Logo

Cool News

AICN Dedicated Talkback: Here Comes WOLVERINE!!

Published at:  Apr 30, 2009 8:59:16 PM CDT

SPOILER ALERT !!


Merrick here...


Tonight at midnight, theaters near and far will begin screening X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE for the public en masse.

Did Gavin Hood, the Donners, Jackman, etc. make it worth our wait? Did they botch it completely? Or, is reality somewhere in between?

Feel free to register your love, disdain, indifference, and more for WOLVERINE in the Talkback below. We'll try to keep this Talkback visible on AICN's main page throughout the weekend - so be sure to check in from time to time to see what the world is saying. And, of course, you should throw your own thoughts into the mix as well!

Needless to say, there will be spoilers below, so consider yourself forewarned...

Have fun!











    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:52:44 PM CDT

    First?

    by cymbalta4thedevil

    Who Cares

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:53:42 PM CDT

    Why no Wolverine reviews yet?

    by anakinsdiapers

    Newsarama, several other comic sites, and even Ebert has a review. What's going on?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:54:02 PM CDT

    Roger Ebert's Review

    by cymbalta4thedevil

    is Hilariously Dismissive. Still going to see it, if only for the Trainwreck Factor.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:54:48 PM CDT

    i hope this will be good

    by krlotes

    Saludos from México

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:56:25 PM CDT

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.......

    by flickapoo

    ...that's what I said. Haven't said it before and probably won't say it again either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:56:54 PM CDT

    Wait what?

    by snapcase

    People are paying to see this shit? Downloaded the MF and hated it. Wont be seeing it in the theater.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:58:02 PM CDT

    1st IRON MAN 2 pic

    by crestfallen

    First pic showing the Hall of Armor from the sequel: http://tinyurl.com/d5tfsd

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:58:20 PM CDT

    If you think this movie is going to suck...

    by tolomey

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:24 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:26 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:26 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:27 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:28 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:30 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:33 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:35 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:36 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 8:59:37 PM CDT

    better talk at www.NukeTheFridge.COM

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:00:26 PM CDT

    i liked it

    by indyabbey jones

    sue me but i liked it, i hope they make a sequel and more orgins movies..how about one about nightcrawler...also, lets get an x4, or maybe a movies about iceman vs pyro set after last stand?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:00:45 PM CDT

    meh

    by maclovin

    Saw it in Australia last night (we opened on Wednesday)... It's on par with the rest of the X-Men films, which is still pretty good. But it definitely didn't blow my mind with amazingness like the first time I saw Iron Man...

    I saw Star Trek at an advanced screening last week, which is still my pick for Summer (Winter in Aus) Blockbuster of the year so far. It's fucking amazing! Bring on the next one!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:02:07 PM CDT

    or www.aintitbalenews.com

    by danguy54321

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:09:17 PM CDT

    If you think this movie is going to suck...

    by tolomey

    then please, please don't go to the theatre to watch it anyway for the "trainwreck factor".
    That will only boost the films takings and enbolden Fox to create more bastardizations of our comic book heroes.
    I've seen the movie (I work at a cinema) and it is terrible. The way in which Deadpool is portrayed is nothing but a single giant middle finger from Rothman et all. Deadpool is, was and always shall be, "the merc with a mouth".
    Not, and I repeat not, "the merc with his mouth sewn shut for no apparent reason."
    I felt insulted and I'm not really even a Deadpool fan.
    At the end of the day, it's your choice what to spend your money on, but I'm sure that there are better things than this awful dreck.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:11:38 PM CDT

    I really want AICN reviews.

    by hallmitchell

    I trust those above all else.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:11:39 PM CDT

    Fuck off, Danguy

    by optimuscrime

    I actually GO to nukethefridge, but this TB spamming has got to stop. Everyone here can fucking read, and your message is sent the first time. Your posts should be deleted, and you should be banned.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:12:03 PM CDT

    Yawn

    by ganymede3010

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:13:26 PM CDT

    People even laughed at the red carpet premiere on Tuesday.

    by speed fricassee

    I mean, this thing is catwoman bad. It's fuckin' BLADE: TRINITY bad!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:13:49 PM CDT

    No Thanks

    by biffs_pleasure_paradise

    I plan on watching my dog take a shit all weekend instead.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:15:33 PM CDT

    Not watching this movie

    by mr slippy fist

    When the Fallen's giant moose cock will be fucking our eyeballs out in 2009!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:15:52 PM CDT

    Hahaha

    by my_blue_penis

    Ok, so is this movie just NOT WORTHY of AICN reviews? Or do they just expect us to have all seen workprint already?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:16:37 PM CDT

    Opened in Australia yesterday

    by paulseta

    and the word is out. And that word is that it's the same frickin movie as the download, just with "finished" fx and sound mix.
    That was the big secret - that this WAS the reshot version. In other words, imagine how astonishingly bad the original version must have been.
    Rothman is to moviemaking as AIDS is to porking.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:17:04 PM CDT

    FIRST?

    by lockesbrokenleg

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:17:11 PM CDT

    Needs more Bale.....

    by trannyformers_apologist

    You could really trash the lights with those claws. Fucken A!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:17:26 PM CDT

    in a word...

    by raised fist

    fail.
    Too many characters... cheesy effects. VERY loose interpretation of the comic characters many of us are used to.
    It had its moments... but too many times the potential for something really awesome was there, but no delivery.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:17:42 PM CDT

    Boxing wolverine

    by ellms

    It was preeeeety bullshit, i mean why the fuck did he box the fucking blob when he has indestructible claws? COMEDY GOLD! That why!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:18:33 PM CDT

    Mallrats..

    by vonthunderballs

    was better

    Reply to Talkback

  • ... and that means the way around breaking whatever deal they have is to let the talkbackers do the eviceration for them...
    Fox desparately tried to keep a lid on the fact that the download IS the final version, more or less, and that the film is very very unfriendly to the geek crowd: i.e. people who read this site.
    They're hoping against hope that they get a good opening weekend (or even opening NIGHT) as that's where the majority of the upfront cash flow will come from.
    Even Jackman had that look of desparation on his face when he was flogging this one in Australia recently...
    Getting into bed with Rothman and Fox these days is almost as bad as Harvey Scissorhands era Miramax. Almost.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:21:29 PM CDT

    Nice to meet Hugh!

    by lockesbrokenleg

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:21:59 PM CDT

    Hugh Jackman RAPED MY CHILDHOOD

    by elbmirb

    Someone had to say it. Oh and whoever cast Taylor Kitcsh as Gambit deserves to be reamed in prison.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:22:46 PM CDT

    Origins is at 37% on Rotten Tomatoes and dropping by the minute!

    by ganymede3010

    What fucking disaster.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:24:32 PM CDT

    Paulseta, the workprint was the re-shoot?

    by ganymede3010

    Holy fucking christ! I've never felt this cheated since the TPM. How sad. Brian Singer please come back and save this franchise please.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:24:35 PM CDT

    Worst X-film yet

    by gwai lo

    By a large margin. It's Elektra bad. Worse, maybe, when you take into account how much more potential a Hugh Jackman Wolverine film has over a Jennifer Garner Elektra film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:24:38 PM CDT

    Fuck this movie and all its multiple endings!!!

    by six demon bag

    another insult to the filmgoer...people wait a week for a real film

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:27:23 PM CDT

    The movie is Highlander 2 meets X3.

    by robstar

    That being said...at least there is a lot of action. Something that comic movies seem to be lacking.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:27:50 PM CDT

    They Blew It

    by a-cod

    If they like the character Cyclops so much that they wanted to show him in the prequel, maybe they shouldn't have killed him. Memo to Fox:
    What fans want to see - adult Cyclops alive and "Zarking" people. What we don't want to see - a teenage Cyclops running. Fox should run a full page add in Variety apologizing to X fans.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:29:45 PM CDT

    SHILLING A SUCTACULAR MOVIE

    by zargotron

    Would you expect anything less:

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:30:22 PM CDT

    Special Effects Do Not a Good Movie Make

    by shelleybear

    This film is not a disaster per se, but I wouldn't waste my money on it.
    Sorry folks.
    Better luck next time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:30:37 PM CDT

    don't be trashin'

    by frank cotton

    BLADE TRINITY

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:30:41 PM CDT

    Nuke The Fridge.com

    by a-cod

    I actually just checked out the site despite the troll on the boards here. It sucks, just stories cut and pasted from here, chud and Hitfix.

    No thanks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:32:23 PM CDT

    It's no X2, but it's no Superman Returns either.

    by rippergiles

    I saw it last night at a special screening and can say it's not great. It's not vomiting on dog crap bad, but it's on par with Spider-Man 3. I say this knowing nothing really deep about any of the characters aside from Wolverine, Sabertooth, Cyclops, and Emma Frost. Yes, I know characters are involved that aren't being done according to canon (between X-Men and Star Trek, I'm growing as weary of the word 'canon' as I am of 'antepentultimate'). But I found it a decent two hour diversion. You're not going to get Citizen Kane or Casablanca out of a comic book movie. Can they be made better? Sure as shit they can. They can also be made worse. Ang Lee's Hulk. Nick Fury: Agent of SHIELD. Granted, I think it's ignorant and cheap, along the lines of "X-Men 3" to fuck with the origins of some of these characters, but this is a better film than that. At times, it's what I wanted a Wolverine stand-alone to be: Logan trying to make a peaceful living for himself, but every time he gets settled, a mutant shows up and screws everything up. I'm not saying see it or don't see it. I'm in no position. I'm not a diehard fan of the books. I'll feel more comfortable telling people whether they should or shouldn't see "Trek" next week, and about addressing what's been rewritten there, than I would be here. Oh, and as I expected, Gambit was a pain in the ass. But at least you can kinda see Emma Frost's diamond-hard nips through her wifebeater in a shot. NICE.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:32:32 PM CDT

    this movie looks giant twinkie bad

    by steve_guttenbergs_dick_icecream

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:32:53 PM CDT

    Shoulda put him in a TuTu

    by melvin_pelvis

    he's got the legs for it

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:32:59 PM CDT

    such H8!

    by bluehawaiisurfer

    :o| Wowzers

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:33:52 PM CDT

    PLEASE BAN THE SHILLS FOR NUKETHEFRIDGE.COM!

    by i am the terminator

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:33:52 PM CDT

    listen to one of the only positive reviews...

    by badmrwonka

    "The first spin-off of the X-Men movies has heart, action and Shakespearean-style tragedy, and uncompromisingly plays for keeps"Shakespeare? srsly?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:33:53 PM CDT

    Go see Matt McC's movie with your ladies fellas

    by six demon bag

    not enough to NOT see wolverine, but you have to see something else, anything else...fuck it up...go see OBSESSED. Make it 2 weeks on top.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:34:44 PM CDT

    Im leaving in 20 minutes.

    by cossack_says_die

    Even though I already saw this flaming piece of shit, my faggot friends don't trust me and still want to see it. One guy offered to buy my ticket if I went. So heres to hoping that it doesn't suck as much I as it did before.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:34:51 PM CDT

    PLEASE BAN THE SHILLS FOR AINTITBALENEWS.COM!

    by i am the terminator

    NOW!!TALKBACK AIN'T FOR SHILLING!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:35:09 PM CDT

    Fuck Wolverine

    by ews

    The Celtics just got screwed

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:36:13 PM CDT

    There are a million things wrong with it.

    by gwai lo

    Why does Stryker decide to destroy a man he just finished making even more indestructible than he was before? Why does he think sending Agent Zero, some guy with a gun, after Wolverine will do anything? How come he didn't give Agent Zero adamantium bullets if that's the only thing that could kill Wolverine? How did he know that anyway? What the fuck is the point of using Wolverine's genes to create some multi-powered mutant just to send that mutant back after Wolverine? (who you just made indestructible for no other reason than to try and kill) How does the science behind the Deadpool monstrosity thing work anyway? How does he bend his arms if he has those huge blades in there? How come Wolverine left his sexfriend in the woods to rot? Why didn't he notice she was alive and not wounded? Why are his super-senses broken for half of the movie? Why are Wolverine and Sabretooth in Nam if they're Canadian? Can someone explain why Gambit was in this story and how exactly he had any sort of crucial impact on it? Why is Storm about 5ish if Cyclops is 16ish and Gambit is 25ish? How come these people don't recognize each other when all this prequel has sequeled? Who decided Will.I.Am would be a good idea after the way Nightcrawler was handled in X2? and etc.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:37:15 PM CDT

    anybody leaving their houses to go see WOLVERINE tonight

    by six demon bag

    will not have a home when they get back...BALE commands it

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:40:51 PM CDT

    Fuck Wolverine

    by ews

    Celtics, despite being screwed over take it into OT3

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:41:24 PM CDT

    I thought it was pretty good, but...

    by cruel_kingdom

    the CGI claws looked like shit. That is my only complaint. Liev Schreiber stole every fucking scene he was in, too. In fact, he pretty much stole the whole fucking movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:42:43 PM CDT

    I haven't seen it...

    by kid idioteque

    but I've gotten a very distinct Spider-Man 3 vibe. That said, I'll still check it out this weekend.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:42:48 PM CDT

    Will I.Am was fucking horrible though

    by cruel_kingdom

    Okay, so I have two complaints.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:43:17 PM CDT

    kingdom

    by six demon bag

    whats the point of stealing a shitty movie? SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT. by the way which ending did you see?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:43:19 PM CDT

    EWS

    by my_blue_penis

    They're in triple overtime, sir. The game ain't over yet! Have faith!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:43:56 PM CDT

    I said it before...

    by jedimast3r

    ...and I'll say it again: Jackman is not the definitive Wolvie. Never was, never will be. Too fucking tall, face like a horse, not gruff enough, not tough enough. The majority of it is the bad fucking writing in all 3 X Movies, a franchise that never got its due. Shame. With the bar set so high by The Dark Knight, hopefully we will see comic movie trash get less and less returns, with only quality pieces bringing home the bacon.
    MAYBE then chairy execs will see that how you handle the characters counts and throwing shlop at us will bring less and less money. Maybe.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:44:11 PM CDT

    Antepenultimate Wolverine

    by melvin_pelvis

    yeah, there'll be another one
    just to prove the fans wrong

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:44:14 PM CDT

    Saw it on Tuesday

    by red_weed

    First public screenings started Tuesday in Australia. Can't say it was good. And I'm pissed off that Ryan Renolds's character ended the way he did, he was the best thing about the movie from the start, i wanted to see more of that character.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:44:36 PM CDT

    The movie is TERRIBLE

    by the_scream

    Don't watch it. Don't give Fox your money.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:44:39 PM CDT

    if you do have the misfortune of watching,...

    by six demon bag

    WHICH ENDING DID YOU SEE??? wanna find out how many there are or if this was another FOX lie

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:44:48 PM CDT

    Lame. Conventional. Waste of an opportunity.

    by maxthesilent

    It might as well have been directed by Brett Ratner, because there wasn't a single moment of visual coolness in the whole thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:44:55 PM CDT

    Waiting for Swayne's review

    by miyamoto_musashi

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:45:17 PM CDT

    ganymede3010

    by jimbo_spice

    Brian Singer doesn't give a fuck about you or the franchise. I'm sick of people acting like things would have been better if he had stayed on the trilogy. Wiki the first film and read why he turned down the first one before changing his mind. He thinks comic books are for retards. He half ass directed both films before leaving to half ass direct Superman Returns. Maybe people should actually hope a director who would really care about the fan base would take over.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:45:32 PM CDT

    AICN - how much is Fox paying you

    by miyamoto_musashi

    To not put up your reviews ?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:45:59 PM CDT

    when this movie bombs FOX will blame swine flu

    by six demon bag

    fuckem, wouldnt be surprised if rothman started the whole thing

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:46:55 PM CDT

    EWS

    by knowledge1027

    Great`game

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:50:06 PM CDT

    Knowledge1027

    by ews

    I wish I could watch it :( Stuck off the coast of Africa on a shitty connection waiting for a shitty site to update. It's not good for my health I tell you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:50:22 PM CDT

    Saw Star Trek Instead

    by sam_keith_wannabe

    I'm guessing it was a smart move. Plus it was free. I can't wait not to see this steaming pile of crap.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:51:28 PM CDT

    Ebert and Travers - 2 guys that normally have a clue

    by miyamoto_musashi

    Both reviews pretty telling

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:54:17 PM CDT

    EWS

    by knowledge1027

    Best`game

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:55:30 PM CDT

    I haven't seen the film yet....

    by ksmotorider

    ...or the pirated version, but based just on the trailers I've had doubts.

    For me when I start looking at details like how fake Wolverine's blades look, or how they don't look to be cutting a Hummer but instead just passing through the same point in space then I know the movie doesn't have my attention at level it should.

    Movies based on comics I tend to give physics exceptions to but if you are going to make a movie where you defy physics at least make it believable, or less obvious CGI.

    I know the physics behind Iron Man's suit don't work with the technology of today, but I wasn't thinking that when I watched it.

    I know the Bat Pod popping out of the Bat Mobile would be difficult to have given all the other things the Bat Mobile could do, and the Bat Pod itself couldn't work the way it did, but I wasn't thinking that when I watched TDK.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:57:19 PM CDT

    EWS

    by my_blue_penis

    Yeah, I'm in a similar situation here. I've been on the edge of my seat for about an hour.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:57:47 PM CDT

    the Wolverine musical was hilarious

    by m_reporter

    But X-men Origins: Wolverine was really bad. Not terrible, but just bad. Really bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:58:28 PM CDT

    GIVE UP ROTHMAN

    by wash

    You are shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:59:26 PM CDT

    The only review that matters....

    by otm shank

    is Joshua Swaneys.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 9:59:41 PM CDT

    Despite

    by johnspartan

    Massive missteps, it's not as bad as I expected. There's about an hour of good material here, 30 mins of serviceable, has-nothing-to-do-with-the-comics stuff, but what the hell? And then about 20 of "Are you kidding me?" moments, like Wolvie's two (2!)"MENDOZA!" type screams. Would've been better off focusing on Wolverine vs. Sabretooth the whole time and pruning about 6 characters from the script (memo to Rothman/Donner - just cause you have the rights to use a character and can probably make a bajillion dollars off the action figures does not mean they fit in the story. With great intellectual property rights comes great responsibility). Would have been much better of letting the rights default so Marvel could get control of this material again. While the movie has a great many sins, most of them are no worse than your typical action-movie cliches. The biggest by far is the treatment of Deadpool. The sad part is, actually using the character from the comics could have really worked in this movie. There's real space for an amoral mercenary here. Despite all that, I really didn't feel the complete lack of satisfaction I did from X3. This is a far, far cry from the world Marvel set up in the comics. But for all that, it HALF-works. If only they could get the other half up to snuff.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:01:03 PM CDT

    Peter ravers is a quote whore.

    by m_reporter

    I used to read his stuff, but he gives positive reviews to shitty movies often, only so he can get his name on the cover of a movie poster/dvd.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:01:18 PM CDT

    I may hate you knowledge

    by ews

    I may hate you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:02:16 PM CDT

    KSmotorider

    by gwai lo

    They actually built that Bat Pod and it actually did work almost as well as portrayed in the movie. They didn't even have a problem with getting the cape caught in the tires. It's not a strain on my disbelief to imagine that a billionaire investor would be able to put more R&D into it than a film production, at least to get it up to the type of specs shown.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:05:10 PM CDT

    this magic bullet cant kill him-

    by alice 13

    but it will take away all his memories. = WTF LAME.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:05:55 PM CDT

    Fuck Wolverine

    by ews

    Fuck the refs, fuck the Bulls, fuck everything

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:06:09 PM CDT

    Jackman at AMC RIver East Chicago midnight screening

    by shiftyeyeddog2

    according to his Twitter

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:06:13 PM CDT

    Ews

    by knowledge1027

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:07:02 PM CDT

    Hello ball, you have been dropped.

    by paragoncomplex

    Such a shame. It had potential. Lots. Of. Potential.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:08:48 PM CDT

    The idea of origins movies had merit,

    by ksmotorider

    but I fear studio input and bad direction/editing have made future origins movies a long shot.

    If done well, I could sit and watch an extended look at Magneto and what he experienced in WWII German camps, finding out how he and Professor Xavier met, eventually developed Cerebro, and had a falling out.

    That would be a true back story with one main character, a returning supporting character (who we already know has a history with the lead) and a few previously unseen characters along the way that might tie into part of the X-Men story we've already seen.

    At first I was happy to see a few unseen mutants in the Wolverine movie, then I saw how many and that there were tie ins to Cyclops, Storm and who knows how many others. If the young versions of them have to be put into the film then it isn't standing well on it's own. I could see some cameo by Professor Xavier because we know he knew of Logan before Logan joined the X-Men. I could see having a couple mutants on Logan's side and a couple to fight. I think this film will suffer the same fate as X3; too many new mutants taking up screen time for establishment or are just thrown in to draw fans of those characters into the theater, only to disappoint them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:10:45 PM CDT

    The 2 big questions:

    by miyamoto_musashi

    1. What did Swayne think ?
    2. Did he do the Jennifers or the Heathers ?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:10:55 PM CDT

    Knowledge

    by ews

    If the NBA score updater is to believed, the Celtics twice had a 3 pointer cut to a 2 pointer during critical times. Fuck it all, Bulls will take the final game now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:13:40 PM CDT

    JohnSpartan (re: character rights)

    by mcvamp

    "...just cause you have the rights to use a character and can probably make a bajillion dollars off the action figures does not mean they fit in the story." You're talking to a brick wall, friend. Fox gives no fuck for such things and will squeeze every red cent out of what they paid Marvel for and will readily do things such as X-MEN ORIGINS as long as is legally possible. They'd even hire Roger Corman to slap together a rights-keeper. Just you wait. It'll happen. Probably with Daredevil. Or perhaps a Thing movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:14:35 PM CDT

    NOT THE SHITFEST AINC (HARRY) WAS HOPING IT TO BE....

    by stefan2789

    IT WAS GOOD, NOT GREAT, 7.5 OUT OF 10

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:22:10 PM CDT

    Just don't see it this weekend

    by gwai lo

    See it if you must, but wait until its second week or something. Don't let this do 70+ this weekend or you are essentially giving Fox permission to keep doing this to us. And by us I mean humanity.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:24:41 PM CDT

    If one good thing is to come from this movie

    by tolomey

    it's that Ryan Reynolds would actually make a really cool Deadpool. From the interviews I've seen with him he totally understands the character and in the first part of the film his performance is really good.
    Things get really bad though once Wolverine returns to Stryker's Island (I think that's what it's called) and we see Deadpool as Weapon XI.
    As for the ending (after the credits roll) the version I saw was with Wolverine sitting in a bar in Japan saying that he is "drinking to remember."
    I have heard that there is another ending where Deadpool's severed head (whoose mouth has magically unsealed itself) says "Shhhhhhh."
    Another thing that annoys me is why oh why doesn't Cyclops know who Wolverine is? Ok, so his eyes were covered during the rescue, but are we supposed to think that he didn't ask Professor X or any other of the captured mutants who it was that rescued them from thier cages?
    Even if he wasn't told a name, there must have been someone who said that there was this crazy guy with blades coming out of his hands who saved us.
    It is by no means the worst movie ever made but I personally think that it's on par with Ghost Rider and that is not a good thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:25:35 PM CDT

    Gwai Lo

    by ksmotorider

    Yes, I know they actually built a working Bat Pod. If you have seen the behind the scenes features you would see that the real Bat Pod was powered by a small single cylinder combustion motor. It was able to do most things we saw, but at 700 pounds to achieve the implied speeds and agility in the movie (well done editing) it would take a lot of work to get there. Not saying it can't be done, just that it is hard given that the movie Bat Pod "used" not so off the shelf technology. I'm a motorcycle racer and mechanic by trade so I know a bit about bikes and how they work....now back to the TB about Wolverine.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:27:10 PM CDT

    Yeah, the multiple endings scam

    by fiester

    Smacks of the worst late '90s comics when every new issue have four different covers. Same sort of money grab.

    And apparently the leaked work print is exactly the same movie that is currently being shown in theaters nationwide.

    Way to fuck up a franchise, Fox. You fuckers should stick to making fake news for Republitards.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:27:27 PM CDT

    My eyes! MY GOD! MY EYES!!!!

    by the dum guy

    I've got some bad allergies acting up.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:27:49 PM CDT

    Ryan Reynolds: So what

    by gwai lo

    Like he's the only wise-ass with rippling abdominal muscles in Hollywood. I'm sick of all the hyperbole being thrown at his take on Deadpool. He was Ryan Reynolds with swords, big deal. Maybe if the movie didn't completely shit the bed with his character it would have worked, but at this point complimenting his performance is like complimenting the deck chairs on the Titanic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:32:25 PM CDT

    Deadpool secret ending.

    by grypson

    From what I understand, one of the secret endings shows that the Weird multi-mutant Deadpool isn't the real deadpool, merely a clone.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:35:31 PM CDT

    The Titanic had really nice deck chairs.

    by mcvamp

    Really, really comfy from what I hear.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:37:56 PM CDT

    37% and falling on RT!

    by obsd

    Such a piece of shit. I'm glad I stole it and saved myself 10 bucks and a whole lotta rage. I will admit the Baby Wolverine "noooooooo!" stabby scene in the beginning is so bad it's fucking hilarious. I laughed all the way through the opening credits.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:38:28 PM CDT

    So, I was chilling with some friends last nite...

    by the dum guy

    And, a commercial for this movie came on. One person asked what Ryan Reynolds was doing in this, I said he was Deadpool. They then wondered why he didn't have a mask on.Seriously... the fuck?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:39:16 PM CDT

    I wasn't throwing any hyperbole at Ryan Reynolds

    by tolomey

    I just said that he was good in the role, I think he is right for the part and if Rothman left Fox tomorrow (or should we really be blaming a certain Ms Donner for being the hands on producer of this movie) then I would definately go and see it.
    If I was throwing hyperbole his way I would be saying; Oh my god, Reynolds is incredible in this movie, every time he was on screen I was transfixed. His performance reminded me of Brando in On The Waterfront, or DeNiro in Taxi Driver. Seriously, if this guys doesn't get an Oscar nod then I'm gonna stop going to the movies.
    That is hyperbole.
    In fact Gwai Lo, here is a definiton of the word for ya;
    Hyperbole is used to create emphasis. It is a literary device often used in poetry, and is frequently encountered in casual speech. It is also a visual technique in which a deliberate exaggeration of a particular part of an image is employed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:39:17 PM CDT

    KSmotorider

    by gwai lo

    I guess I should have assumed that someone with a user name like yours would already know how well the Batpod works, heh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:42:09 PM CDT

    The Sabertooth problem.

    by ksmotorider

    We had Sabertooth in the first film played by Tyler Mane, for consistency I think if they were to bring Sabertooth back he should have reprized his role instead of Liev Schreiber.



    In the first film Sabertooth was played as the not always capable right hand thug of Magneto. In this film Sabertooth appears to be played more as a smart leader who is the ideal adversary to Wolverine. Did the @$$ beating I assume Sabertooth get is in the Wolverine movie dumb him down...and make him blond and grow his hair long? Sabertooth (X-Men) http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1616287744/tt0120903 Sabertooth (Wolverine) http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3813903104/ch0001103

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:45:58 PM CDT

    The review quotes on this movie poster should read:

    by obsd

    "If you came to this movie to be disappointed, you won't be disappointed!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:47:56 PM CDT

    If you see one movie this year...

    by the dum guy

    You seriously need to get out more.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:53:04 PM CDT

    After reading a few comments on this TB

    by tolomey

    Can someone please explain to me why so many people are saying; "This movie looks like a piece of crap, how dare Fox screw up my favourite characters! Fuck them! I'm still going to pay my 10 bucks and see it though."
    It's crazy, don't these guys realise that they are funding these bad movies?
    If you think it looks like crap, if you have looked at all the spoilers and hate what you've read then don't go and see the movie.
    Make a definate stand, refuse to give them your money and if you simply must see it at some point, why not rent it from your local store and get as many of your friends round to watch it as you can, thereby impacting their rental revenue as well.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:53:24 PM CDT

    Reason no reviews yet from an AICN editor

    by headgeek

    Because FOX doesn't invite us to screenings - and I'm not gonna pay to see a bad film willingly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:53:40 PM CDT

    no subject

    by shaunkillsdead

    it was alright, really nothing special.


    I really didn't expect to say it, but Star Trek is going to blow this film out of the water.

    Like seriously... Wolverine was just a poorly written big budget cgi mess. Really.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:55:33 PM CDT

    harry.......

    by logicalnoise01

    HA well done, I'd rather stare at the iron man 2 pic for two hours that see that POS again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:58:52 PM CDT

    tolomey

    by gwai lo

    It's not just you. The fanboys have it almost unanimously that Ryan Reynolds was 'the perfect Deadpool'. Since this is based on a brief action scene and about ten lines of dialogue that occur before the character gets completely fucked up, all the gushing (words like: perfect, awesome, great, inspired, amazing, really cool) are hyperbole in my opinion. But thanks for the copy paste from whatever online dictionary most fits your opinion there. Ryan Reynolds WAS Deadpool, and look what we got. He gets very little of the blame, ultimately, but now he is an inextricable part of this disaster and will call up associations to it in any possible future take on the character. Even if, for the sake of argument, he was a really good Deadpool in that tiny part of the movie that didn't suck.. Does he fit the bill like no one else possibly could? There are probably thousands of actors who could nail a part that requires mostly witty dialogue, and stuntwork that can be done with a mask on. He did the same exact thing here as he did in Blade Trinity, so I just don't see what's so special about him. He's so middle of the road, charming in a romantic comedy I guess but just another pretty boy in an action movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:59:06 PM CDT

    im gonna go just to sneeze and cough real loud

    by bacci40

    i wanna see how many people i can scare the shit out of

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:59:12 PM CDT

    Amen, Harry!

    by obsd

    It really is terrible. Think Ghost Rider. About that level of dogshit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 10:59:26 PM CDT

    They should sell Adamantium bullets as you leave the theater.

    by fanboy71

    So you can forget the piece of shit you just spent two hours of your life watching.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:00:38 PM CDT

    Hey Harry,

    by tolomey

    good on ya. In some ways I would love to read the AICN guys rip this movie, but like I said in my post above, don't throw any more money at this movie.
    I saw it for free (I work at a cinema in the UK) and I still kinda feel ripped off.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:00:38 PM CDT

    "I'm not gonna pay to see a bad film willingly."

    by jesiah

    Does that mean you saw the workprint? Or Emma Frost as a "disco ball" turn you off to this film entirely? I ask out of curiousity, not to play the whole AOTC/WOLVERINE WORK PRINT song again

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:01:33 PM CDT

    I'm making a stand.

    by ganymede3010

    I'm not paying for this. I'm actually going to hold my ground. And fuck Gavin Hood and Tom Rothman.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:01:38 PM CDT

    everything Ebert said about it is right

    by browncoat_jedi

    HIs review is right on. This movie was worthless.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:03:33 PM CDT

    Thanks for the clarification Harry

    by miyamoto_musashi

    Did any of your editors go to the free screening, to a) meet the Swayne and b) see the movie ?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:03:33 PM CDT

    For whatever it's worth....

    by alexandra.dupont

    ... I am preparing a fairly detailed review of "Wolverine" -- which I'm assured Herc will have up on the site Friday.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:04:17 PM CDT

    there are two endings....really 3....but

    by bacci40

    the third appears in both cuts and is lame first ending finds wolvie in japan, drinking at a bar second ending shows deadpool grabbing for his head and telling the audience....SHHHHHHHHH BOTH SUCK ASS

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:04:30 PM CDT

    headgeek

    by joe arrow

    How do you know it's a bad film? 'EEWWW! Fox didn't invite me, so I'm not going to see it!' Real mature. People are right about you, you only give good reviews to your buddies. How's the leather smell in the back of those limos that pick you up for your comp screenings.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:11:18 PM CDT

    Thousands of actors who could play Deadpool?

    by fiester

    Name one.

    Ryan Reynolds is one of the only bright spots in this film. The casting of him and Liev Schreiber are spot on. I used to feel the same way about Hugh as Wolverine. I still do in a way, but it gets harder and harder with each new X-flick.

    I doubt we'll ever see a full-on trippy weird amoral crazy Deadpool flick with cancer-scarred Wade though. But Reynolds could do it and do it well.

    As for the guy who keeps complaining about this Sabretooth and the one from the first X-movie...c'mon, man. The first one was obviously not the genuine article. Make up any backstory you like (clone, Skrull, wanna-be). It happens all the time in the funny books: it's called a ret-con or No Prize.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:12:13 PM CDT

    How can a multi 100 million dollar project not have a good scrip

    by dixieflyer

    This is what I still don't get about Hollywood. How can you spend that much money on a project and not have a great story/script? Why can't they give a few million to the 5 best writers in the world and punch out a great story. It's like NASA launching a 300 million dollar mars rover mission and the lander is made out of those over sized fake legos.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:12:29 PM CDT

    Jimbo Spice, you dumb fuck, Brian Singer loves comic Movies.

    by ganymede3010

    I love it when I get to expose ignorant motherfuckers like you wrong. Singer cared deeply about this franchise. Before shooting the first movie he went undercover to X-Men conventions posing as a fan, asking random fans what would be cool in a X-men movie. Also, Lauren Shuler-Donner is trying to get Brian Singer back to direct a comic book movie for Fox. Last but not least Singer is rumored to be directing a movie based on the comic book Freedom Formula. So fuck off you stupid little prick. And stop embarrassing taking what you read in Wikipedia as gospel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:13:39 PM CDT

    but all i want to know is, how is the Blob?

    by bmacsmith

    cool villain. screw the rest of these clowns.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:14:16 PM CDT

    This shit movie doesn't deserve a dedicated talkbalk

    by gungan slayer

    No way in hell.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:17:14 PM CDT

    are Gambit's scenes different

    by jesiah

    Than in the workprint? Only reason I would see it, cuz Gambit is the cat's meow.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:24:07 PM CDT

    BMacSmith

    by tolomey

    The Blob is kinda lame. I thought that Kevin Durand was a very strange choice for the role. Also, his power is never really used or explained in the movie.
    There is a quick shot of him punching into a tank barrel which then fires. In the next shot he has bulked up a little bit, but it's a blink or you'll miss it gag.
    Later on in the movie Logan has to fight him to gain some information and Will.I.AM tell's Logan that Dukes (the Blob's name in the movie) has a problem with eating too much and is sensitive about his size.
    During the fight Logan calls him Bub, which Dukes hears as Blob and that is the only time that name is kinda used in that regard.
    I thought it was lame and I also wondered wether or not people who are not aware of the comics and The Blob would even realise what his power was.
    Hope that was enough info for ya.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:24:37 PM CDT

    Even if you didn't read the coimcs..

    by azzyazzy

    This movie blows. The fights are lame. The effects are lame. The story is lame. Wolverine is, well, not lame but not nearly as cool as that opening scene in Xmen when he's fighting for money. THAT Wolverine was tough. This one's just sensitive.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:29:08 PM CDT

    Joe - When a film drops below 40% on Rotten Tomatoes

    by headgeek

    and the studio in question decides not to screen it for AICN - I choose to make it a DVD/Blu-Ray experience - and then, only if they send it to me. I do think it is funny that the producers and Hugh Jackman would cozy up to kiss my ass in a crisis situation, but then wouldn't so much as screen the film here. I had free seats for a screening tonight at midnight, but I have to get up at 9 am to see a movie that might be worth a shit, so I'll give WOLVERINE a pass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:30:03 PM CDT

    Nerds-

    by robertplant

    Check out the Rob Liefeld classic, X-Force #2. You'll see Deadpool talk about how he had his mouth wired shut for 2 months. I hate to say it, but the mouth shut thing makes sense sadly...the powers-absorbing thing doesn't, unless someone knows otherwise...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:31:04 PM CDT

    SUCKS

    by supercowbell4therequestformorecowbell

    badly, sadly

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:31:15 PM CDT

    Hugh Jackman never was Wolverine...

    by magunga

    Wolverine has always essentially been Clint Eastwood a la "Unforgiven;" a bitter, self-loathing older man with a violent, blood-stained past who did the wrong things for the right reasons (i.e. protecting those he loves, or those who can't defend themselves). My favorite single story from his comic shows him in a bar listening to a group of thugs recounting how they brutally murdered the family of a young girl, who watched in hiding as each member of her family died by their hands. By the end of their tale they notice Logan eyeballing them, and they ask him, threateningly, what his problem is. He tells them that he knew the family and had found the girl cowering in the home, who begged him to help. He then gets up from his seat and kills everyone in the bar and walks out without another word. To me that encapsulates who Wolverine is, and the movies not yet done him justice. The first X-Men hinted at this, and X2 got even closer, but I always thought that Hugh Jackman never quite got him.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:31:44 PM CDT

    btw, Harry, what a hypocrite

    by robertplant

    Seriously you guys threw a huge fit about the leaked movie and then post bootleg trailers all the time. otherwise love the site. now you don't give a fuck about the movie because you didn't get a fwee paaasss? boooo hoooo

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:31:46 PM CDT

    that one pic of Gambit flying thru the air is enuf for me

    by bmacsmith

    not to see it. i have no idea what was happening, but it looked stupid and cheap whatever it was. I got bad Matrix Reloaded CG fighting memories from that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:33:48 PM CDT

    robertplant

    by tolomey

    Well, I never knew that, cheers for the info. Doesn't change how they messed with the other characters though.
    Good name BTW, which reminds me that it really has been a long time since I rock and rolled.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:35:08 PM CDT

    danguy54321 GO FUCKYOUSELF!

    by proman1984

    Seriously. You are a fucking Scumbag. Indy 4 rules!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:37:23 PM CDT

    blows

    by pandaman

    simple words: it sucked. I mean i watched a screening of the new star trek minutes before catching a screening of this movie and i'm not even gonna attempt to gauge how they compared to each other. it might have been that i was still high on what i saw in star trek that i might have taken some of this goodwill into wolverine. So it might actually blow more than i imagined.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:41:24 PM CDT

    Harry - Robertplant is on the money

    by miyamoto_musashi

    I hope you are reading your comments before you post them, because sometimes (like now) you come across as a seven year old who has just been told, that you have to make your bed and clean your room before you get any more lollies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:42:02 PM CDT

    The stench of disappointment...

    by raised fist

    Gambit is wasted and sounds like a reject from Varsity Blues. The video game cut-scene with he and Wolverine was better than anything the two did in the movie. His cards fly out of his hand instead of him tossing them. Michael Mann would be a good fit for the Wolvie franchise. This movie was too clean and pretty... needed some grit.

    I think the fact that Harry isn't willing to throw down 10 bucks for a ticket (and the obligatory 50+ dollars for snacks, hehe) is a bigger slap in the face to Fox and the film as a whole, than a shit review. Don't give in Harry!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:42:23 PM CDT

    So what the hell does Deadpool do in the comics?

    by bmacsmith

    i try to avoid all things Rob Liefeld at any cost, so i couldnt care less if they screwed him up (or Cable). but apparently someone else made him a cool character. All i remember is he carried a lot of poorly drawn guns and kinda looked like Spiderman.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:44:28 PM CDT

    This movie was worse than Indy 4.

    by fanboy71

    I'd rather sit through a marathon of Indy 4, Elektra, Ghost Rider, X-Men 3, Superman Returns, Howard the duck, Steel, and Spawn than watch this POS again. And that's saying a lot.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:44:53 PM CDT

    Aha! So it is a load of cods after all!

    by biggusdickus

    Now it'll all be down to toy sales. Will the kiddiwinks want a sparkly Emma Frost more than they wanted a Speed Racer dolly last year? The suspense is killing me.BTW Alexandra, nice to see you finally got the black typeface!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:44:59 PM CDT

    Saw it yesterday

    by cruzboy

    I really wanted to like it, (my girlfriend did, but she loves Hugh Jackman) but I was pretty disappointed. Action scenes were cheesy. Lots of unnecessary posturing. Minimum dialogue. Deadpool was wasted. The main thing was it lacked any real emotion. Instead of crying in the death scene, I actually farted. That's how much I cared. I'd give it a C+. Let's hope Star Trek's as good as the say.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:45:48 PM CDT

    pandaman, other viewers

    by miyamoto_musashi

    Is there anything redeemable about this film ?
    How would you rate Jackman's performance ?
    I am really amazed with the amount of stories, including origin stories for Wolverine, that they could screw this up so badly.
    Are all the characters thrown in to sell more toys.
    So much potential

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:49:26 PM CDT

    Can someone explain this Swaney guy to me?

    by aphex twin

    I missed the reference. Did he do a massawyrm-worthy review or is he just an urban myth?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:50:57 PM CDT

    hey robertplant fans

    by robertplant

    this is actually my song. it's supposed to be cheesey but I could use the nerd support and i mean nerd as a compliment as i am obviously one. http://tinyurl.com/dctzhp

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:53:20 PM CDT

    Magunga

    by cujo_fugate

    You're dead on brother! Wolverine deserves to be played by someone who exudes a constant threat of deadly, horrific violence. Jackman's a good actor but just isn't "dangerous" enough. Plus he's too goddamn tall.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:53:32 PM CDT

    JOSH SWANEY -- CUNT PUNCH #3,321.....BATTER UP!

    by dannyglovers_dickblood

    Basically, all you need to know about The Swane is that he bore himself 1,200 years ago today. Only punk motherfuckers need a +1 to push.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:54:29 PM CDT

    Here is a link to the Egbert review

    by tolomey

    I don't normally read his reviews but this one is right on the money.
    http://tinyurl.com/djy82s
    And Miyamoto_Musashi, I would say that Jackman was ok (same as before really, not feral enough for me), Reynolds was good in a limited role, Liev was great and Danny Huston was wasted.
    Everyone else was bad, bad, bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:55:27 PM CDT

    Aphex Twin

    by miyamoto_musashi

    Check out the last TB in the Top 10.
    He is definetely not likely any of us, he is on another level, he is more man than any of us could hope to be, but like Bale, he is real, not a myth.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:56:15 PM CDT

    BULLFUCKINGSHIT HEADGEEK.....

    by dannyglovers_dickblood

    No matter how bad the reviews. You would be there to check out Wolverine had you not watched the workprint. No way in hell would you wait for DVD to check this out. If you couldn't catch it tonight, you would certainly catch it this weekend.Seriously, grow some balls and admit you watched the workprint. It won't surprise anyone here.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:56:19 PM CDT

    slack justification for no aicn reviews

    by notmalcolmreed

    so now harry's a reviewer who doesnt review movies if rotten tomatoes is at 40%. god forbid he has to pay for movies like the rest of us. no doubt he's too morally upright to review the leak (because that wouldnt be fair to the makers of the movie). not good form for a self proclaimed headgeek.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 30, 2009 11:58:16 PM CDT

    NotMalcolmReed -- he saw it.

    by dannyglovers_dickblood

    Please see my previous post.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:00:52 AM CDT

    Excited for DuPonts Review

    by crow3711

    She always give a good one. I will be standing my ground and not paying to see this mostly because of Fox and Rothman, but also because its not worth my time if its really pretty bad. It'll be on HBO in a year or so, good enough. But I also agree with DGDB that Harry probably would go see it this weekend like a normal person if it weren't for all the hubbub surrounding this, not because its below %40 on RottenTomatoes. I usually agree with HeadGeek on everything he posts, but that rings just slightly untrue to me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:02:01 AM CDT

    so Harry you know it's a bad film how? WORKPRINT?

    by danguy54321

  • May 01, 2009 12:02:22 AM CDT

    Harry and Massa's analysis of Wolverine film

    by bduncan

    After Roger Ebert gave it 2 stars, it'd be interesting to read Harry and Massa's separate analysis of the troubled X-Men Origins : Wolverine film, in terms of what they reckon it did wrong and right.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:02:28 AM CDT

    Harry - you should be reviewing this movie.

    by professor_monster

    By not doing so simply because you didn't get a pass simply paints you as an in the pocket for hire person more than anything you have ever done. People accuse you of it, now prove them wrong. Pay your money like the rest of the world then come back here and give us what you think. I know a lot of people that come to this site who are dedicated to you and follow your opinion - I have never been one, but I do have some friends who feel you are on the up and up. You need to stop crying and do what you do or what you are supposed to do - review this film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:03:30 AM CDT

    here in my country open yesterday IT´S A MESS!!

    by vitter

    oh dear lord... where to begin? poorly written, edited, directed, cast choices(except hugh of course!) almost everything was out of place, victor creed was not so bad, but the brothers thing was sucky, yea i know maybe some comics hint it but come on, and the scen ala spidey 3 near the end the ¨BACK TO BACK¨ like Harry to pete ¨HEY BUDDY BUUUDDY ¨the hole damn third act of that wreck...
    oh and when you see what they did to Deadpool!!!!?!? he transformed into a superman mutant like, with swords as wolvies claws and shoots rays with his eyes like cyclops! WTF!!?!?!
    they way they executed the hole weapon x and the experiment sucked.. oh and how he loses the memory OH DEAR LORD, because they shoot him in the end with adamantium bullets, at the end! WHAT?? Gambit?? he gets two scenes and that´s it. no chery, monamy, no accent. nothing. Will i am... REALLY??? WHY?! when blob was the blob was cool though.. anyways, how can fox continue to pull this off man? they started well with singers era, but that was a looooong time ago! f4?x3? yeah i know there is more crap too but ok.. sadly marvel will never get or want those franchises back from fox, and sony as they prolly make all their slate of movies from that money so... anyways, i still think hugh jackman is great, but in this movie i felt like wolvie was not into character, and well not really wolverine like..imo. The CGI?? messsssssy... oh and the first scene were he is a kid and clawes his fake father, talk about poor execution in a scene...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:03:55 AM CDT

    DGDB - he is obviously worried about Fox lawsuits/blacklisting

    by miyamoto_musashi

    True the younger less Corporate Harry wouldn't have worried about that, but this one is way too worried to admit it.
    Hope to be proved wrong, but think there is a better chance of Hood winning a Oscar for this, than Harry admitting it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:03:58 AM CDT

    HARRY, STOP BEING A BITCH, SERIOUSLY.....

    by stefan2789

    I love ya big guy i really do, i love this site, but come on man, seriously, its getting very tiring and annoying with all the bitching on the movie, you know you hated the movie as soon as it was announced brett ratner was going to make x3, thats the bottom line, but saying you won't watch it till dvd, u either are a big ass liar...BIG.. or you watched the workprint, just spit it out, don't say you wont see it if really didnt watch the workprint, this combined with an actual post just to hate on the look of a character, its overkill, just say you didn't like it, its not fantastic four or anything, its better than x3, not as good as x1 or x2, don't go apeshit over something 6 months before you watch it, and continue it till actual movie is out and say you won't watch it cause u couldnt get in for free.....sorry for rant, i don't usually post unless its to get something off my chest lol...sorry, i really do think you are great, didnt mean the bitch part, love ya AINC

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:05:15 AM CDT

    "Fake news for Republitards"

    by zacdilone

    Like the real news on PMSNBC? Grow up already.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:05:56 AM CDT

    At Least We Know What We're Dealing With...

    by infamouskidd

    With the time, effort, and high standards of quality that they poured into Wolverine, just imagine what they have planned for "X-Men Origins: Magneto."

    Maybe they'll then try to regain some credibility by throwing assloads of money at Halle Berry to do "X-Men Origins: Storm." She can be bought for the right price, as evidenced by "Catwoman" and "Swordfish."

    Stick to your guns, Harry. Regardless of how many people call for you to review this one, just remember that those same people will not be able to give you back those 2 hours of your life that are gone forever.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:06:20 AM CDT

    OK SO X3 OR WOLVERINE?????

    by stefan2789

  • May 01, 2009 12:10:11 AM CDT

    It Could Be Worse Though...

    by infamouskidd

    It could be G.I. Joe.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:11:00 AM CDT

    he should review films and not get involved in politics

    by bmacsmith

    whoever heard of a film reviewer that refused to review films? especially the type of movies he has built a reputation on? I guess its cool if he just doesnt want to support bad filmmakers, Its just kinda weird to get into some power play with Fox over free screenings. Shit, i dont care if you steal it. Dont support them for the right reasons.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:16:39 AM CDT

    I have a question?

    by continentalop

    Did Harry ever say before this movie was released that it looked like crap? Or did Harry ever say before this film was released it looked great? Is there any previous post backing up ether one of those claims.
    The reason I ask is because i am wondering if Harry is saying he refuses to see a bad-looking film as a form of damage control for his image. .

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:18:11 AM CDT

    Wasnt that bad

    by the meaty one

    Although the CGI claws did look like something out of Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Desmond, from LOST should play Wolverine....Thoughts?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:22:11 AM CDT

    Meaty One

    by miyamoto_musashi

    From the reviews I have read, its really about Fox controlling this property and what they are doing with it, think the actors aren't the most important concern at the moment, think Jackman was fine in X-Men 2.
    How does Marvel get it back ?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:23:24 AM CDT

    Studios and directors don't give me free shit...

    by conspiracy

    and lately they have been ripping me off with the shit they have been putting outFuck Yes I watched the WP...And FUCK YES it sucked ass, and I do not mean just the unfinished effects either...everything sucked ass. I saved myself $$$ by previewing this before deciding on paying to watch it on the big screen...and any smart person would do the same.Everyone should avoid opening night of any movie...DL a pirate copy (usually up somewhere within 48hrs)...and decide if it is worth paying your hard earned $$$ to watch it in the manner it was designed to be seen in. And yes..if it is good..I'll PAY to go see it in a theater.THIS is going to be my standard operating procedure from this point on....review online...pay if it is good, don't if it isn't. If enough people do it..and stop just taking your fucking from Hollywood...perhaps they'll learn a lesson and start making QUALITY films.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:23:29 AM CDT

    Anyone going to see this tonight: F-U-C-K Y-O-U

    by industrykiller!

    And when they release that inevitably terrible Magneto film and the even fucking worse sounding X-Men: Year One we will have those fucking bastards to thank for it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:34:43 AM CDT

    Waddya think

    by the meaty one

    Heroes running to freedom.Large doors open. Sinister villan stands in the way. Hero produces his weapon. Villan does the same, only bigger. A fight, villian dies with a slice, cutting him in two. He falls into an abyss.......Do you think the writers had just finished watcing episode 1 an though,..... noone will remember that Darth Maul chap.... fuck it...Lets coppy it scene for scene.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:39:24 AM CDT

    Right on Meaty One

    by tolomey

    That's what I thought when I first saw it. Shameless.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:43:34 AM CDT

    coocoocachoo got screwed

    by the meaty one

    WTF. They should have made the kid in the beginning DOG LOGAN and Sabretooth Sabretooth. Why mix and match. I realise they have to appeal to everyone but its the fans that make them the money. BRING ON DESMOND from LOST....He gets my vote

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:46:16 AM CDT

    Guess who?

    by therealjoshuaswaney

  • May 01, 2009 12:47:55 AM CDT

    Sorry Harry, but that's fucking weak.

    by outlawsdelejos

    Seems more like a tantrum than any sort of protest. And since when has any external scoring system been a basis for YOU to boycott a film. You owe it to us to see this regardless of any grievance you have with FOX. You let us down man.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:51:06 AM CDT

    This wasn't a very good movie...

    by hjermsted

    I agree with the two-star ratings I have been seeing. Wolverine has a very pre-Dark Knight sensibility to it. I bet the studio wishes they could start this production over again. There were a couple funny lines/moments scattered throughout the film but not nearly enough character development. This film can best be summarized by the THREE scenes of James/Logan/Wolverine looking up at the sky and screaming "NOOOOO!!" That's about as emotionally intense as it gets. Beyond that... lotsa fight scenes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:52:20 AM CDT

    no subject

    by rachel_bowman

    "When a film drops below 40% on Rotten Tomatoes"

    Didn't stop the AICN parade of good cheer for FANBOYS, did it? That film was a flop and has a 31% rating at RT.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:53:29 AM CDT

    If you lost Harry you've really fucked up!

    by ganymede3010

    Harry Is a nice guy, but very gullible when it comes to reviewing cinema. When you've lost Harry Knowles (No relation to Beyonce) your movie doesn't stand a fucking chance.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:54:50 AM CDT

    Well. It´s Wolverine

    by _lizarkeo

    Never saw the leaked one. Don´t hate this Rothman dude (he did greenlight the first X-Men, a movie I waited for almost 15 years). Big fan of Lauren Donner (and Tom deSanto). X3 was great in parts, the flashback-Chuck-and-Mags, Kitty-vs-Juggs, super-powered-Mags and Madrox alone. Of course I rather see a Marvel production. But went to see the Wolvie movie anyway today (yesterday). It´s a geek magnet, yo. The Origin bit was kinda ok. You can see that Jackman understands and respects the character a great deal. Liev Schrieber was so bad-ass as the old Saber. Gambit was on the wrong movie, but was a kick-ass hero sidekick. Better than expected. The wrong and bad stuff, well, just ignore, man. If you want a great Wolvie, go watch the Wolverine Versus cartoons or read the current Old Man Logan. But the final battle was kinda cool, gotta admit. Team bros vs. Zombie Sylar = total frakin´ destruction. Well, congrats, producers. Now, I want to see a Marvel production of the New Mutants, written by Christopher Yost and Craig Kyle. With cameo galore of cool cats like X-23, the Joss Whedon´s Kitty, Lockheed, Jubes, the real and smoking hot Emma Frost as a teacher and so on. And a TV show of Peter David´s X-Factor. That would be super cool news indeed. Cheers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:01:12 AM CDT

    Fuck it, I'll admit it. I liked it.

    by v'shael

    At least I liked it a lot more than I thought I would. I'm not a mad comic geek, and I think I read one comic featuring Deadpool in my life.

    I rate this movie better than X3 (which was stupid in ways you didn't need to be a comic geek to get offended by. Like, where the fuck did the sun just go?)

    And miles better than Superman Returns, which I tried to watch twice and it sent me to sleep both times.

    And I think you have to give it up for Hugh for really doing his best with the material. I know I'll be in the 20% minority with that opinion. I suppose this must be what it's like to be a Republican right now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:03:41 AM CDT

    When you've lost Harry Knowles your movie doesn't stand a fuckin

    by outlawsdelejos

    Horseshit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:13:33 AM CDT

    I saw it.

    by ernestborgnine

    I liked it. It was fun. Lots of nods to stuff that happened in the comic book. Bone claws suck. Harry's a twat for not wanting to see it. Like you couldn't afford some blu ray if you paid to see this. You're being an asshole. Do your fucking job and watch the movie. Nobody cares about you not seeing the movie and not reviewing it. That's just retarded.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:14:05 AM CDT

    Stefan2789: X-3 By a country mile!

    by ganymede3010

  • May 01, 2009 1:14:57 AM CDT

    thing is i bet this movie isnt that bad.

    by bmacsmith

    might see it later. My expectations are so low at this point it might suprise me. Im a comic fan, but i can put aside my comic geekness and accept changes if its a cool story. I dont need a perfect adaption. nah, it probably sucks

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:20:23 AM CDT

    Harry, grow the hell up.

    by paul t. ryan

    You can't opt out of reviewing a movie just because you have a grudge against Tom Rothman, anymore than you should opt out of reviewing ANY film because you don't care for one the cast. It's childish and unprofessional. Other critics will review films out of their own pocket when studios decide against press screenings, so what makes you so special? For the record, I think Wolverine is the first true dud in the series. Flaws and all, I still enjoyed X3, and it was far more professionally assembled than this one. As others have said Harry, how can YOU know its a bad film unless you've seen it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:20:49 AM CDT

    Uh, Snakes on a plane proved this site doesn't

    by lockesbrokenleg

    make or fucking break anything.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:23:22 AM CDT

    Hello, from Long Island, NY

    by kevinmuller

    Just got back from the midnight showing of the movie. I am sorry to report that the film is very average, if that. I really loved the beginning of the film, thought the opening was great. As soon as Sabertooth killed his first victim, it just became a movie to fit every possible mutant in. Jackman and Leiv are good, some of the action scenes were nice, but it just didn't have the "umph" it needed.


    Did anyone notice the terrible CGI when Wolverine was playing with his new claws in the bathroom?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:26:41 AM CDT

    Wow Harry's getting fucked in 2 talkbacks

    by digitaldong

    where my popcorn?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:41:56 AM CDT

    What with the Pa and Ma Kent scene ?

    by theplant

    As in Superman ? That scene where Wolverine meets Pa and Ma Kent was laughable, BAD.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:45:08 AM CDT

    Film vs Workprint.

    by kizeesh

    Genuinely Some of the effects and CGI were better in the workprint.
    Also some ADR and dialogue replacements were changed for the worse.As to deadpool. I can see what they tried to do visually, i.e. make him look like the costiume without wearing a costume, (it became ultra apparent when his eyes shot lazers and the area around them turned black) But it's still a lame idea.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:48:32 AM CDT

    From the workprint...

    by jiggah

    I'm not going to bother putting money into this crap. I saw the workprint and realized even if they had done reshoots there they couldn't have changed the storyline. There's some stuff that it had going for it, and there's a lot of crap that pulls it down. Had they been reassured that it would be a two picture deal, I think it would have been so much better. They wouldn't have felt the need to throw every fucking possible mutant into it, and they would have actually given us what the title was suppose to be about i.e. the origins of Wolverine. If they made it a period piece between when he leaves his parents and maybe stop somewhere around the Civil War for the first movie, and then begin the movie at WWII to the present, it would have worked.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:52:14 AM CDT

    Josh Swaney speaks out

    by auriellis

    Check out the old Capone thread! He's finally acknowledged us!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:55:48 AM CDT

    This movie was exactly like the workprint.

    by cossack_says_die

    FAIL. EPIC FAIL. Why can Fox not getting anything right. Why? Harry, I feel bad for ya.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:03:33 AM CDT

    meh, pretty much what I was expecting, nothing more or less...

    by darth scourge

    Of course this movie takes massive liberties with the X-Men comic book canon, but then so do the other three X-Men films.

    The X-Men film universe essentially just uses the comic book source material & continuity as a general inspiration and changes whatever elements it wishes to serve its own narrative purposes... much the same way most comic book to film adaptations do.

    As a prequel to the other X-Men films though, this movie pretty much adequately serves its purpose I guess, and ultimately it's about as good/bad as X3 was.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:12:22 AM CDT

    terribad

    by ad1das_y0

    movie was fucking all over the place. only shining spots were reynolds as deadpool and leiv as sabretooth was decent.

    WTF @:
    will.i.am's "acting"
    sabretooths galloping
    terrible portrayal of gambit
    weapon XI/deadpool bullshit hybrid
    cyclops being a sniveling pussy
    horrendous special fx (ie. xavier, wolverine's claws, anything involving gambit)

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:25:53 AM CDT

    WOLVERINE much worse than X3

    by ninpobugei

    Okay, the good with the bad...


    THE GOOD: Not much, unfortunately. The movie starts great with some paraphrased scenes straight out of the Origin comic. Cut to Wolverine and Sabertooth (brothers) running off together and fighting in virtually every war that comes along, from the civil war on up. Decent acting, good storytelling. Sabertooth turns into more and more of a scumbag so the brothers get into trouble and recruited into the Weapon X program. So far so good.

    THE BAD: From that point forward, the movie turns to shit. We only see Weapon X working as a team once, and it's pretty ludicrous. Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) does some flashy sword work cutting bullets out of the air (silly) and that's about it. We meet the characters for much too short of a time to develop any interest in them.

    The later scenes with the Blob and Gambit were a joke and very uneven in their tone from the rest of the movie. Gambit has virtually no role in the movie and his actions make no sense and are never explained. He points Wolverine in the right direction and we pretty much never see him again. What a waste.

    Deadpool as the super mutant Weapon XI was preposterous and ridiculous. Swords growing out of his arms???? So how can he bend his elbows when they're sheathed? Very lame. Their battle royale at the end of the movie? About 10 minutes of anticlimactic fluff. Cyclops and the diamond-skin teenybopper had about as much of a role as Colossus or the Sentinel in X2.

    Overall, I give it 1 star for just failing miserably and producing a really uneven film...the tone and acting were all over the map. Jackman seemed genuinely invested in the character, but nothing new was brought to the table. He acted the same as ever throughout the whole movie. It added NOTHING to the character's development. Just a total bummer...probably THE biggest disappointment of the summer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:27:27 AM CDT

    WOLVERINE much worse than X3

    by ninpobugei

    Okay, the good with the bad...


    THE GOOD: Not much, unfortunately. The movie starts great with some paraphrased scenes straight out of the Origin comic. Cut to Wolverine and Sabertooth (brothers) running off together and fighting in virtually every war that comes along, from the civil war on up. Decent acting, good storytelling. Sabertooth turns into more and more of a scumbag so the brothers get into trouble and recruited into the Weapon X program. So far so good.

    THE BAD: From that point forward, the movie turns to shit. We only see Weapon X working as a team once, and it's pretty ludicrous. Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) does some flashy sword work cutting bullets out of the air (silly) and that's about it. We meet the characters for much too short of a time to develop any interest in them.

    The later scenes with the Blob and Gambit were a joke and very uneven in their tone from the rest of the movie. Gambit has virtually no role in the movie and his actions make no sense and are never explained. He points Wolverine in the right direction and we pretty much never see him again. What a waste.

    Deadpool as the super mutant Weapon XI was preposterous and ridiculous. Swords growing out of his arms???? So how can he bend his elbows when they're sheathed? Very lame. Their battle royale at the end of the movie? About 10 minutes of anticlimactic fluff. Cyclops and the diamond-skin teenybopper had about as much of a role as Colossus or the Sentinel in X2.

    Overall, I give it 1 star for just failing miserably and producing a really uneven film...the tone and acting were all over the map. Jackman seemed genuinely invested in the character, but nothing new was brought to the table. He acted the same as ever throughout the whole movie. It added NOTHING to the character's development. Just a total bummer...probably THE biggest disappointment of the summer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:49:58 AM CDT

    Matinee if you must, Wal-mart bargain bin if you can wait

    by hellboy700

    This was the exact opposite I was hoping for in a movie, especially a movie about Wolverine. Way to fuck it up Fox!! And yes, it is worse than X3.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:50:49 AM CDT

    I wish that mad guy would review it for AICN

    by brody77

    Can't remember his name - the guy who would always have us in stitches with his batshit reviews
    Argh, that's gonna annoy me now!

    Anyway, I've stated many times that Wolverine sucks big fat kahoona balls.
    Not sure if it's a Phantom Menace style fail yet, but it's pretty big.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:56:05 AM CDT

    Conspiracies...what I heard was....

    by monkeymanreturns

    . . . Fox knew this thing sucked. They knew this thing wasn't going to make much money - although they were/are hoping for a Ghost Rider type weekend - and to justify the bad return on investment to investors (who cos of the crunch are becoming antsy) leaked the the movie on purpose. The two reasons being:

    1. Film sucked. They knew it. Bad return on investment. Instead of taking the blame, they could turn around and blame internet hacks for the poor box office sales and;
    2. The leak would have the extra effect of forcing government to put in place more controls on internet downloads....much to the industries favour.

    Thats what I heard anyway....I am available to talk on the moon landing being fake; how the royal family killed Diana; how Israel was responsible for 9-11; and why Mickey Mouse is a fetish master (he's a mouse - lives in a house, goofy is a dog (?) and lives in a house but Pluto is made to be chained up to live outside...hmmmm....why?)

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:58:03 AM CDT

    And...

    by monkeymanreturns

    I am at work - typing fast so my boss can't see - I apologise for my grammar. My grandpa though is a jerk!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 3:04:28 AM CDT

    jackman sold out.

    by ccdev

    I was so bored and sad seeing this movie, it gave me a freakin headache. this piece of **** wolverine doesn't even disguise itself as another attempt to create more spin off crap $ for Fox. The story is disjointed, pacing is slow, characters are lame, action is meh and Logan only has 2 faces - angry or angrier. Hugh 'jackass' Jackman should stick to dancing and singing roles, he just doesnt feel 'dangerous' enough. And wolverine getting romantic and carrying a woman in his ams walking off into the sunset ala "Gone with the Wind" - gimme a freakin' break! This is a lite version of X3 and just as bad as van helsing, maybe worse with the extra expectation.

    watch this movie at the cinema if you want to feel shafted by Fox.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 3:17:09 AM CDT

    really?

    by batfan_415

    The movie was totally shit. It seemed very rushed. Why did he stop by the girl at the end? He "didn't know her". How does he even know how to walk or talk or anything if his memory got erased? Sabertooth never got his name in the movie. Deadpool, in my version after the credits, was still alive after being decapitated and shush'd the audience which totally ruined all of what Deadpool ever was. The merc with a mouth for all of 5 minutes. Gambit seemed a little too whiny. The blob fight was unnecessary. It started out strong, never explained how James got changed to Logan, why would an old guy give you his dead sons clothes and jacket? Bad CGI on his claws in the bathroom. I saw the claws shift but not his hands. Just an overall disappointment. I wish I could get my money back.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 3:28:44 AM CDT

    You people are really something...

    by freeno04

    I mean come on. I just got back from the movie and I really enjoyed it. It is 2nd in the series behind number 2. Anyone in here that is saying that it is as bad as x3 really has issues. The acting for the most part was great. Sabertooth was amazing which I was gladly surprised about and Jackman did a solid job like always. The deadpool thing could have been handled a little better but you still have to admit that the fighting on top of the silo was amazing. Stop falling into what I like to call TDK syndrom. You here all this buzz and no matter what you agree with it. TDK was extremely overrated and not even as good as begins. Wolverine is much better than critics are thinking. Just because you hate FOX doesnt mean you have to hate this movie for no good reason.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 3:29:10 AM CDT

    I liked it

    by deanbarry

    It entertained me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 3:35:44 AM CDT

    Do they even explain how he got...

    by blindambition238

    the name Logan? In the wp we find out hes called James, then people just start calling him Logan 15 mins in no explanation...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 3:48:47 AM CDT

    suspect??

    by the meaty one

    I think hey did some reshoots. Heres why. During the African mission Wade is wearing black vest and has a slick hairstyle. Then later, when the team are slaughtering the villagers he isnow witout his vest and as a curly hairdo. Continuity maybe but suspicious noneteless.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 4:07:00 AM CDT

    James Logan

    by deanbarry

    Fucking solved.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 4:09:34 AM CDT

    James Howlett.

    by the dark shite

    Not fucking solved.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 4:37:09 AM CDT

    What a terrible, terrible mess...

    by magunga

    This was basically a bunch of action-movie cliches poorly strung together into a 100-minute cluster fuck. This series lost its soul after the second movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 4:40:44 AM CDT

    By the way...

    by magunga

    ...our copy of the film was terrible. 6 times during the course of the movie either the audio went out or the film went dark. We had the Deadpool clip at the end, and the film appeared to melt at the end, so I'm not even sure if we saw the whole thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 4:47:42 AM CDT

    Question...

    by magunga

    ...How does a decapitated head "Shoosh" anyone? Did Stryker give Wade tiny little lungs in the back of his mouth? That was beyond silly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 4:59:38 AM CDT

    no subject

    by kizeesh

    What's very telling is that the version of Logan in Japan on the final movie has a different actress playing the barmaid than the workprint version. The movie one looks less like a transvestite.
    Also it's Deadpool. He can survive decapitation. Read the comics.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 5:08:35 AM CDT

    A living, decapitated Deadpool...

    by magunga

    ... is fine, but I want to know how he forced air through his teeth. It's a tiny logistical error, sure, but that bugged me nonetheless.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 5:27:01 AM CDT

    OH LAWDY LAWDY, IT SUCKED!

    by sexx ed

    First off, here's what's good:
    1) Hugh does justice to the role that made him a star, he's just instantly recognizable as this character. 2) Liev puts in great work as Sabretooth. 3) ... that's it. There you go, I was fair. Now for the much-deserved bashing. Fairly soon after I had settled into the rhythm of this movie, I began forming this mental image of some fat-cat hollywood type (Rothman?) tapping a Cuban and barking orders over the shoulders of the film crew - effectively injecting giant cliches and cookie-cutter dialogue into an already ill-conceived project. To critique every single offensive thing about this cash cow would involve time I don't have, so here's the big three, people: 1) The dialogue/script is cliched and dumb. I counted three instances that had my friend Alex and I muffling our laughter with our hands. That helicopter scene brought back memories of THE A-TEAM. 2) The special effects were amazingly bad. Not quite sure how that got by quality control - and if there was such a thing. 3) The continuity between the films is SKRIZZOOD. In closing, it really feels like this movie was intended as nothing more than a parting shot at our wallets by Fox using an iconic character as bait. Fuck those motherfuckers. Save it for Star Trek, homies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 5:30:25 AM CDT

    I see......but is it any good?

    by masteryoda007

  • May 01, 2009 5:39:08 AM CDT

    no subject

    by bucca

    It's an adaptation of a comic book character. C O M I C book.
    I know that there are people here who read way to much into all that comic book crap but the whole genre is mass market pulp so wtf do you expect from a film which whole existence is derived from mass market pulp? I like the Dark Knight and Iron Man but those are the exceptions of a rule, not the standard. Wolverine pretty much is the standard so if you like to waste some time reading a comic book you might as well go see this movie. If you're expecting a life changing experience filled with philosophical gems and ground breaking imagery you will be disappointed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 5:53:59 AM CDT

    Bucca

    by bmacsmith

    If you think comic books are incapable of "life changing experiences filled with philosophical gems and ground breaking imagery" then youre a goddamned idiot. Its a storytelling medium just like film, books, etc. and its capable of all the same things. I thought all you elitists died out decades ago. why are you on this site? have you ever been here before?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 6:09:09 AM CDT

    Bucca...

    by sexx ed

    I'm sure nobody here was expecting a transcendent experience from this movie, films such as TDK are certainly the exception in this genre. However, here we have a franchise that two movies ago was associated with great filmaking. Bryan Singer's films were great, the second better than the first. What I'm saying is that THIS MOVIE DIDN'T EVEN FUCKING TRY. An assault on intelligence earns the middle finger, no matter what type of picture you have.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 6:10:17 AM CDT

    It's a comic book movie

    by howzah

    Explosions, fighting, colorful characters. You guys all need to relax and take yourselves a little less seriously.

    BUT COMIC BOOKS ARE SERIOUS BUSINESS!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 6:17:04 AM CDT

    Josh Swaney skullfucked the workprint.

    by stuntcock mike

    Just like he fucks everything with a hole in it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 6:26:37 AM CDT

    If it ain't screened for AICN???

    by blancoshadow

    Then it's shit pure shit!!!!!! Now let me put on my Jar Jar Binks pajamas and cry myself to sleep...Some of these fuckers need to get laid...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 6:31:23 AM CDT

    www.superherohype.com

    by blancoshadow

    my new website...Harry you lost me...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 6:48:31 AM CDT

    howzah

    by dingbatty

    please take your 4chan memes back to that cesspool.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 6:55:55 AM CDT

    Howzah is a pretty cool guy

    by kizeesh

    eh writes tlakback posts and doesn't afraid of anything.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 7:32:48 AM CDT

    The movie might be bad but it broke

    by ominus

    all the records of the previews three xmen movies.
    just check boxoffice.com
    i think a man named rothman is laughing at us,right now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 7:34:20 AM CDT

    prevews=previous

    by ominus

  • May 01, 2009 7:38:09 AM CDT

    So It's A DISASTER, Huh?

    by laserpants

    Saw that coming from a hundred miles away. Sadly, it is more or less guarenteed to make a mint; but it won't be on my dime. I'm going to see Battle For Terra instead.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 7:38:35 AM CDT

    this just in...

    by cifra

    still to confirm, but it seems that the COMPLETED Wolverine movie has also been leaked DVD quality. If it's true, I mean, wow. There's someone at Fox that really wants this movie to bomb.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 7:43:57 AM CDT

    The movie isn't that bad

    by abominable snowcone

    people need to relax and stop expecting Godfather II when they go see comic book movies. Dark Knight and Iron Man set the bar pretty high, so high, I'd say, that it's not reasonable to expect others to get quite that close. Just go have fun. The only blatant thing that stunk was how they handled Deadpool

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 7:58:38 AM CDT

    Multiple endings occur after the credits?

    by bjornegar

    That means they are not "endings." They are post-credit teasers, and they are another legacy of craptastic Marvel superhero movies. The ending of a movie is the resolution of the plot BEFORE the credits roll. Just clarifying. I'm not really hating on you. If you are dumb enough to sit around for five to six minutes waiting for out-takes or some final joke, so be it. You were dumb enough to sit through the preceding 120 minutes, so you deserve whatever you get.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 8:12:10 AM CDT

    Joshua Swaney

    by bjornegar

    Was won of the "winners" to an advanced screening that this site was pimping weeks ago. All the other winners were listed here as "+1", meaning they were permitted, I suppose, to take a guest. (Spread the misery.) Josh, it was assumed, was going alone.
    For this, and this alone, I think, as I've never seen a "Josh Swaney" post in any Talkback, he's become a legend of sorts.
    I think he's a hero, willing to be placed on the front-line, forced to see this shitty film AND endure Hugh Jackman's jazz-hands in person, for the rest of us so we didn't have to, all while protecting his friends by not inviting any of them along.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 8:23:51 AM CDT

    ominus

    by logicalnoise01

    rothman can laugh all he wants, I saw the movie for free and he'll never get a dime from me for this POS. Ironman shat all over this movie and it came out a year ago. the one pic we got last night looks mor einteresting a cool than any 1 frame of the workprint I saw.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 8:33:26 AM CDT

    I told you all this movie sucked

    by erichaislar

    And Not to waste your time. The work print was ass and so is the finished film. no amount of re shoots or edits can save this film. It's just bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 8:37:04 AM CDT

    "Was won"

    by bjornegar

    Jesus, I'm not THAT fucking stupid, am I, asks the idiot who suspects he just may be.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 8:39:09 AM CDT

    Asimov, are you kidding?

    by bjornegar

    Box Office means all. EVERYONE uses it to justify / bolster their opinion. This is America. Only money really matters.
    And you're not above it either, so quit posing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 8:47:14 AM CDT

    "Works this way for clothes"

    by bjornegar

    Yeah, sure it does. Used to be, you could buy sneakers for five-a-pair and walk ten miles to school in them for an entire year and still have them all summer. Now, you pay seventy bucks just for the logo and your seams are busted on the first Thursday.
    Tell me, Asimov, how capitalism works.
    While you're at it, explain how you're gonna force the genie back in the bottle. After three, or so, decades of wretched movies making ever-more and more profit, Hollywood is not going to suddenly value quality over crap, even if the current movie-going generation were to magically develop something resembling good taste.
    I wish you were right, but you're not. I used to be an idealist, too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:03:43 AM CDT

    Its shit cause they didnt screen it for the geeks

    by six demon bag

    had it beeen good they wouldve been fighting to get it out there for positive word of mouth.. Harry no bitching cause he disnt get a screening he just smells the stink

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:13:32 AM CDT

    The movie works

    by knightsong

    I saw it the other night and the film was great. Perfect, No. But I dare you to point out the perfect X-Men movie, because there hasn't been one. Each movie has changed things, the question to ask yourself is if this movie's heart is in the right place. I'd have to say yes. I have would have easily sat down and watched it a second time and probably will. Harry is not supporting the movie because they didn't kiss his ass and let him pre-screen it. But I bet when it comes out on DVD it'll be in his list because FOX will be paying him to pimp it. Anyone who comes here should know one thing by now, it's that Harry's opinions are bought and paid for. He supported Van Helsing, and that movie was an ever-lovin turd of a film, but couldn't get behind Serenity; a movie that the love of fans begged for and their support got made. Stop listening to other people's opinions about these films and watch it for yourself.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:25:43 AM CDT

    NO EFFING BLOOD!!!??

    by kriscole

    OK ok, so in X2 we see a flashback of wolverine covered in blood, had just killed dozens of soldiers from the weapon x project, and here the entire movie wolverine draws not one drop of blood from any victims??!! not one cut of arm, no blood on his claws? nothing...wow.

    god this film is just another Xmen film it's not a WOLVERINE film!

    this film should have been about WOLVERINE and his relationship with CREED and the weapon x program and correct me if I'm wrong here.....but wasn't the weapon x program and EXTENSIVE PROGRAM THAT LOGAN ENDURED???!!! didn't they USE HIM for missions as an assassin?

    IT WAS FIVE MINUTE scene, and he stabs one soldier and gets away.

    So much potential with wolverine to tell a tragic EPIC story spanning through time and showing him doing all the things that in time he comes to realize isn't who he really is.

    'I'M THE BEST AT WHAT I DO, AND WHAT I DO ISN'T VERY NICE" well why don't we get to see you do any of that shit!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:28:52 AM CDT

    coincidences?

    by cifra

    Name 3 DVD-quality screeners that leaked via internet of b.o. blockbusters wannabees: The Phantom Menace, Dragonball: Evolution and X-Men Wolverine: Origins. What do they all have in common? Fox distributes them. mmmm...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:33:12 AM CDT

    I mean...

    by cifra

    not in Awards season releases, where the screeners abound. The 3 of them have been right before summer season, and the 3 of them potentially damaging given the low quality of the films.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:44:25 AM CDT

    Fuck you Freeno04

    by nightarrows

    TDK was FAR from "overrated", in fact it did what EVERY FUCKING COMIC MOVIE SHOULD DO, create a solid STORY, with good WRITING, then wrap the hero shit around it. Wolverine was fucking GARBAGE, and the fact that you or anyone else is defending it, even slagging TDK to try and lift Wolverine up is fucking pathetic and the very reason we get shit like this, Daredevil, FF, FF2, etc. etc. instead of quality like Begins, TDK, Iron Man, etc. etfuckingcetera. Of course those who liked Wolverine probably liked Transformers, listen to Britney Spears (or (insert shitty studio produced shit band) here)). So in closing, die.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:49:17 AM CDT

    The hyperbolic venom directed at this film is silly.

    by thelastcleric

    It's a flawed film to be sure but comparing it to Spiderman 3 or Elecktra is just ridiculous. There are some pretty well-staged actions scenes and one very, very good scene with Reynolds that is truly awesome. Again, they hacked and diced the mythos but so did Singer so I really don't get the level of hatred for this flick.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:51:16 AM CDT

    And FUCK ROTHMAN AND FOX.

    by nightarrows

    Nuff said.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:53:52 AM CDT

    Wanna know why there is such hatred for this flick?

    by nightarrows

    It simple. We've waited for a solo Wolverine effort for quite some time. It SHOULD be awesome. It SHOULD learn from previous examples of great comic flicks. It SHOULD have been handled with care and left to those who know what the fuck they are doing. Instead we get middle of the road, poorly constructed moldy Fox diarrhea. Is it the worst movie ever made? No. Is it what it SHOULD be? FUCK NO and THAT right there is why people are pissed because too many comic movies end up down this path.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:55:04 AM CDT

    TheLastCleric

    by tiberius_prime

    AGREED. While not the greatest Marvel movie, it is easily better then Daredevil, Hulk , Elektra, X-men 3, Spider-man 3 and Ghost Rider, when you think about it like that, it's actually closer to the top then bottom...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:56:21 AM CDT

    Oh Forgot...

    by tiberius_prime

    It's also better then both the Fantastic Four movies and all 3 of the Blade movies...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:03:20 AM CDT

    Hey BMacSmith

    by bucca

    Since reading isn't your forte, you might want to check this movie out. I never said that comics aren't capable of "life changing experiences filled with philosophical gems and ground breaking imagery" I did say that you shouldn't expect such. Big difference. There are a gazillion issues of comics with nearly as many protagonists and villains and most of it is utter crap. Entertaining, yes but crap nevertheless. That is the standard, whether you like it or not. The gems are there but few and far between. Same goes for this flurry of super hero movies. They are made to make money and in return you get an hour and a half's worth of heroes, villains and explosions. Wolverine is right on par with that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:10:53 AM CDT

    Tiberius_Prime

    by thelastcleric

    Yes, when you really start to rank it among the truly utter shit that Marvel/DC films have put out, it does fare better than expected. I think what is really interesting is how many unique snowflakes online actually have a hive mind which in turn made them decide this film was going to suck before they saw a single minute of footage. When I look at some of the geek films that get masturbated to on these boards, the anger being leveled at Wolverine really does seem hypocritical. And while I like Harry, he can fuck off on this particular film considering he endorsed Daredevil, which really is one of the worst films I’ve ever sat through.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:13:59 AM CDT

    TheLastCleric

    by tiberius_prime

    Yeah I get the feeling a lot of the bile is coming from people that haven't seen the movie, so really I guess they should STFU, and stop being sheep.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:20:10 AM CDT

    after the credits?

    by mrfantomashawk

    whats all this shit about something happening after the credits, anyone know what it is?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:24:47 AM CDT

    pretty good movie

    by thenaturalist

    seen the movie here in australia tonight. decided to see it to compare it to the workprint which i saw and hated.

    i saw it with no expectations and by suprise i came out liking it a lot. seing it completed with the proper SFX, colour grading and proper cuts it was a well drawn out action movie with a decent plot. not great but pretty good.

    it made more sense seeing it properly and i enjoyed it unfolding like seeing it for the first time because it looked more dynamic in the action sequences and the movie was properly colour graded to make it darker and grittier and the proper music helped it flow nicely.

    The work print was like the deleted scenes on dvds. they dont look right. now we know its because the scenes that are chosen are worked on heavily to look good. thats why the workprint looks off, even in scenes with no SFX.

    im suprised by the comments here on the site verging on hysteria and paranioa. anyone who likes it must be an agent of fox.

    a lot of people are questioning the reality & plausibility of the movie when its a fucking comic book movie with a guy with bone claws for fuck sake.
    its a MOVIE! it dont have to make sense in our world. this is the mutants world where this is what happens.

    its about being drawn into the characters and this new world with these new rules and being carried along with a good story.

    there are a lot of whinging guys on this site with vagina's who prefer a movie with a first class plot and drama over a macho adrenaline, testosterone fueled action movie which is examplified by the films superb opening sequence which sets the tone of the movie.

    thats fine. they can go back and keep watching their atonements and sister hood of the traveling pants.

    i'll keep watching my action movies and having good fun along the way. remember your childhood.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:25:17 AM CDT

    I'm going to see it this afternoon...

    by allykatd

    so I'll be back later with a review from a long *long* time fan of Wolverine comics since the '80s and a partial fan of the Xmen movies (they were decent, but not altogether satisfying). And being a long time fan I have to say that even the Xmen movies got Wolverine only partially right. There were flashes of the real Wolverine in X2 (when Stryker attacked the school)and a bit in X3 (the fight in the forest). In X1 Wolverine's relationship with Rogue somewhat parallels his relationship with Jubilee. Anyway, there are postive reviews from comic geeks (who I trust more than the general reviewing public) that I don't think it's as bad as Harry or other people are claiming.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:29:52 AM CDT

    Really, really bad...

    by fa_tass_dinomolester

    There was potential here, and possibly a good, if not great, film somewhere between the early Benioff script and the final version. But they really did fuck it up: as others have said, too many characters, a pissant, nonsensical plot, bland Hollywood action-movie style, ETC. But what really pissed me off was the complete and utter abandonment of any sense of continuity between this and the first two films. I'm not a continuity whore just to have something to bitch about, but because I like being drawn into a believable, single, fully-realized world, which is not possible with Wolverine. And I HATE HATE HATE that they took a page from the George Lucas playbook, namely that all of the characters used to hang out before they met "for the first time" in the original films. Didn't we learn anything from the god-awful SW prequels? No? Not surprising, considering this is from 20th Century Fucks, and that bumbling twit Rothman. Guy thinks he's the incarnation of Alan Ladd Jr...not even close, Rothman, YOU PUSS! PUUUUUSSS! I mean, ROOOOTHMAAN!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:30:17 AM CDT

    And by the way, I'm not paying to see this shit either!

    by fa_tass_dinomolester

  • May 01, 2009 10:35:24 AM CDT

    First Blood

    by erichaislar

    Is how you do a Wolverine Origin film. Nuff said.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:11:45 AM CDT

    Christian Bale: Terminator rant recording a violation of trust a

    by thanos0145

    Here's the link: http://tinyurl.com/d22ev9

    Filming crew=UNPROFESSIONAL

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:21:00 AM CDT

    FUCK YOU FAT AICN BITCHES. I Will See it tonight.

    by ragermac

    Who gives a fuck about how the movie turns out. I am sure I will enjoy the action and I am not expecting some academy award winning moments. Just a good silly action movie.

    So fuck off haters

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:48:48 AM CDT

    So wheres teh WOLVERINE movie

    by kriscole

    the xmen films were great in the sense that you could see many diff mutants on screen....but I've been waiting for wolverine to get HIS OWN FILM FOCUSED ON HIM....and I just got another xmen film.

    man there was plenty of material there to show how VICTOR throughout the years begins to have a lust for blood and killing, and his relationship to wolverine wanting to move away from a life of war and killing,...and because of him wanting to leave that life and find something being a part of capturing logan with stryker and forcing him into the weapon x program and making him into a killing machine like his brother.....and after some assassin missions wolverines mind rejects the implants and he breaks free of weapon x at the end doestroying the facilities and hunting down every motherfuckr involved he can find before his mind is full wiped by the damage of the weapon x program, and the last thing is him getting on a plane to japan to track down the last guy.
    theres plenty there, shit you could draw a number of story lines that FOCUSED on wolverine.

    wolverine didn't even go berserker!

    and wait he decides to throw team x away after this one mission but we don't see any other missions? we don't even see a build up of why this time he decides it's enough?

    you know the best wolerine I've seen so far was in "HULK VS WOLVERINE" where he cuts mofo's in half, cuts arms off, he aint' effing around, leaving dozens of bodies all cut up in his wake. thats wolverine

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:54:53 AM CDT

    Someone should move this to the left column.

    by shermdawg

    It's gonna get pushed off the front page by tomorrow. Something like this should be up til at least Monday or so.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:57:54 AM CDT

    Wow...

    by magunga

    ...apparently, the bar for enjoyable movies is very, very low for some of you. "Wolverine" checked its logic at the door at scene 1, and things just got sillier as the film progressed. Who actually thought that it would make sense for Wolverine to deflect Cyclops' optic blast with his claws without losing an inch of ground? The force of the blast was described in the first film as being powerful enough to punch a hole through a mountain, yet it's not strong enough to knock over a normal-sized man (albeit a man with metal on his bones)? Also, why would Stryker waste his incredibly valuable and amazingly rare meteor-metal on a person he knew he couldn't control? On that note, Why did the adamantium have to be applied over wolverine's entire body all at once? Also, how is it that the "magic" bullet caused brain tissue damage and subsequent memory loss yet the 600-foot fall from the cooling tower didn't squish his brain into jelly (causing permanent memory loss)? I'm barely scratching the surface here, folks. I saw this with my 17-year-old niece who loves big, dumb action flicks and even she was mumbling, "What the fuck?" under her breath.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:58:10 AM CDT

    Leave no cliche behind!

    by biggie kaiju

    Opening credits montage. Hero walks away nonchalantly while fireball erupts behind him. Camera angle above hero's head as he unleashes his anguish with the nuanced line, "Nooooo!" Hero torn between who he 'wants' to be and what he 'really' is inside. Running, leaping and climbing that defies the laws of physics. Characters conveniently appearing out of nowhere at a crucial moment. Poorly-rendered CGI backdrops. Hero finds out something he thought was true was staged to manipulate him. Kind and friendly person shot ruthlessly and suddenly to break the silence (and the tedium.) Movie ending with aerial panorama pulling back from the ground. I'm sure there are many others. This whole movie was been there, done that, been there again...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:03:20 PM CDT

    What the Hell are some of you guys talking about...

    by wandering_prophet

    "We've been waiting for years for a solo Wolverine movie" "Fans wanted a solo Wolverine movie" Open your eyes, as far as I can tell we've had 4 fucking Wolverine movies, speaking for myself I'm looking forward to a good X-MEN movie someday, if We're lucky without Wolverine altogether. The character is as played as played can get. If your reading the comics right now, Cyclops is 10x more interesting currently, focus a fucking movie on him.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:06:20 PM CDT

    Another Problem...

    by magunga

    ...After being asked by Silverfox why Stryker wanted him so badly, Wolverine responds plainly, "Because I'm the best at what I do," yet the only mission with Team X we see him attend he does pretty much nothing but complain. HE'S SUPPOSED TO BE THE FUCKING MAIN CHARACTER, AND HE DOES NO-DAMN-THING!!! Even the flaccid teleporter Kestrel did more than him, and all he did was point a gun at someone!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:24:55 PM CDT

    CUNT WAIT FOR XMEN REBOOT!

    by the green gargantua

    It will rule.

    a short hairy Wolverine! A Phoenix energy aura that is actually shaped like a bird! Shit, maybe even some superhero costumes!!??
    HFS, maybe even a visionary director that has balls and love for the source material.
    thad be nice.

    They should just Introduce the rebooted Xmen in the end of the Avengers trilogy.


    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:47:22 PM CDT

    wandering prophet

    by kriscole

    what people mean by "solo wolverine" is a movie that soley focuses on him without a pot full of other mutants or mutant cameos. there was no development of his or anyone elses character in the movie.

    I give you that wolverine was made the main protagonist in the x-men movies, and I'm all for a more balanced xmen flick.

    but I was thinking, maybe they RE-TITLED it "XMEN ORIGINS:" because someone realized that it's really not a wolverine film but, an xmen origins film

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:54:20 PM CDT

    Saw it today

    by neoaddix

    I quite enjoyed it, though I have to agree with other posters that it lacks emotion. Having said that, I would still prefer to watch this again over the travesty that was 'X3'.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 12:59:30 PM CDT

    saw it, will see it again just to piss off fat complaining loser

    by ironic_name

  • May 01, 2009 1:00:15 PM CDT

    s

    by ironic_name

  • May 01, 2009 1:01:06 PM CDT

    and, oh yeah, all those virgins are gonna see it too

    by ironic_name

  • May 01, 2009 1:01:35 PM CDT

    cuz you're boycotting it. just like you did with transformers

    by ironic_name

  • May 01, 2009 1:01:53 PM CDT

    and the dark knight

    by ironic_name

  • May 01, 2009 1:02:34 PM CDT

    fat fucks are spineless, and will be there with popcorn.

    by ironic_name

  • May 01, 2009 1:04:13 PM CDT

    good job tubby, they really were worried about your boycott

    by ironic_name

  • May 01, 2009 1:06:00 PM CDT

    and comic deadpool is as funny as dane cook or carrot top

    by ironic_name

  • May 01, 2009 1:07:15 PM CDT

    Green Gargantua, that will naver happen

    by ironic_name

    like you touching a woman's breast or doing a sit up.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 1:35:56 PM CDT

    Cyclops is wearing underoos

    by grammaton cleric binks

  • May 01, 2009 1:37:37 PM CDT

    Thank god for Marvel's interest in reboots.

    by il_deuce

    When Fox loses rights, maybe they'll find someone that actually knows what the fuck they're doing.


    A guy can dream, can he not?


    And Harry, fuck you. You're a bitch. Hypocrite motherfucker.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 2:20:05 PM CDT

    ironic_name:

    by the green gargantua

    Actually when I was touching your moms tits I noticed evidence that she had never breast fed. Perhaps this explains your inner torment. Alas, now I must eat chips and watch BSG, perhaps masturbate.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 4:09:01 PM CDT

    Cyclops has the "gay condition"

    by stuntcock mike

    Not that there's anything wrong with that. But fuuuuuck, he's a weak cunt.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 4:33:40 PM CDT

    well...

    by teddanson37

    Saw this at midnight last night. And I admit my expectations were low. But I was shocked at how good it was. I went by the comic book store this morning only to end up in a long conversation with the owner (who was reluctant to see it at midnight) and another employee and they both were fond of it despite it's flaws. it's not a perfect movie. it's no piece of art. it's pure entertainment with sh*t blowing up left and right, people getting stabbed, stunts that make little to no sense, CGI that's just plain ugly, and lot's of cheap dialogue. I do think there's a good movie under there some where though. It's better than either Fantastic Four film, Spider Man 3 (which i liked), but it's no Iron Man or Spidey 2. But what do I know. I actually enjoyed X-men 3. I know that movie has flaws of it own (probably more than this movie). But in retrospect i think X-men 3 really just tried too hard. And they had a year to make it. And the first two films didn't have as much going on and focused on just a couple of the characters and in ways they never really captured that spirit of the team aspect that X-men 3 seemed to at least shoot for even if the mark was missed. Here the team is gone but once again I think they tried to hard. throwing in Gambit and Emma Frost seemed forced. The transformation of deadpool was just a bit too much (optic blasts? seriously) although the scene after the credits was awesome (he breaks the fourth wall!) The Xavier cameo (while sort of crappy looking) was pretty awesome. The story line seemed to jump around too much. look here they're fighting in wars. probably some good material there. nope, moving on. now there's this team x junk. wolverine and a bunch of other mutatns. this is going to be cool. nope, we're still getting to the main story. now he's a lumber jack in love with hot hot hottie. well at least she's easy on the eyes. nope, she's dead and we're moving on. ok he's back with stryker and getting revenge on victor. this will be a good little set up for an inevitable double cross at the end of the film... nope, he's just going to double cross him now. moving on. there's about twelve great ideas for a good movie in this one movie and we don't focus on one thing until after the first hour. but it's a fun ride. probably should have been made into like three films. one ending with team x break up and two ending with the adamantium process and so on. i know there's no way fox could or should have made three wolvie films. but that's the only way this story would have worked. it's no where near perfect. but it's no disaster either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • dont listen to pussy harry, he just wants free tickets and then he writes good reviews about a movie like he already did for tarantino!;)

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 5:08:28 PM CDT

    Never Thought I'd Say This But...

    by hapapapa72

    WE NEED A REBOOT.
    Keep Hugh(he deserves it, just WETA his height down to 5'6...I know, not comic canon, but shit, better than 6'3). He'll still be in okay shape in a few years.

    Keep Liev? From what I've heard he and Hugh are the only ones actually okay in this.

    No other mutants. None.

    Plop him down into Japan...Mariko... Yakuza... maybe Sabes looking for him? Flashbacks to a more brutal Weapon X procedure? Blood, lots more Wolvie hair, spikes outta his body, etc...

    Anything... just don't let Wolverine die with this movie.

    Nolan rescued Batman from rubber nips and day-glo costumes. Any ideas who could bring Logan back from this cinematic fate? Let's stop bitching and work the problem, people!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 5:16:33 PM CDT

    Rights to Marvel movies

    by coooldbloooded

    When does Marvel regain the rights to X-Men, FF, etc. so they can start making quality movies instead of shit. Marvel has to be pissed about what Fox is doing to their properties.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 5:52:13 PM CDT

    I liked it aside from the Roger Rabbit claws

    by paulmkelly

    There was some seriously inconsistent CGI in this movie. I can't believe they had so much trouble with his claws. They should have had that locked down on day one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 6:45:39 PM CDT

    exactly paulmkelly - the claws did suck at times

    by geeko2000

    I never once noticed the claw problem on all three X-Men movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 7:46:07 PM CDT

    I really liked it

    by cherryvalance

    I thought it was supposed to suck? (I'm gonna read the talkback after I post so as not to have a contaminated opinion.) I never read the comics but did watch the TV cartoon. It seems like the story of this movie was mostly the same from what I can remember of Wolverine's backstory from that. And it was executed really well, so I don't understand the horrifying buzz this movie had. One thing I didn't like was that they had the manliness of Keamy (I think I'm calling Kevin Durand "Keamy" for life.) only on screen for like 3 seconds before they ruined his manliness and got rid of him. And Dom too. What was that? I feel like maybe there was a huge chunk that got cut in the beginning. But either way I still really enjoyed it. I thought Hugh and Liev were great together. Since we can't have Josh Holloway, that Gambit guy will do. I really liked all the fights. I mean I dunno, the effects didn't stink or anything. If it wasn't for the economic crisis I would see it again. Truth be told I think I like it better than Watchmen. In fact I think it's my favorite movie this year so far.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 7:55:33 PM CDT

    Boring

    by robotsinc.biz

    So lame... Save your Money! Wait for it on cable in two months :)
    Apres credits scenes were pointless!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 7:56:55 PM CDT

    A steaming bowl of bowel chowder

    by victarion

    This was a kick in the groin! Wolverine has never been my favorite Marvel character but I was excited anyway. Hugh and Liev I thought did great but overall the movie was just terrible... I mean really really really terrible. The recent GREAT comic movies apparently haven't taught everyone how it should be done. What they did to Deadpool was criminal, Gambit was just retarded and had no business being in the movie in the first place, again Cyclops gets the shaft and I agree that the effects were very poor. The war sequence was the highligt of the film and just happened to be the credits... F-

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 8:29:32 PM CDT

    Okay now that I've read through this

    by cherryvalance

    I can see that I was supposed to know who Deadpool is. And the Blob. I did not.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:28:20 PM CDT

    Jackman not cool anymore

    by zooch

    He's officially famous enough to be obviously horrible now. 2 bad X-Films. Terrible Oscar host. Pee'd his own pants. Jackman is off the team.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:30:44 PM CDT

    Not as bad as some are saying

    by pornking

    This film is entirely mediocre, but not anywhere near the abomination some were proclaiming. Sure, it really could have used a much more thoughtful script, and it pissed off a lot of comic fans with Deadpool's portrayal, but it wasn't that bad of a movie if you knew nothing about any of the characters beforehand.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 9:48:20 PM CDT

    but it wasn't that bad of a movie if you knew nothing about any

    by robotsinc.biz

    I didn't and it was still mediocre!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:13:48 PM CDT

    Jimmy! JIMMY! JIMMY!!!!!!!!!

    by anything but tangerines

    I'm sorry, fellow theater-goers, but I just couldn't help it. I haven't laughed that hard in a long time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:17:15 PM CDT

    no subject

    by anything but tangerines

    You just don't yell at Wolverine and call him Jimmy 3 times and get away with it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 10:17:51 PM CDT

    Jimmy didn't like this movie

    by anything but tangerines

  • May 01, 2009 10:18:27 PM CDT

    Jimmy thought even the "secret endings" disappointed

    by anything but tangerines

  • May 01, 2009 10:18:55 PM CDT

    Jimmy shouldn't have stayed thru the credits

    by anything but tangerines

  • May 01, 2009 10:19:14 PM CDT

    Jimmy wants his money back

    by anything but tangerines

  • May 01, 2009 11:22:00 PM CDT

    I liked it for what it was, a FOX produced Marvel movie

    by tylerdurden3395

    Had zero expectations and I got a fun, dumb, summer movie, which is really all I wanted

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:35:27 PM CDT

    Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool

    by th3480

    Best. Casting. Ever.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:36:30 PM CDT

    Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool

    by th3480

    Best. Casting. Ever.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:44:17 PM CDT

    Now That is Fucking Good Wolverine!

    by wrecks

    http://tinyurl.com/co27uc

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 01, 2009 11:46:36 PM CDT

    This film is shit. Pure and simple.

    by replicant23

    I'm not even going to try to put up a defense of any aspect of this film in an attempt to sound "fair and balanced", if you'll forgive the phrase. This thing stunk. Sure, it had laughable special effects, an incomprehensible lack of gore given the subject matter, three dramatic shots of Wolverine looking up at the overhead camera and quoting Darth Vader in Ep. 3 ("Nooooo" or "Arrrgh", not sure which), complete lack of motivation for Sabertooth (the shots of whom running on all fours were painfully hilarious)...but the kiss of death was the fact that it was BORING. And that is the ultimate pass/fail for a film. It was dull as shit. I wasn't bored in any of the other X-Men movies (including X3, which shows that I'm not a stuck up film snob), but this one was so full of stupid cliches and silly "wolverines howl at the moon" "emotional" scenes...wow. Just wow. Epic fail. Don't waste your money.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 02, 2009 12:52:11 AM CDT

    Jesus fucking christ Wrecks!

    by blindambition238

    That video game cinematic is what a Wolverine movie should be:

    Blood, guts, impaling, holes get blown through body parts...

    Blur studios does it again...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 02, 2009 1:26:44 AM CDT

    mrfanthomashawk

    by bjornegar

    After the credits one of the following brief scenes occur, depending on which "alternate version" you've sat miserably through:

    1. Wolverine is seen drinking heavily at a bar and mutters, "I'm drinking to remember."
    2. "Deadpool's" head spits "SHHHHHH" at you.
    3. Edward Norton shows up, thanks Hugh Jackman, you know, "For making my shitty movie look a little better by comparison," and the two take off singing and dancing, as the camera pans to reveal an audience of gay-friendly Oscar celebrities oohing and ahhing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 02, 2009 5:20:28 AM CDT

    It's as good as a Tom Rothman raped movie can be

    by tylerdurden3395

    No soul, no personality, BUT things go BOOM real good and it's never boring.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 02, 2009 10:15:00 AM CDT

    What happened to Miller-Claremont Wolverine

    by johnny_blade

    I was really hoping to see a lot of the original Frank Miller & Chris Claremont Wolverine mini-series. I think of the scenes in the trailer is almost stolen directly from a panel in that series.

    Instead, it appears Marvel has gone all Lucas on us, looking for money through merchandising. This is Marvel's "Phantom Menace." The only thing missing is Jar-Jar...

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 02, 2009 11:29:09 PM CDT

    Did they fix the 2nd ending?

    by disfigurehead

    The one where he is in the bar in Japan? The ho in the bar is not very Japanese.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 03, 2009 3:45:44 AM CDT

    It was... OK. Seriously people, it's not that bad.

    by kid idioteque

    Hugh was fine but there were a lot of poor casting choices and some truly awful special effects. A lot of potential here, but overall it was just passable. There was a good movie in there somewhere, but this wasn't it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 03, 2009 4:01:43 AM CDT

    My 2 Cents...Bub

    by lastboyscout

    Saw the film on opening night. I was absolutly pumped.

    I was a little disappointed that they used up all of the war and childhood scenes in about 5 minutes. I mean, the scenes were great in themselves but they could've done a lot more with them.

    They could've had all of that been at least the first twenty minutes of the movie.

    When Wolvie gets his metal put in and he escapes, it only takes him about 3 kills 30 seconds to get out of the facility. What? They couldn't hire more than 3 extras for him to kill? Some security. Lock it down, my ass.

    What happened to all of the people he slew in the comic?

    Gavin Hood and the writer should've taken notes from the Weapon X - Barry Windsor Smith run.

    There were quite a few missed opportunities here.

    All of that aside. I enjoyed the movie a lot! Good action scenes. Awesome growling. Not enough scenes with Jackman and Schreiber.

    All of the actor's were pretty much dead on.

    Loved the scenes where Wolvie comes calling for Sabretooth after he finds out he killed Silver Fox.

    It was a good film, but not great. I think if they treated the source material more seriously and stuck closer to the comic story line things would've been more cohesive.

    A few things with Sabretooth weren't resolved properly or clearly enough.

    I guess Deadpool isn't coming back for that spin off. What the heck? Wolvie chopped his head off! This doesn't make sense. Deadpool was alive and well with his own series after Weapon X. That's quite a liberty they took.

    This movie definatly did not suck like everyone online says it did. I think it suffered from brash fast cut editing and a mediocre script.

    8 1/2 out of 10 points.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 03, 2009 4:51:24 AM CDT

    If I don't get a free ticket I'm not reviewing it either!

    by potatino

    If I don't get a free ticket I'm not reviewing it either!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 03, 2009 3:47:13 PM CDT

    87 Million...

    by big_dumb_bunny

    Well, looks like the general public just proved Rothman correct, you can pretty much sell any piece of shit to stupid people. I was just over at Superhero Hype and according to their poll most people think Wolverine was between a 7 and a 10, which I find astounding. Well looks like we can all look forward to seeing giant turds like X-Men: First Class 1,2 and 3, X-Men Origins: Magneto (which should kick ass, but won't) and the Deadpool spinoff, which will also suck huge dirty balls. Yay.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 03, 2009 3:48:20 PM CDT

    Mark my words

    by anything but tangerines

    After an 88 mil weekend, and even though it will drop like a stone next week, Wolverine will leave a lasting impression on big action films. Sometime this month, a "bad" but full copy of Transformers 2 will be "accidentally" leaked out. Mark my words.

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 03, 2009 3:50:09 PM CDT

    May or June

    by anything but tangerines

    mark my words

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 03, 2009 3:59:44 PM CDT

    63 percent drop next week

    by supercowbell4therequestformorecowbell

    even if it doesnt drop badly, i dont care it still sucks dick

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 03, 2009 9:40:08 PM CDT

    Much Ado...

    by icemonkey

    First of all, who cares about what the percentage is at Rotten Tomato's? And as mush as I like this site, who really cares about what is said here? This is all for entertainment and we all take ourselves a little too seriously sometimes. OK, most of the time. Is Wolverine the best movie ever made? Nope. Is it the best comic book movie ever made? No sir. What it is though is entertaining. The leads are all fantastic and the movie runs at a great clip. I have been reading X-Men comics for over 25 years and there is nothing in this movie that is so out of place that it made me lose faith in humanity. There are a lot of great scenes in this movie and they make up for a lot of the crap. Harry said he wasn't really interested in the Wolverine origin story but there was nowhere else for this movie to go. They had just spent the better part of three films trying to make everyone wonder why Wolvie has metal blades and why he can't remember his past. I thought those questions were answered nicely and a little better than they were in the half-asses Origins comic on which this is partly based. Personally I think Ryan Reynolds is a very good Deadpool and Taylor Kitsch was charismatic as Gambit. They would both do well with larger character arcs. Liev Schrieber was awesome as Sabretooth and Jackman was his normal terrific Wolverine. Do I like this version of Emma Frost? No, but it sucked in the comic too. They didn't make it up for the movie. If you count this as the 4th in the X-Men franchise then I would rank it second behind X-2. All in all, it was fun. Why does it have to be more than that?

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 05, 2009 2:07:27 AM CDT

    Don't trust any AICN reviews of Wolverine

    by movie_grinder

    They're inclined to focus on the bad stuff in the movie, just because they didn't get invited to the press-screening and Harry is too cheap to pay for a ticket himself. I saw the movie yesterday - it's a a good movie! Not as good as X2 but better than X3, and it certainly playes its role as a tone-setting prequel better than any of the Star Wars movies did!

    Reply to Talkback

  • May 06, 2009 5:20:38 AM CDT

    Wolverine

    by stoncold72

    I wish the 'smart marks' could leave the movie alone for just a second. Unfortunately, I read all the pre-hype from this site. Normally, I agree with most opinions from the contributors to the site. Thus, I was let down before I saw the movie. Nonetheless, my kids would not be deterred. We went and LOVED IT!!!! My 3 year old was immatating the Wolverine battle scenes. My 5 year old twin girls were fascinated. My teens were completely entertained(as were we). Which led to this undeniable fact. Todays kids don't really read comics. We did(we do)!!! This reboot of the franchises in marvel or dc are not for us its for them. So we can find them lacking(as did our parents opinion of our comic book reading material) or we can just accept that creativity of our day does not evolve as well as we would like into todays medium. There are exceptions to the rule(see Iron Man) but we should be thankful our kid will share our legacy. Didn't we just share Dragonball Z. Have some mercy!!!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback