Logo

Cool News

Capone laughs at all the FUNNY PEOPLE!!!

Published at:  Jul 31, 2009 10:39:45 PM CDT


Hey everyone. Capone in Chicago here.

The opening of Judd Apatow's third film as a director (following The 40-YEAR-OLD VIRGIN and KNOCKED UP) begins in the most perfect way possible, with an old home movie clip of what I'm guessing is either a high school or college age Adam Sandler making a crank phone call to a deli. The moment isn't even polished enough to be called a "bit," but it's undoubtedly hilarious. More importantly, it could very well capture the precise moment when young Sandler knew that he wanted to be funny for a living. Of course, that's probably not what we're seeing, but I'll be damned if it don't feel like it is.

In some ways, FUNNY PEOPLE is more the story of another young comic named Ira Wright (played with a nice innocent, bewildered touch by Seth Rogen) who is just coming into his own enough that he's good and getting better at stand-up; he has the comedy bug and is just waiting for that moment when he can start getting paid for his craft. Instead, he works at a deli during the day while his roommates (Jonah Hill, as a fellow stand-up who still gets money from his parents for rent; and a comedy writer and actor played by Jason Schwartzman, whose clips from the awful fictional NBC show "Yo, Teach" are gloriously horrible) seem less desperate. Sandler's George Simmons is a world-famous man of comedy, with albums of his stand-up recordings, posters from his many movies and photos of him with big celebrities lining the walls of his home. He gets recognized everywhere he goes, and he's pretty accommodating with the fans. During a visit with his doctor, George discovers he has a rare blood disease that has a very low chance of survival, and his doctor immediately puts him on a highly experimental drug-therapy treatment.

The same night he gets his awful diagnosis, George decides he wants to hit a comedy club stage just to vent a bit. He ends up bumping Ira to the slot after him, and he proceeds to make jokes about life and death that don't hit home with the crowd. When it's Ira's turn, Ira comments on the downer set George has just done, and George actually finds the young comic funny. He asks Ira to help him write jokes for a corporate gig the next night, and eventually recruits him to be his assistant during his time of trouble, confiding in him all of his fears and inner conflict. Sandler and Rogen have the making of one of the great comedy pairings of the decade, and it makes me ache to think these two guys might never work again, because the two of them have a much more convincing chemistry than either of them do with the women in their lives.

Speaking of women, perhaps the only place that FUNNY PEOPLE really falters is with its female characters. I know that people make this complaint about Apatow, but I'd never really agreed with it until this movie. Ira makes a sweet attempt at a date with female comic Daisy (Aubrey Plaza from "Parks and Recreation," MYSTERY TEAM, and the upcoming SCOTT PILGRIM movie), but something happens that sours him (and us) to her charms--not that he wasn't given ample warning that something bad might occur if he didn't act sooner. And then there's George and the love of his life, Laura (Leslie Mann), whose character is so woefully underwritten that I actually grew to actively dislike the way she lived her life and the decisions she makes. Mann does her best to inject some kind of likability into Laura, but she engages in some of the very behavior that broke George and her up in the first place, and it left a bad taste with me. Her husband, played by the spirited Eric Bana (being allowed to use his Australian accent for once), is barely in the film, and we are rushed through his time on screen. First he comes across as a pretty decent guy, then he gets a bit of alcohol in him and turns into something of a raging dick. It doesn't feel natural or plausible.

I get that George would want to reconnect with his old flame to make amends before he dies, but when his experimental treatment seems to be getting the job done, he goes to visit her in San Francisco in one of the most awkward sequences in the movie. The pacing of the more serious moments seems off, but the laughs keep coming often and with much vigor.

When Apatow and company stick to the parts of FUNNY PEOPLE involving George and Ira, we get nothing but gold, whether what's happening on the screen is comedy jousting or some really serious moment concerning the side effects of George's treatment medication or his reminiscing about coming up in the clubs. The film is one of the most authentic looks at the world of stand-up comedy I've ever seen; it's also a sincere look at what happens when a one-time stand-up schlub becomes a multimillionaire and abandons all his old friends to live in a furnished mansion and have sex with random women. This is not exactly a take on Sandler's life, but I kept putting Eddie Murphy's face into this scenario and it almost hits the spot. Apatow has gone above and beyond in putting together a persona for George that I completely bought, from the comedy pairings illustrated in the many movie posters in his home, to his famous friends who show up at his congratulations-for-not-dying party (not to ruin what you probably already know, but a very famous rapper has a note-perfect cameo in this scene), to the way George dresses down Ira when he's feeling crappy about his own life.

The good news is that there's not nearly as much of the stuff I didn't like about FUNNY PEOPLE as there is the stuff I did like. Is it too long? Probably, but there's so much good about this movie, I don't think I'd consider making any major cuts. And the DVD deleted scenes will be extraordinary and endless. Sandler is quite good in a role that requires him to work the full spectrum of emotions, but the real surprise for me (and I believe this will be the last time he surprises me) is Seth Rogen, who is essentially a stand-in for a role that Apatow played in Sandler's life years ago. We actually get to see Rogen mature and build confidence, both as a comic and a human being, and it's a genuinely awesome transformation to watch. He's not out to steal the movie from anyone, but he always manages to, by simply being genuine and honest to a fault. FUNNY PEOPLE has many big laughs, punctuated by some really striking moments of contemplation and reflection.


-- Capone
capone@aintitcoolmail.com
Follow Me On Twitter






    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 10:33:16 PM CDT

    I don't get Apatow as funny

    by soylentmean

    dramatically twisted, yes, but ROFLMAO funny? Nope.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 10:36:07 PM CDT

    FIRST!!

    by lockesbrokenleg

    Prepare for the negativity!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 10:36:42 PM CDT

    Punch Drunk Love was brilliant

    by soylentmean

    but what Sandler needs to do is straight up, balls to the wall Horror. I'm not including Little Nicky here. That's a completely different level of Horror.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 10:37:21 PM CDT

    Sweet, I denied lockesuselessfemur

    by soylentmean

    That's some cherry topped goodness right there!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 10:39:19 PM CDT

    If this gets even remotely positive reviews I might see it

    by soylentmean

    But it needs a string of about 10 positive reviews filled with unabashed love. But I'm gonna see Orphan, The Collector, and the motherfuckin' Hurt Locker (which somehow, unexpectedly, is playing near me) before I see this movie.

    This summer has worn me out with disappointment.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 10:50:00 PM CDT

    See Hurt Locker three times

    by garbageman33

    And skip all that other nonsense.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 11:05:54 PM CDT

    Young Adam Sandler

    by zootrain

    "More importantly, it could very well capture the precise moment when young Sandler knew that he wanted to be funny for a living." He's 42. When's he gonna start getting funny. He was amusing on SNL. But after that. Not so much. He has two characters that he recycles. His dramatic work is better.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 11:08:10 PM CDT

    HAPPY GILMORE

    by lockesbrokenleg

    Still the best!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 11:12:58 PM CDT

    This movie doesn't look funny from the trailers

    by sirbiatchreturns

    so it will get skipped. And this coming from a fan of 40 Year Old Virgin and a guy who saw "Knocked Up" in theater (though, I haven't had the urge to watch the movie since)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 11:32:56 PM CDT

    as someone

    by so-crates

    who doesn't have the wild dislike for the apatow gang that most talkbackers seem to have (just like anything remotely popular or well-received in this world) and someone who is a huge fan of the 40 year old virgin and an admirer of Knocked Up, I found Funny People to be a mess of a movie that was entirely too long (not that length in and of itself can ruin a movie, but this felt like they made both the first movie and the sequel rolled into one in this flick), unfocused, made up of entirely unlikable characters (aside from Schmira), and only funny in about 5 or 6 spots. I was severely disappointed in the movie and would not recommend this film to Apatow admirers or haters. I'm almost tempted to say this film was crap, but it had some redeeming moments. Not many, but some. But then again, the sun shines on a dog's ass every once in a while too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 11:36:45 PM CDT

    Seth Rogen loves to suck a vagrants balls.

    by seth_rogens_hairy_breasts

    And tongue the anus just a lil' bit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 11:42:41 PM CDT

    Q: Are we surprised at this review?

    by axel fff

    A: Not at all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 11:43:10 PM CDT

    Q: Are We Not Men?

    by axel fff

    A: We Are Devo!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jul 31, 2009 11:52:48 PM CDT

    lockesbrokenleg

    by daremo

    Another "FIRST!" douche bag, even more pathetic when made SoylentMean's bitch. You're a bigger failure then dog shit on a shoe.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:11:41 AM CDT

    I got a feeling....

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    the entire gang will be gone in less than 5 years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:26:10 AM CDT

    Actually, the review is good.

    by v'shael

    But it only serves to underscore for me how utterly horrible this so-called viral marketing campaign was.

    I think the studio really fucking bombed when it came to marketing this correctly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:30:39 AM CDT

    Nothing you can say will make me see this

    by manifestchaos

    And I'm not going to blindly condemn it as the worst thing since feminism like some people are doing to G.I. Joe, but between all the trailers and the praise-filled AICN reviews, still nobody has managed to say or do anything that sparks the slightest bit of my interest in what looks like a drearily maudlin story populated by one-trick ponies going through the motions.Maybe you could lie and say Sean Connery came out of retirement to play a walk-on role or something . . . ?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:34:59 AM CDT

    this was a very funny and sad film

    by antonphd

    i disagree about the women. i think they were treated equal to the men. that may not sit well, but it's more realistic. women are 3 dimensional people as well. they deserve to fuck up and want and change their minds and be just messy. sure the stories are usually about men like this who get their shit together and come down to earth to be with the good sensible woman, but in this story's world, like the real world, women are just as complicated as men. i loved it. i loved the whole movie. great from beginning to end. my favorite moment is "i've decided to forgive him this morning". what an unbelievably wonderful line.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:35:42 AM CDT

    SLURP SLURP SLURP

    by mr spork

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:44:01 AM CDT

    this movie isn't for everyone

    by antonphd

    it's for people who are willing to pull back from the bullshit at take a long look at life. it isn't the opposite of an Adam Sandler movie, because those movies are just silly good fun. like going to a fair. this movie was just plain utterly honest. it doesn't really have answers and it doesn't even really ask any hard questions. it really was more like getting to sit down with someone older who will tell you about their life. not someone who is wise and tells you how to live. just someone who has lived and tells you about it. and the film is also filled with dick jokes. which are in fact funny. and they relieve the tension from a very honest dramatic story. if there is a moral to this story. i think there is one slipped in a little tiny bit. maybe more of a theme. it is that

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:44:04 AM CDT

    Katherine Heigl....

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    must be pretty two-faced. eh?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:49:57 AM CDT

    Might have okay opening, but repeat business will be tough.

    by juansanchez

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:52:13 AM CDT

    Heigl is a raging THUNDERCUNT.

    by juansanchez

  • Aug 01, 2009 12:53:01 AM CDT

    SoylentMean - Hurt Locker is solid. One of the year's best.

    by juansanchez

  • Aug 01, 2009 1:01:09 AM CDT

    This is meant to be a sad movie, a brutally honest one

    by drturing

    you should see while you have the chance as hardly anyone gets to make a studio picture that even tries this any longer. Although the world of comedy has been Apatow's muse and home, I'm really glad someone showed with total harsh honesty the competition and neuroses that poison friendships involved in any creative subculture. It often reminded me of the tribulations my online community of gay Thundercats fan fiction writers go through on a month to month basis - there are the superstars, like the guy who wrote "Mumm-Ra's Mommy fetish", who we all put on a pedastal, and when he got sciatica from his passionate writing, he did not change for the better.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 1:01:40 AM CDT

    A cock juggling thundercunt, no less

    by drturing

  • Aug 01, 2009 1:02:34 AM CDT

    DGDB got sick and did not become a better person

    by drturing

    also, people totally stole my joke about Capone's actor credits on his GI Joe review.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 1:52:07 AM CDT

    FUNNY PEOPLE just screams "catch in on cable"

    by zombieheathledger

    DISTRICT 9 on the other hand...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 2:25:41 AM CDT

    GREAT REVIEW.

    by mennen

  • Aug 01, 2009 3:57:46 AM CDT

    NEW DISTRICT 9 PROMO, VERY COOL....

    by carlthormark1978

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Cy9u_-O54

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 4:17:44 AM CDT

    Really? Not plausible??

    by kgb33

    'First he comes across as a pretty decent guy, then he gets a bit of alcohol in him and turns into something of a raging dick. It doesn't feel natural or plausible.' You must not get out much.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 4:19:00 AM CDT

    dubious

    by mynemaborat

    dubious about this one... i'm a bit tired of apatow casting the same crew in every one of his pictures. i get it that he's loyal and all that but really, try and mix it up a bit hey? this schtick gets old pretty damn fast, itd be nice to have some new faces give it a whirl. and i really don't like leslie mann on screen

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:13:09 AM CDT

    It ends after an hour and a half

    by zikade zarathos

    and then just keeps on going for another hour. I know you wanna cram your wife and kids into this Judd but jeez the movie's OVER, let it end already!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:26:49 AM CDT

    Meh

    by karl childers

    This is one of those movies you put on your Netflix que and hold off quite a while before letting it actually ship. By that time, you find it playing on HBO or Skinamax, watch it, and are glad you had a better movie in your mailbox waiting to be watched to make you forget the mediocrity of this so-so comedy. Apatow really needs to rethink his casting choices from now on. He needs to quit drumming up Rogen as a leading man. He needs to work with other actors and not the same stale crew that helped put him where he is today.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:49:15 AM CDT

    This is a movie you catch on FX or TNT or something.

    by juansanchez

  • Aug 01, 2009 6:36:45 AM CDT

    Watch In The Loop instead...

    by the wrong guy

    Apatow = overrated.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:02:17 AM CDT

    AINTITCOOLJEWS

    by zombieheathledger

    They control all the media I tells ya!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:05:01 AM CDT

    seth rogen josh can suck my onion bhajis

    by mixedcompany

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:31:51 AM CDT

    I won't waste any more money on a Apatow/Rogen film

    by boynamedsue

    Knocked Up got great reviews, but I thought it was incredibly dull, wasn't funny and needed to be cut by at least 30 minutes!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:51:12 AM CDT

    I also laugh at all the FUNNY PEOPLE

    by maxphallus

    Those poor basterds, thank fark its not me... HA AH AHA HAHAHAHAHA

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 8:08:08 AM CDT

    Even 40YOV was too long. Knocked Up was worse. Now..

    by juansanchez

    146 minutes. Apatow needs to be held to 2 hours max.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 9:09:20 AM CDT

    if

    by so-crates

    the theatrical version of this snoozefest was 146 minutes, i shudder to think how long the "unrated and extended" version on DVD will be. my guess on the over under is 3 hours anyone else?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 9:58:33 AM CDT

    So-Crates - I'll go with 2 hours and 52 minutes.

    by juansanchez

  • Aug 01, 2009 10:15:41 AM CDT

    I saw it last night. It was Awesome!

    by my_iq_is_135

  • Aug 01, 2009 11:39:37 AM CDT

    saw it yesterday

    by beniffer

    I liked it .. a bit too long for me .. would have liked a more "respect to standup" sort of movie, with clips of some of the cameos best routines ... but otherwise a funny flick with decent people in it .. a homerun? nah ..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 2:15:14 PM CDT

    So this is a 2 1/2 hour comedy?

    by orbots commander

    I thought experienced funny guys like Apatow knew that comedies past the 90 minute mark almost never work well.

    And I say this as a guy who has liked pretty much all of Apatow's filmography. My least favorite is probably Pineaple Express. It was gold for an hour plus, but they really had to include that warehouse shoot-out finale and turn it into a Rush Hour retread? Ugh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 2:46:57 PM CDT

    First 90 min = brilliant, last 60 = disastrous.

    by kid idioteque

    This one hurts a little because it had the potential to be one of the all time greats. But the third act is just foul and ruins a lot of good will from the first 2.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 3:17:49 PM CDT

    its 2.5 hours ?

    by supermarch

    I fell asleep during one of the commercials so no way can I handle 2.5 hours of awkward jewmour.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 3:25:19 PM CDT

    WATCH AS SHITHEADS LEARN ABOUT LIFE, LOVE, AND FRIENDSHIP.

    by haterofcrap

    I saw apatow and sandler on charlie rose. couple of mutual asskissing megadouches. will the next flavor of the week director please stand up?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 3:29:46 PM CDT

    Did Peter Jackson direct this?

    by lockesbrokenleg

    I would like to see him direct a comedy. He has to break out of that shitty cheap horror shit he's used too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 3:49:05 PM CDT

    i don't understand apatow hate

    by readyoufool

    I don't understand why it's cool to slam him now. Everyone raved about 40year old virgin. Pretty much the same for Knocked Up. Now he's a pariah? What the fuck? It really does come across as "we hate the successful guy". Someone actually said "This movie doesn't look funny from the trailers and so it will get skipped" and no one slammed that person for it. The transformers 2 TB was less one-sided.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 3:51:59 PM CDT

    by the way

    by readyoufool

    to the person who said "This movie doesn't look funny from the trailers and so it will get skipped", You are a gigantic poop nozzle attached to a diarrhetic child's bottom. You, sir, are a bum. A no good bum.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 4:02:13 PM CDT

    mynemaborat is correct

    by readyoufool

    Yeah, Apatow's a real idiot for wanting to follow in the loser footsteps of such losers as Python and PTA. How did he not realize that his career and the quality of his films would suffer if he used an ensemble cast that kept getting better with age because they knew eachother's cues and spurred each other on to new challenges? How was it that he missed that and just blindly continued on in the stead of people like Christopher Guest and Robert Altman. Apatow clearly has missed the boat and understands nothing of film making.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 4:07:10 PM CDT

    timing ...

    by beniffer

    I think they do quite well ... again, with age they will get better

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 4:29:00 PM CDT

    HAHA. LOOK AT HOW PEOPLE APOLOGIZE FOR THIS SHIT

    by haterofcrap

    with age this will all be forgotten. these movies are not ensembles, they are CLIQUES. losers who are now the "cool" kids. but they're not cool, or really anything upwardly lifting, creative, or even amusing. and I have always hated apatows shit movies and shows. Freaks and geeks sucked, 40 year old virgin was fucking annoying, knocked up deserves to be knocked out of existence, and zohan needs to be vomited on and fucked by the vomit guy from stern. no need to elaborate any further.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 4:34:51 PM CDT

    haterofcrap

    by readyoufool

    you are a wordsmith sir, that's what you are.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 4:46:52 PM CDT

    BUT WHAT ABOUT HAPPY GILMORE?!!

    by lockesbrokenleg

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:08:25 PM CDT

    apatow's biggest fan is apatow

    by erockwilly

    if he would stop thinking so highly of himself he'd be able to edit his films to under 2 HOURS! give us a break already. 90 MINUTES!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:20:27 PM CDT

    weak reviews flooding in from all over the net. Weak movie

    by doctorzoidberg

    Freaks and Geeks, and all of Apatow's older stuff is gold. He is now lost in the maze of hollywood bullshit that encompasses all projects that are not truly independent. And you can count them on one hand. Seriously, one hand.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:22:26 PM CDT

    Does anyone remember...

    by rfid

    ...when AICN was still relevant? Ah, those were the days.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:22:37 PM CDT

    Oh and Adam Sandler is a douchnozzle. Sorry but it is true

    by doctorzoidberg

    I want to like the guy, but I can't. Douchenozzle. Douchenozzle.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:23:04 PM CDT

    No I don't remember when AICN was relevant.

    by doctorzoidberg

  • Aug 01, 2009 5:24:16 PM CDT

    erockwilly, 90 min is under 2 hours son.

    by doctorzoidberg

    Just math, nothing more.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 6:02:25 PM CDT

    Maybe he meant 90 min is a good length for a comedy

    by axel fff

    and 90 min is under 2 hours. Good to see you can do math, too, Doc.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 6:03:23 PM CDT

    This movie was yawn inducingly funny

    by the dum guy

    The first hour was funny, the part with Mathers getting pissed at Ray was hilarious "I thought everybody loved you."Shortly after that, I don't think I laughed more than once or twice.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 6:18:20 PM CDT

    readyyoufool

    by mynemaborat

    yeah you're making one big assumption there funny guy... that the ensemble cast ARE actually getting better with age... as opposed to, oh say, just getting tired and bored by churning out the same jokes in different disguises. what makes you think that just because he's using the same actors that automatically means he's heading down the same path to greatness as groups like monty python? i'd say at the moment his path is more comparable to that of kevin smith. the same shit under a different name, not great or classic. now i'm no apatow hater, i liked virgin and knocked up, but i think he should try different things and different actors.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 6:29:04 PM CDT

    The Hangover is still the best

    by lockesbrokenleg

    and it didn't even have well known people in it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:13:34 PM CDT

    SEE THE DAMN MOVIE.

    by rorschach1

    Don't say that it won't be funny. You're the kinda dicks that sit the whole movie whining about things you didn't like, so frequently that you forget to laugh.
    It's incredibly well-produced, well-written, earnest, hilarious, and it was a great experience.
    ALSO! Don't say the marketing campaign wasn't well-thought out because there wasn't a day that went by that I didn't see something about it on the internet or on tv.
    And if you've seeeeen the movie, you'll understand the "Yo Teach" marketing campaign. It's not "viral", its immersive. It brings you into the world of the movie where you relate this crappy children's sitcom to shows that actually exist and you get to meet Schwartzman's character who is fantastic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:15:13 PM CDT

    Who directed this piece of shit?

    by garbageman33

    Whoever he is, he needs to watch the garage door opener episode of 'Freaks and Geeks' about 100 fucking times. Or until he realizes that an audience can decide on their own how to feel. They don't need to be hit over the fucking head with a 2X4 every time you want to make a point. Goodwill from the aforementioned F&G has its limits.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:15:45 PM CDT

    Also Adam Sandler's Best Performance Ever

    by rorschach1

    He plays the hell out of the character and makes George Simmon's seem like that's how Adam Sandler really is even though none of it is at all true.
    JUST SEE THE MOVIE AND STOP BITCHIN.
    The Hangover is a different type of movie so don't compare them.
    The Hangover was amazing but there's more than one level of funny.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:20:34 PM CDT

    Really, Rorschach1?

    by garbageman33

    I'm not being a dick here, but honestly, tell me what you liked about this movie. I didn't find a single moment that felt real. The disease was the very definition of a plot device. And everything that came after it was movie of the week level melodrama. But with worse acting. Oh, and not a single character was likable. Which is fine. But none of them were relatable, either. I think Judd made a movie that will appeal to selfish standup comedians in L.A. and absolutely no one else. The point to showing an insular world is to give you some insight into why they are the way they are. 2 1/2 hours later, I have no fucking idea. So, really, tell me what I missed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 7:27:11 PM CDT

    Word of mouth on this thing is going to be toxic

    by garbageman33

    Does a 600% drop next weekend sound unreasonable?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 10:23:41 PM CDT

    The title is called Funny People.

    by burnednotice_dude

    Trailer didn't grab me. Tv previews didn't grab me either. If I cannot get hooked via one of those two then there's no hope for me to see this. It just doesn't look good. Will wait for a free dvd rental or the $3.00 discount bin at Target.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 11:26:10 PM CDT

    Funny People = Great Gatsby

    by tenenbaum

    Simmons = Gatsby
    Ira = Nick
    Laura = Daisy
    Clarke = Tom

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 11:40:47 PM CDT

    Tenenbaum

    by the dum guy

    I can see how that it is kind'a like Gatsby, except that Gatsby was a false richy and Simmons is actually what Gatsby wished that he was, a rich guy made by his own way into a fortune.I see Funny People as more of drama/comedy on the pitfalls of trying to achieve fame (i.e. suck'sess) over trying to be a good person.I read Steve Martin's book 'Born Standing Up' and had a better understanding of a up-and-coming comic striving for movie star-dom than this pic.But, I applaud you on seeing the similiar story points (actually, your' insight makes the film seem even more shallow).... (I've read Gatsby ((as most have)) and by comparing, I see it as a lesser version.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 01, 2009 11:59:34 PM CDT

    The Great Gatsby was funnier

    by garbageman33

    Much funnier.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 2:06:02 AM CDT

    Sadler rules in...

    by human_bean_juice_

    Bill and Ted's Bogues Journey!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 2:08:37 AM CDT

    Garbageman33.

    by rorschach1

    Here's the deal. Everything you just said is a complete matter of opinion, that could be modified by what you've been through in your life. I say the characters are interesting, likable, and relatable, and you can feel the opposite. So I said none of those things. And if these guys are making more than you will make in your entire life from acting, I'm pretty sure there's got to be something to it.
    Seth Rogen has his annoying moments, but its because the character is HUMAN. That's why its believable. Everyone is extremely flawed, but they try to do what they think is right for themselves. Like you're trying to do what's right for yourself by taking your frustration out on someone stating an opinion of a movie. I'm trying to be courteous sir, but can I really trust the opinions in artistic expression of a person who calls themselves "Garbageman"? Valid and shockingly true.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 3:57:39 AM CDT

    how was it....

    by cheyne_stoking_dms

    I dont read from these guys.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 4:33:30 AM CDT

    Here are the Necessary Cuts

    by citizen6

    Good movie, but Apatow let his kids frolic around on screeen for way too long. Here are 20 mins of cuts that someone should have had the balls to insist upon:

    1. The entire SF airport scene. Could have been handled faster elsewhere.
    2. The kids watching 'Yo, Teach!' with Rogen
    3. The rugby watching scene
    4. The 'insulting aussie accent' scene. Fine for the trailer, but should have been left there.
    5. And the Eminem scene. Didn't work, sorry, even though it was moderately funny.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 5:21:05 AM CDT

    I only laughed a few times

    by bass ackwards

    I sure smiled a whole lot though, but I actually really, really liked the movie. Might be a bit long for me to take on any rewatching duties, but first time around its definitely won me over.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 6:38:28 AM CDT

    Friday haul $4 million < Superbad, $1 million < Knocked Up

    by juansanchez

    < means less than.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 7:07:05 AM CDT

    Life experiences?

    by garbageman33

    Actually, I've been through living at home while my father slowly died of cancer. So yes, I could certainly relate to someone being gravely ill. But that's the thing. His situation never seemed grave to me. There was one cheesy montage and he got really winded when he went swimming that one time. That's it. I'm not asking for Brian's Song. But if you don't convey the severity of his situation, how am I supposed to respond to him being changed by it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 7:14:36 AM CDT

    By the way, everything is a matter of opinion

    by garbageman33

    This is a movie opinion site. It's not a site where we point out which scenes had the boom mike dangling into frame. Or argue about historical inaccuracies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 7:18:12 AM CDT

    Damn You Michael Bay

    by mcmlxxvi

    Damn You Michael Bay

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 7:41:45 AM CDT

    Looking back...

    by darkman

    I think the trailer was a warning; a 3 1/2 minute trailer? Instant red flag. A 2 1/2 hour comedy(-drama)? Can we say 'self-indulgent'?

    And it's sad that people are still hating on Katherine Heigl. I guess that guys are so distracted by what comes out of her mouth, they tend to forget they want to put it in her butt. Don't worry; happens to the best of us. Not me, though. When it comes to stuff like this, I have a mind like an elephant; I *never* forget.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 9:08:55 AM CDT

    Riddle Me This, Dick.

    by rorschach1

    Did I tell you that you couldn't dislike the movie? No. At no point did I tell someone who didn't like the movie that they were wrong for it. I'm telling people who haven't actually seen the movie not to judge by what others say. Think what you want, bro, but I'm telling you for a fact you personally can't make a better film. If you can find a funnier way for a man to go through believing he's dying of cancer, go for the gold, Michelle Kwan. But until then, I will fight you with the belief that people shouldn't pass judgement on movies they haven't seen, or whole-heartedly despise an artistic expression. So. Have at thee, douchebag.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 9:54:29 AM CDT

    I'm glad you liked it.

    by garbageman33

    Really, I am. Personally, I prefer characters who aren't one dimensional. Especially when they all have the same single dimension (insecurity). I found it a bit like watching a Woody Allen movie in which all the characters were Woody Allen. But hey, that's just me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 10:37:39 AM CDT

    This whole contrarian-talkbacker thing is getting old

    by dr sauch

    Come the fuck on. There's always one or two yahoos who literally hate anything that anyone popular ever does. Apatow not funny? Rogen not funny? Jesus. I mean, they don't have to be your favorite, but to say that they have no talent is just absurd.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 11:42:24 AM CDT

    $23 million weekend. I guess that's funny

    by borock_a_boomer

    For an assfuck

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 02, 2009 2:52:50 PM CDT

    Hey, it made more than Public Enemies did

    by lockesbrokenleg

  • Aug 02, 2009 5:04:46 PM CDT

    The Writing for Rogen Was Atrocious...

    by blhotz

    but everything else was pretty good. Corney or just plain strange doesn't begin to explain most of Rogen's absurd dialogue. Also it does run a little long. Apatow's wife is super-hot. This movie is worth renting but no way worth seeing in the theatre.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback