… NBC might have at least encouraged the folks behind this pulp-novel transfer to do something, anything, we haven't seen before, if only to throw us off the Da Vinci/National Treasure trail. … done in by being both too late and too long. At two hours it might have worked (see TNT's Librarian films). But you can't stretch a story this thin and absurd over two nights, especially when it's slow to start and slower to finish. You're just giving us too much time to consider what we've seen last and predict what we'll see next. …The New York Times says:
… possesses the true Halmi signature: despite the fact that it’s packed like a sausage with banter and jokes both verbal and visual, it doesn’t contain a single genuinely funny moment. …The Los Angeles Times says:
… Once you start mucking about with the Grail or anything remotely connected to the actual life of the man called Jesus, you can get into choppy waters. And unfortunately those waters swamp "The Last Templar." The action is too sword-and-sandal, the relationship between Tess and Daley far too adorably argumentative for the writers (Khoury and Suzette Couture) to decide, at the relatively last minute, to make "The Last Templar" a sanctimonious treatise on the nature of Christ and the importance of religious faith. …The Washington Post says:
… a hackneyed, muddled mess that so wants to be "The Da Vinci Code" or "National Treasure" or any of the Indiana Jones movies and fails spectacularly all the way around. …The Boston Globe says:
… a four-hour exercise in generic nonsense that wants to remind us of "The Da Vinci Code," when it's not mimicking "Romancing the Stone." But watching Sorvino and trying to reconcile her presence in this genre is perversely stimulating and, when her character, Tess, breaks a pair of Manolo Blahniks in a chase scene, curiously entertaining. Alas, the writers never give Sorvino a handy action-hero catchphrase; that would have been the cherry on this kooky sundae. … With two hours of air sucked out of it, the story - which also flashes back to medieval times - might have been fast-paced enough to distract us from all the plot glitches. But at four hours, you are left with far too much time to ponder the feebleness of the endeavor. …Variety says:
… a mess of biblical proportions … Sitting through both nights will qualify not just as an act of faith but one that may approach self-flagellation. … Early on it's pretty clear the four hours won't contain a single original thought, down to gauzy flashbacks of the 13th century knights and dialogue that dictates that when Tess exclaims "Rats!," sure enough, her feet are surrounded by them.The Hollywood Reporter says:
… after about an hour of jumbled storytelling and bizarre juxtapositions between the 13th century Latin Kingdom and 21st century New York, the prediction is you'll be less intrigued by the legend of the medieval Knights Templar than you will the prospect of catching up on your reading. …
This season, it's viewers who have been left stranded. Nowhere is that more true than at NBC, which, pound for pound, has produced the worst new fall slate since those heady days of Manimal and Mr. Smith. Only in a year in which the network has already given us Knight Rider, Kath & Kim and My Own Worst Enemy could Crusoe be said to exceed expectations. It's bad, but it's not that bad. … considering the talent involved and the money spent, it's best to ratchet back your comparison points to syndicated fantasies like Hercules. … you may find yourself tiring of plot holes you can steer a galleon through and the second-rate nature of much of the cast, and wondering how you make a series out of two people trapped on a deserted island. Which is why the big question isn't how Crusoe gets off this island, but whether you'll come back. …The New York Times says:
… Crusoe jovially makes Friday promise he’ll stay away from that silly cannibalism. The two are Crockett and Tubbs. There would be no crime in any of this if “Crusoe” didn’t feel like such a drag. “Lost” requires a vague familiarity with names that turn up on the syllabus for an introductory political theory class, but “Crusoe” just demands caffeine. It sedates, and its fabricated sentimentality does not save it. …The Los Angeles Times says:
… Some of what happens happens just to make things colorful or keep them moving. … demanding absolute sense or ironclad consistency from a show like this is like wanting a butterfly to fly a straighter line, not only pointless but somehow unnatural. … The plot is . . . just a plot. …The Chicago Tribune says:
… Anyone older than 10 will likely cringe at the way "Crusoe" liberally borrows from both "Lost" and "Gilligan's Island," and wonder why, exactly, it is necessary for Robinson Crusoe to remove his shirt for long periods of time. As Crusoe, Philip Winchester manages to hold on to a couple of shreds of dignity despite the script's creakier aspects. …The Washington Post says:
… For all its shortcomings and flat flourishes, "Crusoe" has one very significant thing going for it, a virtue that can be summarized in four reassuring words: At Least It's Different. …The San Francisco Chronicle says:
… The real trouble with "Crusoe," which is less an adaptation than a way to use elements of "Pirates of the Caribbean" and "Lost," is that it's so clumsy. Hokey and poorly paced with unfathomably lame flashbacks, it's like a relentlessly mediocre movie of the week that still has 11 more hours to go. …The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette says:
… a bit of a wreck itself. … bloated … The tone varies wildly from action-adventure to serious costume drama. …The Fort Worth Star-Telegram says:
… it accomplishes a pretty astonishing feat: It manages to water down Defoe’s novel and the things it directly or indirectly inspired — Cast Away, Survivor, Lost — all at once, and the two-hour premiere manages to dilute Pirates of the Caribbean as well. …Variety says:
… really a throwback to the cheerfully silly first-run syndicated hours ("Sinbad!" "Sheena!" "Conan!") … a respectable effort -- handsomely shot and offering old-fashioned end-of-the-week escapism … In a larger sense, "Crusoe" reflects the inconsistency in NBC's development approach this season, inasmuch as the show wants to be light, frothy family fun, while garnishing that with a nasty streak doubtless deemed necessary to satisfy today's jaded youth. …The Hollywood Reporter says:
… champions swashbuckling and scenery without grasping the significance of credibility and character development. … Frequent flashbacks piece together the story of how Crusoe got into this mess. Presumably, all the dots won't be connected until the 13th and final part of the series. Meanwhile, they are mostly speed bumps in this story of a brave but terribly bland marooned mariner.