Logo

Cool News

Peter Berg Discusses A HANCOCK Sequel!!

Published at:  Aug 19, 2009 11:08:22 AM CDT

SPOILER ALERT !!


Merrick here...


Peter Berg talked to Sci Fi Wire about ideas being kicked around for a sequel to HANCOCK. We first learned of a possible sequel a while back, although everyone involved was quick to indicate it wasn't exactly on the fast track & was being seen as more of a long term possibility.

To my knowledge, this is the first time an actual direction for the film has been discussed publicly.

At the end of last year's Hancock, it was revealed that Will Smith's superpowered character was actually an immortal god who became vulnerable only when in the presence of his goddess companion (Charlize Theron). Berg confirmed that a sequel would elaborate on the film's mythology.

"There might be another god out there," Berg said in an exclusive interview last month in Pasadena, Calif. "Might be another one."
[EDIT]
Berg also confirmed that the subplot of Jason Bateman's publicist character should pick up where it left off in Hancock, where he's starting his charity campaign.


..says Berg HERE.

As Sci Fi Wire points out, if two "gods" getting together caused such a ruckus in the first film - one can only image the madness caused by injecting a third deity(ish) being into the mix.

Personally, I'd prefer to see a HANCOCK sequel that's not so...easy. To me, HANCOCK feels like the ending of a bigger story. I'd be much more interested in seeing what came before HANCOCK - Smith & Theron's horribly dysfunctional relationship as they come up through time, plagued by persecution and misunderstanding, inexorably drawn together but also careening towards their inevitable (and necessary?) separation. All of this is implied by the first film, and could make a pretty potent prequel I think.











    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:53:29 AM CDT

    FIRST

    by dr sauch

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:53:58 AM CDT

    Pass

    by unnecessary_expletive

    I only just saw Hancock recently after giving it a pass at the cinema. It looked like it might be a good superhero flick but I'd read about the whole 'dysfunctional gods' plot line so avoided it until I could get it dirt cheap. I was pretty unimpressed. Anyone else think the revelation that Theron's character was a goddess should have been handled in any way other than out of the blue?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:54:52 AM CDT

    And now, after my epic win, an actual post.

    by dr sauch

    This is one of the few times that I really want to see a prequel. I usually think that they're pointless, but here I totally agree with Merrick, that felt like the end of a huge story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:55:00 AM CDT

    I just want to see a prequel

    by series7

    A two hour movie of just those You Tube clips of him fucking up. Much better then the actual movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:55:04 AM CDT

    BORING. WILL NOT SEE IT. HANCOCK WAS DUMB.

    by gruemanlives

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:55:37 AM CDT

    I should also say that I really liked Hancock.

    by dr sauch

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:56:18 AM CDT

    No thanks

    by kolchak

    Hancock had no clue what it wanted to be. It was a mess.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:56:40 AM CDT

    I used to think Peter Berg

    by series7

    Was going to make great things. Sure Handcock made tons of money, but leave it alone. Move on. Will Smith movies are a hole.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:56:59 AM CDT

    ur kidding right??

    by mynemaborat

    hancock had the stupidest story ever

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:57:08 AM CDT

    NO. GOD NO.

    by iwasredempted

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:57:32 AM CDT

    "OH HELL NAW!!!!"

    by gruemanlives

    HELP YOUR MOM AND DAD BY GETTING A JOB SO YOU CAN HELP PAY FOR SCHOOL SUPPLIES, WAHOO!!! SAY WHAT' WHA'??? TAKE OFF YOUR SHOES BEFORE ENTERING THE HOUSE, SOMEONE JUST CLEANED THIS FLOOR, WAHOO!!! SAY WHAT' WHA'???

    Will Smith and his cool clean rap music.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:58:09 AM CDT

    That's an excellent piece of music; thanks. :)

    by pennsydeux

    A prequel may be better; where could they go from there?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:59:13 AM CDT

    I really liked Hancock

    by marxeffect

    Im not sure if it was because I heard a lot of bad things and my expectations were low, but I thought it was really good. It would have easily sneaked into my top 15 from last year... maybe even top 10?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:59:21 AM CDT

    shoot, I waited too long to watch it and now it's spoiled.

    by durhay

    my own damn fault, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:00:33 AM CDT

    Jason Bateman Vs. Ken Jeong in

    by series7

    Who can appear in more movies in one year! Bateman can be funny, but at least Ken seems to have some sort of range. Also did I miss something in the Hangover? Was Ken the break out star of that movie? Because since that movie he is in every fucking comedy coming out. And if you look at the All About Steve poster, it looks like they photo shoped him in it last minute to bank on his fame.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:01:58 AM CDT

    Hancock was good

    by mr. zeddemore

    Look - I GET that people wanted to see a whole film of a fucked up superhero. But there's no arc there. Mainstream, well-written cinema needs an arc for the lead. Now a comic-book with someone as a fucked up superhero? That'd rule.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:02:14 AM CDT

    HANCOCK should have been a cable show or something...

    by flickapoo

    ...I really liked it, but it felt like the good parts version of a much longer story. You could have had a couple seasons just unraveling the mystery of who Hancock is. The Theron character's transformation from perfect mom and wife to angry badass was far too hasty...again, a couple season's worth of fun to be had there. And Bateman's character gets over his wife's back story too fast as well...I could buy it, but it would take him a few seasons to come around. In short, I really liked the dark turn, but all of the story lines needed to unfold over weeks and months...not minutes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:02:25 AM CDT

    Is Berg still directing DUNE?

    by tenenbaum

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:07:41 AM CDT

    Sequel name = Bangkok starring Bobby Lee from Mad TV

    by paulyd30

    now that would be a good movie unlike the Hancock peice of garbage

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:07:57 AM CDT

    Hancock was the least interesting thing about Hancock

    by the pusher

    I'd honestly rather see a sequel about Jason Bateman's character. Without him, that first movie was dead in the water.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:08:03 AM CDT

    Zedd

    by series7

    Handcock was not good. Come on you know better then that. It was fucking garbage. It's easily one of the worst movies I've ever seen. First off Will Smith just does not work as that character, everything is so obvious. And the last 2/3rds of the film just don't work. Had they just made some villian, and have him be some sort of Superman it may have worked.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:08:25 AM CDT

    Hancock should have stuck to the book.

    by donkey_lasher

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:08:25 AM CDT

    I liked the first Hancock

    by mazzer

    and thought it got more flack than it deserved. But a sequel? The dumbest, least imaginative idea is always to just multiply the elements from the first movie -- 3 villians instead of 1 in Batman, ditto in Superman... oh, and let's just add more gods in Hancock 2.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:09:53 AM CDT

    Hancock was HORRIBLE.

    by chezking

    Just a bad, dumb movie.
    Please don't make another one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:11:26 AM CDT

    I know better than that?

    by mr. zeddemore

    Dude, you know me. Of course I don't. I dug the flick. Not saying it's awards-worthy, but it was entertaining. And I liked where they took it. I will agree on the villain front, and it wasn't as good as Unbreakable.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:11:45 AM CDT

    A little late...

    by hairy nutsack

    My problem with the first one was that there was no real villian, or a real conflict for that matter. It's mostly Hancock flying from point A-B-C-D-etc. fucking up everything as he goes.
    This story synopsis sounds like what I was expecting from the first movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:12:16 AM CDT

    3rd God BHO, Hancock time travels to stop him.

    by evilwizardglick

    Hancock will travel back in time to discover the original Kenyan birth certificate. Thus derailing the image BHO's handlers have created.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:12:58 AM CDT

    Unbreakable 2: Dunn vs. Hancock!

    by vic twenty

    Stay away from the water!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:13:39 AM CDT

    I know better than that?

    by mr. zeddemore

    Dude, you know me. Of course I don't. I dug the flick. Not saying it's awards-worthy, but it was entertaining. And I liked where they took it. I will agree on the villain front, and it wasn't as good as Unbreakable.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:16:24 AM CDT

    Festering twat of a site.

    by mr. zeddemore

    FUCKING SHENANIGANS

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:20:35 AM CDT

    New God keeps....

    by niccageshairpiece

    Smith and Theron from hooking up and call it CockBlock,

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:23:41 AM CDT

    I enjoyed the movie

    by datoman413

    And I was ready to hate it once the details started to flow out, but I enjoyed it for what it was. By the way, I also thought the score was one of the best I heard for a "superhero" movie in a long time. Thanks for posting the link as a reminder.Now, having said all that, of course there is going to be a sequel, and of course there's going to be another immortal in it. The question is will it be another disenfrancised hero or a villian with amnesia, but whatever they do they need to think that through. Hey, Inspector Gadget probably looked good on paper too before they greenlighted it... okay, maybe not.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:25:16 AM CDT

    FUCK IT!

    by super rabbi

    Peter Berg should not waste his time with this shite. He's a good director, direct something else!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:28:05 AM CDT

    Wait

    by syn_flood

    Did AICN just link to an illegally uploaded copy of a track from John Powell's score?

    I thought this site didn't condone piracy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:31:11 AM CDT

    God no

    by lex romero

    That "twist" about an hour into the film was fucking terrible, took the story in a completely weird and terrible direction. As if they couldn't be bothered to continue on the first hours ok plot.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:40:00 AM CDT

    Hancock sucked

    by the game master

    There was a reason this script sat on the shelf for ten years--it sucked. It was only put into production because of the writer's strike (i.e. the studio needed a script they already owned). Consider this: If Hancock's counterpart hated him so much and wanted to get away from him, why live in the same damn city? Stupid, lazy writing. Not to mention the "coincidence" of his publicist making them meet up again. Just lazy, lazy writing. The concept was good, but the movie was poorly executed. This one needed a few rewrites. And a sequel, at this point, is only going to go from bad to worse. Will Smith himself said Hancock was "if Stone Cold Steve Austin" was a superhero. Well, Stone Cold doesn't have a character arc, he's just one way. That's where this movie really failed, trying to take the Austin-like antics and then make them serious and dramatic. Would we really want a Stone Cold movie where he falls in love? Fuck no. Hancock was a movie with an identity crisis.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:43:42 AM CDT

    can SOMEONE please explain the fucking EAGLE

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    ICONAGRPAHY IN THE FILM?it's everywhere! Is it presenting Hancock, as some sort of angel/ creature of good? I didn't get it.When me and the buds saw the shit storm when it came out-we ALL agreed that there must've been HEAVY EDITING, because it felt to be mising alot of informative shit! Pleaser,someone tell me they get the EAGLE signifance....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:45:50 AM CDT

    Series7 and bs9999

    by geomancer21

    "Had they just made some villian, and have him be some sort of Superman it may have worked. "Isn't that the idea behind the sequel mentioned here?"but felt like they ran out of steam half way through and felt like another script..."Ummm... cause it was. It was a Superman movie originally. Remember that Nicolas Cage as superman movie years ago that never got off the ground? This is it. they just added a new backstory to make it a different character. How else could anyone believe Nic Cage as superman? Now a disheveled drunken superman I could see him doing that. They were even considering Bill Murray for awhile.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:53:04 AM CDT

    There's no such thing as a BLACK God.

    by professor_monster

    If so the Universe would be partially complete thanks to loafing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:53:44 AM CDT

    Hancock absolutely sucked ass

    by jimmy rabbitte

    It is, by far the worst thing Will Smith has ever done. The script was clumsy and the movie couldn't decide which part of the story it wanted to tell. No sequel should ever be made for a film that was as terrible as Hancock. Kill this idea now.

    I thought Peter Berg wanted to make a new 'Dune' film. If that's the case, he should be concentrating on that project. A project like 'Dune' won't just fall together. David Lynch is an infinitely more talented director than Berg (a failed actor) will ever be; and he thoroughly screwed the pooch when he tried to make 'Dune'. If Berg is muddying his thought processes, with possible Hancock scenarios, his 'Dune' project will fail miserably.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:55:07 AM CDT

    WELL, I GUESS I FOUND OUT!!!

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    I never really searched....but here goes...sorta cool notion, and DOES explaina bit....but HANCOCK still scuked.

    (1) He is potentially immortal and has lived long enough to be living at the same time as the ancient greeks (at least 3000 years old).
    (2) The eagle symbol he wears: The symbol for zeus.

    THE AETOS DIOS was a giant, golden eagle which served as Zeus' personal messenger and animal companion. According to some, the eagle was once a mortal king named Periphas, whose virtuous rule was so celebrated that he was came to be honoured like a god. Zeus, in anger, would have smote him with a thunderbolt, but Apollon intervened and, transforming the king into an eagle, set him beside the throne of Zeus. In other accounts, Zeus adopted the eagle as his bird when it first appeared to him before the Titan War as a sign of good omen. The eagle was later sent by Zeus to carry the handsome youth Ganymedes up to heaven to become the cupbearer of the gods.

    (3) When Hancock asks Mary what there relationship is, she first tells him that she is his sistor and later that they were married. Hera was the wife and older sister of Zeus, making Mary the greek god Hera.

    (4) When Hancock said Mary was crazy, it really got to her...if you read more about Hera, she was a bit of a nutjob.'

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:55:24 AM CDT

    I want to know who "THEY" were.

    by booster gold lives

    Theron's character talked about how "they" were always after her and Hancock, trying to kill them or tear them apart. Was it a generic "they," maybe people who didn't like an interracial couple way back when? Or was the "they" someone or something out to specifically kill the immortals? That would be worth exploring, and maybe they'll fold that into this third immortal idea.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:57:43 AM CDT

    I was quite indifferent to the first one...

    by just pillow talk

    Not enough to like, not enough to hate. It was just...there.No sequel please.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:58:53 AM CDT

    I really enjoyed 9/10 of Hancock...

    by jaka

    ... and detested the last tenth. I REALLY did not enjoy the ending ("reveal") at all! So I have to agree that going backwards holds more interest to me that going forward. However, glad Jason Bateman (possibly) continues to get work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:01:41 PM CDT

    More of what sucked in the first Hancock.

    by walkindead

    The premise of the first was cool. It was that lame back story that killed it. So to make a second film flushing out what most didn't like about the first makes no sense. Pass

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:02:50 PM CDT

    CAN SOMEONE post a clip...

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    of the infamous Hancock has sex with a 17 year old and when he nuts, she flys through the roof (or some crazy b.s. LIKE THAT...)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:03:12 PM CDT

    Geomancer21???

    by series7

    I don't get it, are you some big Handcock fan or something? What are you trying to point out?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:03:33 PM CDT

    THE 3RD GOD?

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    Yep....Robert Downey Jr.!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:08:34 PM CDT

    idrinkyourmilkshake

    by series7

    From what I remember of the film, there isn't come giant Scary Movie style jiz scene. And the 17 year old was Hayley Marie Norman who is a Deal or No Deal girl and in some female hygie product commercial thats every where right now. She's pretty terrible even in the small role. In the scene they are doing it, then he throws her off and they pan outside of the trailer he lives in and holes appear in his roof. I think there is some bang noise or something, but the holes seem to just be made from air. Like they edited out giant sloddering jiz bullets or something. It was more awkward then anything which was pretty standard for this movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:09:40 PM CDT

    The first movie

    by series7

    Needed some sort of scrolling text or voice over at the start of the film explaining the whole god thing. Rather then trying to make it some lame twist half way through. So you knew what to expect since they didn't handle the transition well at all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:10:46 PM CDT

    idrinkyourmilkshake

    by series7

    Here is a photo from the jiz scene. Its when he throws her off. http://tinyurl.com/lh55f4

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:11:48 PM CDT

    eagle symbols? what are you smoking?

    by the_ad_wizard_who_came_up_with_this_one

    i cannot remember anything about hancock, least of all any eagle symbology. this is a movie with a premise that was funny for 5 minutes on screen, which will be completely forgotten in the future - and rightly so. peter berg is such a fucking hack, can somebody stop him please? when i imagine hell in a nightmare it is a place where this guy directs a dune movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:12:23 PM CDT

    The first half was good, then it became silly in the second

    by stalkeye

    The premise of a obnoxous,drunken and angry Superhero who has a PR guy is refreshing compared to the architypes that's on screen as of late. Then the story turns to shit due to revelation that Hancock and Theron's character had history and when they are together, their powers grow weaker.....oh, and there was the notable abcense of a major baddie.This Movie delivered the laughs and action during the first half and that's why I can't totally hate on Hancock.As for the Naysayers, well, I'm sure they were more content with last year's Speed Racer. XD

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:12:55 PM CDT

    The sequel no one asked for!

    by ucb agent1

    I'd be more interested in just about anything else by Berg.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:14:03 PM CDT

    Can't wait for this!!!

    by jeffreykatzenkunt

    I'm also really hoping for Ishtar 2 and Heaven's Gate 2. I simply love sequels that are necessary and feel organic (much like The Godfather 2). Oooh, I can't wait!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:16:54 PM CDT

    calling it "handcock" isn't funny

    by itrainmonkeys

    it's just lazy and stupid. Think of a better insult.......something an 8 year old might not come up with.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:19:27 PM CDT

    Stalkeye

    by the_ad_wizard_who_came_up_with_this_one

    Speed Racer was worlds more creative, engaging and less stupid than Hancock in my opinion.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:19:48 PM CDT

    Milking the superhero money teet for all it's worth

    by chuck_chuckwalla

    Hancock sucked.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:26:53 PM CDT

    Good idea, Peter Berg

    by asimovlives

    Go make another Hand-In-Cock movie, and leave Dune alone from your hack paws. Too many good properties already been ruined by fucking hacks like you, Peter Berg, it's good news you decided to do the right thing and leave Dune alone for professional and talented filmmakers. Stick to dumb fucking retard movies like your Hand-In-Cock, that's your line of specialty.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:28:18 PM CDT

    Hancock

    by hipshot

    The necessity to prevent Smith from having a sexual relationship killed the movie. This has been a pattern since "Bad Boys" and we can see that his two films that DID have it underperformed at the box office (Ali, and Seven Pounds). At the very least, remove the hyper-charge of a white blond as his putative love interest, and MAYBE the public won't flinch quite so hard. Trying to pretend that this isn't a factor is just ignoring the elephant in the living room.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:29:49 PM CDT

    I love Akiva Goldsman superhero movies!

    by zzzardozzz

    Batman Forever, Batman & Robin, Hancock--the man knows his stuff! Can't wait for Jonah Hex!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:30:25 PM CDT

    Hipshot

    by asimovlives

    I suspect the reason Will Smith had no sex scenes in his recent movies is because if he did, his wife would bust his balls and cut off his dick and feed it to the sharks. She is who wears the pants at his home, totally. The dude is his wife's bitch.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:31:21 PM CDT

    In this one Dickfoot takes on the evil "reactive mind"

    by azultool

    The "edgy" and "funny" Will Smith battles rumors of his sexual orientation by summoning the powers of Dianetics. It's projected to make $500 Million in it's opening weekend. Stick around for the extra scene at the end of the credits SPOILER ALERT: It's a hot scene featuring Will pulling a train with John Travolta and Tom Cruise next to a Volcano.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:35:12 PM CDT

    Here's how it should have been made . . .

    by the game master

    Take the premise they've got, with Hancock having lost his memory and his wife trying to distance herself to protect him because their proximity cancels their powers. That's all good. But instead of the stupid twist of her hating him (so, why protect him?), they should have had a VILLAIN come in, THAT'S how they find out their past, and THAT'S why they're reunited--the villain, perhaps one of "THEY" who hunted them in the past, straps them to the torture table together so their powers slowly drain away, eventually weak enough so he can kill them. This gives the two heroes time to talk and give exposition, explain shit, and build drama. AND, it would have given plausible cause for the standard villain "wait to kill the heroes" scenario. And best of all, it would have made them truly heroic, in that they would have had to fight their way free and beat the bad guy without powers. Instead, we just got "goddess PMS plot twist". Snore.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:37:55 PM CDT

    I'm one of the three only people in the world, who enjoyed...

    by derlanghaarige

    ...Hancockfrom the beginning to the end. Yes, it bothers me that it feels like two movies squeezed into one ("Hancock goes to jail" and "Hancock and the secret of the super woman"), but I liked the characters, I like the world it built up, I LOVED the for a silly comedy surprisingly intense and dramatic climax, all in all, I'm ready for a sequel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:42:11 PM CDT

    more zaw hell naws

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:42:32 PM CDT

    The Jiz scene?

    by mr_satan

    Where was that in the movie. I've watched that movie 5 times. Yes I liked it until the whole Theron god thing.Then it just went weird. But I still like the movie. Hancock was a dick and stayed that way even at the end where he did something not so nice to Mike Epps. And with that previous post that Hancock may be Zeus I'm even more disappointed. And why not have Mark Hamil in the next one as the Cock Knocker reprising his role from Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:42:40 PM CDT

    They should have shot the original script...

    by blackmantis

    Tonight, He Comes is one of the best I ever read. What ended up on screen bore little resemblance to it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:43:27 PM CDT

    Tonight, He Comes dream cast

    by blackmantis

    Would have loved to see Jon Hamm as Hancock and Steve Buscemi as Horus.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:44:24 PM CDT

    How did they fight if they lose their powers around each other?

    by zombieheathledger

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:45:42 PM CDT

    Why didn't Smith play Nic Cage or Black Panther?

    by zombieheathledger

    Or even Black Lightning?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:46:38 PM CDT

    I thought Hancock was such a horrible misfire.

    by kevred

    The premise was solid gold, but somehow they managed to make a dull, plodding, dreary, unfunny mess out of it. How could they miss such an easy target? It was hitting the side of a barn, for Pete's sake! And this whole god nonsense--it's like they can't decide what kind of move they want to make. I say, write this whole thing off as a major mistake and lesson of what not to do next time, and move on.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:47:15 PM CDT

    Just like Bad Boys 2 and Men II Black...

    by nasty in the pasty

    ...this is the kind of Will Smith sequel that'll make money, but no one REALLY wants. The first film had its amusing elements, but they TOTALLY blew the concept of a "superhero" who's a drunken asshole by casting one of the most likable and least-threatening movie stars on the planet and watering it down to a PG-13. And yeah, the fact that Smith rarely gets laid in the movies has a more-than-slightly racist tinge to it. Same thing with Denzel. Good-looking white actor = lots of screen pussy, whereas good-looking black actor = at most a brief kissing scene (less, if the love interest is a white chick). The only time you see black actors getting some is in "black movies".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:49:34 PM CDT

    The can be only two

    by creaturecantina

    I thought they explained in the first that all the gods came in pairs. When one died, the partner died as well. And they only got weak in the presence of their partner. So a third god would necessitate the existence of a fourth.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:51:33 PM CDT

    NO. NO MORE PREQUELS.

    by halsolo

    FAIL. So sick of that mentality, shame on you AICN for justifying the worst habits of assholes who make uncessary prequels.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:52:05 PM CDT

    The first was a big, steaming pile of donkey crap.

    by force_mccockin

    Why the fuck would I want to see more of this shit?!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:53:59 PM CDT

    Mr_Satan Re: Jizz Scene

    by stalkeye

    I think it was in the Director's cut in which HandCock is getting it on with some chick in his trailer. And yes, there was Jizz.Humorous, but best left on the cutting room floor.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:54:44 PM CDT

    cant agree with you merrick...no prequels... ever.

    by soup74

    well, almost never.. there are a few exceptions. (i wouldnt have minded 'THE' prequels if they didnt suck.) even though i actually enjoyed hancock (to a certain extent) i dont want to see a hancock prequel because the characters arent timeless, i already learned where they came from, and i dont need that story heshed out in great detail. at the District 9 Q&A in chicago of course the first question was "so..sequel?" to which neil blokamp (sp?) replied, "yeah, im thinking prequel, there are a lot of stories to tell about the aliens arriving here." I'm sure there are, but i dont want to see them after i already know what happened. if you cant think of a good continuation to a story, id rather not see a sequel at all, than a prequel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:55:21 PM CDT

    the hospital sequence ending

    by cifra

    was extremely powerful. I really don't get why Hancock was so hated, it was a really good - and interesting - take on the Superhero mythology.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:56:26 PM CDT

    oooh.. looks like someone agrees

    by soup74

    i was typing before i read your post halsolo.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:58:15 PM CDT

    The Game Master

    by mr. zeddemore

    Austin DID have a character arc. His was rebel who gets a taste of gold and likes it... to the extent where he needs it, and forms a deal with his most hated enemy... then realises he's made a mistake and goes back to who he was. Hell, did you forget they showed him MARRIED on screen?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 12:59:06 PM CDT

    series7 = class act

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    nice find.I wa always curious!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:03:25 PM CDT

    The_Ad_Wizard_Who_Came_Up_With_T his_One

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    assface...there was eagle motifs all over-wake up! I was stone in the theater when i saw this(and hated it) and STILL noticed the eagles.First,its on his skully...then,itwas on an ad on the park bench he was sleeping on, then at the bank scene, there's a GIANT EAGLE STATUE, and at the end, he's holding a fucknig eagle on his arm! Enough for you? And-that after watching it 2 years ago.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:06:01 PM CDT

    What I didn't like in Hancock

    by mr_satan

    The fact Theron went to the hospital when he was shot. She should have known to leave the country for a minute so he can recover. She was douche nozzle. And people she didn't hate Hancock she knew she had to stay away from him for his own sake.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:08:02 PM CDT

    Hancock II: The Wrath of Cock?

    by i_snake_plissken

    Hancock was a bizarre viewing experience – tonally the film shifts all over the place and never knows what it wants to be, shifting from lighter comedy to extreme melodrama at the end. I would say it’s a good example of what happens when you try and adapt a script to fit an actor rather than find an actor to fit a script (the original screenplay was a lot darker).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:08:57 PM CDT

    I ALWAYS FELT BAD FOR BATEMAN

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    because he gets shitted on! Man, your wife is a super-hero??? and some dude OBVIOUSLY has the hots for her and had a LOOONG PAST with her? I'd be fucknig super insecure with that..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:09:51 PM CDT

    Now I am curious....

    by idrinkyourmilkshake

    can ANYONE tell me major differences between shitty filmwe saw and the script?(Tonight he nutz)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:14:28 PM CDT

    The Third God Should Be Played By...

    by jews4jesus

    Michael Richards the Jew. I'd fucking watch that. Everytime he gets close to Will Smith, he starts yelling profanities and shit. Hell, his costume can even include one of those stupid midget hats.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:16:07 PM CDT

    Read original script here--

    by blackmantis

    The films are completely different. There is a drunk, washed up Superhero named Hancock. That is the ONLY similarity. And there is a version of the cut explosive jizz scene. http://tiny.cc/uHI8o

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:17:29 PM CDT

    the first one really fell apart...

    by judge briggs

    when Theron put on lots of make up and decided to beat up Will Smith... man, that movie was a pisser disappointment!and it was too childish.. and has the worst DVD cover EVER... man, this movie sucked.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:18:09 PM CDT

    Hancock must fall off the wagon for a sequel

    by kravmaguffin

    I want angry drunk superhero!
    ijs

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:18:22 PM CDT

    Spotty but enjoyable

    by larry sellers

    I thought it hit way more than missed. If anything they need to move forward because this was just an iconoclastic origin story. No prequels. I could care less about what happened before and Theron's cartoon fight scene in the middle nearly lost me. But I liked most of the film and a sequel wouldn't hurt one bit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:21:40 PM CDT

    I'm waiting for the porno version.. HANDCOCK

    by scriptgirl_nipples

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:24:19 PM CDT

    And it's sequel...

    by scriptgirl_nipples

    HANDCOCK : Two In The Pink, One In The Stink.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:32:32 PM CDT

    Aw, HELL NO...

    by spyguy

    But hey, if it keeps Will Smith from ruining the CAPTAIN AMERICA movie, go right ahead.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:35:16 PM CDT

    Tonight He Comes (Original Script)

    by i_snake_plissken

    Pretty bad actually, also meanders all over the place. Hancock is a tortured drunk asshole, although it’s never made clear why he’s so tortured. He does get a little girls cat out of a tree by killing it with a super-powered pebble fling (that was maybe the only amusing part of the script). Otherwise the characters are one-note, the dialogue cringe worthy, the ending depressing and the whole thing seems largely pointless – I wouldn’t really even say it’s worth reading, but you can find it online.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:35:21 PM CDT

    Hancock was awful

    by reckoner

    I can't believe Peter Berg and Will Smith think this is good material. Hancock was so bad it was depressing that Will Smith wasted his talents on this crap. And Peter Berg needs to stick to Michael Mann-like films, not this waste of time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:39:43 PM CDT

    No NO NO NO NOOOOOOOO!!!

    by vettebro

    Hancock sucked. It was a piece of crap. We don't want more crap. Let the Hancock "franchise"(and I say that with sarcasm) DIE!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:55:29 PM CDT

    They're making WHITE CHICKS 2....

    by turketron_2

    Your mind just melted, and I'm not kidding about this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 1:55:49 PM CDT

    Will Smith has NO TALENT. He's perfect for this shit.

    by scriptgirl_nipples

  • Aug 19, 2009 2:05:53 PM CDT

    No.

    by fiester

    Just, no.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 2:07:26 PM CDT

    Oh I hope Hancock keeps his stylish stocking hat for the sequel

    by indycollector

    Because, you know, it's stylish and all. Hey, Hancock. Your stocking hat may be stylish but it still functions like a FUCKING STOCKING HAT!!!! In Los Angeles even! Fucking kids and their music.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 2:17:32 PM CDT

    HANCOCK SUCKED DICK

    by melgibsons_dickcheese

    Seriously, it was awful.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 2:20:11 PM CDT

    Remake! Make Tonight He Comes!

    by spectrebeeyatch

    Hancock was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. The menacing villians are bank robbers and the leader is missing an arm... WTF! Horrible movie make Tonight He Comes that script was sweet!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 2:25:27 PM CDT

    HANDCOCK 2: ELECTRIC BOOGASPLOOGE

    by zombieheathledger

  • Aug 19, 2009 2:26:17 PM CDT

    Just what the universe needed...

    by fa_tass_dinomolester

    In another month we'll be getting "Zardoz 2: Eugenics Boogaloo" and the inevitable "Ishtar" remake set in the ghetto.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 2:39:33 PM CDT

    so is the 3rd god Xenu?

    by mgthedj

    Just asking?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 2:41:23 PM CDT

    I never could understand how he....

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    is the biggest star in the world. "Aww hell nah I'm fightin' aliens" "Aww hell nah I'm a man in black" Aw hell nah I'm the enemy of the state." He fuckin' sucks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:08:26 PM CDT

    EXPAND on the mythology?

    by ebolamonkey

    Peter Berg: "Hancock's mythologgy was shit, but we're looking to create a real shit-storm for the sequel. We sold a lot of tickets, so shit must be what people want, and Hancock 2 is going to deliver twice as much shit as the first one."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:14:23 PM CDT

    Yes must be Xenu

    by mgthedj

    Since the amnesia bit in the first film is straight out of Scientology. Turned the film from "Zeus and Hera are true" into "Scientology is true."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:16:34 PM CDT

    Hancock: GREAT idea. TERRIBLE execution

    by i am_notreal

    A superhero-on-the-skids action comedy was a fresh idea with tons of potential, fumbled horribly by the horrible script (what actually made it to the screen). The whole garbage with Charlize Theron's character was just wrong, wrong, wrong. Hancock is maybe THE top example of a completely bungled good idea in the last five to ten years of movies. It might be worthwhile to revisit the premise to correct some of the wretched mistakes of the first, but I'm not at all confident...and I even kinda like Peter Berg.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:36:39 PM CDT

    WHITE CHICKS 2

    by series7

    Of course they are White Chicks was a huge hit. I hope they make Dance Flick 2!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:38:02 PM CDT

    Denzel Washington refuses to have white women as romantic intere

    by asimovlives

    in his movies. I once heard his reason for that, and i think it's bulslhit. Funny shit, american TV shows like House and Heroes have less problem showing interracial couples making out then Holywood. And the neo-con fundie assholes still complain that Holywood is liberal! Liberal my ass!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:39:09 PM CDT

    Jaden Smith heh heh heh

    by kabong

    You know you want Son of Hancock.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:39:52 PM CDT

    I thouroughly enjoyed...

    by porterdsgn

    ...the first 3/4 of HANCOCK. The final 1/4 that involved Theron as another Super Hero/Goddess was crap.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:40:17 PM CDT

    I hate peter berg

    by s-mart shopper

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:42:49 PM CDT

    If they can narrow it down to 43 writers instead of 100...

    by venvariants

    Boy, talk about the last third of a movie utterly destroying the first two thirds...too many hands in the pot on that one, that's for sure.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:45:00 PM CDT

    Peter Berg can kiss my ass

    by asimovlives

    His first movie was pretty good, and i still like it. But that is one actor that should had never given up his day job. You are no Clint Eastwood, pal.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 3:59:04 PM CDT

    In the year 3000, the word "prequel" equals death.

    by tomonicker

    Freaking A! (ha,ha! brought that out of the box...) I pretty much mindwiped that movie out of my head! Please, no sequel, prequel ever!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:10:07 PM CDT

    That's what Hancock was about?

    by hobocode

    Glad I saved my money. That's some stupid shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:11:26 PM CDT

    New idea! Start with the Prequel first!

    by tomonicker

    If it's good, then sequel on... If it's bad, fuck it, then it's not meant to be. Let's pass a bill right now! ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:16:20 PM CDT

    Bateman's subplot will be expanded?

    by gheorghe zamfir

    Really? Is that what people are clamoring for in a sequel, to learn his this dude's charity program is progressing?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:16:34 PM CDT

    The greatest thing peter berg ever did

    by s-mart shopper

    was die in Smokin Aces.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:16:38 PM CDT

    Hancock and the church of Scientology

    by professor_monster

    I'd watch that

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:21:37 PM CDT

    Horrible idea

    by charlie_allnut

    Hancock was one of the worst major studio films I have ever seen. I wanted to walk out after the first ten minutes, and was only stopped by the $10 I shelled out to see it. Will Smith seemed bored and uncomfortable throughout, the writing was terrible, Bateman's character was a pathetic loser (and his charity campaign idea was beyond retarded). Terrible. I know the first was a huge hit, but I think about half the people who saw it hated it, a quarter were indifferent to it, and the other quarter kinda liked it (at least of the people I know of who saw it). Can't imagine there is a audience for this movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:30:13 PM CDT

    Denzel doesn't have white love interests in his movies?

    by azultool

    What about Dakota Fanning in 'Man on Fire'? The hottest sex scene EVER!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:34:42 PM CDT

    I Have A Much Better Idea

    by media messiah

    But I have to be paid for it. No more freebies!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 4:39:03 PM CDT

    Whenever any director talks a films Mythology - garbage ensues

    by toadkillerdog

    1) Matrix was a truly great movie. Then the W's smoked their own dope and created a 'mythology' around the character. And the two subsequent movies were full of self reverential, faux religious bullshit. 2) Pitch Black was a great flick.Then Twohy built a 'mythology' and religion around Riddick, and CoR sucked zebra shit. Moral of story, take your own shit too seriously and think it don't stink, and you wind up being buried in it. And Hancock was not that good to begin with. It had a few good scenes, but the ending completely fell apart in bad writing, and direction.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 5:22:48 PM CDT

    The Hancock mythology had/has great potential

    by performingmonkey

    I thought there were TWO fantastic movies within Hancock just itching to get out, the Hancock-the-fuckup story and the mythology angle, though sadly we only got each of them half-baked and crammed together into one. They could do a whole movie on the backstory and I know I'd like it, then a third movie where everything comes together in a huge shitstorm.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 5:29:50 PM CDT

    I was really surprised at how much I liked Hancock.

    by wyld stallyns rules

    Made me want to learn more about the mythology.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 5:30:33 PM CDT

    The Greatest Thing Peter Berg Ever Did was..............

    by ihaveseeneveryepisodeofprisonbreak

    Wes Craven's SHOCKER!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 5:32:29 PM CDT

    Denzel Washington...

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    The man could be playing a kangaroo in a kid's movie and you'd still feel heavy presence of racial overtones.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 5:52:48 PM CDT

    Homeless Alcoholic Meteor Man

    by mr_beaks_is_a_faggot

    I always thought this was what happened to meteor man after it tanked, he became a bum.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 6:00:03 PM CDT

    One of the worst movies ever put together

    by theporkchopexpress

    If only because it completely failed at what it attempted to achieve. UNless it's aim was to be a tonal rubbish tip that has no sense of pace.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 6:10:30 PM CDT

    The "god" shit is what ruined the movie in the first place

    by mr_beaks_is_a_faggot

    it was like, why the fuck did you need to do that?! if the superhero going to jail and getting some good PR is kinda charming and kinda funny.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 6:26:05 PM CDT

    Dumb movies get all the attention

    by luke_lymon

    A sequel? This is a good idea??? Seriously, this is so stupid. This movie was one of those that I HAD to walk out on. Sequel??? Get real

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 6:29:28 PM CDT

    Here's an idea for a movie

    by luke_lymon

    Ken Jennings from Jeopardy turns out to be the perfect guinea pig for an alien uniform. When he puts it on, he becomes dumb and can't fly or nothing. HUH? I like that!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 6:40:39 PM CDT

    Peter Berg's Best Movie

    by raromo

    was Very Bad Things. This is not debatable. Hancock was a mess. Charming front story, but the whole god and goddess thing was completely mishandled. Maybe there were too many rewrites. Will Smith usually has excellent instincts about what movie to do, but this time he fell on his face, ruining that big grin of his.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 6:56:10 PM CDT

    Classic Media Messiah

    by ryanbraun14

    I Have A Much Better Idea. But I have to be paid for it. No more freebies!!! -- Media MessiahVintage Media Messiah. The difference between someone who WANTS to write and the ones who have worked their asses off to master their craft and get places, is that they would write for free--cause they love it, but most importantly, to get their FOOT IN THE DOOR. I hate to break it to you, MM, but posting your ideas here like they will be used is not getting a foot in the door. Don't get me wrong, a writer can make good money on their first project, but its a matter of doing ANY and EVERYTHING to get a chance. You are such a joke because you think that these talkbacks are a chance for you. Also, EVERYONE has ideas, EVERYONE have opinions on how to make something better, but that doesn't make them writers and it doesn't make you a writer. I've read countless opinions about how to make things better from you, but you are blind to the fact that YOU ARE YOUR ONLY FAN. A few of your ideas are decent, I'll give you that, but you are not special. Not all your ideas are gold like you believe they are. SERIOUSLY, GET YOUR ASS OFF THESE TALKBACKS AND WORK ON AN ***ORIGINAL*** PROJECT. You CANNOT call yourself a writer for your efforts on these talkbacks. You CAN call yourself a writer if you get a project made, even if you don't make a penny for it. Hell, if you went to college for creative writing (which you have told me is worthless) I would call you a writer. I swear MM, you are mentally ill and after the inevitable span of months where I notice you are MIA, I would bet that your illness finally got to you and cost you your life, long before I would believe you actually got yourself together and focused your energy on something ORIGINAL and realized these talkbacks and all the time you spend on them won't do a damn thing for you as a writer--which you are not. To call yourself a writer is an absolute insult to every hard working writer on this planet period.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 7:00:20 PM CDT

    AsimovLives

    by hipshot

    Smith and Jada walked past me at the BET awards months back--she is tiny and somehow really scary, like a piranha with boobs. He says she's a Superfreak in bed. The mind boggles, just a bit,to picture THAT action.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 7:47:52 PM CDT

    Tonight, He Comes...

    by darshn22

    Did anyone else read the original script that eventually became Hancock? Its one of the best screenplays I've ever read... Anyone agree?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 7:49:27 PM CDT

    Oops I guess I'm a little late on that...

    by darshn22

    I gotta be more thorough reading these talkbacks...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 7:55:07 PM CDT

    Hancock's "mythology" sucked

    by ballyhoo

    They just kept telling us new rules, which were completely arbitrary. Worse than arbitrary actually, they don't even make sense. She remembers how brave he was for all the times he saved her. But the "we weaken each other" rule means that any time he actually wanted to protect her, he would just have to fly away. That is fucking gay,

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 7:59:16 PM CDT

    Can anyone name a good movie Peter Berg has done?

    by ganymede3010

    Because the Kingdom was a horrendous dog pile of shit. I really like him as an actor though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 8:54:29 PM CDT

    WHY!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    by lucasblows

    Hancock sucked cock.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 8:54:29 PM CDT

    dear god, no

    by aliendragqueen

  • Aug 19, 2009 9:18:08 PM CDT

    ganymede3010, Re: Peter Berg

    by ryanbraun14

    I can't tell you much, if anything, about Peter Bergh movies, but let me tell you--the guy is great with TV. Speaking as someone who is schizophrenic (and recognizes Media Messiah is textbook), Peter Berg created one of the most compelling, raw and intense shows ever seen on TV--WONDERLAND. Its about a psych ward in new york. I know this is quite a big statement, but the ONLY thing that rival's wonderland across the board is the wire. These two shows are in a complete class of their own. NOTHING compares. Also, Friday Night Lights is one of the most underappreciated shows on TV. You would be hard pressed to find a show with an ensemble of better acting performances from all the characters, plus, fantastic storylines.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 10:02:29 PM CDT

    How about "no", and move on to other films

    by br1947

    Will Smith is good when he doesn't play that same damned character. Never thought I'd say it, but he should stick to drama, he's better at it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:03:55 PM CDT

    Supposedly Wil & Jada are Bi

    by mr_beaks_is_a_faggot

    and swingers, I think that´s hot. And how they keep the romance alive. I saw her once in an Urban Outfitters when she was all metal and shit and had her crappy band. She´s tiny, before this whole Hawthorne MD shit, when she was all matrix and kewl. I think she´s way cooler than Will Smith.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:40:42 PM CDT

    No offense, dude...

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    but that was one of the gayest posts I've ever read. Go ahead, you can call me an asshole.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 19, 2009 11:53:34 PM CDT

    Peter Berg Discusses A HANCOCK Sequel!!

    by elvispresleehorsleyharveyoswaldoprahwinf

    And I discuss the finer merits of my taint!!!!!!!! (so many exclamation points, it must mean i care)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 12:16:15 AM CDT

    Aint it Exclamation Point news...

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    "Are you ready to here what the fuss is all about, Uma Thurman took a dump On Quentin's chest!!!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 12:23:36 AM CDT

    I just realized.....

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    People would probably take this site alittle more seriously if it weren't for those fucking (!) at the end of every headline. Instead it's a fucking pissing ground.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 12:24:39 AM CDT

    rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble !!!

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    (It's from 'South Park').

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 2:46:52 AM CDT

    Hancock was a piece of shit!

    by citizen sane

    I won't waste another dollar on the "franchise"!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 3:18:35 AM CDT

    Ryanbraun14: Like Hancock Was Hard To Write?

    by media messiah

    Anybody on this Talkback could have written a better movie. "Tonight, He Comes" is the original name of "Hancock" and was considered to be the greatest unproduced scrpt n Hollywood until Will Smith destroyed it by adding his script ideas, as he does with every script he gets his non writing hands on. Do I think I can best him? Yes...and so can you for that matter, so stop complaining about me. BTW...I do have great idea. It wasn't created for Hancock, but it is honestly better than what Smith and Berg are contemplating, and by leaps and bounds.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 3:22:04 AM CDT

    Amended: Ryanbraun14: Like Hancock Was Hard To Write?

    by media messiah

    Anybody on this Talkback could have written a better movie. "Tonight, He Comes" is the original name of "Hancock", and was considered to be the greatest unproduced script in Hollywood, that is, until Will Smith destroyed it by adding his script ideas, as he does with every script he gets his non-writing hands on. Do I think I can best him? Yes...and so can you, for that matter, so stop complaining about me. BTW...I do have a great idea. It wasn't created for Hancock, but it is honestly better than what Smith and Berg are contemplating, and--by leaps, and bounds.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 4:20:45 AM CDT

    The idea was fine, the film and mythology was shit

    by reflecto

    And tacked on, and nonsensical. No sequel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 4:51:59 AM CDT

    Falling asleep towards the end of the DVD...

    by burnhollywood

    The notion of a fuckup superhero was inspired, but (of course) they couldn't leave well enough alone and started taking the idea "seriously".
    WTF is the point of a sequel to just another superhero movie about a "hero" that doesn't even have a cultural grounding, like Batman, Supes, etc?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 6:23:51 AM CDT

    They should turn Bateman's character evil...

    by thecomedian

    That's what I thought they were hinting at. Everyone who wants to rule the world sees themselves as a good person. Plus by making him evil you open the plot up for Hancock and Mary to hook up.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 10:17:34 AM CDT

    Media Messiah

    by ryanbraun14

  • Aug 20, 2009 10:20:26 AM CDT

    Media Messiah

    by ryanbraun14

    MM- just because you like tinkering with others ideas does not even come close to making you a writer. Its not all about big ideas, its about dialogue, pacing, characterization, etc etc etc. You mess with ideas. that does not make you a writer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 1:11:01 PM CDT

    I guess it's good that when "Hancock" got his name...

    by kravmaguffin

    They didn't say "sign here douche bag", of course that might more accurately describe the movie...
    ijs

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 2:28:48 PM CDT

    Ryanbraun14: But I Am A Writer

    by media messiah

    You have never read one of my scripts to judge either way. As for "Hancock"'s sequel, I would not want to write it, or attempt to, but I would write a nice outline for Berg to play with. Why wouldn't I want to write a script in total? I'm lazy. If you write a script, and you do it right, it takes 3 months to write it, and another 3 months to fix, and edit it--I just wouldn't want to spend the time to do it--but my idea, and high concept, therein, is impressive.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 2:34:41 PM CDT

    MM

    by ryanbraun14

    A script written and edited in 6 months??? Only a seasoned veteran could get that done, well. Howabout you post a short excerpt so we can read just a tiny bit of something so I know if you're legit. If you're good I'll be the first one to give you credit and I would be more than willing to change my opinions of you and stop talking to you the way I have for some time now. Don't give me the dumb reason how you don't want something stolen--there are PLENTY of excerpts in ANY book, movie, tv episode, that don't reveal a damn thing about the overall idea. Step up and show me you're a writer, and not someone who just dreams of being a writer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 20, 2009 3:17:33 PM CDT

    BIG LOB would kick this guy's ass....

    by gibsonusa returns

  • Aug 20, 2009 3:17:50 PM CDT

    Hancock's ass, I mean.

    by gibsonusa returns

  • Aug 20, 2009 10:21:15 PM CDT

    Biggest piece of shit... ever perpetrated on

    by macready452

  • Aug 20, 2009 10:24:07 PM CDT

    fans of a genre!

    by macready452

    Oh you like Comics and Superheros? Here is some shit for you spend $ on. Thanks for your $10 now go fuck yourself.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 21, 2009 12:10:43 AM CDT

    Oh God no

    by orionsangels

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback