Logo

Cool News

TAKEN Charged Capone's Batteries and Makes Him Excited to See the Unrated Cut!!!

Published at:  Jan 30, 2009 5:20:05 PM CST


Hey everyone. Capone in Chicago here.

For the better part of the last 365 days, the Luc Besson-written and -produced TAKEN has been opening country by country across the world until it finally hits screens in America this weekend. I'm guessing this film has been out on DVD already in some lands for quite some time, so those of you desperate enough to see this probably already have. But for the rest of us, the long wait it over--I've been seeing trailers for this film on and off for about six months now. And I'm happy to report the wait is mostly worth it. This is a quick-fix, shot of adrenaline in the brain work that doesn't offer much in the way of character development or plot, but has just enough of both to make this an above-average thriller and one of the better offerings I've seen from the Besson camp in recent years.

Perhaps an unlikely--although certainly not unwelcome--choice for our hero is Liam Neeson playing Bryan Mills, a seemingly mild-mannered father who has recently quit his government job and relocated to be closer to his 17-year-old daughter, Kim (Maggie Grace, once of "Lost"), who has lived with her mother (Famke Janssen) and exceedingly wealthy stepfather. Kim seems open to allowing her long-absent father back into her life, but a lot of time has passed when he hasn't been there for her because of his mysterious job, and Bryan is impatient to reconnect.

On the eve of a lunch Bryan and Kim area supposed to have together, Bryan is pulled by some old work buddies into a one-night, well-paid security job that involves playing babysitter to a young pop star, whose life Bryan saves from a stalker's knife. This is the first chance we get to see just how well trained this man is, and the veil is slowly lifted from his past.

At lunch, Kim proposes a long trip to Europe with her best friend that her father must sign off on in order for it to happen. At first, he's against the idea, but then he relents with certain conditions, all pertaining to her safety. If you can get past the fact that this daughter character is a shallow, selfish, world-class manipulator (not unlike her mother), you might actually care what happens to her as much as her father does. It's not an easy task.

Sure enough, the two girls have barely landed in Paris when they are both snatched from the house where they are staying. Kim has just enough time to call her father before she is taken, and in the brief conversation, she conveys enough information to set him down the path to finding her, while maiming or killing everyone involved in the abduction with an efficiency that is quite wonderful to behold.

Through the course of the film, we find out that Bryan was a "preventer" for the government--a preventer of bad things, according to him. And he possesses some very special skills that make him uniquely qualified to deal with just these circumstances (and many others, I'm guessing). Part Jack Bauer, part Jason Bourne, with a little bit of Daniel Craig's James Bond thrown in, Neeson actually does a particularly stellar job pulling this role off and making us sense this man's desperation not to lose his daughter that he's foolishly waited this long to get to know.

His search puts him into contact with some fairly seedy characters and situations (although TAKEN manages to barely maintain a PG-13 rating--I imagine there's an R-rated version just dying to get out). The guy has no qualms about torturing the guilty--or the innocent if he must. There's one sequence in particular that may not sit well with people, when he shoots the innocent wife of a former ally who is holding back vital information Bryan needs. It's a totally unexpected moment that will make some people scream and others smile. Bryan routinely promises a stay of execution in exchange for information, then doesn't live up to his side of the bargain. It's a great thing.

Director and Besson protégé Pierre Morel (DISTRICT 13, and whose next film with Besson, FROM PARIS WITH LOVE, already has a pretty great trailer) has a real gift for staging fight sequences in tight quarters and choreographing exciting foot chases. I realize this is fairly familiar territory in today's action landscape, but there's something extra brutal and painful in the way Morel handles it. The final act when we find out exactly why Kim has been kidnapped (not there's any big surprise) might be a bit of a letdown for some--it was for me--if only because it was a bit obvious, rushed, and doesn't play out in an inventive way.

For all of you proud Americans, beware of the not-so-subtle subtext here about American behavior. Kim and her friend are loud, annoying American teens who just want to come to Europe to party and hook up with French guys. Bryan represents the administration under which he served. Torture and cold-blooding killing come as naturally to him as brushing his teeth. It seems like a fairly clear-cut undercurrent throughout the film that's easy to push to the side, but impossible to ignore. Still, Neeson adds enough substance to his character that you can literally see him lift the material upon his shoulders and carry it to the finish line. TAKEN is far from a great film, but looking at the landscape of new releases right now, it's one of the better ones that isn't up for an award in a couple of weeks.

-- Capone
capone@aintitcoolmail.com







    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:21:22 PM CST

    Taken?

    by skidmarkedundies

    Any pics?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:21:57 PM CST

    FIRST!!!

    by skidmarkedundies

    After the fact!!! NICE!!! Seriously, though I need some caps from the film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:24:30 PM CST

    Luc Besson kicks me in the pants!

    by chrismata

    I can't wait to see this movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:28:11 PM CST

    Yeah, it just come out on DVD in Australia.

    by maxthesilent

    Haven't picked it up yet, but the trailer looked pretty sweet. As long as it doesn't suddenly go all TRANSPORTER on us at the end and go all ridiculous.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:29:10 PM CST

    More than just a little Jack Bauer

    by skimn

    "he shoots the innocent wife of a former ally who is holding back vital information" Much like Jack Bauer shooting the wife of the Peter Weller character (JoBeth Williams) a season or two ago.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:30:37 PM CST

    sound good enough

    by jamestewart007

    I'll catch this one on cheap night.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:33:00 PM CST

    i dont think he LITERALLY lifts the material

    by hella

    onto his shoulders.... i think it would look pretty retarded for liam to be running arond with his script attached to his shoulder

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:35:07 PM CST

    annnnnd...

    by hella

    id let maggie grace pee on my face

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:49:51 PM CST

    "for all of you proud americans"

    by frankenfickle

    you're an offensive dude.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 5:52:50 PM CST

    This movie is BRILLIANT!

    by napolean solo

    It isn't meant to be The Godfather Part II, but it gives you exactly what the trailer says it will.

    AND IT GETS IT RIGHT. Liam carries this fil from start to finish, and that's the main thing that makes 'Taken' Great!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 6:13:21 PM CST

    "It's a totally unexpected moment"...

    by cornholio1980

    Not anymore. Thanks, pal!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 6:20:40 PM CST

    may see it

    by whatcokes982

    Sounds a lot like 24's first season. Gawd, that was great. I still remember Jack ruthlessly hunting down the Drazens after he thought Kim was dead.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 6:25:27 PM CST

    How about a fuckin SPOILER box??

    by steele8280

    I know many people around the world (including myself) have already seen the film, but give the Americans a chance to experience the "unexpected" moments the same way you got to, eh? Without knowing what the fuck happens if they don't want to. Hence, a spoiler box - is that so hard? On another note, nice review - for those who have seen it/don't mind spoilers (and no, i'm not talking plot points).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 6:39:36 PM CST

    Seen it..

    by daveyf

    It's an above average movie.. it's nothing to get your panties all up in a bunch.

    The people on this site.. they see a classic every week. Let The Right One In is vastly over-rated here as well. The only thing I've agreed with this site's reviewers all year is about The Dark Knight. It's been a really shitty couple of last months..

    If you speak a little french and love a good mindfuck, see 99 F with Jean Dujardin.. now that's a good movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 6:42:16 PM CST

    Yep

    by melvin_pelvis

    I bet Segal is pissed he didn't do this story. just. one. more. time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 6:45:46 PM CST

    I second the "How about a fuckin SPOILER box?"

    by fooku

    Pull your head outta your ass and tag this thing because you've now ruined half of the fucking movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 7:18:28 PM CST

    Great action movie, better than Bourne or Bond

    by antonphd

    And far from a let down... you kept expecting some retarded contrived connection... like it was the step dad or the spy friends who were somehow behind this... nope... this was... say it with me... totally realistic... this is what the REAL bad people in the world are. And what she is taken for is the MOST horrible evil in this world. This was an action movie for adults. I'll be buying the Blue Ray on release day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 7:23:36 PM CST

    release the "unrated" fucking version in theaters

    by geek molester

    who the fuck are you kidding, all the kids can see whatever they fuckin want to when it hits DVD anyways. Why the fuck do Europeans get to see the less anal retentive versions of their films?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 7:25:25 PM CST

    agree with daveyf

    by geek molester

    the last few months + have been absolutely shitacular. Guess we were spoiled by 2007.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 7:34:35 PM CST

    Take the fucking elephant!

    by bioforge

    Been a long way for the return of Darkman , but he is back. I do think Liam Neeson could be the meanest motherfucker if he ever decided to take that career path.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 7:56:46 PM CST

    Yeah, Jack Bauer...but without all his shouting and ham-fisted..

    by bob cryptonight

    ...sloppiness. Neeson is much smoother than Keifer could ever be. But man, this film has some awesome violence!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 8:01:35 PM CST

    Ya..

    by shogunmaster

    I wouldn't mind 'snatching' Maggie Grace either..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 8:33:48 PM CST

    Very intense film...

    by cenobite

    [SPOILERS!!!]............ Watching Liam go around killing half of Paris was quite an intense rush. However the only part that was weird was how everyone just understood his English... especially when he was pretending to be French. I want to believe that they just decided to do "The Hunt for Red October" instead of going through the need for Liam speaking French?? well... just without doing the language 'switch'. The ending was also a bit 'reality-free' as to how Liam could get away without legal action by the French after destroying half of Paris is beyond me. Maybe they just didn't need to show that?.............. [/end SPOILERS] That was my only nerdy critique. The rest was pretty brilliant.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 8:36:28 PM CST

    this movie is soooooooo overrated

    by thedark0knight

    Its such a mediocre action flick, but for some reason everyone loves it. I watched it a few months ago online after hearing how great it was and was incredibly disappointed...how come every Besson project now days has to be so damn cheesy? All my friends that have seen this love it as well, maybe im being to critical of it but I just thought it was lame as hell.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 8:38:28 PM CST

    cross Jason Bourne with John McClain

    by funnyhat

    That's what I felt like I was watching for the last 15 minutes. And there isnt a person in all of london who can stand up to Neeson's character. He tears through swaths of nameless badguys all the way through.
    Anyway, spot-on review.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 8:59:19 PM CST

    I agree with the need for a spoiler warning.

    by beowulf316

    this should probably have one

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 9:15:43 PM CST

    not a bad way to spend an hr and a half

    by j2talk

    the wife enjoyed it....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 9:32:30 PM CST

    old guys that dont go gray

    by jimmyjoe redsky

    i want to see this too - but i wish neeson looked more the part - from the neck up - an older dad retired from dirty govt work - that hipster "tom cruise" hair on top of his old well worn face looks odd too me

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 9:36:21 PM CST

    TheDark0Knight

    by jimmyjoe redsky

    not having seen this yet but based on the trailer im tempted to agree with you - my theory is, the reason people are into it is neeson - seeing him as an unstoppable tough guy - not expected but very inspired casting - its the exact reason i want to see it

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 9:45:02 PM CST

    Taken is The Best Movie Charles Bronson Never Made

    by tylerdurden3395

    The scene where Neeson shoots his buddy's WIFE when he doesn't help him out had the packed audience STUNNED! Great popcorn flick. (Though the first 20 minutes kinda overdid it when they tried to set him up as "The Father Who Was Never There For His Daughter".)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 9:49:24 PM CST

    PG13?

    by jimmyjoe redsky

    another example of how a movie for grown ups is watered down so kids can see it (lakeview terrace, die hard 4) - why would a 13 year old want to see this? - why should a 13 year old see this? - are there a lot of grade schooler neeson fans? - this is another in a long line of recent movies that suffers from being cut to fit a pg13 rating - its about a guy brutally killing people in an effort to save his daughter - what in that description says pg13? - this has got to stop - i miss the 70s and 80s when there was no shortage of r-rated movies for adults - i was going to see this, but im tempted to wait for the unrated dvd

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 9:51:29 PM CST

    In fact, slap a moustache on Neeson...

    by tylerdurden3395

    and he kinda looks like Chuck Bronson, what with those squinty eyes of his and all...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 11:27:43 PM CST

    Surprisingly solid film.

    by zandunga

    Fast paced, energetic, and highly entertaining - the best action film to be released since Bourne 3, hands down. Liam Neeson makes it all work; he's brutal and magnificent.

    And Capone? If I hadn't already seen it, I'd be really pissed off. Nice job on the major SPOILERS, ásshole.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 11:41:29 PM CST

    I'm gonna check this out..

    by polyh3dron

    Finally.. there's been a real drought lately.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 11:53:53 PM CST

    Great Great Great Great MOVIE!!! a must see

    by eh-nam

    Watched this Overseas and will see it again her in the states....
    this movie gave me shivers i n a few scenes a MUST SEE!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 30, 2009 11:57:57 PM CST

    They didn't really cut much

    by themcflyfarm

    SPOILERS

    all I noticed was that they cut one of the prostitutes getting shot at the construction site, a few barely noticeable gunshot wounds, and primarily the part where he tortures the guy was cut so that he doesn't jam the metal rods into his legs and we don't see his face as much when he's electricuted.

    All in all it wasn't much different than the uncut version.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 1:09:00 AM CST

    i thought it was R when i saw it

    by captaincapslock

    this movie was crazy violent! did they squeak by with the lack of swearing? that's amazing to me, because did i mention how VIOLENT this movie is? glad i saw it before reading this because hey INNOCENT WIFE SPOILER

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 1:28:08 AM CST

    Fun little movie

    by charlie_allnut

    Not trying to be a huge blockbuster w/ lots of effects and stunts. Just a tight, tense plot, just enough character work and to make it work...great action. Great movie. We need more like this. Bravo!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 2:57:22 AM CST

    Now when I see this

    by ledbetter51

    I'll be able to think to myself, "wow, what a totally unexpected moment that would have been if only Capone had used a SPOILER box!" Seriously, guys, do you get charged extra for those or something? Jeebus.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 3:02:32 AM CST

    its PG-13 because

    by geek molester

    they reaaaally want the kiddies to see their masterful pro-torture propaganda.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 5:23:48 AM CST

    Saw this..

    by starskyandhushky

    ..it's 'Commando' in Paris, without the chainmail wearing baddy. And as such, can be appreciated as is. An eighties actioneer, hiding behind todays polish. If you expect any more, you'll be dissapointed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 6:38:58 AM CST

    What on earth ..

    by kadayi

    would inspire you to tell the whole plot as well as the 'expected' twists? What a fucking douche.....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 6:55:56 AM CST

    Tut-fucking-tut Capone

    by iammrmonkey!

    If I hadn't seen this awesome litlle action movie already, I'd be getting tickets to BNAT next year just to whoop your spoilerific little ass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 8:53:30 AM CST

    paul blart2! http://tinyurl.com/dl2uw2

    by ironic_name

    http://tinyurl.com/dl2uw2

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 9:33:09 AM CST

    Taken was great

    by spiritualgorila

    on the cut you were supposed to see that came out a year ago. I sure hate companies making pg-13 cuts just so they can do a publicity stunt with an "unrated" edition. It was rated. in many countries. unrated eidtions period are shit. if it mattered it'd be called a directors cut. and actually add more than a minute.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 11:25:43 AM CST

    Josh Harnett = Charles Bronson

    by darthbakpao

    Squinty eyes... just add moustache, gain some weight, he'll look like Bronson in a few years. By the way, TAKEN rocks! I had so much fun watching it on the theater

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 11:51:02 AM CST

    Not a bad film SPOILER WARNING ON ENDING

    by haywood

    SPOILER! SPOILER::
    Not a bad film, but I lost it when the girl is reunited with her family at the airport and she jumps up and down, happy, and smiling.. What?
    The girl was drugged to the gills, and tortured at some point.. She snaps back quick. Other than that, I love the fight scenes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 12:07:17 PM CST

    bioforge: Take the Fuzzy Elephant!

    by necgray

    Dude, in the TV-safe version of Darkman, they dub over "take the fucking elephant" with "take the fuzzy elephant". It is absolutely HILARIOUS! It actually makes the line better...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 12:09:59 PM CST

    Spoiler Warning

    by pk money

    I agree with all the people calling for a spoiler warning. But even with one I wonder what possesses a seasoned reviewer like Capone to go ahead a give a lame beat by beat synopsis of the film in the first place?! That's not a way to review a film and never has been! And then to give away a key moment for no good reason. Ridiculous! Check out Massawyrms review, he talks about the scene in question and what it meant to him without giving it away. I don't know, I'm going to think twice about reading Capone's reviews from now on.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 3:16:08 PM CST

    Darkman finally got his revenge

    by theplant

    Damn you Sam Raimi

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 31, 2009 9:20:11 PM CST

    Thanks for the spoilers.

    by dingbatty

  • Feb 01, 2009 8:02:31 AM CST

    Lame ass reviwer - you idiot

    by m_prevette

    Well the wife and I planned to see the tonight, now a key scene has been ruined, thanks you fucking idiot. Really, the quality of writing here was never that great, but now with Beaks kissing some rap idiot's ass, and with reviews like this - and there have been others - that gleefully discuss plot details that should not be discussed WITHOUT A FUCKING SPOILER BOX - geez...does anyone edit these reviews at all?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 01, 2009 12:48:12 PM CST

    Thank god I saw it first

    by adelai niska

    and read this review second. You definately spoiled hte biggest shock of the whole movie. But for people who haven't seen it yet- there are at least 4 more absolutely awesome/shocking moments that have not been spoiled.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 02, 2009 7:34:11 AM CST

    Saw this like 8 months ago

    by kalel6000

    A very decent movie, neeson is great in it even though the film is far from perfect.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback