Logo

Cool News

Albert Lanier steps into Gilliam's IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS!

Published at:  Oct 25, 2009 7:44:27 PM CDT

HIFF 29: YOU MAY SAY I'M A DREAMER
by Albert Lanier

When I was a child, I used to always hear from adults-whether teachers or other older authority figures I had no use for-that I should "use my imagination."

I always found that an interesting phrase and as a kid I would have all kinds of fantastical dreams and fantasies which I will not go into detail about here.

Its no wonder I ended up a writer-though, the wrong sort of writer, imagination wise. Try using your imagination when writing about a Mayor or Governor and you'll be wind up living in tent cities in Sacramento or Ontario, California given the nation's precarious economic status.

There's something about the imagination that withers and dies with adulthood. Life becomes a series of meetings and appointments not swordfights with villains and rescues of maidens in towers.

The world of imagination has always been a preoccupation for director Terry Gilliam though not in a simplistic childish sense-with the exception of his early film TIME BANDITS-but a richer, sophisticated adult driven world.

In THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS, Gilliam fuses the imagination with the craft of storytelling to produce a film about the wondrous vistas and ideas trapped in a gritty, grimy workaday reality.

IMAGINARIUM opens with a shot of a city block in London-where this story is set-and the scenes reveals a small team of horses at the front of a wooden contraption that should either cut up and burned or put in a museum. The camera tracks to two sleeping homeless men before cutting back to the contraption.

A panel comes down and in no time a portable theater-looking like something out of Commedia Del'Arte or the traveling theater in ROSENCRANTZ AND GUILDENSTERN ARE DEAD-emerges.

A man dressed like the ancient Greek mythical figure Mercury appears and does his spiel hoping to attract a crowd to this-the Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus.

The reality is that this ""imaginarium"" is a crude stage with painted trees and a "mirror" through which people can enter and is located right in front of nightclub named Medusa ( nice punny name there).

Onstage is the doctor himself- who looks more a Hindu holy man than any doctor I know-and his fetching daughter Valentina who has a wondrous bosom. I say that because a drunken club goer offers his admiration for her splendid cleavage (though not in those words) and chases her into the "mirror" or portal to the imaginarium to try to show her how much he "admires" her.

I wont say what happens to this bloke although its probably not a good idea to have a beer in this illusory world.

This traveling troupe soon sets off through the streets of London as their theater/vehicle is steered by the diminutive Percy, a man prone to pragmatism who is the only part of this "company" who can cut through the crap and tell it like it is.

While traveling over a bridge, they see the shadow of a man in the water below. It appears that he is hanging beneath the bridge. It turns out there is a person danging from a hangman's knot under the bridge.

We later find out that his name is Tony-though he claims at the time to suffer from Amnesia-and he is the former head of a children's charity.

Tony soon becomes part of this motley groups of performers trying to convince the good doctor that his changes should be implemented.

For one, taking the portable theater to upscale shopping centers and having rich and upper middle class women experience the imaginarium experience.

Valentina falls under his spell which infuriates Mercury-real name Anton-who has fallen in love with Valentina and is resentful of Tony's oily charm and smooth pseudo-sincerity.

However, the main pot thrust of the film is the escalating series of wagers that Parnassus has had with Mr.Nick aka the Devil over a number of years.

Parnassus is over 1,000 years old and he is tired of living on and on and on. He makes a wager with Mr Nick that he can get five souls to go through his imaginarium. If Parnassus wins, he gets mortality. If he loses, he must give Valentina over to Mr.Nick.

Readers may notice that I have not mentioned any of the fantastical CGI-created and shaped images in this film, the visions of the imaginarium.

I'm not going to either. I could ladle on rich adjective over creamy adverb in describing some of these sumptuous images but I feel doing so would be akin to revealing who the killer is in Agatha Christie's "The Murder of Roger Ackroyd."

It is best to watch IMAGINARIUM for yourself to experience this odd and wonderful visual palate as I did with a packed-to-the-rafters audience at the Hawaii International Film Festival on Friday, October 23.

IMAGINARIUM features some nice performances. Christopher Plummer is terrific as Parnassus, playing the part of this wondering dreamer and imagist with a KING LEAR like fragility and sense of weariness and regret.

The late Heath Ledger-probably the reason most people will see this movie-shines here in the part of Tony (supposedly named after British Prime Minister Tony Blair-no wonder I didn't like the character). Ledger plays Tony to a T-at least in scenes he filmed before his death.

Ledger's part is finished by Johnny Depp, Jude Law and Colin Farrell who play differing versions of Tony within the imaginarium. Of the trio, Farrell is given the best scenes and not only chews the scenery but swallows it whole.

Andrew Garfield does a nice turn here as Anton and wide eyed Lily Cole is charming as Valentina with scene stealing performances from Tom Waits as Mr. Nick and especially Verne Troyer who shines as Percy.

IMAGINARIUM was written by Gilliam and Charles McKeown, the team that co-wrote Gilliam's notorious features BRAZIL and-a personal favorite of mine-THE ADVENTURES OF BARON MUNCHHAUSEN.

IMAGINARIUM isn't in the same league as BRAZIL and MUNCHHAUSEN, ambitious films with stronger stories and highly potent imagery.Gilliam's newest film is-despite its visuals-a simpler tale a heart, more intent on wondering the streets of urban London in near-nomadic like existence than challenging entrenched powerful authority (BRAZIL) or choosing to hold on to dreams in a time of war and destruction (MUNCHHAUSEN).

Here, Parnassus holds on to the power of stories. My favorite scene in IMAGINARIUM comes when Parnassus and Mr.Nick first meet in an enormous Tibetan Buddhist type temple in some wintry locale.

What are you all doing, asks Mr. Nick. We are telling the same story over and over again, replies Parnassus. Why? Because it keeps the universe functioning.

I loved this idea. Yes, even a cynical, jaded film critic like me liked this concept.

So long as the story doesn't begin "There was an old woman from Nantucket..."




    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 7:48:28 PM CDT

    Can't wait!

    by rctowns

    Oh, yeah!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 7:50:08 PM CDT

    Gilliam's a genius...

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    I'm there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 7:58:22 PM CDT

    Gilliam Q&A in Sydney tonight....

    by dark antifyre

    ...after a showing of the film. Looking forward for both to be enlightening...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 8:01:15 PM CDT

    Tom Waits worth the ticket price alone....

    by 2for2true

    Word I'm getting from friends who saw the premiere in London say this is a terrific film. Any word when this opens stateside?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 8:06:21 PM CDT

    Can't wait. I'm not even reading this...apologies Mr....

    by flickapoo

    ...Lanier.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 8:38:52 PM CDT

    Farrell swallows it whole

    by meadowe

    Man that just made my day. Seriously I would've thought Johnny Depp and Jude Law would've done betterm but then again maybe imo they have, I'll see it Christmas and make up my own mind.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 8:40:24 PM CDT

    Ledger plays Tony to a T-at least in scenes he filmed before his

    by the funketeer

    Were there some scenes he filmed after his death?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 8:44:03 PM CDT

    the title reminds me of

    by meadowe

    The movie Troy McClure did in the Simpsons after he married Homer's in-law, I think it was called the fantabulous contraption of horatio huffnagel....? Anyway I sincerely hope this is good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 9:16:25 PM CDT

    HEATH rocks it...

    by maverick1

    The Academy is already talkin about Oscae nom for Health. http://sickpicks.blogspot.com/

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 9:18:34 PM CDT

    Wow Albert. Considering you were at pains to point out

    by white_vader

    how you're a legitimate writer, film critic and so on, you might consider that a real writer would know "fantastical" offers bugger-all over "fantastic" and more to the point is the redundant version, whether it's in the new dictionaries or not. Usually I wouldn't be such a nazi, but seeing as you were sorta pompous about inserting yourself and your credentials into the "review", you deserve to be pulled up.

    You might also want to proof-read your stuff if you're such a professional - "wondering the streets" indeed. Obviously there's no-one at AICN (and considering Harry gets paid, he's a professional in the true sense of the word, but not in the layman sense) that performs that function. They can't even tell the difference between singular and plural. But then, neither can your average newsreader or newspaper journo these days. I'm all for conversational writing, but that's not what you where getting at. And to Funketeer, right on!

    I'm sure if TBers actually read this they'll get all pissy as usual, but hey - in the world of TB whiners, I'm the least of the arseholes...

    Rant over.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 9:55:59 PM CDT

    Will this make as nuch as The Dark Knight?

    by lockesbrokenleg

    I doubt it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 10:06:25 PM CDT

    lockesbroken lug... nuch indeed

    by murdermostfowl

    We can only gope that rhis dilm nake as nuch as RSJ did.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 10:12:24 PM CDT

    See this movie high as fuck.

    by macready452

  • Oct 25, 2009 10:22:17 PM CDT

    DAMMIT I CAN'T SPELL!!

    by lockesbrokenleg

    And I even have a spell check.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 10:23:33 PM CDT

    That's all great but

    by kafka07

    when the hell do the rest of us get to see it??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 11:05:24 PM CDT

    ANOTHER REVIEW OF MINE HARRY DIDN'T USE...

    by shaneo632

    Sent him a review of this last week, but like my review of The Road, he didn't use it for some reason...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 11:18:23 PM CDT

    Saw yesterday in Brazil

    by _lizarkeo

    In the "Sao Paulo International Film Festival". YOU ALL MUST SEE IT, ALL OVER THE WORLD. For Terry, for Ledger, for Waits, for Plummer, for Cole, for Troyer, all great. Of course, everybody cheered when Depp showed his face, but both Farrell and Law were great too. But Harry was right in his review. The real scene-stealer is Andrew Garfield. He is doing next a movie with another rising star, Carey Mulligan (superb actress in An Education, another film I saw in the same festival). Great times for movie lovers indeed. Cheers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 11:38:14 PM CDT

    Plus

    by _lizarkeo

    Everybody will want to love Ledger in this movie (and he is truly great, he will be missed), but Garfield makes you sympathize, feel sorry, mad angry, smile and, finally, be really happy about his character. Great range indeed, dudes and dudettes. Cheers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 11:38:41 PM CDT

    white vader

    by harold-sherbort

    Where. We're.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2009 11:40:28 PM CDT

    Were.

    by harold-sherbort

  • Oct 26, 2009 12:12:19 AM CDT

    Such a memorable title

    by lockesbrokenleg

  • Oct 26, 2009 12:27:33 AM CDT

    best review on this site in a long time

    by billboefett

    passion, intelligence, wit, charm, nicely written. I didn't get to fuckin hear about what the reviewer ate for lunch, or how he's oogling such and such actress, or hear 15+ namedrops from the interviewer in every single interview these AICN guys do. Its like the interviewers have to prove something to who they're interviewing, every damn time. We're all sick of it you, know (Quint).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 3:19:14 AM CDT

    Film is a massive disappointment

    by zoothorn21

    I hate to say it, but...there's no humour, no heart, and the pace and plotting are just incoherent. I've rarely felt so unengaged with a film or the characters in it. I really wanted to love it too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 3:57:23 AM CDT

    err

    by roxyprime

    Look Plummer was great, Lily Cole was surprisingly good but will no-one dare mention the dodgy as hell accents that Heath was doing?? Anyone?? Half Mockney, half Aussie and a pinch of bad drama school. Everyone else in this film was fab, but remember Heath for Dark Knight....not this. That asides, still a very good film! Flawed but good!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 4:53:49 AM CDT

    This guy is no writer...

    by zargotron

    Fucking horrible...who thinks sentences are paragraphs?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 5:17:23 AM CDT

    Heath may have fluked it with Dark Knight

    by v'shael

    I was never impressed with him when I saw him in Knights Tale or Brokeback Mountain or whatever. He killed in Dark Knight though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 6:01:54 AM CDT

    Sorry to say, but Heath sucks in this film

    by wookie_weed

    He's tired, worn out, his performance is awkward, and he looks completely out of place. If you're a Heath fan, skip Imaginarium and treasure your memories of the Joker instead.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 6:32:31 AM CDT

    LOL zargotron

    by chakraborty

    Yeah, that was annoying. Gotta agree with zargo and white vader.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 6:42:12 AM CDT

    There's also a notable absence of commas...

    by chakraborty

    ...in the review...apart from a handful.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 7:20:55 AM CDT

    Why the love for MUNCHAUSEN?

    by burnhollywood

    When that came out, I remember thinking what an expensive, confused comedown that was after his career peak of BRAZIL...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 7:38:12 AM CDT

    white_vader beat me to it

    by bah

    It is => it's
    And can you write a sentence without a parenthetical?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 8:37:46 AM CDT

    The Seven Faces of Doctor Lao

    by yodalovesyou

    Now that was a good movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 10:15:36 AM CDT

    Funketeer brings the whipping to the "Professional writer".

    by conspiracy

    Best observation of the morning...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 10:18:09 AM CDT

    You are wrong, yodalovesyou...

    by manos

    Doctor Lao was a GREAT movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 12:08:21 PM CDT

    i hate it when

    by nerd_rage_retard_strength

    the "review" of a movie is just a long synopsis of the movie. lame.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 1:52:51 PM CDT

    WTF. This is a sentence?

    by sailor rip

    "IMAGINARIUM opens with a shot of a city block in London-where this story is set-and the scenes reveals a small team of horses at the front of a wooden contraption that should either cut up and burned or put in a museum."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 1:54:21 PM CDT

    Feral Colon

    by sailor rip

    Good one. Along with Toby's girly man painkiller induced giggle.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 2:18:55 PM CDT

    If it's Gilliam, the movie will make no sense

    by lockesbrokenleg

  • Oct 26, 2009 2:44:43 PM CDT

    Nothing is as good as Time Bandits!!!

    by picardsucks

    Best Gilliam film ever!!
    Greatest modern Fairy Tale ever!!
    I love Time Bandits!!!!
    David Warner still scares the shit out of me in his H.R. Gieger headpiece!!
    Connery as the guardian Angel hero through time
    Visual genius!!!

    A Perfect movie

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 3:55:50 PM CDT

    Imaginabonerium of Doc Bareassus

    by limpdicksherlock

    Rental. Home theater.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 4:16:28 PM CDT

    I thought the Imaginarium was an Olsen Twin's apartment

    by glory_fades_immaxfischer

  • Oct 26, 2009 4:25:13 PM CDT

    The 'reviewer' forgot fo give JettL93....

    by drmorbius

    his co-writing credit. It also looks like he had a hand in the costuming department.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2009 6:37:37 PM CDT

    I want to see this even more after...

    by jaka

    ...watching Monty Python's Almost The Truth all last week. This review, while it contains some interesting points and opinions, is written terribly and contains far too much of the usual AICN "you should like my review because I'm special" bs.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2009 3:32:54 AM CDT

    Pretty good review

    by asimovlives

    AICN should use this Albert Lanier guy more often. He really sounds like a real smart guy, instead of MrBeaks and Massawyrn's febbles atempts at intellectualism.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2009 4:53:49 AM CDT

    Wow Asimov

    by white_vader

    ... your deadpan is vicious!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2009 4:55:59 AM CDT

    Dang Sailor

    by white_vader

    Can't believe I forgot to put that one in!

    And add one more to the Doctor Lau love.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2009 4:57:54 AM CDT

    Lily Cole = fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap

    by zombieheathledger

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback