|
Published on Tuesday, March 17, 2009 - 12:29am |
|
Machinegunrap Gets Unstuck With THE TIME TRAVELER'S WIFE!
|
A delay in the release of a movie is rarely a harbinger of quality, but when it comes to a tricky piece of material like Audrey Niffenegger's THE TIME TRAVELER'S WIFE, all of that extra time might be necessary to test and re-test the picture in order to nail down the tone. Then again, in reading the well-reasoned review posted below, I can't help but recall Neil LaBute's film of A.S. Byatt's POSSESSION - a smart, respectful adaptation that, despite a year-plus in the editing room, failed to capture the heart of the novel.
When Bruce Joel Rubin (of GHOST and the great JACOB'S LADDER) was hired to adapt THE TIME TRAVELER'S WIFE, I thought this might be the next ENGLISH PATIENT. It had a savvy team of producers (most notably Plan B's Brad Pitt and Brad Grey), a pair of actors on the verge of stardom (Rachel McAdams and Eric Bana), and a love story that's a John Barry score away from cinematic immortality. All of the elements were there (well, save for Barry, but Mychael Danna's no slouch); it just needed a deft hand behind the camera.
Was German director Robert Schwentke - who recently went Hollywood with the formula thriller FLIGHTPLAN - that guy? Let's see what Machinegunrap has to say...
Time travel has long been a baffling fringe thought of science
fiction. Time is an ever flowing continuum, seemingly impossible to
stop. The subject has been explored in countless forms of media,
visual, written and I’m sure aural (there are always books on tape).
Ray Bradbury’s novel, “A Sound of Thunder” is the examination I’m most
familiar with, if only because of “The Simpsons.” This takes the idea
that if one were to travel back in time and alter just one miniature
detail, it could have disastrous effect on the future. It was turned
into an unwatchable film with Ben Kingsley and Ed Burns a few years
ago. The misplacement of something in the past affecting the future
has no place in The Time Traveler’s Wife. As its title would suggest,
this film takes the scientific thought to a romantic level.
A car crash when he was six years old was the first instance in which
Henry DeTamble (Eric Bana) had been exposed to his time travel
ability. He’s visited by his elder self, telling him the crash is
nothing to worry about. This is presumably to just calm the younger
Henry down, as his mom is killed in the crash, usually something one
would worry about. The time-traveled Henry then dissipates, fleeing
the scene, leaving the young one to deal with the tragedy at hand. A
few rules to this time travel story are established in the quick
scene. Henry travels back to times only in which he’s already been
born. His travel location is only to where his younger self is
present. When he travels, anything he’s wearing stays in the present
and he must immediately seek clothing to cover his nudity in the past.
Lastly, he has no control over when his current self travels and when
he ends up.
Clare Abshire (Rachel McAdams) is the chronological constant in the
story and as her age progresses, so do the details of the story, for
the most part. Around college age, she stumbles upon Henry working in
a library. She recognizes him, but he fails to recognize her. She
tells him he told her he’d react that way when they met again. She
first encountered Henry’s time traveling ability when she was a young
girl, setting up a picnic for herself on her family’s vast property.
She immediately takes a liking to him and he vows to continue to visit
her. She of course tests his claim of being able to travel through
time by asking about the future. His dematerialization in front of her
helps make her a believer.
Once Henry and Clare meet up again in the present tense of the story,
they fall immediately in love and get married, even with Clare’s
knowledge of how difficult his inability to be constantly present may
pose problems for them in the future. She chooses to looks past this
caveat, but it rapidly becomes an issue when he travels on their
wedding night, even leaving his wedding ring behind. Like any couple,
they face trials and tribulations, with Henry’s involuntary extended
stays away from her only adding to the frustration. The question
becomes if the romance they’ve maintained through the course of
decades is enough to carry them into future happiness.
The Time Traveler’s Wife is based on a novel of the same name by
Audrey Niffenegger. I’ve never read, nor heard of it, so any
discussion of how the film adheres to the source material coming from
me, would be fruitless. The script, written by Bruce Joel Rubin
(Ghost), is itself a decent one. Given his past credits, it’s obvious
he was a great choice for a romantic film set between two people who
are only sometimes together. The romance that ensues between Henry and
Clare, although a bit forced by Henry’s traveling back in time,
meeting with Clare (did she really have a choice in the matter?), is a
love that resembles most relationships, but becomes a bit supernatural
in the elements it faces. There are times I felt the film defied its
own logic, with Henry always traveling to where another version of
himself seems to be, but yet appears in Clare’s bushes for some
reason. Perhaps it was time travel destiny for “star-cross’d lovers.”
There’s also a connection made between Clare’s father and Henry, which
proves important, that I have a feeling was a big part of the novel,
but here is treated as pure coincidence.
As the titular character, Rachel McAdams is essentially the main
protagonist, even if it’s not her whose genetic defect grants the
burden of traveling through time. The film seems a bit too focused on
Eric Bana, since he possesses the oddball character trait. It would
have been a slightly different movie if the focus was on McAdams’
character, and perhaps a more interesting one. Since this is a movie
and we’re to be dazzled by the visual, the time traveling aspect gets
a bit too much play. The film straddles the fence when it should have
leaned a bit more one way. McAdams is playing closer to her age, and I
think she’s become an engaging actress who can carry more weight in
the not-too-distant future. I like Bana, but fear he might not end up
the A-list talent Hollywood has tried to mold him into. The scales are
tipped toward McAdams here, in terms of acting prowess.
Director Robert Schwentke (Flightplan) does an admirable job keeping
the story cohesive and comprehendible, which is always a tricky
proposition when playing with time. He’s not much of a visual stylist,
but manages to keep the story moving without any true lulls within.
Although perhaps jarring at first, Henry’s fading away when on the
verge of leaving current time and space, is a neat effect that’s able
to create the sense of longing Clare feels, having to watch him slowly
drift from her presence.
P.S. I Love You and The Lake House are two movies that came to mind
when viewing this, and although I know they aren’t necessarily time
travel love stories, the longing of having a love you aren’t exactly
able to hold on to was resonant throughout this film. I haven’t
actually seen the former movies for myself (having no desire), so I’m
not quite sure what kind of quality bar has been set for the time
travel love affair genre. I felt good about The Time Traveler’s Wife
immediately finishing it, due to the romantic relationship, but there
are a few nagging script issues that came to light which I think draw
it down a notch or two. If only they could go back in time and fix it,
a better product might materialize.
Machinegunrap
TheFilmNest.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
The book is so good... by Lucasblows | Mar 17th, 2009 12:36:03 AM | My mom and wife loved this
book... by ErnestBorgNine | Mar 17th, 2009 12:37:10 AM | The book is one of my
favorites... by bb6634 | Mar 17th, 2009 12:43:31 AM | This book hooked me. by gotilk | Mar 17th, 2009 12:57:00 AM | The book is pretty good
(elipsis) by palooka_boy | Mar 17th, 2009 12:57:42 AM | That review made me bleed from
the ears... by shellfishh | Mar 17th, 2009 01:04:22 AM | "It's a book for women who
don't like sci-fi" by tomdolan04 | Mar 17th, 2009 01:28:04 AM | I saw this back in October by IndustryKiller! | Mar 17th, 2009 01:36:39 AM | I can't really see... by tomdolan04 | Mar 17th, 2009 01:45:40 AM | Test 1 2 3 by Motoko Kusanagi | Mar 17th, 2009 01:48:06 AM | Freaky! by Aloy | Mar 17th, 2009 02:38:59 AM | '..but yet appears in Clares
bushes for some reason....' by SISKOKID | Mar 17th, 2009 02:50:16 AM | "his inability to be
constantly present" by ShadowMaker | Mar 17th, 2009 03:11:55 AM | Journeyman by Mr_X | Mar 17th, 2009 03:26:20 AM | terrible review by thinboyslim. | Mar 17th, 2009 03:46:05 AM | Agreed. Crap review. by Dubster32 | Mar 17th, 2009 03:48:18 AM | It'll never be as good as the
book by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 04:42:30 AM | UNFILMABLE! by Rolling_Stone | Mar 17th, 2009 06:23:24 AM | ending reshoot? by thinboyslim. | Mar 17th, 2009 06:26:12 AM | I'm dying to read the book. by David Lazarus Long | Mar 17th, 2009 06:36:05 AM | What about Ron Livingston by RobFromBackEast | Mar 17th, 2009 06:50:32 AM | I read the book by red_weed | Mar 17th, 2009 06:53:34 AM | actually... by Dollar Bird | Mar 17th, 2009 06:57:54 AM | My wife loved this book by walrusholder | Mar 17th, 2009 07:07:10 AM | What about the Violent Femmes by walrusholder | Mar 17th, 2009 07:12:01 AM | REPLAY - Best romantic
time-travel book. FACT! by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 07:24:30 AM | I just want to say... by The Amazing G | Mar 17th, 2009 07:26:04 AM | Ron Livingston by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 07:28:18 AM | For once, the time travel and
romance work TOGETHER by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 07:30:55 AM | Replay by Ken Grimwood! by chiwrtr72 | Mar 17th, 2009 07:42:06 AM | The best part is when he's 15
and by chrth | Mar 17th, 2009 07:43:32 AM | In the book, I should say. I
strongly suspect it by chrth | Mar 17th, 2009 07:43:52 AM | I love how REPLAY ends by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 07:51:18 AM | Some Sound of Thunder Visual
Concepts by zinc_chameleon | Mar 17th, 2009 07:55:28 AM | Sooo whats the plot? by Charlie_Allnut | Mar 17th, 2009 08:16:53 AM | I love how he compares it to
movies he hasnt seen by Crow3711 | Mar 17th, 2009 08:19:25 AM | Casting is pretty solid by Lobster Johnson | Mar 17th, 2009 08:22:23 AM | Terrible Review by ForkTongue | Mar 17th, 2009 08:34:52 AM | Anyone ever notice the wird
novel title trend... by FlickaPoo | Mar 17th, 2009 08:58:14 AM | FlickaPoo by LoneGun | Mar 17th, 2009 09:07:37 AM | Awesome, heartbreaking book... by sapno_krei | Mar 17th, 2009 09:15:23 AM | they should make a movie
called by Jesiah | Mar 17th, 2009 09:18:09 AM | replay by Moshi | Mar 17th, 2009 09:23:28 AM | So it's Benjamin Button with
time travelling? by ricarleite | Mar 17th, 2009 09:23:46 AM | Good book! by DoctorZoidberg | Mar 17th, 2009 09:25:49 AM | Best Romantic Time-Travel
Story by TheMarineBiologist | Mar 17th, 2009 09:40:22 AM | Without spoiling anything...
(I hope) by sapno_krei | Mar 17th, 2009 09:41:49 AM | TheMarineBiologist by sapno_krei | Mar 17th, 2009 09:44:37 AM | People who think the book is
only for females by Lovecraftfan | Mar 17th, 2009 09:47:17 AM | I really liked the book by WeAreNotAmused | Mar 17th, 2009 09:53:45 AM | sapno_krei by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 09:54:07 AM | TheMarineBiologist by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 09:57:40 AM | Frakking Fantastic Book by geektastic | Mar 17th, 2009 10:02:01 AM | It's not so much "sneaking
suspicion"... by TheMarineBiologist | Mar 17th, 2009 10:16:24 AM | Bana is a crazy good actor.
Underrated. by dr sauch | Mar 17th, 2009 10:20:20 AM | dr sauch by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 10:36:43 AM | a massively overrated book. by Kizeesh | Mar 17th, 2009 10:40:38 AM | Is there a release date yet? by dirtsandwich | Mar 17th, 2009 10:48:13 AM | Put more science in? by spud mcspud | Mar 17th, 2009 10:50:21 AM | The guy gives his younger self
a hand job? by liljuniorbrown | Mar 17th, 2009 10:58:58 AM | Journey Man was great by RainesMaker | Mar 17th, 2009 11:00:44 AM | The self-sex scene by Kizeesh | Mar 17th, 2009 11:05:10 AM | The self-sex scene by chrth | Mar 17th, 2009 11:17:48 AM | "There's always books on
tape"? by gavdiggity | Mar 17th, 2009 11:48:06 AM | No mention of Somewhere in
Time? by skimn | Mar 17th, 2009 12:14:58 PM | I havn't read the book by liljuniorbrown | Mar 17th, 2009 01:54:45 PM | Reviewer by Wee Willie | Mar 17th, 2009 02:18:28 PM | liljuniorbrown: They were both
the same age (15) by chrth | Mar 17th, 2009 02:19:34 PM | I loved Somewhere In Time by dirtsandwich | Mar 17th, 2009 02:31:17 PM | 1978CreepyThinMan by sapno_krei | Mar 17th, 2009 02:47:46 PM | 1978CreepyThinMan vanishes by CHRISTIAN_BALE_TRASHED_MY_LIGH
TS | Mar 17th, 2009 03:11:33 PM | This book was horrible. by Homer Sexual | Mar 17th, 2009 03:14:10 PM | Journeyman ripoff!! by oisin5199 | Mar 17th, 2009 05:07:49 PM | Overrated? by sapno_krei | Mar 17th, 2009 05:49:26 PM | sapno_krei by TheMarineBiologist | Mar 17th, 2009 06:24:28 PM | The book was great by drewsdad27us | Mar 17th, 2009 07:48:39 PM | Just asking... by Kid Z | Mar 17th, 2009 08:54:05 PM | i smell by frank cotton | Mar 17th, 2009 09:58:25 PM | Kid Z by Dollar Bird | Mar 17th, 2009 10:46:45 PM | noncents by spud mcspud | Mar 18th, 2009 04:04:24 AM | I feel two ways about the book by muffin_buffalo | Mar 18th, 2009 05:01:42 AM | Eric Bana "on the verge of
stardom" by Wormie1 | Mar 18th, 2009 05:22:16 AM | Dollar Bird... by Kid Z | Mar 18th, 2009 07:35:14 AM | drewsdad27us by Dubster32 | Mar 18th, 2009 09:07:09 AM | Dean Koontz - Lightning by Dubster32 | Mar 18th, 2009 09:08:12 AM | Was wondering what happened to
this one by Silverhour | Mar 18th, 2009 11:03:13 AM | Trailers - WHAT FUCKING
TRAILERS! by dirtsandwich | Mar 18th, 2009 11:47:04 AM | Changing time by Kizeesh | Mar 18th, 2009 12:49:23 PM | HULK SMASH TIME TRAVEL!!! by MrMysteryGuest | Mar 18th, 2009 12:49:58 PM | Did somebody say time travel? by Orcus | Mar 18th, 2009 01:48:14 PM | So you've read it chrth? by liljuniorbrown | Mar 18th, 2009 06:38:05 PM | The novel... by symphy | Mar 18th, 2009 07:07:38 PM | liljuniorbrown: Yes I've read
it by chrth | Mar 18th, 2009 07:45:07 PM | Pish. by Kizeesh | Mar 18th, 2009 07:54:37 PM | Kizeesh by spud mcspud | Mar 19th, 2009 09:21:36 AM | One of the best books i've
read in a while by Stormshadow4life | Jun 8th, 2009 08:56:38 AM |
|
|