Cool News
Massawyrm enjoys the light, flffy fun of CIRQUE DU FREAK: THE VAMPIRE'S ASSISTANT!!
Hola all. Massawyrm here.
Here’s a review I’ve been trying to find a way to write for almost a month now. One of the great surprises of Fantastic Fest, CIRQUE DU FREAK: THE VAMPIRE’S ASSISTANT is one of those films that at a glance doesn’t seem to have much to offer. Sure, it has a great supporting cast. But post-Potter Young Adult fiction adaptations are notoriously shitty. And with even the cleverest among them feeling somewhat original, the idea of a teen vampire who joins the circus seems like a stretch too far to be worth your time.
But nothing could be further from the truth. In all actuality, THE VAMPIRE’S ASSISTANT is a charming, delightful film chock full of great actors that bring all the charisma they can muster to make something more akin to a Disney version of Todd Browning’s FREAKS than it is anything else. And I mean that in the best possible way. In fact the film has far less to do with vampirism than it is about a boy who finds himself different and amid a camp full of people even stranger than himself.
The film this most reminded me of was SKY HIGH. It seems like it shouldn’t work. It’s a little goofy and contrived, but as it unfolds it becomes fresher and fresher, until you find yourself watching something truly unexpected. It’s certainly not a perfect film, but it actually is a pretty good one, one that I’d definitely watch again and would get a little amped about a sequel.
As far as tween geared horror/book adaptations go, this is pretty by the numbers. It sets up a lot of things it hopes will pay off down the road (if this is a success), and spends an awful lot of time explaining the rules of this particular world. And yeah, it occasionally suffers from Columbus-Radcliffe syndrome, with the protagonist wandering around wide-eyed at the new, magical world he’s been brought into. But once people like Ken Watanabe and Patrick Fugit show up as awesome circus freaks and Willem Dafoe makes a handful of appearances (with what time he can spare from the billion and six other movies he has in theaters this year), you get won over by all the little flourishes and touches this film has to offer.
And if that weren’t enough, John C. Reilly gets the chance to bust out his acting chops to play a character who isn’t a total buffoon – and gets some really impressive results. Reilly is a really talented guy, but has spent so much time playing variations of his BOOGIE NIGHTS character that it is easy to forget how good he really is. Here he is a powerful vampire embroiled in the center of a philosophical war between animalistic, murderous vampires who feel that killing human prey is acceptable and his camp comprised of vampires who prefer to leave their victims alive to feed from another day. And as the mentor to our young hero, he really gets a chance to play around and have a good time without resorting to pratfalls and glassy-eyed expressions.
A cute, if somewhat intense film, I’d rate this on the level of something like MONSTER SQUAD in terms of fright level and general appropriateness for kids. More appropriate for Tweens than small children, this is a family geared film that will entertain your older kids while hitting the sweet spot for you as well. But it does deal with a number of monsters as well as the idea of vampires killing people, so take that as you will.
It’s not a film I think you need to go out of your way to see, but it’s solid, likable, endearing fluff. If your kids are asking to see this, definitely go with them and make it a family trip. You won’t regret checking it out. Good old fashioned fluffy fun, this comes RECOMMENDED.
Until next time friends, smoke ‘em if ya got ‘em.
Massawyrm
Got something for the Wyrm? Mail it here.
-
+ Expand All
-
He's way too puffy and doughy. He must be the only vampire who feeds exclusively on victims with diabetes.
-
This sucks then?
-
...apologies Cobra-Kai.
-
. . . to have aired on the Family Channel in 1989. 1989 being the year my family first got the Family Channel.
-
I sense a lot of backlash what with all the Twilight twats and that new show on TV, too. Probably get lost in the shuffle, regardless of its worth...
-
except, im starting to accepting Reilly in any serious role. I mean i know hes a great serious actor and all, but he's just too damn funny.
-
Trailer looked okay, so what the hell? And even Selma with way more facial hair than Frida K. has me pleased. Nice to hear this doesn't suck.
-
I've read several of the books, and they're quite fun and fairly dark. For those concerned about Selma with a beard, *spoiler*....if it's like the books, she doesn't have the beard all the time. She has the ability to grow a beard instantly, but then just shaves it off.
As for JCR as a vampire... in this world, vampires actually age, although it's qat 1/10 of a human. So it makes sense that he would be older. He's kind of how I pictured Mr. Crepsley when I read the books. -
That's exactly what this means, if the TV ads left any doubt.
-
Genuinely emotional and deep artistic merit of Where the Wild Things Are = bad review. Trashy tween entertainment = good review. Yeah, gotta say I won't be trusting Massa's reviews for a long long time.
-
SELMA is one of Marge Simpson's sisters.
-
The genre became too crowded with awful vampire shit that had the supernatural dressed like circus freaks! The vampire genre became nothing but a joke and it seems some is trying to bring all of that looney tunes back!Blade made us feared vamps again and made us appreciate their ass-kicking powers.
-
that body is to good to pass up. Plus the beard could tickle your balls..er...so I've heard.
-
Oct 22, 2009 7:34:33 PM CDT
A double feature of this & Paranormal Activity in my future
by soylentmean
like, tomorrow. I hope nobody goes to see Saw 6...
-
Avatar trailer at the beginning. I won't be there
-
theaters?
-
I was bored last night and decided to go to a midnight showing of Cirque with a friend. I was so glad that I did go. The movie was nothing like those "Twilight" soap opera movies that only have young untalented actors who only got the parts because they looked good naked. Cirque had real talented actors who did a great job bring their characters to life. John C Reilly was so great playing a serious character instead of his usual dumb characters. I liked the story so much that I am heading out to buy the book series that it is based on just in case they don't make a any sequels.
-
This was the most original vampire movie I've seen in a long time. Too bad it got burried by the shlock of Twilight. A really nice little film that probably won't see a sequel because you guys don't know gold when you see it! What a shame!
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- G.I. JOE: RETALIATION Delayed Nine Months...Thanks To A Force More Sinister Than Cobra!! -- 214 total posts 213 posts
- THE DARK KNIGHT RISES TV Spot Has New Footage And Dialogue! UPDATED To Add Second Spot! -- 160 total posts 160 posts
- Who Is The Voice Of Batman In WB's Animated Two Part THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS? -- 154 total posts 154 posts
- Cats Beware!! An ALF Movie May Soon Come Our Way... -- 148 total posts 147 posts
- UPDATED!!! A Six-Pack Of New Character Posters For THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Forecast A Lot Of Gotham Rain And Snow!! -- 269 total posts 80 posts
- Gary Oldman Joins The ROBOCOP Remake! -- 76 total posts 76 posts
- AICN COMICS REVIEWS: INCREDIBLE HULK! DANGER CLUB! CLiNT 2.1! JAMES BOND! BATMAN INC.! AND MORE!!! -- 67 total posts 67 posts
- Baz's THE GREAT GATSBY explodes with one helluva dazzling trailer! -- 187 total posts 63 posts
- The Behind the Scenes Pic of the Day… the horror… the horror… -- 49 total posts 49 posts
- Zach Galifianakis Is Ignatius J. Reilly? -- 84 total posts 49 posts