Logo

Cool News

Jinkies! The Latest on '77 (formerly 5-25-77)!!!

Published at:  May 25, 2009 11:47:50 PM CDT

Hey folks, Harry here... A long time ago, I screened a movie called 5-25-77 at the Alamo Drafthouse. The film was still in rough shape - in terms of visual effects, sound, editing, etc. But director Patrick Read Johnson really really needed the help of the audience he was making the film for. Geeks.

He'd been editing on the film for quite some time. And at that juncture it was very much two different movies. One, was a bit goofy. The other was seriously great. But at that point, Patrick wasn't confident in that "great" story - because frankly... it was his life, the drama of it, the memories. Was he just being self-absorbed? Well, yeah... but that's kind of the point of shooting an auto-biography cinematically. And the only great Auto-Biographies are those that have the courage to be honest.

Patrick went back in on the film, took it to the Hamptons and came away with one of the top awards! He learned more from that screening - and that's where I lost touch with Patrick - till I got sent this link: STARLOG's story on '77

And it made me smile. Of course this story is at STARLOG, Patrick - like many of us, grew up with Starlog monthly. I used to get mine at a 7-11 3 blocks from my childhood home - and when Patrick and I chat - we often talk about old rumors and newsbits of abandoned legendary projects that existed and then didn't - that we read about and dreamt about due to the wonders of STARLOG!

You should definitely check that story out! And you can bet, that until it is released - we'll continue to cover and keep you up to date with '77!



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • May 25, 2009 11:51:33 PM CDT

    First?

    by one9deuce

    This movie is taking it's sweet time coming out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 25, 2009 11:54:13 PM CDT

    Is this post actually from 1999?

    by woemcats

    Because I think that's when I first read about this movie. The cast has probably forgotten they were ever in it by now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:04:57 AM CDT

    Would've made a good double feature "Grindhouse" style with Fanb

    by angry mike

    except Grindhouse sucked.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:05:25 AM CDT

    Uh, that was double feature with Fanboys.

    by angry mike

  • May 26, 2009 12:05:58 AM CDT

    Looks like Fanboys with a lower budget

    by robzass

    ...if thats even possible. IMDB it. the lead actor looks half retarded.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:11:11 AM CDT

    That "24 fps" line was painfully awkward.

    by flim springfield

  • May 26, 2009 12:13:37 AM CDT

    Sorry but Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back owns this

    by rubiks doob

    Being a Star Wars geek is one thing, spinning an interesting, watchable movie around that geekdom is something else entirely.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:15:36 AM CDT

    Angus ruled!

    by landosystem

    He needs to finish this movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:32:06 AM CDT

    one9douche

    by daremo

    Yep! You were first! Welcome to the "First" posters douche bag club!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:44:27 AM CDT

    ONE OF THE RARE DAYS IN WHICH AICN EARNS ITS NAME

    by the_man_behind_the_curtain

    You should stick to this kind of stuff Head Geek, instead of shit like Script Girl or what you saw on Youtube yesterday.Cool news = interesting news.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:45:40 AM CDT

    It can't be any worse than Fanboys.

    by immorganfreeman

    I'm sorry, but the movie was ultimately a mess, and very disappointing. One of the few times I disagreed with an AIC recommendation.

    I have hopes for this '77, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:52:38 AM CDT

    Get a life!

    by iron-kong

    You took an enjoyable little movie from the 70's and turned it into a colossal waste of time!! You! Ever kiss a girl? No seriously, get a life.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:08:53 AM CDT

    No AVATAR = no interest.

    by motoko kusanagi

    James Cameron will totally fucking destruct cinemas in December.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:24:14 AM CDT

    Actually Daremo

    by one9deuce

    I'm a multiple member of the "first" club and actually had business cards printed up to show to women.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:25:08 AM CDT

    Looking forward to it...

    by bones

    I have been waiting for this film for a decade now--I can wait a little longer...
    This and MOON are the two low-budget films I am really looking forward to this year.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:27:42 AM CDT

    Did Fanboys

    by series 7

    Ever even come out yet? Whats the deal with that?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:29:11 AM CDT

    Agreed on MOON, Bones

    by the_man_behind_the_curtain

    Sam Rockwell deserves some of the wierd devotion Bale gets from a majority of the talkbackers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:30:00 AM CDT

    Series 7

    by the_man_behind_the_curtain

    Master the art of the torrent, my son, and it shall be seen to you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:33:01 AM CDT

    This is what it is all about!

    by geofruben

    The trailer for this film speaks to my soul. Maybe not for everyone... a bit unpolished maybe...but I can't wait to see it. It's what indy filmaking is all about. I love the Terminators and the Transformers... but this kinda stuff is from the heart.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:51:34 AM CDT

    Fanboys

    by series 7

    Yeah I know its out on DVD and all. Just fucking around. Not like I can't see the 500 banner ads for it on this site.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 2:02:10 AM CDT

    Man behind curtain...Bale is so popular here...

    by davidia

    Due to his rant and people starting to make amusing jokes about it. Of course, all these idiots beat the joke into the ground and still aren't stopping, thinking they're hilarious. Now everyone is in on it. Same type of shit like the "Epic Fail" jargon going around. The internet only inflates more sheeple behavior.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 2:12:14 AM CDT

    Just release the damn thing already!!!

    by gabba-uk

    This thing is becoming the Duke Nuke'em Forever of the movie world!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 2:26:54 AM CDT

    Looks better than Fanboys

    by mutilator

  • May 26, 2009 2:29:44 AM CDT

    BALE OWNS YOUR ASS!

    by mr spork

    and the rent's due, motherfuckers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 2:30:14 AM CDT

    get out of the past...

    by hateuall

    no one cares, douche bags. and i was there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 2:47:06 AM CDT

    Don't you mean '25.5.77'?

    by biggusdickus

    Why you Yanks have to fuck your dates around when the entire rest of the planet goes smallest to largest (date, month, year) utterly escapes me.Perverse ex-Colonials...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 3:02:43 AM CDT

    BiggusDickus

    by mr spork

    Because when we speak the date, that's how we say it. The month first, the day second, as in May 26, 2009. So we write it 5-26-09.


    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 4:12:21 AM CDT

    Damn you McG

    by --- emperor ---

    Damn you to hell!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 7:00:11 AM CDT

    I remember using a quote from this for my AOL profile...

    by d.vader

    Back in high school. Seriously, has it been 10 years and this movie has still yet to see the light of day?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 7:41:45 AM CDT

    the trailer looks insufferable

    by rupee88

    just plain bad

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 7:48:55 AM CDT

    J&SB is uwatchable crap.

    by zardozap2005

    Seriously, I picked up Jay & Silent Bob in the $1.99 bin at my grocery store after enjoying Clerks so much. After 10 minutes I was like WTF is this flaming asshole of a film. After 20 I was barely paying attention. Two minutes later I threw it in the trash and put on a better movie. J&SB was shit on top of shit piled on top of a hamburger bun, and served with a side of Suck ASS. And that's about as kind as I can be to J&SB. This movie looks light years better, plus it has the original nerd from Freaks & Geeks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 7:51:07 AM CDT

    Wasn't this filmed, like, 8 years ago?

    by ricarleite2

    It was one of the first stories I remember from AICN...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:01:28 AM CDT

    After the runaway smash that was Fanboys, this is surefire hit!

    by rev_skarekroe

    Star Wars nerd nostalgia films are what the public wants!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:18:25 AM CDT

    Is there a scene...

    by arteska

    with people bitching about the movie and all other movies vehemently over campfires, walkie talkies and CB radios?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:20:57 AM CDT

    In '77, STAR WARS Wasn't For Geeks...

    by buzz maverik

    It was main stream. It became a geek thing between 1983 and 1999. Honestly, you want to know what seeing STAR WARS was like in '77. Watch the episode of THAT 70's SHOW where Eric and the Boyz go see the movie. They dug it, they were into it, their parents and older siblings and the girls didn't get it, but that was it. They geeked Eric up later which was sort of an anacronism, like long hair and polo shirts on the FONZIE show. But that was pretty much it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:25:36 AM CDT

    Comparing this to Fanboys is like ..............................

    by the outlander

    comparing Star Wars Episodes IV V & VI to Star Wars Episodes I II & III.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:32:17 AM CDT

    Hey Biggus Dickus

    by god's brother

    Do you actually go around verbally telling people that it's "The 25th of May" or the "4th of July"? Or do you say "It's May 25th" and "It's July 4th"? Just curious, you fascist...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:52:50 AM CDT

    I remember hearing about movie on Attack Of The Show...

    by the amazing g

    in like 2005, but apparently it's been around much longer than even that, looks awesome though

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:53:24 AM CDT

    *this

    by the amazing g

    also Arteska, you're post makes me laugh

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:53:53 AM CDT

    *your

    by the amazing g

    DAMMIT! I need to go to bed

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:58:03 AM CDT

    Gary Kurtz and Fred Roos producing? I'm sold.

    by yackbacker

    Seriously, those two are fucking professionals. Fuck FANBOYS.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:00:12 AM CDT

    If '77 is the year geekdom triumphed, then '99 is the year

    by yackbacker

    Geekdom was dealt a death-blow. Why do you build me up, Jar-Jar baby just to bring me down?!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:03:19 AM CDT

    Starlog?

    by skoolbus

    Anybody remember when Starlog said that SYBIL DANNING was going to be in "Star Wars IV"? This was after Return Of The Jedi came out. Starlog sucks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:10:27 AM CDT

    God's Brother

    by pandas-r-us

    Not that I think there's a right or wrong way to write the date, but just for info, I can't speak for Biggus Dickus but certainly where I live in the UK people really do say "The 25th of May" and "The Fourth of July". Mostly anyway. I was under the impression you guys did too, at least for that last one, as in "Born on the Fourth of July" etc.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:16:46 AM CDT

    i don't know

    by theexterminator

    what any of this means

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:38:09 AM CDT

    it sounds so regal

    by god's brother

    to say the date first! But here's the problem... If a time-traveller came up to you and was all, "Quick! What is today's date??" you'd be all, "Well, my good sir, today is the 25th day of the fifth month of the year of our lord 2009." But you wouldn't even make it through that sentence before the time police come through the portal and laser his ass. Whereas if you immediately said "MAY 25" then he might have been able to hit the switch on his time portal thing and zap on out to another point in time before getting his ass lasered by the time police. Just sayin'

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:39:18 AM CDT

    so it's an efficiency thing, I guess...

    by god's brother

    I wonder how the Germans say it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:47:54 AM CDT

    Bloody Brilliant, Niche, and Raw

    by hyphenatedwords

    I feel like the writer of that Starlog article, without the direct attachment to the project. '77 has appeared on the radar screen for all of us a few times over the past several years, and each time I've been excited about it, and then it disappears.


    This article is a great read. The film will appease old school Star Wars fans, but the film and the story of making the film will be inspiring for aspiring filmmakers. I'm allowed a much better connection to that part of the story now because of the experience of knowing my brother and our friend, their challenges and successes in getting their films made. So, I'm thankful for that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:48:10 AM CDT

    In '77, STAR WARS Wasn't For Geeks...I so agree

    by moviegimp

    These kids have no clue what it was like back then. I saw Star Wars that weekend. I was the only thing I wanted for my 11th birthday, to see that movie. I was to young at the time and to isolated to know anything more than the trailers I saw on tv. No one understood why I wanted to see that movie since there hadn't been a sci fi movie for kids in forever. That's right, Star Wars was for kids. Just because everyone else liked it doesn't change that. Then it hit big, not big like you think of today, but bigger than anything you can imagine. On the cover of every magazine, not just movie mags, talked about by everyone, not just geeks or sci fi fans. Those of us who were around at the time can never convey to you and you will never understand how big that movie was and what it meant to modern cinema.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:48:49 AM CDT

    And chock full of one-liners

    by hyphenatedwords

    These are such gems.


    "This wasn't your first time, either! Your first time was when you saw the coming attractions for Star Wars; you had tears in your eyes! How could I ever compete with that?"


    "To everyone else, movies are something you watch when you're tired of real life. To you, real life is something you do when you're tired of watching movies!"


    "Just remember something. Life doesn't move at 24 frames per second. It moves a lot faster."


    "Hollywood might be a door. Might be a wall. I won't know till I touch it."

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:50:49 AM CDT

    How hard would it be to just tell us what this "great story" is?

    by thecontinentalop

    Jesus, Harry, you must be the sloppiest professional writer on earth. Did you not think that telling us what the movie was about might make us more interested in seeking it out? Or was that too much work? Oh well. At least you didn't mention your dick. Good job.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 9:59:10 AM CDT

    Yes, Star Wars had almost universal appeal in '77...

    by rev_skarekroe

    ...but let's not try to pretend that geekdom didn't exist. It did, though it was more literary than it is now, and there were fanzines instead of websites, and conventions were not the grand affairs that they are these days.In fact, though I have no firsthand knowledge (being just a wee lad at the time) I would venture to say that the geeks of '77 were probably LESS into Star Wars than the general public, since it was a populist "space opera" and not the sort of high-concept science-fiction favored by the hardcore nerd set.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:01:10 AM CDT

    Pandas-R-Us

    by rev_skarekroe

    We Yanks say "Fourth of July" because it's a holiday. We use it as a synonym for "Independence Day. For every other day of the year we say the month first.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:09:55 AM CDT

    Harry - the link is dead

    by henryviii

    "Database Error: Unable to connect to the database:Could not connect to MySQL"

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:19:55 AM CDT

    rev_skarekroe

    by pandas-r-us

    Ah, that explains that then.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:26:33 AM CDT

    God's Brother

    by pandas-r-us

    I take your point, the time traveller should probably try to land in the States (assuming his device can move through space as well as time). Having said that, people over here would normally say something like "25th o' May" or more likely "TwennyFiffaMay". Actually if he happened to ask me I'd be more likely to say "Uh, hang on, I remember last Friday was the 22nd. At least I think it was. Ok, what day is it now? Tuesday? Oh yeah, ok so that's 22, 23, 24, 25, 26. It's the 26th of May. Hello? Oh."

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:27:16 AM CDT

    HenryVIII

    by jameszahn

    It's working fine. Had a hiccup for a few minutes. Little bit of a traffic boom on STARLOG.com and FANGORIA.com today...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:36:41 AM CDT

    The freeks and geeks kid's wig ruins it...

    by ringocanplay

    seriously, couldn't they find a better lid or just wait till his hair grew out? It looks like I'm watching a trailer about a cancer patient.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:39:24 AM CDT

    God's Brother called me a Fascist...

    by biggusdickus

    I want that on my tombstone!Back to the argument, here in England we tend to know what the bloody month is most of the time, so when asked we just say 'It's the 25th', or whatever. Date, then month, then year - right? Like the rest of the world does. Then again, what can you expect from a nation that has a 'World Series' for a sport that only it plays...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:40:21 AM CDT

    I guess the lesson is

    by god's brother

    that if you're a time traveller, the first thing you should do is find a newspaper, just like in the movies. I also rarely know the date and have to do the counting-forwards-from-friday thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:42:33 AM CDT

    yeah, but Biggus

    by god's brother

    what about people emerging from comas? They don't necessarily know the month. WHAT THEN???? I do believe that's check and mate

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 10:46:07 AM CDT

    I really wanted to like Fanboys...

    by jacklucas

    But other than a few well placed jokes, the whole flick was just kind of awkward. Sad that the funniest moment was the Kevin Smith and Jay Mewes gag at the roadstop toilet. '77 seems like an actual independant FILM. Not some string of hit or miss (most times miss) jokes made at the expense of Star Wars or Star Trek geeks. It seems like it really has a heart. Hope it finds its distribution soon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 11:21:35 AM CDT

    i need this movie to be released

    by bacci40

    this is my gens movie everytime i see the trailer i tear up and am 16 again

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 11:22:23 AM CDT

    Hey Starlog

    by tin snoman

    what's the status on that Airtight Garage movie you promised me like 15 years ago? Hmm???

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 11:49:28 AM CDT

    "a sport that only it plays"...

    by jackrabbitslim

    Never heard of baseball in Japan... or Dominican Republic... or Venezuela... That "World Series" trope is about as annoyingly ignorant as hearing someone pronounce the Sceptered Island as "Eng-uh-land" And, just for the record, baseball is boring.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 11:52:19 AM CDT

    The World Series, MLB and you...

    by the_beard_of_chuck_norris

    Major League Baseball is in the U.S.A. and also Canada. So that is 2 nations, Biggus.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 11:54:19 AM CDT

    I'd say geekery in 1977 was ham radio operators

    by jackrabbitslim

    But being as i was a wee lad of 8, my viewpoint is a bit skewed. And my perspective of the popularity of Star Wars was it had as much to do with the special effects advances as it did with the story. Then again, as my father was always quick to point out, Star Wars always seemed like an obvious Buck Rogers rip off.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:22:46 PM CDT

    I liked Fanboys just fine

    by slone13

    I didn't go in expecting any sort of cinematic masterpiece, though.

    Same for Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:38:46 PM CDT

    Seeing the original SW must have been a transformative experienc

    by fa_tass_dinomolester

    Who knew Lucas would eventually turn into a gibbering pile of money-worshiping Bantha poodoo? What's ironic is in the original trilogy, he is Luke; in the prequels, he's Nute Gunray, and doesn't even realize it, considering the treatment of that particular character...wonder if there's some subconscious self-loathing, there? Probably not, the big-necked bitch doesn't seem that self aware. And personally, I grew up loving Cinescape...damn, that was a cool magazine. Genre entertainment personified...which of course, was killed by the likes of websites such as AICN. Fuck you, Harry, you creepy crap!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:46:55 PM CDT

    Very nice preview.

    by clarencebeaks

    Brings back some great memories. Will check this out. Thanks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 12:56:39 PM CDT

    77 Geek was all about Trek

    by ninjachampion

    I agree, no geeks in 77. Star Trek was in syndication and had a large following, Trek cons were still a new thing and there were rumors and talk about a new Trek movie or TV show. The Star Wars geeks were all still little weird kids in elementary school.
    But 77 and Fanboys look like someone else's idea of what a geek is like or what he thinks is funny. This just looks like something I'd be embarrassed to watch with anyone else around.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:26:18 PM CDT

    Biggus is just mad...

    by iron-kong

    because we stuck them with Madonna, and Gwyneth Paltrow. Just watch it Biggus or we'll send Rosie O' Donnel too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:40:37 PM CDT

    No! Not Rosie!

    by biggusdickus

    I'll be good! I'll be good!You can keep Gervais, though...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 1:41:28 PM CDT

    PLUGplugPLUG

    by obeygonzo

    So how much does "the alamo drafthouse" pay for the constant mentions? Or do they just pay you in sandwiches? Seems like you only love the ones that serve you, Harold.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 2:26:36 PM CDT

    Completely and utterly pointless

    by shabbyblue

    With the lack of success for Fanboys, despite the ridiculously long campaign to get it out in theaters, doesn't yet another Star Wars geek movie seem doomed to failure from the start? Just send it straight to DVD and be done with it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 3:36:51 PM CDT

    I saw the rough cut at SWCIV and.....

    by wackybantha

    ....it's a good movie. It is definitely not a star wars geek comedy film like Fanboys. It is a heartwarming dramedy about a small town kid's dream to be a filmmaker. And star wars is his inspiration. It's not about his fanaticism. The trailer is just ok but could be better. It doesn't do the film justice.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 3:53:38 PM CDT

    What it is... And what it isn't...

    by doctorfloyd

    To those that think Star Wars was NOT for geeks back in 1977, you're absolutely right.

    I know... I was there... But there WERE geeks in 1977... Plenty of them... They were just Star Trek geeks, or, in my case, 2001: a space odyssey, Space 1999, and Silent Running geeks.

    But this film isn't really about some geek and his lone quest to see Star Wars the day Star Wars came out. It's actually the TRUE story of a young filmmaker-- a guy Gary Kurtz sometimes refers to as "Fan 1"-- who's trapped in a small town on the edge of the edge of nowhere, in 1977, making goofy little Super-8 epics in his backyard, with props and models and costumes made from things you might find lying around your garage. He's the biggest director in Wadsworth, Illinios-- And the bullied outsider in his local high-school. A naive, sci-fi obsessed, wish-upon-a-star, teenaged dreamer without a chance in hell of ever getting to Hollywood, who, through a series of unlikely but actual events, ended up doing exactly that... in March of 1977. And, thanks to the help of a couple of Hollywood heroes and an old WW2 cameraman turned editor of American Cinematographer magazine, ended up in a homebuilt screening room at a little place in the San Fernando Valley called I.L.M., watching a little unknown film called "STAR WARS" 2 months before anyone else on the planet-- When the film was still in rough cut form... its blue-screens as yet uncomposited... its battle sequences still intercut with WW2 dogfight footage and clips from DAMBUSTERS and 633 SQUADRON... its entirety playing out much like something made in a backyard... with things you might find lying around your garage... yet still utterly amazing. And hugely inspiring.

    But even this watershed event isn't the real point of the film-- Seeing Star Wars is just a catharsis in the film. A fork in the road of a life dedicated to the dream of becoming a filmmaker. A dream that started a decade earlier when the kid first saw 2001 a space odyssey. There are as many nods to the great sci-fi films of the 60's and early 70's in this film as there are references to Star Wars. The movie is ultimately about a boy growing up... preparing to leave home... and facing the sacrifices he has to make to chase a dream beyond the borders of his little town and the limits of his inexperience.

    The film is funny at times but it is NOT a comedy... It's not about Star Wars jokes. And it is not, ultimately, at tribute to Star Wars.

    It's a tribute to being different... taking chances... and never, never, never quitting.

    It's a tribute to a kid I knew 32 years ago. A kid who didn't know things then that I know now... And who wouldn't recognize himself if he saw me today.

    I hope, when it's finally finished, you'll look past easy comparisons and simple preconceptions and give the film a chance.

    For that kid's sake. And, like the narrator in the original Star Wars radio spots once said... "Just for fun"...

    Best regards,

    Patrick Read Johnson

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 4:06:04 PM CDT

    Thanks PRJ!

    by wackybantha

    I can't wait to see the final cut!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 4:41:40 PM CDT

    excuse me...I SHOULD BE "FAN 1"

    by bacci40

    none of my friends knew who lucas was, and thought star wars looked dumb talked them all into standing in line with me for 3 hours at the coronet theater in sf on opening weekend the 6th time i went to see it, i took my then gf....and ignored her the entire time ok, so i didnt become a film maker...so sue me

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 4:46:14 PM CDT

    of course there were geeks in 77

    by bacci40

    anybody hear of a little thing called planet of the apes? in sf and other cities, they held marathons of the entire series famous monsters had a huge circulation marvel comics was just coming back into vogue with xmen there werent star wars geeks, and geek culture had yet to rule the world, but we were there... and my dad is an og geek....dont believe me? ill show all of you his amazing collection of sci fi mags and pulps

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 4:55:08 PM CDT

    Bacci40

    by doctorfloyd

    That's pretty good! I only saw it 28 times in it's first month of release.
    Now CLOSE ENCOUNTERS of the THIRD KIND-- THAT I saw 32 TIMES in it's first month of release!
    Geek? ME?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 5:02:00 PM CDT

    maybe seeing Star Wars wasn't for geeks

    by ufoclub1977

    but when you read the Marvel comic, the novelization (secretly by Alan Dean Foster), bought the little blue star wars sketchbook of Joe Johnston art and had light sabre fights with broom handles in 1977... you were a bit of a geek.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 5:16:19 PM CDT

    He actually gets to have sex with a girl

    by dingbatty

    who isn't ugly while he is in highschool, in the trailer (and I suppose, in reality?) Definately not a geek.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 5:27:06 PM CDT

    Starlog was the shit, back in the day!

    by zardoz

    and now they're back, online? Sweet! I used to buy it at Sydney's newsstand in New Orleans. I remember reading in Starlog about the deleted scenes in Alien in '79 and then having to wait 20 years to see them finally on DVD. Good times!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 5:36:53 PM CDT

    I can't wait for your film Patrick

    by star hump

    I was bit younger than you in those days (10 in '77) but I clearly recall those magical days when Star Wars and Close Encounters were released. True, it all was "just for fun." And what thrilling fun it was. Best of luck on your movie. I'm really looking forward to seeing it. It sounds like an amazing story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 5:59:03 PM CDT

    Whiny geeks at it again!

    by zodnotgod

    I'm sick of the Lucas-haters switching to the brilliance of Kurtz!
    If that fucker had done his job correctly he wouldn't have been fired!
    Where is this flick! I still want it as I saw SW that summer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • 1999 was one helluva year for me. Not sure why so many were disappointed. It didn't define me, but it did give me plenty of thrills that summer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 6:10:37 PM CDT

    Also

    by zodnotgod

    If anyone is embarrassed by their geekiness to anyone else they need to go fuck themselves, hard and often. Love it or leave it, baby.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 6:14:10 PM CDT

    Jesus! Just RELEASE IT ALREADY!!!

    by drath

    I've been seeing trailers for this shit for three damned years! I don't care if it's not fucking perfect, release the mother fucker and make a vanity-driven director's cut a year later like every body else, bitch!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 6:17:08 PM CDT

    Again....

    by zodnotgod

    The only thing I didn't care for in "Fanboys" was the SW vs Trek crap. I grew up loving both; how can you not if you call yourself a respectable geek of any kind. It's big world, no need to choose.
    And if there is anyone out there that does not list "Wrath of Khan" on their favorite movies list of all time, I feel sorry for that poor fucking soul. SUCKS TO THEM!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 6:42:49 PM CDT

    I saw this movie a couple of years ago

    by roguescribner

    And while parts were amusing, overall it wasn't very good. The movie was schizo and rambling. Maybe that's changed now, but it seemed to me at the time more of a love letter to 2001 than Star Wars.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 7:22:44 PM CDT

    This guy just needs to find another line of work.

    by cotton mcknight

    Seriously, I commend his spirit but I have been hearing about this movie for what, 3 years now? Glad to see he took my advice when I told him he movie should NOT be called 5-25-77, though- as I stated at the time, the movie seemed to have little to do with Star Wars and more to do with sci fi in general. He wrote back with an angry rant, as I recall.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 7:27:22 PM CDT

    no subject

    by doctorfloyd

    Really? Seriously? Any movie that takes more than a few years to get from script to screen should just be abandoned? The director should find a new line of work? This isn't an angry rant... It's a truly surprised question. Would anyone here care to make a list for Cotton here of the films he might never have seen if filmmakers gave up on their works after only a couple of years?

    Best,

    PRJ

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 7:30:15 PM CDT

    That having been said...

    by doctorfloyd

    Cotton's right about the film not really being about Star Wars... (see above)

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:09:08 PM CDT

    This story depresses me - please stop talking about it

    by geraldbeans

    This is the kind of thing that depresses the hell out of me. 10 years from production and still no release? And all for a film that's going to be mildly amusing, play at 4 theaters then go straight to video?? Fuck that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 8:26:01 PM CDT

    awesome....the man himself posts in this TB!

    by the amazing g

    I like that.......I wish more filmmakers had the balls to actually post in the talkbacks

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 11:04:57 PM CDT

    When I first saw the trailer for this movie

    by series 7

    I really wanted to see it. Was their any mention of this movie coming to any form of viewing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 26, 2009 11:19:58 PM CDT

    My Story...1977

    by the true pinback

    Back in '77, I was fifteen,and I was a fan...filmgeek wasn't even an imaginary term. I dug Marvel Comics, Doc Savage paperbacks, STAR TREK, PLANET OF THE APES, and Starlog Magazine. In Fairbanks, Alaska, we didn't get STAR WARS until October, so I had quite a few months to prime my self for it. The mopre I saw from it and read about it, the more stoled I became. When the film came to town in October, my folks let me skip school that day to get in line...I was third behind the guy who ran a local bookstore that catered to the sci-fi and fantasy crowd. It was indeed a life changing experience. It was the true epiphany of my life. After watching it for the first time, I knew that somehow I would find a way to get out of Alaska and into filmmaking. Finally, after a tour in the Navy, I went to film school and got a job at a special effects studio in the Spring of 1987...ten long years later. I had a lot of people tell me to "Get a legitimate job with a future" but I listened to my heart. STAR WARS to me is what the Harryhausen pictures are to a lot of other people...an inspiration. Yes, I am still a BIG fan, and I am in no way, shape or form embarrassed about that. I'm 47 years old now, and have a family, but that wide-eyed fifteen year old still dwells in me, and every time I watch STAR WARS I am taken back to that day in October of 1977. I applaud Patrick Read Johnson, and I hope to one day be able to view his film. Here's one talkbacker who will appreciate it! If people want to make fun of STAR WARS and its brethren, that's fine...everyone is entitled to their opinion. But here's a tasty nugget for you all to chew on and savor...if not for STAR WARS and all that followed, it's a good bet that this website and one's similar to it would not exist. Stop your bitching and have some fun for Christ's sake. You'll feel better in the long run. Oh, and by the way, I really enjoyed TERMINATOR SALVATION.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 27, 2009 3:35:03 AM CDT

    But what about 10.21.77?

    by biggusdickus

    (See? I wrote it nicely for you Yanks!)You know, that TRUE defining Sci-fi landmark - 'Damnation Alley'!Laugh? I nearly passed my smokes round...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 27, 2009 6:42:47 AM CDT

    Starlog

    by templar

    Still collect them. Great magazine
    with good articles.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 27, 2009 8:00:11 AM CDT

    Did Fanboys Run Into Bart/Lisa/Cartman...

    by buzz maverik

    ...at Skywalker Ranch? That's what I kept thinking in the previews. The cartoon kids beat them there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 27, 2009 4:44:49 PM CDT

    Hey, Pinback

    by mistermanreturns

    Similar story here - same age, a small town in TN, and ended up in film school, as well. SW was actually a pretty big deal for everybody - not just geeks (which I'm not). My room was covered in SW posters, etc., though, and I saw the film 20 times during the first YEAR of its release. Good times.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 27, 2009 5:45:48 PM CDT

    MisterManReturns...

    by the true pinback

    GOOD TIMES INDEED!!! Going to STAR WARS...and other films...with my friends are some of my fondest memories. I still love going to movies-I'm a bit of a special effects junkie now, though. But movies are stillmy favorite pasttime, hobby, what have you. I'm not as down on things as a lot of people who post here seem to be, because I'm just out for the enjoyment factor. My "life changing experience" happened a long time ago, and I'm not really looking for another. If it happens, so be it, but I don't go to movies expecting it. If it's meant to be, then it will occur, I guess. Until then, I'll keep frequenting the theaters and buying DVD's...it's one helluva passion, I'll say that!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 27, 2009 9:26:36 PM CDT

    NEEDS GIANT ROBOTS

    by sal_bando

    Well maybe?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 27, 2009 11:43:41 PM CDT

    Giant Robots

    by doctorfloyd

    You know... I will actually consider adding Giant Robots to this film. I love me some Giant Robots...

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback