Logo

Cool News

The Director Of AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH Brings Us...MELROSE PLACE!?

Published at:  Feb 24, 2009 12:06:00 PM CST


Merrick here...


With 90210 now resurrected, The Powers That Be are now turning their attention to revamping MELROSE PLACE.
Seems Davis Guggenheim will be directing the recently greenlit pilot for the proposed/probable series.

Guggenheim, who is under a deal at CBS Par, is known for directing edgier dramas such as "Deadwood," "24" and the pilot for "The Unit," but early in his career, he helmed lighter fare including Fox's "Party of Five."


...says THIS ARTICLE in Hollywood Reporter.

Guggenheim also directed Al Gore's AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH back in 2006.

Here's a mashup of the original 1992-1999 series' title sequences, lest we forget....









    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 12:08:53 PM CST

    This talkback's getting warmer!

    by themarinebiologist

    Although the rest of AICN is getting relatively cooler. Global Warming?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 12:17:41 PM CST

    Christian Bale does not approve

    by arcadian del sol

    This talkback is not approved. Do not use.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 1:05:03 PM CST

    EVERYTHING HAS HAPPENED BEFORE AND WILL AGAIN

    by turketron

    Bring on the Party of 5 remake but make them cylons.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 1:24:29 PM CST

    Yep, it's all happening again :(

    by losteroo

    Some idiot turned the frozen donkey wheel and now we're all paying the price!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 1:27:11 PM CST

    can't wait until next year...

    by ravex

    when we get the remakes of desperate housewives and one tree hill.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 1:28:49 PM CST

    Want some Six Degrees of Melrose info?

    by dragon man

    Davis Guggenheim is married to Elisabeth Shue, who is the brother of Andrew Shue, who was one of the cast on the original. May or may not have something to do with why this guy is involved but it's good trivia.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 1:30:07 PM CST

    dawsons creek: the next generation

    by mrgreentheplant

    just update some of the haircuts and make joey lose 20 pounds- i want to see those arm bones people! and hurry up because frankly, i don't want to wait

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 1:47:12 PM CST

    lighter fare including Fox's "Party of Five."

    by slder78

    uhh.. Party of Five was one of the best dramas ever produced for TV. It's the best in my book. I don't know where they could say it "lighter fare" There were some episode that made you want to kill yourself afterward i.e. "intervention".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 1:53:39 PM CST

    best headline ever

    by juror number 8

    downtown los angeles is enveloped by a man eating iceberg, causing privileged children to snort coke and fuck.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 2:22:42 PM CST

    Melrose Place, now with more bullshit global warming mongering

    by somashine

  • Feb 24, 2009 2:50:03 PM CST

    Laguna Beach reimagining...

    by turketron

    Is what we need next.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 3:01:16 PM CST

    What was light about Party of Five

    by stuntcock mike

    That show was non-stop misery.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 3:13:21 PM CST

    He's Mr. Elizabeth Shue!

    by fuckmichaelbay

    But his eps of DEADWOOD are fucking masterpieces!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 3:49:20 PM CST

    Here's an inconvenient truth

    by jodet

    Carbon dioxide does not cause global warming. Global warming causes carbon dioxide. We are currently in the end of a ten thousand year cycle of warmer weather. In 100 years St.Paul Minnesota may well be under 100 feet of ice.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 3:50:50 PM CST

    Both were works of Fiction anyway

    by georgieboy

    So I don't see any problem with it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 4:47:49 PM CST

    Party of five "lighter fare"?

    by punto

    heh. if they keep that mentality, they might just re-make Party of five into an as a spring-break show. You know, until episode 8 when one of the guy gets some horrible STD and becomes retarded, and the chick dies while trying to perform an abortion with a hanger wire (it was the guy's baby, she raped him while she was changing his diaper).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 4:54:07 PM CST

    He's not Mr. Elizabeth Shue

    by fooku

    He's her brother. You sicko.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 5:24:10 PM CST

    He bangs Elisabeth Shue, so it's all good!

