Cool News
New Trailer For Lars Von Trier's ANTICHRIST Is As Beautiful And Fucked Up As The Film!
Beaks here...
If you've not read a single thing about Lars von Trier's ANTICHRIST, just click here and watch the theatrical trailer. Amazing, right? Now kindly skip the next paragraph and avoid the talkbacks.
If, by chance, you've been keeping up on the controversy, here's my brief take: the overreaction to Lars Von Trier's ANTICHRIST at this year's Cannes Film Festival may have done the film a huge favor. Though I don't recommend seeking out third-act spoilers prior to seeing the movie, knowing where the film was headed allowed me to connect more palpably to the emotional turmoil suffered by the unnamed couple (Willem Dafoe and Charlotte Gainsbourg) in the wake of their son's accidental death (which, by the way, von Trier has shot like a pornographic perfume commercial). Granted, this didn't make the film any less bewildering, but it at least kept me from obsessing over the much-blabbed-about violence that occurs not-so-abruptly in the film's penultimate chapter (and, yes, von Trier is doing chapter breaks again). In a way, what happens felt like a natural escalation of the characters' grief-induced animosity. It's anything but a stunt.
Does von Trier know precisely what he's saying with ANTICHRIST? I haven't a fucking clue, but I can't wait to watch it again. This may not be one of the best films of 2009, but it's definitely one of the most indelible.
IFC Films begins rolling out ANTICHRIST on October 23rd. Do not miss it.
-
+ Expand All
-
Von Trier is hit and miss with me, but he is insane. That's always a plus. At least it will be interesting.
-
I got off work early and downed a couple shots of Gentleman Jack.
-
You may hate the hell out of this movie, but you need to see it.
-
Or is it some kind of depressing allegory?
-
I'm excited. The fact that these reviews have been polarizing shows me that people are having strong reactions. Either way, at least it provokes something, other than indifference.
-
We saw this film at the Cannes Film festival. And yes it is rather disturbing while being incredibly beautiful.
-
this is the best talkback ever. No one being a douche and dissing the movie based on a fucking trailer and talk of shooting Gentleman Jack. I cant wait for AntiChrist. It looks mighty fucked up and I have to see it when it's only playing for a week at the local art theatre.
-
I still don't get the Trading Places love though...
-
Sep 11, 2009 4:59:49 PM CDT
I wish arthouse filmmakers would be less like von Trier...
by derlanghaarige
...and more like Werner Herzog. And I'm not just talking about the movies, but also about their persona. Von Trier and his movies always remind me of the snobistic directors and their silly movies, that were used as characters and gags in millions of sitcoms.
-
He's a pretentious, self-involved, egomaniacal prick who is more than willing to criticize from afar without ever even visiting the United States.
-
I'm still debating with myself if I liked it or not. There were some beautifully shot scenes, the acting was excellent (and very brave, especially Charlotte Gainsbourgh), and yes, there were some very disturbing scenes. Yes, very vague, but I don't want to give anything away.
-
...over and out.
-
Are giving me a boner. That is all.
-
this movie looks interesting. I'm down.
-
is one of the most beautiful things I've ever seen projected onto a cinema screen. I'm still not sure what I think of the film as a whole (leaning towards "script's a load of theoretical bollocks but I like everything else about it"), but it's totally effective as a psychological horror that really gets into your skin - the visual and sound design really unnerve you, particularly if you're watching it in a good theatre with good sound. Plus, I could watch Willem Dafoe being rained on by acorns for hours.
-
tell me i need to know
-
this trailer was fucking tight. I cant wait. Love horror flicks.
-
It lost me when the animals started talking. There's not even an anti-christ in this. Total rip off (and I'm not talking about the clit). While I thought the nut shot was pretty cool (with happy ending), the "I'm going to out Misery Misery" bolt through the leg was freaking stupid. It's like the whole movie is "I've got this wacked out ideas for sick and crazy scenes, let's put a really boring moving around them and call it artsy". Here's the summary. Kid dies, mom get sad, weird stuff happens but nobody cares, mom gets crazy, Scooby Doo reveal that mommie thinks women had it coming and are instrumnets of the devil, more weird crap, somebody lives, the end. Also, the shot of the kid falling out of the window was overdone and something Uwe Boll might pull off on a good day. You don't NEED to see this, somebody just needs to make a 5-minute video of the interesting stuff and chuck the rest.
-
see, it's amazing how so many asshole staffers at aicn are assuming more and more that whatever they put down is gospel and that the readers have to agree with every word of it. no, beaks, it is NOT amazing. in fact, it looks pretty routine. by the way, von trier is one of the most over-rated arthouse guys out there. anyone remember "dogville"? didn't think so.
-
I remember "Dogville", but only because it was the most painful moviegoing experience of my entire life. The absolute most pretentious, self-indulgent piece of garbage that I've ever seen.
-
William Dafoe has ginger pubes
-
Same one I had with Breaking the waves. I think I like it more than I hate it 4 months later... You didn't like Dogville? So strange.
-
Plan on re-watching this month, but it's likely to turn up in my top twenty of the decade.
-
but I could sure do without seeing Dafoe's nakedness again. Watching his scarecrow face munch on Madonna's beef curtains in "Body of Evidence" was enough, and that was several years back.
-
Very well shot, the mixture of techniques was interesting, and at times quite beautiful. The plot, whilst ponderous, did intrigue me up to a point. That point being when it turned into a "arthouse" Eli Roth film (sure that's a glib comparison, but in my opinion justified).Lars von Trier created a dense, dark sense of foreboding, then fucked it up by using shock tactics (also the performances went to shit). I'm no prude, I enjoy "extreme" Cinema, in fact if he came out and admitted that he just wanted to make an exploitation film I'd be fine with that (if he has done so please correct me)."Antichrist" reminds me a little of "Irréversible", not in terms of story (though I'm sure some will view both as misogynistic), but in terms of public perception. Some adamantly defend it as art, some call it trash. Me? I'm in the middle, both films are technically well made, yet ultimately empty mindfucks.So yeah, worth watching, but no big deal. Certainly not a great film.
-
no surprise there
-
...it's not shot in a warehouse with tape on the floors to represent walls, doors and windows.
-
He's messing with us, right? What's he going to post next, that the Dark Backward is an underappreciated masterpiece?
-
...as someone who has liked a good bit of Von Trier's output over the years I have to say it was a stylistically interesting but ultimately empty exercise. It ended up seeming more like a metaphor for the director's attitudes toward others than a critique of anyone or anything else. Watching Dogville actually made me look at The Idiots in an entirely new and somewhat uncomfortable light.
-
I've been meaning to watch this film. I'm not a big fan of Von Trier though. Also did you guys hear about Argento's latest film? It was laughed at. Oh where does the talent go.
-
...well that's one of the questions with Von Trier, isn't it? Is he a misogynist or is he simply obsessed with misogynistic imagery as a tool to make thematic points?
-
I've kept up with Roger Ebert's take on it which sounds very intriguing ... kind of a mirror image of the world we know. Look forward to checking this out for myself in a few weeks. The link to his TIFF journal entry: http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/09/tiff_2_antichrist_redux.html
-
Another talent has passed. He was a real talent from the old school and contributed greatly.
-
couldn't agree with you more. of course, try telling that to "mr. art" beaks, who thinks it's top twenty of the decade material. some people are so pretentious and transparent. at this rate, von trier could film himself taking a shit and beaks would think it was "amazing". just sad.
-
R.I.P.
-
I still don't know how I feel about it. I am a supporter of art horror to the extream, BUT, there is a point when some art films become self indulgent directorial masturbation. Wait, I guess I do know how I feel about it.
-
I just do not get why people think that...And I am generally pretty quick to notice misogyny.
I could see where one could get the impression that he hates men, though.
-
He comes across as a pretentious douchebag (hell, he didn't even earn the "von," an indicator of noble lineage, he added that himself) but it's hard to say how much of that is a put-on. I think I got turned on to him, like most Americans, by his "Zentropa" which is one of his few flicks to get wide release here. Years later, in the dvd age, I went back and rented "Epidemic" (seriously fuxed up), "Medea" (classic & unusually restrained for him), and later saw Dancer in the Dark, Dogville and Manderlay. He still irritates the hell out of me but I prefer that to boring studio tripe so I still give him my moral support. BTW, my favorite remains the documentary "The Five Obstructions," where Trier more or less bullies his idol/mentor to re-make an early film several times, each time with a different artificial obstruction created by Trier. Trier really comes over as an asshole in this documentary and seems to treat his idol like shit up until the end when he truly reveals the respect he has for this man and acquiesces to his greatness ... a touching moment that makes you forgive Trier for a lot.
-
Not every word out of his mouth is serious. He strikes me as being a pretty humorous guy.
-
should consider checking out his horror/hospital series 'The Kingdom' and then STFU...
-
...check out the far superior Stephen King remake. Nothing says American quality like Andrew McCarthy. Riget is fabulous, one of the creepiest, most surreal, most effective horror shows ever made. It breaks my heart that it will never be finished.
-
The ambulance game. The graveyard of Doctors' mistakes. Stig's insane hatred of Denmark. Nah, there are way too many things. If anyone reading my words hasn't seen it...see it. And Salardo, as a lover of Riget you may also like the Japanese film Infection. And Salardo, just for you...Dansk Skalar!
-
...things are sad. When the adults cry things are sorrowful. What does it mean when the building cries?
-
...now that I've gotten my love for Riget out...people raise the claim because of the horrible way women are treated/portrayed in Von Trier's work. Victimization and passivity in the face of victimization. You do it in one film and it's the story. You do it in four (five depending on how you look at it) and it may be something more. I'm more of the mind that Von Trier just hates everyone and that women aren't excluded.
-
The Stephen King version had me cringe so hard my balls went up my throat.. TOTAL FUCKING DISASTER...
-
I'm going to SPOIL a huge SPOILING part of the, er...climax of this film. DON'T READ IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW. but for those of you with trepidation about some of the more gruesome aspects of this, well...here you are....Dafoe's character is unconscious, and Gainsburg, um..."affixes" him to a rock. she then proceeds to SMASH HIS TESTICLES, jerk him off so that he orgasms blood, and then, (because why not?) she cuts off her own clitoris with scissors.I'm not a squeamish person in general, and there were parts of this film that I found captivating, but if I could "unsee" it, I would in a heartbeat. I had a really hard time falling asleep that night.and no, things are not "implied", it's all right there on screen.for me, this was arthouse torture porn. what great moments it had were completely devalued by this "I gotta shock em and make em puke!" mentality that the film devolves into. truly a shame.
-
...I couldn't make it through the first part. Good to know that you were also dumb/hopeful enough to give it a chance.
-
"Ouch, me nuts have been smashed to pulp. I'm in sooo much pain oh somebody stop the pain, jeez the pai..ooh now I'm been jerked off, NICE!"
-
yeah, that's right, I talk to myself, what of it?
-
they were developing a video game sequel called 'Eden', where at the beginning of the game you are to answer questions concerning your greatest fears. The game is described according to Morten Iversen, the game director, as a 'nightmarish version of Myst'... Sounds interesting...
-
from Von Trier? Even if there isn't I can't wait to see it.
-
Sep 11, 2009 8:24:44 PM CDT
LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS AS I LOVE BREAKING THE WAVES....
by carlthormark1978
Von Trier is a bit of a wanker but I really liked Dogville and Manderlay.
-
No sir, I didn't like it.
-
But I never get the impression he's reveling in their suffering. He doesn't make it seem sexy or titillating, the way some filmmakers do. And I never get the feeling that he's mocking them.
Also, their passivity isn't knee-jerk. I think he gives a good sense of the reasoning behind the characters' reactions, to the extent that I'm not even sure I'd call it passivity, necessarily.
Awww, I love Lars. -
But Morten Iversen was also the creator of the 'Hitman' video games. So I expect no more than high quality shit...
-
...like I said, I think he hates everybody. And I don't think that's always a bad thing, for a writer or director. I mean Hitchcock didn't like us. Allen doesn't. Littler guys like Larry Cohen, Abel Ferrara...when you think about it most of the New York filmmakers.
-
Lars is a cool guy. Met him a couple of times and he is laid back and pretty funny.
Not at all what you'd imagine. -
To understand Lars "von" Trier and his films one has to realize that he was born Lars Trier and added the "von". He's a two-edged sword. He shows his contempt for (artistic) aristocracy, but in the end he wants to be just that. Lars Trier is super-conservative, his films are super-conservative, his message is… and everything purportedly "progressive" is only surficial. He's one of the biggest sham packages art has ever seen.
-
Without doubt the most self serving absurd wank of a film ever committed..
you must be a cretin Beaks.
It's laughably bad, even Von Trier himself apologizes for it. -
i really don't understand the AICN love for quicktime. doesn't look any better than other video players and only works about 20% of the time.
-
All over the people in front of him. That'd certainly put a damper on the viewing experience.
-
I mean, why the title then? Why not just call it Genital Mutilation: The Motion Picture?
-
But based on the spoiler descriptions I think I'll go to church and say a prayer for all involved in this movie instead.
-
That's crazy. Did you sit through all of the credits? Maybe Damien Thorn appeared at the very end and had a Ferris Beuller moment.
-
Sep 11, 2009 10:39:47 PM CDT
I can't believe Von Trier cut out the David Spade scene.
by pickledsausage
-
Sep 11, 2009 11:01:34 PM CDT
That's great he's a COOL GUY...so long as he stops making films
by quantize
forever preferably
-
A simulated clitoriadectomy? A husband wife murdering each other? I'm sure Gary Cooper and Cary Grant would have loved this movie. I hope Hollywood finds a soul and rejects this stupid piece of garbage. Lars Von Trier is quite obviously a mentally unstable and untalented lunatic. The fact that he's able to get funding for his crap is a commentary on the sad state of film art.
-
I agree with you. I'm not even religious, but no sane person would be involved in this type of crap.
-
Sep 11, 2009 11:31:19 PM CDT
REMEMBER THE PART WHERE SHE JACKS OFF THAT GUY TILL HE CUMS BLOO
by pleasewipemyass
FUCKING COOL BRO
-
judging from your name, you're not the brightest star in the sky, but it's nice to warn people about spoilers, and certainly not to put them in the subject line of your post.you know, some morons at least TRY not to be morons. can we get a little effort, kiddo?
-
It sounds like a cliche, but I thought this was a beautiful film, very personal. If you can ignore how arrogant Von Trier (obviously) is, then it's great. Here's a video interview with Willem Dafoe about it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQu8s1Uoz2k&feature=channel_page -
I think its probably in my top 10 films...BUT... can't recommend it to anyone with a straight face!
-
.. here is talking about Roger Corman finally getting an honorary Oscar. Faith in The Academy has been restored!
-
right...that tells me all i need to know.
-
is so against the Von Trier I have seen (only seen Dancer in the Dark and Breaking the Waves) it's very very slick with the latest mage trends in full force... but I do want to see it!
-
don't take his interviews seriously…
-
1. American Beauty
2. Citizen Kane
3. The Shining
4. Titanic
5. Dogville
6. ANTICHRIST
7. Mullholland Drive
8. Requiem for a Dream
9. The Matrix
10. Moulin Rouge
Waaaaaddaya think?
-
Credibility gone...
some worthy films there...just absolutely not for any sane top 10 -
Moulin Rouge...one of the worst films ever made..a wank of a bad coke dream, ditzy drivel for bimbos and lame brains..
Requiem for a Dream has aged poorly..i loved the Wrestler but Requiem comes across as very self important and try hard..
bimbos and lame brains..
Mullholland Drive...probably one of Lynch's weakest..
The Matrix? ya gotta be fucking kidding..
Titanic? effectively made melodrama..but ultimately extremely twee...also why anyone with a brain doesn't give Cameron a free kick on Avatar despite Aliens and Terminator
Dogville is moronic wank..the very worst performance art and heavy handed..
The others i wont quarrel, but yeh your taste is nothing to crow about.
-
only do a top 50! I do regret the matrix in that position. Officially replacing with Adaptation.
-
Like IRREVERSIBLE, this year's critical darling arthouse controversy. Because I have so much money, I can afford to see movies that make me feel rotten and weirded out.
-
And less like a demonic hostel. Glad I read the talkback spoilers, never ever watching that shit.
-
Sep 12, 2009 2:58:11 AM CDT
Fucking, Dicks Jerked off till they squirt blood, clits cut off
by jambi
-
Lars has given interviews in Denmark where he's actually stated that he 'understands hatred towards Americans and why some have sought to injure them as a result of their callous indifference". Blah blah blah. I agree the US doesn't always treat the world well but this son of a bitch refuses to even come here and instead remains critical of a culture and people he does NOT fully understand. I, for one, will never again give him a single hard earned dollar.
-
Nice imagery. Good performances. But that's about it. The film really had nothing to say. It was self-indulgent, intended only for those involved with the film, and those who worship the filmmakers.
-
I can't say I enjoyed it but I certainly still think about it, still remember virtually the whole film (and not just certain scenes), which is more than I can say for the majority of the movies I've seen onscreen this year. Lightweight it's not. It's an adult film, arthouse horror. Someone compared it to "Obsession" (which I hated), but I think it's actually a lot more accessable than that . I think "Antichrist" is worth seeing but it's really not all about genital mutilation, don't believe the sensationalists.
-
It's good that direrectors like Lars Von Trier exists anmd make movies. They shake up the morass that todfay's cinema is settted on. It's always good to have a Lars Von Trier to contrast to the hackery of the Michael Bays and the Jar Jar Abrams.It's people like Lars Von Trier that really advance cinema. They are the experimentalists which bring new ways of making movies which the hacks then take from them 10 to 15 years later. The Michael Bays and the Jar Jar Abrams now might think they are being very new and modern shooting their shit movies with hand-held cameras, thing is, people like Lars Von Tier already were doing that, exploring the dramatic possibilities and blending the bounders of documentary and classic filmmaking ten to fifteen years before.You guys might hate him, might hate his movies, but it's filmmakers like Lars Von Tier who keep cinema alive.
-
Saw the film last night and don't regret seeing it. It's shot beautifully, the psychologie and horror have a strange fascination, but it's also kinda boring at times. During the first half there were phases in which I was thinking: "How many more minutes of this self indulgent, boring, pretentious, artsy fartsy director masturbation piece do I still have to sit through?" As far as art goes, is this film pretentious or the real deal? I honestly don't know. In retrospect I feel I have seen good movie. Though I don't need to see it again anytime soon.
As for von Trier's personality, anyone who comes up with the idea of making a musical with Björk, whom I absolutely adore, can't be such a bad person. -
The movie really is shocking but its done in such a civilised and arty way. It is a bit self indulgient and wanky/too arty for my tastes, but worth watching... I'd say watch it once to see what the drama is about and if you want to have some fun maybe bring someone along who knows nothing about the film.
-
Using that utterly retarded logic you could easily argue Rob Zombie and Uwe Bolle are genius directors...really thats the most fucked up fucktard argument you could put forward. Shit films do not advance cinema, theyre just fucking SHIT. PLEASE, try using some intelligence.
-
of COURSE Asimov Lives likes Von Trier, because like him you are a self important fuckstick with ZERO idea about effective drama because you're so busy BEING CLEVER. I didnt need any more confirmation you're an A CLASS JERK, but hell that sure puts the nail in your coffin Asimov
-
Certainly disturbing, but scary, thoughtful, and high quality. Never boring. Very creative. Flapping ball sack in black and white. Extremely misogynistic, though, but at least its point is made interestingly even if it offends. I think his best since Zentropa. Great horror borrowing from great horror classics. All IMO, of course.
-
Look into it, will you?
-
It's "extremely misogynistic"? Doesn't surprise me. Most of Lars Trier's work has been misogynistic. In this case it's even his primary agenda. Just look at the film's title on the poster. The last "t" in "Antichrist" is written as the sign for the female sex (Venus sign). So according to the poster, woman is the Antichrist.
-
I like that he kept genital mutilation out of Star Trek. Thanks JJ.
-
Thank YOU!!!!!
-
But I don't think they're the Anti-Christ! That's just plain M to the Iso.
-
I'm not religious either, but Jesus!!!
-
... Von Treirs does a gorenography flick and suddenly it's art. Load of bollocks.
-
Sep 12, 2009 9:27:38 AM CDT
Any moment now Chrisssm will start posting; "Obama is the Anti-C
by stalkeye
...wait for it.
-
If you weren't such an emotional little girl obsessed with the dumbest stupidiest blockbuster bullshit regurgitated by Holywood, i could even bother to make a reply on why you are so completly off the mark, as Michael Bay was when he did Pearl Harbor, and that's a lot, baby. But i don't think you are worth the effort. not until you buy yourself a pair of cojones and start act like a man.
-
... then how the hell there's still actresses working for him? One would think that if the gyuy is such the hardcore mysoginist that most people paint him to be, then how can you explain actresses working for him, some of them pretty well established actress with no shortage of film work offered them. How the fuck you can explain that?I think the accusations of Lars Von Tier's mysoginy is one of those bullshit stuff that gets repeated enough time, like saying Jar Jar Abrams is a good director, the lame brained ones start to belive it's true without questioning it. Just because it's repeated doesn't mean it's true. Fuck's sake, get a grip!
-
Sep 12, 2009 9:48:44 AM CDT
BringingSexyBack sometimes your atempts at irony almost work
by asimovlives
-
I don't know if he is mmysoginistic or not, but the film's message is definitely misogynistic. It's not hidden very well or seem to be open to interpretation. It's the theme and lesson. He could just be exploring characters, presenting misogyny, commenting on it, exposing it, or celebrating it. I have no idea. However, Bjork and Nicole Kidman worked with him and didn't care for him, and said while a genius he is misogynistic and is abusive to the women and not the men (perhaps since they are the lead characters?) or at least he treats actresses that way to get a performance out of them as victims. I guess you'd have to ask von Trier himself but he's also wacky so I doubt he knows, and if he does, he likes to play with people. In any event it is nevertheless a great film, his best since Zentropa, better than that, so his best I think. Acted, paced, emotional, and scary, all done absolutely brilliantly. Like his film or its messages or not, it's hard to deny he is a very talented filmmaker.
-
You and all your tea-bagging friends can take your Obama hate and GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE! We won...get used to it. You and your little regional party of southern white men can go form your own country. You might as well because your party only gets smaller by the day with all the hate and fear your idiots throw around. Start your own nation...call it Jesusland and elect that inbred dolt Joe Wilson your president. Not a single one of you racist fools will be missed.
-
Also I think actresses would work for him even if they think he is misogynistic because they know he is capable of brilliance, especially when they see he can bring out Oscar-worthy performances from actresses and actors.
-
No one gives a shit. However, if you can manage to get as GOOD as followup to the Abrams Trek as the first entry was, we'll alll be there--even Captain Ass-Tastic here from Oporto.
-
Shaduppa yo mouf.
-
Born from atheist progressive parents, he turned fundie catholic and cannot shut up about the wonders of having faith in things that do not exist. Talk about degenerating from your parents. Still a pretty good and talented filmmaker.
-
I saw it at TIFF yesterday. Solid film. Apparently they had to take out some scenes of his giant shlong as it would have been too distracting for the audience. No joke.
Good film, but strange and a little perverse. Certainly not for everyone. -
See the screener and then buy the DVD or BR when available. The big schlong is the greatest part of the movie! SEXY! ;) Seriously, for each ding dong shot, including one with ball-flapping penetration, was done by porn actor, prosthesis, CGI, or a mix of all.
-
I also read that von Trier found out not long agom from his dying mother that his Jewish father was in fact not his real father and his real father was an artist and happened to be Christian and she wanted her son to be born with artistic genius. I think it's on Wikipedia. Also apparently his real father and he hated each other and after a few visits his bio-dad threatened to press charges or sue. True story! no wonder he is nuts and also suffers bouts of extreme depression.
-
Only surpassed by your zenophobic stupidity. And your references to Oporto make you even more stupid and retard. but for you to know why, you would need to not be something you are: a stupid uncultured ignorant fool. Your Oporto references makes you look even more stupid then you are, considering how nothign you know about me, Portugal, my brithplace and Oporto. Realy, you are one dumb ignorant! Amazing!And your tastes in movies sucks ass! Go suck Jar Jar Abrams's dick.
-
Maybe Lars Von Tier should make a auto-biographical movie. All that weirdness in his live cannot go unexplored. It could even make for great comedy. Jesus, the lives of some people!
-
Porn actors performed the insertion scene at the beginning, and the scene where she jacks him off. You'll notice the camera was always very close when it was showing an erect dong.
-
That would be a cool film, no doubt. A docu. would be hard--I'd be afraid to be in the room alone with them guy! not really, but it would be tough. I think auto-bio would be really cool.
-
there is also a noticeable cut/edit when she grabs his wiener
-
His fundamentalist catholicism is enough to make me happy i don't even live in the same country he does, and i live in a catholic country. The man is still a brillant filmmaker, though.
-
Are you telling us that Dafoe cannot get it up anymore?, I don't know, man, Dafoe has done so much for the art all his career, getting an erection with such a hot woman like a naked Charlotte Gainsbourg at his side would hardly be his most difficult thing to achieve in his career.
-
Sep 12, 2009 2:50:13 PM CDT
Antichrist: The Biography of Jar Jar Abrams, writen by Gene Rodd
by asimovlives
-
Writen by Gene Roddenberry
-
Um, no. But for whatever reasons, the lead actors didn't perform the actual insertion or ejaculation. I doubt that's out of the ordinary for a major movie production.
-
Its not funny. It wasnt funny the first time. God knows it isnt funny the 523rd. It hasnt caught on, its not the new catch phrase, no one is going to re-debate you on Star Trek no matter how hard you keep throwing out the bait, its just something you keep tediously bringing up regardless of context or subject. I mean, a Von Trier talkback and your talking about Abrams? To what possible end? He's just a guy, he does some good stuff, some bad stuff, some mediocre stuff. He's really your choice for this epitome of, in your mind, hideous filmmaking? Really? Not Sommers? Not Boll? Not Rob Zombie? Not those Meet The Spartans jag-offs? Not whatever fucking hack directed The Final Destination? Yep, you nailed it on the head: its not Meet The Spartans thats the problem, its the director of MI:III and Star Trek, he is the herald of universal cinematic apocalypse. Just give it the fuck up already so I can go into a talkback on say, Survivor or something, and not see "You know who should be voted off the island?? Jar Jar Abrams!! HACK!!!"
-
I think you haven't seen enough films.
-
Lay down your crusade against Abrams already. WE GET IT, you think he's shit. And PLEASE, whether English isn't your primary language or not: Proof read, edit, and spell check your posts! Seriously dude, I skip past "Asimov Lives!" posts about 70% of the time just because they are so poorly written annoying to read. If you want to be taken seriously you are going about this posting business in a completely antithetical manner. On the other hand, if you wish to be regarded as a rabid, slaverering, semi literate adolescent, you are dead fucking on your game. Sheesh dude, you actually make some salient points from time to time, but your delivery 'method' totally undermines your effectiveness.
-
Mea culpa for comitting so many typos in a writing style chastisement post. *hangs head in shame*
-
{;-0
-
... or posts comments on AICN understand the difference between "then" and "than"?
-
I seriously doubt that. *spoilers* Infact I interpret AC as a loveletter to women, based on the fact that the universe in AC is an evil 'bizarro world' where normal benign things are threatening and wants to kill you (even acorns are fucking scary). Lars shows us how absolutely horrible the world would be if women where infact fundamentally evil.
His other movies also displays a profound respect for women even if they are treated poorly. They are way stronger characters than the men.. -
And filmed it many tines. He talked in the press screening afterwards how huge he was. They cut it out because of how distracting it was. Dana Delaney once made a joke about the size of his penis too.
-
Add 'ignorant fuck' to your 'pretentious twat' profile Asimov. You know nothing about MY TASTE, except that its fine enough to exclude total wankers like Von Trier and tossers like Baz Lurhmann...and we know YOU DONT LIKE JJ AND STAR TREK...oh we KNOW, OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER.
Like i can be bothered to run a list of my favorite european films for a douchbag like you. My balls are gargantuan you micro penis bloatbag. -
Try reverse psychology.
-
http://tinyurl.com/oboueg
-
01/ then is for time projection
Example: she smashed her testicles then jerked him off
02/ than is a comparative
Example: I'd rather smell a fat man's fart than watch this movie -
"Jar Jar Abrams Star Dreck are th woortes peace of shitti evver what foisteed world on th" woorlds. (yuve concinced mee Asimoov sow mmutch infarct thet I has adopted yoor rightingle stighls. luv ur inpoot on thees boreds dud. Kiep faughting the goot fart Asimovs. We hafs to kip th wourld saef frum Jar jars ie meelting abmnimatiuns moavis. Awl yews haterrses just bieter layt of Asimofs lievs he is if fukking tho grittest &@CN posturd evver what ritted a poast he hast vaast cinnymays noleoge and kan scool alls yus fukkers"...
-
Can't, and don't want to imagine what it feels like to lose a child, but the way von Ttrier explores this, fear and sex is incredible.
My only complaint, which has been mentioned already is some of the shock scenes, which do in my opinion distract a little too much from the themes above being explored above.
Spoilers
We didn't need to see him been masturbating and bleeding blood, to understand that she wanted to de-sex him. Similarly we didn't actually need to see her clitoris being cut off to know she wanted to de-sex herself. -
That may be the most fucked up, illiterate FAKE bullshit I've ever read in my life. Lol
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cmMpZekjD8&NR=1
Oh she needs to be spanked!!!! -
I thought I had a monopoly on the "Bastard" moniker. Maybe this is like Jason Bourne being created to draw out Carlos the Jackal and end him. Oh shit, I just came out into the open! NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
-
If you'd like to make a talkback, please log off and die again.
-
Simply a film that drags on and on if you hate it and then somthing you want to soak up every nuance if you like it.
I did not like it but i get why you would, personally i see films like these as a matter of style over substance. -
Graphic shower scene...so effin what? I needed something more contemporary as this movie comes off a bit too artsy fartsy.I wanna see a real AnitChrist related movie, fuck you very much.
-
"He's a pretentious, self-involved, egomaniacal prick who is more than willing to criticize from afar without ever even visiting the United States." - says Scorchy.
Wow, so all film makers need to visit the US now? GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK! -
But I was in the US over teh weekend and it's no ogner playing. I feel lucky though. Reading abotu some of the squemish scenes, I wouldn't want to have seen that... The other general imagery in the film looks pretty awesome though. Someone should just make me a haunting music video of those scenes or cut those scenes together and leave out all the cock and clit and other fucked up violent parts and I'd watch it just for the style. It's a shame though. The last good thing I saw that blended themes of eros and thanatos that was all fucked up was in a game called Silent Hill 2. This movie looked like it's could've been a great Silent Hill kind of flick... too bad... I'll pass. Maybe someone will throw the other good scenes up on youtube when this is out.
-
fpJMxyk IPtevPC
-
nSDwYbt VlqeoL
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 383 total posts 380 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 111 total posts 111 posts
- WTF HOLLYWOOD: SOLARBABIES -- 75 total posts 73 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 71 total posts 68 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 77 total posts 55 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 54 total posts 48 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 165 total posts 41 posts
- Herc’s Seen Tonight’s Return Of THE WALKING DEAD!! Discuss Also DOWNTON ABBEY, FEAR FACTOR, PAN AM, ONCE, SIMPSONS, DYNAMITE, LUCK, SHAMELESS, BAIT CAR, THE GRAMMYS And More!! Sunday Is Sweeps Day 11!! -- 41 total posts 41 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 500 total posts 35 posts
- Avid Comic Reader Hercules Does Battle With Tedium During Kevin Smith’s COMIC BOOK MEN! -- 28 total posts 28 posts