Ain't It Cool News (
Movie News

Toys & Packaging From J.J.'s TREK Hint At What We'll Be Seeing In Stores (And On Screen) Soon...

Merrick here...
Images of toys from Abrams' STAR TREK movie are making their way across the Internet, providing our first look at packaging & better looks at several figures & designs from the film.
You can find many more toy images (figures and gadgets both in and out of packages) via THIS flickr photostream. Many (if not all) of the pics seem to originate from THIS Japanese website, which appears to be taking pre-orders. Most/all of these should be hitting stores in late April. "Original Spock"? Sounds like a soft drink...

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:37 a.m. CST


    by jarjarmessiah

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:38 a.m. CST

    I can die now!

    by jarjarmessiah

    I have become an AICN cliche.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:39 a.m. CST

    O.S. :Original Spock!

    by jarjarmessiah

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:40 a.m. CST


    by whofan71

    Looking forward to the movie, but this does nothing for me. Doesn't really seem like anything we havent already seen or heard.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:43 a.m. CST

    I prefer New Spock Baja Blast Xtreme,

    by The Reluctant Austinite

    but I'm a Pepper.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:43 a.m. CST

    Meh also

    by Geekgasm

    J.J. better make his money fast before Wolverine and John Connor gobble up his market share.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:45 a.m. CST

    Fuck me no Kirk dildo!

    by EvilWizardGlick

    Goddammit no Spock one either.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:46 a.m. CST

    Fuck it allno Krik mask for Halloween 2!

    by EvilWizardGlick

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:54 a.m. CST

    This year's Superman Returns

    by Muki

    Star Trek will be this year's Superman Returns. Young models playing classic characters, check. A over-rated director with geek cred, check. A massive budget spent almost exclusively on CGI, check. Fuck all story, check.

  • seriously. why is this news?

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:05 a.m. CST


    by ArcadianDS

    Seriously, this is the 5th update about toys in the past month?

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:09 a.m. CST

    Who the fuck cares when AVATAR is fucking our eyeballs in 2009?

    by Motoko Kusanagi


  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:13 a.m. CST

    is AVATAR still going 3-D?

    by rben

    reason i ask is i may not be able to watch it. I had lasix done years ago and a while back i tried to watch Meet the Robinsons in 3-D and literally couldn't see the images. Which makes me wonder if the same thing would happen to me if i tried to watch Coraline. Or has the 3-D been refined better since then. Any lasic peoples out there having the same problem i am?

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:25 a.m. CST

    I don't want one of those communicators

    by kabong

    unless it actually works. <P> Stupid phaser I bought at a convention won't even stun a person--forget about disintegration. <P> My red shirt is fading, but it still fits me, although it is a little tight.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:25 a.m. CST

    Here's a question...

    by Hairy Nutsack

    **SPOILER**<p> Okay, so we know the new look and alterations are a result of an alternate timeline thingy because the Romulan goes back and changes something, but had this not happened then everything would have looked O.S. right?<p> This movie is a likely hit, but can anyone see them devolving the sets etc. into the O.S. look in the sequel after they've resolved the crisis in this movie? Of course they won't, so this is a reboot whether they admit it or not. Bye-bye continuity.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:45 a.m. CST

    Holy crap! The new Trek film will have the Enterprise in it?

    by TheContinentalOp

    Man, I didn't see that coming!

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:47 a.m. CST


    by ricarleite


  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:51 a.m. CST


    by ricarleite

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:54 a.m. CST


    by Bishop6


  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:54 a.m. CST


    by Bishop6

    I bought all that shit expecting it to be an awesome movie, then after I saw it I wanted to throw them all in the trash can...

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 12:25 p.m. CST

    I will buy the ship toy.

    by Smashing

    It will look cool on top of my TV.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 12:40 p.m. CST

    Crap Fu grip

    by SomaShine

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 12:47 p.m. CST

    And then there are the toys Sulu will bring to the table

    by EriamJH

    "Official Star Trek BenWah Balls TM®©" from Ronco!

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 12:49 p.m. CST

    Look at the packaging for "stackability" on the shelves

    by EriamJH

    Spock's packaging on its side looks like a roman numeral 5 -- great for those marketeers who want to relate him with "Star Trek V - The Final Frontier"

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 12:54 p.m. CST

    Gay Kirk doll with tiny KY Jelly tube and Kneepads.

    by Smerdyakov

    Don't miss out.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 1:10 p.m. CST

    Ol' Dirty Spock!

    by YackBacker

    Original Spockster! What the FUCK has happened to STAR TREK????

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 1:25 p.m. CST

    Gay as Christmas Sulu

    by Barmat

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 1:45 p.m. CST

    by mr blandings

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 1:52 p.m. CST

    Van De Kamp's fishticks ad is more exciting than JJ-Prise.

    by YackBacker

    Ooooo TARTAR sauce! I did enjoy how poorly the Japanese website misspelled all of the crew's names.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 2:55 p.m. CST

    We're about due

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    another shatner rant about not being given a part in this

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 3:34 p.m. CST

    Where is Spock's lightsaber?

    by dihay

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 3:36 p.m. CST

    New, Improved Spock with furry Tribbles...

    by dihay

    under the cloak...ewwwwwwww

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 3:53 p.m. CST

    No MEGO?

    by Wyatt Wingfoot

    Me. No. Go...

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 4:09 p.m. CST

    Orci...your a nice guy..but Fuuuuuck!

    by conspiracy

    Do we come over there and trash your fucking Lost scripts? Then why in the FUCK are you fucking up my Trek?! Fucking Amateur..

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 4:34 p.m. CST

    Enterprise looks like $#|+

    by GeorgieBoy

    No matter how you slice it, the original TV show Enterprise looks 100x better.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 5:39 p.m. CST


    by kwisatzhaderach

    Avatar will be screene in 2D as well. Cameron is framing all his shots as 2D, if they work as 3D it's an added bonus.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 5:40 p.m. CST

    That new Enterprise is shit

    by kwisatzhaderach

    Why did they put the engines so close to each other? I mean, this is basic, common sense stuff. Morons.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 5:41 p.m. CST

    The original 60s TV show Enterprise...

    by ccchhhrrriiisssm

    ...was a tiny, hippie-inspired model that looked like it was made out of wood. At least this thing looks plausible. <p>I do, however, hope that this ship somehow evolves into the movie Enterprise. That ship...was cool.</p> I am looking forward to this film.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 5:45 p.m. CST

    Will there be an obese 70 yr old Kirk doll?

    by ccchhhrrriiisssm

    It would make all of those friendless Trekkie fanatics happy. <p>This film looks great! My only concern: The ship's fuselage is too short...and the engine constructs are too far back. Other than that...I love it! </p> The Enterprise in this film is sooooooo much better than that fugly ship from that old 1960s TV show.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 5:53 p.m. CST

    The old Enterprise is shit...

    by ccchhhrrriiisssm

    What was it? PVC pipe or a block of wood held up by string? Even the interior looked like shit. It looked like plywood with LiteBrites for computers. <p>Can't wait to see someone who actually spent money on the Star Trek concept!!! </p>

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 6:10 p.m. CST

    Orci never wrote for Lost

    by BrightEyes

    he did alias

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 6:24 p.m. CST

    This Looks Like Everything Else Star Trek????

    by Media Messiah

    Give us something new to swoon over. It is time for a new Star Trek, one happening 100 years post Star Trek: The Next Generation, Deep Space 9, and Voyager. I want new look, and new style for future Star Trek adventures. Why they are doing prequels, I'll never know???

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 6:26 p.m. CST


    by alice 13


  • Feb. 10, 2009, 6:49 p.m. CST

    Maker: The Others

    by SifoDyasJr.

    So it's a crossover

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 7:10 p.m. CST

    people who bash the design of old strek

    by BendersShinyAss

    watch star trek 2 again and you'll note it's just as cheesy plywood and cardboard.... they just spent some time making it look cooler

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 7:17 p.m. CST

    Is this finally the film...


    in which Patrick Stewart will make all the womens' clothes fall off, and they'll immediately try to cover up despite the fact that he already saw everything?

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 7:28 p.m. CST

    I'm excited

    by Davidia

    I was never a fan of Trek, except for dabbling into some TNG. But Star Trek isn't relevant anymore to this fast-changing world, this looks like just the update the series needs to stay fresh. Oh, and tell me MI:3 wasn't awesome, go ahead, I dare you.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 8:45 p.m. CST

    Davidia = Plant

    by Geekgasm

    More plant than a Led Zep reunion. Straight from Paramount Pictures to you!

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 8:50 p.m. CST

    Yes, I am a plant

    by Davidia

    I hear Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is a tour de force from ACCLAIMED director Michael Bay. I can't wait for robot fighting action coming our way this summer of '09!

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 9:49 p.m. CST

    New TREK trailer will be attached to WATCHMEN

    by YackBacker

    So says

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 10:25 p.m. CST

    Davidia -

    by Sgt.Steiner

    What's not relevant is your completely fucking useless opinion.

  • Feb. 10, 2009, 11:24 p.m. CST

    Touche! My brain hurts now!

    by Davidia

    Quite the quip. You must be one of those tough guys that scare me in real life?

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 1:52 a.m. CST

    Go visit the sciffy museum in Seattle.

    by Dingbatty

    It has props from nearly every major sci fi film and show. Most of it looks like cardboard up close, except for stuff from the original BSG, Winston's Terminator, and the costume for the Rocketeer.

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 4:02 a.m. CST

    wait- they're selling PLANTS now?

    by Maniaq

    there aint no "i" in pimp- no, wait...

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 4:21 a.m. CST


    by jackalcack

    Unless you're a marijuana plant and I can smoke you, go away

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 5:58 a.m. CST

    Has life...

    by Davidia your moms basement really made you all so cynical that any expression of enthusiasm must be met with upfront douchebaggery and accusations? Oh wait...this is AICN, carry on misanthropes!

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 6:20 a.m. CST

    Mom's basement

    by jackalcack

    Jesus, that's such a fucking cliche. Yawn.

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 6:41 a.m. CST

    So is...

    by Davidia

    A lame-ass juvenile pot reference out of the blue, so I'm sure where you can see where I came up with the association.

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 7:25 a.m. CST least he's an *educated* plant...

    by Damned if I can login

    Proper English rules.<p>Carry on with the erudite obloquy, m'man...good stuff.

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 7:28 a.m. CST


    by Damned if I can login

    perfect. I love it...

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 11:57 a.m. CST

    by Muki

    Seriously though, this film looks like utter shit.

  • Feb. 11, 2009, 12:13 p.m. CST

    re: Hairy Nutsack

    by EverythingEverywhereStinks

    Hey Hairy Nutsack, you're not seriously still operating under the belief that this film was ever anything other than a start-from-square-one reimagining of the Star Trek concept, are you? The only people who still think this is a continuation of the original Star Trek are the sad people who want to believe it because they read a mediocre comic book that was promoted as a tie-in. Lame.