    by yackbacker

    Davis, come back to "24" homey!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 6:11:30 PM CST

    Grant Show is a very underrated actor

    by slimballs

    Guy almost made Point Pleasant watchable.
    I hope he doesn't appear on this show, he deserves so much more.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 6:50:10 PM CST

    He sounds perfect

    by jdb1972

    After all, he's apparently used to bad, hysterical, overdramatic fiction.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 8:08:04 PM CST

    I tells ya whut

    by spaz_monkey

    Remake or not, they'd best hire Thomas Calabro as Michael Mancini. He was the single greatest sleazy smarmy bastard in TV history. Melrose will not be watchable without him.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 24, 2009 9:27:06 PM CST

    An Inconvenient Place! (like the back of a Volkswagon)

    by flim springfield

  • Feb 24, 2009 10:14:21 PM CST

    Loved it

    by tocksick

    This show was such a guilty pleasure back in the day. Until Kimberly blew up the apartment and Darren Star left - then the show turned into chaotic, recycled bullshit. I probably won't watch it unless I heard amazing things which is highly unlikely.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 25, 2009 12:02:05 AM CST

    If you've seen Guggenheim's Gossip (shudder) then this isn't a s

    by paul t. ryan

    Terrible, terrible film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 25, 2009 12:55:01 AM CST

    where are the Models Inc. & Central Park West remakes!?!?!

    by boomers_lips

    Models Inc. was the Melrose Place spinoff starring Carrie-Anne Moss and the 'Lilah' lawyer chick from ANGEL as fashion models. Central Park West starred Mariel Hemingway & Raquel Welch! that's all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 25, 2009 3:36:40 AM CST

    I released some pretty potent gases earlier

    by prossor

    and it was at a greater frequency and HEFT than normal, AM I CONTRIBUTING TO GLOBAL WARMING?!!?!??!!??!?!?!!??!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 25, 2009 8:52:34 AM CST

    Can see it now..

    by portnoysrevenge

    a bunch of pretty people running around buying useless carbon credits because they feel guilty about their expensive cars, oversized condos and their trips to Europe.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 25, 2009 9:55:00 AM CST

    Melrose Place Was More True To Life...

    by ericinwisconsin

    ...than "An Inconvenient Truth". He may struggle because of that. As long as the icebergs in L.A. don't hold up filming.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 25, 2009 1:19:14 PM CST

    The set of Chuck

    by randallrst

    Is the set of Melrose Place. Are they going to steal it back?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 26, 2009 10:37:06 AM CST

    Rob Estes was on Melrose Place, now on The New 90210

    by big jim

    So why not use old 90210 actors for the new Melrose Place? Ian Zeiring can be the new Michael. Brian Austin Green can be the new Jake. Jason Priestly and Luke Perry can play a gay couple. Hilary Swank can take on the Amy Locane role and get canned after a handful of episodes (just like when she was on 90210). Tiffany Amber Thiessen, Kathleen Robertson, Lindsay Price, & Vanessa Marcil can spend every episode sitting around the pool in bikinis.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 26, 2009 10:56:00 AM CST

    and after the first 6 months introduce

    by big jim

    James Eckhouse and list him as a "Special Guest Star" even though he appears prominently in every single episode for the series' remaining 200 episodes.I had to look that up - seems Melrose Place ran from 1992 - 1999. In that time they did 227 episodes. That averages out to 32 per season. Or, another way to look at it: Over the course of an entire year 61.5% of the time there was a new episode that week. If you break it down to just the TV season, August through May, that means that in those 10 months, there was a new episode 80% of the time. Or, out of 40 weeks of a very liberal "Fall/Winter Schedule", there were only 8 weeks when a new episode did not air.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 26, 2009 11:04:36 AM CST

    Yes, I know 10 months wouldn't be exactly 40 weeks

    by big jim

    It would be closer to 42 or 43 weeks. So it would be more like 75% of the time during the Fall/Winter Season there would be a new episode and more like only 10 or 11 weeks during that time there wouldn't be a new episode. Still, those numbers are like nothing we see these days.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback