Logo

Cool News

Universal Explores A New World Of Gods And Monsters, Pushes Forward With BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN Remake!

Published at:  Jun 17, 2009 3:04:16 AM CDT

Beaks here...



James Whale's BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN is the crown jewel in Universal's Classic Monsters library. It is the one movie you aren't allowed to fuck up. Just ask Franc Roddam. If you can find him*.

The problem with remaking James Whale's BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN is you're tethered to that title for marketing purposes. If you simply decided to embellish the companion-creating element of Shelley's story under a different title, you might be able to avoid comparisons to Whale's classic. But when you invoke that title, there's the memory of a beautifully written, surprisingly funny, and bravely subversive (particularly in terms of its homosexual subtext) masterpiece that cannot be surpassed. Probably. Unless you're supremely fucking talented.

I like Neil Burger (the writer-director of INTERVIEW WITH THE ASSASSIN, THE ILLUSIONIST and the seriously underrated THE LUCKY ONES), but "supremely fucking talented"? Show me.

It looks like he's going to get his chance under the aegis of Universal and Imagine. Both companies have been trying to get a BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN remake off the ground for years now, stretching back to 2004, when AMERICAN SPLENDOR's Shari Springer Berman and Robert Pulcini were hired to the contemporize the material. Whereas Berman and Pulcini wanted to make a movie about a young woman being "unnaturally" resurrected, Burger is apparently going in another direction with his take. I sincerely hopes this means he isn't going period, because that would be a huge mistake. That said, I also hope he isn't trying to goof around with the cloning issue, because that's old hat anymore. And I don't know how you work in Pretorious without directly referencing Whale's movie.

Most of all, I just don't know "Why?".

Burger is obviously talented, but I wish he had more of a genre background, as John Carpenter did when he tackled the already-great THE THING FROM ANOTHER WORLD. For all of my misgivings, there is a way forward here. It's just going to take a brilliant filmmaker with a unique vision to blaze that trail. Anyone care to make the case for Burger being that guy?

For more on Universal's Neil Burger experiment, check out Steven Zeitchik's story at The Hollywood Reporter.

*And I realize that was a Columbia Pictures production. Doesn't change the fact that he called his movie THE BRIDE. Should've stuck to the story about the monster and his little buddy; the Sting/Beals business was dreadful.



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 2:45:14 AM CDT

    Me

    by palimpsest

  • Jun 17, 2009 2:46:20 AM CDT

    You

    by brighteyes

  • Jun 17, 2009 2:46:59 AM CDT

    Actually I cocked my post up - apologies

    by palimpsest

    I was going to write something about how pointless a remake of BRIDE is without the context of the first story. You want to come at this kind of story, why not adapt Peter Ackroyd's THE CASEBOOK OF VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 2:48:10 AM CDT

    true

    by brighteyes

  • Jun 17, 2009 3:28:45 AM CDT

    Oh God no!

    by redwingshoolihan

    Why remake a classic. Why not remake a movie that had a good premise but failed to deliver. Like Last Action Hero, or Howard the Duck.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 3:31:28 AM CDT

    Confirmed,

    by aitrus233

    a Citizen Kane remake in a few years. Also I see no reason to remake Last Action Hero. I love it as is.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 4:03:15 AM CDT

    Remake Universal. It's lost it's mind.

    by dingbatty

    It needs a new brain, like Frankenstein's Monster/Demon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 4:38:31 AM CDT

    Bloody Hell

    by mikeoutwest

    Why not just remaster and re-release the original movie? Why would anyone want to go near this - it would be like trying to remake Citizen Kane.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 4:41:05 AM CDT

    hahaha

    by mikeoutwest

    sorry Aitrus233 I hadn't seen your post.

    Maybe Universal is getting high on the rushes from The Wolfman and have become emboldened to slaughter their sacred calf.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 4:52:43 AM CDT

    Ouch

    by kwisatzhaderach

    A calamity is looming on the horizon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Wouldn't that make more sense?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 5:19:22 AM CDT

    ...or is this a continuation of the Rober DeNiro version?

    by mike_d

    I'm confused.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 5:20:11 AM CDT

    BTW, when is "The Wolf Man" gonna be released?

    by mike_d

  • Jun 17, 2009 5:20:29 AM CDT

    Am I asking too many questions?

    by mike_d

    I think so.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 5:31:48 AM CDT

    No Mike_D

    by kenny8

    They're very good questions

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 5:51:32 AM CDT

    The first Frankenstein movie

    by hagceli

    is actually pretty boring. "Bride" is in a totally different league. One of the few times in movie history when the 2nd part was far better than the original one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 5:54:03 AM CDT

    Remake the Execs at Universal...

    by ajd_1

    ....into credible human beings!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 6:12:48 AM CDT

    WOLF MAN release is early November

    by palimpsest

  • Jun 17, 2009 6:29:56 AM CDT

    The Illusionist was terrible

    by johnryder

  • Jun 17, 2009 6:30:50 AM CDT

    Oh joy...

    by the_skook

    What a surprise! They're doing a remake of a classic movie. Well blow me down with a feather, who'd have thought it! What a brilliant idea to take a flawless movie and imagine you can do it better. How big are these guys egos?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 6:59:06 AM CDT

    Why is going period a mistake???

    by odm

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:03:14 AM CDT

    I Actually Really Liked The Bride When I First Saw It

    by kevinwillis.net

    In 1986, or thereabouts. Senior year of high school or the summer before. Not sure what I would think of it now. Been a long time . . .

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:04:50 AM CDT

    "because that's old hat anymore"

    by kevinwillis.net

    Beaks needs more rest. AICN is working him too hard.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:17:07 AM CDT

    Steve Zahn as the bride!!!!

    by mysterious_volvo

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:17:11 AM CDT

    AGAIN with the unnecessary remakes/re-imaginings...

    by grandpa bunche

    Fuck this movie in the ear. Stick with the classic version and if the absolutely must, have the filmmakers do something original. I know that's asking a lot these days, but...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:20:23 AM CDT

    Hmmmn we've got The Wolfman, now this...

    by yeti

    Wonder if they'll ressurect The Mummy (it's been ten years) Dracula (it's been 17) or any of their other signature monsters (and hell to the no! I don't count Van Helsing in this at all)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:37:09 AM CDT

    Have you noticed that the movies making good money this year.

    by hallmitchell

    Are newish films.
    UP, Hangover, Paul B. Mall Cop, Grand torino as compared to T4, Watchmen, Wolverine etc.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:38:36 AM CDT

    Do not set this in modern times. Gotta be 1800's.

    by harryblackpotter

    Or earlier. Oh, and The Bride isn't that bad. Clancy Brown's monster is the best thing about it. Sting is crap in it tho.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:41:50 AM CDT

    Coppola's Dracula 17 years old? Jesus!

    by harryblackpotter

    I'm getting old. Dracula's gotta be on the remake cards, surely. And wasn't Alex Proyas supposed to be making Dracula: Year Zero at some stage?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 8:05:46 AM CDT

    universal was going to go remake crazy after

    by robamenta

    val helsing...they had all kinds of plans for movies, theme parks, cartoon etc etc. but when that film tanked, they dropped all those plans...looks like they are getting itchy to go forward again

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 8:35:49 AM CDT

    YES!!!

    by classyfredblassy

    I was just sitting in bed with with my best girl when I said to her "you know bitch, why aren't there any remakes being made?" It's about time, I am sick of new ideas being tried. Remake everything!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 8:35:50 AM CDT

    Beaks, aren't you unfairly pigeon-holing Burger

    by filmcoyote

    He can't make a genre film because he has no gnre background?! There has to be a first one right? Are all filmmakers supposed to stick to one type of film their whole lives? Should Spielberg not have been allowed to make Color Purple because he hadn't made a film like it before? Should Cameron not have been allowed to make Titanic because it wasn't sci-fi and didn't have Arnold? Should Rob Reiner not have been allowed to make Stand By Me because it wasn't a comedy? Should Demme not have been allowed to make Silence Of The Lambs? I could go on like this forever!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 8:36:09 AM CDT

    NO!!!!

    by shatoichi

    Why remake (and probably f**k up) a classic? I liked 'The Illusionist', but come on :P Though strangely enough, am dying to see the Wolfman remake ;) The worst thing about remakes is that if they're godawful, then it taints the original. Hollywood really needs to find some original material!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 8:37:21 AM CDT

    And jesus yes, Coppola's Dracula is that old...:O

    by shatoichi

    How time flies...:P

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 9:07:35 AM CDT

    THE ILLUSIONIST

    by logan_1973

    Is a masterpiece. This might actually work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 9:19:38 AM CDT

    MAKE IT PERIOD.....

    by dannyglovers_dickblood

    No one is going to see this shit set in modern times. Fuck that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 9:35:17 AM CDT

    THIS ISN'T COOL NEWS! THIS IS BLACK MAGIC!

    by thefunkyenigma

    Megan Fox for the bride!

    "Henry you fool! You used toes instead of thumbs!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 9:50:47 AM CDT

    You have to ask why?

    by johnny rocket7

    ...Follow the money Beaks....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 9:56:20 AM CDT

    Honestly, Gents...why are we shocked?

    by blue_demon

    Screw it! Remake everything!"The Exorcist" is over 30 years old! Get cracking! Abigail Breslin as Regan! You know you want to see it! Johnny Depp in old age make-up as Father Merrin! GAAAAHHHHHHH!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 10:00:42 AM CDT

    CONTEMPORARY?!!!!! BEAKS?!!!! REALL?!!

    by underoos hero

    Really Beaks? The last thing I want to see is Chris Pine as Victor Frankenstein in a college lab using his i phone to resurrect his girlfriend that got hit by a car and then call it, "The Bride Of Frankenstein." That's about how completely asinine it would be. **shakes head and wonders, why?**

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 10:20:50 AM CDT

    Where's Creature from the Black Lagoon?

    by revenge_of_fett

    First Chris Columbus was going to direct it, then Jim Cameron, then John Carpenter, then Guillermo Del Toro. Where does the film stand right now? Will it ever happen?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 10:39:27 AM CDT

    Cast

    by melvin_pelvis

    Vanessa Hudgens as the Bride, Zac Efron as Doctor Frankenstein and Miley Cyrus as Frankensteins Creature

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 10:45:37 AM CDT

    No interest

    by arteska

    They'd have to be a lot more creative with selecting the people involved to move the needle with this sort of thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 11:21:54 AM CDT

    Just got done reading the book Frankenstein.

    by hobocode

    nothing like any adaptation of it. It was much better.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 11:23:42 AM CDT

    You CUNTS!

    by charlie & tex

    There are some movies that should have the equivalent of preservation orders slapped on them, and Bride of Frankenstein is a prime example. Hope it turns out to be a load of old wank.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 12:00:21 PM CDT

    Correction, THE SERIOUSLY UNDERRATED ILLUSIONIST

    by kateowyn

    You don't need a genre background to make a great fucking movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 12:00:47 PM CDT

    I vote, "why not?"

    by royston lodge

    Take a great concept, give it a good director, good writers, and WAY better make-up than the original. You got yourself a damned good movie.
    To answer the question, "why?". Because the bride looked really stupid in the original, and her silliness really distracts from the coolness of the movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 12:17:07 PM CDT

    Wait...

    by anna valerious

    Wasn't Alphaville, the production company behind the GOOD Mummy films, going to make this about 10 years ago?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 12:26:17 PM CDT

    The Illusionist was AMAZING and better than Prestige!

    by proman1984

    Talented fucking director!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 12:32:53 PM CDT

    We've already seen a modern remake in

    by sith witch

    Kenneth Branagh's Frankenstein adaptation. The whole concept of a mate for the creature was beautifully executed into what is already a very haunting, faithful, and wonderful adpatation of the novel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 12:33:14 PM CDT

    CREATURE Remake, Burger, Etc.

    by mrbeaks

    Breck Eisner was attached to the CREATURE remake for a year or so, but he recently left the project. The script by Gary Ross is good enough to go into production; they just need to find another director (hopefully one a little bit better than Eisner).I think Neil Burger is a talented filmmaker. I'm just being tough on him because this, to me, is like remaking THE GODFATHER. Whale's BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN is iconic. And if you're going to take it on, you'd better have something interesting to say. This is why I believe you should stay the fuck away from period: setting this in the same era would immediately feel like you're copying-and-pasting the original. Obviously, I'm not hoping for Zac Efron "rebooting" his dead sweetheart with an iPhone or whatever someone suggested above - and I doubt Brian Grazer would force such changes on Burger. I just think that anything you can do to get away from the iconography of Whale's movie would be incredibly helpful. Finally, the weird thing about remaking BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN is that it's basically a riff on unused elements from Shelley's story. So Burger will be doing a riff on riff. It's just weird. But I wish him the best of luck.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 12:46:35 PM CDT

    I'm gonna start taking note of how many remake...

    by mode_7

    ... announcements I see on this site compared to original properties. I swear it must be over 50%.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 1:02:06 PM CDT

    So they're basically rebooting Frankenstein BUT...

    by mrhazard

    starting with Bride??? Huh???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 1:03:10 PM CDT

    Just dont remake Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein...

    by mrhazard

  • Jun 17, 2009 1:08:09 PM CDT

    Abbot and Costello Meets Frankenstein

    by themoviesyoulikesuckass

    Greatest movie ever made.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 1:10:12 PM CDT

    They already did this..

    by nolan bautista

    ..it was called "Weird Science"..shes alive!!..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 1:17:21 PM CDT

    Need a Frankenstein before a Bride

    by rgc123

    Mike_D is right. Kinda need to put Frankenstein back out there before going into the whole Bride thing. Speaking of "The Bride", Jennifer Beals was hot....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 1:32:20 PM CDT

    The only way I could see this working....

    by mathom

    Is if instead of a remake, it just utilizes the title is set in modern times, and even references the original movie as an inspiration for some Reanimator type activities in some dudes garage.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 1:34:12 PM CDT

    "The Gay Bride of Frankenstein"

    by snake foreskin

    Set it in San Francisco. Or Iowa. Cast Sean Penn and Danny Glover. Your choice who is who. Or Anderson Cooper and Keith Olbermann. Make sure Olbermann is the monster's bride, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • And Helena Bonham Carter to play the Bride, reprising her role in Terminator-Salvation.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 4:48:25 PM CDT

    Save money on the makeup budget

    by thebloop

    Cast Ellen Degeneres as the Bride. Have you ever seen that mug in HD? Yikes! Plus, when the monster is presented with his Bride, she could say "no thanks, I don't drive stick", to which the monster would reply "ARRGG,Dyke bad!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 5:19:59 PM CDT

    Wrong...

    by fettster_uk

    I don't usually diss films this early in the the process but this just feels wrong...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 5:21:43 PM CDT

    added to my boycott list

    by frank cotton

    will be watching BRIDE OF REANIMATOR (unrated, of course) instead

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 6:29:54 PM CDT

    STOP THIS SHIT NOW!!!

    by th3480

    They remake the greatest American horror film ever made, and I will fucking kill a baby.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 7:28:14 PM CDT

    Tim Burton would be good for the BRIDE remake

    by alfie boy

    After all, what was Edward Scissorhands but a retelling of Frankenstein?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 9:41:52 PM CDT

    The reason they are remaking this is

    by jparso3

    because of the gay F**cking twilight club.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 17, 2009 10:24:08 PM CDT

    MAKE IT MODERN!!!

    by gabbo_the_great

    With i pods and apple phones and crap. omg lol

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 18, 2009 8:31:35 AM CDT

    what the fuck is a burgermaster any way?

    by thefunkyenigma

  • Jun 18, 2009 10:17:02 AM CDT

    Universal horror

    by vlad the inhaler

    Instead of remaking BRIDE, how about an all-new monster to join the ranks of Frankenstein, the Wolf Man, Dracula, the Mummy, etc.? Some anthropomorphic, shambling creature with a signature "look," and PG-13 scariness? Done in the tradition of Universal Studios horror films? That would be a lot more fun and imaginative, rather than a pointless remake that everybody will have their knives out for.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 18, 2009 11:47:44 AM CDT

    Starring Nancy Pelosi as the Bride

    by feralangel

    And Barack Obama as Blackula. He'll charm you with his pretty words and then suck your wallet and your kids' financial futures dry in order to give their life's blood to deadbeats. Now THAT'S a horror film!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 18, 2009 11:48:45 AM CDT

    Abbott and Costello meet Frankenstein

    by feralangel

    Indeed, a comedy classic. "Hold That Ghost" is pretty damn good too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 18, 2009 12:36:24 PM CDT

    remake curse of the queerwolf

    by gabbo_the_great

  • Jun 18, 2009 1:57:12 PM CDT

    Yeah! Fuck originality!

    by kolchak

    I'm so tired of that shit anyway.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback