude

    Should have been Pacino in the second one anyhow.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 20, 2009 10:26:25 PM CST

    stupid

    by macready452

  • Nov 21, 2009 3:49:40 AM CST

    Yeah, right...

    by dutchrudder

    ...Jett "dropped" it alright. If by "dropped" it, you mean "Got called a big fat phony" by the admins, then yeah, he dropped it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2009 4:40:05 AM CST

    Some alternative titles for the movie...

    by gabagabannana

    How about Child Fockers or Baby Fockers?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2009 5:33:09 AM CST

    Fuck the Fockers

    by harrylove

  • Nov 21, 2009 9:59:36 AM CST

    Focker?

    by jonas grumpy

    I hardly know 'er!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2009 10:55:34 AM CST

    GIVE HOFFMAN WHAT HE WANTS

    by bringingsexyback

    And Babs reprising her role is cool news indeedy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2009 12:35:11 PM CST

    Meet the Fockers

    by mattyboy122

    Is quite possibly the worst movie I've ever seen in theatres. And I saw Batman & Robin, Wild Wild West, Men in Black II, X-Men 3, etc on the big screen. Just a fucking terrible, terrible movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2009 5:14:08 PM CST

    Stefan Kuntz to cameo as a german uncle!

    by axl z

    Motherfocker..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 21, 2009 8:12:58 PM CST

    I Hate Any Movie ...

    by thusspakespymunk

    ... that celebrates the "wackiness" of filthy people. Let's not forget this is the character who is first introduced telling us he forgot to flush the toilet he just shit in and they're all looking at his shit as he laughs "Whoops, looks like I forgot my own rules!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2009 10:02:23 AM CST

    Meet The Fockers was horrible

    by liljuniorbrown

    I loved the first one. It was original and funny,but they went waaay overboard with the second one. Kind of like Ocean's 12 but much worse.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2009 11:05:55 AM CST

    My unyielding hatred

    by fungomcgurk


    I had my girlfriend drag me to see "Meet the Fockers." 15 minutes into it, I wanted to impale my eyes on spikes. The only redeeming joke of this huge cinematic fart was a toddler saying "asshole." Sheesh, that makes the pot-and-tits teen movies look like a Charles Laughton epic. Anyone who laughed at that bad-acid-trip sitcom should be sterilized. There's something wrong with anyone attached to that thing who wasn't just in it for the money and they should get a hefty case of boils on their privates for their part in it. Somebody blew a nuke's worth of smoke up someone's ass and it came back out as this movie, in chunks. I don't normally wanna overstate too hard, but casting Barbra Streisand as a sex therapist made me barf so hard, I could taste my toenails. RALF! URP! OOG!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2009 6:01:59 PM CST

    Fock the fuckers

    by starchildad

    Have the parents be newly divorced and put Pachino as Streisands new lover who is possibly a retired spy thats either against Pachino or a dueling rival from back in the day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 22, 2009 9:49:57 PM CST

    I despise comedies ...

    by thusspakespymunk

    .. that base the gags on farts, smelliness, piss, shit, butts, dirty people, dirty rooms, dirty clothes, deodorant, etc. It's just NASTY and isn't funny - E-V-E-R.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2009 1:30:13 PM CST

    Will the real Robert De Niro please stand up...

    by jeditemple

    And reclaim your balls? Please stop making these comedies and get back to some real acting. We want more "Heat" and less "Fokkers."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Nov 23, 2009 3:33:30 PM CST

    My mother is a hair stylist...

    by the_beard_of_chuck_norris

    ...and has been since the 60's.

    One time, in the 70's a customer sat in my mom's chair and said, "I want you to make me as beautiful as Barbra Streisand!"

    So my mother hit her in the nose with a hairbrush.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 11, 2010 9:26:34 PM CST

    ???

    by orcus

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback