Logo

Cool News

Surprise STAR TREK Icons To Turn Up In Abrams’ Movie???

Published at:  Mar 03, 2009 1:54:09 AM CST

SPOILER ALERT !!




I am – Hercules!!


Latino Review covered last weekend's WonderCon panel with IDW Comics (publisher of the terrific “Countdown” prequel/sequel to J.J. Abrams' upcoming “Star Trek” movie), and it looks like the participation of Jean-Luc Picard, Data and possibly other “Next Generation” icons may not be limited to the funnybooks:

"The end of issue 4 is a cliffhanger and is going to continue in the first few minutes of the movie."

Right after that was said, another writer (or artist) said that part of the movie will take place with the Next Generation crew and to look out for that. Another guy on the panel gave him a quick "uh oh" look and smiled.

After that, someone from the audience asked "So are members of the Next Generation cast in the new Trek movie?" to which the same guy replied, "I really cannot say anything about that."


If true? Best news I’ve heard all week! (Can’t wait to see how well the CGI takes out 60-year-old Brent Spiner’s wrinkles!)

This news reminds me that William Shatner and George Takei were visited by writer-director Abrams just prior to the announcement of Abrams' involvement in the new “Star Trek” movie, which hits U.S. cinemas May 8 (just two months and six days from right now!).

Find all of Latino Review’s story on the matter (plus video of the apparent slip) here.



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:24:21 AM CST

    FIRST

    by guntermonkey

    For the first time! No longer a virgin!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:25:04 AM CST

    FIRST!

    by nohubris

    First time for everything.:-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:26:06 AM CST

    Turns out, it's Barclay!

    by shadowhawk

    And he's really nervous to meet Nero!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:26:21 AM CST

    You stupid bitches

    by white goodman

    I feel bad for you NoHubris. I'm still laughing my ass off, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:26:49 AM CST

    And the icon will be...

    by guntermonkey

    Character Lily Sloane from First Contact! "You broke your little ships..."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:27:11 AM CST

    FIFTH!!!

    by bonecrushersmith

    this is good news, bring on Picard.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:27:26 AM CST

    Well, almost

    by nohubris

    If ST:TNG is in the movie that changes things for the better IMHO, since it is a "time travel" saga.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:27:43 AM CST

    Missed it by that much, NoHubris

    by guntermonkey

    Better luck next time... ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:28:02 AM CST

    THIS SOUNDS LIKE A BAD IDEA

    by mullah omar

    If you are going to reinvent something, just do it and don't look back. Trying to shoehorn old characters into this will just be clumsy. Don't give us winks and nods, give us innovation.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:28:59 AM CST

    WE NEED THE ROCKET MAN!

    by iron-kong

    I just Shatnered!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:29:26 AM CST

    Still have hope that Shatner will cameo

    by v'shael

    Like an after-the-credits Nick-Fury like appearance.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:29:53 AM CST

    White Goodman

    by nohubris

    I'm laughing too, White Goodman.That's what I get for slow login. :-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:31:18 AM CST

    I hear V'ger is also making a cameo

    by guntermonkey

    And if you don't know about V'ger, you're too young to be on this website, or in a Star Trek talkback in general...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:36:16 AM CST

    No DS9 Cameo...

    by nohubris

    ...or is Worf a twofer?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:38:28 AM CST

    Already debunked

    by divisionpost

    http://tinyurl.com/bnczmc - From TrekMovie.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:39:13 AM CST

    wow, Spiner is 60? sounds cool anyway.

    by bmacsmith

    something to tie it together, and NG deserves mention.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:43:16 AM CST

    Shatner will have a cameo

    by heckles

    Believe it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:46:44 AM CST

    not a Star Trek fan...can someone explain this?

    by badmrwonka

    did the Next Generation crew come after the original? or concurrently? how does this work?if this is a reboot of the original franchise, how can the next generation appear?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:48:35 AM CST

    Thanks, GunterMonkey

    by nohubris

    But I handled it like a MAN rather than what W. Goodman said.Anyhow, since you're so civil and cordial, I certainly don't mind being the JONAS BROS to your MADEA GOES TO JAIL (i.e. this weekend's box office race).:-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:52:59 AM CST

    BadMrWonka

    by burnhollywood

    Time travel. Next to bad-ass robots, it is to movie and TV what ScriptGirl's big titties are to talkbacks.
    That's why DR. WHO is the best show on TV, BTW...he has two different flavors of robot baddies, and time travels like a mother-fucker.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:55:45 AM CST

    This one just nuked the shark (or whatever)

    by citizen sane

    This does not bode well for the franchise. The bigget draw is the fresh start. Now it may end up having the same lame vibe as ALL OF THE NEXT GENERATION MOVIES!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:57:12 AM CST

    Best news yet

    by neodevilbanex

    since the announcement of Nimoy. This actually has me a little excited.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:00:10 AM CST

    That Picard is scaring me...

    by burnhollywood

    ...Like he really wants me to accept that cake with a woman going to the bathroom on it, and he's not taking "no" for an answer this time...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:05:04 AM CST

    Burn...

    by champvinyl

    No you see, your clothes fell off and, well, it didn't matter then because Mr.Stewart... he saw everything.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:20:12 AM CST

    Good God No... I just lost all excitment for this movie.

    by nathan0774

    I hope this is not true. I will lose all excitment for this movie. If he is cramming a bunch of cameos than he should have made room room Shatner. Otherwise leave all TNG actors at home! Please!!!!! Those were the worst!!! They will kill this movie!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:21:12 AM CST

    Shatner probably refused when it was just a cameo

    by performingmonkey

    I'm guessing he said give me the same screentime as Nimoy and I'll do it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:22:53 AM CST

    I doubt it

    by lockesbrokenleg

    Most of the cast is doing other projects, and I'm sure something would have slipped by now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:32:18 AM CST

    Re: That Picard

    by lochkray

    "Like he really wants me to accept that cake with a woman going to the bathroom on it". Burnhollywood takes the cake for the most obscure reference I've read in a talkbalk in a long time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:32:22 AM CST

    Picard returning? make it so!

    by newc0253

    there, that's my inner trekkie expressed for the month.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:34:10 AM CST

    Part of the movie takes place in the TNG era

    by lockesbrokenleg

    but we don't see any TNG cast members.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:47:34 AM CST

    All starting to sound silly and contrived!

    by neilf

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:11:40 AM CST

    The comic prequel

    by penhapus

    is filling in the gaps for the geeks that the film can't; you want to see Picard and Data involved? Go buy the funny books because they won't be in the movie

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:18:07 AM CST

    It's a reboot! Honest! Hey new fans come back!

    by reelheed

    Oh dear. Well thats fucked that right in the ear then. Thanks internets.

    Reply to Talkback

  • That all this time, he always DID have a cameo in the film?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:20:04 AM CST

    If some of TNG crew like Picard and Data show up...

    by theghostwholurks

    This movie WILL be a hit! Not that it wasn't going to be anyway, but it certainly makes ME more excited to see the film and will DEFINITELY get my Dad excited when I force him to see the movie on the big screen. Although he's an old-school sci-fi fan (i.e. likes Asimov and Heinlein, but wouldn't be caught DEAD at a convention), like most retirees, he mainly gets excited by the Weather Channel and rarely goes to the movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:20:21 AM CST

    *smokescreen, that would be

    by theseeker7

    The Shatner drama was a SMOKESCREEN.

    The subject line of the talkbacks should really be setup like where it simply won't allow you to add any more characters if that's the point where the display is gonna end anyway.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:30:55 AM CST

    As DivisionPost said...

    by deafpoet

    already debunked by TrekMovie.com. Wouldn't worry about getting your panties in a twist about it. I'm sure the story from the comics carries right into the film but I wouldn't count on seeing any TNG characters in there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:31:50 AM CST

    Engage!

    by light_tweaker

    Bring on Picard, and Data. I fucking love TNG. Can't believe Spiner is 60...jesus christ the time flies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:05:35 AM CST

    Look, theSeeker7, if you are going to complain then you can just

    by wickedjacob

    So there!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:11:11 AM CST

    Trekmovie.com says no TNG peeps

    by heckles

    So settle down. Breath. That's better.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:23:16 AM CST

    Hopefully it's not just a shot of the Enterprise-E

    by photoboy

    That would be a bit naff if it's just a shot of the starship and perhaps a voice over from a couple of the characters.

    If Abrams really has put Picard & Co into the movie then my interest has suddenly shot back up from zero to maybe seeing this in the cinema.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:34:29 AM CST

    Commie Books

    by thejake

    I've read the first two issues of "Countdown" and so far, so good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:35:01 AM CST

    Bad Mr Wonka

    by united states

    Assuming you are serious, the original series came first, Next Generation was some 75 years afterward. DS9 was somewhat concurrent with the last couple of seasons of Next Generation, and Voyager began its journey as DS9 was winding down. Enterprise is a "prequel" series, taking place 100 years prior to Kirk taking command of his ship. Its biggest failure was that, rather than exploring a robust Trek back story, they toyed and tinkered with the history a bit, and ignored major events such as the first two Fed/Klingon wars. Bacula is perfect as the captain, and the show had many positive points, but the whole concept was not handled properly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:35:16 AM CST

    Countdown comics 1 and 2 sold out already!

    by lostbat

    so they didn't print enough issues for us. Thank god that some people were happy to share on the torrent networks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:37:23 AM CST

    New Movie

    by united states

    I still have serious doubts about this movie. J.J. can't decide if its a reboot or a nostalgic revisiting. The whole concept of changing the canon, and saying they are not, is ridiculous.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:42:39 AM CST

    Nope. Not happening.

    by bones

    Outside of Spock, no characters previously seen in the 24th century will be present. This news item is just there to get Next Gen fans into the theater...so, you know, fall for it if you must, but don't go in expecting something that isn't there and complain afterwards. There are enough of us complaining before the movie comes out.
    It would be interesting to do a poll to see how many people are actually interested in the movie and see if it changes as it gets closer to May...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:45:35 AM CST

    There are always possibilities......

    by everybodycomestoricks

    Many different people have said there is more in this movie then just what the previews show. If it is a time travel story and it begins twenty years after Nemisis why not have a few of the Next Gen cast. It would be nice to see Stewart as Picard one last time. Perhaps this will all undo the needless death of Kirk in Generations and that will bring back Shatner as Kirk in the end.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:48:58 AM CST

    how can the presence of next gen characters

    by famouseccles

    improve or as TheGhostWhoLurks claims make this a hit when their own trek movies stink

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:52:40 AM CST

    bakula was a shit captain

    by famouseccles

  • Mar 03, 2009 4:55:22 AM CST

    EverybodycomestoRicks

    by famouseccles

    i've been waiting for them undo the death of Kirk since 1994

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 6:11:41 AM CST

    EverybodycomestoRick's...

    by bones

    To bring Shatner back at the end would be silly, seeing as how Paramount wants this to be a new franchise of films.
    So, this won't erase Kirk's death--and it might not even guarantee more Trek...and even if it does, it will only be with this new cast doing their new thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 6:13:44 AM CST

    POILE

    by mr. lahey

    Beware of poile in this article.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 6:14:28 AM CST

    IF TRUE IT WOULD BE LIKE THIS:

    by doctorzoidberg

    Before evil Bana from the future warps back to the past, the Enterprise E with Captain Data, and Admiral Picard trying to stop him, then letting Spock know so he can go back in time as well. What I don't get is how lame-ass B4 can now be identified as Data despite the transfer of all his memory engrams (from the inferior Nemesis)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 6:36:33 AM CST

    trekmovie.com debunked this one

    by yackbacker

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:04:05 AM CST

    dont worry TNG fans

    by bouncy x

    the whole cast (wesley and yar included) will be appearing on family guy at the end of the month.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:16:40 AM CST

    The most exciting news since admiral Janeway in Nemesis

    by bendersshinyass

    Look, It didn't work for Next generation. And it did nothing for Nemesis. At least they had the balls to cut it out of Insurrection. Trek is so much more than just nods to the fans and trying to get everyone from the shows in on the big screen action. Next gen should be making TV movies. Ds9 too. Voyager has seen her day. that said, I really hope we get to see Spock hitching a ride with Sulu on the excelsior

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:20:36 AM CST

    How is 60 years after Nemesis still the TNG Era?

    by georgieboy

    It's not. It's the NEXT Next NEXT Generation era.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:25:52 AM CST

    Well since Abrams Trek...

    by kid z

    ...is supposedly an in an alternate timeline created when Tattoed Bruce Banner Romulan destroys Vulcan, I suppose the Next Gen cameo will go like so... The 24th Century. Establishing shot: On the bridge of the NCC-1701-C. Captain Picard: Data, set a course for Farpoint Station. Data Aye-aye Captain. Strange... Captain, sensors have detected an unusual phenomenon headed in out direction. Picard: Explain. Data: It seems to be some sort of chronal distortion wave. It has increased in speed. Now 100 hundred kilometers away, 50 kilometers... Picard Prepare to r.... Crazy light effects, fade to black. ...And no more Next Generation/Deep Space Nine, and Voyager in JJ Abrams' dojo.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:33:09 AM CST

    relax. it's just wil wheaton.

    by zom-bot.com

    and it turns out this new movie is all just a dream wesley was having after reading about the exploits of the TOS crew....lol

    Reply to Talkback

  • I think it would be cool to see Picard or Data trying to stop Nero before he time travels. If not, no biggie!

    But I still believe this is a huge marketing ploy. I think they are trying to hide Shatner's cameo to make the big "holy shit" part of the movie. Deny, deny, deny and a little more denying and all of the sudden... Abrams/Shatner tricked us and it was a great surprise.

    Or I could be completely wrong!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:53:24 AM CST

    Ride the Wave

    by beyondstatic

    I'm all for the TNG cast in the film. Honestly I always preferred TNG to TOS, but that was my generation of TV. (though I have grown to love TOS on DVD, and am definately going to see the new film.)

    But seriously, how many times can we do a Star Trek film about a time distortion, a wrinkle in time, or some sort of ribbon of time. It's been done... far too often in the Trek films. Can't we come up with a better idea for the next one?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:14:49 AM CST

    I like fan service like this.

    by rbatty024

    It shows the filmmakers actually care about the hardcore audience.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:16:50 AM CST

    So Spiner is playing Data's retard brother again?

    by spyguy

    Remember, Data was destroyed in NEMESIS, so unless this is a wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey thing, I call bullshit on Spiner's involvement.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:20:50 AM CST

    @ SpyGuy

    by beelkay

    No, in the second comic Data says they were able to overlay his neural nets onto B4 or whatever. It would be cool if Picard and Data show up in cameos in the movie, I think.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:33:50 AM CST

    Hercules, why even post this??

    by alan_moore

    Trekmovie.com is THE source for Trek movie news. Roberto Orci and others regularly give Anthony Pascale over there the inside scoop, and this rumor was debunked days ago. There are NO TNG cameos. Or Shatner, sadly, though they damn well SHOULD have had him in there. The Shat was correct, it IS stupid that he was excluded. We old school fans are getting a bone thrown our way in the form of Nimoy, and that's it. Sad to think about it, but his appearance may well mark the final time any character from the "prime" timeline ever shows up again. It's all new universe from here on out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:38:57 AM CST

    A Stewart cameo

    by bizarrojerry

    That couldn't be a bad thing. I mean, it may not help the movie, but I don't think it could hurt it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:39:02 AM CST

    This needs to be repeated from above

    by richievanderlow

    It's B.S. and isn't happening. TNG era yes, TNG cast, no. So settle down you wishful thinkers. Suits me that its not happening.. it would probably come off as too gimicky.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:40:17 AM CST

    As much as I love TNG

    by marillion

    and the fanboy in me is giddy with the thought of having a bit of TNG in the new movie... I think this is a bad idea.

    Having Spock is great.. A great way to tie in with the past, but to muddle things up with having TNG cameos takes away from this being a new look at the franchise.

    Kirk's involvement with "Generations" was a wasted opportunity. The role, while a cool "passing of the torch" was needless.

    JJ should have used this as a way to relaunch his vision, not bog it down with references to the past (or the future, as it were).

    That said, I'll still be in line because I'm Star Trek's bitch... (at least I'm honest about it!!)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:40:31 AM CST

    How TNG cast could be in it

    by bizarrojerry

    Because, it seems that the "modern day" Spock played by Nimoy would be from the TNG or post-TNG era where he was last seen on an episode of the series.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:40:42 AM CST

    Alan Moore

    by richievanderlow

    As much as I would've loved to have the Shat make an appearance, Braga, Moore & Co. already killed him off.. how do you suppose they would bring him back and make it not seem like a gimmick?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:42:19 AM CST

    My guess is that if there is a cameo then...

    by rbatty024

    it will be Stewart, and not Spinner. Even non-geeks know Patrick Stewart, but only Star Trek geeks, like myself, know who the hell Spinner is. I welcome the cameo, but we will see if it happens. They might have decided they wanted to make a clean break with little baggage from other series, even the good ones.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:44:23 AM CST

    Shatner in the movie ...

    by darth_valinorean

    Is anyone really surprised? That over the top exchange of wanting to be in the movie, wanting him in the movie, a misunderstanding, deliberate release of Nimoy in the trailer to trip the fans even more than Shatner is not in the movie! COME ON!!! WE ARE STAR TREK FANS. WE ARE THE LEGIONS OF GEEKDOM!! You still believe there are no other surprises? Come on now! This is from the guy who gave us LOST and FRINGE and ALIAS.

    Use your brains or don't get on the talkbacks with the junk

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:44:46 AM CST

    About Generations...

    by rbatty024

    It is actually a good movie if you can ignore the shoehorning of the older series. Shatner was wasted potential and absolutely unnecessary. Alex from A Clockwork Orange was a pretty sweet villain, though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:55:00 AM CST

    If these guys were really in it, we'd know.

    by rev_skarekroe

    You can't keep this kind of stuff a secret these days. Some catering guy would've been all over the internet saying he served pizza rolls to Patrick Stewart on the set of the new Trek movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:57:33 AM CST

    It's Not True

    by alen smithee

    So says Trek Movie

    http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/01/rumor-control-no-tng-cameos-in-new-star-trek-movie/

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:00:58 AM CST

    And about the comics...

    by alan_moore

    They are ok, I especially appreciate the elderly Spock/Nero backstory, but they have their dodgy elements as well. Spock is the ambassador FROM Vulcan and Picard is the ambassador TO Vulcan? Ok. That doesn't seem contrived. And isn't ambassador to Vulcan a bit of a low key job for a man (Picard) who was the greatest Starfleet hero of his time? He may as well have taken a part-time job sacking at Kroger. He should be running Starfleet by this point, or be President of the UFP. What suddenly made him an expert on Vulcan society? Even ambassador to the Klingon empire would've made more sense, based on what we saw in TNG. Finally, these comics don't take place "decades after Nemesis." A few years at most; in issue #2 Picard hasn't aged a day since we last saw him.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:02:28 AM CST

    Replace Brent Spiner with Jason Dohring

    by squashua

    Separated at birth by 25-30 years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:24:36 AM CST

    Really?

    by falcon5768

    Guys this was debunked like over a week ago. You guys REALLY need to update this site more.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:24:53 AM CST

    If Data shows up, I'll jizz my pants and explode.

    by dr sauch

    Truth. TNG is the best.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:31:18 AM CST

    Hey Alan_Moore... Picard Switched Minds With Spocks Dad

    by bojtrek

    Hey Alan_Moore, remember when Sarek was losing his mind and crying at Data's concert. Well, Picard swapped minds with Sarek or took his emotions... they did a mind-meld. So, maybe he is the perfect person for Vulcan society. And I agree he would be running Starfleet or something more important.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:52:43 AM CST

    New poster leaked: Link below

    by malicoire

    http://i43.tinypic.com/2elh9q9.jpg

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:54:51 AM CST

    LOL, this whole thing is starting to sound like a fanfic

    by terry1978

    Honestly, why not just incorporate Quark in a scene where he turns to the audience and is like, "my career was on the skids, so what can ya do?"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:57:55 AM CST

    BojTrek

    by alan_moore

    Good point recalling the mindmeld with Sarek. Still, Picard interacted with Klingons far more often, got involved in their politics, and was Worf's best friend. It would've been cool to see him as the ambassador to the Klingon empire, but I guess that wasn't convenient to the story they're telling in the comics.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:05:28 AM CST

    Whoever referenced Barclay---well done!

    by themark

    Officer Broccoli was always a bitch. I seriously think that having the TNG crew even cameo-ing is going to sell this to a whole mess of people. Hell, I just got off the phone with my mother (like many of you, we all had the Friday nights where the whole fam watched TNG) and her first comments were 'Don't tell me Picard's going to be in this, cause I don't want to see this...but will if they show up.' Weird devotion, eh? Oh and guys--saw Watchmen last night. This movie is NOT for fans of the book. Seriously. Having read Watchmen is going to diminish your enjoyment--you'll more than likely leave feeling kinda meh, just as I did.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:11:02 AM CST

    Real great, Herc

    by barrymore yorke

    Copying a days-old rumor from Latino Review that's already been debunked? Yeah, there's journalism. You should be ashamed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:11:28 AM CST

    HERES THE REAL DEAL RE: TNG ROLES

    by arcadian del sol

    Data appears in the movie but only in a 'hey look there's Data!' in a passing reference.
    Turns out that he was discovered during the TOS era, and he was held by Star Fleet for a long time for study before he developed a self-awareness (and Star Fleet granted him sentient rights), and then joined Star Fleet as a cadet.
    The only other cameo is that there is a young gardener in the background who is not named, but it is supposed to be Boothby, who was credited by Picard as 'the smartest man in the whole academy' and he encouraged young Wesley Crusher to find him and absorb all he can from him.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:13:41 AM CST

    Third unit guy, take a crew to Shatner's office.

    by kabong

    Rip a sequence of him that JarJar can paste into the beginning or end of the movie.

    We gotta shut those Trekker assholes up.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:15:37 AM CST

    Forget TNG Crew...

    by ericinwisconsin

    ...I want Pee Wee Hermann to have a cameo, preferably interacting with James "Mr. Barbara Streisand" Brolin.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:27:14 AM CST

    There .. are... four .. lights!!!

    by gotilk

    Stop getting pissed/excited/meh'd. It's established that they are not in the film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:34:38 AM CST

    then the Borg showed up and everything went to hell...

    by turketron

    motherfucking robuts...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:36:53 AM CST

    Man, Picard tooks creepy on that cover!

    by royston lodge

    Like an evil wizard or somethin'!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:37:32 AM CST

    Movie Will Flop Anyway

    by genrefanboy

    Strange how Nimoy was not at comic-con when he has such an important role according to the writers. And more strange that Nimoy has only been seen in 1 tiny trailer clip so far. Could it be that Nimoy hates the finished movie as it pees on his Trek era from a great height or could it be that Nimoy has such a small role (his poster credit is almost last) that they cannot show him until the movie is out. The mediocre director of MI3 is no Nick Meyer who can regenerate the franchise is he??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 11:03:32 AM CST

    I don't get it...

    by everythingeverywherestinks

    Since the die hard Trekkies are being forced to accept a new version of all things "Star Trek" (whether they want it or not) and Leonard Spock is making a cameo in the film (and thereby mooning any remaining fans of the original series with his wrinkled old arse hole), it seems to me that they ought to cram as many other Trek characters from every series as possible into the film, including the corpse of DeForest Kelly. I mean, it can't actually hurt the box office, right? This IS the "Star Trek" film that is supposed to finally get all the geeks out there laid, right? 'Cause, you know, this ain't your daddy's Trek, which means a bunch of stupid hawt cheerleaders will be there on May 8th waiting for ya, dood! So I say...RESHOOTS DAMMIT! Go do reshoots with more past Trek actor cameos! I want to see Chief O'Brien pop his head up out of the brig's retractable wall toilet!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 11:12:35 AM CST

    Chris Pine has Gayface - Movie will bomb

    by dick bahls

    They made a huge investment in this stinker - they have to be making in their pants now. This will be the big bomb of 2009.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 11:28:42 AM CST

    EverythingEverywhereStinks

    by carpet_pisser

    You better hope this doesn't bomb, because if it does, Trek is dead. For good. And it can't live off just the Trekkies anymore. Way too few to support feature films. I hope this is good, so that we can have more good Trek, but guess what, if it bombs, let it die. No Trek > Bad Trek

    Reply to Talkback

  • I hate you all. Especially genrefanboy and EverythingEverywhereStinks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 11:42:29 AM CST

    Trek isn't going anywhere

    by matineer

    if this show fails to exceed expectations. But it might become a reality show set aboard the real USS Enterprise -- gotta happen -- years from now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 11:45:54 AM CST

    AICN : Star Trek

    by aquatarkusman

    Potentially worse than the ESPN : Favre sycophantic relationship?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 12:20:50 PM CST

    why this is false: HERES THE REAL DEAL RE: TNG ROLES

    by xian042

    Not true because if Data was from ToS time than his creator would have been dead by the TNG years. But we see him in TNG, so Data and Lore were created long after ToS.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 12:52:00 PM CST

    The best reason for AICN coverage...

    by stunt vocalist 709

    of this is the talk back it generated.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:02:51 PM CST

    WESLEY CRUSHER SHOULD CAMEO

    by mr sulu

    old spock time travels back in his ship..then after gets up and stretches his legs and goes to change his pants and shirt into something more befitting TOS era and opens the cupboard to find WESLEY has hitched a ride!...."hiya Mr Spock!! Captain Picard has told me all about you!! did you used to know captain kirk?! and what was he like and.."

    camera then pans to outside ship and we hear a scream then a phaser sound...then we see Wesleys body being ejected out the ship...it expands then pops into crystalized bloody pieces

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:03:42 PM CST

    This is Bunk:

    by onebuckfilms

    http://trekmovie.com/2009/03/01/rumor-control-no-tng-cameos-in-new-star-trek-movie/

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:12:44 PM CST

    not interested

    by robamenta

    if it doesnt have singing hippies of a scene with a midget riding kirks back...count me out

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:51:31 PM CST

    I'm disappopinted that Herc ran this

    by tallboy66

    Biggest letdown ever, totally fake. If Quint or Merrick had run it, I'd just attribute it to them being their usual fuck-up selves, no big deal. Herc has his ear closer to the ground, and shoulda known it was debunked hours later by Trekmovie. All that being said, Star Trek: Countdown is THE MOST IMPORTANT TIE-IN EVER PRODUCED IN TREKDOM! EVER!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 1:58:25 PM CST

    i want tng cameos

    by mr_x

    dammit i shouldn't be reading these spoilers. i want to go into this as a total surprise

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:01:36 PM CST

    Xian042...that's not why it's false

    by dr.dirtyd

    First, no one is saying these characters will appear in the tos time period. If you follow news on this film you'll know, scenes take place less then a decade after the last TNG Movie...which i won't even name.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:09:57 PM CST

    People are not getting something here...

    by dr.dirtyd

    A good thing, film is not bound by conventional time. I'm not sure if any of you "film bros" know this but, you can rearange time any way you want once it's put to film, or ccD or hard drive etc...This film jumps around in time quite a bit.
    We're used to most trek films taking place, at most, over the course of a few days, maybe a week. The writers were quick to note this: There is no Universal law physics that states a Star trek film cannot skip around the time line...without time travel.
    The best time machine is a motion picture camera.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:15:35 PM CST

    robamenta

    by dr.dirtyd

    I bet we'll see "Way to Eden" hippies in the background somewhere.
    Mark my word.

    We will have space Hippie's

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 2:54:15 PM CST

    No Shatner? "I CAN'T GET BEHIND THAT!"

    by pokadoo

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:36:54 PM CST

    SHATNER WILL BE IN IT AND YOU FUCKIN' KNOW IT!!

    by mr sulu

    he'll be seen briefly chowing down on a BLT as pine walks past a 23rd century sandwich shop...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:46:25 PM CST

    So Data ISN'T dead?!

    by xile1c

    In NEMESIS he died, and left behind a doppleganger. I wonder if the movie would address that, or if the comic does for that matter.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:51:25 PM CST

    to the know-it-all debunking the Data rumors

    by arcadian del sol

    If Data couldn't have been around during the time of TOS, then explain how he was able to meet Mark Twain while working as a hotel bellhop?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 3:56:58 PM CST

    Dr.DirtyD

    by onebuckfilms

    It appears from what I can gather that the movie will be completely in the Alternate TOS Timeline.

    It begins before Kirk is born, and cover various points in Kirk's career up to and including assuming command of the Enterprise.

    With a 2 hour running time, and a faster pace than is ususal for a Trek movie, I suspect a lot of story will be covered in the movie.

    I do not believe we will actually see anything in the Post-Nemesis TNG timeline. All of the preamble events from the TNG era are already covered in the Countdown comics that will take us all the way to the opening moments of the movie.

    I suspect the second half of the movie will be close to real-time in storytelling terms, while there will be a number of jumps in the first half (From Baby, to small boy, to events leading to the Academy, to Kobayashi Maru, to first getting on Enterprise).

    It'll likely be linear, but jump ahead a couple of times to cover events.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 5:07:22 PM CST

    The Cloverfield monster will be the cameo!!! I knew it!!!

    by mrmysteryguest

  • Mar 03, 2009 5:29:13 PM CST

    Ol' yellow eyes

    by amy chasing

    Growing up I was a huge fan of TNG, but even I can admit their movies sucked. TNG just didn't get the movie formula right like TOS did. So sticking any TNG stuff into this new movie just reminds me of them sticking Janeway into Nemesis. Bad idea. Keep It Simple (Stupid)!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 5:35:38 PM CST

    I'm counting the days !

    by notveryfunny

    Can't wait to see that movie !

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 5:41:20 PM CST

    SpyGuy

    by joe mannix jr.

    Nice Who reference.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 5:51:35 PM CST

    well that makes me interested. Spoiler I guess..

    by cotton mcknight

    Well the spoiler I'm talking about is that I read earlier here that Data, captain of the Enterprise, rescues somebody or nother, and that leads directly into the movie. If Data is in the movie, then, um, well it kind of contradicts Abram and his boys talking about how bringing back Kirk would violate canon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 6:07:28 PM CST

    robamenta

    by famouseccles

    we'll never see it's like again - how can a film not have midgets

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 6:38:05 PM CST

    Can't agree with you more Mullah Omar

    by agnosticyesno

    Creating an alternate time line which all the subsequent movies will take place in is just lame. Just make a interesting new movie and forgot about trying to use the old actors from the past shows and movies. This comes from a fan of all of those.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 6:38:07 PM CST

    It'd be cool if....

    by excommunicated

    ... an alien crew member in the background looks just like the Cloverfield monster.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 6:41:13 PM CST

    NO SHATNER?...NO MOOLAH!

    by mr sulu

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:06:12 PM CST

    I hope Dr.DirtyD is right

    by famouseccles

    and the story 'jumps' through Kirk's career up to becoming captain. there are a few things in Kirk's past that I hope are not undone [Mitchell, Finnegin, the vampire cloud] and I hope we get a reference to the Kirk family's experience while living on Tarsus IV [or at the very least they leave that period open for sequels]

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:10:10 PM CST

    Kirk doesn't live on Tarsus IV anymore

    by tallboy66

    He lives in Iowa. The timeline changes. He grows up differently. That's the point.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:27:38 PM CST

    CHRISTIAN BALE TO PLAY DATA!!!

    by valentineproductions

    For some reason Bale does remind me of him, especially in American Psycho.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:30:13 PM CST

    AICN: Posting BS rumor from Latino Review and proud of it

    by heckles

    Fan-diddly-damn-tastic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:37:09 PM CST

    Jim Kirk's timeline changes after George

    by famouseccles

    becomes a starship captain. the massacre on Tarsus VI happens before such a promotion [kodos is too cool a villain to "undo"]

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 7:59:22 PM CST

    Simon Pegg's Scotty is an imposter

    by famouseccles

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:01:18 PM CST

    Nero isn't trying to kill Kirk but his actions

    by famouseccles

    keep fucking with Kirk's life

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 8:47:23 PM CST

    Holy Smokes!!!

    by famouseccles

    I just found out why Grace Lee Whitney left Star Trek. I'm shocked. I never knew that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:00:58 PM CST

    Debunked a while ago at TrekMovie.com

    by rsk_taker

    I wish it was true

    But it's not :(

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:04:15 PM CST

    ScriptGirl has big titties???

    by splurch

    LET'S SEE THOSE BABIES!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 9:43:23 PM CST

    Why does George Kirk have to be a starship captain?

    by kabong

    They're always making this stuff too tight.

    The Federation is big, Starfleet is big, the universe is big.

    Stop tying everyone and everything into a concept as small as that coffee shop where Friends used to whine together.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:07:03 PM CST

    let old sulu rape young kirk

    by bacci40

    cuz you know, that has been takei's dream for the past 20 years OH MY!!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:12:41 PM CST

    Arcadian, I'll play along

    by greenstyle92

    Yes yes I know you're full of shit, but maybe I can shoehorn your half assedness into something that almost makes sense as a fan wank.

    In an Enterprise episode, Brent Spiner appeared as an ancestor to Soong, the man who created data. In that episode, this elder soong was interested in eugenics but had to abandon it when his efforts went all KHHHHHAAAAAANNNNNN!!! on him. in that episode, he said that he would be switching his focus to AI, but it may take several generations. This is canon. Okay. Now, lets say, maybe, he did build data in the pre-TOS timeframe, but didn't work out the sentience thing just right. Starfleet did study data for nearly 200 years top secretly in San Fran, but eventually decided the effort was in vein and shut the project down in the pre TNG era. They turned over Data to Soong's descendant, the Soong we know, who took
    Data to a colony, and working independently, solved Data's self awareness problem. He had to flee because of the Krystaline entity, leaving data on the planet. Starfleet picks him up again and fails to inform anyone that this is far from the first time they have encountered data. But, as he seems intelligent now, they sweep it under the rug and encourage him to enroll at the academy.

    There Arcadian, I made your bullshit sort of make fan-wanky sense. Do I get a cookie or a blo job now or something?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 03, 2009 10:14:53 PM CST

    As for someone who mentioned WATCHMEN

    by greenstyle92

    It's weird how the internet works now. All the eruptions of reviews last week sort of capped off my expectations, like that was the big event. Now it feels like Watchmen is old news. yeah, I'll go see it but, jeez, it just feels over. Hopefully we'll have one more official talkback to suss that all out though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 12:11:26 AM CST

    kabong

    by onebuckfilms

    George Kirk is First Officer, and becomes the captain for 12 minutes.

    It serves the dramatic purpose of giving Kirk a very personal reason, beyond Chris Pike, to go into Starfleet rather than remain a bum.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 12:39:34 AM CST

    Let me explain Star Trek AKA Gayness to you geeks

    by boogy110

    This is a reboot of the original Gayness, there may be appearances of the TNG Gayness in order to tell the story of the reboot of he gayness via the eyes of Cock, a main character of the original non rebooted gayness.
    In the sequal to J.J Abrahms reboot of Gayness, the crew of the U.S.S F.A.G 6969 are sent back in time to save a giant Cock, which differs significantly because in the original non reboot gayness, they save a whale.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 2:28:17 AM CST

    Q

    by dingbatty

  • Mar 04, 2009 2:30:43 AM CST

    George Kirk isn't a Captain

    by lockesbrokenleg

    He's just on the Kelvin at the start of the movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 2:43:06 AM CST

    Next Gen. love.....

    by the true priapic

    It's fairly obvious from this talkback that there's still plenty of love for the Next Gen crew.This new film simply hasn't interested me in the slightest.It was only when the prequel comic hinted at Data and Picard cameos that I got even slightly interested.Next Gen really didn't get a good enough send off in the cinema.I hated Generations with a passion(the only film in my history of going to the cinema taht I went for a piss in the middle of),First Cointact was good but suffered from falling back on time travel shenanigans(hell,the cast were giving it their all- although Troi's drunk scene is still terrible),the next film(can never remember it's daman name)should never have been green-lit as a story.It wasa tv episode and a boring one.Rewatching it recently I was shocked to discover it was fairly watchable but...a MOVIE??!By the end of it the characters have progressed in no way.Data is confusingly more-childlike and naive.Strange film altogether.Nemesis..hmm.I didn't like the designs of the romulan ships,the Scimitar looked like Babylon 5.....where to begin.The Next Gen only ever used the Romulans well twice,in the 3rd season eps. The Enemy and the terrific The Defector.I think both Ron Moore eps too.Sadly it was an opportunity that was well and truly missed.Stewart et al are still fun together but the film simply made me angry at the flicks.I remember groaning loudly at Picards strange request of Troi that she try to put up with the psychic rapes????!!Losing his phaser at the end,breaking the Reman gun over the head of said Reman....literally laughable scenes.Such a shame.I adored The Next Gen. and really hoped we might get someone in to write and direct a film in such a fresh way as Meyer did with Khan.I'm afraid a cameo by Picard of Data in this new movie(I know,the rumour is bullshit)would not be a good idea as it would simply serve to confuse less-Trek interested fans.I don't like the whole premise of this new movie,it stinks of the same imagination-cancer that has Hollywood churning out reboots and remakes.Fuck it,I can still go back and rewatch old eps but new films genuinely don't get me excited much any more.Thank God there are still small gems to be found like Let the Right One In.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 3:06:10 AM CST

    What to do with this mess...

    by sithtastic

    There's been a big brouhaha on this and other boards on the coming defenestration of this series with J.J. Abrams essentially taking character archetypes he likes and casting it into a Star Trek movies. The words "rape" and "bastardization" have been tossed about b/c from what I've read, that's not far off. That said, ANY of the slightest nods to the past series along with the far superior actors (Yes, even Shatner.) in this thing cannot hurt it in the least...or rather hurt it more.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 5:02:30 AM CST

    rats - what happens to kirk on tarsus 4

    by famouseccles

    should be kept - but whatever happens - no next gen at least [gay tv of the lowest kind]

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 7:23:46 AM CST

    How it *could* happen, and still be secret

    by v'shael

    If there's a final post-credits scene, where old Spock (played by Nimoy) returns to the 24th century. And while he's coming out of the time-machine or whatever, they use a voice clip of Shatner saying "Spock?" (some other appropriate sound clip) and the camera stays focused on Nimoy's face as he displays real emotion.

    That way, they can undo Kirk's death, have no shatner in the movie, and STILL manage to keep it a secret from the net/fans/spies etc...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 7:24:29 AM CST

    Arcadian

    by v'shael

    "If Data couldn't have been around during the time of TOS, then explain how he was able to meet Mark Twain while working as a hotel bellhop?"

    Time Travel. The episode was Times Arrow.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 7:26:17 AM CST

    TheMark : Watchmen

    by v'shael

    "Oh and guys--saw Watchmen last night. This movie is NOT for fans of the book. Seriously. Having read Watchmen is going to diminish your enjoyment--you'll more than likely leave feeling kinda meh, just as I did."

    Dude. You are so right. So many reviewers gave this such glowing praise. And truthfully, honestly, not hating or any bullshit, I saw it last night, and I would not pay money to see it a second time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 7:34:47 AM CST

    Give it a rest with the 'gayness'

    by geordiematt

    The homophobia in this talkback is a fucking disgrace. 'Gayness', 'gay tv', 'Sulu raping Kirk'? Not funny or clever dudes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 8:50:33 AM CST

    Tribbles are icons. No Tribbles?

    by chrismata

    What about the green lady Kirk slept with? Or that monster he ran away from in the desert? Both icons I want to see.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 9:03:16 AM CST

    cliffhangers yeah

    by drlektor

    Star Trek has always had a very clear method for time travel, being that there is only ONE timeline that we see and travel back to the past does not create an offshoot reality. Check out a time travel episode for any number of examples. The prequel comic will end with the TNG crew failing to stop Nero from travelling back in time. In theory the moment Nero leaves, the entire TNG era will change and we'll see either the brand spanking "it's like the old TNG but better" or a rag-tag Battlestar Galactica type deal with the survivors of two dozen wars disasterous drifting aimlessly.
    There's supposed to be a shock in the movie, something big that shouldn't have happened. We already have Kirk delaying his joining of starfleet by several years thanks to his dad's death. My guess is a major character is going to die or yeah, maybe Vulcan will blow up, that'd fuck humanity good and proper.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 9:20:28 AM CST

    I'm pleased to see the love for TNG

    by rbatty024

    Sure, at times it was stuck in the eighties or early nineties, but sometimes it is difficult to get over the crappy sets of the original. The crew had a good rapport and I enjoyed watching the show from week to week. That's about all you can ask from a Trek series.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 11:24:42 AM CST

    JarJar works in a saloon scene instead of his party scene.

    by kabong

    # We first meet Uhura when Kirk is drunk at a Starfleet hangout in Iowa and he boorishly hits on her.

    # JJ Abrams slips in a reference to his own mythology during the aforementioned bar scene when a patron asks for a Slusho. Also, product placement makes its first entry into the Trek Universe when Uhura orders a Budweiser Classic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 11:30:57 AM CST

    OK I officially don't want to know anything else about this movi

    by quadrupletree

    it sounds like there are some nice surprises in store for us, so I'm officially excited to see this now. So far, everything I've seen looks like JJ pulled his pants down and took a steaming dump on Star Trek IMO. But I hope to God I'm wrong!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 2:15:14 PM CST

    DrLektor: Trek ideed does have alternate timelines.

    by royston lodge

    1) There's the Mirror Universe. 2) There's the TNG episode where hundreds/thousands of alternate Enterprises are temporarily pulled into the "main" Trek continuity. Granted, these are examples of parallel universes, and not necessarily timelines that are offshoots of the main Trek continuity. HOWEVER . . . 3) There's the alternate timeline that Q facilitated in the TNG finale. Again, this is an offshoot of the main timeline. True, it's unclear if this was real or merely one of Q's tricks. HOWEVER . . . 4) There's the alternate timeline involving the Enterprise-C which resulted in Tasha Yar giving birth to her half-Romulan daughter, presumedly before Tasha Yar was even born. This is indeed, definitely, an offshoot of the main Trek continuity timeline.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 5:49:26 PM CST

    true in a way royston

    by drlektor

    but not totally. What I said was time travel to the past doesn't create alternate realities, what I meant was, if there ARE changes, then we only see the direct effect on the MAIN Trek timeline. The Tasha Yar saga is a perfect example. At the start Tasha dies. They encounter the Enterprise C and what happens? The main Trek timeline is distorted. When the Enterprise C goes back to the past with Tasha, the timeline reverts but with NEW features. ie Sela is born. There very well might be a reality where this never happened, where they never encountered the Enterprise C at all but Trek never acknowleges this. The same is going to be true for the upcoming movie, the premise is very similar. The Trek timeline is very linear, yes, okay offshoot realities are created wily nily and we get a glimpse every now and again, like the thousands of Enterprises episode where Worf hops dimensions but they're very clear that he returns to the prime universe aren't they?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 04, 2009 9:35:44 PM CST

    Please FOR THE LOVE OF GOD keep Shatner OUT of this film

    by j2talk

  • Mar 05, 2009 1:33:25 AM CST

    geordiematt On Gayness

    by boogy110

    When we use the term Gayness, I'm not talking about sucking cock gay. That would less humiliating than posting talk backs on how time travel is possible in Gay Trek.
    Gay Trek is gay, like a man wearing a fanny pack. It's fucking super gay. George Tekai is no were near as gay as talking about how time travel is possible in the Gay Trey world and then trying to explain how it's done.
    As for homophonia, no, I am not afraid to fight a gay guy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 05, 2009 7:57:09 AM CST

    Boogy110 on spelling errors

    by geordiematt

    You'd like that, wouldn't you boogy110 - a bit of a wrestle with a gay guy? But seriously, people need to stop using 'gay' as a derogatory term. It's insulting and ignorant. By the way, I'm loving the new phrase you've disco ered... 'homophonia'. Maybe you're a genius after all! Also... bring on Star Trek.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 05, 2009 4:37:08 PM CST

    HOMOPHONIA

    by boogy110

    Fear of gay phone calls.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback